Data Analysis and Interpretation
Short Description
Download Data Analysis and Interpretation...
Description
c c To understand and study the theoretical prescription in HRM practices !
"# $ #!% &# ' ' % &
(# % & PART 1 )Ê c*+% & ÷Ê c )Ê % ,% & ÷Ê ' ! % & )Ê %*& * +& -&#' ! )Ê .% %*& * +& -&/ ÷Ê ) ! % & )Ê * ,%*& * +& -& ÷Ê ' % & )Ê % & )Ê % & +0 )Ê , +,% & )Ê 1+0,% & )Ê c,, + .% & c & -& )Ê +% - c % & -& , %*& * + - 2
PART 2 )Ê %*& * + -3% 4 ÷Ê & ' ÷Ê % ÷Ê % 5 '' ÷Ê , % ÷Ê ' % '' ÷Ê % ' )Ê 1 5c- ÷Ê & '5 ÷Ê 6$ ÷Ê 1$ % ! ÷Ê 1$ ÷Ê 1$ )Ê + *& ÷Ê & '5 ÷Ê ÷Ê & '7 6$ ÷Ê c! ' )Ê +8 ' 56$ ÷Ê ÷Ê ÷Ê ÷Ê ! )Ê c +& ÷Ê
÷Ê *' ÷Ê )Ê - cc0 && ÷Ê '9
÷Ê ' ÷Ê ' ÷Ê &' ! 5' ÷Ê &' !
)Ê
)Ê
)Ê )Ê
)Ê
- c& -& , & + ÷Ê ÷Ê ÷Ê ÷Ê '' 1 0 * ÷Ê 1+0,1 0 * ÷Ê &%c,1 0 * +& ÷Ê & + - cc0 & ÷Ê +
! ÷Ê
! ' & --- %*& * +& -& ÷Ê &'' % ! ÷Ê % &
To understand the new recruitment & selection practices and concepts followed in the IT organizations TABLE-1 Sources of Recruitment Sources
!
. "D; ?? $ !' 7 + ? < ! ) ' ' 8 & '> '
! $ '! '> '' ! $ 7 $ ! Table 3 Effectiveness of Recruitment Sources Sources
Avg ± no. of respondents AD
! (D
< ! (A
(@ + "A (( + ' A( # ' "A "DB
Avg - percent (:; "B; "(; "(; =; ""; "E; =;
!
"
+% A
(:;
! . "B; ! $ ! + ' ? < ! ? "E;?"(;"(; ! ! . (D;(@; ' '
! -! AD;? (E;? ((; '
$ ? -! ! $ 9 8 * 9 ! '> & '> !' ?. ?&
! ! F ! $ ! TABLE ± 5 USE Six Sigma in Recruiting
+* E @ ":
+ - E: @:
CHART 5
0
.
+*,-
#+.*/
E:;: ' ! ! F # )6$$ !'> ! ' ' $ F ! ' TABLE ± 8 provision of company handbook Response Total +% C
Actual ": : ":
Percentage "::; :;
0
.
0
.
'>! ' $ ()@? !
! ? ? ?
$ ? ! ' $ $
! , +8 '>
! '
G F
! )
7 ' ' ' TABLE ± 10 use of Human Resource Information System in HR functions % ,
'
+ '5 ' + '
' '>9
= D
' ""; "@;
C E
"(; D;
E @ B
D; E; C;
' 5
%
'5 !
c! '
E A E "
D; B; D; (;
( A EE
A; B;
+% ": ! ' ! $ '> !' F $ ' ' ' ' !
'> ! 7 ' ' ' ' ' '
! TABLE ± 14 Methods used to upgrade the competencies of employees # ' +'9 ' + ) )6$
= C C A B A"
' (A; (E; (E; ":; "E;
% +% 8 + & 9 " ":( & %
9
+% "@ ' !
' ' ! '
' # ' ' ' $ $! ! 9
'
# '
' ' ?! A @A;
> : :;
( + B + @ ! '
"A; B
AA;
"
"@; (
E=;
AA; A
(:;
"
"@; "
AA;
(=; @
(=;
(
(D; :
:;
Chart 16 * &(%!%
% 7% +&& %% 7%
+ %%%' % % ;%' & %< ! .& . & %< ! & %< ! & %< !
+ ' ' $ ! ' $ ' '>AA; ' > ' ? (=; $' (=; ! ' AA; >' (=; !' , +8 ! ' $'? ? $ '> ? ! ! '
+ '> '' '$
! TABLE ± 17 benchmarking of training methods
+* E @ ":
+ - E: @:
+% "=
+*,-
0
.
#+.*/
0
.
E:; $ ' '>? @:; $ ' , +8 ' ' '> ! >
TABLE ± 18 different career initiatives taken up . & ' +
) ' -) ' '>' '
E = ": @ E
' "B; "C; (E; ":; "B;
E AE
"B; "::;
+"C
+ ) ' ' ! !
% ?'> ' '
! ' (E; '
"C; '"B; ? "B; '> ' ":; ! ' ') '
, +8 '
! ! ' ?6$ ' TABLE ± 19 Practices of rewarding or providing incentives for employee suggestion Response Total
Actual ": : ":
Percentage "::; :; CHART 19
3
+&& =% % %
"::; ! !
!$ '' '! ! !
, +8 '> ! > % ! ! !' '> '
$' ! !! '> ! !
'! $' !! ? ! '! $' ! Table ± 20 Objectives which drives pay and reward changes !
,
+ ! !' ' !
C E D E E AB
' (A; "=; (E; "=; "=;
CHART 20
(EB '
$ '$6 ! ' (A;
' !
!. "=; ! "=; $' ! !' ' , +8 $ ' !
! ! '> To find out the new roles of the HR department in managing performance and study the new employment practices followed in the organizations Table ± 21 type of appraisal form across different levels + c
: ": A "A
' :; ==; (A;
3
+&& =% 9 % %
CHART 21
! !
$ $
==; ! . (A; ! , +8
' '
! ' ' 6$ ! !$ ' $ ! ! ! $ % ? '> ! TABLE ± 22 right match of competencies which gives best performance &! . ! !
B C E "D
' (E; @(; A(;
5%%
6 7 % &
%
CHART 22
' !$
'! $ @(; $ ! F ! ! $' ' A(; F ! (E; F$ ! , +8 '? ? ! $!$ !$ $ !$ ' 6$ $ 'B
$ TABLE ± 23 Use of competency mapping in performance management CHART 23
+* @ E ":
+ - @:; E:; "::;
+*,-
0
.
#+.*/
0
.
@:; ' ' . E:; > ' , +8 + '!!
$ ' $ $
#(@* +&&
+* ( C ":
+ - (:; C:; "::;
3
3
+*,-
0
#+.*/
.
0
.
+% (@ C:; ! +&& '>? (:; ! +&&? '$ Table 25 Level of PCMM achieved ! " ! ( ! A ! @ ! B +(B
( (
' : : : : (:;
(:; ! ! ! B C:; ' +&& TABLE 26 Plans of implementing PCMM
+* C
+ - C:
: C
:
+*,-
0
.
#+.*/
0
.
+% (E C:; ?! +&&? ' +&& '> , +8
+&& !'' '> ! ! ' ! $ '> ? ! ? ! ? '>
! ! $
+&& ' % cI& +&& $
$ '>? >' ' '> ! +&& ' '>? ! ! $ TABLE ± 27 Uses of competency mapping / PCMM model creates a difference in performance ''
'
' :; :;
* '
''
@ E ":
:; @:; E:;
3
$ ' !%
$& 1 !%
, ! %! !
$& 1 $ '
Chart 27 E:; ' '
' 9
+&& ! ? @:; '
! , +8 ' 9 +&& ! $ '> ! '>? % ! ! !' ? $ F ' '> $ % ? ' 7 9 ? ! > '! ' TABLE 28 Process Mapping in HR functions
+* @ E ":
+ - @: E:
+*,-
0
#+.*/
.
0
.
CHART 28
@:; ! ' % ? E:; ! ' #(E" '% ,
View more...
Comments