comparisons between iec vs ansi switchgear.pdf
Short Description
comparisons...
Description
Arne Ar ney y Ka Kane nerr - Ma May y 3, 3, 201 2013 3
SpotLIGHT Webinar ompar so sons e ween an ANSI/IEEE switchgear features © ABB Inc. May 2, 2013 2013 | Slide 1
ANSI vs. IEC standards
IEC = International Electrotechnical omm ss on
Founded in 1904 in St. Louis, MO Reco nized b the Wo Worl rld d Tr Trade Organization Consists of over 50 National Com Co mmi mitt ttee ees, s, ea each ch ha hav vin e ua uall vot otin in rights Represents 85 % of the world’s population and 95 % of the electric energy produced and consumed
Potential customer profile and application
•
Self-insured entities, such as an Electric Utility.
•
Large, heavy industrial enterprise , i.e. aluminum smelter, steel mill, refinery.
•
Ex erience and willin ness to work with the local electrical ins ector.
•
Confined space – need “front access only” type of equipment
•
Non-Standard system voltage, i.e. 16kV, 24kV
•
Customer wants to have a grounding switch for outgoing feeders.
•
Equipment ratings do not exceed 600A/31.5kA, since within these ratings IEC switchgear has dimensional advantages.
ANSI vs. IEC standards
Medium Voltage Switchgear
ANSI C37 vs. IEC 62271
Low Voltage Switchgear
,
,
vs.
Degree of protection per IEC 60529 Protection against ingress of solid foreign objects
Degree of protection per IEC 60529 Protection against harmful ingress of water
ANSI vs. IEC standards
Motor Control Center
IEC: No differentiation one common standard
Temperature ratings
ANSI/UL: Different standards for Switchgear and Motor Control Centers
ANSI: Ambient temperature between -30°C and +40°C IEC: Maximum of +40°C (options for +50/55°C) and minimum of -5°C (options for -15/25°C)
Installation
ANSI: Indoor and outdoor IEC: Indoor only
ANSI vs. IEC standards
Interlocking
IEC: General rules, electro-mechanic interlocking preferred
nc osure
ANSI: Specific rules; key-interlocking preferred
ANSI: Differentiation between enclosure and vent openings, minimum thickness IEC: No differentiation and no specification
Insulation
IEC: Busbar design left to the manufacturer
ANSI vs. IEC standards
Instrument Transformers
ANSI: Window-type current transformers on both sides of the circuit breaker IEC: Cast resin current transformers on line-side of the circuit breaker Option for non-traditional current and voltage sensors in IEC switch ear
Low Voltage Compartment
ANSI: Depending on specific designs, there may not be a LV – breaker compartment door IEC: LV compartment with metallic separation from HV
ANSI vs. IEC standards
Electromagnetic Compatibility
IEC: General rules, electro-mechanic interlocking preferred
e ec r c es ng
UL: No specification
UL: No BIL test required, lower power frequency test voltage IEC: BIL test with 1.2/50 re uired, hi her ower fre uenc test voltage
Clearances
IEC: Creepage distances defined based on material quality, clearances defined based on over-voltage category
Definitions - IEC 62271
Compartment Accessibility
Interlock-controlled accessible Procedure-based accessible oo - ase access Non-accessible
e
Definitions - IEC 62271
Loss of Service Continuity
LSC1
LSC2A
1
LV Compartment
2
Pressure Relief Duct (optional)
4
Circuit Breaker Compartment
5
Cable Compartment
Switchgear must be completely de-ener ized before o enin circuit breaker compartment
, functional units adjacent to the one to be opened can remain energized
LSC2B
As LSC2A, but cable energized
Definitions - IEC 62271
Internal Arc Classification
Accessibility: A, B or C – front / lateral / rear
A (F, L, R): to authorized personnel B (F, L, R): to all installation
Test values
Test current in kilo-amperes (kA) Duration in seconds (s)
Definitions - IEC 62271 / 61641
Test Criteria for Personnel Protection
Doors must remain closed and no opening of the cover panels must occur No hazardous arts to be e ected No holes in the external housing in any parts accessible to personnel
incinerate
All earthing connections must remain effective
Definitions - VDE0660 part 500
Test Criteria for Plant Protection (incl. System Function)
Arc must be limited to defined area and must not re-ignite in adjacent units Emer enc o eration of the switch ear ossible after fault has been repaired and/ or respective functional units of the defined area have been isolated or removed
Differences between IEEE and IEC AR testing
The two largest differences between the IEEE C37.20.7 and the IEC ² IEC Type B accessibility. IEEE C37.20.7 testing used 150gm/ m² cotton material for all accessibility ratings of 2, 2B and 2C and 2BC. In addition, we place all test cloths 10cm from the front and sides of the . The IEEE testing guide defines the Rating Basis as the rated short time current of the equipment. The testing guide permits a minimum of 10-c cles 0.167s throu h a maximum of 30-c cles 0.5s of rated arc duration. The minimum duration of 0.167s is designed as an arcfault test for resistance of the switchgear to pressure increase. This tests the ability to contain the explosive forces until the expanding gas is relieved in a controlled manner and for burn-throu h of the arcin erosion of the switchgear walls until most relaying will remove the source of the fault. The maximum test duration of 0.5s establishes a longer time duration to show burn-through resistance for longer relay coordination before the fault source is removed .
IEC vs. IEEE arc-resistant requirements IEC 62271-200 vs. IEEE C37.20.7 ARC-RESISTANT REQUIREMENTS
Requirement
IEEE C37.20.7
IEC 62271-200
Test Voltage
Same as equipment
Same as equipment
. x rms
. x rms
es
urren pea
Test Duration
167ms for pressure 0.5 sec for burn-through
167ms for pressure 1 sec for burn-through*
Arc- Initiation
0.5mm diameter wire
0.5mm diameter wire
Indicators
150g/m / m² all Types 150mm x 150mm frame
150g/m / m² Type A 40g/m / m² Type B * 150mm x 150mm frame
2 meters high
. B. front / sides 10cm away C. front / side / adjacent 10cm away *
. B. facing surfaces 10cm away
ANSI vs. IEC standards
For Switchgear ANSI / UL and IEC have very different philosophies
IEC Standards DO…
an ar s
…
…define fabrication techniques and material solutions
Neither ANSI / UL nor IEC is “better”
…define requirements for performance and testing
Note, however, that UL does not define arc-resistance
Do not try to “mix and match” ANSI /UL and IEC standards
IEC Switchgear
© ABB Inc. May 2, 2013 | Slide 19
IEC Switchgear
© ABB Inc. May 2, 2013 | Slide 20
UniGear ZS1 single level section view
Unit compartments
© ABB Inc. May 2, 2013 | Slide 21
A Circuit-breaker compartment B Main Bus compartment a e compar men D Low voltage compartment E Compact gas duct channel
ABB UniGear
Passive Arc Protection
Design to withstand the thermodynamic stress of an internal arc
Se mentation into com artments Mechanical rigidity Pressure relief with arc duct Protective relaying
Active Arc Protection (optional)
exposure to an internal arc
Pressure sensors Combination of optical and current sensors
ABB UniGear
Vacuum circuit breakers
Spring mechanism Magnetic actuator
Fused vacuum contactor
ABB UniGear
Conventional current and voltage transformers Innovative current and voltage sensors
Large dynamic range nsens ve o erroresonance an voltage components Short-circuit proof Short delivery
Questions to ask the customer to identify opportunity
•
Would your insurance carrier recognize non-UL listing/certificate? xamp es: ; ana a Would you work with your local electrical inspector to get a permit? ABB will provide all required technical support.
•
If the switchgear is installed against the wall, and does not require rear access – would it solve your problem?
•
s e es gn oa w n an e ava a e s or c rcu curren does not exceed 31.5kA? ABB’s IEC switchgear would save both space and money.
© ABB Inc. May 2, 2013 | Slide 25
Contact information
If you have further questions , please contact me: PRESENTER
Arney Kaner, PE
COMPANY
ABB Inc.
PHONE
(847) 486-1290
-
© ABB Inc. May 2, 2013 | Slide 26
.
.
.
View more...
Comments