Cruz vs Sun Holidays (Digest)

March 18, 2017 | Author: KathrinaFernandez | Category: N/A
Share Embed Donate


Short Description

Download Cruz vs Sun Holidays (Digest)...

Description

Cruz vs. Sun Holidays 622 SCRA 389 Facts: In 2000 newly weds Ruelito and his wife brought a package tour contract from Sun Holidays. The tour was scheduled from September 911, 2016 inclusive of transportation to and from the resort. On the last day, due to heavy rains the day before and heavy winds, the couple along with other guests trekked to the other side of the beach where they boarded M/B Coco Beach III. Shortly after the boat sailed, it started to rain and when the reached the open seas the wind got stronger causing the boat to tilt from side to side and eventually capsized putting all passengers underwater. Ruelito and his wife perished from the accident which, prompted his parents to filed a complaint for damages against Sun Holidays alleging that the latter failed to observed extraordinary diligence as common carrier in allowing the boat to sail despite a storm warning. Sun Holidays denied responsibility claiming that they are not a common carrier hence they are only required to observe ordinary diligence and the accident was due to a fortuitous event. Issue: W/N Sun Holidays is a common carrier within the ambit of the law hence liable for damages. Ruling: YES. Article 1732 of the Civil Code defining “common carriers” has deliberately refrained from making distinctions on whether the carrying of persons or goods is the carrier’s principal business, whether it is offered on a regular basis, or whether it is offered to the general public. The intent of the law is thus to not consider such distinctions. Otherwise, there is no telling how many other distinctions may be concocted by unscrupulous businessmen engaged in the carrying of persons or goods in order to avoid the legal obligations and liabilities of common carriers. The evidence shows that PAGASA issued 24-hour public weather forecasts and tropical cyclone warnings for shipping on September 10 and 11, 2000 advising of tropical depressions in Northern Luzon, which would also affect the province of Mindoro. By the testimony of Dr. Frisco Nilo, supervising weather specialist of PAGASA, squalls are to be expected under such weather condition. A very cautious person exercising the utmost diligence would thus not brave such stormy weather and put other people’s lives at

risk. The extraordinary diligence required of common carriers demands that they take care of the goods or lives entrusted to their hands as if they were their own. This respondent failed to do.

View more...

Comments

Copyright ©2017 KUPDF Inc.
SUPPORT KUPDF