Curriculum Design

March 18, 2019 | Author: Antonio Delgado | Category: Curriculum, Attitude (Psychology), Learning, Evaluation, Theory
Share Embed Donate


Short Description

Download Curriculum Design...

Description

By Mr. Antonio T. Delgado, BSE III General De Jesus College

Definition of Curriculum, revisited  Curriculum Design, defined  Types of Curriculum Design  Elements of Curriculum Design  Selection of Objectives  Selection of Content  Selection of Learning Experiences 



The sum of learning stated as educational ends, educational activities, school subjects and/or topics decided upon and provided within the framework of an educational institution or in a less formal setup ( Garcia, 2007).



All the learning which is planned and guided by the school, whether it is carried on in groups or individually, inside or outside the school.



something's form and structure (Microsoft® Encarta® 2009) 



way something is made (Microsoft® Encarta® 2009) 



Refers to the structure or the arrangement of the components or elements of a curriculum

may be broadly categorized into the following major groups: 1. Traditional or subject centered designs 2. Learner-centered designs 3. Problem-centered or societycentered designs 

Are subject-centered  The emphasis is on making the learners absorb as much knowledge as possible concerning a particular course or broad field  Are easy to develop and to implement because highly-structured 

Criticized because they do not make provisions for the differential needs and interests of learners  Most popular not only in the Philippines but in most parts of the world 

May be based on the anticipated needs and interest of the learners  Usually built upon normal activities children engage in (i.e. playing, storytelling, drawing)  Content is not organized into subjects (Math, Science, etc.) but into courseworks (playing, storytelling) 



The three R’s are integrated into the

courseworks  Criticized as neglecting the intellectual development of learners

Heavily loaded with societal concerns, problems and issues  May be aimed at making the school, the teachers and the students agents of social change 

What educational purposes should the school seek to attain?  What educational experience can be provided that is likely to obtain the purpose?  How can these educational experiences be effectively organized?  How can we determine whether these purposes are being attained? 

1. 2. 3. 4.

Aims and objectives Content and learning experiences Method and organization Evaluation

TECHNICAL-SCIENTIFIC 



NON-SCIENTIFIC

Emphasis on wellformulated objectives



These objectives are the bases for selection and organization of  content and evaluation procedure.



Does not usually proceed from predetermined objectives Interests, needs and concerns of learner are bases for selection and organization of  content and evaluation of  learning.



Based on desired outcomes of  teaching-learning process: development of knowledge, skills, values, attitudes and habits

– provides basis for general theory of education and suggests its goals

– are considered as “orientations” – are specific statements used as guidelines for achieving purposes – may describe school-wide outcomes or specific behaviors

The major educational philosophies are:  Perennialism  Essentialism  Humanism/Progressivism  Reconceptualism  Reconstructionism



Oldest and most traditional



“perennial” means everlasting

Education is viewed as the transmission of the unchanging knowledge of the universe  Focus is on permanent studies which are timeless (e.g. philosophy, logic, etc.) 

Protest against perennialist thinking  Education is viewed as human development that starts from the needs and interest of learners.  Focuses more on the child than the subject matter 

Related to progressivism  Learner-centered, relevant and humanistic education  More emphasis on holistic, transcendental, linguistic and artistic aspects of the teaching-learning process 

Surfaced in opposition to progressivism  Education is viewed as mastery of  essential skills. 



Focus is on the three R’s, English, history and science.

Criticized progressivists’ overemphasis on child-centered learning  Is society-centered  Asserts that the creation of a better society is the ultimate purpose of  education  Focus is alleviating discrimination and poverty, school integration 

Three Different Domains  Cognitive  Affective  Psychomotor

LEVEL

BEHAVIORAL TERMS



Knowledge



define, describe, identify 



Comprehension



explain, paraphrase, infer 



Application



solve, predict, operate 



Analysis



differentiate, relate, select 



Synthesis



organize, create, develop 



Evaluation



appraise, criticize, judge 

LEVEL

BEHAVIORAL TERMS



Receiving



listen, watch, observe 



Responding



answer, assist, comply 



Valuing



prefer, appreciate, justify 



Organization



adhere, defend, accept 



Characterization



display, influence, practice 

CATEGORY  

Reflex movements Fundamental movements



Perceptual abilities



Physical Abilities



Skilled movements



Non-discussive communication

THESE INCLUDE: 

Segmental /inter reflex 



Walk, run, jump, push 



Visual, auditory, tactile 



Endurance, strength 



Games, sports, dances 



Posture, gesture 

IN FAVOR 





Provide criteria for assessment Facilitate communication of  intended outcomes Measurable outcomes

AGAINST 





Behavioral change cannot be equated with learning Denies the student of  freedom of choice Creativity and innovativeness can be overlooked



DepEd has come out in full support of  behavioral objectives for classroom use.

Content can have different meanings:  A list of subjects for a grade or year level  A discipline (i.e. science, math)  A specific subject (e.g. biology, physics)

Content has three components which are considered in selection of content: 1. Knowledge 2. Process/skill 3. Affective

– regularities in objects of  events designated by labels Ex: concept of water (liquid, colorless) – significant relationships between and among concepts

Ex: Water boils at 100˚C

– contain a set of logically related principles that attempt to explain a phenomenon Ex: Theory of Relativity – theories that have wide applicability and have been continuously proven to hold true. Ex: Laws of Motion

– used in handling, dealing with or transforming t ransforming information and concepts

– used for moving and handling objects

– have feeling and emotional tones

Ex: openness, respect for others’ rights – serve as basis for determining when attitudes and behaviors are appropriate and which are not. Ex: truth, honesty, justice

– Content reflects the social, cultural and technological realities of  the time – There is a balance between the two polar goals of education: what is constant and constant and what is changing . There should also be balance between the three domains of  learning.

– refers to accuracy or inaccuracy of the content. Content should also coincide with the expressed aims of the curriculum. – Content should be selected in consideration with the

learners’ level of development.

– This criterion considers: •









resources (human, physical and financial) time allotment school calendar enabling legislation public support

Instructional component of the curriculum providing for the interaction between teacher, student and content  These include:  Teaching methods Learning activities 

– Learning experiences should be suitable to content,

objectives, domain, and learners’ level of development. – feasible in terms of time, qualification, experience of staff, available resources, safety and legal considerations

– Different activities and methods are required by different disciplines and domains. – Learning experiences should encourage learners to continue learning on their own.

subject-centered learner centered social-centered

• • •

cognitive psychomotor

• •

scope sequence

concrete abstract









Curriculum Development: The  Philippine Experience.  Garcia, Dolores (2007). Designing  Curriculum. Rex Book Store.  Reyes, Flordeliza C. (2000). Engineering the Curriculum. De La Salle University Press. 

View more...

Comments

Copyright ©2017 KUPDF Inc.
SUPPORT KUPDF