Cost Accounting by DeLeon

Cost Accounting Chapter 2 - Costs – Concepts and classification Problem 1 1. Direct 2. Indirect 3. Direct 4. Direct 5. Direct

6. Direct 7. Direct 8. Indirect 9. Direct 10.Direct

Problem 2 1. Manufacturing 2. Selling 3. Manufacturing 4. Selling 5. Administrative

Problem 3 1. Variable 2. Variable 3. Fixed 4. Variable 5. Fixed 6. Fixed 7. Fixed 8. Variable 9. Fixed 10.Fixed

Product Product Product Product Product Period Period Period Product Period

Direct Direct Indirect Direct Indirect Indirect Indirect Direct Indirect Indirect

Problem 4 – Bug Company 1. Fixed Period 2. Fixed Inventoriable 3. Variable Inventoriable 4. Variable Inventoriable 5. Fixed Inventoriable

6. Variable 7. Variable 8. Fixed 9. Fixed 10. Fixed

Period Inventoriable Inventoriable Period Inventoriable

Problem 5 – Rounin Manufacturing Company 1. Direct materials Direct labor Prime cost 2.

Direct labor FO (10,000 + 9,000 +25000) Conversion costs

3.

Direct materials Direct labor Factory overhead Product costs

Problem 6 – Mother Goose Company 1. Prime costs 2. Conversion cost

6. Manufacturing 7. Administrative 8. Selling 9. Administrative 10.Selling

50,000 60,000 110,000 60,000 44,000 104,000 50,000 60,000 44,000 154,000 -

430,000 525,000

3 Inventoriable cost 4. Total period costs Problem 7 – Blanche Corporation ` 1. Direct materials used Direct labor Variable manufacturing overhead Variable marketing Total variable cost per unit X No. of units produced and sold Total variable costs per month

-

710,000 305,000 P 30.00 20.00 15.00 3.00 68.00 20,000 P 1,360,000

2. Fixed manufacturing overhead Fixed marketing costs Total fixed cost per unit X No. of units produced and sold Total fixed costs per month

Page 2 – Chapter 2 Prblem 8 1. Direct materials Direct labor Variable manufacturing overhead Total variable manufacturing cost per unit `

2. Total variable manufacturing cost per unit Variable marketing and administrative Total variable costs per unit

P 10.00 4.00 14.00 20,000 P 280,000

P 60.00 30.00 9.00 P 99.00 P 99.00 6.00 105.00

3. Total variable manufacturing cost per unit P 99,00 Fixed manufacturing overhead (30,000/1,200) 25.00 Full manufacturing cost per unit 124.00 4. Full manufacturing cost per unit Variable marketing and administrative Fixed marketing and administrative Full cost to make and sell per unit Problem 9 - Chiz Manufacturing Company 1. Materials put into production Direct labor Prime costs

124.00 6.00 20.00 150.00 P 90,000 95,000 P 185,000

2. Direct labor Factory overhead Indirect materials Indirect labor Other overhead cost Total conversion costs

95.000 60,000 25,000 60,000

3. Direct materials Direct labor Factory overhead Total product costs

145,000 240,000 90,000 95,000 145,000 330,000

4. none Problem 10 – Johnson Corporation 1. Variable cost per machine hour = 35,600 – 20,000 4,000 - 2,000 = 7.50 per machine hour 2. Total electricity expense Less: Variable costs ( 4,000 x 7.50) ( 2000 x 7.50) Fixed cost 3.

4,000 hours 35,000

2000 hours 20,000

30,000 ______ 5,000

Fixed cost Variable cost ( 6,000 x 7.50) Totl manufacturing costs

15,000 5,000 5,000 45,000 50,000

Problem 11 – Valdez Motors Co. 1. Variable cost per machine hour = 5,475 – 3,975 210 - 145 = 23.08 per machine hour 2. Total overhead costs Less: Variable costs ( 210 x 23.08) ( 145 x 23.08) Fixed cost Page 3 Problem 12 – Justine Company

210 hours 5,475 4,847 _____ 628

145 hours 3,975 3,347 628

1

Variable cost per hour = 4,470 – 2,820 520 - 300 = 7.50 per hour

2.

520 hours Total Less: Variable cost 520 x 7.50 300 x 7.50 Fixed cost

3.

Total cost = P 570 + P7,50 X

4.

Fixed cost Variable ( 420 hrs. x P 7.50) Total maintenance cost

4,470 3,900 _____ 570

P

300 hours 2,820 2,250 570

570 3,150 P 3,720

True/False Questions 1. False 6. True 2. False 7. False 3. True 8. True 4. False 9. False 5. False 10. True

11. False 12. False 13. True 14. False 15. False

16. True 17. False 18. True 19. False 20. True

Multiple choice – Theory 1. B 6. A 2. C 7. D 3. B 8. D 4. C 9. B 5. D 10. C

11. C 12. A 13. C 14. B 15. B

16. B 17. B 18. A 19. D 20. B

Multiple choice – Problems 1. A 6. A 2. B 7. C 3. C 8. C 4. C 9. A 5. B 10. C

11. A 12. B 13. B 14. C 15. B

16. A 17. B 18. D 19. A 20. A

CHAPTER 3 - COST ACCOUNTING CYCLE Problem 1 - Ram Manufacturing Company

Direct materials used (75,000 x 90%) 67,500.00 Direct labor (97,000 x 93% ) 90,210.00 Factory overhead (90,210 x 12%) Total manufacturing costs Work in process, January 1 Cost of goods put into process 295,972.50 Less: Work in process, January 31 Cost of goods manufactured 268,972.50 Problem 2 - Donna Company Direct materials used Materials, May 1 Purchases Total available Less> Mat.- May 31 97,000 Direct labor Factory overhead Total manufacturing costs Work in process, May 1 Cost of goods put into process 322,800 Less: Work in process, May 31 Cost of goods manufactured 304,800 Finished goods – May 1 Total goods available for sale 349,800 Less: Finished goods – May 31 Cost of goods sold

112,762.50 270,472.50 25,500.00 27,000.00

22,000 100,000 122,000 25,000 80,000 120,000 297,000 25,800 18,000 45,000 24,000 325,800

Problem 3 – Blanche Corporation 1, Income Statement Sales 1,200,000 Less: Cost of goods sold 751,000 Gross profit 449,000 Less: Operating expenses Marketing 60,000 Administrative 12,000 72,000

Net income

Blanche Corporation 2. Direct materials used Materials, March 1 Purchases Total available Less> Mat.- March 31 408,000 Direct labor Factory overhead Total manufacturing costs Work in process, March 1 Cost of goods put into process 858,000 Less: Work in process, March 31 Cost of goods manufactured 763,000 Finished goods – March 1 Total goods available for sale 853,000 Less: Finished goods – March 31 Cost of goods sold Problem 4 - Roy Company 1, Entries a. Materials Accounts payable b. Payroll Withholding taxes payable SSS Premiums payable Phil Health contributions payable Pag-ibig funds contributions payable 1,620 Accrued payroll Work in process

377,000

50,000 400,000 450,000 42,000 210,000 140,000 758,000 100,000 95,000 90,000 102,000 751,000

120,000 120,000 54,000 11,200 2,400 375 38,405 45,000

Factory overhead control Payroll

9,000

54,000 c. Materials Accounts payable

25,000 25,000

d. Factory overhead control SSS premiums payable Phil Health contributions payable Pag-ibig funds contributions payable

5,595 3,600 375 1.620

e. Work in process Factory overhead control Materials

75,000

f. Accounts payable Materials

1,000

Page 2 – Chapter 3 g. Accounts payable Accrued payroll Cash

14,000 89,000 1,000 136,500 38,405 174,905

h. Factory overhead control Miscellaneous accounts i. Work in process Factory OH Applied (45,000 x 120%)

16,900 16,900 54,000 54,000

j. Finished goods Work in process

116.000 116,000

k. Accounts receivable Sales

150,000 150,000

Cost of goods sold Finished goods 2. Statement of cost of goods sold . Direct materials used Purchases Less: Purchase returns Total available for use Less> Mat.- October 31 89,000

90,000 90,000

145,000 1,000 144,000 55,000

Direct labor Factory overhead Total manufacturing costs Less: Work in process, October 31 Cost of goods manufactured 116,000 Less: Finished goods – March 31 Cost of goods sold, normal Less: OA-FO Cost of goods sold, actual Problem 5 – Darvin Company 1. Entries a. Materials Accounts payable

45,000 54,000 188,000 72,000 26,000 90,000 8,505 81,495 200,000 200,000

b. FOControl Accounts payable c. Payroll W/Taxes payable SSS Premium payable

35,000 35,000 210,000 18,520

8,400 Phil Health contributions payable PFC payable Accrued payroll

1,125 6,300 175,655

Page 4 Work in process Factory Overhead control Selling expense control Adm. expense control Payroll 210,000

140,000

d. Accrued payroll Cash

175,000 175,000

e. FO Control Selling expense control Adm. Expense control SSS prem. Payable MC payable PFC payable

30,000 25,000 15,000

14,200 2,375 1,350 10,500 1,125 6,300

f. Work in process FO Control Materials

185,000 35,000

g. Work in process FO Control

114,200

h. Finished goods Work in process

410,000

220,000 114,200 410,000

i. Accounts receivable Sales

539,000 539,000

Costs of goods sold Finished goods 385,000

385,000

j. Cash Accounts receivable

405,000 405,000

k. Accounts payable Cash

Page 5 2. Cost of goods sold statement Direct materials used Materials, January 1 Purchases Total available Less> Mat.- Jan. 31 Ind. Materials 185,000 Direct labor Factory overhead Total manufacturing costs

220,000 220,000

50,000 200,000 250,000 30,000 35,000 65,000 140,000 114,200 439,200

Work in process, January 1 Cost of goods put into process 457,200 Less: Work in process, January 31 Cost of goods manufactured 410,000 Finished goods – January 1 Total goods available for sale 445,000 Less: Finished goods – January 31 Cost of goods sold 3. Income Statement Sales Less: Cost of goods sold Gross profit Less: Operating expenses Selling Administrative 43,725 Net income 4 Balance sheet Cash 25,000 Accounts receivable 8,655 Finished goods 18,520 Work in process 18,900 Materials 2,250

18,000 47,200 35,000 60,000 385,000 539,000 385,000 154,000 27,375 16,350 110,275

110,000

Accounts payable

194,000

Accrued payroll 60,000

W/tax payable

47,200

SSS Prem. payable

30,000

Medicare Cont. payable PFC payable Common stock

12,600

200,000 _______ 441,200

Total

Retained earnings

155,275

441,200 Problem 6 1. Cost of goods manufactured Work in process, December 31 Cost of goods put into process Total manufacturing costs Work in process, January 1

800,000 87,000 887,000 ( 790,000) 97,000

Page 6 2. Cost of goods manufactured Finished goods, January 1 Total goods available for sale Cost of goods sold Finished goods, December 31 4.

Direct materials used Materials, December 31 Total available for sale Materials, January 1 Materials purchased

800,000 80,000 880,000 (750,000) 130,000 590,000 150,000 740,000 (100,000) 640,000

Problem 7 – Kyle Manufacturing Company 1. Direct materials used ( 300.000 x 75%) 225,000 Direct labor (350,000 x 60%) 210.000 Factory overhead – actual Indirect materials (300,000 x 25%) 75,000 Indirect labor (350,000 x 40%) 140,000 Heat, light, and water 120,000 Depreciation 75,000 Property taxes 65,000 Repairs and maintenance 40,000 515,000 Total manufacturing costs/cost of goods manufactured 950,000 2, 3. 4. 5

Unit cost = 950,000/125,000 = P7.60 per unit Prime cost = 225000 + 210,000 = P 435,000 Conversion cost = 210,000 + 515,000 = P 725,000 Period cost = 80,000 + 50,000 = P 130,000

Problem 8 - Norman Company 1, Materials, October 1 Purchases Materials, October 31 Direct materials used Direct labor Factory overhead (80,000 = 12,500 x 8.00) 6,40 Total manufacturing costs 2.

Total manufacturing costs Work in process, Oct. 1

48,000 112,000 (40,000) 120,000 80,000 100,000 300,000 300,000 24,000

3.

Work in process, Oct. 31 Cost of goods manufactured

( 16,000) 308,000

Cost of goods manufactured Finished goods, Oct. 1 Finished goods, Oct. 31 Cost of goods sold

308,000 72,000 ( 80,000) 300,000

Page 7 4. Sales Cost of goods sold Marketing and administrative expenses Net income

400,000 ( 300,000) ( 40,000) 60,000

Problem 9 – Janice Company 1, Sales (50,000/10%) Selling & administrative expenses Net income Cost of goods sold

500,000 ( 50,000) ( 50,000) 400,000

2.

Cost of goods sold Finished goods, March 31 Finished goods, March 1 Cost of goods manufactured

400,000 180,000 ( 120,000) 460,000

3.

Cost of goods manufactured Work in process, March 31 Work in process, March 1 Total manufacturing costs Factory overhead Direct labor (126,000/75%) Direct materials used 176,000 Materials, March 31 Purchases Materials, March 1

460.000 100,000 ( 90,000) 470,000 (126,000) (168,000) 20,000 (100,000) 96,000

Problem 10 - Selina Corporation 1. Cost of goods manufactured Work in process, December 31 Cost of goods put into process Cost of goods manufactured + WP, end = TMC + WP, beg 1700,000 + X = 1,800,000 + .80X X - .80X = 1,800,000 – 1,700,000

1,700,000 500,000 2,200,000

X

= =

2.

WP, Dec. 31 = 500,000

3.

Total manufacturing cost Factory overhead ( (1,800,000 x 25% ) Direct labor (450,000/72%) Direct materials used

100,00/.20 500,000 1,800,000 ( 450,000) ( 625,000) 725,000

Problem 11 - Kyra Alexis Corporation 1. Materials put into process Materials, Aug. 31 Materials, Aug. 1 Materials purchased Page 8 2. Materials put into process Direct labor ( 70,000 + 80,000) Factory overhead - A (70,000 x 120%) B ( 80,000 x 80%) Total manufacturing cost

120,000 75,000 ( 60,000) 135,000 120,000 150,000 84,000 64,000

148,000 418,000

3.

Total manufacturing cost Work in process, Aug. 1 Work in process, Aug. 31 Cost of goods manufactured

418,000 80,000 ( 64,000) 434,000

4.

Cost of goods manufactured Finished goods, Aug. 1 Finished goods, Aug. 31 Cost of goods sold

434,000 54,000 ( 60,000) 428,000

Multiple choice 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.

A C B A D B

11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16.

B C B C C D

7. D 8 C 9. B 10.B

17. 18. 19 20.

B B B B

21. B 22. D 23. A 24. B 25. 116,000 26. A (No. 5 should be 73% 27. D 28. A 29. A 30. B

Chapter 4 True or False 1. False 2. True 3. True 4. False 5. True

6. True 7. False 8. False 9. True 10.False

11. False 12. False 13. False 14. False 15. False

Matching 1. a 2. h 3. p 4. d 5. k

6. 7. 8. 9. 10.

Multiple choice – Theory 1, d 6. d 2. b 7. a 3. b 8. c 4. d 9. b 5. d 10. c

11. 12. 13. 14. 15.

16.True 17. False 18. False 19. True 20. True

21. True 22. False 23. False 24. False 25. True

16. 17. 18 19. 20.

21. 22. 23. 24. 25.

b g k, l, m i n d d c b c

a c b b b

c b a c b

Problem 1 – Garcia Company 1 Journal entries 1. Materials Accounts payable 2.

3. 4. 5.

Work in process Factory overhead control Materials Materials Work in process FO Control Accounts payable Materials

28,000 28,000 22,000 3.000 25,000 800 500 300 1,000 1,000

Payroll 39,000 Withholding taxes payable 3,025 SSS Premiums payable 1,600 Phil Health contributions payable 375 Pag-ibig funds contributions payable 1,200 Accrued payroll 32,800

Page 2 Accrued payroll Cash

32,800

Work in process Factory overhead control Payroll

33,400 5,600

Factory Overhead Control SSS Premiums payable Phil Health cont. payable Pag-ibig cont. payable

3,575

FO Control Accum Depr. Prepaid ins. Accounts payable

15,000

9.

Work in process FO Applied

26,720 26,720

10.

Finished goods WP Job 401 Job 402

72,220 72,220

6.

7.

8

11.

12.

32,800

39,000 2,000 375 1,200 3,000 950 11,050

31,720 40,500

Accounts receivable Sales (31,720 x 140%)

44,408 44,408

Cost of goods sold FG

31,720 31,720

Cash

35,000 35,000

Accounts receivable Direct materials 3,000 5,500 8,500 Direct materials 5,600 7,000

Job 401 Direct labor 2,500 10,400 12,900

Factory overhead 2,000 8,320 10,320

Job 402 Direct labor 3,000 12,500

Factory overhead 2,400 10,000

12,600

15,500

12,400

Page 3 Direct materials 9,500 ( 500) 3.

Job 403 Direct labor 10,500

Factory overhead 8,400

Cost of goods sold statement Direct materials used Materials, August 1 Purchases Less. Purchase returns Total available for use Less: Materials, Aug. 31 Ind. Materials Direct labor Factory overhead Total manufacturing costs Work in process, Aug. 1 Cost of goods put into process Less: Work in process, Aug. 31

22,000 28,000 1,000 24,800 2,700

27,000 49,000 27,500

Cost of goods manufactured Finished goods, Aug. 1 Total goods available for sale Less: Finished goods, Aug. 31 Cost of goods sold - normal Add. Under applied factory overhead Cost of goods sold Problem 2 - Golden Shower Company 2. Journal entries a. Materials Accounts payable````` X 20,000 x 5.20 = 104,000 Y 24,000 x 3.75 = 90,000 Ind. Materials 35,040 b. Payroll Withholding taxes payable SSS premiums payable Phil Health cont. payable Pag-ibig funds cont. payable Accrued payroll

21,500 33,400 26.720 81,620 18,500 100.120 27,900 72,220 25,000 97,220 65,500 31,720 155 31,875

229,040 229,040

220,000 31,000 7,000 440 6,600 174,960

Accrued payroll Cash Page 4otal

174,960 174,960

c. Work in process Factory overhead control Marketing & Adm. Exp. Control Payroll

156,000 24,000 40,000 220,000

Factory overhead control Marketing & adm. Exp. Control SSS Premiums payable Phil Health contr. Payable Pag-ibig funds contribution payable SSS (5%) FOC (180,000) 9,000 M & A Exp.control 2,000 11,000

Phil Health (0,.25%) 360 80 440

14,760 3,280 11,000 440 6,600 Pag-ibig ( 3% ) 5,400 1,200 6,600

d. Work in process Factory overhead control Materials Job 101 (x) 4,000 x 5.00 (x) 16,000 x 5.20 Job 103 ( x) 2,000 x 5.20 (Y) 5,000 x 3.75

20,000 83,200 103,200

Cost of goods sold

14,760 3,280 18.040

216,350 15,040 231,390 Job 102 (Y) 8,000 x 3.00 (Y) 16,000 x 3.75

24,000 60,000 84,000

10,400 18,750 29,150

e. Work in process FO Applied Job 101 = 10,000 x 2.25 102 = 16,000 x 2.25 103 = 12,000 x 2.25 f. Accounts receivable Sales

Total

85,500 85,500 22,500 36,000 27,000 510,000 510,000 380,700

Work in process

380,700

Page 5 g. Cash Sales discount Accounts receivable

494,000 26,000 520,000

h. Marketing & Adm. Exp. Control Factory overhead control Cash Accum. Depreciation

30,000 25,600 51,600 4,000

i. Accounts payable Cash j.

170,000 170,000

Factory overhead applied Cost of goods sold FO Control

85,500 6,100 79,400

DIRECT MATERIALS 5,000 103,200 108,200

JOB 101 DIRECT LABOR 4,000 44,000 44,000

FACTORY OVERHEAD 2,000 22,500 24,500

DIRECT MATERIALS 1,200 84,000 85,200

JOB 102 DIRECT LABOR 2,000 80,000 82,000

FACTORY OVERHEAD 800 36,000 36,800

DIRECT MATERIALS 21,.950

JOB 103 DIRECT LABOR 36,000

FACTORY OVERHEAD 27,000

STOCKCARDS MATERIAL X ISSUED

RECEIVED 20,000 @ 5.20

BALANCE 4,000 @ 5.00 20,000 4,000 @ 5.00 20,000 20,000 @ 5/20 104,000

104,000 4,000 @ 5.00 18,000 @ 5.20

20,000 93,000

2,000 @ 5.20

10,400

MATERIAL Y ISSUED

RECEIVED 24,000 @ 3.75

BALANCE 8,000 @ 3.00 24,000 8,000 @ 3.00 24,000 24,000 @ 3.75 90,000

90,000 8,000 @ 3.00 21,000 @ 3.75

24,000 78,750

3,000 @ 3.75

Problem 3 - J.A.N., Inc. 1. Direct material Direct labor (300 x 8) Factory OH (200 x 15) Total mfg. cost

4,300 2,400 3,000 9,700

2. Direct material Direct labor Prime cost

4,300 2,400 6,700

3. Direct material Factory overhead applied Conversion cost

2,400 3,000 5,400

Problem 4 – 1. Materials – Dept. 1 Dept. 2

2.400 1,300 3,700

3. Dept. 1 (500 x 4.00) Dept. 2 (320 x 1.00)

4,100 1,760 5,860

4. Contract price Less: Cost to manufacture DM. 3,700 DL 5,860 FO 2.320 Gross profit

2. Dept. 1 (500 x 8.20) Dept. 2 (220 x 8.00)

5. Gross profit Less: M & A Net income

13,120 2,970 10,150

Problem 5 - Star Wars Corporation Requirement No. 1 1. Work in process Materials 2.

Work in process

50,000 50,000 150,000

11,250

2,000 320 2,320 P 25,000

11,880 13,120

Payroll

150,000

Page 7 3. Work in process FO Applied

90.000 90,000

4.

Finished goods Work in process

290,000 290,000

5.

Accounts receivable Sales

427,917 427,917

Cost of goods sold Finished goods

290,000 290,000

Selling price Direct materials Direct labor Factory OH Total cost Gross profit

Job 110 126,667 15,000 50,000 30,000 95,000 31,667

Job 220 170,000 10,000 50,000 30,000 90,000 80,000

Job 330 131,250 25,000 50,000 30,000 105,000 26,250

Total 427,917 50,000 150,000 90,000 290,000 137,917

Problem 6 – Ellen Corporation MATERIALS__________ WORK IN PROCESS_______ Beg. 60,000 5) 125,000 Bal. beg. 85,000 2) 820,000 6) 145,000 Bal. end 80,000 5) DM 125,000 205,000 205,000 4) DL 400,000 3) OH 320,000 Bal.end 110,000 930,000 930,000 FINISHED GOODS______ Bal. beg. 120,000 1) 850,000 2) 820,000 Bal. end 90,000 940,000 940,000 7)

FACTORY OH CONROL____ 330,000

Entries 1. Materials Accounts payable

1)

COST OF GOODS SOLD_____ 850,000

FACTORY OH APPLIED _____ 3) 320,000

145000 145,000

2.

Work in process Materials

125,000 125,000

Page 8 3. Work in process Payroll

400,000 400,000

4.

Work in process FO Applied

320,000 320,000

5.

Finished goods Work in process

820,000 820,000

6.

Cost of goods sold Finished goods

850,000 850,000

FO Control Various accounts Problem 7 - Ellen Joyce Company 1. Work in process Materials

330,000 330,000

2.

Work in process Payroll

156,000 156,000

3.

Work in process FO Applied

118,500 118,500

4.

Finished goods Work in process Job 201 Job 202 Job 203 Total Accounts receivable Sales

343,000 343,000

7.

5.

Cost of goods sold Finished goods Cost of goods sold statement Direct materials Direct labor Factory overhead Total manufacturing costs Less: Work in process, end

-

98,500 98,500

190,000 94,000 59,000 343,000 350,000 350.000 284,000 284,000 98,500 156,000 118,500 373,000 30,000

Cost of goods manufactured Less: Finished goods, end Cost of goods sold Page 8 = Abner Corporation 1. Direct materials used Materials – end Materials – beg. Direct materials purchased

343,000 59,000 284,000 205,000 90,000 ( 95,000) 200,000

2.

Total manufacturing costs Factory overhead Materials used Direct labor costs

675,000 ( 175,000) ( 205,000) 295,000

3.

Cost of goods available for sale Finished goods, end Cost of goods sold

775,000 (110,000) 665,000

4.

Sales Cost of goods sold Gross profit Problem 9 - Pacific Production Company 1. Materials - April 1 Purchases Materials – April 30 Direct materials used Indirect materials used

900,000 (665,000) 235,000

2.

Accrued payroll – April 30 Payroll paid Direct labor cost Indirect labor

6,000 44,000 ( 32,000) 18,000

3.

Direct labor cost Factory overhead rate Factory overhead applied

32,000 125%40,000

4.

Direct materials Direct labor Factory overhead Total manufacturing costs Work in process, beg. Work in process, end Cost of goods manufactured

78,000 32,000 40,000 150,000 82,000 ( 94,000) 138,000

5.

Cost of goods manufactured

138,000

64,000 84,000 ( 60,000) ( 78,000) 10,000

Finished goods, April 1 Finished goods, April 30 Cost of goods sold Page 10 Problem 11 – Table and Chair Manufacturing Company 1) Materials Accounts payable

296,000 (304,000) 130,000

2)

Work in process FOC Materials

11,480 40

Payroll Accrued payroll

5,445

Work in process FOC Payroll

4,645 800

FOC

2,875

3)

4)

15,000 15,000

11,520 5,445

5,445

Rent Expense Payable Accum. Depreciation – Machines Accum. Depreciation – Factory Building Utilities Expense Payable Payroll Taxes Payable 5)

Work in process FO Applied

6)

Finished goods Work in process Direct materials Direct labor Factory overhead Total

7)

Cash

1,500 160 490 225 300 5,261.25 5,261.25

Job 101 10,500 3,175 3,618.75 17,293.75

Job 102 980 1,470 1,642.50 4,092.50

21,386.25 21,385.25 Total 11,480 4,645 5,261.25 21,386.25 25,000

Sales Cost of Goods Sold Finished goods

25,000 17,293.75 17,293.75

Accounts receivable Sales

4,000

Cost of goods sold

4,092.50

4,000

Finished goods

4,092.50

Page 11 Problem 11 – Candy Corporation 1)

Job 101 Job 102 WP, July 1

2)

Job 101 Job 102 Job 103 Total

3)

P 175,000 120,000 P 295,000 80,000 x 125% 95,000 x 125% 115,000 x 125%

= P 100,000 = 118,750 = 143,750 362,500

Job 101 175,000

Job 102 120,000

Total 295,000

55,000 80,000 100,000 410,000`

80,000 95,000 118,750 413,750

135,000 175,000 218,750 823,750

Job 101 Add: Underapplied factory overhead Actual FO 375,000 Less: Applied FO 362,500 Cost of goods sold – actual

410,000

5)

FG, Inventory July 31 (Job 102)

413,750

6)

WP, Inventory, July 31 ( Job 103) Materials Labor Factory overhead Total WP Inventory, July 31

92,000 115,000 143,750 350,750

WP, beg. Cost added Materials Labor Overhead Total 4)

Problem 12 – MLT Company 1) Materials, June 1 Purchases Materials, June 30 Indirect materials Direct materials used 2)

Cost of goods manufactured Work in process, June 30

12,500 422,500`

15,000 33,000 ( 19,000) ( 1,000) 28,000 120,000 30,000

3)

Work in process, June 1 Total manufacturing cost

( 40,000) 110,000

Cost of goods available for sale Total manufacturing costs Finished goods, June 1

190,000 (110,000) 80,000

Problem 13 – Miracle Company (start with No.. 3 then No. 2) 1) Cost of goods manufactured 168,000 WP, January 31 95,000 WP, January 1 ( 80,000) Total manufacturing cost 183,000 Direct labor (63,000 / 75%) ( 84,000) Factory overhead ( 63,000) Direct materials used 36,000 Materials January 31 50,000 Indirect materials used 1,000 Purchases ( 46,000) Materials, January 1 41,000 2)

Cost of goods sold – normal Finished goods, January 31 Finished goods, January 1 Cost of goods manufactured

150,000 78,000 ( 60,000) 168,000

3)

Sales ( 25,000 / 12.5%) Selling and administrative expenses Net income Cost of goods sold, actual Overapplied FO Actual 62,800 Less: Applied 63,000 Cost of goods sold, normal

200,000 ( 25,000) (25,200) 149,800 200 150,000

Problem 14 – Nona Company 1)

Units sold Finished goods, end Finished goods, beg Units completed/manufactured

2)

Direct materials used Direct labor Factory overhead Total mfg. cost/cost of goods manufactured Divide by units completed

12,300 300 ( 100) 12,500 1,847,700 2,125,800 1,026,500 5,000,000 12,500

Cost of goods manufactured per unit

400/unit

Page 13 3) From Finished goods, beg. (100 units x P 430 ) From units completed during the period ( 12,200 x P 400) Cost of goods sold Or Finished goods, beg. Cost of goods manufactured Finished goods, end ( 300 x P400) Cost of goods sold

43,000 4,880,000 4,923,000 43,000 5,000,000 ( 120,000) 4,923,000

MULTIPLE CHOICE – PROBLEMS 1. A 11. OH IS APPLIED AT 125% OF DLCOST - B 2. A 12, A 21. C 3. C 13. C 22. C 4. D 14. D 23. C 5. A 15. A 24. B 6. B 16. D 25. 46,000 7. B 17. C 26. D 8. A 18. C 27. B 9. A 19. D 28. B 10. B 20. C 29. D 30. B CHAPTER 5 - JUST IN TIME AND BACKFLUSH ACCOUNTING TRUE/FALSE 1. True 2. True 3. False 4. True 5. True

6. True 7. True 8. True 9. True 10. False

Problem 1 - AJE Corporation 1) Raw and In Process Accounts Payable

16,000

2)

Cost of goods sold Accrued payroll FO Applied

32,000

Finished goods Raw and In Process

13,500

3)

16,000 15,000 17,000 13,500

Raw and In Process Cost of goods sold 4)

1,000 1,000

Cost of goods sold Finished goods

12,700 12700

Finished goods Cost of goods sold

1,700 1,700

Problem 2 – Magnolia Corporation CORRECTION: Direct labor cost P 350,000; Factor overhead – P380,000 1) Raw and In Process 444,000 Accounts payable 444,000 2)

Finished goods Raw and In process Purchases Mat. In RIP beg (23,400-2,400) Mat. In RIP end (25,600-3,600) Mat. Content of FG

443,000 443,000 444,000 21,000 ( 22,000) 443,000

Cost of goods sold Accrued payroll FO Applied Page 2 3) Cost of goods sold Finished goods Mat. Content of FG Mat. In FG beg. (24,000-8,000) Mat. In FG end (19,000-7,000) Mat. Content of units sold 4)

447,000 447,000 443,000 16,000 ( 12,000) 447,000

Raw and In Process Cost of goods sold Conversion cost in RIP end Conversion cost in RIP beg Adjustment

5)

730,000 350,000 380,000

Cost of goods sold Finished goods

1,200 1,200 3,600 ( 2,400) 1,200 1,000 1,000

Conversion cost in FG end Conversion cost in FG beg Adjustment

7,000 (8,000) (1,000)

Problem 3 – Pocahontas Manufacturing Company 1. Materials purchased Materials in RIP beg (11,000 – 1,200) Materials in RIP end (12,400 – 1,700) Materials backflushed from RIP to FG

346,000 9,800 ( 10,700) 345,100

2.

Materials backflushed from RIP to FG Materials in FG beg ( 12,000 – 4,000) Materials in FG end ( 9,800 - 3,100) Materials backflushed from FG to CofGS

345,100 8,000 ( 6,700) 346,400

3)

a) Raw and In process Accounts payable

346,000 346,000

b) Cost of goods sold Accrued payroll FO Applied

250,000 100,000 150,000

c) Finished goods Raw and In Process

345,100 345,100

d) Cost of goods sold Finished goods

346,400 346,400

Page 3 e) Raw and In Process Cost of goods sold Finished goods End Beginning Increase (decrease(

500 400 900 RIP 1,700 (1,200) 500

FG 3,100 (4,000) ( 900)

Problem 4 – Barbie Mfg. Company Additional information – Direct labor 80,000; factory overhead – 60,000 1) Raw and In Process 100,000 Accounts payable 100,000 2)

Finished goods Raw and In Process

99,850 99,850

Materials purchased Materials in RIP beg. (5,000-500) Materials in RIP end (5,250-650) Materials backflushed from RIP 3)

Cost of goods sold Finished goods

102,850 102,850

Materials backflushed from RIP Materials in FG beg. (11,250-3.250) Materials in FG end ( 7,500-2,500) Materials backflushed from CofGS 4)

5)

100,000 4,500 ( 4,650) 99,850

99,850 8,000 ( 5,000) 102,850

Cost of goods sold Accrued payroll FO Applied

140,000 80,000 60,000

Raw and in process Cost of goods sold Finished goods End Beginning Increase (decrease)

150 600 750 RIP 650 (500) 150

FG 2,500 (3,250) 750

Page 3 Problem 5 – Chiz Manufacturing Company 1)

Materials purchased Materials in RIP beg. ( 14,500-7,200) Materials in RIP end ( 22,400-15,700) Materials backflushed from RIP to FG

246.000 7,300 ( 6,700) 246,600

2)

Materials backflushed from RIP to FG Materials in FG beg. (16,000-8,800) Materials in FG end (19,800-13,100) Materials backflushed from FG to CofGS

246,600 7,200 ( 6,700) 247,100

3)

Materials purchased RIP beg. FG beg. Direct labor Factory overhead

246,000 14,500 16,000 98,000 125,000

4)

RIP end FG end Cost of goods sold

( 22,400) ( 19,800) 457,300

a)

Raw and in process Accounts payable

246,000 246,000

b)

Finished goods Raw and in process

246,600 246,600

c)

Cost of goods sold Finished goods

247,100 247,100

d)

Cost of goods sold Accrued payroll FO Applied

223,000

e)

98,000 125,000

Raw and in process Finished goods Cost of goods

8,500 4,300 12,800

END BEGINNING Increase (Decrease)

RIP 15,700 ( 7,200) 8,500

CHAPTER 6 – ACCOUNTING FOR MATERIALS Problem 1 - Norman Company _____________ a) EOQ = \/ 2 x 8,000 x 40 25 = 160 units Ordering cost

= = =

Carrying cost

= =

No of orders x ordering cost 8,000 x 40 160 2,000 Average inventory x 25 160 x 25 2

FG 13,100 ( 8,800) 4,300

=

2000

Problem 2 –Heavyweight Co. 1. Allocation based on cost Product Invoice Percentage X 11,250 49% Y 13,500 49% Z 15,750 49%

Share of Freight 450 540 630

2. Allocation based on shipping weight Product Weight Freight/pound X 4,500 .09 Y 6,000 .09 Z 7,500 .09

Total cost Cost/pound 11,700 2.60 14,040 2.34 16,380 2.184

Share of Freight Total Cost Cost/pound 405 11,655 2.59 540 14,040 2.34 675 16,425 2.19

Problem 3 - Dovin Company 1. Amount debited to Materials = 100,000 x 80% x 90% x 90% = 64,800 2. Amount debited to Materials = 100000 x 80% x 90% x 90% x 98% = 63,504

Page 2 Problem 4 – 1. FIRST-IN, FIRST-OUT Received 5

400 x 7.00

2,800

9

400 x 8.00

3,200

16 24

Issued

800 x 6.00 600 x 9.00

5,400

4,800

Balance 1,600 x 6.00 1,600 x 6.00 400 x 7.00 1,600 x 6.00 400 x 7.00 400 x 8.00 800 x 6.00 400 x 7.00 400 x 8.00 800 x 6.00 400 x 7.00 400 x 8.00

9,600` 9,600 2.800 9,600 2,800 3,200 4,800 2,800 3,200 4,800 2,800 3,200

27

800 x 6.00 200 x 7.00

4,800 1,400

600 x 9.00 200 x 7.00 400 x 8.00 600 x 9.00

5,400 1.400 3,200 5,400

Cost of materials issued = 4,800 + 4,800 + 1,400 = 11,000 Cost of ending inventory = 1,400 + 3,200 + 5,400 = 10,000 2, AVERAGE Received 1 5 400 x 7.00 2,800 9 400 x 8.00 3,200 16 24 600 x 9.00 5,400 27

Issued

800 x 6.50

5,200

1,000 x 7.18

7,180

Balance 1,600 x 6.00 2,000 x 6.20 2,400 x 6.50 1,600 x 6.50 2,200 x 7.18 1,200 x 7.18

9,600 12.400 15,600 10,400 15,800 8,620

Balance 1,000 x 4.00 750 x 4.00 1,250 x 4.20 1,100 x 4.20 990 x 4.20 1,000 x 4.20 1,500 x 4.47 1,200 x 4.33 1,100 x 4.33

4,000 3,000 5,250 4,620 4,158 4,200 6,700 5,200 4,767

Cost of materials issued = 5,200 + 7,180 = 12,380 Cost of ending inventory = 8,620 Problem 5 – Heaven & Earth 1. FIFO Issued = 600 x 4.00 = 2,400 Cost of inventory - 200 x 5.00 =- 1,000 500 x 4.50 = 2,250 400 x 4.00 = 1,000 Page 3 2. WEIGHTED AVERAGE Received 1 3 5 500 x 4.50 2,250 6 10 11 15 500 x 5.00 2,500 20 (300) x 5.00 ( 1,500) 26

Issued 250 x 4.00

1,000

150 x 4.20 110 x 4.20 ( 10)x 4.20

630 462 ( 42)

100 x 4.33

433

Problem 6 – Sterling Company

A. PERPETUAL 1. FIFO Received 1 8 10 900 x 18.00 16,200 18 20 1,200 x 18,25

Issued 200 x 1750

3,500

100 x 17.50 500 x 18.00

1,750 9,000

21,900

25

400 x 18.00 600 x 18.25

2. AVERAGE Received 1 8 10 900 x 18.00 18 20 1,200 x 18.25 25

Balance 300 x 17.50 100 x 17.50 100 x 17.50 900 x 18.00 400 x 18.00

7,200 10,950

Issued 200 x 17.50

3,500

600 x 17.95

10,770

1000 x 18.175

18,175

16,200 21,900

Problem 7 – Bedrock Company a. Loss due to spoiled work is spread over all jobs 1. Work in process Materials Payroll FO Applied Page 4 2. Spoiled Goods FO Control Work in process (100 x 165) 3. Finished goods Work in process Unit cost = 1,303,500/7,900 = 165

400 x 18.00 1,200 x 18.25

7,200 21,900

600 x 18.25

10,950

Balance 300 x 17.50 100 x 17.50 1,000 x 17.95 400 x 17.95 1,600 x 18.175 600 x 18.175

5,250 1,750 17,950 7,180 29,080 10,906

1,320,000 360,000 480,000 480,000 8,000 8,500 16,500 1,303,500 1,303,500

B, Loss due to spoiled work is charged to the specific job 1. Work in process Materials Payroll FO Applied 2. Spoiled Goods

5,250 1,750 1,750 16,200 7,200

1,320,000 360,000 480,000 480,000 8,000

Work in process

8,000

3. Finished goods Work in process

1,312000 1,312,000

Problem 8 – Kyralei Co. 1. RAGC is charged with the cost of defective units a. Work in process 176,000 Materials Payroll FO Applied (40,000 x 140%) b.

c. 2.

Work in process Materials Payroll FO Applied

80,000 40,000 56,000

23,200 4,000 8,000 11,200

Finished goods Work in process

199,200 199,200

Cost of correcting defective work in not charged to RAGC a. Work in process 180,000 Materials 80,000 Payroll 40,000 FO Applied (40,000 x 150%) 60,000 b.

FO Control Materials Payroll

24,000 4,000 8,000

Page 5 c.

Finished goods Work in process

Problem 9 – Little Mermaid 1. Charged to specific job a. Work in process Materials Payroll FO Applied b.

c.

Work in process Materials Payroll FO Applied Finished goods

180,000 180,000

75,000 25,000 20,000 30,000

(20,000 x 150%) 1,250

500 300 450 76,250

Work in process 2.

76,250

Charged to all production (FO rate should be 160% of direct labor cost) a. Work in process 77,000 Materials 25,000 Payroll 20,000 FO Applied (20,000 x 160^) 32,000 b.

c.

FO Control Materials Payroll FO Applied

1,280 500 300 480

(300 x 160%)

Finished goods Work in process

77,000 77,000

Problem 10 - Nicole Company 1. Cost to correct defective units charged to specific job a. Work in process 9,000 Materials Payroll FO Applied (20,000 x 150%) b.

Work in process Materials Payroll FO Applied

5,000 2,000 2,000

100 60 20 20

Page 6 c. 2.

Finished goods Work in process

Charged to all production a. Work in process Materials Payroll FO Applied (20,000 x 160^) b.

c.

FO Control Materials Payroll FO Applied

9,100 9,100 9,000 5,000 2,000 2,000 100 60 20 20

(300 x 160%)

Finished goods Work in process

9,000 9,000

Problem 11 – Marvin Corporation1. Work in process Materials Payroll FO Applied 2.

3. 4.

Work in process Materials Payroll FO Applied

117,000 100,000 83,000 4,350 1,650 1,500 1,200

Spoiled goods Work in process

825

Finished goods Work in process

303,525

Problem 12 – Alexis Company 1. Charged to specific job a. Work in process Materials Payroll FO Applied b.

300,000

Spoiled goods ( 600 x 50) Work in process

825 303,525

700,000 350,000 150,000 200,000 30,000 30,000

Page 7 c. 2.

Finished goods Work in process

670,000 670,000

Charged to all production a. Work in process (10,000 x 70) Materials Payroll FO Applied

700,000 350,000 150,000 200,000

b.

c.

Spoiled goods FO Control Work in process (600 x 70) Finished goods Work in process (9,400 x 70)

30,000 12,000 42,000 658,000 658,000

Problem 13 – Raindrops Company _____________________ EOQ = \/ 2 x 60,000 x 800 1,200 Problem 14 ____________________ EOQ = \/ 2 z 100,000 x 413 25.30 a. Investment costs Invoice price Excise tax ( 125.00 x 4%) Insurance on shipment Total

P 125.00 5.00 2.00 P 132.00

b. Carrying costs Cost of capital ( 132.00 x 15%) Inventory insurance Inventory tax ( 125.00 x 2%) Total

P 19.80 3.00 2.50 P 25.30

c. Ordering costs Shipping permit Processing costs Unloading Total

P 300.00 23.00 90,00 P 413.00

Page 8 Problem 15 - Candice Foundry Inc. 1. Spoiled units are due to internal failure a. Work in process Materials Payroll FO Applied b.

c. 2.

Spoiled goods ( 200 x 15.00) Factory overhead control Work in process ( 200 x 18.00) Finished goods Work in process

90,000 46,000 14,000 30,000 3,000 600 3,600 86,400

Spoiled units are due to customer’s specification a. Work in process 90,000

86,400

Materials Payroll FO Applied b. c.

46,000 14,000 30,000

Spoiled goods Work in process

3,000

Finished goods Work in process

87,000

TRUE/FALSE 1. True 2. False 3. False 4. True 5. True Multiple choice 1, a 2, b 3, d 4, a 5, c

6. 7. 8. 9. 10.

3,000 87,000

False False False False True

6. b 7. b 8. a 9. 700 at 5,400 10. b

11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15.

a a c c d

True False False False False 16. 17. 18. 19. 20.

d b b a b

CHAPTER 7 - ACCOUNTING FOR FACTORY OVERHEAD Problem 1 – Denmark Company FO rate = 216,000 216,000 90,000 72,000 units 240%of DMC P3.00/unit Problem 2 - Colossal Corporation FO rate = 207,000 207,000 500,000 52,100 units 41,40%of DMC

P3,97/unit

216,000 1,600 MHrs. P135/MHr.

P3.00/MHr

= 16,000 Hrs. x P4.50

3. Actual FO Less: Applied

216,000 48,000 DLHrs/

90% of DLC P4.50/DLHr.

207,000 207,000 69,000 MHrs. 85,000 DLHrs.

Problem 3 – Manila Company 1. FO rate = P67,500/15,000 DLHrs. 2. Applied FO

216,000 240,000

207,000 765,000

P2.44/DLHr. 27.06%ofDLC

=

P 4.50/DLHr.

=

P 72,000 P 69,000 72,000

Overapplied FO

( P 3,000)

Problem 4 - Ellery Corporation 1. Job 123 Direct labor cost 600 FO rate 180% Applied FO 1,080 2.

Job 123 DM 300 DL 600 FO 1,080 TOTAL 1,980

Job 124 1,080 940 1,692 3,712

Job 124 940 180% 1,692

Job 125 1,400 180% 2,520

Job 126 5,120 180% 9,216

Job 125 Job 126 TOTAL 720 4,200 6,300 1,400 5,120 8,060 2,520 9,216 14,508 4,640 18,536 28,868

Problem 5 – Rubi Company 1. FO rate

P 60,000 P 60,000

P 60,000 40,000 DLHrs.

100%of DLC

P 1.50/DLHr.

P60,000 25,000 MHrs.

`` P2.40/MHr.

Page 2 2. a) Factory overhead was based on direct labor cost JOB 101 JOB 102 JOB 103 JOB 104 DM 5,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 DL 7,200 10,000 11,000 9,000 FO APP/. 7,200 10,000 11,000 9,000 TOTAL 19,400 27,000 30,000 27,000

JOB 105 10,000 15,000 15,000 40,000

JOB 106 11,000 4,200 4,200 19,400

b). Factory overhead was based on direct labor hours JOB 101 JOB 102 JOB 103 JOB 104 DM 5,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 DL 7,200 10,000 11,000 9,000 FO APP. 7,500 9,000 9,750 8,400 TOTAL 19,700 26,000 28,750 26,400

JOB 105 10,000 15,000 15,750 40,750

JOB 106 11,000 4,200 4,500 19,700

c( Factory overhead was based o machine hours JOB 101 JOB 102 JOB 103 JOB 104 DM 5.000 7,000 8,000 9,000 DL 7,200 10,000 11,000 9,000 FO APP. 7,200 7,680 9,600 8,160 TOTAL 19,400 24,680 28,600 26,160

JOB 105 10,000 15,000 15,000 40,000

JOB 106 11,000 4,200 3.600 18,800

Problem 6 – Thermal Corporation 1. Direct method Direct cost Allocated cost S1 S2 Total Base FO rate

P1___ P 90,000

P2___ P 60,000

S1___ P 20,000

10,000 20,000 P120,000 50,000 MHrs. P 2.40/MHr.

10,000 12,000 P 82,000 20,000 DLHrs P 4.10/DLHr.

( 20,000)

S2___ P 32,000 ( 32.000)

2. Step method P1___ Direct cost P 90,000 Allocated cost S1 2,000 S2 30,000 Total P122,000 Base 50,000 MHrs. FO rate P 2.44/MHr 3. Algebraic method P1___ Direct cost P 90,000 Allocated S1 3.143 S2 28,572 Total P121,715 Base 50,000 MHrs. FO rate P 2.43/MHr.

P2___ P 60,000

S1____ P 20,000

S2___ P 32,000

( 20,000)

16,000 ( 48,000)

P2___ P 60,000

S1___ P 20,000

S2____ P 32,000

3,143 17,143 P80,286 20,000 DLHrs P 4.0/DLHr.

( 31,429) 11,429

25,143 ( 57,143)

2,000 18,000 P 80,000 20,000 DLHrs P 4.00/DLHr.

S1 -= 20,000 + 20% S2 S2 = 32,000 + 80% S1 S1 S1 - .16S1 S1 S2

= = = = =

20000 + 20%( 32,000 + 80% S1) 20,000 + 6,400 + .16 S1 26.400 26,400/.84 31,429

= 32,000 + 80% 31,429 = 32,000 + 25,143 = 57,143

Problem 7 – High Density Corporation 1. Direct method Insertion Assembly Direct cost 685,000 795,000 Allocated Bldg. occupancy 63,158 116,842 Accounting 100,227 144.773 Maintenance 132,955 192.045 Total 981,340 1,248,660

Occupancy Accounting Maintenance 180,000 245,000 325,000 (180,000) ( 245,000) ( 325,000)

2. Step method Direct cost Allocated cost Occupancy Accounting Maintenance Total

Insertion Assembly 685,000 795,000

Occupancy Accounting 180,000 245,000

55.728 94,480 147,365 982,573

( 180,000)

103,096 136,471 212,860 1,247,427

11,146 (256.146)

Maintenance 325,000 10,030 25,145 (360,175)

Problem 8 - Central Parkway Corp. Direct cost Allocated S1 S2 Total S1 S2 S1 S1 - .025 S1 S1 S2

P1___ 120,000

P2____ 80,000

13,333 8,333 141,666

6,667 6,667 93,334

S1___ 25,000 ( 26,667) 1,667

= =

25,000 + 10% of S2 10,000 + 25% of S1

= = = = =

25,000 + 10% ( 10,000 + .25S1 25,000 + 1,000 + .025S1 26,000 26,000/.975 26,667

= =

10,000 + .25(26,667) 16,667

Problem 9 – Megastar Company

S2___ 10,000 6,667 (16,667)

Fixed Variable

95,000 Mach. Hrs. Per Mach.Hr. 0.36 ( 34,200/95,000) 0.44 ( 41,800/95,000) 0.80

Total 34,200 41,800 76,000

1.

Actual factory overhead Less: Applied (100,000 x .80) Overapplied factory overhead

P 78,600 80,000 ( 1,400)

2.

Actual factory overhead Less: Budget allowed on actual hours Fixed 34,200 Variable (100,000 x .44) 44,000 Spending variance – unfavorable

P 78,600

Budged allowed on actual hours Less: Applied factory overhead Idge capacity variance favorable

P 78,200 80,000 ( 1,800)

3.

78,200 P 400

Page 5 Problem 10 - Abner Company

Fixed Variable Total

TotalP 33,840 302400 P336,200

72,000 units Per unit P 0.47 (33,840/72,000) 4.20 (72,000 x 4.20) P 4.67

1.

Actual FO Less: Applied FO 5,400 units x P 4.67 Underapplied FO

P 15,910 25,218 (P 9.308)

2.

Actual FO Less: Budget allowed on actual hours Fixed (33,840/12 months) Variable ( 5,400 x 4.20) Spending variance – favorable

P 15,910

3.

Budged allowed on actual hours Less: Applied Idle capacity variance – unfavorable

2,820 22,680 25,500 ( P 9,590) P25,500 25,218 P 282

Problem 11 - Norman Corporation 1. Variable rate/hour = 270,000 – 252,000 60,000 - 48,000 = P1.50/DLHr. 2. Total Less: Variable (60,000 x 1.50) (48,000 x 1.50) Fixed 2.

High 270,000

Low 252,000

90,000 _______ 180,000

72,000 180,000

Actual factor overhead Less: Applied ( 60,000 x 90%) x 5.25 Overapplied FO FO rate =

252,000 48,000

= 5.25/ DLHrs.

Page 6 3. Actual factory overhead Less: Budget allowed on actual hours Fixed Variable (54,000 x 1.50) Spending variance 4.

273,000 283,500 ( 10,500)

273,000 180,000 81,000

Budget allowed on actual hours Less: Applied Idle capacity variance

261,000 12,000 261,000 283,500 ( 22,500)

Problem 12 - Blanche Corporation 1.

Variable rate/ = 356 ,250 - 348,750 47,500 - 45.000

2. Total Less: Variable 45,000 x 3 47,500 x 3 Fixed

=

P3.00/DLHr.

90% capacity 348,750

95% capacity 356,250

135,000 _______ 213,750

142,500 213,750

3.

Actual factory overhead Less: Applied ( 42,500 DLHrs x 7.50) Underapplied factory overhead

445,000 318,750 126,250

Problem 13 - Bulilit Company 1) Direct materials (50 x P120) (100 x P120) Direct labor Factory overhead applied ( 100 x P25) (400 x P25) Total costs Divide by number of units Cost per unit

Product A P 6,000 2,000 2,500 ________ P 10,500 50__ P 210.00

Product B P 12,000 8,000 10,000 P 30,000 100_ P 300.00

Factory overhead rate = Est. Factory overhead Est. direct labor hours = P200,750/ 8,030 = P 25.00/ per direct labor hour Page 7 2) Direct materials Direct labor Factory overhead applied Mat. Handling ( 20 x ( 50 x Setup ( 5x ( 8x Design changes ( 2 x ( 5x No. of parts ( 10 x ( 15 x Total costs Divide by number of units Cost per unit

Product A P 6,000 2,000 P 50 ) P 50) P 200) P 200) P 107.50) P 107.50) P 100) P 100)

Factory overhead rate Mat. Handling P60,000/1,200 Setup P 80,000/ 400 Design changes P 10,750/ 100 No. of parts P 50,000/ 500

= = = =

Product B P 12,000 8,000

1,000 2,500 1,000 1,600 215 537.50 1,000 ________ P 11,215 50__ P 224.30

1,500 P 26,137.50 100___ P 261.38

P 50/ times handled P 200/setup P 107.50/change P 100/part

Problem 14 Job 101 Job 102 Job 103 P 100 ( 2 x P100) P 200 (4 x P100) P 400 400 ( 10 x P 20) 200 (30 x P20) 600 300 ( 10 x P 10) 100 ( 50 x P10) 500 500 ( 50 x P50) 2,500 ( 10 x P50) 500 P 1,300 P 3,000 P 2,000

Setup ( 1 x P 100) Inspections ( 20 x P 20) Mat. Moves ( 30 x P 10) Eng. Hours ( 10 x P 50) Total factory OH

Factory overhead rate Setup P 20,000/200 Inspections P 130,000/6,500 Mat. Moves P 80,000/8,000 Eng. Hrs. P 50,000/1,000

Page 8 TRUE/FALSE 1. True 2. False 3. True 4. True 5. True MULTIPLE CHOICE 1. c 6. 2. c 7. 3. d 8. 4. c 9. 5. 7,000 fav. 10. `

6. 7. 8. 9. 10. c c c c c

True True True False True

= = = =

P 100/setup P 20/inspection P 10/move P 50/hour

11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 11. a 12. 13. d 14. 137,500 hrs. 15. d

False False True True True 16. b 17. c 18 39,000 UA 19. a 20. c 21. b 22. a 23.

CHAPTER 8 - ACCOUNTING FOR LABOR

a

TRUE/FALSE 1. True 2. False 3. False 4. False 5. False

6. 7. 8. 9. 10.

False True True True True

Problem 1 - Evergreen Company A) 1. CHARGED TO THE JOB 2. CHARGED TO FACTORY OVERHEAD CONTROL

Direct materials Direct labor Factory overhead Overtime Total

CHARGED JOB 401 28,000 18,000 5,600 ______ 51,600

CHARGED TO FOC Other factory costs Overtime Total

TO JOB JOB 402 37,000 23,000 11,200 6,000 77,200 P 16,800 6,000 P 22,800

CHARGED JOB 401 28,000 18,000 7,600 ______ 53,600

TO FOC JOB 402 37,000 23,000 15,200 ______ 75,200

x 1/3 X 2/3

Problem 2 No. Regular OT Employee Hrs Rate Pay Hours Austria 42 36.00 1,512 2 Bautista 43 36.00 1,548 3 DeSantos 44 45.00 1,980 4 Motus 40 30.00 1,200 Reyes 40 30.00 1,200 TOTAL 7,440 b) 1. Payroll Accrued payroll 2. 3. Page 2

Rate 18.00 18.00 22.50 -

Overtime Premium 36.00 54.00 90.00 -__ 180.00

Total Pay 1,548 1,602 2,070 -___ 7,620 7,620 7,620

Accrued payroll Cash

7,620

Work in process (1,512 + 1,548 + 1,980) FOC (1,200 + 1,200 + 180 ) Payroll

5,040 2,580

7,620

7,620

Problem 3 - Norman Company Employee Guaranteed Wage Cruz 2,000 Briones 2,000 David 2,000 Mendoze 2,000 Rivera 2,000 Tolentino 2,000 TOTAL 12,000

Total pay – piece rate (240 x 7.50) (286 x 7.50) (275 x 7.50) (240 x 7.50) (225 x 7.50) (285 x 7.50)

Deficiency

1,800 2,145 2,062.50 1,800 1,687.50 2,137.50 11,632.50

2. Charged to Work in process 3. Charged to factory overhead account -

200 200 312,50 -___ 712.50

Total Payroll 2,000.00 2,145.00 2,062.50 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,137.50 12,345.00

11,632.50 712,50

Problem 4 - Ty-Nee Trailer Company Deductions were computed on the assumption that previous payment of wages were made without deductions and all deductions are made on the last payment for the month. Assume the following amount as previous wages (for the past 3 weeks) Castro 5,600 Ardina 7,500 Brioes 6,500 David 6,200 Fajardo 5,900 Tomas 5,800 Villas 5,200 Employee Castro Ardina Briones David Fajardo Tomas Villas TOTAL

Continuation Employee

REGU HRS. 42 45 48 48 45 42 40

Total

LAR RATE 40.00 50.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 40.00

PAY 1,680.00 2,250.00 1,920.00 1,920.00 1,800.00 1,680.00 1,600.00 12,850.00

SSS W/holding

OVER TIME HRS. RATE 2 20.00 5 25.00 8 20.00 8 20.00 5 20.00 2 20.00 -

Phil.

PAY 40.00 125.00 160.00 160.00 100.00 40.00 -__ 625.00

Pag- Total

TOTAL PAY 1,720.00 2,375.00 2,080.00 2,080.00 1,900.00 1,720.00 1,600.00 13,475.00

Net

Castro Ardina Briones David Fajardo Tomas Villas TOTAL

Pay Prem. 1,720.00 250.00 2,375.00 333.30 2,080.00 283.30 2,080.00 283.30 1,900.00 266.70 1,720.00 250.00 1,600.00 233.30 13,475.00 1899.90

Tax 681.28 614.53 840.93 865.33 603.38 461.38 438.28 4,505.11

Health 87.50 112.50 100.00 100.00 87.50 87.50 75.00 650.00

Castro Total pay (5,600 + 1,720) 7,320 ( 4,167) - 208.33 3,153 x 15% - 472,95 681.28 Ardina Total pay (7,500 + 2,375) 9,875 ( 7,167) 208.33 2,708 x 15% 406.20 614.53 Briones Total pay (6,500 + 2,080) 8,580 (7,917) 708.33 663 x 20% 132,60 840.93 David Total pay (6,200 + 2,080) 8,280 ( 7,500) 708.33 780 x 20% 156.00 864.33 Fajardo Total pay (5,900 +1,900) 7,800 ( 5,167) 208.33 2,633 x 15% 394.95 603.38 Tomas Total pay (5,800 + 1,720) 7,520 ( 5,833) 208.33 1,687 x 15% 253.05 461.38

Page 4

ibig 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 700.00

Deduct Pay 1,118.78 601.22 1,160.33 1214.67 1,324.23 755.77 1,348.63 731.37 1,057.58 842.42 898.88 821.12 846.58 753.42 7,755.01 5719.99

Villas Total pay (5,200 + 1,600)

2.

6,800 (5,267) 208.33 1,533) x 15% 229.95 438.28

Payroll W/holding tax payable SSS Premiums payable Phil Health Contributions payable Pag-ibig funds contributions payable Accrued payroll

13,475.00 4,505.11 1,899.90 650.00 700.00 5,719.99

Accrued payroll Cash

5,719.99 5,719.99

Work in process (12,850 – 1,680) Factory overhead control (1,680 + 625) Payroll MULTILE CHOICE 1. b 2. b 3. a 4. b. 5. a

6. 7. 8. 9. 10.

a d d a c

Entry for No 11 should be Work in process – Job 1010 Work in process – Job 1011 Factory overhead control (1,250 + 37) Payroll payable

11,170.00 2,305.00 13,475

11. none of the give 12. d 13. d 14. d 15. c 9,748 1,200 1,287 12,235

CHAPTER 9 – PROCESS COSTING Problem 1 a)

Units completed Units IP end

Actual 8,000 2,000 10,000

b)

Units completed Units IP end

21,000 4,000

Mat. & Conversion WD EP 100% 8,000 1/2 1,000 9,000 100% 3/4

21,000 3,000

25,000

24,000

c)

Units completed Units IP end

6,000 1,000 500 7,500

100% 3/4 2/5

6,000 750 200 6,950

d)

Units completed Units IP end

18,000 5,000 4,000 27,000

100% ½ ¾

18,000 2,500 3,000 23,500

e)

Units completed Units IP end

32,000 1,500 4,000 37,500

100% 1/5 ¾

32,000 300 3,000 35,300

Problem 2 - Casper Corporation 1) Units started 11,000 Units completed Units in process, end 2) Cost incurred Equivalent prod. Unit cost Problem 3 Case 1 Started Completed In process, end

9,000 2,000 11,000

100% ¾

Materials P 15,750 10,500 P 1.50

5,000 4,000 1,000 5,000

Labor P 40,950 10,500 P 3,90

9,000 1,500 10,500 Overhead P 25,200 10,500 P 2.40

Materials WD EP

Conversion WD EP

100% 100%

100% ¾

4,000 1,000 5,000

4,000 750 4,750

Case 2 Received

50,000

Completed In process end

44,000 6,000 50,000

Started

35,000

Completed

29,000

100% 44,000 44,000

100% 44,000 ¼ 1,500 45,500

100% 29,000

100% 29,000

Case 3

In process, end

3,000 3,000 35,000

75% 100%

2,250 3,000 34,250

1/3 1/2

1,000 1,500 31,500

10,500 750 11,250

100% 2/5

10,500 600 11,100

Page 2 Problem 4 - Beautiful Company Started 12,000 Completed In process end

10,500 1,500 12,000

Unit cost M = 72,000/11,250 = 6.40

100% 50%

L = 88,800/11,100 = 8

2. Completed & transferred ( 10,500 x 18.40) 3. In process, end Materials L & OH

( 750 x 6.40) ( 600 x 12)

OH = 44,400/11,100 = 4

193,200 4,800 7,200 12,000

Problem 5 - ABM Company

Started/received Completed IP, end

Department 1 Department 2 Materials Conversion Materials Conversion Actual EP EP Actual EP EP 60,000 40,000

40,000 40,000 40,000 30,000 30,000 30,009 20,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 8,000 60,000 60,000 55,000 40,000 35,000 38,000

Costs charged to the department Cost from preceding dept. Cost added in the dept. Materials 480,000 Labor 330,000 Overhead 220,000 Total costs added 1,030.000 Total costs 1,030,000

720,000 8.00 6.00 4.00 18.00 18.00

Total costs accounted for as follows: C & T (40,000 x 18) 720,000 IP end Cost from preceding dept. Materials ( 20,000 x 8) 160,000 Labor (15,000 x 6) 90,000

18.00

245,000 7.00 190,000 5.00 114,000 3.00 549,000 15.00 1,269,000 33.00 (30,000 x 33) (10,000 x 18) 180,000 ( 5,000 x 7) 35,000 ( 8,000 x 5) 40,000

990,000

Overhead (15,000 x 4) Total cost as accounted for

60,000

Problem 6 - Ten Ten Corporation Actual 1, Units started 100,000 Completed IP end

90,000 10,000 100,000

310,000 1,030,000

( 8,000 x 3)

24,000 279,000 1,269,000

Strawberry WD EP

Chocolate WD EP

Conversion WD EP

100% 90,000 100% 10,000 100,000

100% 90,000 100% 90,000 _____ 70% 7,000 90,000 97,000

2. Unit cost Strawberry = 180,000/100,000 = 1.80 Chocolate = 135,000/ 90,000 = 1.50 Conversion = 116,400/97,000 = 1,20 3. Completed & transferred (90,000 x 4.50) 4. In process, end Strawberry ( 10,000 x 1.80) Chocolate Conversion ( 7,000 x 1.20)

405,000 18.000 8,400 26,400

page 3 Problem 7 – Lenlen Corporation a) Lost units – discovered at the beginning Units received Units completed

80,000 60,000

100% 60,000

Units IP end Units lost

10,000 10,000 80,000

100% 10,000 -___ 70,000

Costs accounted for as follows: Cost from preceding dept. 560,000 Cost added in the department Materials 175,000 Labor 121,875 Overhead 243,750 Total cost added 540,625 Total costs 1,100,625 Cost accounted for as follows: Completed and trsnsferred ( 60,000 x 16.125) In process, end Cost from preceding dept. ( 10,000 x 8) 80,000 Materials ( 10,000 x 2.50) 25,000 Labor ( 5,000 x 1.875) 9,375

100% 60,000 50%

5,000 -___ 65,000

8.00 2.50 1.875 3.75 8,125 16.125 967,500

Overhead ( 5,000 x 3.75) Total costs as accounted for

18,750

133,125 1.100,625.

b) Normal – discovered at the end Units completed 60,000 100% 60.000 100% 60,000 Units IP end 10,000 100% 10,000 50% 5,000 Units lost 10,000 100% 10,000 100% 10,000 80,000 80,000 75,000 Costs charged to the department Cost from preceding dept. 560,000 7.00 Cost added in the dept. Materials 175,000 2.1875 Labor 121,875 1.625 Overhead 243,750 3.25__ Total costs added 540,625 7.0625 Total costs 1,100,625 14.0625 Total costs accounted for as follows: Comp. & gransf. ( 60,000 x 14.0625) + (10,000 x 14.0625) 984,375 IP end Cost from prec. Dept. ( 10,000 x 7) 70,000 Materials ( 10,000 x 2.1875) 21,875 Labor ( 5,000 x 1.625) 8,125 Overhead (5,000 x 3.25) 16,250 116,250 Total costs as accounted for 1,100,625 c) Abormal – discovered when 60% completed Units completed 60,000 100% 60,000 Unitx IP ed 10,000 100% 10,000 Units lost 10,000 100% 10,000 80.000 80,000 Costs charged to the department Cost from preceding dept. 560,000 Cost added in the dept. Materials 175,000 Labor 121,875 Overhead 243,750 Total added 540,625 Total costs 14.33714 Page 4 Total costs as accounted for Comp. & transf. ( 60,000 x 14.33714) FOC (10,000 x 7.00) + (10,000 x 2.1875) + (6,000 x 5.14964) IP, end Cost from prec. Dept ( 10,000 x 7.00) 70,000 Materials ( 10,000 x 2.1875) 21,875

100% 60,000 50% 5,000 60% 6,000 71,000 7.00 2.1875 1.71655 3.43309 7.33714 1,100,625

860,228 122,773

Labor ( 6,000 x 1.71655) Overhead ( 6,000 x 3.43309) Total cost as accounted for

8,583 17,166 117,624 1,100,625

d) Lost – abnormal discovered at the end Note - Equivalent production and unit costs the same as lost – Normal discovered at the end. The difference is only on the allocation of the cost. Completed & transferred ( 60,000 x 14.0625) Spoiled goods ( 10,000 x 12.00) FOC 10,000 ( 14.0625 – 12.00) IP end Cost from prec. (10,000 x 7) Materials ( 10,000 x 2.1875) Labor (5,000 x 1.625) Overhead (5,000 x 3.25) Total costs as accounted for

843,750 120,000 20,625 70,000 21.875 8,125 16,250

116,250 1,100,625

Problem 8 - Briones Company Units received 28,000 Units completed 16,000 Units IP end 10,000 Units lost – normal 800 Units lost – abnormal 1,200 28,000

100% 16,000 ______ 16,000

Cost charged to the department Cost from preceding department Cost added in the department Materials Conversion Total added Total costs to be accounted for Costs accounted for as follows: Completed & transf. (16,000 x 19) + (800 x 17.50) FOC ( 1,200 x 17.50) IP end Cost from preceding dept. ( 10,000 x 10) Materials Conversion (6,000 x 7.50) Total costs as accounted for Problem 9 - EDSA Corporation

100% 16,000 60% 6,000 100% 800 100% 1,200 24,000

280,000

10.00

24,000 180,000 204,000 484,000

1.50 7.50 9.00 19.00 318,000 21,000

100,000 45,000

145,000 484,000

Started/received Increase in units Completed IP, end Lost

60,000 ______ 60,000 36,000 36,000 9,000 9,000 15,000 _____ 60,000 45,000

36,000 3,000 _____ 39,000

Page 5 Cost charged to the department Cost from prec. Dept. Cost added in the dept. Materials 180,000 4.00 Labor 78,000 2.00 Overhead 15,600 0.40 Total added 273,600 6.40 Total costs 273,600 6.40 Costs accounted for as follows: Completed ( 36,000 x 6.40) 230,400 IP end Cost from prec. Dept. Mat. ( 9,000 x 4) 36,000 Labor (3,000 x 2) 6,000 OH ( 3,000 x 0.40) 1,200 43,200 273,600 Problem 10 Received 5,000 Completed 3,800 100% 3,800 IP end 800 40% 320 Lost 400 100% 400 5,000 4,520 Costs charged to the dept. Cost from prec. Dept 60,000 Cost added in the dept. Materials 22.600 Labor 17,440 Overhead 13,080 Total added 53,120 Total costs as accounted for 113,120 Costs accounted for as follows Completed ( 3.800 x 24) Spoiled goods ( 400 x 15) FOC 400 x (24 – 15) IP end Cost from prec. Dept. ( 800 x 12)

36,000 9,000 45,000 39,000 6,000 ______ 45,000

39,000 6,000 _____ 45,000

39,000 2,400 _____ 41,400

230,400

5.12

135,000 82,800 41,400 259,200 489,600

3.00 2.00 1.00 6.00 11.12

(30,000 x 11.12)

433,680

(6,000 x 5.12) 30,720 (6,000 x 3.00) 18,000 (2,400 x 2.00) 4,800 (2,400 x 1.00) 2,400 55,920 489,600 100% 20 100%

3,800 160 400 4,360

12.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 12.00 24,00 91,200 6,000 3,600 9,600

Mat. ( 320 x 5) 1,600 Labor ( 160 x 4) 640 Overhead ( 160 x 3) 480 12,320 Total costs as accounted for 113,120 Problem 11 - Diamond Company Units received 55,000 Increase in units 5,000 60,000 Units completed 48,000 100% 48,000 100% 48,000 Units IP end 12,000 100% 12,000 70% 8,400 60,000 60,000 56,400 Costs charged to the department Cost from prec. Dept. 24,750 0.4125 Cost added in the dept. Materials 7,200 0.12 Conversion cost 53,580 0,95 Total added 60,780 1.07 Total costs 85,530 1.4825 Total costs accounted for as follows: Completed ( 48,000 x 1.4825) 71,160 IP end Cost from prec. Dept. ( 12,000 x0.4125) 4,950 Materials (12,000 x 0.12) 1,440 Conversion cost ( 8,400 x 0.95) 7,980 14,370 85,530 Page 6 Multiple choice 1. C 11. D 21. D 2. C 12. D 22. B 3. B 13. B 23. B cost should 4. 48,500 14. 11,000 be 2,760,00 5. C 15. D 24. C 6. B 16. D 25. D 7. C 17. A 26. A 8. C 18. D 27. B 9. B 19. C 28. D 10. D 20. B

CHAPTER 10 - AVERAGE AND FIFO COSTING TRUE OR FALSE 1. TRUE 2. TRUE 3. TRUE

MULTIPLE CHOICE - THEORY 1. B 11. C 2. A 12. C 3. A 13. C

4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10.

FALSE TRUE TRUE FALSE TRUE TRUE TRUE

4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10.

B A C A A D A

14. 15.

C D

Problem 1 1) FIFO Units in process, beg. Units started

6,000 42,000 48,000 Units completed & transferred (40,000) IP beg. 6,000 80% 4,800 70% 4,200 Started & completed 34,000 100% 34,000 100% 34,000 Units in process, end 8,000 10% 800 15% 1,200 48,000 39,600 39,400 2) AVERAGE Units in process, beg. 6,000 Units started 42,000 48,000 Units completed Units IP end

40,000 100% 40,000 100% 40,000 8,000 10% 800 15% 1,200 48,000 40,800 41,200

Problem 2 1) FIFO Units in process, beg. Units started

5,000 35,000 40,000 Units completed & transferred (30,000) IP beg. 6,000 85% 5,100 75% 4,500 Started & completed 24,000 100% 24,000 100% 24,000 Units in process, end 10,000 20% 2,000 30% 3,000 40,000 31,100 31,500

PAGE 2 2) AVERAGE Units in process, beg. Units started

5,000 35,000 40,000

Units completed Units IP end

30,000 100% 10,000 20% 48,000

Problem 3 1) Units in process beg. Units started

30,000 100% 2,000 30% 32,000

30,000 3,000 33,000

300 2,000 2.300

Units comp. & transf. (1,700) IP beg. Started & completed Units in process, end

300 1,400 600 2,300

40% 100% 40%

120 70% 1,400 100% 240 20% 1,760

210 1,400 120 1,730

2) Unit cost -

540 Materials 3,714/1760 Conversion 2,258/1730 6,512

= =

2.110227 1.305202 3.415429

3) Cost of units transferred out From IP beg. Cost last month 540 Cost added Mat. ( 120 x 2.110227) 253 Conversion ( 210 x 1.305202) 274 From units started & completed (1,400 x 3.415429) 4) Cost of ending inventory Materials (240 x 2.110227) Conversion ( 120 x 1.305202)

1,067 4,782 5,849

507 156 663

Problem 4 1) FIFO Units in process, beg Units started

8,000 14,000 22,000

Units Completed ( 17,000) IP beg. 8,000 70% 5,600 70% 5,600 Started & completed 9,000 100% 9,000 100% 9,000 Units in process, end 5,000 80% 4,000 40% 2,000 22,000 18,600 16,600 Page 3

Unit cost

48,240 126,852/18,000 219,120/16,600 394,212

Materials Conversion

Completed & transf. IP beg. Cost labor month Cost added (5,600 x 20.02) Started & completed ( 9,000 x 20.02)

= 6.82 = 13.20 20.02

48,240 112,112

160,352 180,180

340,532

IP end Materials ( 4,000 x 6.82) Conversion ( 2,000 x 13.20) 2) AVERAGE Units completed Units IP end Unit cost

27,280 26,400

17,000 5,000 22,000

100% 17,000 100% 80% 4,000 40% 21,000

53,680 394,212 17,000 2,000 19,000

Materials

16,440 + 126,852 = 6.823428 21,000 Conversion = 31800 + 219,120 = 13.206316 19,000 20.029744

Completed & transferred ( 17,000 x 20.029744) IP end Materials ( 4,000 x 6.823428) Conversion (2000 x 13.206316)

340,506 27,294 26,412 53,706 394,212

Problem 5 – Auto Novelties, Inc. a. Average 1) Units in process beg. 15,000 Units started 250,000 265,000 Units completed & transf. 245,000 Units in process end 20,000 265,000 2) Unit cost

Materials Converion

100% 100%

245,000 20,000 265,000

210,000 + 3,500,000 265,000

100% 40%

= 14.00

60,000 + 1,458,000 = 6.00 253,000 20,00

245,000 8,000 253,000

Page 4 3) 4)

Completed & transf. (245000 x 20) IP ined Materials ( ( 20,000 x 14) Conversion ( 8000 x 6)

b) FIFO 1) Units completed ( 245,000) IP beg Started & completed 230,000 Units IP beg. 8,000

4,900,000 280,000 48,000

15,000 230,000 20,000

1/3 100% 230,000 100%

265,000 2)Unit cost:

Materials Conversion

3,500,000/250,000 1,458000/243,000

328,000 5,228,000 5,000 100%

20,000

40%

250,000 = =

243,000

14.00 6.00 20.00

3) Completed& transferred From IP beg. Cost last month 270,000 Cost added ( 5,000 x 6) 30,000 From started & completed ( 230,000 x 20) 4) IP end Materials ( 20,000 x 14) Conversion (8,000 x 6) 328,000

300,000 4,600,000

4,900,000

280,000 48,000 5,228,000

Problem 6 - Ellery Company A) AVERAGE 1) Units IP beg. Units started Units completed Units IP ed 2)

Unit cost

15,500 36,000 51,500 48,000 3,500 51,500

100% 100%

Materials 7,800 + 54,000 51,500

48,000 3,500 51,500 =

100% 45% 1.20

48,000 1,575 49,575

Conversion 20,150 + 79,000= 49,575 3)

Completed & transferred ( 48,000 x 3.20)

153,600

4) IP end Materials ( 3,500 x 1.20) Conversion ( 1,575) x 2.00)

Page 5 B) FIFO 1) Units IP beg Units started

Unit cost

4,200 3,150

7,350 160,950

15,500 36,000 51,500

Units completed (48,000) IP beg. Started & completed Units IP end 2)

2.00 3,20

15,500 32,500 100% 3,500 100% 51,500

IP beg. 27,950 Materials 54,000/36000 = Conversion 79,000/39,500 = 160,950

3) Completed & transferred IP beg. Cost last month Cost added ( 5,425 x 2) Started & completed ( 32,500 x 3.50)

Units completed

1.50 2.00 3.50

27,950 10,850 113,750

4) IP end Materials ( 3,500 x 1.50) Conversion ( 1,575 x 2) Problem 7 - GDL Company A) AVERAGE Units IP beg Units received

35% 5,425 32,500 100% 32,500 3,500 45% 1,575 36,000 39,500

152,550

5,250 3,150 8,400 160,950

10,000 40,000 50,000 35,000

100%

35,000

100%

35,000

Units IP end Units lost – normal

10,000 100% 5,000 50,000

10,000 50% ______ 45,000

5,000 ______ 40,000

Unit cost Cost from preceding dept. 40,000 + 140,000 = 4.00 50,000 – 5,000 Materials

20,000 + 70,000 45,000

= 2.00

Labor

39,000 + 162,500 40,000

= 5.0375

Overhead

42,000 + 130,000 40,000

= 4.30 _____ 15.3375

Page 6 Problem 7 – continuation Completed & transferred ( 35,000 x 15.3375)

536,812.50

IP end Cost from prec. Dept ( 10,000 x 4) Materials ( 10,000 x 2) Labor ( 5,000 x 5.0375) Overhead ( 5,000 x 4.30)

40,000.00 20,000.00 25,187.50 21,500.00 106,687.50

B)FIFO Units IP beg. Units received

10,000 40,000 50,000

Units completed ( 35,000) IP beg. 10,000 1/4 2.500 Started & completed 25,000 100% 25,000 100% 25,000 Units IP end 10,000 100% 10,000 1/2 5,000 Units lost 5,000 ______ ______ 50,000 35,000 32,500 Unit cost IP beg. From preceding dept. Materials Labor

141,000 140,000/40,000 – 5,000 = 70,000/35,000 = 2.00 162,500/32,500 =

4.00 5.00

Overhead

130,000/32,500 643,500 Completed & transferred *35000) IP beg Cost last month Cost added ( 2.500 x 9) Received & completed ( 25,000 x 15)

=

4.00 15.00

141,000 22,500 375,000 538,500

IP end Cost from preceding dept. ( 10,000 x 4) Materials (10,000 x 2) Labor ( 5,000 x 5) Overhead ( 5,000 x 4)

40,000 20,000 25,000 20,000 105,000

Page 8 - Janice Manufacturing Co. Units in process, beg. 2,000 Units received from preceding dept. 9,000 11,000 Units comp. & transf. 8,000 IP beg. 2,000 50% Received & completed 6,000 Units in process, end 3,000 1/3 11,000 Cost – IP beg. Cost from precedig dept. Cost added in the dept Materials Labor Overhead Total costs to be accounted from Costs accounted for as follows: Cost of units completed & transf.

10,250 36,000 4,000 8,000 6,000 18,000 64,250

1,000 100% 6,000 1,000 8,000 P 4.00 .50 1.00 .75 . 2,25 6.25

IP beg. 10,250 Cost added ( 1,000 x 2.25) 2,250 Cost & transf. (6,000 x 6.25)

12,500 37,500

50,000

IP end Cost from preceding (3,000 x 4.00) M, L, O ( 1,000 x 2.25) Total costs as accounted for

12,000 2,250 14,250 64,250

Problme 9 – Norman Corporation AVERAGE METHOD Units IP beg. Units started

1,000 9,000 10,000

Units completed & transferred Units IP end 750 Units lost – abnormal 100% 500

8,000 100% 8,000 100% 8,000 100% 8,000 1,500 100% 1,500 75% 1,125 50% 500 100% 10,000

500

100%

10,000

500 9,625

9,250 Cost to be accounted for Materials Labor Overhead

Cost IP beg 2,520 1,540 2,800 6,860

Cost added Unit cost 72,480 7.50 21,560 2.40 43,450 5.00 137,490 14.90

Page 3 Cost accounted for as following Completed & transferred ( 8,000 x 14.90) 119,200 Factory Overhead ( 500 x 14.90) 7,450 In process, end Materials (1,500 x 7.50) 11,250 Labor ( 1,125 x 2.40) 2,700 Overhead ( 750 x 5.00) 3,750 17,700 Total costs as accounted for 144,350 Problem 9 - Norman Corporation FIFO METHOD Units completed & transferred IP beg.

1,000

40%

400

65%

650 75%

750

Started & completed 7,000 Units IP end 750 Units lost – abnormal 100% 500

7,000

100%

7,000 100% 7,000 100%

1,500

100%

1,500

500 10,000

100% 9,400

75% 1,125

50%

500

500

100% 9,275

9,000 Cost to be accounted for Cost IP beg. Cost added Materials Labor Overhead

6,860 72,480 21,560 43,450 137,490 144,350

7.710638 2.324528 4.827778 14,862944 14,862944

Total costs to be accounted Costs accounted for as follows: Completed & transferred IP beg. Cost – last month 6,860 Cost added M ( 400 x 7.710638) 3,084 L ( 650 x 2.324528) 1,511 O ( 750 x 4.827778) 3,621 Started & comp.(7,000 x 14.862944) 104,041___ 119,117 Factory overhead control ( 500 x 14.862944) 7,432 In Process, end Materuaks ( 1,500 x 7.710638) 11,566 Labor ( 1,125 x 2.324528) 2,615 Overhead ( 750 x 4.827778) 3,620 17,801 144,350

Problem 10 1) Units IP beg Units received Units completed Units IP end

5,000 20,000 25,000 21,000 4,000

100% 21,000 ______

100% 21,000 30% 1,200

25,000 2)

Unit cost Transferred in

21,000

22,200

17,750 + 104,000 = 25,000 + 23,100 21,000

4.87

Materials

0

= 1.10

Conversion

7,250 + 38,400 = 2.056306 22,200 8.026306

3) Completed ( 21,000 x 8.026306 ) 168,552 4) IP end Prec. Dept. cost (4,000 x 4.87) 19,480 Materials Conversion ( 1,200 x 2.056306)

2,468

21,948 Problem 11 – Nofat Company Conversion 1) Units IP beg. 600 Units received 3,900 4,500 Units completed 4,100 4,100 Units IP end 400 120 4,500 4,220 2) Units cost From preceding department

Material A

100%

4,100

100%

400

Material B

100%

4,500 9,090 + 67,410 = 4,500 4,000 + 21,200 4,500

=

Material B

0 + 16,400 4,100

=

1,340

190%

_____

30%

4,100

Material A

Conversion

4,100

+ 17,650 = 4,220

17,00 5.60 4.00 4.50 ______ 31.10

3) Completed ( 4,500 x31.10) 139,950 4) IP end Cost from precede dept. ( 400 x 17.00) Material A ( 4.00 x 5.60) Conversion ( 120 x 4.50)

6,800 2,240 540 9,580

Page 10 Problem 12 Units started

10,500

Units completed Units IP end Buts kist - Boral

7,000 3,000 500 10,500

100%

7,000

Problem 13 - Alonzo Manufacturing Materials Cost – IP beg. P 6,544 Current cost 281,656 Total costs P288,200 Divided by equivalent prod. 262,000 Unit cost P 1.10 1.

Completed & transferred

2.

Total costs to be accounted for Less: Cost of units IP end Costs of units completed

100%

7,00

Conversion Total P 16,803 P 23,347 344,817 626,473 P 361,620 P649,820 258,300 P 1,40 P 2.50

( 255,200 x 2.50)

P 638,000 P 649,820 11,597 P 638,223

Problem 14 - Nicole Mfg. Co. 1) Units IP beg. 12,000 Units received 80,000 Increase in units 4,000 96,000 Units completed Units IP end

Costs – IP beg. 17,735

86,000 100% 10,000 100% 06,000 Transf. In P 11,800

86,000 100% 10,000 2/5 96,000

86,000 4,000 90,000

Materials Labor Overhead Total P 3,125 P 1,490 P 1,320 P

Current cost 186,145 Total costs P203,880 Divided by EP Unit cost 2.18

86,120 P 97,920

21,835 P 24,960

96,000 P 1.02

96,000 P 0.26

43,510 P45,000 90,000 P 0.50

34,680 P 36,000 90,000 P 0.40

P

2) Completed & transferred ( 86,000 x 2.18) 187,480 3)

P

IP end Cost from prec. Dept (10,000 x 1.02)

P

10,200 Materials ( 10,000 x 0.26) Labor ( 4,000 x 0.50)

2,600

Overhead ( 4,00 x 0.40)

1,600 P

2,000 16,400 Problem 15 1) Units received.

60,000

Units completed 50,000 100% 50,000 100% 50,000 Units IP beg. 9,000 100% 9,000 50% 4,500 Units lost – abnormal 1,000 ______ ______ 60,000 59,000 54,500 Cost from prec. Dept. 212,400 3.54 Materials 84,370 1.43 Coversion 129,710 2.38 426,480 7.35 2) Factory OH 3,540

( 1,000 x 3.54)

P

3) Completed & transf. (50,000 x 7.35) 367,500 4)

IP end Cost from prec. Dept ( 9,000 x 3.54) 31,860 Materials ( 9,000 x 1.43) Conversion ( 4,500 x 2.38)

55.440

12,870 10,710

Problem 16 – Bewitched Co. 1)

Cost per unit = 122,360/19000

=

6.44

Completed & transferred From IP beg. Cost last month Cost added ( 1,000 x 1.45) Received & completed ( 14,000 x 6.45) Unit cost Cost from preceding dept. M,L,O Units completed ( 19,000) From IP beg. From units received Units IP end 2)

30,610 1,450 90,300 122.360

110,000/22,000 30,450 /21,000

5.00 1.45

5,000 1/5 1,000 14,000 100% 14,000 8,000 ¾ 6,000 27,000 21,000

IP end Cost from preceding ( 8,000 x 5) M, L, O ( 6,000 x 1.45)

Problem 17 – Nicole Company Units IP beg. Units received

= = 6,45

40,000 8,700 48,700

1,400 14,000 15,400

Units Completed & transf. Units IP end Units lost – normal Units lost – abnormal

11,200 100% 11,200 100% 11,200 3,500 100% 3,500 40% 1,400 560 100% 560 100% 560 140 100% 140 100%

140 15,400 1) Completed & transf. ( 11,200 x 9) + (560 x 9) 105,840 2)

FOC

( 140 x 9)

15,430

13,300 P 1,250

3)

IP end Cost from prec dept. ( 3,500 x 5) 17,500 Materials ( 3,500 x 1) Conversion ( 1,400 x 3)

3,500 4,200

26,200 Problem 18 - Samahan Inc. 1) Units IP end ( 500 x 50% x 1.32)

P 33,000

2)

Finished goods, end ( 700 x 132)

P 92,400

3)

From FG beg. 600 uittz From units completed – IP beg. 1,250 “ From units received and completed 800 “

P 76,800 161,000

105600 Cost of goods sold

2,650

Or Total available for sale FG beg. 600 units Completed from IP beg. 1,250 Completed from started 1,500 x 132 Total goods available for sale 435,800 Less: FG Inventory Cost of goods sold

P 343,400

P 76,800 161,000 198,000 92,400 P 343,400

Computation of equivalent production Units IP beg. 1,250 Units started 2,000 3,250 Units completed (2,750) IP beg. 1,250 20% 250 Started & completed 1,500 100% 1,500 Units IP end 500 50% 250 3,250 2,000 Unit cost ( 264000/2000 = Completed & transferred IP beg. Cost last month 128,000

132.00

P

Cost added ( 250 x 132) Cost of IP beg. upon completion

33.000 P

161,000 Units started & completed ( 1,500 x 132)

P

198,000 Problem 19 - Michelle Company Department 1 Actual Materials Conversion Conversion Started or received 60,000 Comp. & transf. 40,000 IP end

Department 2 Actual Materials 45,000

45,000

45,000

45,000

40,000

40,000

15,000 60,000

15,000 60,000

9,000 54,000

5,000 45,000

5,000 45,000

4,000

44,000 Costs charged to the dept. Cost from preceding dept. Cost added in the dept. Materials 90,000 1,50 Labor 64,800 1.20 Overhead 59400 1.10 Total added 214,200 3.80 Total costs 214,200 3.80 Costs accounted for as follows Comp. & transf. ( 45,000 x 3.80) 171,000 354,000 IP beg Cost from prec dept Mat. ( 15,000 x 1.50) 22,500 Labor ( 9,000 x 1.20) 10,800 OH ( 9,000 x 1.10) 9,900 43,200 41,700 Total costs as accounted for 214,200 395,700 Journal entries 1. Materials Accounts payable 2.

Work in process – Dept. 1 Work in process – Dept. 2 Materials

171,000

3.80

112,500 2.50 61,600 1.40 50,600 1.15 224,700 5.05 395,700 8.85 (40,000 x 8.85) (5,000 x 3.80) 19,000 (5,000 x 2.50) 12,500 (4,000 x 1.40) 5,600 (4,000 x 1.15) 4,600

180,000 180,000 90,000 112,500 202,500

3.

Payroll Accrued payroll

125,600 125,600

4.

Work in process – Dept. 1 Work in process – Dept. 2 Factory OH Payroll

64,800 61,600 2,200 128,600

5.

Work in process – Dept. 1 Work in process – Dept. 2 Factory OH Applied

59,400 50,600 110,000

6.

Work in process – Dept. 2 171,000 Work in process – Dept. 1 171,000

7.

Finished goods 354,000 Work in process – Dept. 2 354,000

8.

Accounts receivable Sales

600,000 600000

Cost of goods sold 252,000 Finished goods 75,000 + (20,000 x 8.85)

252,000

Michelle Company Cost of Goods sold Statement For the month of June, 2008 Direct materials used Materials, June 1 Purchases Total available for use Less: Materials, June 30 Direct labor Factory overhead Total manufacturing costs Less: Work in process, June 30 Cost of goods manufactured 354,000 Finished goods, June 1 75,000 Total goods available for sale 429,000

P 50,000 180,000 230,000 27,500 P 202,500 126,400 110,000 438,900 84,900

Less: Finished goods, June 30 177,000 Cost of goods sold Multiple choice (problems) 1. A 11. B 2. A 12. C 3. D 13 A 4. C 14. C 5. A 15. C 6. A 16 B 7. A 17. A 8. C 18. A 9. D 19. A 10. C 20. A

21. A 22. D 23. C 24. D 25. B 26 A 27. B 28. B 29 C 30. B

P 2,52,000

31. C

CHAPTER 11 –JOINT PRODUCTS/BY-PRODUCTS TRUE/FALSE 1. T 2. F 3. F 4. T 5. T

6. T 7. T 8. F 9. T 10.T

Problem 1 – Owen Company 1. Market Value method Product Units Produced MVat SO JC A 20,000 4.00 B 32,000 1.75 C 36,000 3.00 75,600 D 24,000 2.75 46,200

11. T 12, F 13. T 14. T 15. F

Total MV Percentage 80,000 56,000 108,000

70%

56,000 39,200

66,000

310,000 217,000 2. Average Unit Cost Method Product Units Produced Average Unit Cost A 20,000 1.9375 B 32,000 C 36,000 D 24,000 3.Weighted average method

Share in

Share in JC 38,750 62,000 69,750 46,500 217,000

Product A B C D

Units Produced WF Total WF Cost/WF Share in JC 20,000 3.0 60,000 .3875 23,250 32,000 5.5 176,000 68,200 36,000 5.0 180,000 69,750 24,000 6.0 144,000 55,800 217,000

Problem 2 - Meadows Company a. Sales value at split-off method Product SV at SO Percentage A 88,000 60% B 77,000 C 55,000 b. Physical units method Product Units Produced A 13,200 B 8,800 C 4,400

Page 2 Problem 3 – Anchor Company 1. Market value method Product SV at SO Percentage A 420,000 60% 340,000 B 270,000 192,000 C 60,000 48,000

Share in JC 52,800 46,200 33,000 132,000

Average UC Share in JC 5.00 66,000 44,000 22,000 132,000

Share in JC Add’l Cost 252,000 88,000 162,000

30,000

36,000

12,000

450,000 580,000 2. Average unit cost method Product Units Produced Ave UC Share in JC Cost A 50,000 4.50 225,000 313.000 B 40,000 180,000 210,000 C 10,000 45,000 57,000

Total Cost

130,000 Add’l Cost 88,000 30,000 12,000

Total

450,000

130,000

580,000 Problem 4 – Laguna Chemical Company 1) a) - Revenue from by-product shown as additional sales Sales Main product 180,000 By-product 1,000 181,000 Less: Cost of goods sold Materials 30,000 Labor 17,400 Overhead 17,400 Cost of goods manufactured 64,800 Less: Inventory, end 6,480 58,320 Gross profit 122,680 Less: Selling and administrative expenses 54,000 Net Income 68,680 b)

Revenue from by-product shown as deduction from cost of goods sold of

MP Sales Main product Less: Cost of goods sold Materials Labor Overhead Cost of goods manufactured Less: Inventory, end Cost of goods sold Less: Revenue from by-product Gross profit Less: Selling and administrative expenses

180,000 30,000 17,400 17,400 64,800 6,480 58,320 1,000

57,320 122,680

54,000 Net Income

Page 3

68,680

c)

Revenue from by-product shown as other income Sales Main product 180,000 Less: Cost of goods sold Materials 30,000 Labor 17,400 Overhead 17,400 Cost of goods manufactured 64,800 Less: Inventory, end 6,480 Cost of goods sold 58,320 Gross profit 121,680 Less: Selling and administrative expenses 54,000 Net operating icome 67,680 Other income – Revenue from by-product 1,000 Net Income 68,680

2. Revenue from by-product shown as deduction from production cost of main product Sales Main product Less: Cost of goods sold Materials Labor Overhead Total mfg. cost/cofg manufactured Less: Rev. from by-product Net manufacturing cost Less: Inventory, end Cost of goods sold Gross profit Less: Selling and administrative expenses Net income Problem 5 – Fisher Company 1, By-product A Sales value P 6,000 Mfg. cost after separation ( 1,100) Marketing & adm. Exp. ( 750) Desired profit ( 900) Share in the joint cost 3,250

180,000 30,000 17,400 17,400 64,800 1,000 63,800 6,380 57,420 122,580 54,000 68,580

By-product B P 3,500 ( 900) ( 500) ( 420) 1,680

Total manufacturing cost before separation or joint cost Share of by-product A Share of by-product B

37,500 ( 3,250) ( 1,680)

Share of main product in the mfg. cost before separation

Page 4 2. Main Product Byproduct B Sales 75,000 Less: Cost of goods sold Share in joint cost 32,750 Cost after separation 11,500 44,250 2,580 Gross profit 30,750 Less: Marketing & Adm. Exp. 6,000 500 Net Income 24,750 420 Problem 6 - Eternity Company 1. Sales value – Z Further processing cost Marketing & adm. Exp. Desired profit Share of Z in the joint cost

32,570

By-product A 6,000

3,500

3,250 1,100 4,350

1,680 900

1,650

920 750 900

12,000 ( 4.000) ( 2,000) ( 2,000) 4,000

Hypothetical MV 2. Product Units Per Unit Total HMV Share in JC X 8,000 20-5 120,000 80,000 Y 10,000 25-7 180,000 120,000 300,000 200,000 Problem 7 – North Avenue Products Company 1. East Sales 17,500 Less: Cost of goods sold Share in Joint cost 6,480 Cost after split-off 3,000 3,000 Total mfg. cost 9,480 Less: Inventory end 1,580 7,900 10,960

Percentage 40% 60%

West 8,500

Total 26,000

3,600

10,080 -

3,600 540

13,080 3,060 2,120

Gross profit

9,600

5,440

15.040 Less: Selling & Adm. Exp.

3,500

1,700

Net income

6,1 00

3,740

5,200 9,840 2. Schedule allocating the joint cost to “East” and “West” Hypothetical MV Products Units Produced Per Unit Total Percentage Share in JC East 3,000 7.00 – 1,00 18,000 36% 6,480 West 2,000 5.00 10,000 3,600 28,000 10,080 Total joint cost Less: Net revenue of by-product Sales value 200 Less: Selling & adm. Exp ( 20) Net joint cost to be allocated

10,260.00 180.00 10,080.00

Page 5 Problem 8 Products X Y Z

Sales value at SO 138,900 69,100 42,000 250,000

Percentage 55.56%

Share in JC 100,000

27.64% 49,760 16.80% _30,240 100.00% 180,000

42000/250,000 = 16.80% x 180,000 100,000/180,000 = 55.56% x 250,000 = 138,900 100% - 55.56% - 16.80% = 27.64% Problem 9 - Magnolia Company 1) Joint cost allocated, if C is treated as a main product. Products Sales Value at FP Add’l cost HMV Percentage Share in JC A 250,000 25,000 225,000 B 175,000 20,000 155,000

C

12,200

Multiple choice – Theory 1. C 2. D 3. A 4. D 5. B

-

6. 7. 8. 9. 10.

Multiple choice – Problems 1. B. 2. D 3. C 4. D 5. DECREASE – 90,000 6. B 7. C 8. A 9. C. 10. B.

12,200 392.200

D B C A C 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20.

11. 12. 13. 14. 15. A B C B C D D D A B

C C A A B 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27.

D A C C C D C

CHAPTER 12 - STANDARD COSTING Problem 1 1. Actual price Std. price Difference X Act. Qty. MPV 3 Actual rate Std. rate Difference X Actual Hrs. Labor rate var.

P 2.52 ( 2.50) 0.02 4,450 89.00 U P 3.00 ( 3.10) ( 0.10) 3,150 ( 315) F

Problem 2 1. Actual price (9,540/3,600) 2.65 Std. price (2.75) Difference (0.10) X Actual quantity 3,600 MPV ( 360) F

2/. Actual qty. used 4.450 Std. qty. (4,050) Difference 400 x Std. price x 2.50 MQV 1.000 U 4. Actual hours 3,150 Std. hours ( 3,000) Difference 150 x Std. rate 3.10 LEV 465 U 2. Actual qty. used 3,200 Std. qty ( 1,500 x2)(3,000) Difference 200 x Std. price 2.75 MQV 550 U

2. Actual rate (5100/340) Std. rate Difference 5. Actual hrs. Std. hrs. Difference X Variable rate Variable efficiency

15.00 15.00 0

4. Actual hrs. 340 Std. hrs. (1,500 x .2) (300) Difference 40 X Std. rate 15.00 LEV 600 U

340 ( 300) 40 7.00 280 U

Problem 3 Fixed Variable Total

Total 5,000 7,500 12,500

5,000 DLHrs. Per DLHr 1.00 1.50 2.50

Std. hrs./unit = 5,000 DLHrs.. 4,000 units

Materials 1. Actual price P 1.02 2. Std. price ( 1,00) Difference .02 X actual qty. 7,200 MPV 144 U Labor 1. Actual rate (33,750/4,500) 7,50 2/ Std. rate ( 8.00) Difference ( 0.50) X actual hrs. 4,500 LRV (2,250) F Factory overhead 1. Actual overhead Less: Budget allowed on std. hrs. Fixed 5,000 Variable (4,375 x 1.50) 6,562.50 Controllable variance 2. Budget allowed on std hrs. Less: OH applied to production (4,3,75 x 2.50) Volume variance

= 1.25 Hrs./unit Actual qty. Std.(3,500 x 2) Difference x Std. price MQV

7,200 7,000 200 1.00 200 U

Actual hrs. 4,500 Std. hrs. (3,500 x 1.25) 4,375 Difference 125 x Std. rate 8.00 LEV 1.000 11.250.00 11,562.50 ( 312.50) 11,562.50 10,937.50 625.00

Problem 4 Fixed

Total 620,000

155,000 DLHrs. Per DLHr 4.00 (4 x 155,000)

Std. hrs./unit = 10.00/4

Variable 465,000 Total 1,085,000

3.00 7.00

(465,000/155,000)

1. Actual variable overhead Less: AH x Variable rate ( 148,000 x 3) Variable spending variance

= 2.5 Hrs.

475,000 444,000 31,000 U

AH x Variable rate Less: Std. hrs. x V rate ( 60,000 x 2.5 x 3) Variable efficiency variance

444,000 450,000 ( 6,000) F

2. Actual fixed overhead Less: Fixed overhead at normal capacity Fixed spending variance

632,500 620,000 12,500 U

Fixed overhead at normal capacity Less: Std. hrs. x fixed rate (150,000 x 4) Fixed volume variance 3. Actual factory overhead (475,000 + 632,500) Less: Budget allowed on std. hrs. Fixed 620,000 Variable ( 150,000 x 3) 450,000 Controllable variance Budget allowed on std. hrs Less: Std. hrs. x OH rate (150,000 x 7) Volume variance 4. Actual factory overhead Less: Budget allowed on actual hrs. Fixed Variable (148,000 x 3) Spending variance

620,000 600,000 20,000 U 1,107,500 1,070,000 37,500 U 1,070,000 1,050,000 20,000 U 1,107,500

620,000 444,000

1,064,000 43,500 U

Budget allowed on actual hrs. Less: Budget allowed on std. hrs. Efficiency variance

1,064,000 1,070,000 ( 6,000) F

Budget allowed on std. hrs. Less: Std. hrs. x FO rate (150,000 x 7) Volume variance

1,070,000 1,050,000 20,000 U

5. Spending variance Variable efficiency variance

43,500 U (

6,000) F

Actual hours Less: Standard hours Difference X Fixed overhead rate Fixed efficiency variance

148,000 150,000 ( 2,000) 4.00 ( 8,000) F

Budget allowed on actual hours Less: Actual hrs. x factory OH rate 148,000 x 7 Idle capacity variance

1,064,000 1,036,000 28,000 U

Problem 5 Additional information - Actual materials used – 1,200,000 pounds. Materials added 100% at the beginning Units completed 40,000 From in process, beg. 10,000 20% 2,000 From started 30,000 100% 30,000 100% 30,000 Units in process, end 20,000 100% 20,000 40% 8,000 Total 60,000 50,000 40,000

Materials Actual price Less: Std. price Difference X Actual mat. Purchased Mat. Price variance

1.20 1.00 0.20 2,000,000 400,000 U

Actual qty. used 1,200,000 Less: Std. qty. 1,000,000 Difference 200,000 x Std. price 1.00_ Mat. Usage variance 200,000 U

Labor Actual rate Less: Std. rate Difference X Actual hrs. Labor rate variance

14.00 15.00 ( 1.00) 60,000 ( 60,000)

Actual hours Less: Std. hours Difference x Std. rate Labor efficiency

Factory overhead Actual factory overhead ( 280,000 + 83,000) Less: Budget allowed on std. hrs. Fixed Variable (40,000 x 5) Controllable variance

60,000 40,000 20,000 15.00 300,000 363,000

80,000 200,000

280,000 123,000

-

Budget allowed on std. hrs. Less: Overhead applied (40,000 x 7) Volume variance Problem 6 Materials Actual price 1.05 Less: Std. price 1.00 Difference 0.05 X Actual qty. (63,525/1.05) 60,500 Mat. Price variance 3,025

280,000 280,000 -

Actual qty. used 60,500 Less: Std. qty. (5,000 x 12) 60,000 Difference 500 x Std. price 1.00 Mat. Qty. variance 500

Labor Actual rate Less: Std. price Difference X Actual hrs.(96,075/9.15) Labor rate variance

9.15 9.00 0.15 10.500 1,575

Actual hours Less: Std. hrs. (5,000 x 2) Difference x Std. rate Labor efficiency

144,000 DLHrs. Per Hour 2.00 2.50 4.50

Total Fixed 288,000 Variable 360,000 Total 648,000 Factory overhead Actual factory overhead (27,000 + 24,500) 51,500 Less: Budget allowed on std. hrs. Fixed (288,000/12) 24,000 Variable ( 10,000 x 2.50) 25,000 49,000 Controllable variance 2,500 B udget allowed on std. hours Less: Std. hrs. x std. rate (10,000 x 4.50) Volume variance 1.

2.

49,000 45,000 4,000

Materials ( 60,500 x 1.00) Material price variance Accounts payable

60,500 3,025

Work in process (5,000 x 12 x 1) Material quantity variance

60,000 500

63,525

10,500 10,000 500 9.00 4,500

Materials 3. 4.

5. 6. 7.

60,500

Payroll Accrued payroll

96,075

Work in process (5,000 x 2 x 9.00) Labor rate variance Labor efficiency variance Payroll

90,000 1,575 4,500

Factory Overhead Control Misc, Accounts

51,500

Work in process Factory overhead applied

45,000

Factory overhead applied Factory overhead - Controllable variance Factory overhead - Volume variance Factory overhead control

45,000 2,500 4,000

96,075

96,075 51,500 45,000

51,500

8.

Finished goods (5,000 x 39) Work in process

9.

Accounts receivable (4,500 x 100) Sales

450,000 450,000

10.

Cost of Goods sold ( 4,500 x 39) Finished goods

175,500 175,500

11.

Cost of goods sold 16,100 Material price variance 3,025 Material quantity variance 500 Labor rate variance 1,575 Labor efficiency variance 4,500 Factory overhead – controllable variance 2,500 Factory overhead – volume variance 4,000

Problem 7 1.

2.

Actual hours Less: Std. hrs. Difference X Variable rate Variable efficiency Actual variable overhead

195,000 195,000

101,000 101,300 (300) 3_ (900) 303,750

3.

Less: Variable spending variance Actual hrs. x variable rate Divide by variable rate Actual hrs.

750 303,000 3.00 101,000

Fixed overhead at normal capacity Les: Overhead applied to production Fixed volume variance

295,000 398,835_ ( 3,835)

Actual fixed overhead Less: Fixed spending Fixed overhead at normal capacity

299,950 4,950 295,000

Actual hours Less: Standard hours Difference X Standard rate Labor efficiency variance

11,120 10,000 1,120 3.75 4.200

Problem 8

Multiple choice 1. C 2. A 3. C 4. C 5. B 6. D 7. B 8. C 9. B 10. 12,000 Unf 11. B 12. B 13. D 14. C 15. C 16. C 17. D 18. C 19. D 20. D 21. B

22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30.

A D D B D 400 CREDIT D D NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION