DX Competitive Comparison - 070300
Short Description
Download DX Competitive Comparison - 070300...
Description
DX Competitive Comparisons
March 2007 Sales Training
Cat • Co Cove vera rage ge fro from m DX18 DX180-D 0-DX48 X480 0 – 315CL, 318CL, 320DL, 324DL – 325DL, 330DL, 345DL – Optional counterweight for all models
1
Cat
• All the the D series series Cat machin machines es boasts boasts at at least 9% better better then then C series series • Pre start start flui fluid d level level checks checks – engi engine ne oil, oil, hydrau hydraulic lic oil, oil, and and coola coolant nt • Au Auxi xili liar ary y val valve ve is is stan standa dard rd • Oil sampli sampling ng ports ports for hydrau hydraulic lic oil, oil, engine engine oil, and and coolant coolant • Ful Fully ly automa automatic tic air condi condition tioner er and and heater heater • Swi Swing ng out out cond condense enserr in cool cooler er grou group p • Too Tooll control control sys system tem – cont control rol auxi auxilia liary ry from the moni monitor tor (opti (optional onal)) – One way, two way, one pump, two pump, third pump
2
Cat Options • Pa Patt tter ern n cha chang nge e val valve ve • Si Side de ru rubb bber er bu bump mper ers s • Su Sun n scr scree een n – ro rollle lerr ty type • Th Thir ird d ped pedal al – st stra raig ight ht tr trav avel el
3
Cat Talking Points • Machine computer fails - machine is down • From model to model – Doosan has better forces and lifting capacities • Pattern change valve standard on Doosan DX excavators • All metal doors and engine covers on Doosan DX excavators – Some of the panels on Cat excavators are fiberglass • Doosan’s DX excavators have D-type frame tubes which adds strength and no rubber pads needed • Height of upper rollers is minimal – Material tends to build up and makes it hard to clean • Track adjuster is hard to get to – You have to have special adapter to properly adjust track tension • Cat’s cab is considerably smaller than the Doosan DX excavator • Cat also uses the HEUI (Hydraulically Actuated Electronically Controlled Unit Injector) fuel system that is difficult to diagnose and expensive to repair…….AND THEY DO FAIL! 4
John Deere
• Coverage from DX180-DX480 – 160LC, 200C LC – 240D, 270D, 350D, 450D • Optional counterweights
5
John Deere
• John Deere offers 47% more glass • Fully automatic air conditioner and heater • Greasing interval on arm and boom - 500 hours and 100 on bucket • Hydraulic fan on 350D and up – variable speed • Oil sample valve for hydraulic and engine oil • Swing out condenser and after cooler (350 and up)
6
John Deere Options • Reversible fan on 350 and up • Hydraulic oil filter restriction indicator • Pattern change valve • Third pedal straight travel
7
John Deere Talking Points
• Machine computer fails - machine is down • From model to model – Doosan has better swing torque and lifting capacity – Pattern change valve standard on all Doosan DX models • 47% more glass means more heat in cab – Glass placed in areas that you can’t see through • No central grease point for arm • All pin bosses machined with the exception of the foot – Pin and bushing failure at bucket is not uncommon within 250 hours (machined to loose) • Vents were added at cooler location to dissipate excessive heat build up (NOT FOR LOOKS) • Overall upper structure weaker than Doosan • Machine computer that’s mounted in pilot compartment not tightly sealed – Water damage to computer is not uncommon • ECU is not fuel cooled and mounted below fuel filter – Due to excessive heat build up at ECU it’s not uncommon to replace ECU and high pressure fuel pump at 2000 hour – Fuel filter change interval is 100 hour ( not published) Height of upper roller is minimal and is hard to remove debris
8
Komatsu
• Coverage from DX180-DX480 – PC160, PC200, PC220 – PC270, PC300, PC400 – Optional counterweight for all models
9
Komatsu
• Komatsu boasts at least 10% reduction of fuel consumption over Tier 2 • Fully automatic air conditioner and heater • Five work modes – power, economy, lifting, breaker, and attachment (attachment optional) • Equipment Management Monitoring System • Pipe structured cab framework • Dual air conditioner filter system • High pressure in-line hydraulic filter • Komtrax GPS standard • 3 speed travel (low, mid, high)
10
Komatsu Options • Pattern change valve • Track frame undercover • Third straight travel pedal
11
Komatsu Talking Points • Machine computer fails - machine is down • Doosan has greater arm and bucket breakout forces • Pattern change valve standard on all Doosan DX models • H-Link built lighter than the Doosan DX model excavators • When quick coupler installed all the other attaching parts have to be changed • No central grease point for arm • Komatsu is having pre-mature idler failure – This is causing pre-mature chain failure as a result – Komatsu does not re-enforce their idlers • Komatsu use a plastic cap on top of cab – This cap comes loose and blows off when being transported • Komatsu is experiencing constant parts issues • Komatsu runs a small lower roller – By roller being small, it has been reported that seals don’t hold up well • Upper rollers are mounted low – With rollers being mounted low, it makes it hard to clean between chain and roller frame, and for debris to escape • ECU is block mounted and is not fuel cooled
12
Link-belt
• Coverage from DX180-DX480 – 160LX, 210LX, 240LX – 290LX, 330LX, 460LX
13
Link-belt
• Auto power up – 9% increase in pressure for 8 seconds • Password protected ignition • Pattern change valve standard • Operating modes – auto, heavy, standard, lift, and (attachment optional) • Delay time for auto idle is adjustable • Free swing control • Grease interval for boom and arm - 6 months or 1,000 hours (except bucket) • Single straight travel pedal standard
14
Link-belt Options • Auxiliary hydraulics
15
Link-belt Talking Points • Parts Supply ???? – No internal parts available for travel device and, parts fill rate very slow – Technical support is very bad – No re-man program • Doosan has better specs overall • Machine computer fails machine is down • – All wiring is white and marked poorly • Cab air conditioner has only one filter • High pressure pump relay mounted low on the front of engine – Relay is mounted in a place that holds water • ECU is block mounted and is not fuel cooled
16
Volvo
• Coverage from DX180-DX480 – EC160C, EC210C, EC240B – EC290B, EC330B, EC360B, EC460B
17
Volvo
• Fully automatic air conditioner and heat er • Single straight travel pedal • Tinted glass • Auxiliary valve • Adjustable auxiliary from the cab (pressure and flow)
18
Volvo Options • Opening top hatch • Cloth seats
19
Volvo Talking Points • Machine computer fails - machine is down • Tier 3 engine IEGR system (electrical) • Dealers have problems downloading V-CAD programs • Having a lot of problems with the a/c controller – Controller is very expensive when it fails • Boom has no inner support • All pin bosses are machined (except at foot) • • ECU block mounted and not fuel cooled – Poor harness protection at ECU causing a lot of problems
20
Kobelco
• Coverage from DX180-DX480 – SK160, SK200, SK210, SK250 – SK290, SK330, SK480
21
Kobelco
• Fully automatic air conditioner and heater • Straight travel system • Independent travel circuit, dedicated flow for travel • Warm-up function of engine and hydraulic system, functions automatically
22
Kobelco Options • Belly pan guard • Control pattern changer • Boom/arm load lock valves
23
Kobelco Talking Points • When machine is in independent travel mode all other hydraulic functions are greatly reduced. • Kobelco boasts of auto engine and hydraulic warm up. Doosan’s warm-up procedure requires no additional equipment and takes less time. • Belly pans are standard equipment on Doosan DX excavators. They are optional on all Kobelco machines. • Pattern change valve is standard on DX excavators. • – A lot of the wiring harnesses are not available for purchase (technicians have to build them) • The upper structure has a c-frame type channel and is very weak and does not protect major components • One cab air filter and is not sealed tightly • Solid state relays in poor location and not sealed • Auxiliary valve is not part of the main control valve
24
PC290LC-8
EC290CL
Bonnet 전체 횡방향으로 여는 구조
3분할 구조
별도의 스테이 없이 2개의 Gas spring으로 지지
Radiator, Muffler 상부 Cover 는 Bolt 고정 스테이 해제 레버 추가
25
- Cooling System (30ton) PC290LC-8
EC290CL
병렬배치
오일쿨러 직렬배치 O/C
CAC
O/C
RAD
RAD
CAC
Fan
Fan
T-RAD
Spain 업체
(H)970x(W)1730
(H)910x(W)850 오일쿨러 Swing out 가능
엔진 직결 Fan
유압구동식 별치 Fan
(중앙 콘타입 허브형상 Fan) 엔진PTO 에 펌프직결->릴리프V/V
->Fan구동모터->리턴라인 26
Questions
27
DX180 vs. S175 SPEC
DX180LC (T3)
S175 (T2)
Net Hp
118 @ 1,950
118 @1,950
Net Torque (ft.lb)
333 @ 1,450
333 @ 1,450
Displacement (cu.in)
359
353
Operating Weight (lbs)
39,683
38,800
Boom
17’1”
16’11”
Arm
8’6”
8’6”
Max. Digging Depth
20’1”
20’5”
Swing Torque (lbf)
33,988
30,720
Drawbar Pull (lbf)
33,730
31,085
Arm Force (lbf)
19,626
20,300
Bucket Force (lbf)
24,909
28,900
10’ above ground (lbs)
10,110
10,510
Ground level (lbs)
9,570
9,880
10’ below ground (lbs)
9,560
9,830
Pump output (gpm)
40.2
40.2
System pressure (psi)
4,699 / 4,975
4,690 / 4,980
28
DX225 vs. S225 SPEC
DX225LC (T3)
S225 (T2)
Net Hp
148 @ 1,900
148 @ 1,950
Net Torque (ft.lb)
491 @ 1,400
445 @ 1,400
Displacement (cu.in)
359
353
Operating Weight (lbs)
48,721
48,800
Boom
18’8”
18’8”
Arm
9’6”
9’6”
Max. Digging Depth
21’9”
21’9”
Swing Torque (lbf)
46,848
44,143
Drawbar Pull (lbf)
48,943
45,860
Arm Force (lbf)
27,778
22,500
Bucket Force (lbf)
33,510
28,900
10’ above ground (lbs)
12,940
11,840
Ground level (lbs)
15,610
14,880
10’ below ground (lbs)
15,460
14,190
Pump output (gpm)
55
56.8
System pressure (psi)
4,699 / 4,975
4,690 / 4,980
29
DX255 vs. S255 SPEC
DX255LC (T3)
S255 (T2)
Net Hp
166 @ 1,900
162 @ 2,000
Net Torque (ft.lb)
564 @ 1,400
492 @ 1,400
Displacement (cu.in)
359
353
Operating Weight (lbs)
55,556
55,600
Boom
19’4”
19’4”
Arm
9’10”
9’10”
Max. Digging Depth
22’4”
22’3”
Swing Torque (lbf)
56,318
54,248
Drawbar Pull (lbf)
47,619
46,520
Arm Force (lbf)
26,676
26,000
Bucket Force (lbf)
35,494
33,500
10’ above ground (lbs)
15,120 (2’ shoe)
15,010
Ground level (lbs)
18,780 (2’ shoe)
19,310
10’ below ground (lbs)
18,590 (2’ shoe)
19,300
Pump output (gpm)
58
59.2
System pressure (psi)
4,699 / 4,975
4,690 / 4,980
30
DX300 vs. S300 SPEC
DX300LC (T3)
S300 (T2)
Net Hp
197 @ 1,900
197 @ 1,900
Net Torque (ft.lb)
673 @ 1,300
622 @ 1,300
Displacement (cu.in)
466
493
Operating Weight (lbs)
66,580
67,500
Boom
20’6”
20’6”
Arm
10’2”
10’2”
Max. Digging Depth
24’1”
24’1”
Swing Torque (lbf)
72,836
74,556
Drawbar Pull (lbf)
55,556
51,587
Arm Force (lbf)
30,423
29,500
Bucket Force (lbf)
44,974
39,900
10’ above ground (lbs)
17,309
16,850
Ground level (lbs)
22,756
22,200
10’ below ground (lbs)
23,483
22,870
Pump output (gpm)
66
65.2
System pressure (psi)
4,786 / 5,076
4,690 / 4,970
31
DX340 vs. S340 SPEC
DX340LC (T3)
S340 (T2)
Net Hp
247 @ 1,750
247 @ 1,900
Net Torque (ft.lb)
846 @ 1,300
781 @ 1,400
Displacement (cu.in)
466
674
Operating Weight (lbs)
76,721
76,500
Boom
21’4”
21’4”
Arm
10’6”
10’6”
Max. Digging Depth
24’7”
25’2”
Swing Torque (lbf)
84,337
84,967
Drawbar Pull (lbf)
59,525
61,300
Arm Force (lbf)
38,140
38,400
Bucket Force (lbf)
47,840
48,000
10’ above ground (lbs)
21,653
20,570
Ground level (lbs)
27,033
26,310
10’ below ground (lbs)
26,438
26,410
Pump output (gpm)
70
70.3
System pressure (psi)
4,786 / 5,076
4,690 / 4,970
32
DX420 vs. S420 SPEC
DX420LC (T3)
S420 (T2)
Net Hp
293 @ 1,800
281 @ 2,000
Net Torque (ft.lb)
1013 @ 1,300
853 @ 1,400
Displacement (cu.in)
669
675
Operating Weight (lbs)
92,370
92,815
Boom
22’
22’
Arm
10’8”
10’8”
Max. Digging Depth
25’4”
25’4”
Swing Torque (lbf)
94,752
97,645
Drawbar Pull (lbf)
71,650
73,634
Arm Force (lbf)
43,430
42,500
Bucket Force (lbf)
59,524
53,100
10’ above ground (lbs)
27,033
26,420
Ground level (lbs)
33,031
32,580
10’ below ground (lbs)
31,664
31,580
Pump output (gpm)
83.2
83.2
System pressure (psi)
4,550 / 4,970
4,550 / 4,970
33
DX480 vs. S480 SPEC
DX480LC (T3)
S470 (T2)
Net Hp
328 @ 1,800
312 @ 2,000
Net Torque (ft.lb)
1137 @ 1,300
962 @ 1,400
Displacement (cu.in)
669
675
Operating Weight (lbs)
106,900
105,600
Boom
23’4”
23’4”
Arm
11’
11’
Max. Digging Depth
25’7”
25’6”
Swing Torque (lbf)
94,050
93,484
Drawbar Pull (lbf)
74,080
74,080
Arm Force (lbf)
49,800
48,600
Bucket Force (lbf)
67,900
59,900
10’ above ground (lbs)
36,868
33,570
Ground level (lbs)
41,741
39,640
10’ below ground (lbs)
37,728
37,220
Pump output (gpm)
93
94.8
System pressure (psi)
4,550 / 4,970
4,550 / 4,970
34
DX180LC vs. Competition
SPEC
DX180LC (T3)
Cat 315C L (T2)
JD 160LC (T2)
Komatsu PC160LC (T2)
Net Hp
118 @ 1,950
110
105 @ 2,300
115 @ 2,200
Net Torque (ft.lb)
333 @ 1,450
NA
296 @ 1,500
NA
Displacement (cu.in)
359
305
276
272
Operating Weight (lbs)
39,683
36,930
35,444
37,130
Boom
17’1”
16’9”
16’9”
16’11”
Arm
8’6”
8’6”
8’6”
8’7”
Max. Digging Depth
20’1”
19’10”
19’5”
19’7”
Swing Torque (lbf)
33,988
31,700
27,590
31,314
Drawbar Pull (lbf)
33,730
33,710
30,160
35,160
Arm Force (lbf)
19,626
17,080
16,830
18,740
Bucket Force (lbf)
24,909
22,250
22,370
24,470
10’ above ground (lbs)
10,110
9,050
7,767
9,900
Ground level (lbs)
9,570
9,050
8,382
9,200
10’ below ground (lbs)
9,560
9,000
8,280
9,100
Pump output (gpm)
40.2
39.6
32.5
41.2
System pressure (psi)
4,699 / 4,975
4,980 / NA
4,980 / NA
NA / 5,400
35
DX180LC vs. Competition
SPEC
DX180LC (T3)
Case CX160B (T3)
Link-belt 160LX (T2)
Volvo EC160C (T3)
Net Hp
118 @ 1,950
120 @ 2,200
101 @ 2,200
116 @ 1,500
Net Torque (ft.lb)
333 @ 1,450
288 @ 1,450
311 @ 1,600
461 @ 1,350
Displacement (cu.in)
359
183
264
348
Operating Weight (lbs)
39,683
37,700
36,200
38,860
Boom
17’1”
16’11”
16’11”
17’1”
Arm
8’6”
8’6”
8’10”
8’6”
Max. Digging Depth
20’1”
19’11”
20’1”
19’10”
Swing Torque (lbf)
33,988
NA
33,260
?
Drawbar Pull (lbf)
33,730
36,194
28,840
32,520
Arm Force (lbf)
19,626
18,884
17,090
17,990
Bucket Force (lbf)
24,909
26,527
26,530
23,660
10’ above ground (lbs)
10,110
10,300
9,160
10,560
Ground level (lbs)
9,570
9,550
8,380
?
10’ below ground (lbs)
9,560
9,350
8,310
X
Pump output (gpm)
40.2
37.5
36.2
38
System pressure (psi)
4,699 / 4,975
4,975 / 5,265
4,970 / 5,260
4,690 / 4,980
36
DX225LC vs. Competition
SPEC
DX225LC (T3)
Cat 320D L (T3)
JD 200C LC (T2)
Komatsu PC200LC-8 (T3)
Net Hp
148 @ 1,900
148
141 @ 2,150
148 @ 2,000
Net Torque (ft.lb)
445 @ 1,400
NA
427 @ 1,300
NA
Displacement (cu.in)
353
389
414
408
Operating Weight (lbs)
47,399
44,820
46,130
47,260
Boom
18’8”
18’7”
NA
18’8”
Arm
9’6”
9’7”
9’7”
9’7”
Max. Digging Depth
21’9”
22’1”
21’11”
21’9”
Swing Torque (lbf)
46,848
46,612
43,218
49,907
Drawbar Pull (lbf)
48,942
46,311
42,420
40,120
Arm Force (lbf)
23,810
23,223
23,250
22,710
Bucket Force (lbf)
33,510
28,079
30,410
31,080
10’ above ground (lbs)
12,940
12,050
10,818
12,450
Ground level (lbs)
15,610
14,700
14,764
11,400
10’ below ground (lbs)
15,460
14,500
14,495
11,200
Pump output (gpm)
55
54
57.9
58
System pressure (psi)
4,693 / 4,978
NA / 5,076
4,980 / 5,270
NA / 5,400
37
DX225LC vs. Competition
SPEC
DX225LC (T3)
Case CX210 (T2)
Link-belt 210LX (T2)
Volvo EC210B LC (T3)
Net Hp
148 @ 1,900
147 @ 1,950
138 @ 1,950
147 @ 1,800
Net Torque (ft.lb)
445 @ 1,400
450 @ 1,400
392 @ 1,600
553 @ 1,350
Displacement (cu.in)
353
359
396
348
Operating Weight (lbs)
47,399
44,002
44,800
48,520
Boom
18’8”
18’8”
18’8”
18’8”
Arm
9’6”
9’10”
9’10”
9’6”
Max. Digging Depth
21’9”
22’
22’
22’1”
Swing Torque (lbf)
46,848
NA
44,840
?
Drawbar Pull (lbf)
48,942
41,140
41,230
41,230
Arm Force (lbf)
23,810
23,380
23,380
23,150
Bucket Force (lbf)
33,510
30,994
31,720
29,310
10’ above ground (lbs)
12,940
12,335
12,330
13,360
Ground level (lbs)
15,610
13,333
13,330
16,090
10’ below ground (lbs)
15,460
13,077
13,070
15,980
Pump output (gpm)
55
53.1
53.1
53
System pressure (psi)
4,693 / 4,978
4,975 / 5,410
4,970 / 5,410
4,690 / 4,980
38
DX255LC vs. Competition
SPEC
DX255LC (T3)
Cat 324D L (T3)
JD 240D LC (T3)
Komatsu PC220LC-8 (T3)
Net Hp
166 @ 1,900
186
177 @ 2,000
168 @ 2,000
Net Torque (ft.lb)
564 @ 1,400
NA
576 @ 1,400
NA
Displacement (cu.in)
359
439
414
408
Operating Weight (lbs)
55,556
54,660
54,434
54,926
Boom
19’4”
19’4”
NA
19’2”
Arm
9’10”
9’8”
9’9”
10’
22’4”
22’6”
22’5”
22’8”
Swing Torque (lbf)
56,318
54,137
54,857
58,334
Drawbar Pull (lbf)
47,619
51,032
49,920
45,350
Arm Force (lbf)
26,676
27,651
27,640
26,680
Bucket Force (lbf)
35,494
36,644
37,670
34,170
10’ above ground (lbs)
?
17,300
13,047
15,800
Ground level (lbs)
?
19,200
17,721
18,050
10’ below ground (lbs)
?
18,900
17,921
17,750
Pump output (gpm)
58
58
59.2
58
System pressure (psi)
4,699 / 4,975
5,076 / 5,221
4,980 / 5,260
NA / 5400
Max. Di
in De th
39
DX255LC vs. Competition
SPEC
DX255LC (T3)
Case CX240B (T3)
Link-belt 240LX (T2)
Volvo EC240B LC (T3)
Net Hp
166 @ 1,900
177 @ 2,000
162 @ 2,150
168 @ 1,800
Net Torque (ft.lb)
564 @ 1,400
469 @ 1,500
415 @ 1,800
642 @ 1,350
Displacement (cu.in)
359
317
396
436
Operating Weight (lbs)
55,556
55,120
52,700
55,280
Boom
19’4”
19’2”
19’2”
19’8”
Arm
9’10”
9’10”
10’2”
9’9”
22’4”
22’7”
22’10”
22’11”
Swing Torque (lbf)
56,318
NA
55,130
NA
Drawbar Pull (lbf)
47,619
45,254
43,010
46,960
Arm Force (lbf)
26,676
29,000
28,100
26,680
Bucket Force (lbf)
35,494
39,117
38,890
35,280
10’ above ground (lbs)
?
15,350
13,770
17,150
Ground level (lbs)
?
18,350
15,710
19,310
10’ below ground (lbs)
?
17,900
15,340
19,160
Pump output (gpm)
58
61.8
56
61
System pressure (psi)
4,699 / 4,975
4,975 / 5,337
4,970 / 5,410
4,550 / 4,980
Max. Di
in De th
40
DX300LC vs. Competition
SPEC
DX300LC (T3)
Cat 325DL (T3)
Deere 270DLC (T3)
Komatsu PC270LC-8 (T3)
Net Hp
197 @ 1,900
202 @ 2000
188 @ 2,100
187 @2,050
Net Torque (ft.lb)
673 @ 1,300
NA
599 @ 1,400
NA
Displacement (cu.in)
466
440
414
408
Operating Weight (lbs)
66,580
64,460
63,425
65,036
Boom
20’6”
20’2”
NA
19’2”
Arm
10’2”
10’6”
10’2”
10’
Max. Digging Depth
24’1”
25’1”
23’10”
21’2”
Swing Torque (lbf)
72,836
60,628
56,852
64,292
Drawbar Pull (lbf)
55,556
55,977
56,074
56,000
Arm Force (lbf)
30,423
34,171
29,518
30,640
Bucket Force (lbf)
44,974
42,489
37,480
39,460
10’ above ground (lbs)
17,309
17,700*
14,959
18,700
Ground level (lbs)
22,756
22,750*
20,773
22,300
10’ below ground (lbs)
23,483
22,050*
21,566
21,950
Pump output (gpm)
2 x 66
2 x 62
62.3
59.5
System pressure (psi)
4,786 / 5,076
5,076 / 5,221
4,980 / 5,260
NA / 5,400
41
DX300LC vs. Competition
SPEC
DX300LC (T3)
Case CX290B (T3)
Link-belt 290LX (T3)
Volvo EC290B LC (T3)
Net Hp
197 @ 1,900
207 @ 1,800
177 @ 2,200
192 @ 1,800
Net Torque (ft.lb)
673 @ 1,300
627 @ 1,500
443 @ 1,800
712 @ 1,350
Displacement (cu.in)
466
475
396
436
Operating Weight (lbs)
66,580
65,697
64,400
64,390
Boom
20’6”
20’2”
20’2”
20’4”
Arm
10’2”
10’6”
10’6”
10’
Max. Digging Depth
24’1”
23’4”
23’5”
24’
Swing Torque (lbf)
72,836
NA
55,130
NA
Drawbar Pull (lbf)
55,556
52,425
50,220
51,810
Arm Force (lbf)
30,423
29,765
28,100
30,340
Bucket Force (lbf)
44,974
42,754
38,890
38,810
10’ above ground (lbs)
17,309
20,300
18,870
20,490
Ground level (lbs)
22,756
23,600
21,910
23,580
10’ below ground (lbs)
23,483
23,050
21,490
23,430
Pump output (gpm)
2 x 66
64.2
58.4
66
System pressure (psi)
4,786 / 5,076
4,975 / 5410
4,970 / 5,410
4,550 / 4,980
42
DX340LC vs. Competition
SPEC
DX340LC (T3)
Cat 330DL (T3)
JD 350DLC (T3)
Komatsu PC300LC-7 (T3)
Net Hp
247 @ 1,750
252
271 @ 1,900
246 @ 1,950
Net Torque (ft.lb)
846 @ 1,300
NA
1098 @ 1,300
NA
Displacement (cu.in)
466
537
542
505
Operating Weight (lbs)
76,721
79,700
77,269
75,376
Boom
21’4”
21’4”
NA
21’3”
Arm
10’6”
10’6”
10’6”
10’5”
24’7”
24’7”
24’3”
24’3”
Swing Torque (lbf)
84,337
80,142
81,950
82,313
Drawbar Pull (lbf)
59,525
67,443
67,928
59,300
Arm Force (lbf)
38,140
36,486
38,030
37,040
Bucket Force (lbf)
47,840
42,849
48,220
44,970
10’ above ground (lbs)
21,653
22,750
22,600
22,950
Ground level (lbs)
27,033
28,150
27,598
26,750
10’ below ground (lbs)
26,438
27,700
27,279
24,600
Pump output (gpm)
70
74
76.1
70.5
System pressure (psi)
4,786 / 5,076
5,076 / 5,221
4,980 / 5,260
NA / 5,400
Max. Di
in De th
43
DX340LC vs. Competition
SPEC
DX340LC (T3)
Case CX330 (T3)
Link-belt 330LX (T3)
Volvo EC330LC (T3)
Net Hp
247 @ 1,750
271 @ 2,000
271 @ 2,000
247 @ 1,700
Net Torque (ft.lb)
846 @ 1,300
796 @ 1,500
797 @ 1,500
1088 @ 1,475
Displacement (cu.in)
466
475
475
738
Operating Weight (lbs)
76,721
78,043
78,500
76,600
Boom
21’4”
21’2”
21’2”
21’2”
Arm
10’6”
10’8”
10’8”
10’6”
Max. Digging Depth
24’7”
24’1”
24’1”
24’2”
Swing Torque (lbf)
84,337
NA
82,680
NA
Drawbar Pull (lbf)
59,525
60,923
55,840
57,770
Arm Force (lbf)
38,140
40,016
40,020
38,810
Bucket Force (lbf)
47,840
55,843
55,840
47,190
10’ above ground (lbs)
21,653
23,489
23,460
24,850
Ground level (lbs)
27,033
28,925
28,890
28,540
10’ below ground (lbs)
26,438
28,205
28,170
28,360
Pump output (gpm)
70
75
75
74
System pressure (psi)
4,786 / 5,076
4,975 / 5,410
4,975 / 5,410
4,550 / 4,980
44
DX420LC vs. Competition
SPEC
DX420LC (T3)
Cat 345CL (T3)
Komatsu PC400LC-7 (T3)
Volvo EC360BLC (T3)
Net Hp
293 @ 1,800
345
345 @ 1,900
247 @ 1,700
Net Torque (ft.lb)
1013 @ 1,300
NA
NA
1088 @ 1,475
Displacement (cu.in)
669
763
674
738
Operating Weight (lbs)
92,370
99,150
99,263
83,040
Boom
22’
22’8”
23’2”
21’2”
Arm
10’8”
11’
25’8”
10’6”
Max. Digging Depth
25’4”
25’1”
25’8”
24’7”
Swing Torque (lbf)
94,752
109,560
111,059
NA
Drawbar Pull (lbf)
71,650
75,920
73,880
57,770
Arm Force (lbf)
43,430
43,900
46,080
38,810
Bucket Force (lbf)
59,524
53,500
53,790
47,190
10’ above ground (lbs)
27,033
33,400
33,300
28,800
Ground level (lbs)
33,031
39,500
38900
33,370
10’ below ground (lbs)
31,664
37,250
36,300
33,180
Pump output (gpm)
83.2
95
91
74
System pressure (psi)
4,550 / 4,970
5,080 / 5,511
NA / 5400
4,550 / 4,980
45
DX480LC vs. Competition
SPEC
DX480LC (T3)
Cat 345CL (T3)
Deere 450DLC (T3)
Komatsu PC400LC-7 (T3)
Net Hp
328 @ 1,800
345 NA
348 @ 1,800
345 @ 1,900
Net Torque (ft.lb)
1,137 @ 1,300
NA
1,164 @ 1,500
NA
Displacement (cu.in)
669
763
957
674
Operating Weight (lbs)
106,900
98,905
106,180
98,271
Boom
23’4”
22’8”
23’
23’ 2”
Arm
11’
11’
11’2”
11’ 1”
Max. Digging Depth
25’7”
25’1”
25’6”
25’ 8”
Swing Torque (lbf)
93,306
109,560
107,004
111.059
Drawbar Pull (lbf)
74,080
75,920
79,590
73,880
Arm Force (lbf)
49,800
43,900
47,321
46,080
Bucket Force (lbf)
67,900
53,500
57,111
53,790
10’ above ground (lbs)
36,868
31,650*
33,400
33,300
Ground level (lbs)
41,741
37,850*
40,200
38,900
10’ below ground (lbs)
37,728
36,050*
37,700
36,300
Pump output (gpm)
2 x 93.0
2 x 95.0
2 x 100
2 x 91.0
System pressure (psi)
4,550 / 4,970
5,080 / 5,511
4625 / NA
5,400 / NA
46
View more...
Comments