dp15e

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES EXXON ENGINEERING

DESIGN PRACTICES Section

Page

XV-E PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

1 of 60

Date December, 1999 Changes shown by ➧

CONTENTS Section

Page

SCOPE ................................................................................................................................................................4 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................................................4 DESIGN PRACTICES.................................................................................................................................4 INTERNATIONAL PRACTICES ..................................................................................................................4 OTHER LITERATURE ................................................................................................................................4 BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................................................................4 FLARE TYPES AND APPLICATION ..................................................................................................................4 ELEVATED FLARES ..................................................................................................................................4 GROUND FLARES .....................................................................................................................................5 BURNING-PIT FLARES..............................................................................................................................5 BASIC DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS .................................................................................................................5 FLARE SPACING, LOCATION AND HEIGHT ............................................................................................5 FLARE CAPACITY AND SIZING ................................................................................................................5 FLASHBACK SEALS ..................................................................................................................................6 DESIGN PROCEDURE .......................................................................................................................................6 ELEVATED FLARES ..................................................................................................................................6 MULTIJET FLARES ....................................................................................................................................7 STACK DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS FOR MULTIJET FLARES (SEE FIGURE 6)....................................8 BURNING-PIT FLARES............................................................................................................................11 FLARE PILOTS AND IGNITERS - ALL FLARES ......................................................................................13 FLASHBACK PROTECTION FOR FLARE SYSTEMS .............................................................................14 REDUCING FLARE PULSING AND NOISE .............................................................................................16 FLARING OF H2S STREAMS...................................................................................................................17 SPARE FLARE CAPACITY CONSIDERATIONS .....................................................................................18 FLARE GAS METERING ..........................................................................................................................18 PROTECTION AGAINST LOW AMBIENT OR FLARE GAS TEMPERATURES ......................................18 APPENDIX A - RADIATION AND SPACING FROM FLARES AND IGNITED VENTS....................................42 COMPUTER CALCULATIONS .................................................................................................................42 SIMPLIFIED CALCULATION OF FLAME SHAPE AND LENGTH ............................................................42 Calculation Procedure ............................................................................................................................42 DETAILED CALCULATION OF FLAME SHAPE AND LENGTH...............................................................43 CALCULATION OF LOWER FLAMMABLE LIMIT CL ...............................................................................44

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

DESIGN PRACTICES Section

Page

XV-E 2 of 60 Date December, 1999

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

EXXON ENGINEERING

CONTENTS (Cont) Section

Page

IGNITED PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE RELEASES.................................................................................45 Equal Diameter Vents ............................................................................................................................45 Unequal Diameter Vents ........................................................................................................................45 Definition of Terms.................................................................................................................................45 CALCULATION OF RADIANT HEAT FLUX K ..........................................................................................45 Information Required .............................................................................................................................45 Calculation Procedure............................................................................................................................46 PERSONNEL EXPOSURE LIMITS TO HEAT RADIATION .....................................................................47 Heat Radiation From Flares ...................................................................................................................47 Heat Radiation From Ignition of Pressure Relief Valve Releases and Start-up Vents ...........................47 EQUIPMENT EXPOSURE TO HEAT RADIATION...................................................................................48 APPENDIX B - LIMITS OF FLAMMABILITY OF GAS MIXTURES..................................................................54 PRESSURE AND TEMPERATURE EFFECTS ON FLAMMABLE LIMITS...............................................54 Increased Pressure Will Widen Flammability Limits...............................................................................54 Increased Temperature Will Also Widen the Flammability Limits...........................................................54 CALCULATION OF FLAMMABILITY LIMITS ...........................................................................................54 TABLES Table 1 Table 2 Table B-1 Table B-2 FIGURES Figure 1A Figure 1B Figure 1C Figure 1D Figure 2A Figure 2B Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6A Figure 6B Figure 7 Figure 8 Figure 9A Figure 9B Figure 10 Figure 11 Figure 12 Figure 13 Figure 14

Comparison of Flare Types .............................................................................................19 Elevated Flare Tips .........................................................................................................20 Limits of Flammability of Gases and Vapors, Percent in Air............................................56 The Calculation of Flammable Limits ..............................................................................57

Smokeless Elevated Flare Tip (Steam Ring Type)..........................................................22 Smokeless Elevated Flare Tip (Steam Ring and Inspirated Air Type).............................23 Smokeless Elevated Flare Tip (Steam Inspirated Air Type)............................................24 Smokeless Elevated Flare Tip (Steam Inspirated Air Type)............................................25 (Customary Units) Pressure Drop in John Zink Flare Tips ..............................................26 (Metric Units) Pressure Drop in John Zink Flare Tips......................................................27 Nominal Steam Requirement for Typical Proprietary Flare Tips (John Zink Stf-S) .........28 Flare Performance Chart for Propane .............................................................................29 Multijet Flare Seal Drum Arrangement For Use on Multijet, Ground, or Staged Elevated Flare.....................................................................................................30 Details of Typical Multijet Flare .......................................................................................31 Details of Typical Multijet Flare .......................................................................................32 Typical Burning-Pit Flare.................................................................................................33 Typical Elevated Flare Pilot and Igniter...........................................................................34 (Customary Units) Typical Flare Seal Drum....................................................................35 (Metric Units) Typical Flare Seal Drum ...........................................................................36 Molecular Dry Seal (John Zink).......................................................................................37 Fluidic Seal (National Airoil) ............................................................................................38 Typical Non-Pulsing Sparger ..........................................................................................39 NH4HS Deposition Temperatures ...................................................................................40 NH4HCO3 Deposition Temperatures...............................................................................41

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES EXXON ENGINEERING

DESIGN PRACTICES Section

Page

XV-E PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

3 of 60

Date December, 1999

CONTENTS (Cont) Section Figure A-1A Figure A-1B Figure A-2A Figure A-2B Figure A-3 Figure B-1 Figure B-2 Figure B-3

Page (Customary Units) Flame Center for Flares and Ignited Vents Zc- Vertical Distance, ft ..49 (Metric Units) Flame Center for Flares and Ignited Vents Zc- Vertical Distance, m .........50 (Customary Units) Flame Center for Flares and Ignited Vents Xc- Horizontal Distance, ft ......................................................................................................................51 (Metric Units) Flame Center for Flares and Ignited Vents Xc- Horizontal Distance, m.....52 Dimensionless Flame Coordinates..................................................................................53 Flammable Limits for Hydrogen, Carbon Monoxide, Methane, With Nitrogen, Carbon Dioxide and Water Vapor....................................................................................58 Flammable Limits for Paraffin Hydrocarbons With Nitrogen and Carbon Dioxide ...........59 Flammable Limits for Methane, Ethylene, Benzene With Carbon Dioxide, Nitrogen and Water Vapor .............................................................................................................60

Revision Memo 12/99 Page 14 Page 54 Page 57 Page 59

Highlights of this revision are: Eq. (9), corrected formula to include denominator inside the square root sign. Clarified how the flammability limits expand at higher pressures. Also clarified how to apply the multiplier in the table to estimate the UFL. Corrected typographical error of UFL of H2/N2 mixture in Calculation 8 and in Summary. Corrected formula for propane (C2H6) in the propane/CO2 mixture curve.

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

DESIGN PRACTICES Section

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES

Page

XV-E 4 of 60 Date December, 1999

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

EXXON ENGINEERING

SCOPE This section presents the criteria for selecting, designing and spacing elevated, burning-pit and multijet flares. The design of safety valve and flare headers is covered in Section XV-C, and associated blowdown drums, water disengaging drums etc., are covered in Section XV-D.

REFERENCES DESIGN PRACTICES Section VIII Section XIV Section XVI

Fired Heaters Fluid Flow Noise Control

INTERNATIONAL PRACTICES IP 2-1-1, IP 3-2-1, IP 3-9-1, IP 4-2-1,

Plant Noise Design Criteria Sewer Systems Winterizing and Protection Against Ambient Temperatures Auxiliary Structures for Operation and Maintenance

OTHER LITERATURE 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.

API RP 521, Guide for Pressure Relief and Depressuring Systems, (3rd Edition, 1990). Predicting Radiant Heating from Flares, ER&E Report No. EE.15ER.71. New Seal Drum Sparger Can Eliminate Flare Pulsing, ER&E Report No. EE.57E.73. A Survey of Flaring Experience in Exxon Refineries and Chemical Plants, ER&E Report No. EE.45E.77. Safe Flaring of Concentrated Hydrogen Sulphide Streams, ER&E Report No. EE.49E.84. Flare Pilot Ignition and Verification, ER&E Report No. EE.47E.88. Use of Dynamic Simulation for Estimating Flare Loads From Process Equipment, ER&E Report No. EE.71E.97.

BACKGROUND The flare is a key component of the closed emergency release system in a refinery or chemical plant. Emergency releases originating from pressure relief valves, vapor blowdowns, process stream diversion, etc., and equipment drainage, which cannot be discharged directly to the atmosphere for reasons of safety or pollution control, are routed through closed systems to a blowdown drum where liquids and vapors are separated. Other emergency vapor streams are vented from disengaging drums handling contaminated effluent cooling water, process water drawoffs, etc. The flare provides a means of safe disposal of the vapor streams from these facilities, by burning them under controlled conditions such that adjacent equipment or personnel are not exposed to hazard, and at the same time meeting pollution control and public relations requirements.

FLARE TYPES AND APPLICATION Three types of flare are available: the elevated flare, the ground flare, and the burning-pit flare. Although the three basic designs differ considerably in required capital and operating costs, selection is based primarily on pollution/public relations considerations; i.e., smoke, luminosity, air pollution, noise and spacing factors. Table 1 summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of the various types of flare.

ELEVATED FLARES The elevated flare is by far the most commonly used type of flare used in refineries and chemical plants. The elevated flare, by the use of steam injection and effective tip design, can be made smokeless and of reasonably low luminosity up to about 20% of maximum flaring load. Steam injection introduces a source of noise, and a compromise between smoke elimination and noise is usually necessary. If adequately elevated, this type of flare has the best dispersion characteristics for malodorous and toxic combustion products, but visual and noise pollution can present public relations problems. Capital costs are relatively high, and an appreciable plant area may be rendered unavailable for plant equipment, because of radiant heat considerations.

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES EXXON ENGINEERING

DESIGN PRACTICES Section

Page

XV-E PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

5 of 60

Date December, 1999

FLARE TYPES AND APPLICATION (Cont) Despite some of its disadvantages, the elevated flare is the general choice either for total flare loads, or for handling overcapacity releases in conjunction with a multijet ground flare. For most applications, the elevated type is the only acceptable means of flaring "dirty gases," i.e., gases high in unsaturates or hydrogen sulfide, or which have highly toxic combustion products. Three types of stack for elevated flares are used: Guyed Stack - This type is usually the least expensive to build but in some cases the guy wires result in restrictions on the use of adjacent land, in addition to normal spacing restrictions. Derrick Type Stack - This type of unit is well-suited for tall structures subject to strong winds. However, derrick type stacks are the most expensive to erect and maintain. Self-Supporting Stack - This type of unit is designed so that the flare riser pipe has no lateral structural support. For short flares, this type is the least expensive to erect and maintain.

GROUND FLARES Various designs of ground flare are available. The type, which has been used almost exclusively, is the multijet flare. Smokeless operation can generally be achieved, with essentially no noise or luminosity problems, provided that the design gas rate to the flare is not exceeded. However, since the flame is near ground level, dispersion of stack releases is poor and this may result in severe air pollution or hazard if the combustion products are toxic or in the event of flame-out. Capital and operating cost and maintenance requirements are high. The multijet flare is suitable for "clean burning" gases (i.e., where toxic or malodorous concentrations are unlikely to be released through incomplete combustion or as combustion products) when noise and visual pollution factors are critical. It should not be used in locations upwind of adjacent residential areas. Generally, it is not practical to install multijet flares large enough to burn the maximum release load, and the usual arrangement is a combination with an elevated over-capacity flare. Other proprietary designs of ground flare suitable for refinery application are available. In some of these cases, noise is appreciable, in comparison with the multijet type, but their compact size, low space requirement, simplicity, and hence low cost, may give an overall advantage.

BURNING-PIT FLARES The burning pit is of simple construction, with low capital and operating costs, and it can handle liquid as well as vapor hydrocarbons. Its use is usually limited by spacing requirements and smoke formation, and it is applied only in remote locations where there are essentially no pollution restrictions.

BASIC DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS FLARE SPACING, LOCATION AND HEIGHT Spacing, location and height of flares are determined by consideration of the following factors: Radiant Heat - Acceptable levels of radiant heat density for equipment and in areas where personnel may be present. Burning Liquid Fall-out - The possibility of burning liquid fall-out from an elevated flare, if liquid hydrocarbons should be entrained into it. Pollution Limitations (i.e., smoke formation, malodorous or toxic combustion products, noise) - May be based on statutory and/or public relations requirements.

FLARE CAPACITY AND SIZING Flare systems are designed to handle the largest vapor release from pressure relief valves, vapor blowdowns and other emergency systems, which results from the design contingency. Normally the largest single contingency basis is used, as discussed in Sections XV-C and XV-D. Flare sizing is covered in detail under Design Procedure in this section, and sizing of the overall flare system, including pressure relief valve and flare headers, blowdown drums and seal drums, is covered in Section XV-C.

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

DESIGN PRACTICES Section

Page

XV-E 6 of 60 Date December, 1999

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

EXXON ENGINEERING

BASIC DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS (Cont) FLASHBACK SEALS As described in Section XV-B, flare systems are subject to potential flashback and internal explosion since flammable vapor/air mixtures may be formed in the stack or inlet piping by the entry of air, and the pilot constitutes a continuous ignition source. Flares are therefore always provided with flashback protection, which prevents a flame front from traveling back to the upstream piping and equipment. Design details are described later in this section.

DESIGN PROCEDURE S

ELEVATED FLARES Sizing of Elevated Flares - Sizing of flare systems is a function of maximum allowable back pressure on pressure relief valves and other sources of release into the emergency systems. Flare stack sizing and pressure drop is included with considerations of pressure drop through the pressure relief valve headers, blowdown drums, flare headers, seal drum, etc., as described in Section XV-C. Elevated flare tips incorporating various steam injection nozzle configurations (see Elevated Flare Tip Types and Steam Injection below) are normally sized for a velocity of 400 ft/s (120 m/s) at maximum flow, as limited by excessive noise and the ability of manufacturers to design tips which will ensure flame stability. This velocity is based on the inclusion of steam flow if injected internally, but the steam is not included if added through jets external to the main tip. Flared gas streams containing hydrogen can generally be flared at higher exit velocities. In these cases flare tip manufacturers should be consulted on higher velocity limitations. A summary of suitable types of elevated flare tips is provided by Table 2, along with details shown by Figures 1A-1D. Pressure drops for proprietary tips are obtainable from manufacturers' charts such as Figure 2. Available pressure drop may in some cases dictate acceptance of a lower maximum velocity, but at least 250 ft/s (75 m/s) is recommended to insure good dispersion. Flare tips consisting of a simple open-ended pipe with a single pilot are subject to flame lift-off and noise problems at high velocities, and should therefore be designed for a maximum velocity of 160 ft/s (50 m/s). Elevated Flare Location, Spacing and Height - Location, spacing and height of elevated flares are a function of permissible radiant heat densities, possible burning liquid fall-out, and pollution considerations. Design requirements are as follows: 1. Flares should be at least as high as any platform or building within 500 ft (150 m) horizontally, and in no case less than 50 ft (15 m) high. 2. Any source of ignitable hydrocarbons, such as separators or floating roof tanks, should be at least 200 ft (60 m) from the base of the flare stack, assuming the potential for liquid fall-out from the flare is minimal. Burning liquid fall-out from a flare can present extremely hazardous situations should ignitable hydrocarbons lie within the fall-out area. New facilities should be designed per this section and Section XV-D to minimize the potential for burning liquid fall-out. For existing facilities that have a history of burning liquid fall-out or that are known to have design deficiencies (e.g., undersized blowdown drum, low points in the flare header where liquid can accumulate, long distances between the blowdown or seal drum to the flare, etc.) which will increase the probability of liquid entrainment to the flare, modifications should be made to reduce the potential for and/or reduce the impact of burning liquid fall-out. Until such modifications can be made, no new sources of ignitable hydrocarbons should be located close to the flare. In such situations, the 200 ft (60 m) spacing mentioned above may be inadequate. Drift distances of burning liquid droplets from an inadequately designed flare system can be considerably greater than 200 ft (60 m). 3. Flares should be located to limit the maximum ground level heat density to 500 Btu/hr/ft2 (1.6 kW/m2) at any property line. The minimum distance from the base of the flare stack to the property line should be 200 ft (60 m). 4. Flare elevation and spacing must be such that permissible radiant heat densities for personnel at grade and on elevated structural platforms are not exceeded under conditions of maximum heat release. The appropriate calculation procedures and personnel exposure criteria are described in Appendix A. In some special cases, flare elevation and spacing may be governed by radiant heat exposure of certain vulnerable items of equipment, rather than personnel. 5. Flare location and height must be such as to meet all applicable regulatory standards of noise level (refer to Environmental Control, Section IV) and atmospheric pollution by combustion products. Elevated Flare Tip Types and Steam Injection - A simple open tip with no steam injection is used when there are no limitations on smoke emission and luminosity.

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES EXXON ENGINEERING

DESIGN PRACTICES Section

Page

XV-E PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

7 of 60

Date December, 1999

DESIGN PROCEDURE (Cont) Flare tips incorporating steam injection are used where smoke emission and luminosity must be minimized. Generally, tip selection and steam injection capacity are designed to give smokeless operation at flare gas rates up to about 20% of design, since this will cover a large proportion of releases in a typical plant. The economics of providing continuously available reserve steam capacity for higher loads is prohibitive unless special pollution regulations apply. The required steam to hydrocarbon ratio for smokeless operation is a complex function of gas composition, hydrogen to carbon ratio, degree of saturation, tip pressure drop, tip diameter steam pressure, and flare exit velocity. Nominal steam rates at 200 ft/s (60 m/s) exit velocity for a typical proprietary flare tip are shown in Figure 3 for guidance. Significantly higher or lower steam ratios may be required for different tip designs and gas composition. Therefore, definitive steam ratios should be obtained on a case by case basis from flare tip vendors. In some cases steam control consists of a flow ratio controller with adjustable ratio set point, related to flare gas flow. The ratio adjustment, located in the control house, provides for the higher steam ratios necessary at low flaring rates. More recently successful applications of infrared smoke control have been used - see under REDUCING FLARE PULSING AND NOISE later in this section. Manual smoke control is also possible using TV monitors in the operating control room. Flare gas measurement is covered below under FLARE GAS METERING. If necessary, continuously vented surplus lowpressure steam may be used for smoke control at low flaring rates, with high-pressure steam cutting in through the flow ratio controller for larger releases. Injection of steam introduces an additional source of noise, and an effective flare tip is one which achieves a good balance of smoke and luminosity reduction without exceeding acceptable noise levels. Low-frequency noise is encountered at relatively high steam to hydrocarbon ratios. A flare performance chart, if available for the hydrocarbon being flared, may provide additional guidelines for flare tip design. Figure 4 shows a provisional performance chart for propane, based on experimental data, which defines the design envelope of exit velocities and steam ratios necessary to avoid smoke formation, excessive noise, flame boilover (flame-lick) and flame lift-off. Various designs of flare tip incorporating features such as central steam injection, an annular ring of steam nozzles, internal airinspirating steam nozzles, windshields, etc., are available from a number of vendors. Details of suitable types from which selection may be made are given in Table 2, along with typical design details provided by Figures 1A-1D. Other flare tip details: 1. Incoloy 800 and Type 310 Stainless Steel are the recommended materials for flare tips. It should be noted that Alloy 800 should be used rather than Alloy 800H. The former grade has superior high temperature ductility properties. 2. Length of flare tip is normally 10 ft (3 m). 3. A maintenance platform should be provided at the bottom of the flare tip (at the flange), with access by means of a caged ladder with intermediate platforms, in accordance with IP 4-2-1. Access onto the ladder should be permitted only when the flare is out of service. Elevated Flare Pilots and Igniters - Proprietary flare tips are normally provided with the manufacturer's recommended igniter and pilot system. Typically, one to four pilots are used depending on flare tip type and diameter. The forced air supply type of igniter system described below under FLARE PILOTS AND IGNITERS is preferred. It is recommended that controls be located at a distance from the base of the flare such that pilot ignition can be readily observed, subject to a minimum of 25 ft (7.5 m). Since pilot nozzles are small, strainers are needed to prevent plugging.

S

MULTIJET FLARES Capacity of Multijet Flares - In most cases, the economics of providing a multijet flare sized to handle the entire release from the largest design contingency are prohibitive, because of the low frequency of such major releases. Instead, it is designed to handle a proportion of the maximum flow, typically 20%, so that releases up to this level will be relatively smokeless and nonluminous. To further reduce smoking, steam injection at rates of 0.3 lb steam/lb gas (0.3 kg steam/kg gas) may be provided. This will cover a large proportion of releases in a typical plant, but variations on this sizing basis may be dictated by considerations of the number and type of upstream process units, type and probability of major release contingencies, atmospheric pollution restrictions, and cost of the flare facilities. An over-capacity line to an elevated flare is provided to handle the excess flow when the flaring rate exceeds the capacity of the multijet flare. The over-capacity flare is normally not provided with steam injection, and smoke formation is accepted during the infrequent occasions when it discharges. The over-capacity line and flare is normally designed to handle the entire maximum flow so that it can spare the multijet flare when the latter is shut down for maintenance.

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

DESIGN PRACTICES Section

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES

Page

XV-E 8 of 60 Date December, 1999

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

EXXON ENGINEERING

DESIGN PROCEDURE (Cont) Spacing of Multijet Flares - Recommended minimum spacings for heat releases between 300 x 106 and 1 x 109 Btu/hr (90300 MW) are given below. For heat releases outside this range, a special study must be made. 1. Clearance from property lines: 200 ft (60 m). 2. Clearance from structures higher than the flare stack: 200 ft (60 m). In addition, no structure where personnel access may be required while the multijet flare is in operation shall exceed in height a projected diagonal line from the base of the flare stack to the top of the stack wall diametrically opposite. 3. Clearance from structures lower than the flare stack: 150 ft (45 m). 4. Clearance from refinery roads and pipe bands: 75 ft (22.5 m). 5. Clearance from the elevated over-capacity flare must comply with radiant heat spacing requirements for elevated flares, considering personnel exposure when maintenance work is being performed on the multijet flare and the over-capacity flare is taking full design load. Clearance should be sufficient to allow personnel to evacuate promptly to a safe location. This clearance should not, however, be less than 100 ft (30 m).

S

STACK DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS FOR MULTIJET FLARES (SEE FIGURE 6) Dimensions - The inside diameter of the stack is based on the rate of heat release at design capacity, in accordance with the following equation: D = 0.83

Q

(Customary)

D = 0.47 Q where: D Q

(Metric) = =

Eq. (1) Eq. (1)M

Stack inside diameter, ft (m) Heat release at design flaring rate, millions Btu/hr (MW) (Based on lower heating value)

For stack diameters up to 25 ft (7.5 m) the stack height is normally 50 ft (15 m) above grade. The bottom of the stack is elevated to allow air for combustion to enter. The minimum clearance between the bottom of the stack and grade is either 6 ft (1.8 m) or 0.3 D, whichever is greater. Insulation - The steel shell of the stack is lined for its entire length with monolithic type castable refractory. Windbreaker - A windbreaker is necessary to prevent the wind from extinguishing the flames. It serves also to hide the flames. Since a solid wall produces undesirable eddies, a louvered type is used. The windbreaker is octagonal and is placed 8 ft (2.4 m) from the stack. The height should be at least 2 ft (0.6 m) more than the stack clearance. The slats should be at least 9 in. (225 mm) wide and overlap by at least 2 in. (50 mm). They should slope 45° to direct the flow of air downward on the inside of the enclosure. Four access doors are provided in the windbreaker, equally spaced around the periphery. The area below the stack and windbreaker is paved with concrete, surrounded by a 8 in. (200 mm) curb, and graded to a central drain point from which a drain line is routed to a manhole in a vented section of the oily water sewer. The water inlet should be sealed and the manhole should be located at least 50 ft (15 m) from the windbreaker. Burner Design and Back Pressure for Multijet Flares - The "burner" consists of a large number of small burner jets, arranged in a grid pattern inside the stack, near the bottom. To increase the rangeability of the burners, a two-stage piping system is provided, such that one set of burners handles low flows and the second set cuts in as the gas flow rate increases. 1. Staging Design - A single-stage multijet burner has a turndown ratio (maximum smokeless flaring rate/minimum flaring rate) of about 10:1. A two-stage burner therefore has a maximum turndown ratio of 100:1. In an actual two-stage design, the first stage is designed to handle about 20% of the design load of the multijet flare. Although this reduces the overall turndown ratio to about 50:1, it permits a large overlap between the maximum burning rate of the first stage and the minimum burning rate of the second. The overlap is desirable for smooth operation. The first stage burner grid should extend full width with the tube ends near the pilot to more readily promote ignition at very low flaring rates. A simple sequential water seal system with two seal drums is used to control the distribution of flare gas to the two stages and to provide flashback protection, as illustrated in Figure 5. The seal in the over-capacity line is designed to start releasing when the pressure in the second stage burner header reaches a value corresponding to maximum design flow to the multijet flare. Design of the seal drums, loop seals, disposal of effluent seal water, etc., follows the procedure described below for elevated flares under FLASHBACK PROTECTION FOR FLARE SYSTEMS, with the following exceptions: a.

Vapor inlet dipleg submergence is selected to control progressive operation of the stages. indicated in Figure 5.

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

Typical values are

DESIGN PRACTICES

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES EXXON ENGINEERING

Section

Page

XV-E PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

9 of 60

Date December, 1999

DESIGN PROCEDURE (Cont) b.

2.

3.

The second stage seal drums should be vertical, to minimize its size, provided that the required slope up to the burners can be achieved. A butterfly valve in the line to the first stage seal drum limits the maximum flow to the first stage burner. The valve is set by observing the burners while flaring at design capacity. Once adjusted, the valve should be locked in position. Pressure indicators are specified to aid in making adjustments and in evaluating burner performance. Water manometers may be used in this service, but must be shut-off when not in use. Piping to Burners - First and second stage piping and headers, as well as the burner lines themselves, are sized to minimize pressure drop and velocity effects. Thus, maldistribution of flow to the burners will be minimized. The burner lines are fabricated from standard 4 in. (100 mm) pipe, and are arranged in a split grid layout with distribution headers and split feed lines on opposite sides, for both first and second stage burners. First and second stage headers must be sloped so that any condensate will drain back to the seal drums. However, the burner lines must be accurately installed in a horizontal plane. Size, Spacing and Number of Burner Jets - The jet nozzles are 15 in. (380 mm) lengths of 1 in. (25 mm) stainless steel pipe. They discharge vertically from the horizontal burner lines, which run across the bottom of the stack. The jet nozzles are not insulated. The number of jets is based on gas velocity. For 1 in. (25 mm) standard pipe, the recommended maximum velocity permits a flow rate of 2550 SCFH. (72.2 Sm3/h) of gas per jet. Expressed as an equation: N = 16.4 V (SCF/day)

(Customary)

N = 0.0139 V (Sm3/h)

(Metric)

Eq. (2) Eq. (2)M

where: N

=

Number of jets (N should be rounded off upward to a whole number)

V

=

Flare design capacity, millions SCF/day (Sm3/h)

The jets are laid out on an approximately square pitch, with spacings in both directions varying between roughly 18 and 24 in. (450 and 600 mm)*. A first approximation of the required spacing is obtained from Eq. (3): P1 = P2 = 10

D

P1 = P2 = 833

4.

(Customary)

N D

Eq. (3)

(Metric)

N

Eq. (3)M

where: P1

=

Center-to-center spacing of adjacent burner lines, in. (mm)

P2

=

Center-to-center spacing of jets along a burner line, in. (mm)

D

=

Inside diameter of stack [from Eq. (1)], ft (m)

This equation is based on a negligible wall effect. The design values of P1 and P2 must be determined from a scale drawing, which is made to allow the required number of jets to be installed in the available area. This area is restricted by the limitation that no jet should be placed closer than 12 in. (300 mm) from the inside wall of the stack. The spacing is also affected by air flow considerations (see below), which may require the layout to be modified. Air Flow - The capacity of a multijet flare to induce air flow must be calculated, to make sure that it is adequate to meet the maximum air flow requirement for smokeless combustion. [W a of Eq. (4) must ≥ W r of Eq. (5).] a.

Air Flow Capacity - The primary air flow rate which will be induced around each jet may be estimated from Eq. (4): 5. 7 A j Wa = A  1 + 10.9  o   AB 

 520   H1 1 − TS   2

 A  + 0.138 1 − o  A S 

2

(Customary)

Eq. (4)

*In the case of a low heating value flare gas (less than about 1000 Btu/SCF (37 MJ/m3) HHV @ std. condition) which requires relatively little air, this spacing may be as low as a minimum of 15 in. (380 mm).

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

DESIGN PRACTICES Section

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES

Page

XV-E 10 of 60 Date December, 1999

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

EXXON ENGINEERING

DESIGN PROCEDURE (Cont) or 2.02 x 10 −6 A j Wa =

2

 289   H1 1 − TS  

A  1 + 10.9  o  + 0.138  AB  where: Wa

b.

 A  1 − o   A S  

(Metric)

2

Eq. (4)M

=

Available primary air flow per jet, lb/hr (kg/s)

Aj

=

Net free flow area per jet, in.2 (mm2) = P2 (P1 - d)

d

=

Outside diameter of burner line (including insulation), in. (mm)

H1

=

Net stack height, ft (m)

TS

= Average stack gas temperature, °R (°K). This temperature depends on the heating value of the flare gas and the percent excess air. Assume that TS = 2800°F (1538°C) = 3260°R (1811°K). This should be close enough, since Eq. (4) is relatively insensitive to changes in TS.

Ao

=

Total free flow area for primary air, ft2 =

AB

=

Peripheral area between bottom of stack and grade, ft2 (m2)

AS

=

Total inside cross-sectional area of stack, ft2 (m2)

N Aj  2 N Aj  m =  144  106 

Note: Eq. (4) has a partially theoretical origin, based on the pressure drops through the three successive major restrictions to air flow through the flare, i.e., the cylindrical area under the stack, the burner grid, and the stack itself. However, the constants have been determined from actual performance data on two flares, of 6 ft (1.8 m) and 30 ft (9.2 m) diameter. Air Flow Requirement - The primary air flow rate per jet necessary for smokeless combustion depends on the molecular weight and degree of unsaturation of the flare gas. Experience indicates that it varies linearly with percent unsaturates, from a minimum of 20% excess air for a flare gas containing 0% unsaturates to 35% excess air for a gas containing 67 mol% unsaturates. Based on this relationship and a design gas flow rate of 2550 SCFH (72.2 m3/h) per jet, the required primary air flow rate can be calculated directly from the gas composition or approximated conservatively from Eq. (5): Wr = 120 M + 56 yu + 22 M yu + 300

(Customary)

Eq. (5)

or Wr = 1.26 x 10-4 [120 M + 56 yu + 22 M yu + 300] where: Wr =

(Metric)

Eq. (5)M

Required primary air flow rate, lb/hr (kg/s) per jet, for a gas flow rate of 2550 SCFH (72.2 m3/h) per jet

M

=

Molecular weight of flared gas

yu

=

Mole fraction unsaturates in flared gas

If W r > W a, it will be necessary to modify the burner layout in order to provide more air flow area per jet. If necessary, the stack diameter must be increased. (Another possibility is reducing the piping diameter, if pressure drop is not limiting.) The value of W r calculated from the gas composition or from Eq. (5) should be considered to be a minimum requirement. A multijet flare should be designed with a calculated air capacity W a as high as possible, as limited by practical considerations of geometry and economics.

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES EXXON ENGINEERING

DESIGN PRACTICES Section

Page

XV-E PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

11 of 60

Date December, 1999

DESIGN PROCEDURE (Cont) Stack Gas Temperature - The average stack gas temperature, TS, which is required in Eq. (4) for calculation of W a has to be estimated. [An assumed value of 2800°F (1538°C) is recommended.] It can be checked as follows: i. Calculate the percent excess air which corresponds to the value of W a calculated per Eq. (4). ii. Find the chart (Figure 7, 8, 9 or 10 of Section VIII-M, Combustion Design Data) which most nearly corresponds to the heating value of the flare gas. iii. The intersection of the curve for the percent excess air in question with the abscissa (heat available = 0) is the stack temperature, TS. iv. If this value of TS differs from the assumed value by 300°F (149°C) or less, the change in W a will be less than 1%. Flameholder - Flameholders are necessary to prevent the flame from "riding" up to the top of the stack. They provide a surface at which burning can take place and also promote better mixing of air and gas by the additional turbulence which they cause above the jets. Construction is simply a solid, 1 in. (25 mm) diameter rod of refractory material (silicon carbide) supported horizontally above each burner line. The bottom of the rod should be 1/2 in. (13 mm) above the tips of the jets. Typical flameholder support details are shown in Figure 6A. Critical Burner Dimensions - The position of the flameholders and burner lines relative to the bottom of the stack is critical for efficient operation. For example, the multijet flare has a turndown ratio of 10:1 when the flameholder centerline is 5 in. (125 mm) below the bottom of the stack but only 2:1 when it is 6 in. (150 mm) above the bottom of the stack. Critical dimensions are shown in Figure 6A. Burner Insulation - The burner lines should be insulated with a 1 in. (25 mm) layer of castable insulation. Pilots and Igniters - Duplicate continuous gas pilots are required at each side of the flare, corresponding to the split burner grid layout. Selection of pilot and igniter systems follows the guidelines described below under FLARE PILOTS AND IGNITERS, and the controls should be located 50 to 100 ft (15 to 30 m) from the windbreaker.

c.

5.

6.

7. 8.

Because of the potential hazard of release of unignited hydrocarbons at ground level, a flame detection system, e.g., scanner, flame rod, TI / TLA, with alarm in the control house is included for each pilot. If an ultra violet detector is used, the flame scanner must be located so that interference of ultra violet rays from the main flame or other sources do not cause false readings. Mount ultra violet detectors looking straight down through the pilots toward the ground. Provide strainers in each gas or oil line to pilots. 9. Steam Injection - While the multijet flare will achieve a significant reduction in the smoke produced, it does not provide true smokeless combustion over its full operating range. This is particularly true with the heavier (C4+) and unsaturated gases. Steam injection at a rate of about 0.3 lb steam per lb of gas (0.3 kg of steam/kg of gas) will provide an additional reduction in smoke for most gases. Steam should be injected into the flare gas either upstream or downstream of the burner nozzles, according to the burner design. 10. Materials - In selection of materials for burner grid, stack lining, and piping inside the windbreaker, temperature rise due to heat radiation from the flame should be evaluated. A flare tip refractory lining should be provided, as shown in Figure 6A.

S

BURNING-PIT FLARES Burning-pit flares can handle flammable liquids or gases or mixtures of the two. A typical design is shown in Figure 7. A circular pit is illustrated, but any convenient shape may be used. The burning pit is simply a shallow earth-or concrete-surfaced pool area enclosed by a dike, with a liquid/vapor inlet pipe through the wall, and provided with pilots and igniters. While the design basis below is adequate for handling emergency releases, a more conservative approach is recommended for continuous flaring services, incorporating up to twice the calculated pit area. Burning Pit Flare Sizing - The burning-pit area is sized to provide sufficient surface to vaporize and burn liquid at a rate equal to the maximum incoming liquid rate. The calculation procedure is as follows: 1. Determine the linear regression rate of the liquid surface (i.e., the rate at which the liquid level would fall as a result of vaporization by radiant heat from the burning vapor above it, assuming no addition of incoming liquid): R = 0.003

LHV Hv

R = 0.00127

LHV Hv

(Customary)

(Metric)

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

Eq. (6)

Eq. (6)M

DESIGN PRACTICES Section

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES

Page

XV-E 12 of 60 Date December, 1999

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

EXXON ENGINEERING

DESIGN PROCEDURE (Cont) 2.

Determine the pit area necessary to vaporize and burn liquid at a rate equal to the liquid input rate: A =

0 .2 m ; R ρL

A =

1001 m R ρL

where: LHV =

(Customary)

(Metric)

Eq. (7)

Eq. (7)M

Lower Heating Value of incoming vapor and vaporized liquid, Btu/lb (kW/kg). Pit area required to vaporize and burn liquid, ft2 (m2).

A

=

m

= Rate of vaporization and burning of liquid, lb/hr (kg/s) (selected as equal to the rate of flashed liquid entering the pit).

R

=

Linear regression rate of liquid surface, in./min (mm/s).

ρL

=

Liquid density, lb/ft3 (kg/m3).

Hv

=

Liquid latent heat of vaporization, Btu/lb (kJ/kg).

3.

The dike wall height above the water level is selected to provide holdup capacity for the largest liquid release resulting from a single contingency during 30 minutes, plus 18 in. (450 mm) freeboard. The liquid rate is based on the actual flashed liquid entering the pit, assuming no burning or further vaporization in the pit. The height of the dike wall above the water level should not, however, be less than 4 ft (1.2 m). Spacing of Burning Pit Flares - Spacing is based upon radiant heat considerations at maximum heat release, using a simplified calculation procedure, as follows: D =

FQ 4π K

where: D Q K F

Eq. (8) = = = =

Distance from flame to point under consideration, ft (m). Total heat released by liquid and vapor, Btu/hr (kW). Radiant heat density, Btu/hr ft2 (kW/m2). Fraction of heat radiated. Refer to Appendix A for appropriate values of F.

The center of the flame is assumed to be 1-1/2 pool diameters from the center of the pool at a 45° elevation, in the direction of the point where radiant heat density is being considered. This assumption is used to allow for flame deflection by wind. Permissible radiant heat densities for personnel are described in Appendix A and later in this section. In some special cases, spacing may be governed by radiant heat exposure of certain vulnerable items of equipment, rather than personnel. Radiant heat density at the property line must not exceed 500 Btu/hr ft2 (1.6 kW/m2). In addition, the following minimum spacings apply to burning pit flares: •

500 ft (150 m) from property lines, roadways, or any process or storage facilities.

• 200 ft (60 m) from any source of ignitable hydrocarbons, such as separators or floating roof tanks. Valves in the inlet, seal water and pilot gas lines should be located according to permissible radiant heat densities for personnel, as defined in Appendix A, consistent with being able to carry out emergency actions. Piping to the burning pit should be suitably protected against flame impingement (e.g., by installation below grade). Inlet Piping and Flashback Protection - In non-freezing climates, for services where incoming liquid or vapor hydrocarbon temperatures do not fall below 32°F (0°C), flashback protection is provided by submerging the inlet below a layer of water in the bottom of the pit. The top of the inlet distributor is 4 in. (100 mm) below the water level, and the bottom of the distributor is 6 in. (150 mm) above the bottom of the pit. A continuous flow of at least 20 gpm (1.3 dm3/s) of makeup water into the pit is provided, with the level maintained by an overflow seal discharging to the oily water sewer. Higher water rates may be required on account of ground seepage or evaporation during maximum release conditions. For services where ambient or inlet temperatures may fall below 32°F (0°C), flashback protection is provided by a special seal drum or loop seal in the inlet line. This equipment is designed specifically for the particular liquid and vapor materials being flared. In these cases a 6 in. (150 mm) minimum water layer is included in the bottom of the pit to prevent oil seepage into the ground, and the hydrocarbon inlet distributor is mounted 6 in. (150 mm) above the water surface. Details of the inlet distributor are shown in Figure 7. EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES EXXON ENGINEERING

DESIGN PRACTICES Section

Page

XV-E PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

13 of 60

Date December, 1999

DESIGN PROCEDURE (Cont) Pilots and Igniters - Two gas-fired pilots with igniters are installed adjacent to the inlet distributor. As described below under FLARE PILOTS AND IGNITERS, the igniter assembly and pilot gas valves must be located remote from the flare for protection of personnel and equipment. This restricts igniter selection to the forced air supply type. Location of these components should be such that the calculated radiant heat density at maximum load does not exceed permissible levels for personnel exposure. Because of the potential hazard of release of unignited hydrocarbons at ground level, a flame scanner (suitably shielded and air-cooled and connected to an alarm in the control house) is provided for each pilot.

S

FLARE PILOTS AND IGNITERS - ALL FLARES All flares must be provided with continuous pilots to ensure combustion of any releases discharged to them, and to prevent flame-out. Various designs of pilot burner are available, and proprietary tips for elevated flares are normally provided complete with pilots. In addition, an ignition system is required for igniting the pilots when a flare is commissioned. Various proprietary flame front igniters are available, which function by the application of an electrical spark to a gas/air mixture in an ignition chamber, and allowing the resulting flame front to travel through an igniter tube which terminates with an open end adjacent to the pilot burner tip. In some designs, to improve the reliability of achieving ignition, the igniter tube ignites a raw gas on-off pilot burner provided with a special wide-angle tip, which in turn ignites the continuous pilot. Air to the ignition chamber may be inspirated through a gas-operated venturi, which is designed to provide the correct gas/air mixture, but this type does not function reliably when horizontal igniter tube runs exceed 20 to 30 ft (6 to 9 m). The ignition chamber and igniter tube venturi must therefore be placed close to the flare, i.e., at the base of an elevated flare or adjacent to the windbreaker of a multijet flare. Remote operation of the ignition controls may however be achieved by locating the spark ignition pushbutton and the igniter gas and pilot gas valves at any required distance from the flare. The inspirating system is not, however, acceptable for burning-pit flares since, even with remote control, the ignition chamber and venturis, etc. would be subject to damage by overheating. An alternative design uses a compressed air supply (from the instrument air header) for the ignition chamber, the gas/air mixture being controlled by restriction orifices. The flame front passes through an igniter tube as for the inspirating type, but there are no limitations on horizontal distance from the flare, and the igniter assembly may therefore be located remotely. The forced air supply type of igniter system is preferred for all flare applications. When pilot and igniter systems for flares are being selected available proprietary systems may be considered but the choice should be based upon proven satisfactory operating experience. The John Zink Flame Front Generator, which uses an instrument air supply to the ignition chamber, is typical of the igniter systems most frequently applied during recent years. It is illustrated in Figure 8. Flares, which depend only on PHA and PLA alarms in the pilot gas supply to indicate the pilots are lit, should be Priority 1 alarms which have dedicated alarms in the control room. For flares using thermocouples to verify pilot flame, such as used on a H2S flare, the use of PHA and PLA instrumentation in the pilot fuel gas supply is not required. However, the thermocouples should be equipped with Priority 2 alarms. Reliability of flare pilots has been a problem at some installations when using a 45 scfh fuel supply. Plugging of the in-line strainers has occurred and it is recommended that such in-line strainers be removed prior to pilot installation. For these problem installations, the strainers were not accessible without a flare shut down and the strainer mesh was too fine for the service. Filtering of the fuel should be done at grade and cartridge filters have been used to provide adequate protection. Testing of the pilots prior to installation is strongly recommended since the primary air setting may not be valid if site location is different from factory location. Pilot tip temperature must be above the ignition temperature of the fuel and testing will confirm that the desired tip temperature of 1500°F (816°C) is achieved. Use of 80 scfh pilots appears to be adequate to ensure flame stability, and is recommended. Gas pilots must be provided with a reliable source of gas, which will remain available under any single contingency such as power or air failure. Pilots should be designed for the anticipated gas composition, which should be reasonably constant. An alternative means of igniting flare gas is to use direct electronic ignition, instead of continuous pilots. This has been attempted over the years but was hampered by a variety of problems. These were corrosion, erosion, melt-down, and carbon build-up problems associated with the electrodes. Successful flare ignition is highly dependent on the position of the electrodes. There could be flaring conditions where the arc would not ignite the discharging gas because the flare gas/air mixture at the electrodes was either over-rich or too lean. Before specifying an electronic ignitor, a thorough investigation should be conducted to determine the reliability of such devices.

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

DESIGN PRACTICES Section

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES

Page

XV-E 14 of 60 Date December, 1999

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

EXXON ENGINEERING

DESIGN PROCEDURE (Cont) S

FLASHBACK PROTECTION FOR FLARE SYSTEMS All flares must be provided with flashback protection to prevent a flame front from traveling back to the upstream piping and equipment. A number of different flashback seal designs are available, of which the seal drum is used in nearly all applications. Details are as follows: Seal Drum - A typical flare seal drum for an elevated flare stack is illustrated in Figure 9A (Figure 9B - Metric). (Seal arrangements for multijet flares and burning pits were covered earlier in the section.) With a continuous flow of water to the seal drum, loss of level downstream of the baffle is not possible. Condensed hydrocarbon may accumulate downstream of the baffle and skimming connections should be provided. The need for a LHA and LLA in the drum is not needed because the level downstream of the baffle is determined by the height of the seal leg. A baffle maintains the normal water level, and the vapor inlet is submerged 3 to 4 in. (75 to 100 mm). Drum dimensions are designed such that a 10 ft (3 m) slug of water is pressured back into the vertical inlet piping in the event of flashback, thus preventing the explosion from propagating further upstream. The inlet piping or diplegs should have sufficient wall thickness to withstand an internal explosion and should be good for 50 psig (345 kPa), or consistent with the drum internal design pressure. The vapor space is sized to avoid water entrainment into the flare gas. The vapor residence time in the drum should allow larger liquid droplets to fall to the liquid surface. The method used follows API 521. The vapor space velocity as measured through the vertical cross-sectional area above the baffle level (see Figure 9) determines the residence time. The liquid “dropout velocity” is determined as follows:

➧

Uc = 1.15 where: Uc ρL ρv D g C

g D (ρL − ρv ) ρv C = = = = = =

Eq. (9)

Dropout liquid velocity, ft/sec (m/s). Liquid density, lb/ft3 (kg/m3) at operating conditions (water). Vapor density, lb/ft3 (kg/m3) at operating conditions. Liquid particle diameter, ft (m). Acceleration due to gravity 32 ft/s2 (9.8 m/s2). Drag coefficient (see figure in Section XV-D for drag coefficient).

The droplet size should be selected as follows for normal contingencies: 1. 600 microns for new/existing facilities. 2. The vapor velocity should be limited to 25 ft/s (7.6 m/s) or less in all cases. 3. The depth of the vapor space should be no less than 20% of the drum diameter or 12 in. (300 mm), whichever is greater. For remote contingencies: 1. The droplet size may increase to 1000 microns for all cases. 2. The vapor velocity should be limited to 25 ft/s (7.6 m/s) or less in all cases. The former seal drum designs included a serrated edge at the base of the dipleg (see Detail A, Figure 9). Intermittent bubbling through the seal dipleg sometimes causes problems of flame pulsation, low frequency noise and/or smoke pollution. The alternative is to design using successive diplegs as shown in Figure 5 plus the non-pulsing sparger shown in Figure 12 and discussed in subsequent paragraphs. Seal water should be taken from a reliable source (firemain water may be permissible, per Section XV-I). Salt water should not be used where flare gas components would cause deposition of solids. Winterizing should be provided if required by IP 3-9-1. At some locations, which experience extremely cold weather, e.g., Strathcona, a recirculation glycol system is used. The vertical downflow section of the water outlet line from the drum is sized for a maximum velocity of 0.4 ft/s (0.12 m/s), to allow entrained gases to disengage. The seal loop should be sized for the design water flow. 20 gpm (1.3 dm3/s) has been used as a guideline in the past. The make-up water rate must be sufficient to compensate for drum purge and evaporation. The maximum make-up rate assumes that the drum is empty after a blow and should be high enough to reestablish the seal within a reasonable time after each flaring incident. However, the seal must be reestablished before the ingress of air reaches the seal drum. Air ingress occurs as the system cools down after a pressure release. Where higher water rates are considered necessary then facilities for manually increasing the make up should be provided. The seal depth is equivalent to 175% of the maximum drum operating pressure, subject to a minimum of 10 ft (3 m). A seal depth of 110% of the maximum operating pressure is permitted when applying the "1.5 times design pressure" rule to remote contingencies. (See Section XV-C.)

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES EXXON ENGINEERING

DESIGN PRACTICES Section

Page

XV-E PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

15 of 60

Date December, 1999

DESIGN PROCEDURE (Cont) The drum is normally gunite-lined for corrosion control and must be designed to meet all the following combinations of extreme temperature and pressure requirements: 1. A design pressure of 50 psig (345 kPa) at the highest possible operating temperature of the entering vapors resulting from a single contingency. For those hydrocarbons typically encountered in refinery operations, this design pressure should adequately protect the drum against an internal explosion. This design pressure must also be applied to the flare stack and the water outlet seal loop. However, for those locations which may flare streams containing more than 75% by volume ethylene, a design pressure of 150 psig (1035 kPa) should be used. 2. A design pressure of 50 psig (345 kPa) at the lowest possible operating temperature of the entering vapors resulting from a single contingency. Credit may be taken for heat transfer to the atmosphere from the flare header upstream of the seal drum when determining the lowest and highest temperatures of the entering vapors. A flare seal drum may also serve as a sour water disengaging drum, if economically advantageous. In such cases, special care is needed to insure the drum is adequately sized to simultaneously meet all design features required for both functions. Also a separate source of makeup water must still be provided to ensure continuity of the seal. Disposal of the effluent water is discussed under Disposal of Seal Water below. The drum is provided with steam injection if required for winterizing or cold releases, per Figure 9. If winterizing is called for by IP 3-9-1, then the steam should be temperature-controlled to maintain the seal water temperature at 40 to 50°F (4 to 10°C). Oil skimming connections should be provided to remove accumulated oil, carried over from the blowdown drum, to the seal drum. Details are shown in Figure 9. The seal drum should be located a minimum practical distance from the flare. Gas Purge - Although not normally recommended as an alternative to a water seal, a continuous hydrocarbon gas purge may be used to provide protection against internal burning or flashback explosion which might result from air backing down from the flare tip at zero or low flaring rates. Application of this method is limited to cases where a continuous low-cost gas supply is available, where there are no public relations or atmospheric pollution objections to continuous flaring, and where problems that would be associated with a water seal (e.g., freezing up by cold vapors) can thereby be avoided. The purge gas must be non-fouling and the source must be reliable and assured during any single contingency such as power or air failure. Purge rate (controlled by restriction orifice) must be calculated in accordance with the procedure described for purging atmospheric vent stacks in Section XV-B. Dry Seals - Various proprietary dry seals are available, such as the John Zink Molecular Dry Seal (illustrated in Figure 10) and the National Air-Oil Fluidic Seal (shown in Figure 11). They may be used in conjunction with a gas purge system when the purge gas is lighter than air. The molecular dry seal functions by trapping a volume of the light gas in the internal inverted compartment, thus preventing air from displacing light gas in the flare stack by buoyancy effects. The fluidic dry seal utilizes the kinetic properties of the gases to prevent movement of air down the flare. The continuous purge flow requirements for these dry seals may be 30-60% of the open stack purge rates as determined from Figure 1 of Section XV-B. The vendor should be contacted to determine their specific recommendation for each proposed installation. This reduced purge requirement is the only incentive for installing a dry seal. In the case of heavier-than-air purge gas, there is no buoyancy mechanism causing air entry into the stack, and there is thus no incentive to include a dry seal. Unlike a water seal, a dry seal cannot prevent a flashback from traveling upstream if a combustible mixture has been formed by the entry of air into the pressure relief valve or flare headers. It only protects against internal burning flashback, which might result from air backing down from the flare tip at zero or low flaring rates. Dry seals are therefore not normally specified for new designs. The location of the John Zink Molecular Seal recommended by the manufacturer is approximately 11 ft (3.6 m) below the top of the flare. The NAO Fluidic Seal is located as close to the top of the tip as possible to eliminate the need for internal refractory. Disposal of Seal Water - Effluent water from water seals must be routed to safe means of disposal, considering possible hazards arising from liquid or vapor hydrocarbons or toxic materials that may be entrained or dissolved in the water. The separation of liquid hydrocarbons (formed by condensation in flare lines) in flare seal drums is discussed in Section XV-D. Seal water should be discharged as follows: 1. If H2S is never present in the flare gas, seal water effluent should be routed through an open funnel (to permit checking of seal water flow) to a manhole in a vented section of the oily water sewer. The water inlet to the manhole must be sealed.

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

DESIGN PRACTICES Section

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES

Page

XV-E 16 of 60 Date December, 1999

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

EXXON ENGINEERING

DESIGN PROCEDURE (Cont) 2.

3.

4.

If H2S in any concentration is intermittently present in the flare gas, seal water effluent should be routed through a closed connection (incorporating a sight glass for checking flow) to a manhole in a vented section of the oily water sewer. The water inlet to the manhole must be sealed. In addition, the seal drum should include a baffle (Detail B in Figure 9) to preferentially route the makeup water to the sewer, while confining H2S-saturated water to the drum. However, pollution considerations may make the routing of seal water to the sewer unacceptable, in which case disposal must follow method (3) below. If H2S is continuously present in the flare gas (see definition of "continuous" under FLARING OF H2S STREAMS, below), or if the flare seal drum also functions as a sour water disengaging drum, then the effluent seal water must be routed to a sour water stripper, desalter, or other safe means of disposal. Withdrawal from the drum is by pump in place of the normal loop seal arrangement. Two pumps are provided: one motor driven for normal use, and the other having a steam turbine drive for high level cut-in. Seal drum level is controlled by LIC with high and low alarm lights plus an independent high level alarm. Disposal of effluent water from multijet ground flare seal drums should comply with paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) above, except that: •

In (1), closed piping with a sight glass should be used rather than an open funnel.

• In (1) and (2), the manhole receiving effluent seal water should be located at least 50 ft (15 m) from the windbreaker. Flame Arresters - Flame arresters are not permitted as a means of flashback protection in flare systems.

REDUCING FLARE PULSING AND NOISE A major cause of pulsing in flare systems is flow surging in the water seal drum. This can be eliminated by providing a gas distributor in the seal drum. One of several reasons why it is important to eliminate pulsing is to reduce flare noise. Combustion flare noise has been shown to increase as the steam rate increases. Since the amount of steam required to suppress smoke in a flare is set by the flaring rate, flow surges will require a higher steam rate than for a steady flow. A past test at one of the Baton Rouge flares showed that through the elimination of seal drum pulsing, steam rates could be reduced by one third at about 20% of the flare capacity. At much higher steam rates than required to suppress smoke, flares occasionally exhibit another type of noise problem, a low frequency rumble that can be sensed in the surrounding community as vibrations. The over steaming of the flare produces pockets of uncombusted gases which then ignite sporadically. By reducing the steam requirement of a flare through eliminating flow surges, there is a greater operating margin between smokeless flaring and high steam rate associated rumble. The likelihood of over steaming a flare and causing noise problems can be reduced by providing automatic smoke control. Since neither the gas rate nor the gas composition to a flare is rarely constant, the required steam addition rate to a flare for optimum smoke control requires frequent adjustment. With manual addition of steam there will be occasions when a flare is receiving significantly more steam than is required for smoke suppression and low frequency rumbling noise may result. This is particularly likely at night when visual smoke control is difficult. Infrared techniques which rely on measuring radiation being emitted from soot particles and carbon monoxide emissions have been used at several Exxon locations. Experience varies from extremely poor in the case of Baytown Olefins Plant to very good at Baton Rouge Refinery. It would seem that the key to a successful automatic infrared smoke control system is to use a sensor which measures radiation in the 2.0-2.5 µ wavelength range. Raytek detectors are examples of such devices which sense radiation over this range and have been used successfully at several Exxon locations. Other advantages of eliminating pulsing are reduced steam costs, more accurate flow measurements possible with a steady flow, and reduced incidence of blowing and seal liquid. Also, the size of the seal drum can sometimes be reduced. Flow surges in the seal drum are generated by the cyclic formation of large bubbles as the flare gas is discharged into the drum. These pulsations can be virtually eliminated by the use of a horizontal sparger incorporating many small diameter holes arranged specifically to allow the open area to increase as flow increases. These holes must be spaced sufficiently far apart to avoid interference between bubbles. The specific design of the non-pulsing sparger distributor is shown in Figure 12. The hole arrangement was determined experimentally. Hole density is low at the top of the pipe and is increased lower on the pipe. The maximum open area density of about 10% assures reasonable bubble formation. The average velocity out of the top row of holes starts at about 130 ft (40 m/s) and increases as the pressure rises and total flow increases. Total areas of holes plus bottom slot should be equal to at least two times the cross sectional area of the inlet pipe.

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES EXXON ENGINEERING

DESIGN PRACTICES Section

Page

XV-E PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

17 of 60

Date December, 1999

DESIGN PROCEDURE (Cont) S

FLARING OF H2S STREAMS Continuous releases of concentrated H2S streams must be segregated in a separate flare system to limit the extent of fouling and plugging problems. Releases of H2S such as diversion of Amine Regeneration Unit sour gas product to flare during shutdown or upset of a downstream sulfur recovery unit are considered to be "continuous," but safety valve releases are not included in this category. Concentrated H2S pressure relief valve releases should be tied into the regular flare system rather than a segregated flare system for continuous releases, since the segregated H2S flaring system has a higher probability of fouling. Due to the nature of H2S one should plan on frequent inspection and flushing of H2S flares to remove scale and corrosion products. Preferably, the H2S flare system should consist of a segregated header and separate line routed up the side of a conventional elevated flare stack, sharing the same structure, but having separate pilots and igniters. However, the H2S header may be tied into the regular flare seal drum if there are special mechanical design problems associated with the separate stack, e.g., in the case of a flare, which is to be dismantled for overhaul. Flare elevation must be sufficient to meet atmospheric pollution and ground level concentration requirements for the sulfur dioxide produced. Incomplete or no combustion of flared hydrogen sulfide can lead to extremely dangerous situations because of the relatively low lethal concentration of hydrogen sulfide. Concentrated streams of hydrogen sulfide can be flared safely provided the following features are incorporated into the flare design (these features equally apply to those locations where a dedicated H2S flare is not available and concentrated H2S streams are handled via the regular hydrocarbon flare): •

It is absolutely essential that flare pilots be lit at all times. The flare pilots should be provided with a reliable source of fuel gas, a reliable forced air type igniter system and a means of automatic pilot flame verification such as thermocouples situated inside a thermowell which is located at the base of the pilot flame. Auto relight based on pilot verification is to be considered where manning may limit operator attention. The fuel gas used for the pilots should be clean and free of any appreciable quantities of condensables and should be provided with a pressure controller and high and low pressure alarms. Refer to Figure 8 for a typical pilot gas / igniter system design. If appreciable quantities of condensables in the fuel gas are likely, then a knock-out drum with a high level alarm should be provided. Piping should be self-draining back to the drum. At least three pilots should be provided where possible. For very small flares [less than 8 in. (200 mm) diameter], at least two pilot and igniter assemblies should be provided. For large flares [greater than 42 in. (1067 mm) diameter], at least 4 pilots should be provided. Each pilot burner should be rated for a minimum heat release of 80000 Btu/hr (23.4 kW). Individual pilot gas lines to the flare tip with isolation capability at grade should be provided to enable isolation of a burnt out pilot. A burnt out pilot may tend to preferentially take gas from the undamaged pilots, which could ultimately lead to their extinguishment.

•

The combustion characteristics of the flared gas must be high enough to ensure flame stability. Typical refinery H2S streams containing H2S, CO2 and water vapor are flammable without assist gas if the UFL is 30 vol. % or higher. If UFL is below 30 vol. %, it is recommended that assist fuel gas be added until the UFL is increased to 30 vol. % or the heating value increased to 500 Btu/SCF (5.2 kJ/Sm3). Hydrogen rich streams will increase the UFL and paraffin hydrocarbon streams will increase the heating value. Supplemental fuel gas, when required, should be automatically introduced (at the upstream end of the flare header for mixing and purging) via ratio control of the fuel gas stream to the measured flare header acid gas rate. Ratio control of fuel gas/acid gas should be a safety critical instrument.

•

To avoid flame "blow off," acid gas flare exit velocity, including any supplemental fuel gas, should be limited to 150 ft/sec (45 m/s).

•

Steam should not be added to acid gas while flaring because of the quenching effect it will have on the flame temperature. This can result in incomplete or no combustion. Hydrogen sulfide burns smokelessly as will any supplemental fuel gas (unless the fuel gas contains a very high level of unsaturated compounds). Thus, steam addition for smokeless flaring is normally not required.

•

The flare stack should be high enough that dangerous concentrations of uncombusted hydrogen sulfide are unlikely to accumulate at grade should the flare become extinguished or flaring efficiency drop off. For a given set of conditions, there will be a certain wind velocity and downwind distance from the stack that produce the highest ground level concentration, referred to as the critical ground level concentration. As a design guideline, the flare elevation should be such that the critical ground level concentration of hydrogen sulfide does not exceed 10 vppm over a one hour averaging time assuming none of the hydrogen sulfide entering the flare is converted to sulfur dioxide. In addition to meeting the critical ground level concentration criterion, the stack should be high enough that radiant heat levels at grade do not exceed 3,000 Btu/hr ft2 (9.45 kW/m2) at maximum release rate.

•

Mechanical reliability of the flare tip assembly should be maximized by providing features such as wind shields to protect the outside of the flare tip against damage from flamelick and internal refractory lining to protect against burning inside the flare tip at low flaring rates.

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

DESIGN PRACTICES Section

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES

Page

XV-E 18 of 60 Date December, 1999

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

EXXON ENGINEERING

DESIGN PROCEDURE (Cont) •

A potential problem with flaring acid gas is the deposition of ammonium bisulfide (NH3 + H2S) and ammonium bicarbonate (NH3 + CO2 + H2O) in the flare header and even at the base of the flare stack. The potential for such deposits depends on the temperature of the gas and the partial pressures of NH3, H2S, CO2 and H2O. Refer to Figures 13 and 14 for plots of ammonium bisulfide and ammonium bicarbonate deposition temperatures versus partial pressure. Any lines, including the flare header and flare stack, which are susceptible to the formation of such deposits should be heat traced and insulated to maintain stream temperatures at least 25°F (14°C) higher than the deposition temperature. As a minimum, the line temperature should be maintained above 120°F (49°C). An alternative to heat tracing and insulating the flare stack would be to provide water wash connections into the flare stack approximately 30 ft (9 m) above the acid gas header inlet. If protection of the stack via water wash is provided, it is imperative that routine washing be carried out. Flashback protection is required for H2S flaring systems, either by water seal or continuous gas purge, as described above under FLASHBACK PROTECTION FOR FLARE SYSTEMS. If a water seal is used, special requirements apply to the disposal of the effluent seal water. In the case of an H2S flaring system handling a flow of H2S which is uninterrupted throughout the period that a plant is in operation, and which stops only when the producing plant is shutdown, then flashback protection is not required. However, steam or inert gas connections are required to permit purging the flare line during start-up, shutdown and plant upsets.

SPARE FLARE CAPACITY CONSIDERATIONS Flare capacity must always be available for emergency releases that may occur from the upstream plant facilities which are in operation. Flaring rates corresponding to the design contingency basis of the facilities should be assumed. Thus, when a flare is taken out of service for maintenance, either spare capacity must be available in other flares connected to the same system, or the necessary upstream process units must be shutdown. The justification of spare flare capacity is therefore considered on the basis of an economic evaluation of the debits associated with plant downtime. As a means of providing spare flare capacity without rendering additional plot area unavailable for plant equipment, a double elevated flare arrangement is permissible. This consists of two flare stacks in a common supporting structure, each sized for the full design flow. Either stack can be dismantled and removed for maintenance while the other is in service. Appropriate platforms and radiation shielding are installed to provide safe working conditions for personnel during the dismantling and reassembly stages, but the mechanical design should be such that this work can be carried out without requiring access above an elevation of 50 ft (15 m).

FLARE GAS METERING Metering flare gas is important for loss accounting and for control of steam injection. A special requirement for flare gas meters is low-pressure drop and the ability to continue functioning in fouling conditions. The flare gas metering methods listed below have been used with varying degrees of success, or are under test or development. In view of the new techniques and developments in this field, reference should be made to the Control Systems Development Section of Exxon Engineering Technology Department for advice on selection of flow meters for flare gas service. Venturi Meter - Limited experience of this flow meter in flare gas service has been obtained. Its advantage is that it has a permanent head loss of only 5% of the measured pressure differential. This is the lowest AP of all orifice meter designs. Flow ratios as high as 1:10 (e.g., 1.0 to 10 lb/s) can be measured within + 2% of actual flow. Venturi meters are available in different materials and diameters up to 60 in. (1500 mm) from B.l.F. Industries, Providence, Rhode Island. Anemotherm - The Anemotherm, a hot wire anemometer, has been extensively applied to flare gas measurement and has been successfully used after modifications to reduce probe fouling. A technique used to reduce fouling is the installation of a steam coil around the tip of the probe, to prevent gases from condensing on the probe. The unmodified Anemotherm is available from the Anemostat Corporation of America, Scranton, Pennsylvania. Acoustic Flow Meter - Several Exxon locations now use the Panametrics ultrasonic flow meter. This meter was developed by Panametrics at Waltham, Massachusetts, USA in conjunction with Baytown Refinery. These meters use the differences in sound velocity to measure flow and density of the flared gases. A flow range from 0.02 to 30 ft/s (0.006 to 9 m/s) is possible with this meter.

S

PROTECTION AGAINST LOW AMBIENT OR FLARE GAS TEMPERATURES Flare systems must be protected against any possibility of partial or complete blockage by ice, hydrates, solidification, etc. The following design requirements should be included: International Practices - The requirements of IP 3-9-1 applying to pressure relieving systems, seal legs, bottom of flare stacks and seal drums, must be met.

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

DESIGN PRACTICES

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES EXXON ENGINEERING

Section

Page

XV-E PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

19 of 60

Date December, 1999

DESIGN PROCEDURE (Cont) Steam Injection - Seal Drums requiring winterizing under IP 3-9-1 should be provided with temperature-controlled steam injection to maintain the seal water temperature at 40 to 50°F (4 to 10°C), as described above under FLASHBACK PROTECTION FOR FLARE SYSTEMS. This limits the quantity of water vapor entering the flare stack. Steam Tracing - When winterizing is required by IP 3-9-1, the steam tracing and insulation should include the first 25 ft (7.5 m) of the flare stack above the vapor inlet; and also in the case of a drum seal, the vapor line from the seal drum to the flare. Where severe ambient conditions are encountered (such as at Strathcona where temperatures lower than -40°F (-40°C) have been encountered) then it is recommended that the entire seal drum and flare be insulated in addition to steam tracing and open steam injection at base of flare. Cold Gas Releases - Requirements for handling cold flare gas releases, such as by steam injection to the seal drum (shown in Figure 9), or by inline heaters, are covered in Section XV-C.

TABLE 1 COMPARISON OF FLARE TYPES

COMPARISON FACTORS Pollution Characteristics Smoke

ELEVATED FLARE

MULTIJET FLARE

BURNING PIT FLARE

Can be made smokeless except at high loads.

Relatively smokeless

Poor

Noise

Noisy, due to steam used for smoke reduction (compromise necessary).

Relatively quiet

Relatively quiet

Luminosity

High, but can be reduced with steam.

Some

Some

Air Pollution (odor)

Best obtainable, if elevation is adequate.

Poor dispersion, because of low elevation; severe problems if poor combustion or flameout.

Poor

Other Factors

Application

• High cost if high elevation.

•

High cost.

• Visual and noise pollution.

•

High maintenance requirement.

• Radiation requires wide spacing.

•

Odor pollution at low elevation.

• Low-cost and simple; but pollution is not acceptable in most cases.

•

Hazardous if flameout occurs.

• Wide spacing required.

• General choice for total flare load, or as over-capacity flare in conjunction with multijet flare.

• Use for base load or partial flaring rates if noise and visual pollution are critical.

• Generally the only acceptable flare where products of combustion or partial combustion are toxic or malodorous.

• Suitable only for "clean burning" gases, i.e. where products of combustion are not toxic or malodorous.

• Remote locations where no pollution requirements apply and space is available.

• Not suitable upwind of residential areas.

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

DESIGN PRACTICES Section

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES

Page

XV-E 20 of 60 Date December, 1999

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

EXXON ENGINEERING

TABLE 2 ELEVATED FLARE TIPS A. SMOKELESS TYPES GENERIC NAME Steam Ring

BASIC CONFIGURATION See Figure 1A

FEATURES Basic smokeless flare. Relatively simple to build. Design of steam nozzles varies among vendors. Center steam nozzle is sized for smokeless burning of purge gas (optional). Refractory generally disappears after several months of service. Steam injection system can be sized for steam pressures as low as 20 psig (140 kPa) at tip. External steam injection produces steam noise. Generally design for 1 psi (7 kPa) ∆P of flare gas at the tip, but can vary in both directions. Steam lines are usually sized for smokeless operation at up to 20% of peak flaring rate, but can vary from this if more steam is available. Wind loading is relatively low, since tip diameter is the same as the stack diameter.

VENDOR AND TYPE DESIGNATION National Airoil Burner Company, Inc. 1284 E. Sedgley Ave. Philadelphia, Pa. 19134 NRC tip S.A.M.I.A. 20129 Milano Viale L. Majno 26 Italy No type designation

COMMENTS All five vendors are competitive in price. Exxon has most experience with Zink tips. Low frequency noise has been experienced with these "Steam ring" type flare tips at low flaring rates.

John Zink Company 4401 South Peoria Tulsa, Okla. 74105 QS tip Flaregas Corporation 100 Airport Execute Park, Spring Valley, NY 10977 FHP tip

Cheapest type of smokeless flare.

Airoil-Flaregas P.O. Box 92, West Drayton, Middlesex UB78BE England

Combines steam ring with internal injection of steam and inspirated air.

John Zink Company

FHP tip Steam Ring and Steam Inspirating Air

See Figure 1B

SA-QS tip

Designed to use internal steam for smoke suppression at low flaring rates, with top ring cutting in at higher rates.

Low frequency noise has been experienced with this type of flare at high flaring rates.

Acoustic muffler is used around the lower steam manifold. Steam Inspirated Air

See Figure 1C

Coanda effect nozzles are used to inspirate air into the mixing chamber for the FS type.

Flaregas Corporation

In the FSX type, steam is used to inspirate air through steam injector units.

Airoil-Flaregas Ltd.

FSX design evolved from FS tip.

This was developed from the STF-SAS tip.

FS tip FSX tip

Both claim high efficiency use of steam and low steam noise. Complex nozzles are a high-cost component.

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

More expensive than “Steam Ring only” type of tips. Quieter than “Steam Ring only” tips. Used at some locations to reduce low frequency rumbling noise.

DESIGN PRACTICES

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES EXXON ENGINEERING

Section

Page

XV-E PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

21 of 60

Date December, 1999

TABLE 2 (Cont) ELEVATED FLARE TIPS A. SMOKELESS TYPES (Cont) GENERIC NAME Steam Inspirating Air

BASIC CONFIGURATION See Figure 1D

FEATURES Flare gas flows from the stack into the centerbody and then into spokes. Air flows between spokes. Basis for this design is jet engine afterburner technology.

VENDOR AND TYPE DESIGNATION Smoke-Ban Manufacturing, Inc. 711 E. Curtis Street Pasadena, Texas 77502

Air flow can be induced by steam injected at throat of venturi shroud or can have forced draft in an air stack concentric with the flare stack.

Models SVL SFL Steam SFH Inspirator SFLH

Flow control plates in spokes are potentially subject to fouling.

Models AVL AFL Forced AFH Draft AFLH

High aerodynamic loading. Typical shroud diameter is 88 in. (2235 mm) and height is 96 in. (2440 mm) for 24 in. (600 mm) diameter flare stack. Expensive sheet metal work.

Configurations vary in spoke flow control, nozzles vs. slots, etc.

Different designs for refinery & chem. plant flaring, purging of tankers, pipeline flaring, etc.

COMMENTS First major installation in U.S. (1968) was at Cities Service, Lake Charles, La. This tip was used for development work. Subsequent installations were for Continental Oil, Denver (1970) and Ponca City (1971). Two small tips were supplied to Humble Pipeline. No known installations at Exxon Refineries or Chemical Plants.

No refractory is used. Measured metal temperatures ~ 450°F (230°C) with steam flow. Center Steam

Sheet metal as for steam ring tip but no steam ring or nozzles. Steam emerges from the straight pipe concentric with the flare stack and terminating below the flare tip exit plane.

Coanda

Tulip shape to give Coanda profile to induce air.

Cheapest steam-injection flare tip.

ER&E

No longer being installed.

BP Flare Systems BP Trading Limited Chertsey Road Sunbury-on-Thames Middlesex, TW 16 7 LN England Indair Mardair

No known onshore Esso/Exxon installations. Supplier states experience in 5 to 300 million SCF/D (1.6 to 98 Sm3/s).

Steam jet emerges at high velocity and penetrates to the exit plane of the flare without mixing completely with flare gas. Results are intense steam noise (much greater than with steam ring for the same steam rate) and higher steam consumption than the steam ring.

Gas releases at base of elevated tulip create low-pressure region. Gas film follows Coanda profile, mixes with air, and is ignited by pilot.

B. NON-SMOKELESS TYPE GENERIC NAME Utility or Field Flare

BASIC CONFIGURATION Sheet metal as for steam ring tip but without steam ring or center steam.

FEATURES Cheapest flare tip. Produces trailing smoke even with natural gas.

VENDOR AND TYPE DESIGNATION John Zink Company U tip National Airoil Burner Co. NCG tip S.A.M.I.A. No type designation Flaregas Corporation FNH tip Airoil-Flaregas Ltd. FN tip

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

COMMENTS In view of emission, quality standards are now acceptable only for hydrogen flaring or nonsmoke producing gases.

DESIGN PRACTICES Section

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES

Page

XV-E 22 of 60 Date December, 1999

EXXON ENGINEERING

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

FIGURE 1A SMOKELESS ELEVATED FLARE TIP (STEAM RING TYPE)

Steam Nozzles

Perforated Flame Retention Ring Steam Ring

Alloy Tip, Typically Refractory Lining

310 SS or Incoloy 800

Center Steam Nozzle

Pilots and Igniters Not Shown Steam Line DP15EF1A

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES EXXON ENGINEERING

DESIGN PRACTICES Section

Page

XV-E PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

23 of 60

Date December, 1999

FIGURE 1B SMOKELESS ELEVATED FLARE TIP (STEAM RING AND INSPIRATED AIR TYPE)

Top Steam Ring Nozzles

Top Steam Ring Manifold

Internal Ducts Refractory

Path of Inspirating Air

Acoustic Muffler

Inspirating Steam Manifold

Center Steam Nozzle

Pilots and Igniters Not Shown

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

DP15EF1B

DESIGN PRACTICES Section

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES

Page

XV-E 24 of 60 Date December, 1999

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

EXXON ENGINEERING

FIGURE 1C SMOKELESS ELEVATED FLARE TIP (STEAM INSPIRATED AIR TYPE)

Windshield

Refractory

Air Inspirating Nozzles See Detail Below

Pilot and Igniter Lines

Center Steam Inlet

Main Steam Inlet

Entrained Air Entrained Air

Steam Steam

FS Type Inspirator (Steam Supplied Via Annular Slots - Uses Coanda Effect Nozzle)

FSX Type Air Inspirator (Steam Supplied Via Annulus)

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

DP15EF1C

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES EXXON ENGINEERING

DESIGN PRACTICES Section

Page

XV-E PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

25 of 60

Date December, 1999

FIGURE 1D SMOKELESS ELEVATED FLARE TIP (STEAM INSPIRATED AIR TYPE)

Circular Ring Flame at Low Gas Flow Rates

Incoloy 800

Pilots Between Spokes

Flare Gas Flows From Centerbody Into Spokes Venturi Shroud Steam Nozzle at Venturi Throat

304 SS

Steam Ring

Inspirated Primary Air Passes Between Spokes DP15EF1D

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J. 0.2

10"

0.3

0.5

0.6

0.8

1.0

18"

20"

2

24"

3

30"

4

5

36"

6

8

42"

10

(Source: J. Zink Co.)

48"

15

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

Qe – Equivalent Gas Flow Rate in m scf/hr. at Standard Conditions

0.4

16"

FLARES

DP15EF2A

Note: (1) This chart shows tip pressure drop as a function of diameter and equivalent flow rate.

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.3

Tip Diameter

W = Mass Flow Rate, Lb/Hr. T = Temperature, °R. M = Average Molecular Weight

Page

0.4

0.5

0.6

TM

Where Qe = Equivalent Gas Flow Rate Through Tip, SCF/Hr. Qg = Actual Gas Flow Rate, SCF/Hr.

Qe = 0.0081 Qg

XV-E 26 of 60 Date December, 1999

0.8

1.0

2

Determine Equivalent Flow Rate From Qe = 3.1 W T , or M

Section

Tip Pressure Drop, psi

3

DESIGN PRACTICES SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN EXXON ENGINEERING

FIGURE 2A (CUSTOMARY UNITS)(1) PRESSURE DROP IN JOHN ZINK FLARE TIPS

Tip Pressure Drop, kPa

5

6

103 2

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J. 5

40 0m m

4

45 0m m

6

50 0m m

8

104

75 0m m 900 mm

2

3

105 0m m

60 0m m

4

Qe – Equivalent Gas Flow Rate in dm3 / s at Standard Conditions

3

12 00 mm

5

6

8

105

Section XV-E

DP15EF2B

Note: (1) This chart shows tip pressure drop as a function of diameter and equivalent flow rate.

8

W = Mass Flow Rate, kg/s T = Temperature, K. M = Average Molecular Weight

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

0.5

TM

Where Qe = Equivalent Gas Flow Rate Through Tip, dm3/s Qg = Actual Gas Flow Rate, dm3/s

Qe = 0.0109 Qg

Determine Equivalent Flow Rate From T , or Qe = 260 W M

FLARES

0.6

1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

10.0 9.0 8.0 7.0

20.0

30.0

EXXON ENGINEERING

D Ti p i a me ter 25 0m m

40.0

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN DESIGN PRACTICES Page

Date 27 of 60

December, 1999

FIGURE 2B (METRIC UNITS)(1) PRESSURE DROP IN JOHN ZINK FLARE TIPS

DESIGN PRACTICES Section

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES

Page

XV-E 28 of 60 Date December, 1999

EXXON ENGINEERING

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

FIGURE 3 NOMINAL STEAM REQUIREMENT FOR TYPICAL PROPRIETARY FLARE TIPS (JOHN ZINK STF-S) 0.45

0.40

> 40% Unsaturated

Steam Consumption Lbs Steam/Lb Gas (kg Steam / kg Gas)

0.35 < 40% Unsaturated 0.30

0.25

0.20

0.15

(Source: J. Zink Co.) 0.10

0.05

0

20

40

60

80

100

Molecular Weight of Flare Gas 50 1000

2000

200 (MJ / Sm3)

150

100 3000

4000

5000

Approximate Heat Capacity of Flared Gas

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

(Btu / Scf) DP15EF3

DESIGN PRACTICES

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES EXXON ENGINEERING

Section

Page

XV-E PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

29 of 60

Date December, 1999

FIGURE 4 FLARE PERFORMANCE CHART FOR PROPANE

Flame Boilover in Wind

2.0

Steam Snuffs Out Flame

1.0

Smoky Flame

Low Be st -Fr Op equ era enc tin yN gR ois e eg im e

Jet Noise

Weight Ratio of Steam/Propane

3.0

0 0

100

300

200

400

500

Discharge Velocity of Mixture, ft / s

0

25

50

75

100

Discharge Velocity of Mixture, m / s

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

125

150 DP15EF4

DESIGN PRACTICES Section

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES

Page

XV-E 30 of 60 Date December, 1999

EXXON ENGINEERING

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

FIGURE 5 MULTIJET FLARE SEAL DRUM ARRANGEMENT FOR USE ON MULTIJET, GROUND, OR STAGED ELEVATED FLARE

PI PI

To 1st Stage Distribution Header and Burners (See Figure 6)

Slope Down

Flare Header HCV (Butterfly) Lock After Setting

PI Vent

2nd Stage Seal Drum

12" (300 mm) Vent

To 2nd Stage Distribution Header and Burners (See Figure 6)

Slope Down

Vent Overcapacity Line to Elevated Flre

1st Stage Seal Drum

30" (750 mm) 55" (1400 mm) To Disposal 20 GPM (1.25 dm3/s)

Seal

20 GPM (1.25 dm3/s) To Disposal

10' (3 m) Min.

Note 2 5 GPM (0.32 dm3/s)

To Sewer

Water Notes: 1. Locate drums as close as possible to windbreaker. 2. Design for 0.4 ft/sec (0.12 m/s) to allow vapor disengaging. 3. Also see Figures 9 and 12 for ancilliary features.

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

DP15EF5

Plan Note 8

Windbreaker slats to be sloped inward to avoid line-of-sight to burners. See detail "D" 8'-0" (2400 mm)

11'-0" See Detail "E" (3300 mm) 26'-4" I.D. (8000 mm)

8" & 10" (200 & 250 mm) ∅ 2nd stage distribution lines

4" (100 mm) ∅ 1st stage burner lines

4" (100 mm) ∅ 2nd stage burner lines

8" (200 mm) curb

Provides 4 access doors in windbreaker

17'-6" (5250 mm)

All burners are placed on 16" (400 mm) centers along burner lines. Burner lines are spaced at 6 1/2" (410 mm) center to center

8" (200 mm) ∅ 1st stage distribution header Line A

Detail "C" Flare Distributor

28'-4" (approx.) (8000 mm) 16"(400 mm)

54 Jets 204 Jets

8" & 10" (200 & 250 mm) ∅ 2nd stage distribution headers 4" (100 mm) ∅ 1st & 2nd stage burner lines

8" (200 mm) ∅ 1st stage split feed line 8" (200 mm) ∅ 1st stage distribution headers

Y

1st stage 2nd stage

12" (300 mm) ∅ 2nd stage split feed line

Inside periphery of stack Welded supports for 1st stage. Note 3

Detail "B" Burner Pipe Insulation Support

1" (25 mm)

2" (50 mm)

1/4" (6 mm) castable cover 1" required over all staples (25 mm) except 1/2" (12 mm) over top row on burner line. Note 4 1" (25 mm)

1/4" (6 mm) C.S.

8" to 10" (200 to 250 mm)

5 1/2" (140 mm)

1" (25 mm) ∅ Silicon Carbide Rod (flame holder)

Flame Eye Port Flame Eye Port (Note 6) (Note 6) Gas and Gas and Oil See Detail X Oil Pilots 1/2" Pilots 1/16" x 1/4" x 3/8" "A" (12 mm) (2 x 6 x 9 mm) Collar 2nd Stage Bottom of Stack U-Bolt 2nd Stage 3/4" x 3/4" x 2 1/4" Strap Skirt 1st Stage (18 x 18 x 55 mm) Yoke 1st Stage 2 1/4" (55 mm) 1" (25 mm) Note 8 1" (25 mm) 1/4" x 3/4" (6 x 18 mm) Welded 4" (100 mm) of B&W Bar Stock Wings support for Koaocrete-D or equal 3/4" (18 mm) Welds 1st stage 1/4" x 1" (6 x 25 mm) Collar reinforced Ground Distributor Lockwasher Bi-Metallic Seal Weld Only 1st stage Supports Use 25-20 Rod distributors extended 1/4" (18 mm) Nut Section Y-Y Note 3 1" (25 mm)∅ std. pipe fully across supports (7 3 Tack Weld Burner 5 " jet (304SS) m Pipe m ) CL Spaced 16" (450 mm) 1" (25 mm) ∅ std. ) 8" mm pipe type 304SS center to center along pipe 5 Transite slats in 2 t Insulation a 1" (25 mm) third (2 metal frame Sl coupling 3000 lb 2" Flare X Burner Detail "A" carbon steel (50 mm) Side Line 45 Flame Holder and Support at Sl Section X-X Note 7 Detail "D" DP15EF6a Wind Breaker Slat

Grade 12" Sealed catch (300 mm) 10" (250 mm) ∅ basins to be 50' (15000 mm) drain to oil trap that feeds into dirty min. from water sewer windbreaker Elevation

12'-0" (3600 mm)

5'-6" (1650 mm)

8'-0" (2400 mm)

Welded supports for 1st stage Note 3 Y

Center support beam with 3 support points Note 5 & 3

Stagger adjacent lining support staples by 45° along burner line length and overlap about 1" to 2" (25 mm to 50 mm)

Steel Shell Around Refractory 3-3" (75 mm) ∅ Peepholes drilled thru stack, axes converge at common point 7'-6" (5250 mm) from windbreaker and 5'-6" (1630 mm) above grade. Two sets of holes on opposite sides of the stack.

12" (300 mm) ∅ split feed to 2nd stage distribution lines

10" (250 mm) ∅ main 1st stage feed line

18" (450 mm) ∅ main 2nd stage feed line

4" (100 mm) Sch. 40 pipe burner line

1/2" (40 mm)

8" (200 mm) ∅ 1st stage distribution and split feed line

3/4" (20 mm)

See Detail "C"

50'-0" (1500mm)

EXXON ENGINEERING

FLARES

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

15" (375 mm) 21" (525 mm)

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN DESIGN PRACTICES

Section XV-E

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

Page

Date 31 of 60

December, 1999

FIGURE 6A DETAILS OF TYPICAL MULTIJET FLARE

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J. 110

12" (300 mm)

Refractory Liner

Muffle Block

Flame Eye Ports Note 6

Bottom of Stack Skirt 3" (75 mm) Ignitor Tube Must Be a Straight Run From Stack to Point of Ignition.

8" (200 mm)

2" (50 mm) 6" (150 mm) Install Studs With Random Orientation Do Not Align

12" Adjustable (300 mm) Ring

Stack Support -SG

3/4" (18 mm) ∅ Rod x 10", (250mm)

Front View

6" (150 mm)

Side View DP15EF6b

Adjustable 1/8" x 6" 1 3/4" (3 x 150 mm) Carbon Steel (40 mm) Ring. Has a 6" (150 mm) Total Draft Adjustment

3" (75 mm)

Detail "J" Stack Adjustment

12" Min. (300 mm)

1" (25 mm)

1" (25 mm)

Bottom Edge of Stack

Stack Wall

3" (75 mm) 2" (50 mm)

10. Contractor shall check burner line and distribution header layout to insure sufficient allowance has been made for line expansion.

9. Center support to be two narrow beams spaced to accommodate burner line expansion and as narrow as possible to preclude restriction of air flow to burners. Provide guides for 1st stage pipes which traverse full diameter.

8. Lower half of plan view shows one half of the 2nd stage feed and distribution lines. Lines to other half of 2nd stage (not shown) to be identical. All piping to each side of 2nd stage burners shall be symmetrical. Similarly upper half of plan view shows 1st stage split feed and distribution lines. 1st stage manifolding to be under 2nd stage installation (see SectionY-Y).

7. Flame holder support, to be fabricated of Type 304 S.S. materials.

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

Bottom Edge of Stack

Center of Span

Stack Wall Tack Weld Nut to Stud and to Angle

3" x 3" x 1/4" x 3" (75 x 75 x 6 x 75 mm)

10" 5" (250 mm) (125 mm) Detail "I" Lining Stud Location

10" (250 mm)

Detail "H" Stack Bottom

El. 10' (3000mm)

6. Provide self checking flame eyes of the ultraviolet type for each ground flare pilot. They shall be provided in accordance with the intent of IP 7-2-1 Paragraph 6.46 as modified to fit this installation. On flame-out they shall sound alarm in main control house.

5. 3 first stage burner lines to have 9 jets on each half section. Second stage burner lines to have 9-8-8-8-7-6-4 jets on each half section. Center-line burners each half section, to be spaced 16",(400mm) center line to center line.

4. Castable liner material to be equivalent to A. P. Green Co. Kast-OLite 30, applied per manufacturer's instructions.

3. The feed ends of the 1st stage headers are welded directly to the 2nd stage feed headers. The 1st stage balance line is supported on a cross tie welded on the under side of the two adjacent burner pipes of the 2nd stage. There are a total of 8 support points for the 2nd stage distributor.

2. Gas-oil pilots are located at origin of each 1st stage burner (line A). See detail"F". Provide strainers in fuel supply lines.

Notes: 1. All burner lines shall be level and in the same plane. The 1st and 2nd stage header lines shall be sloped such that the burners drain to their seal drums.

Stack Support L&G

1/2" (12 mm) ∅ Welding Stud or Equiv. Approx. 4" (100 mm) Long With a 5 1/2" (90 mm) Slot (Typical) Spacing Per Detail "I" Split Rod is Welded on Side of Stack Than Spread to "Y" Shade.

1" + 1/2" (25 + 12 mm) - 0 - 0 Castable Cover Over Studs Stud Shown in Spread Position

4" Carbon Steel Shell (100 mm) Stack 1/4" Base PL (6 mm) (Carbon Steel)

Detail "G" Stack Top

1/2" (12 mm)

45

Carbon Steel Shell 4" (100 mm)

Castable Lines Suitable for at Least 5000 °F (2760°C) Hot Face Temp. Note 4

FLARES

Detail "F" Oil and Gas Pilot Note 2

Muffle Block

Align Pilots So That Flame Directed Over Closest Jet of Line A on the 1st Stage Burner Distributor

Shell Castable Lining

C.S. Shell

10" (250 mm)

Bottom of Stack Skirt

See Detail "A & B"

1" (25 mm) Fishtail Burner (On-Off Pilot)

Detail "E" Flare Stack

26'-4" (8000 mm) I.D. (Inside Castable Liner)

6" (200 mm)

Flame Holder Line A of the 4" (100 mm) ∅ 1st Stage Burner Lines

Min

12 3/4" (320 mm)

Flame Eye Ports Note B

See Detail "F" For Pilot Drawings

Fireproof All Support Members and Arrange Legs to Avoid Burner Headers, Use Cable Guys if Required

See Detail "H" & "J"

See Detail "G"

5" (125 mm) 1/4" (6 mm)

3-3" (75 mm) Peep Holes Drilled Thru Stack As Shown

Page

11" (275 mm)

XV-E 32 of 60 Date December, 1999

7" (175 mm)

Section

3" (75 mm)

DESIGN PRACTICES SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN EXXON ENGINEERING

FIGURE 6B DETAILS OF TYPICAL MULTIJET FLARE (Cont)

DESIGN PRACTICES

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES EXXON ENGINEERING

Section

Page

XV-E PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

33 of 60

Date December, 1999

FIGURE 7 TYPICAL BURNING-PIT FLARE

Pilot and Igniter Lines (See Text)

Distributor and Concrete/Refractory Pad. Pad Width = 5 Times Distributor Diameter (2 ft (0.6 m) min) (See Detail A)

Liquid and Vapor Inlet

Water Outlet See Detail B

See Detail B R.O. Dike Wall ~30° Slope to Horizontal

Seal Water Make Up Supply 20 gpm (1.25 dm3/s)

18"(450 mm) Freeboard

Rows of 1-1/2" (38 mm) Dia. Holes on 3" (75 mm) Triangular Pitch Maximum Oil Level

12" (300 mm) Min. 4" (100 mm) Normal Water Level

Base distributor diameter on pressure drop along its length of 0.025 psi (0.17 kPa) at maximum flow. Base distributor length and number of holes on pressure drop of 0.25 psi (1.7 kPa) across the holes at maximum flow. Concrete

12" (300 mm) Bottom of Pit

1-1/2" (38 mm) Drain Holes

Detail A Liquid and Vapor Distributor

Min. Seal Water Supply

6" (150 mm)

Refractory

Min.

Seal depth sized to prevent oil discharge when dike full of liquid hydrocarbon

Overflow elevation at required normal liquid level

Normal Water Level (Below Grade) To Sewer

Detail B Seal Water Inlet and Overflow Seal

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

DP15EF7

PI

PC

Pilot Gas Pressure Control Station (at Grade)

PI

PLA

PHA

Sight Glass

FO(H)

Spark Igniter

Isolation Valves (at Grade)

To No. 3 Pilot

To No. 2 Pilot

Low Point Drain

To No. 2 Igniter

To No. 3 Igniter

Note 2

Pilot Gas/Air Venturi (Located at Flare Tip Platform)

Thermocouple

DP15EF8

FLARES

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

Notes: 1. Locate igniter assembly and individual pilot and igniter valves together (may be remote from flare if required). 2. Three way valves are required in the flame front generator lines downstream from the spark plug ignition to ensure there is always an open path from the flame front generator to a pilot.

Pilot Gas Strainers (at Grade)

PdI

PI

RO

RO

Page

Pilot Gas Supply

PI

Instrument Air Strainer (at Grade)

PI

Note 1 Igniter Assembly Located at Grade. Pilot Ignition Readily Visible From the Igniter.

Flare Tip

XV-E 34 of 60 Date December, 1999

Instrument Air Supply

Electrical Power Supply

Pilot Tip (One of Three)

Section

Transformer and Igniter Pushbutton

Igniter Tip and Windshield

DESIGN PRACTICES SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN EXXON ENGINEERING

FIGURE 8 TYPICAL ELEVATED FLARE PILOT AND IGNITER

DESIGN PRACTICES

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES EXXON ENGINEERING

Section

Page

XV-E

35 of 60

Date

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

December, 1999

FIGURE 9A (CUSTOMARY UNITS) TYPICAL FLARE SEAL DRUM Flare Stack Winterized (See Text) Clean Out Cover

Slope Down

Vapor from Drum Blowdown

Slope Down

Siphon Breaker Vent (Locate as for manhole vent per IP 3-2-1)

Min.

TLCI

Min.

Blanked Flush With Inlet

10' Min. For Cold Releases (Locate TLCI upstream to provide adequate response time).

Normal Water Flow Rate Pressure Drop

Detail "A" See Note (3) (Note 1) Baffle Skimmed Oil to Vacuum Truck TIC Steam

3" Drain to Sewer

Sparger

Min. For Winterizing

Max. Water Velocity = 0.4'/Sec in vertical downpipe

Steam

Sour Water (If Included)

Make-up Water via Strainer and R.O. 20 Gpm

R.O.

10' Min. or 175% of Max. Drum Operating Pressure (Note 2)

Min.

1" Drain

To Disposal 3" Drain

d

Normal Liquid Level

2"

2"

o

3 - 4"

60

2" d/4 Min.

o

60

Gunite Lining DETAIL A

6"

H2S Laden Water

4"

Make Up Water

6" To Disposal

DETAIL B BAFFLE ARRANGEMENT FOR FLARING H 2S

Notes: (1) See Figure 12 for Typical Non-Pulsing Sparger. (2) A 110% seal depth is permitted for remote contingencies. (3) Three connections, 6 in. apart for skimmed oil.

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

DP15EF9a

DESIGN PRACTICES Section

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES

Page

XV-E 36 of 60 Date December, 1999

EXXON ENGINEERING

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

FIGURE 9B (METRIC UNITS) TYPICAL FLARE SEAL DRUM Flare Stack Winterized (See Text)

1 Diam. or 300 mm Max. Clean Out Cover

Slope Down

Vapor from Drum Blowdown

Slope Down

Min.

TLCI

50 mm

Siphon Breaker Vent (Locate as for manhole vent per IP 3-2-1)

Min.

Blanked Flush With Inlet

3 m Min. For Cold Releases (Locate TLCI upstream to provide adequate response time).

Detail "A" (Note 1) Baffle

Normal Water Flow Rate Pressure Drop

See Note 3 Skimmed Oil to Vacuum Truck

TIC Steam 75 mm Drain Sparger to Sewer Min. For Winterizing

Max. Water Velocity = 0.12 m/s in vertical downpipe

Steam

Sour Water (If Included)

Make-up Water Via Strainer and R.O. 1.25 dm3/s

R.O.

Min.

25 mm Drain

To Disposal 75 mm Drain

d

Normal Liquid Level

75-100 mm

3 m Min. or 175% of Max. Drum Operating Pressure (Note 2)

50 mm 50 mm 60o 50 mm

d/4 Min.

o

60

Gunite Lining DETAIL A

6"

H2S Laden Water

100 mm

Make Up Water

6" To Disposal

DETAIL B BAFFLE ARRANGEMENT FOR FLARING H 2S

Notes: (1) See Figure 12 for Typical Non-Pulsing Sparger. (2) A 110% seal depth is permitted for remote contingencies. (3) Three connections, 15 cm apart for skimmed oil.

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

DP15EF9b

DESIGN PRACTICES

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES EXXON ENGINEERING

Section

Page

XV-E PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

December, 1999

FIGURE 10 MOLECULAR DRY SEAL (JOHN ZINK)

Flare Tip

Continuous Purge (Into Flare Stack or Header) Flare Stack Flare Gas Inlet

Drain to Grade

DP15EF10

37 of 60

Date

(Source: J. Zink Co.)

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

DESIGN PRACTICES Section

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES

Page

XV-E 38 of 60 Date December, 1999

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

FIGURE 11 FLUIDIC SEAL (NATIONAL AIROIL)

Entering Air

Velocity Gradient of Flared Gas

Baffles

Purge Gas Flow

DP15EF11

Flare Stack

(Source: National Air-Oil Company)

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

EXXON ENGINEERING

DESIGN PRACTICES

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES EXXON ENGINEERING

Section

Page

XV-E

39 of 60

Date

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

December, 1999

FIGURE 12 TYPICAL NON-PULSING SPARGER

Normal Liquid Level

Seal Depth

Slope 1/8" per ft (10 mm per m)

Closed End

D

D

Drill Holes in These Two Zones Only. See Detail "A"

L/2

D/2+6" (D/2 + 150 mm)

L D = Pipe Diameter L = Pipe Length

Minimum Recommended Distance to Overflow Detail "A" 1

2

3

4

5

6

Level Number W

Hole Diameter: 1/2 in. (13 mm)

Total Number of Levels =

Cut Slot Along Bottom of Pipe

Vertical Distance Between Levels: 1 in. (25 mm)

W=

3D +2 (L / D) – 1

π 4

D L/D

Hole Spacing Required on Each Level Level Number Hole Spacing (inches) Center-To-Center Holes/Level Per Foot of Pipe Hole Spacing (mm) Center to Center Holes/Level Per Metre of Pipe

1 3 4 75 13

2 3 8 75 26

3 2 12 50 40

4 2 12 50 40

Note: Minimum Recommended L / D = 7

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

5 or More 1.5 16 40 50 DP15EF12

DESIGN PRACTICES Section

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES

Page

XV-E 40 of 60 Date December, 1999

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

EXXON ENGINEERING

FIGURE 13 NH4HS DEPOSITION TEMPERATURES 105

4

NH4HS Dissociation Constant, Kp, (psia)2

10

In this area, deposition of solid NH4HS can occur.

103

102

NH3(g) = H2S(g) Kp = (PH2S)(PNH3)

Reference: U.S. Bureau of Mines Bulletin 406, p. 56 (1937)

10

1 50

NH4HS(s)

75

100

125

150

175

200

Temperature, °F

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

225 DP15EF13

DESIGN PRACTICES

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES EXXON ENGINEERING

Section

Page

XV-E

41 of 60

Date

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

December, 1999

FIGURE 14 NH4HCO3 DEPOSITION TEMPERATURES 103

In this area, deposition of solid NH4HCO3 can occur.

NH4HCO3 Dissociation Constant, Kp, (psia)3

102

10

1

NH3(g) + CO2(g) + H2O(g) Kp = (PNH3)(PCO2)(PH2O)

10–1

10–2

70

80

90

100

110

NH4HCO3(s)

120

130

Temperature, °F

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

140 DP15EF14

DESIGN PRACTICES Section

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES

Page

XV-E 42 of 60 Date December, 1999

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

EXXON ENGINEERING

APPENDIX A RADIATION AND SPACING FROM FLARES AND IGNITED VENTS The following procedures for determining flame shape, flame center, and radiant heat density at any adjacent location are applicable to flares and to vents (such as atmospheric pressure relief valve discharges), which may inadvertently become ignited. This material is abstracted from Report No. EE.15ER.71, Predicting Radiant Heating from Flares, to which reference should be made for further background information, if required.

COMPUTER CALCULATIONS A computer program (FLARAD, Program No. T-3576) is available for performing the radiant heat density calculations described in this Appendix. The input information required is: Atmospheric Conditions - Average wind speed at grade, ambient air temperature, air density, relative humidity, FLARAD automatically converts normal average wind speed [measured 33 ft (10 m) above grade] to wind speed at the flare tip elevation above grade. Flare Gas - Molecular weight, lower flammable limit, density at flare tip, fraction, F, of heat release radiated by the flame. Flare Parameters - Heat release rate, tip diameter, gas discharge velocity, stack height.

SIMPLIFIED CALCULATION OF FLAME SHAPE AND LENGTH A simplified graphical procedure has been developed for the determination of Xc (horizontal) and Zc (vertical), the flame midpoint coordinates for flares and ignited vents. A more detailed procedure for calculating the flame center is described in the next section. The attached graphs, shown in Figures A-1A and A-2A, one for Xc and one for Zc, are based on two independent variables: CL and a modified form of djR. The latter variable has been modified to include gas and air temperatures and molecular weights instead of densities. The ideal gas law assumed. The graph curves have been smoothed over the CL range of 0.5 to 1.5 to remove discontinuities and curve fit inaccuracies existing in the design practice procedure. No significant difference is introduced with the data smoothing. Information Required CL dj Mj

= = =

Lower flammable limit concentration of flare gas in air, volume fraction (see Page 45). Inside diameter of flare tip, ft (m) Molecular weight of flare gas

M∞ Tj

= =

Molecular weight of air = 28.97 Temperature of flare gas, °R (°K)

T∞ U

= =

Uj

=

Temperature of air, °R (°K) Normal average wind speed at 33 ft (10 m) elevation above grade, ft/s (m/s), based on local meteorological data Flare gas velocity at the flare tip, ft/s (m/s)

ρj

=

Flare gas density at the flare tip (before ignition), lb/ft3 (kg/m3)

ρ∞ h

= =

Ambient air density, lb/ft3. If it is not known, use .0706 lb/ft3 (1.22 kg/m3) Height of flare tip above grade, ft (m)

Calculation Procedure Step 1 Calculate the average wind speed, U∞, at the flare tip elevation above grade and the concentration parameter CL for the flare gas:  h  U∞ ( ft / s) = U    33  CL = CL

Uj

0.14

 h  ; U∞ (m / s) = U    10 

0.14

Mj

U∞ M∞

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

DESIGN PRACTICES

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES EXXON ENGINEERING

Section

Page

XV-E PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

43 of 60

Date December, 1999

APPENDIX A (Cont) RADIATION AND SPACING FROM FLARES AND IGNITED VENTS Step 2 Calculate the graphical parameter d j

Uj  T∞ M j    U∞  Tj 

0.5

, then enter Figure A1A and determine Zc.

Step 3 Enter Figure A-2A and determine Xc. This locates the flame center, which is treated as the source of all radiation from the flame.

DETAILED CALCULATION OF FLAME SHAPE AND LENGTH Step 1 Calculate the average wind speed, U∞, at the flare tip elevation above grade and the concentration parameter CL for the flare gas:  h  U∞ ( ft / s) = U    33  CL = CL

Uj

0.14

 h  ; U∞ (m / s) = U    10 

0.14

Mj

Eq. (A-1)

U∞ M∞

Step 2 Calculate the value of SL from Eq. (A-2a) or (A-2c). This term is a dimensionless coordinate of the concentration CL along the centerline of the flame. From SL , calculate the downwind coordinate XL from Eq. (A-2b) or obtain it from Figure A-A3. 1.

If CL ≤ 0.6, SL =

2.04

(CL )

Eq. (A-2a)

1.03

and XL = SL − 1.65

Eq. (A-2b)

(See Figure A-A3). 2.

If CL > 0.6, SL =

a.

2.51

(CL )

Eq. (A-2c)

0.625

If SL > 2.35, X L = SL − 1.65

b.

Eq. (A-2b)

If SL ≤ 2.35, obtain XL from Figure A-A3. This figure is a plot of the equation: 2

SL = 1.04 XL + 2.05 XL

0.28

Eq. (A-2d)

The term XL is used later [Eq. (A-5b)] to locate the tip of the flame. Step 3 Calculate the dimensionless rise ZL of the flame tip above the flare tip: ZL = 2.05 XL

0.28

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

Eq. (A-3)

DESIGN PRACTICES Section

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES

Page

XV-E 44 of 60 Date December, 1999

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

EXXON ENGINEERING

APPENDIX A (Cont) RADIATION AND SPACING FROM FLARES AND IGNITED VENTS Step 4 Calculate the scaling parameter R, which accounts for the effect of flame shape of the relative thrusts of the wind and the gas jet discharging from the flare tip: R =

Uj  ρ j  U∞  ρ∞

   

0.5

Eq. (A-4)

Step 5 Calculate the full-scale coordinates of the flame tip: ZL = Z L d j R

Eq. (A-5a)

XL = X L d j R

Eq. (A-5b)

where: ZL

=

Vertical distance of flame tip above flare tip, ft (m)

XL

=

Horizontal distance of flame tip from flare tip, ft (m)

Step 6 Calculate the location of the flame center, which is treated as the source of all radiation from the flame. Only flames bent over by the wind are considered, since for nearly vertical flames (calm air), the effective center of flame radiation is higher off the ground and therefore not limiting for spacing purposes. ZC = 0.82 ZL

Eq. (A-6a)

XC = 0.5 XL

Eq. (A-6b)

CALCULATION OF LOWER FLAMMABLE LIMIT CL Flammable limits for pure components may be obtained from Table B-1 in Appendix B. Note that values for lower flammable limit in the table are expressed as percentage, while CL is a volume fraction. For calculating CL of a mixture of gases, the following equation is recommended:  Y Y Y Y  CL =  1 + 2 + 3 + . . . + n   CL CL 2 CL 3 CLn   1

−1

Eq. (A-7)

where: CL

=

Lower flammable limit concentration of the mixture in air, volume fraction.

Y1

=

Mole fraction (or volume fraction) of Component 1 in the mixture

Yn

=

Mole fraction of the nth component

CL1 =

Lower flammable limit concentration of Component 1 in air, volume fraction

CLn =

Lower flammable limit of the nth component, volume fraction

Eq. (A-7) is accurate for mixtures of paraffinic gases or for mixtures of H2, CO and CH4. It is only approximate for mixtures of H2 and C2H4, H2 and C2H2, H2S and CH4 or CH4 and C2H2Cl2. It is even less accurate for mixtures of flammable gases with steam or inerts. Nevertheless, for the accuracy required here, this simple equation should be tried first in all cases. When the flare gas is a mixture of flammable gases and inerts, the simplest way to approximate CL is to use the above equation with CL = ∞ for the inert components. This step treats the inerts as a simple diluent in an ideal mixture. It would give only a rough approximation for mixtures such as H2 and H2O vapor, where a component, which is inert in the cold mixture, nevertheless enters into the reactions taking place in the flame. In such cases, if a rough approximation of CL is not good enough, then more accurate methods described in Appendix B should be used.

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES EXXON ENGINEERING

DESIGN PRACTICES Section

Page

XV-E PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

45 of 60

Date December, 1999

APPENDIX A (Cont) RADIATION AND SPACING FROM FLARES AND IGNITED VENTS IGNITED PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE RELEASES Application of the above procedure to inadvertently ignited pressure relief valve discharges can involve a special problem. Certain combinations of pressure ratio and length of pressure relief valve riser can result in choked flow, with a pressure discontinuity at the exit. The pressure of the jet then adjusts to atmospheric pressure in a system of shock waves or expansion waves over a distance of a few pipe diameters. These waves can affect the local mixing of the jet with the cross-wind. Since the calculation procedure incorporates correlations for subsonic jets, it cannot be expected to be entirely accurate in this case. Nevertheless, since the wave system occupies a very small portion of the flow field influenced by the jet, the procedure can still be counted on to provide a useful approximation of the gross flame length and flame shape when the actual discharge velocity and diameter are used in the calculation. Credit for additional height of the flame center for multiple valve installations may be taken by clustering the pressure relief valve discharge pipes to the atmosphere. The following procedure should be used for determining equivalent diameter and exit velocity to be used in the flame center calculation. Diameter and velocity are based on the total actual area of the clustered vents. Equal Diameter Vents D j equiv . =

4 (sum of vent areas) = π

d2 n

v j equiv . = actual velocity of any one vent Unequal Diameter Vents D j equiv . = U j equiv . =

4 (sum of vent areas) = π

d12 + d22 + . . . dn2

Total Gas Rate 1.273 G = Total Vent Area (D j equiv . ) 2

Definition of Terms d, d1, d2, dn Dj equiv.

= =

Diameter of individual vents, ft (m) Equivalent vent diameter to be used in flame calculation, ft (m)

N = Number of vents in cluster (n ≥ 3) G = Total gas rate of all vents, in ft3 (m3/s) at one atm and release temperature = Equivalent vent exit velocity to be used in flame calculation, ft/s (m/s) Uj equiv. For further background, see Report EE.15ER.71, Predicting Radiant Heating from Flares.

CALCULATION OF RADIANT HEAT FLUX K The following calculation procedure is used to predict the heat flux K incident on a surface normal to the direction of radiation, at any distance from the flare stack and any elevation above grade. Information Required Xc Zc h F • m H r

= = = =

Downwind distance from flare stack to flame center, ft (m) Height of flame center above flare tip, ft (m) Height of flare tip above grade, ft (m) Fraction of heat release radiated from the flame

= = =

Mass flaring rate, lb/hr (kg/s) Lower heating value of the flare gas, Btu/lb (kJ/kg) Relative humidity, percent EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

DESIGN PRACTICES Section

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES

Page

XV-E 46 of 60 Date December, 1999

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

EXXON ENGINEERING

APPENDIX A (Cont) RADIATION AND SPACING FROM FLARES AND IGNITED VENTS Calculation Procedure Step 1 Calculate the rate of heat released Q, Btu/hr (kW) •

Q = mH

Eq. (A-8)

For pure components, the value of H may be obtained from the Exxon Blue Book. In general, H ≅ 20,000 Btu/lb (46,600 kJ/kg) for most paraffins, olefins, and diolefins H ≅ 18,000 Btu/lb (41,900 kJ/kg) for aromatics, and H ≅ 51,600 Btu/lb (120,000 kJ/kg) for hydrogen Step 2 Select the appropriate flame emissivity factor F, based on flare gas composition, by weight. Note that for ignited pressure relief valve releases, lower values of F are used, as described later in this section. FLARE GAS COMPONENT

F

Hydrogen, methane

0.2

C2 Hydrocarbons

0.25

C3 and C4 Hydrocarbons

0.3

C5 and heavier

0.4

Step 3 Calculate the distance from the center of the flame to a position with coordinates X and Z, representing personnel or equipment exposed to radiation from the flame. (Since the limiting case is the one in which the flame is blown over in the direction of the exposed personnel or equipment, they are in the same plane, and a two-coordinate system is adequate for describing their relative locations.) Note also that all wind directions must be considered, even in locations, which have a prevailing wind direction. D =

( X − Xc )2 + ( Z − Zc − h)2

where: D

=

Distance from the flame center to point (X, Z), ft (m)

Xc

=

X coordinate of the flame center, ft (m)

H + Zc

=

Z coordinate of the flame center, ft (m)

Eq. (A-9)

Step 4 Calculate the atmospheric transmissivity, τ: 1 / 16

 100  τ = 0.79    r 

1 / 16

 100     D 

Eq. (A-10)

Note: τ is dimensionless. D (ft) and r are as defined above.

or 1 / 16

 100  τ = 0.79    r 

1 / 16

 30.5     D 

Eq. (A-10)

Note: τ is dimensionless. D (m) and r are as defined above. Step 5 Calculate K from Eq. (A-11). K is incident on a surface normal to a line from point (X, Z) to the flame center (Xc, Zc). This is the maximum value of K at that location and is the value used when personnel exposure is being considered. K ( x,z ) =

τF Q

Eq. (A-11)

4 π D2

where: K

=

Heat radiated to the surface, Btu/hr/ft2 (kW/m2)

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

DESIGN PRACTICES

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES EXXON ENGINEERING

Section

Page

XV-E PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

47 of 60

Date December, 1999

APPENDIX A (Cont) RADIATION AND SPACING FROM FLARES AND IGNITED VENTS S

PERSONNEL EXPOSURE LIMITS TO HEAT RADIATION Heat Radiation From Flares In most cases, heat radiation is the controlling factor in determining the spacing of elevated or burning-pit flares, considering personnel exposures at grade under maximum heat release conditions. Maximum permissible flare radiation levels for personnel exposure are: MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE K, Btu/hr/ft2 (kW/m2)

CONDITIONS

3000 (9.45)

•

Maximum value of K at design flare release at any location where personnel have access, e.g., at grade below the flare, or on a platform or nearby equipment. Exposure must be limited to a few (approx. six) seconds, sufficient for escape only. On towers or other elevated structures, ladders must be provided on the side away from the flare, so that the tower or structure can provide some degree of shielding.

2000 (6.3)

•

Areas where emergency actions lasting up to 1 minute may be required by personnel without shielding.

1500 (4.75)

•

Areas where emergency actions lasting several minutes may be required by personnel without shielding, e.g., at the battery limits of a process unit.

500 (1.6)

•

Maximum value of K at design flare release for continuous exposure of personnel and maximum value of K at property line. [By comparison, solar radiation in a hot climate may be as high as 300 Btu/hr/ft2 (1 kW/m2).]

Heat Radiation From Ignition of Pressure Relief Valve Releases and Start-up Vents The following personnel exposure limits should be used to protect personnel against exposure to high radiant heat resulting from inadvertent ignition of atmospheric vents such as pressure relief valve releases and start-up vents: TYPE VENT •

•

Pressure Relief Valve Release to Atmosphere

Start-up Vent to Atmosphere

PERSONNEL EXPOSURE LIMIT 6,000 Btu/hr ft2 (18.9 kW/m2) maximum at grade or at frequently used operating platforms. Refer to Section XV-C for additional design criteria. Because of the higher exit velocities and additional air entrainment associated with PR valve discharges, the heat release is less than for a low velocity flare. The following factors (fraction of heat release radiated) should be used: F for PR Valve Discharges Hydrogen, Methane

0.1

C2 and Heavier Hydrocarbons

0.25

3,000 Btu/hr ft2 (9.45 kW/m2) maximum at grade or at frequently-used operating platforms. Note that the higher F factors in this section for flares should be used for start-up vents.

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

DESIGN PRACTICES Section

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES

Page

XV-E 48 of 60 Date December, 1999

EXXON ENGINEERING

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

APPENDIX A (Cont) RADIATION AND SPACING FROM FLARES AND IGNITED VENTS EQUIPMENT EXPOSURE TO HEAT RADIATION In most cases, equipment can safely tolerate higher degrees of heat density than those defined for personnel. However, if anything vulnerable to overheating problems is involved, such as low melting point construction materials (e.g., aluminum or plastic), heat-sensitive streams, flammable vapor spaces, or electrical equipment, then the effect of radiant heat on them may need to be evaluated. When this evaluation is required, the necessary heat balance is performed to determine the resulting surface temperature, for comparison with acceptable temperatures for the equipment, e.g., up to 176°F (80°C) is permitted for electronic instrument transmitters. For tanks, this heat balance reduces to the following equation:  T  K (Btu / hr − ft 2 ) = 0.1713  s   100 

4

+

0.21 (Ts − T∞ )4 / 3 Es

Eq. (A-12)

or  T  K (kW / m2 ) = 0.0057  s   100  where: K Ts

4

+

0.0015 (Ts − T∞ )4 / 3 Es

=

Radiant heat flux at the tank surface, Btu/hr ft2 (kW/m2)

=

Tank surface hot-spot temperature, °R (°K)

T∞ =

Ambient air temperature, °R (°K)

Es

Tank surface emissivity

=

Eq. (A-12)

Copper, oxidized black

:

0.8

Copper, dull

:

0.15

Copper, polished

:

0.1

Stainless steel, after repeated heating and cooling

:

0.5-0.7

Stainless steel, polished

:

0.1-0.2

Aluminum, heavily oxidized

:

0.2-0.3

Aluminum paint

:

0.27-0.67

White paint

:

0.77-0.95

The above equation is based on no wind, negligible unsteady state heating of the tank shell since it is thin, and negligible transient conduction of heat into the tank contents because large bodies of liquid hydrocarbons act like thermal insulators for short exposures to radiation. Refer to Report No. EE.15ER.71 for calculation procedures for other surface types and for tanks where wind cooling is taken into account.

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

DESIGN PRACTICES

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES EXXON ENGINEERING

Section

Page

XV-E

49 of 60

Date

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

December, 1999

FIGURE A-1A (CUSTOMARY UNITS) FLAME CENTER FOR FLARES AND IGNITED VENTS Zc- VERTICAL DISTANCE, ft

10 10.0

20

0.5

50

)

100

T Mj ∞ Tj

Mj

29.0 U∞

0.1 0.05

Zc, Vertical Distance From Flare Tip To Flame Center, ft

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

0.01

10

20

50

100

200

500

10

15

20

0.05

30

0.1

40

50

CL

Uj

1.0

70

0.5

0.5

1.0

10 0

15 0

20 0

30 0

50 0 40 0

70 0

10 00

5.0

20 00 15 00

30 00

40 00

j

200

( UU∞ ) (

0.01 1000

dj

DP15EFA1a

DESIGN PRACTICES Section

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES

Page

XV-E 50 of 60 Date December, 1999

EXXON ENGINEERING

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

FIGURE A-1A (METRIC UNITS) FLAME CENTER FOR FLARES AND IGNITED VENTS Zc- VERTICAL DISTANCE, m

( U∞ ) ( TaTM ) Uj

0.5

j

5

10

50

5.0 1.0

Zc, Vertical Distance From Flare Tip To Flame Center, m

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

Mj

29.0

Uj 0.1 0.01

5

10

50

100

3.0

0.05

0.05

5.0

0.1

7.5

CL

U ∞

0.5 10

12

15

0.5

20

30

50

1.0

75

12 0 10 0

15 0

20 0

30 0

50 0

75 0

10 00

5.0

12 00

10.0

10

180

100

j

0.01 180

dj

DP15EFA1b

DESIGN PRACTICES

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES EXXON ENGINEERING

Section

Page

XV-E

51 of 60

Date

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

December, 1999

10

20

50

100

200

500

5.0

5.0

10.0

10.0

1000

FIGURE A-2A (CUSTOMARY UNITS) FLAME CENTER FOR FLARES AND IGNITED VENTS Xc- HORIZONTAL DISTANCE, ft

0.5

00 40 00 30 00 20 0 0 15 0 0 10 0 70 0 50 0 40 0 30

CL

50 40 30

0.1

20

0.1

Mj

70

29.0

0 20 0 15 0 10

Uj

0.5

1.0

(

1.0

dj

)(

U∞

0.5

Uj

)

Tj

U∞

T∞

Mj

15 10

0.05

0.05

7 5 4 3 2 1.5

10 0.01

20

50

100

200

500

0.01 1000

1

Xc, Horizontal Distance From Stack To Flame Center, ft

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

DP15EFA2a

DESIGN PRACTICES

FLARES

Page

XV-E 52 of 60 Date December, 1999

EXXON ENGINEERING

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

5

10

50

100

5.0

5.0

10.0

10

180

FIGURE A-2B (METRIC UNITS) FLAME CENTER FOR FLARES AND IGNITED VENTS Xc- HORIZONTAL DISTANCE, m

0.5

T∞

( ) U

Mj

Uj

∞

00 12 00 10 0 75 0 50

Uj

50

CL

30 15 7. 5

Xc, Horizontal Distance From Stack To Flame Center, m

0.1 0.01

5

10

100

0.01 180

0. 3

0. 5

.7 5

0.05

1 1.5 1 .2

0.05

2

3

0.1

5

12

10

10

Mj 29.0

0.5

0.5

0 30 0 20 0 15 0 12 0 10 75

U∞

(

)

1.0

1.0

dj

Tj

50

Section

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

DP15EFA2b

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

DESIGN PRACTICES

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES EXXON ENGINEERING

Section

Page

XV-E PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

53 of 60

Date December, 1999

FIGURE A-3 DIMENSIONLESS FLAME COORDINATES 1.0 0.8 0.6

0.4

0.2

SL = 1.04 XL 2 + 2.05 XL 0.28 0.1 0.08 0.06

XL

0.04

0.02

0.01 0.008 0.006

0.004

0.002

0.001

0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

SL

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

3.0 DP15EFA3

DESIGN PRACTICES Section

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES

Page

XV-E 54 of 60 Date December, 1999

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

EXXON ENGINEERING

APPENDIX B LIMITS OF FLAMMABILITY OF GAS MIXTURES When small increments of a combustible gas are successively mixed with air, a concentration is finally attained in which a flame will propagate if a source of ignition is present. This is referred to as the Lower Flammable Limit of the gas in air. As further increments of the gas are added, a higher concentration of flammable gas in air will finally be attained in which a flame will fail to propagate. The concentration of gas and air just as this point is reached is referred to as the Upper Flammable Limit of the gas in air. Safety requires that only the most reliable experimentally determined flammable limit data be considered in purging calculations. This is included in Table B-1.

PRESSURE AND TEMPERATURE EFFECTS ON FLAMMABILITY LIMITS Increased Pressure Will Widen Flammability Limits

➧

Below atmospheric pressure there is no effect on the limits of flammability of natural gas-air mixtures and most other gas-air mixtures. Below about 1 in. (25 mm) absolute pressure, carbon monoxide-air mixtures are not flammable. From atmospheric pressure, up to 300 psig (2170 kPa), the lower limit of flammability is not affected, but the upper limit rises as the pressure on the mixture is increased. This widens the limits of flammability as the pressure increases, as shown below. Above 300 psig (2170 kPa), the lower limit will be reduced, and the upper will approach an asymptotic limit. The multipliers given below cannot be prorated to higher pressures. Consult your Safety & Risk Regional contact for estimates at higher pressure. EFFECT OF INCREASE IN PRESSURE ON RAISING THE UPPER FLAMMABILITY LIMIT (U.F.L.) psig

0

100

200

300

350

Methane and Natural Gas U.F.L.

Approx.

15

18

24

32

40

Coke Oven Gas U.F.L.

Approx.

30.7

38.4

54

74.9

95.7

1

1.3

1.9

2.7

3.5

Multipliers* Note:

➧

* For estimating the upper flammability limit of other gases where the U.F.L. and L.F.L. are known at 0 psig, apply the multipliers indicated in the table to the difference between the limits. Add this product to the lower limit to find the new upper limit.

Increased Temperature Will Also Widen the Flammability Limits Raising the temperature also lowers the lower flammable limit, L.F.L. and raises the upper flammable limit, U.F.L. The following equations can be used to estimate the flammable limits at an elevated temperature, t°C: L.F.L. at t oF o

L.F.L. at 77 F U.F.L. at toF U.F.L. at 77o F

= 1 − 0.000401 ( t − 77 );

= 1 + 0.000401 ( t − 77 );

L.F.L. at toC L.F.L. at 25o C U.F.L. at toC U.F.L. at 25o C

= 1 − 0.000721 ( t − 25 )

= 1 + 0.000721 ( t − 25 )

CALCULATION OF FLAMMABILITY LIMITS The calculation of the flammability limits of complex gas mixtures is carried out by the application of the mixture rule first applied in such estimations by Le Chatelier in 1981. Stated simply, the mixture rule is that if two limit mixtures of different gases are added together, the resulting mixture also will be a limit mixture. The equation expressing this law is written as follows: CL =

1  Y1 Y2 Y Y  + + 3 + n  ∑  CL 2 CL 3 CLn   CL1

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

DESIGN PRACTICES

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES EXXON ENGINEERING

Section

Page

XV-E

55 of 60

Date

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

December, 1999

APPENDIX B (Cont) Where Y1, Y2, Y3, etc. are the volume fractions of each combustible gas present in the original mixture, free from air and inerts so that Y1 + Y2 + Y3 + … + Yn = 1. CL1, CL2, CL3, etc. are the lower limits of flammability of the components in air expressed as volume fractions. CL is the lower limit of flammability of the mixture. A similar procedure would be used for determining the upper limit of flammability. An example of the application of this law is indicated by a natural gas of the following composition.

GAS

VOLUME FRACTION GAS IN AIR LOWER LIMIT

VOLUME FRACTION

Methane

0.80

0.05

Ethane

0.15

0.031

Propane

0.04

0.021

Butane

0.01 Lower Limit =

0.0186 1

0.80 0.05

+

0.15 0.031

+

0.04 0.021

+

0.01

= 0.043 Gas in Air

0.0186

Any oxygen contained in a mixture may be considered as though it were a part of the air required for combustion, and the analysis of the flammable mixture should be converted to an air-free basis before the flammable limits are calculated. When mixtures contain appreciable quantities of the inert substances, such as nitrogen and carbon dioxide, calculation of the flammability limits becomes somewhat more complicated and requires the use of an extension of the mixture rule. In this modification, the inert gases are taken into consideration by assuming that the original mixture is composed of a number of submixtures of inert gas-combustible gas, the flammability limits of which have been experimentally determined in a similar manner as have the limits for the pure gases, as given in Table B-1. Figures B-1, B-2, and B-3 show the flammability limits of mixtures of some of the more common gases present in fuels with CO2, N2, and H2O. As an example of the application of this extension of the mixture rule, take a producer gas of the composition shown in Table B-2. The CO2 and N2 may be apportioned with the different combustibles in any of several ways, two of which are represented by Calculations A and B in Table B-2. In these examples, the inerts CO2 and N2 are combined with the combustible H2 and CO, and the small amount of CH4 is taken alone. Next, the ratio of inert to combustible is obtained for each group as shown, and the flammable limits for each such mixture are obtained from Figure B-1. The mixture rule formula is now applied, using the data as just obtained, and the limits are calculated as shown in Table B-2. The summary at the bottom of Table B-2 indicates the relative agreement between the calculated data and that experimentally determined for this particular producer gas. It was suggested that the difference between calculated and determined data in this case may have been due more to inaccuracies in the analysis of the producer gas (particularly for methane) than to the fault of the mixture rule formula. This points up the fact that reliable gas analyses are also a necessary part of the calculated flammability limit data.

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

DESIGN PRACTICES Section

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES

Page

XV-E 56 of 60 Date December, 1999

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

TABLE B-1 LIMITS OF FLAMMABILITY OF GASES AND VAPORS, PERCENT IN AIR

GAS OR VAPOR

LOWER

UPPER

4.00 12.50 15.00 4.00 1.25

75.00 74.00 28.00 44.00 50.00

Methane Ethane Propane Butane Iso-butane Pentane Iso-pentane Hexane Heptane Octane Nonane Decane Dodecane Tetradecane

5.00 3.00 2.10 1.90 1.80 1.50 1.40 1.10 1.05 1.00 0.83 0.80 0.60 0.50

15.00 12.50 9.50 8.50 8.40 7.80 7.60 7.50 6.70 6.50 2.90 5.40  

Ethylene Propylene Butadiene Butylene (1-Butene) Amylene (1-Pentene)

2.70 2.00 2.00 1.60 1.50

36.00 11.10 12.00 10.00 8.70

Acetylene Allylene (Propadiene) Benzene Toluene Styrene o-Xylene Naphthalene Anthracene

2.50 1.74 1.20 1.10 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.63

100.00  7.80 7.10 6.80 6.70 5.90 

Cyclo-propane Cyclo-hexene Cyclo-hexane Methyl cyclo-hexane

2.40 1.22 1.30 1.20

10.40 4.81 8.00 6.70

Gasoline-regular Gasoline-73 octane Gasoline-92 octane Gasoline-100 octane Naphtha

1.40 1.50 1.50 1.45 1.10

7.50 7.40 7.60 7.50 6.00

Jet fuel JP-4 Kerosene Gas oil

1.80 0.70 0.50

8.00 5.00 5.00

Hydrogen Carbon monoxide Ammonia Hydrogen sulfide Carbon disulfide

Note: Data taken from NFPA 325M, 1991 edition.

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

EXXON ENGINEERING

DESIGN PRACTICES

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES EXXON ENGINEERING

Section

Page

XV-E

57 of 60

Date

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

December, 1999

TABLE B-2 THE CALCULATION OF FLAMMABLE LIMITS GAS ANALYSIS GAS COMPOSITION

COMBINATIONS CHOSEN

TOTAL

RATIO INERT/COMBUSTIBLE

FLAMMABLE LIMITS (FIG. B-1) LOWER UPPER

H2

12.4%

12.4 H2 + 6.2 CO2

18.6%

0.50

CO

27.3

27.3 CO + 53.4 N2

80.7

1.96

39.8

73.0

CH4

0.7

0.7 CH4

0.7

0.00

5.0

15.0

CO2

6.2

O2

0.0

N2

53.4

Lower Limit

=

Upper Limit

=

6.0%

71.5%

100 = 19.0% 18.6 80.7 0 .7 + + 6 .0 39.8 5 .0

CALCULATION A

Gas Analysis

➧

100 = 70.8% 18.6 80.7 0 .7 + + 71.5 73.0 15.0

12.4 H2 + 53.4 N2

65.8%

4.31

22.0%

76.0%

27.3 CO + 6.2 CO2

33.5

0.23

15.0

71.0

0.7 CH4

0.7

0.7

5.0

15.0

Lower Limit

=

Upper Limit

=

100 = 18.7% 65.8 33.5 0 .7 + + 22.0 15.0 5 .0

CALCULATION B 100 = 72.2% 65.8 33.5 0 .7 + + 76.0 71.0 15.0

Lower Limit ➧

Summary

Determined Calculation A Calculation B

20.7 19.0 18.7

Upper Limit

Use 18.7%

73.7 70.8 72.2

Use 73.7%

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

DESIGN PRACTICES Section

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES

Page

XV-E 58 of 60 Date December, 1999

EXXON ENGINEERING

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

FIGURE B-1 FLAMMABLE LIMITS FOR HYDROGEN, CARBON MONOXIDE, METHANE, WITH NITROGEN, CARBON DIOXIDE AND WATER VAPOR

20

18 Flammable Limits For Hydrogen Carbon Monoxide Methane With Nitrogen, Carbon Dioxide and Water Vapor

+ H2

14

N2

12

H

2

10 +

CO

2

H2 + H O 2

8

6

CH 4

+N

N

2

2

CO + H

4

O + H2

4 CH

CO +

+ 4 CH

2O

2

70

60

50

40

2

2 CO

CO + C O

80

Volume of Inert (N2, CO2 or H2O) Per Volume of Combustible

16

30

20

10

0

Flammable Limit %

[ (Volume of Gas + Volume Inert) Per (Volume of Gas + Volume Inert + Volume Air) ] x 100

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

DP15EFB1

DESIGN PRACTICES

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

FLARES EXXON ENGINEERING

Section

Page

XV-E PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

➧

59 of 60

Date December, 1999

FIGURE B-2 FLAMMABLE LIMITS FOR PARAFFIN HYDROCARBONS WITH NITROGEN AND CARBON DIOXIDE

20

Flammable Limits For Paraffin Hydrocarbons With Nitrogen and Carbon Dioxide

18

C4 C3

14

H8 + N2

12

C2 +N H6 2

10

C4 O2 +C H 10

+ H8 C3

8

2 CO

6

Volume of Inert (N2, or CO2) Per Volume of Combustible

+N2 H 10

16

+ H6 C2 2 CO

4 CH

+N

4

2

2 + H4 C O2 C

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

Flammable Limit %

[ (Volume of Gas + Volume Inert) Per (Volume of Gas + Volume Inert + Volume Air) ] x 100

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

DP15EFB2

DESIGN PRACTICES

FLARES

Page

XV-E 60 of 60 Date December, 1999

EXXON ENGINEERING

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION - For Authorized Company Use Only

FIGURE B-3 FLAMMABLE LIMITS FOR METHANE, ETHYLENE, BENZENE WITH CARBON DIOXIDE, NITROGEN AND WATER VAPOR

C6

Flammable Limits For Methane Ethylene Benzene With Carbon Dioxide, Nitrogen, and Water Vapor

20

+N2 H8

18

C6

16

H6 O + H2

14

C6

12

H6 O2 +C

10

8

C2

+N

6

2

4

+N H4

CH

Volume of Inert (N2, CO2 or H2O) Per Volume of Combustible

Section

SAFETY IN PLANT DESIGN

2

+H

2 CO

4

+ H4 C2

CH

2O

CH

4

4

+C O

2

70

60

[

50

40

30

2

20

10

Flammable Limit % (Volume of Gas + Volume Inert) Per (Volume of Gas + Volume Inert + Volume Air) ] x 100

EXXON RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING COMPANY - FLORHAM PARK, N.J.

0 DP15EFB3