Common Practice Problems Electrical Part 1 (21May11)

September 17, 2017 | Author: Looi Hip Peu | Category: Electrical Wiring, Electrical Conductor, Force, Electricity, Electromagnetism
Share Embed Donate


Short Description

10 Common Practice Problems Electrical Part 1...

Description

25 Common Problems for M&E Engineers Armada Hotel , Petaling Jaya 26th May 2011

10 Common Electrical Design Problems – Part I Ir. Looi Hip Peu Hon Sec, ACEM (2010/11) B.Eng (Hons) (Electrical) P.Eng (5226), Jurutera Gas [email protected]

CONTENT

2

Objectives of this Workshop

System Design

Wiring Design

Protection

Installation

1. Tariff selection

3. Earthing system

7. RCD selection

9. Standards

2. Generator sizing

4. PE cable selection

8. Motor starting

10. Malaysian wiring code

5. Mains cable sizing 6. Al vs Cu cables

[email protected]

26th May 2011

OBJECTIVES OF WORKSHOP

3

What are the Objectives of this Workshop?  In the Malaysian context, Electrical engineers are required to design to MS standards and standards approved.  This responsibility requires: 1. Understanding design principles 2. Understanding Technical Standards 3. Awareness of latest Standards 4. Staying „current‟ in knowledge base  The above protects the consultant engineer from claims of „negligence‟. [email protected]

26th May 2011

OBJECTIVES OF WORKSHOP

4

This Workshop Module List 5 Common Problems !  This workshop list 10 common design failures. Failures are grouped as follows: 1. System design failures 2. Wiring design failures 3. Protection design failures 4. Installation & Other issues

[email protected]

26th May 2011

1

[email protected]

S e l e c t i n g Ta r i f f S t r u c t u re

26th May 2011

6 1

SYSTEM DESIGN – CORRECT TARIFF SELECTION

At d e s i gn p l a n n i n g sta ge t h e M & E e n g i n e e r i s r e q u i re d t o :

Load and electricity capacity calculations

[email protected]

Substation Space Planning

Advice Client on Tariff Selection

Formal application to TNB.

26th May 2011

7

SYSTEM DESIGN – CORRECT TARIFF SELECTION

1

[email protected]

TNB Supply Handbook 2007

26th May 2011

8

SYSTEM DESIGN – CORRECT TARIFF SELECTION

Vo l ta ge L e ve l S e l e c t i o n

1 MD ranges

Supply Voltage

Typical Supply Scheme

Up to 12kVA

230V

Overhead service mains from LV mains

12kVA – 100kVA

400V

3 phase o/h or u/g LV existing service mains

100kVA – 1000kVA 400V

Direct cable service from LV board in substations (single or double chamber)

1000kVA – 5000kVA

11kV

Directly fed thro’ TNB 11kV system (11kV switch room

1000kVA – 10000kVA

22kV

Directly fed thro’ TNB 11kV system (22kV switch room)

500kVA – 25000kVA

33kV

Directly fed thro’ TNB 11kV system (33kV switch room

Above 25000kVA

132kV 275kV

Directly fed thro’ TNB 132/275kV system (132/275kV switching stations)

[email protected]

26th May 2011

SYSTEM DESIGN – CORRECT TARIFF SELECTION

9 1 Tariff

Unit

Rates

A

(Domestic)

sen/kWh

21.8 to 46 sen

B

(LV Commercial) Up to 200kWh >200kWh

sen/kWh sen/kWh

38.0 40.8

(MV General Commercial) MD consumption kWh consumption

RM/kW sen/kWh

24.6 29.6

(MV peak/off peak Commercial) MD consumption kWh consumption (peak hours) kWh consumption (off peak hours)

RM/kW sen/kWh sen/kWh

36.6 29.6 18.2

(LV Industrial) Up to 200kWh >200kWh

sen/kWh sen/kWh

34.2 36.6

C1

C2

D

[email protected]

26th May 2011

SYSTEM DESIGN – CORRECT TARIFF SELECTION

10 1

Tariff

E1

E2

E3

Unit

Rates

(MV General Industrial) MD consumption kWh consumption

RM/kW sen/kWh

24.6 28.0

(MV peak/off peak Industrial) MD consumption kWh consumption (peak hours) kWh consumption (off peak hours)

RM/kW sen/kWh sen/kWh

30.8 29.6 18.2

(HV peak/off peak Industrial) MD consumption kWh consumption (peak hours) kWh consumption (off peak hours)

RM/kW sen/kWh sen/kWh

29.6 28.6 16.8

The selection of voltage connection and tariff selection have some relation. However at “ b o r d e r l i n e c a s e s ”, s o m e d e v i a t i o n s a r e a l l o w e d . [email protected]

26th May 2011

11

SYSTEM DESIGN – CORRECT TARIFF SELECTION

1

Selecting tariff has commercial consequence LV Connection Tariff B/D

2000kVA

peak/off peak Tariff C2/E2 [email protected]

26th May 2011

1

Cost difference between tariff E1 (higher) & D (lower) at 80% load diversity

Cost difference between tariff E1 (higher) & D (lower) at 60% load diversity

1

Monthly charge difference between tariff E1 (higher) and E2 (lower) for 3 shifts

At only 2 shifts charges under tariff E1 may be lower than tariff E2.

14

SYSTEM DESIGN – CORRECT TARIFF SELECTION

1

Common failure by inexperienced practitioner (including contractors who advise clients)?

 No study is done to determine the correct tariff structure during planning stage.  The wrong tariff structure in case of MD around 7 5 0 k VA t o 1 . 5 k V A i s p r o p o s e d .  The wrong tariff structure in case of selection between p eak/o ff p eak or gen eral tar iff structu re is proposed.

[email protected]

26th May 2011

15

SYSTEM DESIGN – CORRECT TARIFF SELECTION

1

Common failure by inexperienced practitioners (including contractors who advised clients)?

P r e 2 0 0 6 Tar iff Str ucture  At less th an 1M VA LV tar iff is lo wer th an M V tar iff.

 For lo ad > 1M VA and load di ver sit y > 7 5% M V tar i ff str u ctu r e is ch eap er. Ho we ver a d eta il l oad an a l ys i s need to b e exe cuted to d eter m ine th e b est tar i f f str u ctu re .  Th ey ex i s t a c l e a r d e l i n e a t i o n b e t w e e n C 2 / E 2 (peak/off peak tariffs) and C1/E1 (general tariffs) when at least 3 shifts are run. However this 3 shifts must be translated into high kWh consumption during off-peak hours. Study need to be done to ascertain at planning stage. [email protected]

26th May 2011

SYSTEM DESIGN – CORRECT TARIFF SELECTION

16

Monthly Charges

Monthly Charges

1

MD kW

Monthly Charges

Monthly Charges

MD kW

kWh consumption

Pre 2006 Tariff [email protected]

kWh consumption

Post 2006 Tariff 26th May 2011

17 1

SYSTEM DESIGN – CORRECT TARIFF SELECTION

Conclusion 1. A clear delineation between LV and MV tariff is presented in the post 2006 tariff. The consultant if possible should opt for LV tariff taking into consideration availability and capacity of existing LV network and substations. Planners can also look at the possibility of „connection at MV‟ but „metering at LV‟ since new rules are being drafted by TNB to force connection at MV even at 500kVA. 2. The post 2006 tariff structure is much less supportive of „peak/off peak‟ demand-management. This require a more stringent analysis of load demand and the economics of running 3-shifts. 3. Current TNB supply agreement specify that tariff opted must stay for 5 years before changing tariff in agreement.

[email protected]

26th May 2011

2

[email protected]

S e l e c t i n g G e n e ra to r C a p a c i t y

26th May 2011

SELECTING GENERATOR CAPACITY

19 2

G e n e ra to r s e t s a r e m a n d a to r y i n t h e fo l l o w i n g i n s t a n c e s : Law / By Law

Conditions

Standby Generator

1 UBBL Section 243

Fire Lift to be provided for Standby generator buildings where last occupied required as 2ndary floor is 18.5m above fire supply for fire lifts. appliance access level.

2 UBBL Sections 226, 231, 232, 244, 247 etc and 10 Schedule

Sprinkler, Wet Riser, Pressurised Hydrants, Hose Reel system(s) to be provided in accordance with occupancy hazard class and built-up area in accordance with Tenth Schedule of UBBL.

[email protected]

Standby generator only required if the 2ndary supply to services pumps are NOT diesel engine.

26th May 2011

SELECTING GENERATOR CAPACITY

20 2

U B B L Te n t h S c h e d u l e ; Secondary supply for Fire Services Typical Scheme

 Standby services for fire pump is electric.  Mains standby generator provide 2ndary supply to standby electric pump.  Mains Standby Generator has to be sized to cater for fire pump starting surge [email protected]

26th May 2011

SELECTING GENERATOR CAPACITY

21 2

U B B L Te n t h S c h e d u l e ; Secondary supply for Fire Services Alternative Case 1  Standby services for fire pump diesel engine.  Mains standby generator not required if UBBL 2 4 3 d o n o t a p p l y.

[email protected]

26th May 2011

SELECTING GENERATOR CAPACITY

22 2

U B B L Te n t h S c h e d u l e ; Secondary supply for Fire Services Alternative Case 2

 Standby services for fire pump is diesel engine.  UBBL 243 (fire lift) requires mains standby g e n e r a t o r.

 Mains Standby Generator only has to be sized to cater for fire lift starting surge [email protected]

26th May 2011

23

SELECTING GENERATOR CAPACITY 2

[email protected]



Mains Standby generator need to cater for fire pump (50HP) starting surge.



Mains essential l o a d 2 0 0 k W.



Standby Generator: required,



Only 1 pump to maintain.



Mains Standby generator need to only to cater for fire lift starting surge.



Capacity 2 5 0 k VA .



Separate 50HP fire pump.



2 pumps to maintain.

of

supply

standby diesel

steady

5 0 0 - 6 0 0 k VA

generator: engine

for

26th May 2011

SELECTING GENERATOR CAPACITY

24 2

G en erator Sel ec t i o n; Co mmo n Fai l u res  Generator not sized to take into account starting surge of largest motor in system. Ge nerator not s ized to ta ke into account starting surge of largest motor in system.

Generator size = 150kVA Generator starting!

will

stall

on

lift

Generator size = 250kVA C orre ct s iz ing of Ge nerator to take into account lift starting surge (assume 4x rated). [email protected]

26th May 2011

SELECTING GENERATOR CAPACITY

25 2

G en erator Sel ec t i o n; Co mmo n Fai l u res  Generator not sized to take into account starting surge of largest motor in system. Ge nerator not s ized to take into account starting surge of largest motor in system. Assume = 1 5 0 k VA

essential

steady

load

Fire pump= 75HP & starting surge 5.5 x rated

Generator size = 250kVA

Generator size = 420kVA (min size)

Generator will stall on Fire Pump starting!

Correct sizing of Generator to take into account lift starting surge.

[email protected]

26th May 2011

SELECTING GENERATOR CAPACITY

26 2

B e s t P ra c t i c e

 Large Installation where standby generator is required under UBBL 243. Use separate diesel engine for standby fire pump.  In all case size generator to cater for starting surge of largest motor:

Generator Capacity = (Steady state of Essential Load) – (Less largest motor) + (Starting surge of largest motor)

[email protected]

26th May 2011

3

[email protected]

Ea r t h Sys t e m

26th May 2011

28

3 WIRING DESIGN – EARTHING SYSTEM

Many Electrical Engineers are still confused on specifying type of earthing system What are the types of earthing systems used in Malaysia which are in accordance with MS, IEC or BS wiring standards?

EARTHING FOR POWER DISTRIBUTION

DEFINITIONS – TT, IT, TN-C & TN-S SYSTEMS

[email protected]

26th May 2011

29

3 WIRING DESIGN – EARTHING SYSTEM

EARTHING FOR POWER DISTRIBUTION

DEFINITIONS – TT, IT, TN-C & TN-S SYSTEMS MS/IEC60364 earthing – 2 letters:

(a) 1st letter Transformer neutral: (i) “T” for connected

(ii) “I” for isolated (b) 2nd letter; Frame earth: (i) “T” for directly connected to earth (ii) “N” for connected to the neutral at the origin of installation. British IEE or BS7671 has the same definitions. [email protected]

26th May 2011

30

3 WIRING DESIGN – EARTHING SYSTEM DEFINITIONS – TN-C, TN-S, TN-CS SYSTEMS The TN System can also be sub divided into sub system by the addition of a 3rd letter: TN-C; N & PE are common (PEN) TN-S; N & PE are separate TN-C-S; TN-C occurs up -stream & TN-S downstream

[email protected]

26th May 2011

31

3 WIRING DESIGN – EARTHING SYSTEM

DEFINITIONS – TT, IT, TN-C & TN-S SYSTEMS

Various sub system can co-exist within one system.

[email protected]

26th May 2011

32

3 WIRING DESIGN – EARTHING SYSTEM TT System TNS System

[email protected]

Earth at both ends has 3P and N (4 cables) Earth at source only, has 3P, N & P.E. (5 cables)

26th May 2011

33

3 WIRING DESIGN – EARTHING SYSTEM

[email protected]

26th May 2011

34

3 WIRING DESIGN – EARTHING SYSTEM

TT system in public distribution

Malaysia

TN-C system in public distribution

UK (parts)

[email protected]

26th May 2011

35

3 WIRING DESIGN – EARTHING SYSTEM

[email protected]

26th May 2011

36

3

WIRING DESIGN – EARTH & P.E.

Network/Operation Criteria Continuity of service critical maintenance service available

System Chosen /Preferred and

IT chosen

Continuity of service critical and No satisfactory solution, TT consistent maintenance service NOT preferred as discrimination tripping available is easier to implement and damages lesser with respect to TN. Continuity of service NOT critical; competent maintenance services available.

TN-S chosen (rapid repairs and extension easily performed).

Continuity of service NOT critical; No satisfactory solution, TT system competent maintenance service NOT preferred. available. Fire hazard critical and maintenance services available. [email protected]

IT and use of 5mA RCD OR TT system 26th May 2011

37

3

WIRING DESIGN – EARTH & P.E.

Network/Operation Criteria

System Chosen /Preferred

Special features; very long networks

TT preferred

Special features; Standby Power Supply

TT preferred

Special features; Load sensitive to high load currents (e.g. motors)

TT preferred OR IT can be acceptable

Special features; Low natural insulation (furnace) OR very large HF filters (computers).

TN-S preferred.

Special features; control and monitoring systems

IT for continuity of service OR TT for enhanced equipotentiality

[email protected]

26th May 2011

38

3

WIRING DESIGN – EARTH & P.E.

Co mmo n Fai l u res  No clear understanding of Earthing system  In campus type environment, TT system between switch boards are used (only 4 cables and without PE) however proper earthing at both ends are not installed.  Wro n g e art h in g syste m s e le cted , e . g . mo st en gine ers are N OT fam iliar wit h “ IT ” system (un ea rth ed neutral) . However IT system should be used in critical ser vices such as operating theatre. Current initiatives are being undertaken to draft standards and promote use of IT system for critical service in Malaysia.

[email protected]

26th May 2011

4

[email protected]

T h e P r o t e c t i ve Ea r t h

26th May 2011

40

4

WIRING DESIGN – EARTH & P.E.

Many Electrical Engineers are still confused on specifying type of earthing system and the associated protective earth conductors.

Ty p i c a l s p e c i f i c at i o n s : Wiring to comply with IEE wiring regulations…

Ty p i c a l d e s c r i p t i o n i n p r i c e d e s c r i p t i o n 1. Lighting wiring using 2x1.5mm²-1C + E 2. Sub mains wiring using 4x50mm²-1C + E

What is this “+ E” ? TT System TNS System [email protected]

Earth at both ends has 3P and N (4 cables) Earth at source only, has 3P, N & P.E. (5 cables) 26th May 2011

41

4

WIRING DESIGN – EARTH & P.E.

After 2000 This is A C C E P TA B L E .

Before 2000 “Earth continuity ” cables are typically:

NOT

Cabling system will be deemed not in compliance with MS, IEC and IEE wiring codes.

C o p p e r t a p e C a b l e a r m o u r i n g E v e n c o n t i n u i t y o f c a b l e t r u n k i n g / t r a y s . [email protected]

26th May 2011

42

4

WIRING DESIGN – EARTH & P.E.

W h a t i s a l l o wa b l e a s P. E . ? Types of P.E. approved

Conductors in multi core cables Insulated or bare conductors in a common enclosure with live conductors Fixed installed bare or insulated conductors

Metallic cables sheath, cable screen, cable armour, wirebraid, concentric conductors, metallic conduit subject to compliance with 543.2.2. In China, Italy, UK etc cable trays and ladders can be used as P.E. Types of P.E. not approved [543.2.3] Water pipes

Support wire …others [email protected]

26th May 2011

43

4

WIRING DESIGN – EARTH & P.E.

EARTHING ARRANGEMENT PART 5-54 Cross sectional areas of line conductors S (mm²)

If the protective conductor is of the same material as the line conductor

If the protective conductor is not of the same material as the line conductor

S < 16

S

K1/K2 x S

16 < S < 35

16 a

K1/K2 x 16

S > 35

Minimum cross sectional area of the corresponding protective conductor (mm²)

S/2

a

K1/K2 x S/2

Where K1 is the value of k for the line conductor, selected from table A54.1 or from the tables of IEC50364-4-43 according to the resistance of the conductor and insulation. K2 is the value of k for the conductor selected from tables A 54.2 to A54.6 as applicable a

for a PEN conductor the reduction of the cross section area is permitted only in accordance with the rules for sizing of the neutral conductor (see IEC 60364-5-52). [email protected]

26th May 2011

44

4

WIRING DESIGN – EARTH & P.E.

EARTHING ARRANGEMENT PART 5-54  Generally P.E. must be half size phase conductor.

 Circuit with phases 1200A more than 100m 2. Ensure installation method match designed method.

3. Using many cables per phase has diminishing returns. Use bus ducts for >1200A. [email protected]

26th May 2011

25 Common Problems for M&E Engineers Armada Hotel , Petaling Jaya 26th May 2011

Ir. Looi Hip Peu | [email protected]

View more...

Comments

Copyright ©2017 KUPDF Inc.
SUPPORT KUPDF