VOL . VII, NO. 3 | 2015 ®
NORTH AMERICAN
PIPELINE C O N G R E S S
CHICAGO
pipelinecongress.com
Forging the road ahead September 22 & 23 | The Westin Chicago River North | Chicago, Illinois
BUILD STRATEGIC CONNECTIONS | DO BUSINESS | ACCESS UNGUARDED INSIGHTS | FIRST CLASS ACCESS | NOTABLE NETWORKING
The key to unlocking North America’s potential as a major energy exporter while securing a stable domestic supply lies within pipelines. North American Pipeline Congress provides an elite forum for influential players to engage in an open dialogue on the regulatory, political, infrastructural and technological demands impacting the road ahead. Join us at the crossroads of a new era. Register at pipelinecongress.com.
V O L . V I I , N O. 3
•
2015
14
D E PA R T M E N T S
2 | EXECUTIVE OUTLOOK Preparing for Greater Profitability
4 | GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE Industry Commentary from Around the World
6 | TECHNOLOGY FOCUS
Changing How We Think About Low Flow/Low Pressure
8 | SAFETY MATTERS
Safety Imagination, Chronic Unease, and Storytelling
10 | FUTURE THINKING
10
Increasing Regulation and Cost-Effective Compliance
22
12 | MARKET REPORT
Shale Success in a Low Price Environment
20 | TOUCHPOINTS
Pipeline Events, Papers and Conferences
14 | Corrosion: The Pervasive Menace
28 | BY THE NUMBERS
Four Steps to Battling Pipeline Integrity Threats
4 Battling Pipeline Integrity Threats steps to
BY THE NUMBERS
PIPELINE INTEGRITY: A COMPREHENSIVE VIEW
Pipeline operators face the continual challenge of delivering energy to the world in the safest and most economical ways. They battle aging infrastructure, weather economic pressures, adjust to increasing regulation, and engage communities to achieve social license. Fortunately, continual advances in pipeline threat detection, such as multiple dataset platforms, are supporting them every inch of the way. Follow steps 1-4 to see how.
22 | Containing Catastrophe
DETECT While running an MDS platform, mechanical (i.e., third-party) damage is detected by a number of onboard technologies.
2
provides a unique layer of damage information, providing full characterization of the threat.
MULTIPLE DATASET (MDS) PLATFORMS can LFM
XYZ MAPPING
Locates the anomaly relative to the centerline of the pipe.
DEFORMATION
Defines the anomaly as a dent.
DEF
LOW FIELD MAGNETIC FLUX LEAKAGE SMFL
MFL
HIGH RESOLUTION MAGNETIC FLUX LEAKAGE
Recognizes volumetric metal loss within the dent.
Identifies axially oriented metal loss or gouging within the dent.
REPORT When critically assessed by specialized software and data analysts, the
overlapping MDS data helps determine the exact characteristics and severity of the entire series of interacting threats – a re-rounded dent with gouging and crack-like features.
4
28 Metal loss, re-rounding, cycling, dent length and depth, strain and severity ranking.
PRIORITIZE/MITIGATE With the final integrity report delivered in close proximity to the inspection, the pipeline operator is able to: • Assess the pipeline’s most critical needs
• Minimize cost by avoiding unnecessary digs
• Prioritize maintenance/repair based on severity
• Ensure safe operation for its employees and the community
Innovations™ Magazine is a quarterly publication produced by T.D. Williamson.
Want to share your perspective on anything in our magazine? Send us an e-mail:
[email protected]
®Registered trademark of T.D. Williamson, Inc. in the United States and other countries. ™ Trademark of T.D. Williamson, Inc. in the United States and other countries. © Copyright 2015. All rights reserved by T.D. Williamson, Inc. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. Printed in the United States of America.
2015
T.D. Williamson North and South America +1 918 447 5000 Europe/Africa/Middle East +32 67 28 3611 Asia Pacific +65 6364 8520 Offshore Services +47 5144 3240 www.tdwilliamson.com
•
Jim Myers Morgan Waylon Summers A R T D I R E C T O R Joe Antonacci D E S I G N P R O D U C T I O N Kat Eaton, Mullerhaus.net D I G I TA L P R O D U C T I O N Jim Greenway, Ward Mankin P H O T O G R A P H Y Adam Murphy, CorrView I L L U S T R AT I O N Invisible Element EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
M A N AG I N G E D I T O R
V O L . V I I , N O. 3
SpirALL® MAGNETIC FLUX LEAKAGE
3
Identifies re-rounding (or rebounding) of the dent.
XYZ
•
Whether during pipe laying or for platform protection, advances in non-intrusive isolation technology are helping offshore operators reduce risk and mitigate incidents.
supply pipeline operators with a comprehensive view of their line integrity by providing a vehicle for an evolving combination of overlapping inspection technologies to be run on a single tool, at the same time. THE RESULT: robust threat detection and advanced characterization.
1
CHARACTERIZE Each technology on the MDS platform
I N N OVAT I O N S
As the rest of the world comes to grips with the unrelenting threat and growing cost of corrosion, the pipeline industry is already at the frontlines meeting the threat head-on.
1
EXECUTIVE OUTLOOK
Preparing for Greater Profitability CHAD FLETCHER
I N N OVAT I O N S
•
V O L . V I I , N O. 3
•
2015
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, GLOBAL SALES & SERVICE T.D. WILLIAMSON
2
When the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries
(OPEC) moved to preserve market share by maintaining their own production targets amid a worldwide supply glut, the strategy led to collapsing global oil prices, the idling of shale oil rigs in the United States, and cutbacks in capital budgets. But OPEC’s decision isn’t the only reason for the current slump. Structural factors, weak demand, and the strength of the United States dollar also played a role. Today, those issues continue to exert downward pressure on prices, as do geopolitical risks and events. With the world concerned about China’s economy, Middle East instability, and Russia-Ukraine relationships, it’s no wonder that the Energy Information Administration (EIA) predicts that price volatility is likely to persist throughout 2015. At the same time, however, energy production in the United States remains on the rise. In fact, the EIA notes that the quantity of shale or natural gas produced per rig has increased by more than 300 percent in less than five years. And that’s just one factor helping insulate the pipeline sector from instability. Because pipeline infrastructure isn’t fully developed in the areas where much of the new energy production is occurring, projects that were planned, approved, and funded before the price decline must continue to progress just to catch up with E&P activity. A considerable amount of this work involves reconfiguring existing pipelines rather than new construction. Pipeline operators are making some business adjustments. But those activities would probably occur regardless of energy prices. For example, over the past several years, I’ve seen more fine-tuning of activities that lead to operational and capital efficiency. In addition, there’s been more effort to prepare for and respond to increased regulatory scrutiny, such as Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration’s (PHMSA) Integrity Verification Process (IVP). By working with service providers who have field-seasoned expertise and a broad base of technologies, operators can further boost efficiency, better understand the condition of their pipeline systems, and promote even greater safety and supply reliability. All of which create a framework for greater profitability when energy prices rise again.
By working with service providers … operators can further boost efficiency, better understand the condition of their pipeline systems, and promote even greater safety and supply reliability.
I N N OVAT I O N S • V O L . V I I , N O. 3 • 2015
3
GlobalPerspective TRENDS IN OFFSHORE TECHNOLOGY
JAMES DRUMMOND
I N N OVAT I O N S
•
V O L . V I I , N O. 3
•
2015
VP GLOBAL OPERATIONS - LLOYD’S REGISTER ENERGY, ASSET INTEGRITY SERVICES
4
Reserves are being explored in ever-deeper waters and remote locations where development requires the oil and gas industry to push the boundaries of existing technologies. Last year, Lloyd’s Register Energy published a comprehensive industry report – Oil And Gas Technology Radar 2014 – which examined the state of technology innovation within the industry, including the motivators and barriers to implementation. Cost, not technological capabilities, was identified as the greatest barrier. “The [international oil companies] have great difficulty replacing their hydrocarbon reserves, which drives them to go into the most challenging and expensive environments,” says Duco De Haan, CEO of Lloyd’s Register Drilling Integrity Services. “As a result, costs have exploded in the last four to five years.” Nonetheless, technical innovation continues to be a central focus for subsea pipeline owners as they explore operations at unprecedented new ocean depths. To support asset integrity management programs, the industry is exploring the use of autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) – which are docked and recharged subsurface – to perform routine visual inspections, free span pipe monitoring, and cathodic protection surveys that detect corrosion. In some cases, AUVs could replace current remotely operated vehicles (ROVs) and their support vessels, potentially reducing cost and improving integrity management practices and maintenance activities. Advancements in data analytics are also playing an increasingly important role in the integrity management of pipelines. They are giving operators better visibility of the operating health of subsea pumps and the fluids produced in subsea processing facilities, as well as helping to monitor the condition of the pipeline – including the use of leak detection systems. Pipelines, too, are undergoing a technological evolution with the emergence and application of thermoplastic composite pipes. Both the polymers and fibre materials are composed of typical industry materials. The fibre, which provides the strength within the composite, is comprised of materials such as glass or graphite fibres and KEVLAR®. Another exciting emerging technology is “additive manufacturing” for fabrication of subsea equipment. Since deepwater processing facilities require thick-walled vessels to contain pressure, equipment such as gravity-based separators have become large and difficult to transport when fabricated using solid steel plate. But just as additive manufacturing offers an opportunity to customize materials, these variations from solid materials can compromise the structural integrity of an asset in ways that would be new to the industry. Clearly, a deeper understanding of the benefits and barriers to adoption is required. Innovative new technologies continue to be developed as the easily accessible fields are depleted. These new technologies bring improvements, but many also bring new limitations, which require engineers to revisit accepted risk management Lloyd’s Register Energy’s “Oil and Gas Technology Radar" techniques, develop appropriate standards, procedures and report is available at: www.lr.org/technologyradar methodologies, and apply their experience in new ways.
KEVLAR® is a registered trademark of E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company and/or its affiliates. Map & globe art by freevectormaps.com
Industry Commentary from Around the World
OVERCOMING TOMORROW’S INDUSTRY CHALLENGES TODAY
Arve Johan Kalleklev
REGIONAL MANAGER, SOUTH EAST ASIA, DNV GL – OIL & GAS
I N N OVAT I O N S
In the face of falling oil prices, it is no surprise that confidence in the outlook for the global oil and gas industry has taken a hit. More surprising though was how quickly sentiment changed in a short space of time; the confidence of over 360 senior industry professionals and executives dropped from 65 percent in October 2014 to just 28 percent in January 2015. The findings come from DNV GL’s report, A Balancing Act: The Outlook For The Oil And Gas Industry In 2015. The pessimistic outlook was also reflected in capital expenditure (CAPEX) intentions, with those planning to increase CAPEX in the same time period dropping from 40 percent to 12 percent. While investment in technology and innovation will remain a priority for many oil and gas firms in 2015, a significant proportion will struggle to maintain last year’s spending levels. Almost half (45 percent) expect investment in R&D to stay the same during 2015, while the number of those planning to cut R&D investment has more than tripled since last year (up from 11 percent to 37 percent). To adjust to this lower-margin environment, industry players need to develop a long-term sustainable cost base. This can be done by taking a broader view, reducing complexity and standardising processes, materials and documentation. We need to work together, and industry standards and guidelines must adapt to industry needs and the advance of new technologies. As an independent technical partner and adviser, DNV GL - Oil & Gas works with the industry to address these issues. The company has 5,500 oil and gas specialists and 22 laboratories and R&D centres around the world and this year we have initiated over 60 new joint industry projects (JIPs). Several of these address challenges the pipeline industry faces around the world. One such example is a JIP run from DNV GL’s laboratories in Singapore and Columbus, Ohio. Eight participants have so far joined forces with us to develop a method to evaluate fractures and cracks using a Single Edge Notched Tensile (SENT) test designed for sour service environments. Sour gas puts significant demand on pipeline material, particularly in deeper water. It is evident in various oil and gas producing regions of the world, in particular, the Middle East and the Commonwealth of Independent States. The JIP will enable the development of a guideline which is likely to develop into a Recommended Practice to Download a complimentary copy of A Balancing Act: The Outlook For help provide significant technical, logistical and financial The Oil And Gas Industry In 2015: www.dnvgl.com/balancingact savings to the industry.
• V O L . V I I , N O. 3 • 2015
ROVs at work on a subsea pipeline.
5
TECHNOLOGY FOCUS
Turning Impossible into Piggable New 6-inch, low drag inspection tool changes how operators think about assessing low flow, low pressure lines
Every day, there’s another example of technology making the impossible possible. But making the difficult-to-pig easier-to-inspect? That’s an entirely new triumph. For natural gas operators, inspecting geometry and wall-loss in small diameter gathering lines, especially in low flow, low pressure environments, has been a challenge. So much so, in fact, that many operators have their minds made up: it just can’t be done. Now, however, there’s a new 6-inch inspection tool that overcomes problems of size, flow, and pressure in these difficult pipelines. Not only does it gather data for integrity assessments, it might just change how operators view the possibility of pigging.
I N N OVAT I O N S
•
V O L . V I I , N O. 3
•
2015
Avoiding Turbulence
6
An inline tool moves when pressure differentials around it are greater than the friction produced by the tool itself. In the case of inspection tools used to survey geometry and measure metal loss, progress through pipelines is generally slow and steady. Accurate data is captured at regular points along the line, creating a successful integrity assessment. But during the inspection of small diameter, low flow, low pressure pipelines, certain magnetic flux leakage (MFL) tool components – such as urethane cups and brushes – make contact with the pipe’s interior. This can create significant drag, which is additional frictional pressure within the line. And drag can make an inline inspection (ILI) tool’s ride turbulent, impairing its performance in compressible products such as natural gas. For one thing, drag can cause speed excursions, where the tool accelerates abruptly and lurches ahead before returning to its normal pace. Unless it stops completely. A standstill could last 10 seconds or 10 hours – sometimes even longer – and might eventually require an intrusive intervention like having to cut out the MFL tool or launch a foam pig from behind to push it along. Drag-related speed excursions, which can be greatly exaggerated in low pressure and low flow natural gas pipelines, prevent the ILI tool from capturing data at every point – keeping operators from getting
a full picture of the pipeline’s condition and, in many cases, convincing them that these lines can’t even be inspected.
An Inspection Breakthrough For Difficult-To-Pig Lines T.D. Williamson (TDW) recognized the challenge of controlling drag to improve wall thickness inspections in a small diameter, low flow, low pressure environment. And, in response, the company developed a 6-inch low drag deformation and MFL inspection tool that, according to TDW integrity expert Lloyd Pirtle, not only “removes or minimizes” speed excursions, but makes it possible to inspect lines long thought of as too difficult to pig. “This tool and capability creates confidence,” Pirtle says. “Operators can now collect geometry and metal loss data to know what kind of shape their system is in – even with low flow or low pressure – while these critical pipelines remain in service. “For operators with similar obstacles who’ve thought their lines weren’t piggable, what we’re saying is, ‘here’s a tool that can make it piggable,’” he adds. The new 6-inch tool not only overcomes the design compromises that restricted navigability and wall thickness inspection in conventional smalldiameter MFL tools, it also includes geometry inspection on the same platform for improved threat assessment versus stand-alone MFL.
Successful Field Testing Following extensive internal validation using multiple 6-inch tool configurations, the low drag tool was field-tested* in partnership with Access Midstream, a natural gas service provider and subsidiary of energy company Williams. The tool was run seven times on pipelines in Texas’s Barnett Shale, at pressures around 10.34 bar (150 psi). According to Chuck Harris, Manager, Strategic Commercialization at TDW, although some speed excursions occurred with the low drag tool, they weren’t on the magnitude of those experienced with traditional inspection tools. The tool gathered acceptable inline inspection data at pressures as low as 8.27 bar (120 psi). “The technology cannot overcome line conditions completely,” Harris says. “What’s important is the fact that it can run in pipelines even at such low pressures.” In other words, the new low drag tool essentially opens previously difficult-to-inspect pipelines to easier, more accurate assessment. Which can also open operators’ minds to the possibility of pigging.
DEF2+MFL4 Drag Results Drag reduction vs MFL in 0.188-inch Wall Thickness (WT)
MFL: traditional stand-alone metal loss inspection
59%
Drag reduction vs DEF+MFL in 0.188-inch WT
61%
Drag reduction vs MFL in 0.388-inch WT
68%
Drag reduction vs DEF+MFL in 0.388-inch WT
DEF+MFL: traditional geometry combined with metal loss inspection DEF2+MFL4: newly designed geometry combined with metal loss inspection Drive: drive body only
V O L . V I I , N O. 3
55%
•
Drag comparison was performed between multiple 6-inch configurations:
I N N OVAT I O N S
DRAG TESTING
Its advantages include: • Greater wall thickness capability • Reduced drag • Improved navigability • Improved protection of the magnetizer
• 2015
*Download the white paper from Access Midstream and TDW to learn more: www.tdw-lflp.com
7
S A F E T Y M AT T E R S
It Can Happen Here Dr. Jan Hayes on safety imagination, chronic unease, and storytelling
Everyone has heard some variation of the classic “safety hero” narrative: Someone – a technician or an engineer, or an especially observant passerby – notices something suspicious. A warning light. An odd sound or strange smell. Data that doesn’t add up. Acting on instinct, a feeling that something just doesn’t feel “right,” they report what they’ve noticed – and in doing so, they prevent a catastrophic accident. There’s a reason stories like this are so popular. Everyone loves to cheer when a hero saves the day and prevents a massive and costly disaster. But according to Dr. Jan Hayes, associate professor at the School of Property, Construction & Project Management at RMIT University in Melbourne, Australia, these stories aren’t the only ones worth telling. Not every blinking light means a system failure, after all. And not every strange sound or unusual smell means a disaster is on the horizon. But what about the people who report those non-disasters? They still deserve recognition. They’re still heroes. In her recent book, titled “Nightmare Pipeline Failures: Fantasy Planning, Black Swans and Integrity Management,” co-authored with Professor Andrew Hopkins, Hayes examines several well-known pipeline disasters. While the specifics vary from incident to incident, there’s one common thread running through each case: Somebody noticed something. And in every case, that “something” was explained away as minor and unworthy of immediate attention. This tendency to look for alternate – and less dire – explanations isn’t an indication of laziness or inexperience. And it’s not unusual, either. Hayes says it’s a psychological S A F E T Y IM AG IN AT IO N:
I N N OVAT I O N S
•
V O L . V I I , N O. 3
•
2015
Cultivating Safety Imagination
8
Because most operators have never experienced a disaster, they can’t imagine a disaster actually happening.
• V O L . V I I , N O. 3 • 2015
Some of the research on which this article draws was funded by the Energy Pipelines Cooperative Research Centre, supported through the Australian Government’s Cooperative Research Centres Program. The cash and in-kind support from the Australian Pipeline Industry Association Research and Standards Committee is gratefully acknowledged.
I N N OVAT I O N S
process that happens so far below the surface that operators aren’t even conscious of it. The real culprit, she explains, is a lack of “safety imagination”: Because most operators have never experienced a disaster, they can’t imagine a disaster actually happening. Look at almost any major oil spill or gas leak, Hayes says, and you’ll see the same pattern: There was evidence, but nobody really believed it. Hayes recalls experiencing a similar sense of disbelief during her early career as a process engineer with a major oil and gas company: She was shocked when the North Sea Piper Alpha oil platform accident claimed the lives of more than 160 people. “I just didn’t think things like “We also need to hear that could happen,” she says. “It’s easy to have the mindset of, ‘It can’t about the guy who happen here because I’ve never seen thought there was a it happen here’ – but there’s always the potential. Safety imagination is Dr. Jan Hayes problem and reported about knowing in the back of your mind that things can go wrong.” it, and it turned out that But how do you encourage everything was fine.” employees to develop – and use – their safety imagination when it comes to pipeline integrity? How do you convince them to report anything that seems suspicious, even if they’re fairly certain organizations are accomplishing this by creating it’s nothing major? specialized safety workshops aimed directly It’s a challenge, Hayes says. But with the right at groups like executives and board members. cultural shifts, it’s not impossible. Others enact bonus systems that tie financial rewards to process safety. The most important The Benefits of “Chronic Unease” thing to do, though, is to create a culture where Some safety experts and researchers use the term everyone feels empowered to speak up when they “chronic unease” to describe the ideal approach notice something unusual – even if it turns out to to safety. It’s the opposite of the “it can’t happen be nothing. here” mindset; an outlook that remains aware that “We always hear about the guy who noticed something could go wrong at any time. Chronic something and reported it, and if it wasn’t for him unease means having specific, customized plans in there would have been a huge disaster,” Hayes place for each type of accident; it means thinking says. “That’s all well and good, but we also need proactively about public safety rather than to hear about the guy who thought there was a focusing solely on compliance. problem and reported it, and it turned out that It also means encouraging people at all everything was fine. That guy should still be levels of a company – from junior engineers congratulated – because it’s not about whether he to maintenance people to C-level executives prevented a catastrophe. It’s about the fact that we – to think critically about safety. Some need those reports to be made.”
9
FUTURE THINKING
MORE STRINGENT SAFETY REGULATIONS
COULD BE ON HORIZON FOR U.S. TRANSMISSION PIPELINES
I N N OVAT I O N S
•
V O L . V I I , N O. 3
•
2015
Safe, cost-effective compliance is within reach
10
Federal regulators in the United States appear to be honing in more than ever on bolstering natural gas transmission line safety. And while everyone wants to be safer, achieving and maintaining full regulatory compliance can be quite a challenge – and a costly one at that. For more than a year, natural gas transmission operators have been deciding how to address the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration’s (PHMSA) pending Integrity Verification Process (IVP) regulation. The new regulation would require operators to verify the records they use to establish and support the maximum allowable operating pressure (MAOP) of pipelines in high and moderate consequence areas. Now, operators are digesting the 28 transmission line safety recommendations that the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) made in late January of this year – including one that would require all natural gas transmission pipelines to be configured to accommodate inline inspection (ILI) tools. The proposed NTSB requirement specifically refers to the use of “smart pigs”, which are used to record information about the mechanical condition of pipe material. For a number of transmission line operators, the proposed ILI
Stavropoulos said PG&E would be working to “explore and leverage innovation in developing new inline inspection technologies to inspect pipelines previously considered ‘uninspectable’ with commercially available tools.”
COST-SAVING OPTIONS Whether operators wait to see if the NTSB’s recommendations become regulation or they opt to take a more proactive approach, they should know that modifying transmission lines is achievable – and it’s far less complicated and costly than many believe. The most desirable modification method is one that is safe and does not require line shutdown or interruption to flow. This can be achieved with proven hot tapping and plugging (HT&P) processes, which allows operators to isolate and bypass short lengths of pipe while modifications or tie-ins are made. Today, operators can employ HT&P methods like a double block and bleed isolation with the STOPPLE® Train isolation system, developed by T.D. Williamson (TDW). In conjunction with a bypass, the system allows lines to be modified for inspection safely and cost-effectively without the loss of revenue associated with line shutdowns. A recent case study calculates the difference between an operator’s line-replacement costs for a project that includes a pipeline shutdown and completing the same project with a standard HT&P process – along with the costs of using the STOPPLE Train isolation system. The results, which show significant savings with the HT&P process – and even greater savings with the STOPPLE Train system – are shown below: CONTINUED ON PAGE 27
I N N OVAT I O N S
requirement would be a tall order: While the use of sophisticated ILI tools is considered a highly effective method of detecting corrosion, weld defects, and other risks to pipeline integrity, the process simply isn’t an option for some transmission pipelines. Acute angles, varying inside diameter and incompatible pipeline pressure make these pipelines unfriendly territory and significantly raise the risk of lodging or damaging costly ILI tools as they are propelled by product flow. The prospect of making these ILI-unfriendly transmission lines “piggable” has been a frequent topic of discussion among American Gas Association (AGA) members this year, says Andrew Lu, the AGA’s Managing Director for Operations and Engineering. Many operators worry that if the NTSB’s pipeline safety recommendations result in new regulations, they could be looking at significant costs during a season of low oil prices. Exacerbating those concerns is the risk of revenue loss that comes with downtime, as operators complete the modifications necessary to make their pipelines compliant. “There are a lot of conversations going on,” Lu says. “Operators are asking, ‘What are the smart practices for doing this? How do we know where to start?’” That’s not to say there hasn’t been activity in this area. Some operators are doing more than talking about the changes on the horizon. A handful of companies are already taking steps to get ahead of the regulatory curve. In a March press release, Pacific Gas & Electric Co. (PG&E) welcomed the NTSB’s 28 safety recommendations for the gas pipeline industry – including the call for more inline inspections. Executive Vice President of Gas Operations Nick
•
SHUT DOWN
STANDARD ISOL ATION
STOPPLE®TRAIN ISOL ATION
—
—
Internal Costs
51%
38%
38%
–
16%
16%
34%
32%
23%
18%
23%
Isolation Service Provider Cost Job Site Charges
2015
15%
•
Lost Opportunity Due To No Flow
V O L . V I I , N O. 3
OPERATOR'S LINE REPLACEMENT COSTS
Operator Savings over shutdown:
11
MARKET REPORT
Local Sourcing in the Eagle Ford Play-specific services model supports profitability in low price environment
Despite the current low price environment, many of the industry’s major players remain committed to the Eagle Ford long-game, including Anadarko, BP, Koch, Marathon, and Shell, to name a few. To ensure stable profitability these operators are learning to increase efficiencies while lowering their operating costs. But until recently, this could be a problem, particularly when it came to completing repairs or maintenance within tight time constraints. Over the last two years, though, operators have adopted a play-specific pipeline services supply model that provides near-instant access to maintenance, supplies, and repairs. This shift is helping keep costs down and product flowing in the massive – but isolated – play.
I N N OVAT I O N S
•
V O L . V I I , N O. 3
•
2015
Waiting Doesn’t Pay
12
When Doug Hurst, a veteran oil and gas manager, joined T.D. Williamson (TDW) in the Eagle Ford in 2013, he spent several months driving back and forth getting to know local operators. He put 93,000 kilometers (58,000 miles) on his brand-new Jeep, but the mileage was worth it. Hurst learned a lot about the issues facing operators, and about why it was difficult for them to predict their service and supply needs. Some of what Hurst learned was surprising: It wasn’t unusual for a simple pipeline maintenance or repair issue to slow – or even temporarily shut down – production. Operators would sometimes wait days or weeks for help or product to arrive from a major service or supply hub outside of the play, or even outside of the region. “Operators can’t afford that kind of downtime,” says Hurst. “Your throughput is your cash register. If oil isn’t flowing because you’re waiting for a part or a technician, you’re not getting paid.” Hurst, who has helped develop a newly opened San Antonio service center for TDW, has spent the last 18 months working closely with operators to determine which types of equipment and service schedules best meet their needs, and creating service agreements that guarantee availability. The result has been a collaborative partnership that gives operators access to personalized supplies and services – when they need them.
Business as Usual
stories like this are becoming increasingly common: Early in 2015, a gas transmission line running from the Eagle Ford to Mexico became obstructed, dramatically affecting the flow to thousands of customers. It was a weekend, and it could have been a challenge getting a crew of qualified technicians
“Your throughput is your cash register. If oil isn’t flowing because you’re waiting for a part or a technician, you’re not getting paid.”
V O L . V I I , N O. 3 • 2015
Shale play operators share this common goal: to guarantee the health and safety of employees and the communities they work in. To meet this goal, operators rely on the highest quality products and services to assist them in reducing environmental impact and mitigating the risk of leaks and ethane emissions. The local pipeline services supply model helps fulfill this goal.
•
on a plane fast enough to prevent a serious service disruption. But under this new local supply model, a team from the region was out to the site within a few hours. At one time, this would have been fairly unusual. Today, though, operator access to same-day service and critical supplies is just business as usual. Whether in the Eagle Ford, Marcellus, or Bakken, local sourcing helps operators ensure long-term profit and stability.
I N N OVAT I O N S
As any operator in the Eagle Ford knows, pipeline service and supply needs are often dictated by play-specific issues. And one of the area’s most problematic issues is paraffin. Paraffin buildup clogs lines, reduces throughput, and increases compression costs. It can also trap water and encourage buildup of dangerous hydrogen sulfide. The battle against paraffin buildup can be costly and timeconsuming – and it can be a source of frequent emergency (or “popup”) supply needs. Hurst recalls one Eagle Ford operator who was especially concerned about sourcing an aggressive cleaning tool, the PitBoss™ Cleaning Pig. With plenty of notice, it wasn’t hard to get these 8-inch mandrel pigs shipped in from another location, but for a pop-up situation, there wasn’t time to wait several days for a replacement. The operator reached out to Hurst. Due to the ongoing dialogue and service agreements between the service center and local operators, Hurst had anticipated the need – and TDW had the appropriate safety stock level. “It’s all part of being partners and problemsolvers,” Hurst says. By listening to operators and monitoring what products they need – and how often they need them – local service centers are able to ease one of the most common pain points for Eagle Ford operators: Wait time. “We operate as a storefront in the Eagle Ford,” Hurst says. “Rather than waiting days or weeks, operators can stop by the warehouse and pick up what they need on the way to a jobsite.” As the service landscape in the play is changing,
13
14
I N N OVAT I O N S
•
V O L . V I I , N O. 3
•
2015
The United States Department of Defense is locked in battle against a ‘pervasive menace.’ But this time, the enemy isn’t terrorism, despots, or nuclear proliferation. Instead, it’s corrosion. The U.S. Pentagon spends about US$22.5 billion per year defending American military assets and infrastructure against corrosion. Which makes the label “pervasive menace” understandable, if not even a little mild. But as hefty as that GLOBAL PRICE TAG FOR CORRODING multibillion-dollar figure INFRASTRUCTURE is, it represents just a drop in the old, rusty bucket compared to the global price tag: at US$2.2 trillion, the annual cost of corrosion around the globe amounts to between 3 and 4 percent of the GDP of the world’s industrialized countries. That’s according to the World Corrosion Organization, which keeps tabs on such things. The financial impact of metal corrosion in Europe alone exceeds US$1.4 trillion a year. And as Dr. Roger King, Ph.D., reminds pipeline operators, about 40 percent of pipeline failures result from corrosion, although not all of those failures result in incidents. In other words, there’s a lot of stuff breaking down right now, a lot of deterioration that needs to be identified and fixed before a failure or catastrophe occurs. In some cases, of course, it’s already too late. And the media is increasingly tuned to such events. Which means the public is, too.
COVER STORY
As the public becomes increasingly aware of the problems associated with corrosion, they’re demanding more information about the condition of the world’s pipelines. Operators are acting now, using detection and control best practices to help people be – and feel – safe.
US$2.2 TRILLION
I N N OVAT I O N S • V O L . V I I , N O. 3 • 2015
15
The Insidious Enemy Within In a recent article called “Rust Never Sleeps,” which appeared in the March 2015 issue of The Atlantic magazine, writer Tim Heffernan ticks off a list of devastating and deadly incidents resulting directly from “seemingly mundane” corrosion: the rupture of a high-pressure natural gas pipeline near the American city of Charleston, West Virginia, in 2012 that melted 800 feet of interstate highway; the deaths of five
he claims, we still rely on “massive, interwoven, mechanical” infrastructure. That “big stuff,” he says, is rusting. The fact that a piece about corrosion would make a publication like The Atlantic, aimed at a general, albeit well-educated, audience, suggests that concerns about it are no longer exclusively the province of scientists, engineers, and infrastructure operators. And it’s no accident that the ravages of corrosion are rippling into mainstream consciousness.
I N N OVAT I O N S
•
V O L . V I I , N O. 3
•
2015
Out From Underground, And Into The Mainstream
16
One of the groups working to increase awareness is the New York-based World Corrosion Organization (WCO), whose mission is to “facilitate global implementation of best practices in corrosion protection for public welfare.” Since 2010, WCO has sponsored Corrosion Awareness Day. This year’s event was April 24. According to WCO Director General, George Hay, Corrosion Awareness Day is a “means to people in Malta when their lifeboat fell from the educate the public, industries and government agencies of the deleterious effects of corrosion on side of a cruise ship during a safety drill; a series our infrastructures worldwide.” of sewer explosions in Guadalajara, Mexico, As Hay noted in a statement, “The worldwide in 1992 that killed 252; and the 1971 crash of cost of corrosion is currently in the same order of British European Airways Flight 706, which magnitude as the cost to produce and distribute took 63 lives. food worldwide. The difference is that the public For the uninitiated reader, those are pretty frightening tales. For those who deal daily with the is somewhat aware of issues related to hunger and the cost of food, but totally unaware of the cost of risks of corrosion, they’re the stuff of nightmares. corrosion today and its effect on sustainability of Although Heffernan’s larger point – that the fight against “the insidious enemy within,” is being our infrastructures in the future.” lost – is directed specifically at the United States, it’s the same story all over the world. Even in the digital age,
• 2015
It’s likely that all of this increased attention around corrosion issues will lead to greater public scrutiny of the oil and gas pipeline industry.
V O L . V I I , N O. 3
Exposés and news articles aside, if anything is likely to boost public attention to corrosion, it will be Jonathan Waldman’s new book, Rust: The Longest War.
As A Best Practice, Monitoring Beats Inspection
•
Corrosion, Chapter-By-Chapter, Mile-By-Mile
I N N OVAT I O N S
Journalist Waldman’s journey into what the dust jacket describes as “a thrilling In the United States, however, more people grasped drama of man versus nature” those concerns after the TV news show “60 Minutes” takes him from corporate aired a story, in November 2014, called “Falling hallways to hardware stores, Apart: America’s Neglected Infrastructure.” It from a tropical Florida film set highlighted the nation’s outdated roads, airports and to the subzero Arctic. That’s rails, its 70,000 structurally-deficient bridges – 15 where he starts to follow, nearly mile-by-mile, the percent of them “at risk of catastrophic, corrosiontrek of a smart pig (inline inspection tool) through related failure,” according to NACE International, the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System (TAPS). The 54the technical society for corrosion professionals – page chapter called Pigging the Pipe recounts initial and the lack of funding to take care of any of it. failures, subsequent successes, and the retrieval of But one part of the story was missing, NACE data that uncovers nearly 1,000 anomalies, some International said in a public response issued three-quarters of them corrosion-related. shortly after the broadcast. And that was a key Waldman’s prose is matched by his humor – he solution to infrastructure woes: corrosion control. refers to a conventional pig as a “red urethane The organization argued that “what’s forgotten pig of lesser intelligence” and explains how wax is that corrosion-control technology and effective can render “smart pigs senseless, leaving them management practices can extend the life of blind, dumb, and amnesiac.” He’s also got a keen bridges and other infrastructure well beyond way of bringing the concept of pigging down to original design life.” human scale and layman terms. While it’s unlikely NACE International is working with local, that terms like coupons, magnetic flux leakage, state, and federal governments on policies to slacklines, and MAOP will roll off the tongues “eliminate the devastating effects of corrosion and of casual readers, at least they’ll have a basic strengthen public safety.” understanding of what all that means. It’s possible that some of that work took place According to Waldman, TAPS was at first at the organization’s Corrosion 2015 conference in called rustproof. Unfortunately, its principal Dallas, Texas, in March. The five-day gathering, protection was a painted coating that proved which drew some 7,000 attendees, was covered vulnerable within a number of years. The antiwith wide-eyed wonder by The Dallas Morning corrosion system was eventually fortified with News. Reporter Marc Ramirez seemed especially enthralled by an electrode rotator that mimics fluid buried magnesium anodes (“mag bags”), cathodic protection, and 800 monitoring coupons. But flow to test the efficacy of offshore coatings. The Waldman notes that it’s due largely to the work of device had been filled with what Ramirez referred inline inspection (ILI) tools finding faults before to as ‘sparkly items’ to demonstrate its whirlpool they could become failures that TAPS hasn’t effect. It looked, the reporter said, like “a blender suffered a corrosion-induced leak since it began pureeing the remains of a Mardi Gras float.” operating in 1977.
COVER STORY
‘A Blender Pureeing The Remains Of A Mardi Gras Float’
17
2015 • V O L . V I I , N O. 3 • I N N OVAT I O N S
18
Rust author Waldman is all in favor of it. As he writes, “Opposing the construction of new pipelines is silly … Pipelines are the safest way to deliver oil. Demanding that we know the condition that pipelines are in, on the other hand, is not silly.” Keeping pipelines in top condition is an industrywide activity, of course. But delineating best practices from a global perspective means talking to people like Dr. Liane Smith, FREng, and Richard Norsworthy. They were among a group of experts asked by global pipeline services provider T.D. Williamson to share their opinions about what works best when it comes to detecting and protecting against corrosion. Materials and corrosion expert Liane Smith is a Fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineers. That means she’s achieved the United Kingdom’s top honor recognizing engineering researchers, innovators, and leaders. The managing director of asset integrity company WG INTETECH, Chester, Dr. Liane Smith England, Smith earned a
Ph.D. in laser welding from Sheffield University and is the author of 94 technical papers and one book. Although she wasn’t referring specifically to TAPS’s 800 monitored coupons, Smith says that in a contest between corrosion monitoring and inline inspection, she’d put her money on the latter. Literally. “Monitoring gets you almost nowhere,” she says. “It’s not even worth installing. I’d put all of my investment into inspection.” The problem, Smith explains, is that monitoring is tied to specific locations. Weight loss coupons, for example, are effective at providing real time readings, but just for certain points on the pipeline. And because the flow regime around a coupon might differ from the rest of the pipeline, the information can’t be generalized beyond the coupon itself. Even worse is the fact that corrosion coupons are notorious for producing ‘false positives.’ “There’ve been countless times when we’ve seen negligible corrosion on a coupon, when actually there’s a lot of corrosion in the pipe,” she says. Inline inspection can overcome those deficiencies, Smith says, providing a highly accurate picture of the condition of the line along its whole length. She advocates starting an inline inspection regimen soon after the pipeline is put in service to capture baseline data that will be useful in later comparisons. Through multiple inspections, operators can identify trends, improve inspection scheduling, and know with greater precision the time to failure. And what about lines that aren’t considered piggable – or aren’t “fully inspectable,” as Smith prefers to call them? Smith says that bi-directional inline inspection tools can at least provide information about certain sections of the pipe. By coupling that data with corrosion modeling of the whole line, she explains,
No Such Thing As Unpiggable
Disbonding is the loss of adhesion between metal and cathodic coatings that allows water, bacteria, and other corrosion instigators to creep in between the disbonded coating and the pipe. In addition, some disbonded coatings prevent cathodic protection currents from protecting the pipe. As Norsworthy explains, electromagnetic acoustic transducer (EMAT) technology can locate areas where coatings have separated from metal. Once identified, they can often be remediated with mesh-backed tapes or other coatings that will allow cathodic protection to work, should disbondment occur again. But although repair is possible, selecting the proper coating for the environment, followed by rigorous inspection to ensure the coating has properly adhered in the first place – especially on girth welds, “where most corrosion takes place today” – is a far smarter strategy, Norsworthy says.
I N N OVAT I O N S
When it comes to unpiggable lines, Norsworthy’s view might be even more extreme than Smith’s. “Most lines are piggable, with very few exceptions,” the NACE International corrosion and cathodic protection (CP) specialist and instructor says flatly. “It just takes time, money, and effort. But it always pays off.” And right now is the best time for operators to take the time and effort to inspect their lines, Norsworthy says. “In a low-price environment, when there Bringing Corrosion Out Of Hiding aren’t as many new projects, operators have the Is a population that thinks of rust as something opportunity to find new issues before they become occurring mainly on old cars and paint can more serious,” he explains. “They can correct lids ready to learn that their military considers corrosion issues, do rehabilitation work, apply new corrosion a significant threat? Can they cope with external coatings.” the notion of rotting bridges? What about the idea In Norsworthy’s view, it’s those external coatings that the vast network of pipelines under their feet that are “the first line of defense” against corrosion. could be vulnerable, too? But that first line isn’t always impenetrable, The fact is, whether people are ready or not, says the 30-year industry veteran, who is widely corrosion is becoming less of a secret. Which gives acknowledged as a leader in his field. the oil and gas industry an opportunity to get in “Several pipeline companies now list disbonded on the conversation, letting the public know all CP shielding coatings as their number one root that’s being done to help keep them safe from this cause of external corrosion,” Norsworthy says. “pervasive menace.”
COVER STORY
the operator will have “some calibration around areas that can’t be inspected, gaining clarity for business critical decisions.” It would be best, Smith feels, if pipelines were designed with inline inspection in mind. “The costs of doing things right at the start are far less than the hassles that could come later,” she says.
• V O L . V I I , N O. 3 • 2015
19
TouchPoints TDW Events, Papers & Conferences
Offshor 21-22 OCT Oil Sands 15-16 SEPTEMBER | Fort McMurray, AB | Canada
SGA Operating Conference & Exhibits 20-22 JULY | Nashville, TN | USA LGA Pipeline Safety Conference 20-24 JULY | New Orleans, LA | USA
Aging Pipelines Conference 5-9 OCTOBER | Ostend | Belgium
MEA Gas Operations Technical & Leadership Summit 11-13 AUGUST | Rochester, MN | USA FEPA Summer Symposium 12-13 AUGUST | Palm Coast, FL | USA The Pipeline & Energy Expo 25-26 AUGUST | Tulsa, OK | USA NACE Central Area Conference 31 AUGUST - 2 SEPTEMBER | St. Louis, MO | USA Arkansas Gas Association 20-22 SEPTEMBER | Hot Springs, AR | USA
Rio Pipeline 22-24 SEPTEMBER | Rio de Janeiro | Brazil
North American Pipelines Congress 22-23 SEPTEMBER | Chicago, IL | USA DUG Eagle Ford 25-27 OCTOBER | San Antonio, TX | USA
J U LY 2 0 1 5
ASNT Annual Conference 26-29 OCTOBER | Salt Lake City | USA 2015
20-22 SGA Operating Conference & Exhibits Nashville, TN, USA
V O L . V I I , N O. 3
•
20-24 LGA Pipeline Safety Conference New Orleans, LA, USA
AUGUST 2015 11-13 MEA Gas Operations Technical & Leadership Summit Rochester, MN, USA
I N N OVAT I O N S
•
12-13 FEPA Summer Symposium Palm Coast, FL, USA
20
25-26 The Pipeline & Energy Expo Tulsa, OK, USA
Indicates TDW will speak or facilitate at this event.
Indicates TDW will present a white paper at this event.
TDW experts deliver — providing technical presentations and hands-on demonstrations throughout the world. To learn more:
[email protected].
North American Pipleline Congress (NAPC) CHICAGO, IL | Sept 22-23, 2015
e Technology Days TOBER | Stavanger | Norway Road Expo 12-15 OCTOBER | Moscow | Russia
The Road Ahead: North America’s Pipeline Future Abdel Zellou, Ph.D. – T.D. Williamson This opening executive panel explores industry advancements and challenges in 2015. Panelists will provide a market overview and examine what is impacting the infrastructure deficit, while providing insights into key questions. New Infrastructure: Planned Project Developments Mike Kirkwood, Ph.D. – T.D. Williamson Panelists will explore what is required from the industry to reach the forecasted project developments. The session will examine upcoming project developments in the midstream sector, including regional challenges impacting proposed builds.
OPT Asia 21-22 OCTOBER | Kuala Lumpur | Malaysia
Australian Pipelines and Gas Association Convention 17-20 OCTOBER | Gold Coast, QLD | Australia
O C TO B E R 2 0 1 5
31 AUG - 2 SEPT NACE Central Area Conference St. Louis, MO, USA
5-9
15-16 Oil Sands Fort McMurray, AB, Canada
Aging Pipelines Conference Ostend, Belgium
12-15 Road Expo Moscow, Russia
21-22 Offshore Technology Days Stavanger, Norway
22-24 Rio Pipeline Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
21-22 OPT Asia Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
26-29 ASNT Annual Conference Salt Lake City, UT, USA
2015
25-27 DUG Eagle Ford San Antonio, TX, USA
•
22-23 North American Pipeline Congress Chicago, IL, USA
V O L . V I I , N O. 3
17-20 Australian Pipelines and Gas Association Convention Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
•
20-22 Arkansas Gas Association Hot Springs, AR, USA
I N N OVAT I O N S
SEPTEMBER 2015
21
Containing Catastrophe
I N N OVAT I O N S
•
V O L . V I I , N O. 3
•
2015
NON-INTRUSIVE ISOLATION TECHNOLOGIES MITIGATE OFFSHORE INCIDENTS
22
• Isolating High Risk Construction
• Pipe-Laying Protection
• Preventive Measures
• End of the Wet Buckle
• Evolving Use for Non-Intrusive Inline Isolations
• Reducing the Inevitable
F E AT U R E S T O RY
On a Sunday night in the North Sea, workers aboard the Brent Alpha platform started a new workweek off on the wrong foot. Their Monday morning would begin a few hours early – with an evacuation. A crane had malfunctioned, and the large container it carried had been dropped into the North Sea, instead of being safely winched onto a support vessel. The container sliced through the water heading toward a vulnerable subsea pipeline. If impacted by the container, the pipeline could rupture. And a rupture would be a complete disaster: Not only would product spill into the sea, but a flashback of flammable oil or gas into the platform could cause danger to personnel and equipment, and gas clouds could form causing vessel-sinking bubbles. Fortunately, the workweek didn’t begin with a dangerous pipeline rupture. But 54 workers were evacuated from the Alpha platform, and both the Alpha and Bravo facilities were depressurized while the
I N N OVAT I O N S • V O L . V I I , N O. 3 • 2015
23
container was recovered by a support vessel. The incident was labeled a “near miss,” so the only real consequences were financial. Although cost and reputation are certainly important to offshore operators, a dropped object incident could have been much worse, even fatal. While subsea pipelines face a host of threats – corrosion, natural disasters, and anchor drag – some of the biggest risks come from planned operations. These might include laying new pipelines, raising platforms, or construction efforts like tying in new wells. For this reason, many operators – including the one mentioned – now go beyond standard safety training and regulatory compliance to invest in advanced risk mitigation technologies, such as non-intrusive inline isolation systems, to protect their assets.
I N N OVAT I O N S
•
V O L . V I I , N O. 3
•
2015
Isolating High Risk Construction
24
Dropped objects in offshore operations rarely make the news, but low probability impact accidents like the above-described are actually one of the biggest risks to offshore pipelines, accounting for the most severe potential consequences. During construction and platform maintenance, construction vessels will often come alongside the platform, potentially dropping or dragging anchor onto or near pipelines, and hoisting equipment that could potentially fall into the ocean. Although offshore operators already implement many safety and risk mitigation procedures to identify and avoid the pipelines in their operational area, due to the extreme severity of a dropped object impact, they take extra precautions during these events. As with any construction near a pipeline, the absolute safest approach would be to bleed down or decommission all pipelines in the dropped object zone until the work is complete. But as it can take several months before some offshore platform interventions are complete, and bleeding down a pipeline is an extremely costly proposition for the operator – not to mention a major disruption for downstream customers – work must
often take place while the lines are active. For example, in 2009, a gas processing platform offshore Myanmar required a new pipeline connection to retrieve gas from a neighboring field. The platform would not be in production during the tie-in operation, but the operator needed to keep its large gas export line live, in temporary “shut-in” condition, to avoid full decommission. This was critical to the operator as the export line, which runs 370 kilometers (230 miles) to shore and then onshore to the border of Thailand, delivers up to 20 percent of Thailand’s energy. Following the new tie-in, swiftly resuming flow was essential. Beginning from the existing platform, the pipe lay vessel proceeded to lay the new line. To protect and isolate the existing export line during the pipelaying activity, the operator used a double block and monitor solution, the DNV-approved SmartPlug® isolation tool. This isolation would ensure that if the export pipeline was damaged during tie-in, it would be safely isolated to prevent product loss or gas flashback. The SmartPlug tool, developed by T.D. Williamson (TDW), was pigged from the platform into positon, set, and remotely monitored to safely isolate the area surrounding the platform during the entire operation. Once complete, the tool was unset and pigged back to the receiver.
Preventive Measures While double block and monitor inline isolation has become the industry’s standard method for non-intrusive isolation, utilized in all regions of the globe to protect against the consequences of dropped objects, it is also relied on for risk reduction during general offshore maintenance work. In 2009, Australia experienced one of its worst oil spill disasters when an incident on an offshore drilling rig in the Timor Sea resulted in 150 kilometers (93 miles) of polluted ocean and evacuation of all personnel. The incident was caused by the cracking of a sub-surface concrete
Evolving Use for Non-Intrusive Inline Isolations
Pipe-Laying Protection
V O L . V I I , N O. 3 •
occasional propulsion system malfunction, or the inadvertent effects of waves and currents – the vessel can pitch or sway outside normal operating limits. This can create a buckle at the point that the string of pipe has the largest curvature (i.e., where it leaves the vessel or where it joins the seabed). Two things can happen when the pipe buckles: in one instance, the buckle will flatten the pipe together, but it will not break. This is called a “dry buckle,” and can be fixed by going back and cutting the joint, moving back and cutting more, until the buckle is encountered and pulled out. Then the lay vessel will start that section over. Although a dry buckle wastes pipeline materials and time, it’s nowhere near the cost of the second instance – a wet buckle. When a wet buckle occurs, the pipeline is severed and water enters the line, filling the suspended section that is being laid. This causes several problems: for one, the lay vessel is calculated to hold the pipeline at a certain weight and let it out as it moves forward, but when it is filled with water, the pipe becomes much heavier. “There are only two or three lay vessels in the world that can hold a deepwater pipeline filled with water,” cautions George Lim, an offshore expert with TDW. “The vessel has a maximum tension capacity and if the pipeline becomes too heavy it will pull the chain out of the lay vessel.” And if the pipeline comes loose, it can flail
• 2015
Laying subsea pipelines requires a long string of pipeline to be carefully placed on a seabed up to 3,000 meters (1.8 miles) below the water’s surface. The vessel moves along laying pipe, with each 12 meter pipe joint being welded to the next to form a suspended string (or chain) that is then lowered to the seafloor as the vessel moves along by its own propulsion. During the pipe laying process – due to the
Wet Buckle
I N N OVAT I O N S
Due, in part, to the industry adoption of the double block and monitor isolation method – and the proven technology that makes it work – offshore operators sought to apply a similar approach to mitigating the risk of wet buckle during subsea pipe laying (one of the most costly undertakings in the offshore industry). Although isolating pipeline while laying it may seem like a somewhat different endeavor than isolating a pipeline to safeguard against dropped objects or during maintenance, the theory behind the two systems is actually quite similar. In each instance, the isolation system is set in place to safely maintain the integrity of the pipeline. In the case of isolations during pipe laying, however, the isolation happens much more quickly and only as needed.
F E AT U R E S T O RY
plug during work on a wellhead. During attempts to stop the leak, the West Atlas offshore platform caught fire. Australia declared the incident to be a national disaster. Although the Australian disaster was not related to a dropped object and ruptured subsea pipeline, this incident provided the impetus for Australia’s offshore oil and gas regulatory body, NOPSEMA, to prescribe the use of isolation plugs, like the SmartPlug isolation system, as a preventive measure for offshore pipeline interventions. By implementing such regulation the severity of similar future incidents would be greatly reduced.
25
2015 • V O L . V I I , N O. 3 • I N N OVAT I O N S
26
around uncontrollably, risking massive damage to pipe. the lay vessel and people on board before falling Typically, a minimum of one such device is down to the seabed. present to close off the newly laid pipeline on the Another consequence of a wet buckle is that the seabed. Additional devices can be placed in the seawater and soil contaminate the newly laid line, buckling “zone” (i.e., where the line leaves the meaning that the operator must dewater it before vessel and where it joins the seabed). Then, the the vessel can start laying pipeline again. Dewatering flooded section between the buckle and SmartLay is a lengthy process. First, the damaged area of the tool can be simply cut out before continuing the line is cut, then pigs with special inhibitors are laying process. pushed to dry the line so that it can be picked up again and the laying process can continue. If the line buckles and there is water Dewatering is also expensive, ingress, the tool immediately senses requiring a fleet of pumps and compressors to be on standby. The the seawater and sets itself in the rental fee for this spread, which can pipe within one second – preventing occupy an area the size of a football field, is significant. In addition, the water from flooding the pipe. lay vessels cost around US$500,000 per day or more and will be delayed on standby while the line is dewatered. According to Lim, the SmartLay isolation tool – already delivered to a few major offshore operators End of the Wet Buckle who have further developed deployment methods Until recently, there were no viable methods for to suit their particular pipelay operations – prevents preventing flooding as a consequence of a wet buckle. flooding of the pipeline, reduces risk to personnel, However, TDW has developed the SmartLay™ pipeand eliminates the need and extreme cost to dewater. laying isolation system – based on some of the key design aspects of the proven SmartPlug isolation tool. Reducing the Inevitable When laying pipe, one method of deploying the Every year the offshore industry adopts more SmartLay isolation tool is to pull it forward inside regulations and safety processes, and we are indeed the line via cable running through the suspended safer for it. However, regardless of how many section of pipe. Another method is pulling it forward preventive procedures are put in place, accidents by means of a self-contained vehicle (tractor or – even low-probability ones – will still occur. So, crawler) set in front of the SmartLay tool. When although these advancing isolation technologies a new joint is welded onto the pipeline, the tool is can’t reduce the probability of an incident, they can advanced in the line. In a normal situation, it glides reduce the consequences. through the pipe as it’s laid, but if the line buckles “The SmartLay and SmartPlug systems are and there is water ingress, the tool immediately risk reduction tools,” explains Lim. “Risk is senses the seawater and sets itself in the pipe within equal to the probability of failure multiplied one second – preventing water from flooding the by the consequence. Tools like these reduce the consequences of an unfortunate incident.”
RISK
= PROBABILITY OF FAILURE X CONSEQUENCE
Future Thinking CONTINUED FROM PAGE 11
• V O L . V I I , N O. 3 • 2015
2015_Gas_Transmission_SS_BMG_Abstract.pdf
I N N OVAT I O N S
Internal costs generally Operators worry that if the NTSB’s pipeline comprise an operator’s project safety recommendations result in new management, from engineering regulations, they could be looking at significant designs to environmental remediation. Direct job site costs costs during a season of low oil prices. encompass third-party vendors and their work, from welders to the first try, another cost-saving feature. In addition, the excavation process. the system reduces the size of the excavation The study’s conservative calculations are based needed to access the pipe – lowering equipment on a completed project where the operator owned costs – and minimizes the risk of costly third-party the pipeline system, but not the product it carries. damage. “If there’s a shutdown for an operator that owns all And in certain circumstances, the system allows of the assets, the shutdown cuts off their supply operators to run a bypass directly through the of incoming cash flow and becomes even more housing of the plugging system, further reducing expensive,” says project author Veronyca Kwan, a the need for additional fittings and associated costs. Senior Business Market Analyst with TDW. Whether they choose the standard HT&P Income loss is one of the primary concerns process or more advanced isolation technology, the facing transmission line operators as they try to strategic investments in line modifications will not decide how and when to respond to the NTSB’s ILI only help operators achieve compliance with the recommendations. And the ability to prevent such NTSB’s recommendations, the work will enhance losses – by continuing pipeline operations – is one of their pipeline integrity management programs, the key reasons that HT&P procedures could prove provide operators with more actionable inline hugely beneficial to operators that move forward inspection data, and help them safely maximize with a multiyear modification project to get their throughput. pipeline system in compliance. In the case of STOPPLE Train isolation technology, shutdown Double Double Stopple Train Isolation with Bypass prevention is one of several features that could make compliance with the NTSB recommendations more cost-effective, says Grant Cooper, Manager of Commercialization, HT&P Technology, for TDW. “What we’ve done is expand standard block and bleed technology, so you can weld two fittings on the pipeline, instead of four,” Cooper says. “In one fitting you have a double block and bleed isolation, which means it’s not only less costly, it’s even safer.” The two independent seals used to establish the system’s double block and bleed capability also increase the * NTSB Study: www.ntsb.gov/news/events/Documents/ likelihood of a successful workable seal on TDW e-book on pending IVP regulations: www.TDW-IVP.com
27
4 Battling Pipe steps to
BY THE NUMBERS
PIPELINE INTEGRITY: A COMPREHENSIVE VIEW
Pipeline operators face the continual challenge of delivering energy to the world in the safest and most economical ways. They battle aging infrastructure, weather economic pressures, adjust to increasing regulation, and engage communities to achieve social license. Fortunately, continual advances in pipeline threat detection, such as multiple dataset platforms, are supporting them every inch of the way. Follow steps 1-4 to see how.
MULTIPLE DATASET (MDS) PLATFORMS can supply pipeline operators with a comprehensive view of their line integrity by providing a vehicle for an evolving combination of overlapping inspection technologies to be run on a single tool, at the same time. THE RESULT: robust threat detection and advanced characterization.
3
LFM
SMFL
DEF
MFL
XYZ
REPORT When critically assessed by specialized software and data analysts, the overlapping MDS data helps determine the exact characteristics and severity of the entire series of interacting threats – a re-rounded dent with gouging and crack-like features.
Metal loss, re-rounding, cycling, dent length and depth, strain and severity ranking.
eline Integrity Threats DETECT While running an MDS platform, mechanical (i.e., third-party) damage is detected by a number of onboard technologies.
2
CHARACTERIZE Each technology on the MDS platform
provides a unique layer of damage information, providing full characterization of the threat.
XYZ MAPPING
Locates the anomaly relative to the centerline of the pipe.
DEFORMATION
Defines the anomaly as a dent.
LOW FIELD MAGNETIC FLUX LEAKAGE
HIGH RESOLUTION MAGNETIC FLUX LEAKAGE
SpirALL® MAGNETIC FLUX LEAKAGE
4
1
Identifies re-rounding (or rebounding) of the dent.
Recognizes volumetric metal loss within the dent.
Identifies axially oriented metal loss or gouging within the dent.
PRIORITIZE/MITIGATE With the final integrity report delivered in close proximity to the inspection, the pipeline operator is able to: • Assess the pipeline’s most critical needs
• Minimize cost by avoiding unnecessary digs
• Prioritize maintenance/repair based on severity
• Ensure safe operation for its employees and the community
OPERATIONOFFSHORE.COM #operationoffshore
T.D. WILLIAMSON / MCG PRODUCTIONS PRESENT“OPERATION OFFSHORE” m MARK SIM, TODD BEADLE, GORDON BLAIR, ALEXEY TUGANOV, ANTON KOVALENKO, LAURENT FABRY, TAMMY WISENBAKER, KEVIN MCNAUGHTON, PAOLA CORRALES, STEVE APPLETON, ALEXANDRE PETRAGLIA, /ROLF GUNNAR LIE DEVELOPMENT TECHNICAL BASED ON DIRECTORS LARRY RYAN, GEORGE LIM DIRECTORS JEFF WILSON, GARY ANDERSON x MIKE BENJAMIN, CHAD FLETCHER THE STORY RISK ON THE PLATFORM © Copyright 2015 T.D. Williamson, Inc
