Class Notes 1CSR

Share Embed Donate


Short Description

Corporate social responsibility class notes for mba USMS, GGSIPU....

Description

Corporate Social Responsibility, Human Values and Ethics 

Unit 1



Moral Values and Ethics: Values  – Concepts, Types and Formation of Values, Ethics and Behaviour.



Ethical Decision Making, Business Ethics- The Changing Environment and Stakeholder Management, Relevance of Ethics and Values in Business, Spiritual Values. Modern Business Ethics and Dilemmas,



Overview of Corporate Social Responsibilities (CSR) and Sustainability.



Values of Indian Managers; Managerial Excellence through Human Values; Development of Ethics,



Unit II



Managing Ethical Dilemmas at Work: The Corporation and External Stakeholders, Corporate Governance: From the Boardroom to the Marketplace, Corporate Responsibilities towards Consumer Stakeholders and the Environment; Environm ent;



The Corporation and Internal Stakeholders; Values-Based Moral Leadership Culture, Strategy and Self-Regulation; Spiritual Leadership for Business Transformation.



Organizational Excellence and Employee Wellbeing through Human Values.



Unit III



Corporate Social Responsibility: A Historical Perspective from Industrial Revolution to Social Activism; Moral Arguments for Corporate Social Responsibility,







Development of Corporate Conscience as the Moral Principle of Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Social Responsibility of Business, Employees, Consumers and Community. Corporate Governance and Code of Corporate Governance, Consumerism, Current CSR Practices of the Firms in India and Abroad. Challenges of Environment: Principles of Environmental Ethics, Environmental Challenges as Business Opportunity, Affirmative Action as a form of Social Justice.



Unit IV



Issues in Moral conduct of Business and CSR: Failure of Corporate Governance, Social Audit,





Unethical Issues in Sales, Marketing, Advertising and Technology: Internet Crime and Punishment, Intellectual Property Rights, Corruption in Business and Administration.



BS / ISO Guideline on CSR Management (ISO-26000).



Text Books



Weiss, Joseph W (2009). Business Ethics: Concepts & Cases, Cengage Learning.



Colin Fisher and Alan Lovell (2009). Business ethics and values: Individual, Corporate and International Perspectives, Prentice Hall.



Moral Values and Ethics



Values – Concepts



Types and Formation of Values



Ethics and Behaviour.



A Question ? Values





Values are the rules by which we make decisions about right and wrong, should and shouldn't, good and bad. They also tell us which are more or less important, which is useful when we have to trade off meeting one value over another. Dictionary.com defines values as:

n : beliefs of a person or social group in which they have an emotional investment (either for or against something); "he has very conservatives values" 

Value



Values are beliefs. But they are beliefs tied inextricably to emotion, not objective, cold ideas.



Values are a motivational construct. They refer to the desirable goals people strive to attain.



Values transcend specific actions and situations. They are abstract goals. The abstract nature of values distinguishes them from concepts like norms and attitudes, which usually refer to specific actions, objects, or situations.



Values guide the selection or evaluation of actions, policies, people, and events. That is, values serves as standards or criteria



Values are ordered by importance relative to one another. People’s values form

an ordered system of value priorities that characterize them as individuals. This hierarchical feature of values also distinguishes them from norms and attitudes.

Morals



Morals have a greater social element to values and tend to have a very broad acceptance. Morals are far more about good and bad than other values. We thus  judge others more strongly on morals than values. A person can be described as immoral, yet there is no word for them not following values.



Dictionary.com defines morals as:



n : motivation based on ideas of right and wrong

Ethics



Dictionary.com defines ethics as:

A theory or a system of moral values



Ethics tend to be codified into a formal system or set of rules which are explicitly adopted by a group of people. So you have Medical Ethics, Professional Ethics of Auditors etc.



Value



A value is a view of life and judgment of what is desirable



It is part of a person’s personality.



Ex. Benign attitude to labor welfare is a value which may prompt an industrialist to do much more for workers than what the labor law stipulates. We have seen its culmination in the value system that guided JRD Tata to create the toewnship Tata Nagar for its employees with housing, hospital, parks, water, electricity and guarantee of one job for next generation of the worker !



Values- individual vs organizational  values



Values are the embodiment of what an organization stands for, and should be the basis for the behavior of its members. However, what if members of the organization do not share and have not internalized the organization's values? Obviously, a disconnect between individual and organizational  values  will be dysfunctional.





Values- stated vs operating values Additionally, an organization may publish one set of values, perhaps in an effort to push forward a positive image, while the values that really guide organizational behavior are very different. When there is a disconnect between stated and operating values, it may be difficult to determine what is "acceptable." For example, two of the Army's organizational values include candor and courage. One might infer that officers are encourag ed to "have the courage of their convictions" and speak their disagreements openly. In some cases, this does work; in others it does not.

Ten motivationally distinct, broad and basic values are derived from three universal requirements of the human condition: 

needs of individuals as biological organisms,



requisites of coordinated social interaction, and



survival and welfare needs of groups.

Ten Types of Values

1. Self-Direction. Independent thought and action; choosing, creating, exploring. 2. Stimulation. Excitement, novelty, and challenge in life. 3. Hedonism. Pleasure and sensuous gratification for oneself. 4. Achievement. Personal success through demonstrating competence according to social standards. 5. Power. Social status and prestige, control or dominance over people and resources. 6. Security. Safety, harmony, and stability of society, of relationships, and of self. 7. Conformity. Restraint of actions, inclinations, and impulses likely to upset or harm others and violate social expectations or norms. 8. Benevolence. Preserving and enhancing the welfare of those with whom one is in frequent personal contact (the ‘in -group’)

9. Tradition. Respect, commitment, and acceptance of the customs and ideas that traditional culture or religion provide the self 10. Universalism. Understanding, appreciation, tolerance, and protection for the welfare of all people and for nature.





A pattern of relations of conflict and congruity among values An Example



The pursuit of achievement values may conflict with the pursuit of benevolence values - seeking success for self is likely to obstruct actions aimed at enhancing the welfare of others who need one's help. However, the pursuit of achievement values may be compatible with the pursuit of power values - seeking personal success for oneself is likely to strengthen and to be strengthened by actions aimed at enhancing one's own social position and authority over others. Formation of Values









Personal Values are imbibed from Parents, Teachers and Elders As individuals grow, values are adapted and refined in the wake of new knowledge and experiences. Within an organization Values are imparted by founder-enterpreneur or a dominant CEO , and they remain in some form , even long after the person’s exit. Ex. Formation of Values

What forges Tata group companies together ? 

J.R.D. Tata

I would call it a group of individually managed companies united by two factors : 



Part of larger group that carries name and prestige of TATAs and public recognition of honesty and reliability- Trustworthiness Another reason is metaphysical  – There is an inate loyalty , a sharing of certain belief, a pride in the fact that we are somewhat different from the other.

Jamshedji Tata

Value and Ethics 

Business ethics operate as a system of values relating business goals and techniques to meet specific human need.



A major task of leadership is to inculcate personal values and a sense of business ethics to the organizational members.



At one end values and ethics shape the corporate culture and dictate ways how politics and power will be used and at the other end clarify the social responsibility in the organization

CSR Paradox !

in order to maintain a socially responsible business model, companies should  act a manner that will benefit society . Conversely, in order to benefit society, companies should  act in a manner that benefitted themselves . Theories 

Social Contract (Donaldson, 1982; Donaldson and Dunfee, 1999)  – There is a tacit social contract between the firm and society; the contract bestows certain rights in exchange for certain responsibilities.



Stakeholder Theory (Freeman, 1984)  – Argues that it is in the company’s strategic interest to respect the interests of all its stakeholders.



CSR (Carrol, 1979)

Firms have responsibilities to societies including economic, legal, ethical and discretionary (or philanthropic).

Philanthropy to CSR 

THE 21ST CENTURY IS PROVING A BOOM TIME for philanthropy, social enterprise and corporate social responsibility (CSR). Two of the world’s richest men, Bill Gates and Warren Buffett, are vying to give away their fortunes. Innovation is blossoming in clean-tech and socially minded businesses. And companies are increasingly boosting efforts in CSR as consumers demand more ethically sourced goods.



The former Microsoft chief executive is a prime example of a corporate hero who has left the business world in order to focus on his charity work. The hope is that he can foster the efficiency of the private sector in his foundation, which focuses on global health challenges.



Percy Barnevik, The former chairman and chief executive of Swiss-Swedish engineering group ABB, and former chairman of drugs giant AstraZeneca, has switched his focus from commercial interests to poverty relief. To run Hand in Hand International, which extends small loans to poor women, including women in the Indian state of Tamil Nadu



Television, the internet, foreign travel and issues like the tsunami have opened our minds to the fact that there are huge nu mbers of people who don’t have the capacity to live like people with privileges !

CSR



C.K. Prahalad of the University of Michigan’s Ross School of Business, and Jeb Brugmann, a sustainable development specialist, highlight oil giant BP’s

arrangements with NGOs to distribute stoves in rural India and Dutch bank ABN AMRO’s collaboration on microfinance in Latin America with ACCION International, an NGO that is itself beginning to develop a multinational business. They wrote in the Harvard Business Review: “CSR started as a way for companies to gather intelligence about NGOs and manage their reputations. It has wound up providing them with the tools they need to pursue business opportunities in untapped markets.”





These corporations have recognised the business need to focus on CSR and are increasingly formalising their activity in the area. More than 3,200 have signed up to a United Nations initiative known as the Global Compact. This was launched in 2000 after then UN secretary-general Kofi Annan challenged business leaders to join an international voluntary initiative to support universal environmental and social principles. But the scheme has been criticised for having no teeth. Companies need only to sign up to ten broad principles, which many subsequently ignore.

Key Drivers: NGO Activism 

Facilitators: IT (esp Internet), media, low cost travel



Boycotts, brand damage, influence legislation, domino effect



e.g. Shell in Nigeria, Exxon in Cameroon, Sinopec in Sudan, Apparel Industry (Nike, Gap), GMO, Wood Products, etc. Key Drivers: Responsible Investment



Roots of: South Africa Apartheid Divestment



Significant size: US SRI = 2.3 trillion $ in 2005 or 10% of all professionally managed investments



Shareholder activism: shareholder resolutions; voting process



Influence corporate reporting and disclosure requirements



New rules on CSR reporting





Principles for Responsible Investment www.unpri.org Investor opinion survey (IFC) Key Drivers: Litigation



Foreign Direct Liability



Alien Tort Claims Act (ATCA): human rights, environmental rights o

Unocal Burma

o

Coca-Cola Columbia

o

Rio Tinto Papau New Guinea

o

Del Monte Guatemala

o

The Gap Saipan

o

Shell Nigeria Other tools: RICO, False Advertising

o

E.g. Saipan ‘sweatshop’ cases; Katsky v. Nike

United Nations Initiatives 

UN Global Compact



UN Principles for Responsible Investment



UNEP Equator Principles



ILO Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy (MNE Declaration)



UNHCHR Business and Human Rights



UNODC Anti-corruption



UNCTAD Corporate Responsibility Reporting, World Investment Report



Defining CSR





“The continuing commitment by business to behave ethically and contribute to economic development while improving the quality of life of the workforce, and their families, as well as of the local community and society at large.” (World Business Council for Sustainable Development, 2000) “Operating a business in a manner that meets or exceeds the ethical, legal, commercial and public expectations that society has of business”. (Business for Social Responsibility, 1998)



What is CSR

• Maximize company’s overall impact on the society and stakeholders. • More than a collection of discrete practices or occasional gestures, or

initiatives motivated by marketing, public relations or other business benefits. • approaches and attitudes differ largely due •

 – to social and economic systems



 – legal and regulatory frameworks,



 – cultural practices,



 – local societal and public needs and expectations.





CSR “A business that does not show a profit at least equal to its cost of capital is irresponsible; it wastes society ’s resources. Economic profit performance is the base without which business cannot discharge any other function, cannot be a good employer, a good citizen, a good neighbour. But economic performance is not the only responsibility of a business…Every organization must assume responsibility for its impact on employees, the environment, customers, and whomever and whatever it touches. That is social

responsibility.” •

Peter Drucker, The Daily Drucker, (HarperBusiness, New York), 2004, p 126



CSR reconciles stakeholder expectations



1.Meet customers’ legitimate needs (Marketplace)



☺ Innovate,







environment



☺ Provide



2. Meet employees’ needs (Workplace)



☺ Treat



☺ Recognize



☺ Give



☺ Provide



☺ Allow

recognizig they have choices

Provide products “fit for purpose”; safe to use and that do no harm to the

value for money; avoid rent-seeking behavior

them with respect and dignity the importance of merit and reward performance reinforcing fairness

them fulfilling jobs that build self-respect safe and pleasant working environments

appropriate work-life balance



3. Meet society’s needs (Community)



☺ Pay







☺ Protect



☺ Contribute



4. Meet shareholders’ needs



☺ Make



☺ Upgrades



☺ Capital and shareholder expectations



Summarizing CSR drivers:



What business does the company choose to



do? (30%)



• How does it go about doing that business?



(60%)



• What does it do with the money it makes?

fair share of taxes

Recognize impact of “externalities” and mitigate them

the environment and the neighborhood from degradation to society

sufficient profits to cover costs of Innovation and R&D, experiments and mistakes, product launches of plant, facilities and people



 – Build capacity (8%)



 – Do philanthropy? (2%)



UN Global Compact and Social Capital



Principle1: Businesses are asked to

support and respect the protection of international human rights within their sphere of influence; and •

Principle 2: make sure their own

corporations are not complicit in human rights abuses



Human Capital



Labour:



• Principle 3: Businesses are asked to uphold the freedom of association and the effective recognition of the right to collective bargaining;



• Principle 4: the elimination of all forms of forced and compulsory labour;



• Principle 5: the effective abolition of  child labour; and



• Principle 6: the elimination of discrimination in r espect of employment and occupation.



Natural Capital



Environment:





•Principle 7: Businesses are asked to support a precautionary approach to environmental challenges; •Principle 8: undertake initiatives to promote greater environmental responsibility; and



•Principle 9: encourage the development



and diffusion of environmentally friendly technologies.”



Human Capital



•Principle 10: "Businesses should work



against corruption in all its forms, including extortion and bribery."

CSR: In a developed country: •

•governance,



•Business ethics,



•human rights and



• Environment

In a developing country( India): •

•Focus on nation building



•Socio-economic development



•Rural development



•Employment



•Education



•Health care













•Community support

The Prince of Wales International Business Leaders Forum defines CSR on basis of four issues:  – corporate governance to include reputation, transparency, accountability, and anti corruption;  – safety and environment which comprises product/service safety, worker health and safety, local environment quality ;  – access/development that includes initiatives in education, health-HIV/AIDS, digital divide, enterprise development, and;  – Human Rights that in labour standards, security and



indigenous people.



CSR philosophies India



R Edward Freeman

Companies respond to the needs of stakeholders – customers, employees, Stakeholder communities •

Statist –J.L. Nehru



Liberal –Milton Friedman



Ethical-Voluntary commitment by



Ethical companies to public welfare- Gandhiji



Drivers of CSR







Values - a value shift has taken place within businesses where they not only feel responsibility for wealth creation but also for social and environmental goods. Strategy - being more socially and environmentally responsible is important for the strategic development of a company. Public Pressure - pressure groups, consumers, media, the state and other public bodies are pressing companies to become more socially responsible.



Corporate Benefits of CSR



Reducing risks and operating costs,





Reducing regulatory oversight by working closely w ith regulatory agencies to meet or exceed guidelines, Increased appeal to investors and financial analysts.

























Building a strong corporate reputation, image and clo ut as well as strengthen brand positioning, Attracting and retaining a motivated workforce, Building strong community relationships with o rganizations and agencies that can provide technical expertise.

Strategic Partnerships

Partnership = new development approach favoured by the multilateral and bilateral donor community, industry, public and private sector organizations. Advantages include pooling resources, building respect and understanding between potential adversaries, and transferring knowledge. Tri-sector partnerships requires business, government and civil society to pull together complementary resources.

Stakeholder Engagement Stakeholders are individuals or groups who have a vested interest in a company’s operations, who interact with a company in one or more of its activities and whose co-operation or active involvement a company needs for its ‘license to operate’.

Engagement methods include consultation papers, perception surveys, stakeholder workshops, public and private meetings, liaison groups and academic roundtables. The overall success of the engagement process will depend to a large extent on corporate communication.

Government Support

a) Mandating  - define minimum standards for business performance.

b) Facilitating - provide incentives for companies to engage with the CSR agenda. c) Partnering - act as participants, convenors or facilitators. d) Endorsing - direct recognition of the efforts of individual enterprises through award schemes or ‘honourable mentions’ in speeches by top government officials. •





Starbucks, USA

Starbucks, USA Entered into partnership with Conservation International in 1998.



































The aim was to promote the adoption of agricultural practices that are socially, environmentally and economically sustainable. Coffee and Farmer Equity Practices (C.A.F.E. Practices) offer incentives to suppliers who demonstrate independently verified performance of e nvironmental and social criteria. C.A.F.E. Practices has become a model for addressing environmental and social concerns through a company's supply chain.

Statoil, Venezuela Statoil ASA was a Norwegian petroleum company established in 1972, now part of StatoilHydro. Had negative experience involving human rights issues in several countries, including Venezuela. This prompted its subsequent selection of human rights as a core value of its business and the focus of its CSR program.

Statoil, Venezuela Partnered with the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Amnesty International to train local judges on basic human rights and the legal processes in 1999. Statoil made significant financial contributions for the training, but maintained a low profile by monitoring progress rather than trying t o control the programme. The reformed judicial system in 2001 was accompanied by new legislation with a stronger human rights focus and a new penal code. UNDP found the Venezuelan project as ‘a best -practice case’, for possible replication in other countries.

Conclusions CSR is an increasingly important part of the business environment. Companies developing and implementing their p olicies must take the socio-cultural context into consideration. CSR needs to be integrated in core business strategies and should not be seen as an add-on. CSR is not a replacement for the rightful role of d emocratic governments to set regulatory frameworks for the benefit of the society and their people.

View more...

Comments

Copyright ©2017 KUPDF Inc.
SUPPORT KUPDF