Chess Middlegame Combinations - Peter Romanovsky

July 17, 2022 | Author: Anonymous | Category: N/A
Share Embed Donate


Short Description

Download Chess Middlegame Combinations - Peter Romanovsky...

Description

 

CHESS

 

CHESS MIDDLEGAME COMBINATIONS by

Peter

Romanovsky sd fm   Rss by

Ji Ji  Ad Ad

AERI A ERICAN CAN CHE CHESS SS PR PROMO OMOTI TION ONS S Macon, Georgia, UA

 

Fr E u  1991 © pyr 1991 Arc  r A R R

ISBN 0-93929-95-3 Arc  r 3055 Gr L R c Gr 31204 vr  y R W

 

Contents

TrhaanpstleartoOr'ns eP:rW efahcaet is a Combination? C Chapte Cha pterr Two: Two: Com Combin binatio ational nal Elemen Elements ts - M Moti otives ves and The Themes mes.. Chapter Three: Aesthet hetics of Combinations. General Ideas. Chap Ch apte terr Four Four:: Idea deass and Te Techn chniq ique ue in Co Comb mbin inat atio ions ns with the "S mothered king. Chapte Cha pterr Five Five:: More More ab abou outt ae aesth stheti etics cs.. About Abo ut the the Pseudo Pseudo-Sa -Sacri crific fice. e. The Sacrifice of a Queen. Chapter Chap ter Six: Abo About ut the Th Theo eory ry of Comb Combin inat atio ions ns.. Typical Ideas Chap Ch apte terr Seve Se ven: Hi Histo story ry Game. of Co Comb mbin inat atio ions ns.. The Th e n:Immort Immo rtal al Masterpieces of theend of the 19th century.   Chapter Eight: Eight: Double Att Attack. ack. Pawn Attacks. Attacks.   Chap Ch apte terr N Nin ine: e: Po Posi siti tion onal al We Weak akne ness sses es - Mo Moti tive ve of a Combin Com binatio ation. n. Co Combi mbina natio tions ns pro provok voked ed by  weakn we akness esses es in th thee cas castle tledd po posi siti tion on..  Sacrifice  Sacr ifice of a bishop for the g3 h3 h3 g6 h6 pawns. Chap Ch apte terr Te Ten: n: The The comb combin inat atio iona nall at atta tack ck of the the two two bish bishop ops. s. Harm Ha rmon onyy of the rooks on th thee seco second nd and and seve sevent nth h rank ra nks. s. The sa sacr crif ific icee of th thee ro rook ok on g7 g7..   Chap Ch apte terr El Elev even en:: Harm Harmon onyy of rooks and and bish bishop ops. s. The theme of locked-in pieces. Chap Ch apte terr Tw Twelv elve: e: Me Meth thod odss of Inter Interce cepti ption on an andd vari variou ouss combinational ideas.   Chap Ch apte terr Thir Thirte teen en:: Ab Abou outt th thee thin thinki king ng of a ches chessp spla laye yerr during the game.

3

45  

8

13 17 23 35 52 75

97 1 16 143 160 169

 

Transl Tra nsltor tor's 's Pre Prefac face e

The present book a translation of the Russian original of 1963, forms the seco se cond nd pa part rt of Pete Peterr Ro Roma mano novs vsky ky's 's cl clas assi sicc work work on th thee midd middle legam game. e.       ,,   like its co comp mpan anio ionn vol volume ume    P,  is written with a view to helping the reader acquire a practical unders und ing middle dlegam technique quess and an ap appre preciat ciation ion of the beauty  beauty  an and d erstand aest aetanding sthet hetics icsofofmid ch ches ess. s.gamee techni Though little-known in the West Romanovsky was one of the game's independent and origina originall thin thinkers kers who gained gained great great respe respect ct in the Sov Soviet iet Unionn as a player Unio pl ayer write writerr and enthusi enthusiast astic ic teacher of the art and science of  chess. Throughout the book one is struck by the harmony of the author's thou th ough ghts ts:: th thee natu natura rall lin link of ches chesss hi hist stor oryy wit ith h th thee pres presen entt day day th thee inter-r inter -rela elati tion on of pos positi itiona onall wea weakn kness esses es and com combin binati ation onal al motiv motives es the co-o co -ope pera rati tion on of th thee piece piecess in the ca carr rryi ying ng out out of tact tactic ical al oper operat atio ions ns balance bala ncedd an andd organ organise isedd thinkin thinkingg pro proces cesses ses.. his histor toryy of th this very very importa important nt ork ork is inte interes resting ting. . The firs rstt, edition edition a sinThe single gle vol volume ume  T  T is.  .    P P fi    was published in 1929. Ten years later Romanovsky was already preparing a second edition but War broke out and the revised manuscript perished in hee sieg h siegee of Leni Lening ngra rad. d. Much Mu ch time time and and ener energy gy wa wass re requ quir ired ed fo forr Roma Romano novs vsky ky to rest restor oree his his creati cre ation on.. But this this was no nott an easy tas taskk and even a casual ccom ompa paris rison on of the the first fir st ed edit itio ionn with the prese present nt w work ork is enoug enough h to con convi vinc ncee the rea reade derr th that at we havve here in its comp ha compos osit itio ion n elu eluccid idaati tioon of them themes es and illu illust stra rati tive ve mate ma teri rial al an entir entirely ely new and origin original al piece piece of rese resear arch ch.. Afterr st Afte stud udyi ying ng Roma Romano novs vsky ky th thee re read ader er sh shou ould ld never ma make ke a move move without good reason - a positional plan or a combinational idea - ever again! Ji Jimm mmyy Ada Adams ms Lond Lo ndon on 1990 1990

 

Chapt Cha pter er On Onee What Wh at is a Co Com mbina bina on on?? It is now more than thirty years since the first edition of Middle game was pubished. For the stormy times of deveopment of chess thou th ough ghtt  this isis a ong ong peri period od.. During this time quite a few new strategica and and tactica ideas in the chess strugge have been conceived. There has been a deepening of positiona understanding. The richest shoots appea appeared red iinn the th e poughed fied of chess theory, which in many paces was competey renewed. In presenting Middl game game Com binations to the reader, the author strives to methodicay unearth combinations from positions, to reduce them to purey forma features. From the very beginning of the book it is easy to sense a very sharp rapprochement, amost a merging into a singe whoe of the eements of positiona and combinationa pay. Combinations are presented to the reader not ony and even possiby not so much m uch as a method of of operation , but mosty mo sty as a significant creative phenomenon which inevitaby accompanies it, i.e. as a natura course of events

nesses in the book is neary aways interaced with combinationa motives, and positiona tension with an increase in combinationa crises. Now a few words about terms. Many of these which the reader game Combi runs across in Middl game nations coud be appied with systematic benefit benefit aso when investigatinvestiga ting panned positiona methods of pay. As in Middlegame Combina tions, tion s, Mid Midd dlegame game Plan Planni ning ng  i kewise has its motives, ideas and themes. In chess circes ther theree sti s ti exists ex ists a division of chesspayers into positiona and combin combinatio ationa na  acco accord rd-ing to their stye of pay. Each of these "abes attached to chesspayers must oend most of a and first and foremost the chessplayer himsef, since they testi only to the organic nature of his chess abiity and thinking. One cannot carry out and prepare a combination without understanding the aws of positiona weaknesses and panning of the game, one aso cannot carry out creative pans without taking up

and not as of as a chance "hocuspocus. "hocuspocus The unity the cr c reative eativ e process process .is emphasised by the author in that the anaysis of positiona weak

combinationa without possessing keenweapons, vision and the abiity to recognise combinationa motives.

5  

Chesss Mle Ches Mlegame game Combin Combinations  ations 

uch great masters m asters of chess as W. W. teinitz, Em. E m. Lask Lasker, er, M . C higo higorin, rin, J. Zukertort, A. Rubinstein, A. Aekhine and many others (out of oviet ov iet chesspayers we name name M . Botvinnik, Bot vinnik, M . Tal, Tal, V. V . mysov, mysov, B. B. passky, indeed there are many of them) were by no means suited for the label marked positional or combinational. Neverth Ne vertheess eess stye sty e and schoo schoo in chess art whoeheartedy eists and cannot but exist. Heated arguments and discussions take pace on principa creative questions in order to create a group of ike-

You see, chess terminoogy has come from from generay accepted conc oncepts and j udgements udgements Thus a pawn is caed "backward when it is actuay eft behind, i.e. it is behind pawns of the same coour, and "passed if there are not enemy pawns on the oca  es, preventing its advance advance.. The terms "bockade, "bockade, "attack, "centre, "ank, "bow and others essentiay dier in no way from the concept that is fixed for them in the very ife and history of everyday anguage. The term "combination can hardy be ooked ook ed upon as an exception excepti on to this thi s

minded In thepersons. game, chesspayers chesspayers dis dispay pay many traits of human character. Chessplayers can play carefully, riskily, sharply, boldly, experimentay, temperamentay, cunningy, driy, prudenty, accuratey, ingeniousy, etc, etc, but to pay positionay or combinationay is not possibe, since both these eements come into the practice of

natura, terms. standard origin of chess The word combination comes from the Latin "combinatio, which stands for a definite combination of characteristic features, circumstances, which aows us to ook at combining structures as a singe whoe. It is certain arrangement of pieces and pawns which opens the

chess, repeat, with aprocess. unification into a we singe creative To remove any of these the se eements e ements from from this process means decapitating its most important and main creative part. A chesspayers imagine perfecty we having combinations in the chess strugge, but when the matter arises as to the definition of a combination then there usuay deveops a great dea d ea of fruitess ui tess and perhaps even groundess argument.

pos possib i  i ty fo for one opponents to sibi forciby andooff the comparativey quicky expoit a combination to hiss advantag hi advantagee . In ch ches esss there exists ex ists a concept caed ca ed variation variatio n , which is a chain of moves ogicay inked together by a singe pan. It is a certain combinationa arrangement of chess forces on the board which makes possibe the carrying ut of a forced forced vari variat ation ion,, eading eadi ng to the achievement of an objective and indeed to an advantage for the initiator or the instigator of the 6

 

Chess Mlega Mlegame me Com Combination bination

given varaton. Historicay, however, the matter turns out such that the concept "combination begins to reate not ony to a combinationa arrangement arran gement of of pi pieces eces  from rom which the concept arose, but to the very process of the course of the forcing variation. Instead of expoiting combinations (pieces and pawns) it is a matter of carrying out comb co mbin inat atio ions ns  i . e . forcin cingg va vari riaations,, coming out of the combinations tiona characteristics of certain positions. Combinations are transformed from a static to a dynamic

materia gain, mating the opponent, sometimes perpetua check, staemate, etc.) The broad concept of a combination, which adheres to the cassics of chess, might be experessedd by the resse th e ffoowing oowing si simpe mpe deideinition. A combination is a forced variation by means of which the initiator ini tiator of it achi achieves eves a set set aim. ai m. It woud seem that the definition appies ony to dynamic combinations (the main part of them). This, however, is not so, since the very concept of a possibe combination comes out of the static

concept. Let us concepts into one.join Thisthese givestwo us the possibiity, as aso in any other chess process, of making an independent investigation of static and dynamic combinations. It is perfecty cear that in any forcing course of the strugge, i.e. upon the carrying out of a forcing variation there is an initiator, or that of the opponents who makes

evauation of a given where characteristics and position, features giving giv ing it i t a combinationa character character are incuded. Centuriesod combinationa practice has aowed the discovery of tens and hundreds of combinationa features in positons. These open the way to a study of phenomeda me da,, characteris characteristic tic for the combinationa strugge, which usuay

the irst move of a combination, cacuating the achievement of an objective which brings him an advantag adva ntagee ( improvi improvinng his position, positi on,

attend i t. are it. Thedevoted principatochapte cahapters rs of of the book study these phenomena.

7

 

Chapter Chap ter Two Two Comb Co mbin inat atio iona nall El Elem emen ents ts  o ove vess an and d Th Them emes es Combinations display various degrees of of diic diicul ulty ty in their the ir execuexe cution: they can be short, short, si simple mple and and obvious, logically arising from the planned process of the truggle. They Th ey can can also a lso be very compi com picat cated, ed, many moves, with branching variations, surprising moves which are diicul diicultt to calculate calc ulate and escaping even ingenious imagination. Not only in the process of play itself, but even in analysis, combinational decisions at times escape the attention of very strong strong authoauth orities. We give an exampe of such mistaken analysis. In the game P u Taasch, from the international touament at Nberg 189, the following position was reached after White's 19th move Rxc3 (knight) 

Bac B ackk shoud shoud now continu continuee 19 . . .

Nxe4 20 Qxe4 f5! and only then exchange on c3, which would give him the possibility of staunch However, Tarrasch defence. played at once 19 Rxc3, not seeing any other way for White besides 20 bxc3. But Pillsbury surpris sur prisingly ingly replied 20 +. In hiss commenta hi commentary ry at this th is point point,, TarTarraschh gave Pills rasc Pill s bury's move a question mark, just as as his next move (20 ... Bxf). He recommended men ded taking the knight with the pawn, 20 ... gxf, maintaining that in this case Black would win the game. As proof, amongst other ines, Tarras Tarrasch ch provided this analytical variation: 20 ... gxf 21 Qg4 + Kf8 ( not 2 1 . . . Kh Kh88 in view of 22 Qe4) 22 QhS Ba4 with advantage to Black. Bla ck. However Tarrasch did not notice that after 21 Qg4+ Kf8 22 Bh7 he is mated (22 . . . Bd 23 Bxf Bxf ) . Thus Thus Pillsbur Pillsbury's y's move 20 Nxf Nxf + ! turns out to be be the begi beginnin nningg of an ecell ecellent ent combination, but one which was not noticed by Tarrasch ei ther in the game or in subsequent analysis. Andd here An her e is another another case, where where •••

did not notice athe world simplechampion combination. The diagram features a position, after the 25th move, from the game

8  

Chess Mdegame Mdegame Coma Comao o

Aekhine  Eue in their retu

match fo for the world championshi champions hip, p, 1 93 7 .

There follo ol loed ed 22 Bb2 , whereas by by means of the simple combination 26 Qh8+ h8 would 2 Nx Nxhave  + and 28 Nxe5 White ob-

ained an easily ained ea sily winning endgame. Also on the following move the opponents did not notice this combinati bin ation, on, co cont ntinu inuing ing 2 . . . Bc ? 27 a3? Only now, by defending the queenn by 27 quee 27 . . . Bd, Bd, did Euwe Euwe preprevent the threat. Thes Th esee exampl examples es  of which which we cold co ld give giv e many more, more, we present present mainly in order to draw attention o the importance of combinaional air, air, i . e . caref careful ul attention attention to to hose ho se features features of the positon posi ton oonn the boardd which incie boar inc ie ideas ideas and and imagination in the search for combinaions. The features of positions, which are characterised characterised by certain combinational condit conditions, ions, i t is most most convenient o call the motives motiv es of combinations. In the combination which failed to take place in the game AlekhineEuwe, he main

combinational motive (the it moti is the undefended Black queenn on e5 quee e 5 . As soon soon as as Euwe defended his bishop, this motive disappeared and the t he combination combination became impossible.  course the position posi tion of the White Whi te knight on g5 also played played it own role as a supplesupple mentary motive, as did the queen Both these pieces occupied attacking positons close by the rathe exposed position posit ion of the Black king Thee unde Th undefen fended ded p iece, iece , as shown by an analysis of numerous combinational processes, is one of the important motives, which stimulate the combinations tions. . Theappearance basis of thisof motive moti ve consists of the opening of a possibility for the inti in tiator ator of the combination combinatio n to carry carryout a double attack attack , ei the on two undefe undefende ndedd peces pec es or on an undefended piece with a simultaneous check check to the t he king. Precisely Pr ecisely thi thiss mght also have occured in the th e moment we looked at above from the game, AlekhineEuwe, after 2 Qh+ Kxh 27 Nxf7+. The his h istory tory of chess knows many combinatons on the theme of double attack; this theme is also widely encountered today Here we come close to yet another concept, essential for an investigation of the combinational pocess, which we characterise as the theme of a combination. If the motive can be called a stimulus or a combnation, then the theme of a combination is its

9  

Chesss Mleg Ches Mlegme me Comb Combinations  inations 

finale, i.e. the concluding position, which realises the combinational idea. The theme, as it were, sums u th e whole combination an andd brings brings out the reuslt reus lt of i t . We look at a few more examples on the theme of double attack with the motive of unde un defe fend nded ed pieces, i  e . their placement on undefended squares. The diagram position is from the game anoskiMieses (Prague 1908) after White's 21st move Rac.

White. 22 Kgl f4

Now this attack is deadly an leads to new combinations. 23 Rc2 g3 24 g3 Bxg3

Also this combination has the theme of double attack after 2 hxg3 Qxg3 Qxg3 + , when when the the White knight falls under attack at the same time as the check 25 Rfl Ng5!

Black could now maintain the initiative tiat ive by 2 . . . f4, but by exploitexploiting the unefene hite queen on d3, decisively he finds aincreasing combinational means of te attack.

A beautiful concluding combination on the theme of simultaneous double attack. attack. The motive is j ust the same: sam e: the undef undefen ende dedd state of the White queen on d3. On 2 N xg5 xg5 ffollo ollows ws attack 2  . . Bon xh2the + White with with a simultaneous

2 1 ... Q Qh h3 + !

queen.

A splendid combination on the theme of double attack. If White were to go halfway to meeting the opponent, and this, incidentally, was probably the best, then, after 22 Kxh3 Nx+ 23 Kg2 Nxd3 24 Rxe Nxc 25 Bxc Rde8, he also could not save the game in view of the material loss. Janowski's refusal to go into this forcing variation leads to an even quicker defeat for

26 hxg3 Qxg3 + 2 Rg2 Nxf3 + 28 RxO Qxf3 29 Qx Rx and White continued the struggle without any foundation and res  igned on the 45th move. ueen's Gambit

White: G.Friedstein Black: V.mysov

(22nd Moscow Championship 1944)

1 d4 N 2 Nf3 Nf3 d5 3 c4 c6 4 Nc3

10  

Chess Mleg Mlegame ame Combina Combinatio tio

dxc4 S e3 bS 6 a4   Na e6 8 Bxc4 Be 9 00 00 10 Q Qee2 B Bb b 1 1 Rd Rd  a 12 Bd2 Nbd bd 13 N Ncc  Qb6 14 NdJ cS S NdeS NxeS 16 NxeS Rad8 1 BbS

White gives up the d4 pawn, in exchange for the a pawn. This idea, owever, runs up against a combinational ref refutat utation. ion. 1 ... cxd4 18 exd4 Qxd4 19 Nc4 QdS 20 Qf QhS

process of the combination itself. In the field of vision should be discovered not only the presence of motives, but also the possibility of creating them in the course of the struggle. 24 Kh Qxd2 2S Qe2 Q4

Materia lly,, Black has gained Materially gained nothing, but he has succeeded in wrecking the covering cov ering detachment around the th e enemy king and created here a number of weak points, as, for example, the f3 pawn and particularly the h2 point, on which Black threaten threatenss to come down with wi th a dang dangero erous us attack by . . . Bd Bd. . 26 Nc4 Rc8 Qc 2 Rd Ne3 b3 29 Ng2 30 RS Ne328g6 31 Qd3 Q4 32 Ng2 Q 33 Ne3 Qh4 34 a RhS 3S Nf Qxf2 and White soon resigned.

2 1 Nxa S

A natural desire to compensate for the loss he has suered. White could not "lag behind in taking the pawn. On 21 Be3 could follow 21 ... Ng4, on 21 B4 NdS. The position of the White king has become generally shaky. Amogst other things, the manoeuvre Rd4h4 etc. is threatened. 21

•

Bf3!

An  "awkward move, move , with wit h which begins a combination on the already known t us theme of double attack. 22 gxO Rxd2! 23 Rxd2 QgS+

As distinct from the previous examples, here the motive of undefended pieces was created in the

And so the result of a cobination might be, and frequently is, not the obtaining of a material advantage, but simply the improvement of one's posi positition, on, the creation of weaknesses in the opponent's camp, the achievement of an and attacking formation of pieces other positional gains. The theme of double attack is also a characteristic of many comb inations inat ions on the endgame. endgame. We find find a very refined example of this in a wellknown study by aavedra. A combinational motive is created by the faradvanced White pawn, and, though at first sight it appearss strange, appear strange, the th e po posi sition tion of the Black king in the corner. corner. It is absolutely clear that Black must endea

  

Ches Ch esss M leg legameComb ameComba ati tion ons  s 

vour to give up the rook for the pawn. The first move of the combination, as also Black's reply, is obvious.

Rd4+ 4 Kc3 Rdl 5 Kc2 Rd4!

Intending after  c8(Q) to achieve a dr draw aw by  . . . Rc4 Rc4 + 7 Qxc4 stalemate. 6 c8(R)! Ra4  Kb3!

The theme of the combination is the double attack on a4 and c. Black mates in a few moves.

1 c

is intere interesti sting ng on to note thatcould with theI t Black king b he achieve a draw without diiculty, both by checking the the rook, 1 . . . Rd+ Rd+ 2 KbS RdS RdS + etc. etc. and and alsoo by playing als playing simply 1 . . . Rd Rd22 followed by checks on the b2 and a2 squares. 1



Rd6+ 2 Kb5 Rd5+ 3 Kb4

In the following chapters we become acquainted with further various combinational motives and plans. We will come across these elements of combination throughout the whole book. eforehand, it is necessary to makehowever, a deep excursion into the region of the internal content of combinations; this reveals to us a far more important stimulus in combinational creativity than purely theoretical prerequisites in the form of combinational motives.

12  

Chapte Chap terr Th Thre reee Aest Ae sthe hec css of Co Comb mbina inao ons. ns. Ge Gene nera rall Id Idea eas.  s.  Any higher expression of harmony makes a deep aesthetic impr i mpression. ession. t excites, creates ideas about the beautiful. Combinations in chess art ar t reprerepresent a higher expression of harmony of chess for forces. Even combicombi nations simple in structure are in themselves aesthetically already one in that all the init in itiator's iator's piece pi ecess operating in them pour out their strength together, harmoniously conducting a combinative theme. The aesthetics of combinations are expressed also in methods of operation. Here, first and foremost, is advanced the concept of sacriices. In what lies the aesthetics of sacrii sacriices ces?? As is well known, from the very first steps we teach

ground of a careful regard even for the weakest chess unit. And if several pieces or a strong piece (for example, the queen, rook) are sacriiced, then the contrast is redoubled. eemingly absurd, reckless moves suddenly tu out to be strong ideas, instruments of triumph, victory. The outwardly weak  thanks thanks to to hidden hidden meaning, meaning, triumphs over strength. Adroitness, ingenuity, imagination, comes forth from the winner in a struggle against an opponent's more powerful armaments. In this lies the individual beauty of the sacrifice. The sacrifice will often be surprising, and this suddenness upsets the usual humdrum ideas

the beginnerenthusiast to have careful regard for material. Wea give, as an instructive example, the case when, after losing a minor piece, the master resigns the game, game, considering further further resistance to be fruitless. Even an extra awn, just one pawn, frequently gives the possessor of it an easy victory. Therefore a voluntary giving up of a pawn pawn or piece, pi ece, or an exchange of

about thetakes course the the stugg st uggle le anda likewise theofspectator into world of magic adventure. There is even an extensive, separate terminology, characterising the aesthetics of chess combination. There arise the concepts of refined and even graceful combinations, productions of rare beauty, immortal ideas, smooth mates, elegant finishes, inis hes, etc. etc . As far back back as the last

a stronger p iece forfor onerook less or sstro trong, ng, for examplepiece queen rook for kni knight ght etc.  is an event event which which contrasts with the strict back

century specialawarded prizes forin beautiful games were tournaments. In chess literature there are a

13  

Chesss Mleg Ches Mlegame ame Comb Combiations  iations 

number of articles and special works, showing aesthetic chess combinations. We point to the work of professor professor of li terature. teratu re. A. A. miov, "Beauty in the Chess Game, the book by V. I. Volkenstein, dramatisttheoretician, "Experience of Contemporary Contemporary AestheAe sthetics, where we find a special chapter showin showing chess play. In the t he handbook of Emanuel Lasker, world champion for many years, there is a special specia l chapter under the the heading "Aesthetics of Chess Play. We give giv e a fe few exampl exa mples es of beaubea uty in chess combinations. with an ilustration from We the begin endgame, where the simplicity and normal norm ality ity of the situation si tuation wil contrast particuarly boldly with the surpsg incursion into the str st ruggle of of combinations. This circumstance must undoubtedly make a great aesthetic impression upon us. It seems, in a simple position, highy artisti art isticc ideas suddenly spring up before us. Here is a position from the game Psbu Psbu Gunsbe (International tournament at Hastings 1895)

Let u s see how originally originally and interestingy a combination developed in it: 28 N

Already this thi s move obiges obiges Black to be caref carefuu l . You see, afte afterr the text move, Black Black could could reply reply 28 . . . a and White's Whit e's knight knight has to t o retreat. retreat. In addi addition tion to this, does does Black Blac k have anything ese at his dis d ispos posal al ? On 28 . . . exf5 follow ol lowss 29 gxf gxf5 and then 30 Nxd55 + . On 28 . . . Kd Nxd Kd7, 7, simp simpes estt iiss 29 fxe+ fxe+ Kxe Kxe 30 c c Kd 3 1 c7 Kxc7 32 Nxd5+ and Nxf. Thus Black has no choice. 28

•••

a5 29 c6!!

The beginning a long nation, in which asofthe main mai ncombitheme theme serves the double threat of the pawn  an original aspect aspect of double attack.

29 ... Kd Kd6 6

But right now it seems seems the knight knig ht must step back. 30 e6!

A nail, which is the basis of a combinational idea. 30

•••

Nxc6

Black has nothing else, a situation that often ccurs during the course of a briliant and unusual combination. Even two moves ago ago it ooked ike a quiet knight ending w ith some som e position posi tiona a advantage advantage ffor or White. Now, however, the two White pawns burst into the th rank, ra nk, whie the the knig knight ht  his his las lastt pi piece ece  White Whi te o oers for sacrifice. sacrifice. For what and why does Black decline decli ne to accept the sacrifice sacrifice?? The reply to this is given by the folow folow

14  

Chess Mdleg Mdlegame ame Combiat Combiations  ions 

ing possib possibee continuat continuation: ion: 3300 . . . axb4 ax b4 3 1 e7 Kxe7 Kxe7 3 2 c7 and and the the White pawn goes on to queen, since Back has no defence against the two two threat threatss cxb7 or c8(Q c8 (Q ) . An origina ori gina aspect aspect of the doube doub e attack of a pawn! 3 1 Nxc xc6 6 Kxc6 Kxc6 3 2 e4! dx dxe4 e4 3 3 d5+

f the first theme in al the combinations is the "doube attack with the pawn, then the second is the formation of two connected passed pawns, which have already crossed the frontier. 33

000

Kd6 34 Ke3 b4 35 Kxe4

a4White 36 Kd4 hurries to hod up the

Back pawn and this aso decides the outcome of the strugge. His contemporaries considered this combinationa miniature of Pilsbury to be one o ne of the most ref refined, in fact the most refined production of the Hastings touament. And indeed so it is. A combination refined in its suddeness, originaity of theme, rarey met in practice, simpi sim picity city of materia taking part part in it, a beautifu sacriice of a single piece and the overal beauty of al the ideas. Two pawns, standing amost side by side, without piece support, putting up resistance to the kin ki ng and knight, knight , i. e. pieces which are considerably stronger. In the next diagram we see a study by Reti. White to play and draw. At first first sight, sigh t, the study ooks ooks ike nonsense.

The White Whi te pawn on f is nneutr eutraaised, whereas no way can the Black pawn be overtaken by the White king. uch an obvious state of aairs. But in the present case the obvious is not thecarries truth. out As aa matter of fact, White combination with two themes. One of o f them illustrate illustratess the succes successsfu pursuit of the Back pawn by the White king, and the other  the queening of his own pawn, despitee the despit the reiab re iable le guarding guarding rol rolee of of the Back king. The combination dvelops like this: 1 Kb7 a4 2 Kc6

Now No w if 2 . . . a3 , then then 3 Kd Kd a2 a2 4

  Kg7 5 Ke7 and White also

queens. 2

00 0

3

00 000 0

Kg6 3 Kd5!!

A move with two threats! The king enters into the square of the a apawn pawn and defen defends ds his own passed passe d pawn. a3 4 Ke6 a2 5  draw

The nevertobeforgotten A. A. Troitsky composed many combinational classic endgame studies. We give giv e one of these these , which makes a most aesthetic impression.

15  

Chess Mdleg Mdlegame ame Combia Combiations  tions 

The combination leading to the win is constructed on the sixfold repetition of the theme of double attack, but this is not al.

The beau beauty ty of th e st stud udyy lies in thethe extremey sparing movements of rook from the start and then on its retu jouey along the same path, and that this "sloth, stingy in its movements, has at the same time ti me a crushing e eect ect:: 1 Rb4! Qc8 2 Rb8 Qh3 3 Rh8 Nh4 4 Rxh4 Qc8 5 Rh8 Qb7 6 Rb8,

and Black inaly loses the stubborny escaping queen. Aso artistic ist ic is the construction of the rook manoeuvre: 1 Rb8h8xh4h8b8. Looking at the inuence of

creative moves in the chess game for the spectator, Em. Lasker said, "The spectator takes pleasure not only in the outward side of the chess game but aso in its story, its drama. It does matt that and the chessboard chessbo ard serves servenot s asmatter the er scene, the actors are represented by chess pieces. If it were a drama of chessplaye chess players rs unfold unfolding ing on the scene of a theatre, theatre , it might m ight not produce a very deep impression, but with the indispensable conditions conditions that exist exi st on the board, the spectator feels interested intere sted and understa understands nds i t.  Nott all No al l combinations combinat ions produce produce an equal aesthetic impr Combinations ca n be impression. can more moreession. beautiful beautif ul and and less beautiful. A rough outward cover (form) might not be in accord with wi th a i ine ne idea (content) . At the basis basi s of a combinati combination on are always combined two important crea cr eati tive ve meth method odss  dynami dynamicc and and harmonious. This united action leads to the production of creati creative ve forms, the the artist a rtistic ic content of of whi which ch also makes up, in the main, an aesthetic combination.

1  

Chapter Chapt er Fo Four  ur  Idea Id eass an and d Te Tech chni niqu que e in Co Comb mbin ina aon onss with wit h th the e " "mo moth ther ered ed King King.  .  The concept of motives and themes can probaby be related to theoretic theor etical al concepts. concepts. Undoubtedly quite a ot of creative accent fals on them, but a a  the same no no more more than an accent. Meanwhile the aesth ae sthetic etic  this this esse essentially ntially is the the sum of artistic creative forms, impresses itsef upon the thoughts and feel elii ngs of of man. It is i s clear that in combinations, which appear as one of the basic sources of artistic creation in chess, apart from motives and themes there exists a further kind of eement, containing exacty that c reative eati ve oas oas where harmony of operation is perfected and its dynamic and intended, of course, concrete me-

tiona process, alowing an artistic path for al a l the pangs and doubts of an artist. The next diagram position was reached on the 27th move of an exhibition game, Bestein Capabanca (Moscow, anuary 194).

thod takesfrom shape,anwhich conveys thoughts approximate andma an dmark rk  a motive, to a cearly cearly outlined outlin ed objective objective  a the theme. me. The method which heps us to seek a basic motive and achieve a theme represents a conrete intention, in other words an idea. Idea! This is what, consequenty, is the main product of creative imagination in the thoughts thoughts of man. This is where

White's postonis isunder unsatisfactory. His knight attack and if it retreats to a3 or d4, Black consolidates his passed faradva ad vanc nced ed pawn by . . . Rdc8 (w ith the thr threa eatt . . . N b4 ) , and Wh White ite cannot hold on for long under the very strong pressure. It is natural that White does not see any other way out apart from taking the dangerous paw, the more so that

a storehouse aesthetic vaues is conceaed andof humdrum, accrued sma advantages become transformed into a dashing combina

it is defended attacked by three times and onlyhim twice by Black pieces. Moreover, into his thoughts

17  

Chess Mdleg Mdlegame ame Com Combatio bations  ns 

looms he looms he variation 2 7 N Nxc3 xc3 Nxc3 28 Rxc3 Rxc3 29 Rxc3 Qb1 + 30 Qf1 Qxa2, which, taking into account the material equality, gives him good chances of a draw.

movement restricted by its pawns. However, it shoud not be thou th ough ghtt that that th the moti motive ve  the the lockedin loc kedin position position of the king king  by itself testiies to the combinational

Up to a certain point game proceeded according to the above variation. It coninued ike this:

nature of the position. One of superfi fici cial al structural arran arrangement gement pi pieeces and pawns is a ong way from being suicient for such a conclusion. O cour course se,, to a certain certain extent, extent , thee thoughts of a chess ayer spurn th spu rn structura features in search of a combinational decision, but only spu, not more. more. One and the same position of the king (for example, ocked ocke din in,, as in the example looked looked

27 Nxc Nxc33 Nxc3 28 Rxc3 Rxc3 Rxc3 229 9 Rxc3

Now, however, folows not 29 . . . Q b 1 + , b u t 29 ... Qb2!! This double attack on the rook and queen leads immediately to a win, since White now loses a rook. Indeed, dee d, on 30 Qe 1 follows 30 Qxc3, while on 30 Rc2, 30 ... Qb1+. I t is not diicult to see that the possibility of carrying out the theme of doube attack is based on the t he unfortunate position of the White king, which has no ight squares after the the threatened threate ned invasion of the Black Bl ack rook. f White had made the move h3 or g3 , then Back's combination would have not been possible. Thus the main motive of the combination is the lockedin position of the White king, its

at) couldit also beaso a combinational motive, might not be. This depends on the creative tension of the position, positio n, on a number of details characterising this tension. Exposing the position posi tion of the k ing also might migh t serve as as a combinational motive,, but ony in that case when, motive when, alth al though ough only potential potentially, ly, the king could be made an object of attack. In the majority of endgames, only in rare cases can the open position posit ion of the king be seen as a combinational motive. ummarising, it is possibe possibe to say that the characteristic character istic features of a position can ony acquire the significance of a combinational motive when this feature is accopanied by other circumstances, which in total are able to produce serious creative potential. Returning to the combination in the game BernsteinCapablanca, we point to the additional circumstance which

18  

Chess Mdlegam Mdlegamee Comba Combations  tions 

aows the ockedi ockedi n position of the White king (incidentay Black's is aso restricted!) to be seen as  combinationa motive. This circumstance is the presence on the

creative connection connection with w ith ideas and to a considerable extent promotes the correct impementation of them (in the given positional circumstances!! ) cumstances

board of heavy and serve open ies, which mightpieces obviousy as paths for the penetration of the Back queen and rook to the first rank. What, however, is the idea of Capabanca's combination, i.e. what task did he set himself, by sacriicing the main trump of his positiona pressure, the pawn on c3? O course Black's idea is the

We ideas: ist a number tiona removal of of combinaa barrier (obstace), blockading, pinning (pieces), intercepting (lines on which pieces are moving), defection of pieces from defensive funct ions, decoying of of pi pieeces to squares marked for attack, and others. Al these methods ar so cosey connected with the creative, planned side of combination combinat ion,, in other words

penetration of the andsuch rooka to the first rank. In queen order for penetration to become possibe, it is necessary to defect the White rook and quee q ueenn from from defence defence of the d 1 and b 1 points. He manages m anages to defect the rok by the sacrifice of the pawn on c3, and the queen by carryi car rying ng out out the the powerful powerful them themee . . . Qb2. Here it shoud be noted that the theme in the present combination turns out to be in an unusua and beautiful form, and, as it were, owing into a basic creative pan  an idea. The reaisation of an idea often requires great imagination, thee app th appication ication o f many methods, which in tota make up the technica side of fulfiing a plan. As aso in any business, business, technique has has

with the idea it rests rest s upon, even possibe, if we wantthat to, ittois attempt to classi combinational ideas. The technical method, you see, aso contains its own sort of plan, the details of the general idea, whic wh ichh as a whole is characteris characterised ed by a combination. Thus it is not possibe to divorce the technique of a combination frm its creative side, to give it secondary importance. The importance of technique in combinational creatvty is so great, that only upon the correct and wetimed application of its methods can creative thought in combination ind its fu expression. One soveny method might make a correcty conceived plan

paramount methods importance Technica mightinat chess. times be very compicated The technique of combinations has a direct

impossible. To conclude the th e present present chapter we dwe on one brill iant combinacombinationa idea, ide a, a combination where as

19  

Chess Che ss Mlegam Mlegamee Com Comba batio tions  ns 

the theme we come across none other than the downfall of a king, "smothered by its own comrades. Essentiall Es sentiallyy we discuss an idea close to the one we have just j ust looked at of the mate of aThis king,idea locked b its own pawns. hasinpased along a great historical path and apparently entered entered into into the histor his toryy of combinations as long ago as the time of Greco (1600634). The question here is of a king getting mated as a consequence of the fact that the surrounding pieces and pawns (of the same colour), totally deprive it of the possibil possib ility ity of moving.In an instructive game, presented in his "elfTeacher, chiers, without indicating the names of the opponents, demonstrated this mate in the following form.

 e4 e5 2 d4 c5 3 dxc5

Black's pawn sacrifice is unfounded, and White can quietly take the pawn 3 Bxc5 4 N Non  Ne5. f6 5 Bc4 0  0 6 •• •

Nxe5 Nxe4  Qd5 Nxf2  Nx Qh4 9 Nh6+ Kh 10 +

Rxg   N mat mate

uch a mate with the rook (o knight) and pawns locking in t king is called smothered mate. From Greco we find the follw ing example smothered i the nale ofof one of themate game variations given in his manucripts.

15 ... Nf2+ 16 Ke Nd3+ 1 Kd  Qe  +   Nxe Nxe  Nf2 mate mate

Here the White king is bricked up with two pawns pawns and and three minor mi nor pieces. I t is not diicult diicult to see see that tha t there is much in common between the ideas of both the combination and the technique techniq ue of of carryi carrying ng it out. At the basis of the combination lies two checks with the queen and knight, in the first case by Nh6+, in the the second by Nd3 + . The The idea of the combination is reected in the sacrifice sacrifice of the queen, made in order to blockade, to make inaccessible to which the kingthe might mighlast t stilsquare move ( in compositions, composit ions, such an idea is caled cal ed the brickedup king).

20  

Chess Mdl Mdlegame egame Combia Combiation tions  s 

The smothered mate is met in games also as a threat that might even bring to the active side (the initiator) a decisive achievement. Out of several casual games with the idea such a mate, which the we have at our ouofr disposal, disposal , we present following example.

There followed 2 0 Nd6! On 20 . . . Bxg2, there there isis obviously obviously the inevitable smothered mate after 2 1 Qa2+ . Naturally Black prefers to suer •

In this pon, where White has a small advantage, the struggle might still go on for a long time, were it not for a combinational possibility, connected with the idea of smothered mate which White has at his disposal here. There followed 24 Nd6! and Back resigned, since he suers new ne w material material loss loss ater ater 24 24 . . . cxd6 cxd6 25 Bxd5 + etc. The main di dirrection ection,, however, ho wever, of the combination lies l ies in in 25 . . . Bxg2 ( other otherwis wisee he cann cannot ot avoid serious material loss) 26 Qa2 + Kh8 27 Nf Nf + Kg8 Kg8 28 N h6 + Kh8 29 Qg8+ Rxg8 30 Nf7 mate. A complicated was carried out incombination the game RomanovskyBotvinnik played Romanovsky at Leningrad in 1927.

material loss, cxd6 byd6replying Bb 3 2 1 Qc1 cx 22 Bxc6 Bxc620Re6 Re6 23 cxd6 etc. Morphy also succeeded in twice gi giving ving smothered mate to to his hi s opponents nen ts  these these game gamess are are gen gener erally ally well known and have appeared in many publications. A l l that tha t remains for for us is to say a few more words about the idea of a combination ending in smothered mate. It consists of bringing the enemy king into a state of total immobility, due to the close encirclement of its own pieces and pawns. To carry out this idea, which is the result of a joint (harmonious) attack of the queen and knight, knight , the following operation is necessary and obligatory: a diagonal check wi th theand queen, queen , double double heck with wi tha queen knight, andccheck finally queen sacrifice leading to a total locking in of the king with pieces

21  

Chess Che ss Md Mdleg legame ame Com Combin binati ations  ons 

o its ow ownn colo colour ur.. A Ate terr th this is th thee knight gives mate on the critical square, upon which it appears or the second time. Today this combination is more o purely hi hist stor oric ical al si sign gni iic icanc ance, e,

but, irrespe but, irrespectiv ctivee o this, this, its artis artistry try,, the quee queenn sacr sacrii iice ce,, an andd outw outwar ardd structure o mate, even now makes a great eat aest aesthe heti ticc impr impres essi sioon on chess enthusiasts.

22  

Chapter Chapt er Fi Fiv ve ore o re abo about ut Ae Aest sthe heti tics cs.. Ab Abou outt the ps pseu eudo dosa sacr cri ice ce. .  The sacri ri ce of a Queen undefended square cannot be taken, interest is aroused for the whole creative production. You see, also the pseudosacrifice, which like the sacrice is an active oensive operation, is needed in accordance accor dance w ith the th e combinat combinational ional conditions.

Already in the previous chapters, we have touched upon the subject of sacrifice sacrifice,, as upon the element elem ent of aesthetics aes thetics in i n chess art. As we have already explained above, we call a voluntary giving up of material, pawns, pieces, etc, with the aim of carrying out a combinational plan, a sacrifice. Other sacrifices can be called pseudosacrifices where, after one, two, three moves, the sacrificed material is recovered with interest and the sacrificer himself achieves a material material advantage. advantage. Also possible possible is the kind of sacrifice as was feature tu redd above above in i n t he game, game , Bernste Bernstein in Capablanca. The queen is placed under attack, but it cannot be

rence Thus, between essentially, the pseudosacrifice the great dieand the sacrifice is diicult to perceiv. trictly speaking, the preix "pseudo can be added to almost any sacrifice sacrifice,, since si nce as as the end end resul resultt of the combination its initiator achieves (or a denite combination should achieve by itself) an advantage. The strength of the aesthetic influence of a sacriice is deter-

taken because of the mate inwhich would follow immediately this case. uch a "sacrifice can still quite rightly be called a pseudosacrifice sacrif ice,, but also a pseudosacrifice pseudosacrifice in no way lacks beauty. In it, also, the usual notions of the possibility and the allowance of this or that move are sharply and surprisingly disregarded. The irst impression about the pseudosacrice is the same as an "oversight (the socalled unnoticed threat). When, however, it is "explained that the

minedquestioning not so much theto argument the by right quai a giving up of material as a sacrifice, as by a number of other creative considerations, asg around the sacrifice (or pseudosacrifice). In both this and the other case occurs a sudden break with generally accepted, habitual notions and one of these circumstances is already suiient for  aesthetic perception of the occurring events. For the dierent degrees of aes-

thetic inuence, of vital impor

piece placed under threat on an 23  

Ches Ch esss M le lega game me Comb Combi iat ation ions  s 

tance are a number o circumstances, conceing not only the fact itself of the sacrifice (or pseudosacrifice) sacrif ice) but as a soo the interrelation in terrelation of the sacriici sacriicial al idea with the who-

pawn, minor piece, rook, several pieces (see, for example, below in Chapter 8, the game AnderssenKieseritsky), while it is also possible to sacrifice the queen,

le compositon com positon combinati Let us point outofathe fewcombination. of these: on. for example, the important moment when the sacrifice was oered oered.. This might occur occur ei ther at the beginning or in the midde m idde or end end of the combination. In the game BesteinCapabanca, the inal pseudosacrifice sacrif ice,, expressed by the move 29 . . . Qb2 ! found ound an almost almost uunan nani-imous response with commentator comm entators.s.

wh whic h is the the most mo st powerfu pow erfull piece piec e of theich operating chess forces. Therefore precisely the sacrifice of the queen or the pseudosacrifice of it often makes a particularly strong impression. Let us look lo ok at a fe few combina comb inations tions with such a sacrifice.

"An wrote eective concluding blow! they in their comments to this game. The aesthetic in this pseudosacrifice consists consis ts of fou fourr circi rcumstances: its construction of beauty, the fact that it is not obvious and therefore surrising in thatt it tha i t was foreseen foreseen "from "from afar afar,, and finally, its power and iresistibility, which evoked an immediate capitulation by t he oppon opponent. ent. No less, and even greater eect can be produced by a sacriice at the start of some multimove combination, where it will be diicut to quickly determine the correctness of the sacrifice and where the struggle goes on sometimes for a rather long time in unequal materia conditions, but with victory being gained, nevertheless, by the

The diagram poston is from Kotov Koto v Bondavsky Bonda vsky,, played in the AllUnion tournament in memory of avitsky (Leningrad 1936). It is unusual. The game has reached the 21st move but still no pieces have been exchanged. Black' Bl ack'ss queen's ank an k is "fr "frozen ozen and and twoo ooff his pieces  th tw thee rook rook and and bishop bish op  are inactive. inactive. The The othe otherr Black rook on d4 is tangled up amongst the opponent's opponent's pieces and must obviously perish in the small

sideTh with The e thi t hirthe rd thing thlesser ing westrength. want to mention is about the scale of the sacrifice. It is possibe to sacrifice a

cage which it findsposi wouldinseem that Black's poitself. sition tion isIt unenviable, but White's king is in an extremely precarious position

24  

Chess Che ss M le legam gamee Com Comba bat t

which creates a motive for all sorts of combinations. Black threatens not only a discovered and double c h ec k  . . . Ne4 Ne 4 + , but al also sim simpp ly to take the knight on e5. White thereforeto has He is forced take no the choice. rook. Thus: 22 Bxd4 Ne4+ 23 Ke3

This leads to mate, since Black has availabe a beautiful combination with a queen sacrifice. But also the retreat to f was not very comforting. On 23 Kf there might follow 23 ... Bxe5 24 Bxe5 Nxe5 25 fxe4 Ng4 Ng4 with the threa threats ts of . . . Ne3+ and ... Nh2 mate. Also the move 24 N xe5 would lead to an advantage for Back in this variation. Then 24 ... Ng3+ 25 K Qxd4+ Qxd4 + 26 Kxg3 Kxg3 N xe5 etc with wit h the better chances. 23

000

f4+!

This check solves two problems: it blocks the f4 square and deects the knight away from the f2 square.

board, even though a t the moment moment of mate White holds a great material advntage. 26 Kxd4 Bc5+ 2 Kd3 Nxe5 mate

The idea of thethecombination consists of enticing White king into a mating net. The queen sacrifice was a decisive factor in this operation. In the game, Bestein Capablanca the queen sacrifice is the apotheosis apotheosis of the combination. In the game, KotovBondarevsky, the queen sacrifice forced a final mate in 3 moves. In the next examp a sacrifice is made in the opening itself. The combin com bination ation coming comi ng out out of it looks most spectacular since from the sacrifice to the moment of the demonstration of the theme still lies a long path. However, just as in the game KotovBondarevsky, the idea of the combination consists of luring the king into open

24 Nxf4 Qf2+ 25 Kd3

space, into a mating net.

25

000

Qxd4+!!

Three minor pieces mate the

The diagram position is from the game Averbach AverbachKotov (Interna-

White king in the middle of the

tiona tournament for Candidates, 25

 

Chess Che ss Ml Mlega egame me Comb Combat atns  ns 

Zrich 1953). Black's d6e5f4 pawn chain has a highly cramping eect upon the activity of the White pieces. The White king is precariously pre cariously placed; the h3 point is

carelessness on the 33rd move. This reduces its aesthetic tone a lilitt ttle le,, but Black Bla ck all the the same fin finds ds a win and thereby saves the reputation of his sacrifice sacrifice..

very tweak Black threatens direct direc his and attac attack k upo upon n it by by .to .. Rh6.

3Black's  Nf6+ t imet time tr38 rouble oubKf5 le was waNxd5+ s the the reason reason

30 Ne Ne22

Only with Only wit h the knight, from g  , is it possible to defend the h3 point, therefore White's move is forced. However a combinational storm breaks out on the board. 0 ... Qxh3+!

An excellent combination, proving that the strengt of pieces is determined by their deployment and the dynamic role which they have in prospect to play in the cause of of immediate events. White's Whi te's quantitive advantage of a whole queen is more than compensated by the active position of the Black pieces. Moreover White's pieces now find themselves behind their king and and are unable, in the shortest possible time which is allowed them, to come to its help. 3 1 Kx Kxh3 h3 Rh6 Rh6 + 32 Kg Kg4 4 N+ 33 Kf5 Nd

Now mate in three moves is thre th reat aten ened ed by . . . R + , agai agains nstt which, however, White can still defend himself himself;; meanwhile meanwhile 33 . . . Ng4 would have made mate unavoidable. 34 Rg5 R+ 35 Kg4 N+ 36 Kf5 Ng8+ 3 Kg4

Thee combinat Th com bination ion has been com-

•••

for this unnecessary move. 39 Kg4 Nf6+ 40 Kf5 Ng8+ 41 Kg4 N + 4 2 K Kff5 Ng8 Ng8+ + 43 4 3 Kg4 Bxg5 44 Kxg5 R

Again, mate is threatened after . . . Rg7 + 45 Bh4 Rg6+ 46 KhS R 4 Bg5 Rxg5 + 48 Kh4 Nf6 . . . R5 R5gg6  also winning. 49 N g3 Rxg3 Rxg3 50 Qxd6 R3g6 5 1 Qb8+ Rg8 and Whi White te resigned resigned..

Out of two possible ways of realising the queen sacrifice, Black chose the worse. worse. This did not alter the result, but the artistic side of the combination faded. Thus technical infallibility is also an important element element of aesthetics aesthet ics.. If we are looking looki ng for an analogy, then a technical mistake in the process of a combination can be compared, perhaps, to a stroke of the brush in thee ppainting th ainting of a whole picture. In a picture, however, however, such suc h a strok strokee of the brush brus h can ca n be corre corrected, cted, washed washed o and restored in such a way as to achieve a production of full, high artistic value. In chess this is not possible. A mistake made in the process of carrying out a plan accompanies duction duction, , until unti lthe the given end end of ofchess tim time, e, proas a witness to its artistic imperfection.

We return again to a few inter

plicated due to Black s technical 26  

Chess Mleg Mlegame ame Combina Combinations  tions 

esting illustrations. As is well known, combinatinal romanticism found a good refuge in the thoughts of many chess players of the 9th century and ealier. uch very important representatives of Western romanticism as Anderssen, Zukertort, Mackenzie, Blackburne, Bird and others were proud champions of sacriicial tactics. Much material was sacrificed by them, even the queen. First of all we give some examples from their practice.

The diagram position is from the game MackenzieMason Mason (Paris 878) There folowed 17 Qh6+! Black was just about to steal away with his king to f8. His last movee was mov was 16 . . . Rag8. Rag8. With W ith the the queen sacrifice, White forces the enemy king to journey forth into the enemy camp, where of course, it will wi ll be shown no mercy. Later we we wi be convinced that such a forcible away the king intoas-a zone luring occupied by ofenemy forces sumes amost a typical character.

is one f the first with this idea. 17 Kxh6 Kxh 6 1 8 Nhf hfSS + Bx BxfS fS 19 NxfS+ KhS 20 g4+ 000

This sacrifice f a pawn is n obligatry. Mate in 23 mves wa als achieved 20 ... Rh3+ 2 Nh6 mate,after r 20 Nh4g4 2 Rxh4+ g6 22 Rh6 mate. 20 Kxg xg4 4 2 1 Rg3 + KhS 22 Be2 mate 000

Thus the theme f the cmbinatin is mate. uch a mate, frm nw n, we will wi ll call thematic themati c . The cmbinatin cntained three thematic mates: the bishp n e2, th knight n h6 and the rk n h6. In the game, Kosch Kosch  yd yd,, after the 25th mve was created, it would seem, a perfectly quiet position. Hwever, White strived for precisely this positin,  he was inspired by a pwrul cmbinational mtive, in view of his very actively placed bishop. The a2g8 diagonal, on which the bishop is deployed, points directly to a combinatin.

The famous problemist Loyd,

However the present combination

ooking placidy at the board was 27

 

Ches Ch esss M le lega game meCom Comb bat atns  ns 

probaby shaken to the bottom of his heart when there foowed 2 6 Qxg6!! and Back coud resign in view of 26 . . . hxg6 hxg6 27 R. The six six moves which Back made (26 ... Qd7 2307 QxfS R R Rad8 RaRf8 d8 28 29 e6 Qc7 31 Rh3 QeS h6 QxeS 32 fxeS ) were essentia essentiay y an a n unneces unnecesssary "production cost. We now present a queen sacrific icee , made by the eader of of German romanticism, Adof Anderssen. (Berin Andesen h Andesen haUop aUopp p 1 864) This game, toge together ther with wi th the combination combin ationa a finae, asted asted j ust 1 4 moves.  e4 e5 2 f4 d5 3 NfJ dxe4 4 Nxe5 Bd6 5 B4 Bxe5 6 e5 Qd4 7 Qe2 Qxe5 8 d4! Qxd4 9 Nc3 N 1 0 B Bee3 Qd8 1 1 0 0 h6

On 1 1 . . . 00 Whit Whitee wo woud rep repyy 1 2 Rad 1 Nbd7 1 3 BgS obtainin obtainingg an irresistibe attack. 12 B5

Now 13 Rad Bd7 or Nbd7 14 Qxe4! is threatened. Back does not see thiscannot queen sacrifice, but he generay defend himsef against White's combinationa attack. 12

•• •

Nbd7

(ee next diaam

13 Qxe4+!

An obvious sacrifice sacrifice,, hich consideraby reduces its aesthetic vaue; nevertheess the queen is given up for insignificant materia. Contemporaries of thisas as-y sessed sess ed this thi s combination as atime "highy "high instructive ending. The concud-

... Nxe4 14 Bxf7 mate.

We do not have to discuss the motive of this combination. The course of the game, from the very opening, has a competey combinationa motive, over which "oomed the significance of accepting the weakness of the f7 point. Attack on this point aso made up the idea of the combination, into which entered the distraction of the Back knight from the f6 square. The thematic mate presents itsef as a pure mate, with two bishops, to ainBack haf ocked by itsking ownwhich pieces.is chaopp payed the game weaky and Anderssen probaby did not have to work very hard to demonstrate the aesthetic briiance of his pan. RiemannAndesen

(Bresau 1876)  e4 e5 2 f4 exf4 3 B4 Qh4+ 4 Kf d5 5 Bxd5 Nf6 Nf6 6 Nc3 B 7 e5 exf6 1 0 Bxc3 Qe2 Qe2 +8 K d8 Bx  Q94 NO Re Re8 QhS

A transparent combinational

"trap which one does not have to

ingg ma in mate te is origina and and "pur "pure, e , 1 3 28  

Chesss Mdl Ches Mdlegam egamee Com Comba batn tns  s 

be particuary perspicacious to notice, but most frequenty it is precise pr eciseyy a queen sacriice which is overooked. 12 Bx?

does the concept does concept of o f combinationa combinationa vision enter into chess terminoogy. Combinationa vision arises anywhere in the inmost recesses of our thoughts and, heping in the

tion! Asothe exampe iustrates ustr ates th the e by present no means rare case of this sort. Very often a combination remains unnoticed, not ony by the payer over whom hangs the threat. ometimes even an "obvious combination sips out of eyeshot, as we have aready seen above and wi come across time and again in i n the future. future. What does does this impy? This impies that com-

work imagination, aows usouto find of interesting, beautifu, twardy weveied combinations. It is we known that there are chesspayers who possess or who have poss ssed very good, sharp combinationa vision. Amongst these, in the first instance, we can pick, out of contemporary UR chesspayers, Ta, passky, Korchnoy. no y. In the the past past  the giants giants of combination were Anderssen, Zukertort, Pisbury, Lasker, Chigorinn and, gori and, o f cour course, se, Aekhine. Aekhine. At the same time, there exist strong chesspayers who possess average combinationa vision. It is precisey these chesspayers, for the most part, who overook overook combinations. This is why it is not possibe to equate the overooking of combinations with a simpe "bunder of pieces, pawns or mate. I t i s true that under some combinationa schemes, which are discussed beow, we do succeed in pacing a theoretica base, but for the present such schemes are sti comparativey few in number. A vai va iing ing ourseves of a convenient opportuni opportu nity ty for a itte itt e digres-

binations are an eement the chess strugge, most yiedingof with diicuty to theoretica generaisa-

sion, by no ofmeans to eave we the theme queenintend sacrifice. Extensive materia sti ies ahead

White ought ought to to payof1 2this d3 wiheth isa good game. Instead mated in 5 moves.

12 Qxf3+! 13 gxf3 Bh3+ 14 2  14 Kg Re + 15 K Bh4 •••

mate

14 ... ... B Bh4+ h4+ 1 5 Kg Kg  Re  + 1 6 Qf Rxf mate

White "fe for the combina-

of us in this area, which we con

tion and anaysis. Not for nothing 29  

Chess Mdleg Mdlegame ame C Comba ombaons  ons 

sider absoutey absoute y essentia to bring to the notice of our readers. A few more od iustrations. Vienna Game

White: Back: PC.Hamppe .Meitner (Vienna 1873) 1 e 4 e 5 2 Nc3 Bc5 3 Na Na4 4 Bxf2+

White wants to refute Back's 2 nd move, and Back  White's 3 rd move. harp pay ensues, in which White tries t ries to hod on to the extra piece. 4 Kxf2 Qh4+ 5 Ke3

The right continuation was 5 g3 Qxe4 6 N Qxa4 7 Bh3 foowed by 8 Re Re . 5 ... Q4+ 6 Kd3 d5 7 Kc3 Qxe4 8 Kb3 Na6 9 a3

safe refuge for his wandering "monarch by paying 12 a4. 12 Kxc5 Ne7

Now Back threatens mate in t w o mov es  . . . b6+ b 6+ an a nd . . . Bd Bd77 + . 1 3 Bb5 Bb5 + Kd8 1 4 Bc6! Bc6!

The ony move to save himsef from mate mate.. After After 14 . . . bxc6 bxc6 1 5 N  White Wh ite breaks out of the mat mating ing net,, into which his king has net has faen, ae n, and then the materia advantage tes. 14 ... . .. b b6 6 + 15 Kb5 Nxc Nxc6 6 16 Kxc Kxc6 6 B b 7 + ! 1 7 Kb K b5

Accepting this sacrifice sacrifice is strictly stric tly prohibit pr ohibiteed  1 7 Kx Kxb7 b7 Kd7 18 Qg Qg4 + Kd6, and White is mated. 1 7 ... Ba6+ 1 8 Kc6! Kc6!

White is accurate. He coud sti get mated after 18 Ka4 Bc4! 1 8 ... .. . Bb Bb77 + Draw Draw by perpetua check. Thus Back's queen sacrifice ed to a draw. After After the quee qu eenn sacrif sacr ifice ice Back payed in the best way, consequenty ony one question re-

A surprising combination! By sacricing the queen, Back competey isoates the White king from its army and surrounds it with his

mainsdiagram to be dec decided ided  whether, in the position, Back had avaiabe a continuation better thann . . . Qxa4, tha Qxa4, in other other word words,s, was it worth sacrificing the queen for the sake of a draw? draw ? White Whi te threatens th reatens to pay Nc3 and then Ka2, after which the extra piece, which he has,s, can ha can "caim "c aim its right. right . Ony Ony two retorts are possibe against this: 9 . . . Be6 an and 9 d4. The attep atteptt 9 . . .

ow own oraces. 10 nKx Kfxorces. 4 Nc5 Nc5 + 1 1 Kb4 a5 + Back aso has to give up the

Be6insis to refook refuted uted at 1 0continua d4. There The re nre-9 ma mains aby t the conti nuatio tion . . . d4, but then 1 0 K Kaa2 Be6 Be6 + 1 1 b3

9

•••

Qxa4+!

knight. Otherwise White finds a

is possibe. Thus, f , .1 Back's 30

 

Chess Mlega Mlegame me Co Combna mbnations  tions 

point of view, the queen sacrifice was the right decision. Not to mention the fact that White might make a mistake in the diicut defence and ose, Back with this

tal t alia ian n Game

sacrifice insures himsef against oss. BackbueMackenzie (London 1882). The position after White's 29th mo move ( 29 Qg2 ? )

c3 Nf6 5  Bb6 Bh6 b6 69 Qb3 d6 8 Bg5 Bh40 0g57 d3 10 Bg3

White: H.Bird Back: A.Bu (London 1886) 1 e4 e5 2 NfJ Nc6 3 Bc4 Bc5 4

At first sight it seems that, by sacrificing a piece, 10 NxgS, White obtains chances of a win. Howe Ho weve ver,r, Back would repy 10 . . . Nxe4 with an interesting counterattack att ack.. Moreove Moreover,r, also also afte afterr 1 0 . . . hxgS 11 BxgS Bx +  Back has promising defensive resources. 10 Ne7 1 1 Nbd Nbd c6 c6 12 d4 exd4 13 Nxd4 Nxe4? 14 Nxe4 d5 15 N+ Kg7 16 Nh5+ Kg6 17 Bd3+ • ••

There foows a combination with wi th a queen sacrifice sacrifice and a beautibeaut ifu thematic mate to concude. 29

•••

Qxd5!

im py 1 7 Be2 impy Be2 was was aso possi possibe, be, but White Whi te has pa p ann nned ed a combination with a queen sacriice. 17

•••

Kxh xh55 18 Q Q  + Bg4 Bg4

In the the even eventt of 1 8 . . . g4, White quicky decides the game after 19

Backbue at this time aready one was f the strongest chesspayers in the word. In the 2nd congress congress of the Ge Gerrman Chess Federation in 1881, which was held in Berin, he took 1st prize, outstripping Zukertort, Winawer, Chigorin, L. Pausen and many other masters of that time. And none the ess he did not notice the threatened queen sacrifice!

h3.

30 eex xd5Bxc2 Bf Bf5 + 3 1 Qc Qc22 R Raa  + ! 32 Kxa

19 Qxg4+

and White was mated on the next

A quite simpe combination

move.

with a queen sacrifice, but the 31

 

Chess Mlega Mlegame me C Combiat ombiations  ions 

Engish champion did not see it, otherwise he woud, of course, have resigned. 19

•••

Kxg4 20 Be2 mate

Internationa touament practice knows quite a few cases ofwith the overooking of combinations a queen sacrifice, even in cassics of chess art. Here is one exampe. In the game anowski anowski chechter, payed in the great inteationa touament at London 1889, after White's 33rd move the foowing position was reached.

Whi te's pieces have headed harWhite's moniousy towards the king's ank, and the position of the Back king is far from safe. For exampe, exam pe, 34 e5 dxe5 35 Qh6 e4 36 R5 is threatened, and Back is defenceess. There foowed: 33

•

mediate 34 Nf5 Bxf5 35 Rxf5 Qc3 36 Rxf8+ Kxf8 woud give White nothing,, since nothing si nce on 3 7 Qxh Qxh 7 ffo oows ows 37 ... Qx3+. However, after 34 Kh2, this variation is threatened, and some other attacks.equay A this,aso apparenty, worried chechter so much that he ost s ight of such an unusua method as the sacrifice of a whoe queen. 34 Qxh7+!! Kxh7 35 Rh5+ Kg8 36 Ng6 and Back rsined

in view of the inevitabe mate. Let us now take  ook at the queen sacrifice in the pay of Aekhine. This outstanding Russian chesspayer vaued highy the aesthetic eement in ches, the basic refection of which he considered to be the sacrifice. The number of pieces sacrificed by Aekhine in the course of his creative work was enormous. It goes without saying that amongst the pieces sacrificed was aso the queen. AekhineCoUe (Paris 1925)

R8?

o as to meet 34 e5 with Rxe5. However this move misses a beautifu beautif uT, hdeci de f.o. r. White. e cisive best besive st defe decombination fenc ncee wa was 33 fo 6, but aso in this case Back's

The position ooks cear and an evauation of it shoud present no

6, but a so th s case B ack s position remains diicut. An im

compications. Materia is eve 32

 

Chesss Md Ches Mdleg legame ame Com Comba batio tions  ns 

but White has a strong passed pawn, he contros the open ines, hiss king hi ki ng fees fees freer freer and moreover it it is his turn to move. Undoubtedy, White has a positiona advantage but to see combinathat the boardit isis not fu easy of hidden tiona motives and that one of them, and and besides the most important is the unfortunate (it tus out!) position of the Back queen. 29 Bxg6! hxg6

From the positiona point of view the most accurate repy. On 29 . . . Qxg6 Qxg6 fo foow owss the combin combinaation 30 Qxd7. Finay, 29 ... fxg6 makes White's passed pawn a rea dang da nger. er. For For exampe: exampe: 29 . . . fxg fxg6 30 Qe66 + Rf7 3 1 Rc Rxc 32 Qxc+ Qe Rf 33 Re! Qf5 34 Rxf+ Qx 35 Qc6, and, in order to repuse the threat d6, Black must give up a pawn by by continuing continuing 3 5 . . . Qf3 36 Qa+ Qf 37 Qxa7 Qd6. However, in this endgame, endgame, the struggle struggle mightofsti haveCoe been would protracted and, course, have gone into it if he had foreseen the combinatina consequences of his "obvious move. However, east of a, did he think about the possibiity, from the opponent's side, of a queen sacrifice. 30 Qxd7! Rxd7 31 Re8+ Kh7 32 Rc8 Rd8 33 Rexd8 and Back resined.

Back has just taken the pawn, 24 . . . N xb2 , assumin assumingg he had had deceived his oppone opponent nt,, since s ince on 25 Rxd7 folow olowss 25 . . . Rxd 7! 26 Rxd7 Rxd7 Nxa4 with an obvious advantage to Back. However there folowed: 25 Qxa7! Rxa7

Back goes into the combination and accepts the queen sacrifice, afte af terr which whi ch he oses ose s by by force orce.. Upon thee oth th other er cont contin inua uati tion onss  . . . Rx Rxd2 d2 or . . . Nxd  t he resut sut w o u d be the same, but not so forcing. 26 Rxd8+ B 27 Bxc5 h6 28 Rx+ Kh7 29 Rdd8 Q + 3 0 Kh2 Nh4! On R7 this 31 ina move is based White's combination. Back res igned in view of the quick mate

after 31 ... g5 32 Rh+ Kg7 33 Rdg+ or 31 ... g6 32 Bd4. In conclusion we present two combinations, simiar in idea, motive and theme, where the queen was oered for sacrifice aready on the th e first first move. B y means means

of the sacrifice sacfrom rifice behind the opponent's king k ing is driven the chain of

its defending pawns and, under the coordinated coordina ted bows b ows of the two rooks

AekhineMoina

(Buenos Aires 1926) 33  

Chess Mle Mlegame game Co Combinio mbinions  ns 

and knight, makes a journey into the enemy camp, surrounded by hostile pieces and pawns, and is naturaly nished o.

There fll fllwed: wed: 28 Qx Q x + !

In this thi s way way White Wh ite deprives depri ves the   pawn of defe defenc ncee and introduc intr oduces es the th e possibilility possib ity of his wn harmoniously harmoniousl y operating roks launching a very strong attac on the enemy king. 28 Kx 29 Rx+ Kg8 30 Ne7+ Kh8 31 R+ Kg7 32 R+ Kh6 33 Ng8+ Kg5 ••

has a weakened queen's flank and his knight is precariously precariously placed p laced n n c6, being under threat by the queen. In shrt, the first impression is that White has the initiative, but it is Black's move. There follwed: 30

•

Re+

At first sight this check merits censure, since it deprives the knight knig ht on c6 f defence. defence. N evertheever theless, as will be seen later, it is correct. 31 Kg2 Qxf2+!

On 33 . . . Kh5 foll follw ws mate in

A queen sacrifice, which forces

two moves.Qxe2 35 h4+ Kg4 36 34 Kh2!

mateKxf few moves. 32 Kxinf2a R8e2 + 33 3 3 KO KO Ne5 Ne5 + 34 f4 f4 Rfl + 35 Kg5 h6 + 3 6 Kxh6 Rxh2+ 37 Kg5 Rh5 mate

Rf4+ Kh5 37 Kh3 g5 38 g4+ Back resigned.

This idea of enticing the opponent's king, by a queen sacrifice sacrifice,, to "visit him, has already already come quite qu ite a long way. Here is a combination, similar in motive, idea and theme. Kugenek  Romanovsky

The last last tw tw combnations combnations  and and we could, if we wanted, add som more examples with analogous ideas of pursuing a king which has beenn lured bee lured into into open open sspa pace ce  ununquestionably point to the possibil-

(Petersburg 1912) is te excange Though Back

ity sions o f some of theoretic theoretica general con-clu clusions even in the aarea of combicombi

national creativity. national creativity. We wil wi l devote devote the next chapter to to this question. qu estion.

ahead, White has managed to provoke some compications, Back 34  

Chapt Cha pter er S Abou Ab outt th the e Th Theo Typic Ty eo pical al of Id Ideas eas Com Combi bina nao ons ns. .  At the the basis ba sis of a combination combin ation ies ie s a creative idea. The birth of an idea  t h i s isis te fruit of the mind and imagination of man. Creative thought is impoverished without inventive fire and and a broad outook, when it is usuay unabe to create deep, origina ideas, beautifu

finay, to a certain extent, the methods of combinationa thinking at the chessboard. Concerning the genera theory, it is necessary to incude aso the tactics of combinations, ie. the numerous technica methods methods which aow the ffu u carrying out of combinationa

creative The forms. question arises as to whether there exists in the purey creative roe of chess art, in its combinationa area, a theory simiar to, et us say, the virtuay immutabe theory of the endgame (rue of the square, opposition, et etc. c. ) or o r the the theory of the the ope opening ning where there is absouey no need to provide proof proof of the useessnes use essnesss ( a t east! ea st! ) of such openin opening moves as 1 g4, 1 h4, 1 . . . h5, 1 . . . g5 g5 and possiby some others as we? Of course it exists. There is a genera theoryy of combination theor combin ations,s, there exist exis t aso successfu genera concusions of combinationa practice, a famiiarity with which aows every chesspayer to find a correct combinationa binati ona reference reference point in many

pans. There exist rather a ot of particuar positions, especiay those where both motives and themes are of the same tye. In such positions aso combinationa ideas come to be of the same type (usuay). This oers a possibiity of constructing a method of generaising the theory of a number of combinations, which can be body caed typica combinations. Let us ook at one of these these typica combico mbinations in detai. Theo Th eoreticay reticay th thee scheme scheme of it is ike this:

positions. Concerning the genera theory of combinations, above a, is its

definition, an anaysis of the eements of which it is made up, and 35  

Chess Ch ess M le lega game me Comb Comb ti tion ons  s 

The prerequisite for the combination ( its motive) is the weak weaknes nesss of the h 7 point poi nt,, defe defend nded ed ony on y by the king, and the ready for attack ( i  e . succe success ssfu fu depoy depoyment) ment) White W hite knight, queen and bishop. The techniquee of the techniqu the combina co mbination tion does not ook compicated. By means of a bishop bi shop sacrifice on h 7 , Wh White ite exposes the position of the king, chaenges it on h7 by a knight check, and sets Back an unpeasant choice, whether to advance the king towards towards open space, space, or to go bac backk  where where it wi  prov provee diidiicut, and often an impossibe task to repuse the threats of mate. The soution to the scheme is thus: 1 Bxh7+ Kxh7

Though the retreat Though retreat of the king k ing to h8 aows White to maintain both his attack and and the materia mater ia advantadvantage he has gained, this woud have been comparativey best. 2 NgS+ Kg8

In cacuating the in combination White must examine detai the possibiity of the advance of the king to h6 or g6. The usua continuation of the attack in these the se cases cases is 3 Qg4.

how this wel known combinationa scheme, which first saw the ight of day about 300 years ago, nevertheess finds itsef being carried out aso in crucia games in inteationa touaments of the 20th century. ueen's Gambit

White: K.chechter Back: H.o Internationa Tournament (Ostende 905) 1 d4 dS 2 N Nf6 Nf6 3 e3 cS 4 c4 e6 S Bd3 Nc6 6 0  0 a6 7 Nc3 dxc4 8 Bxc4 bS 9 Bd3 Bb7

Apparent Appare ntyy are aready ady this this  an automatic foow up to his 8th move  is an inaccurate inaccurate continuation continuation and eads to eary diicuties. On the other hand, after 9 ................... cxd4 10 exd4 Nb4 and then Bb 7, Back obtains a good game and thereby proves that White's opening system is harmess. 10 a4! c4?

But this raising of the siege against the combinationa d4 point opensprospects, up for White rea in connection with the advance of the epawn. The esser evi woud have ha ve been been 10 ...... b4 1 1 Ne4 Ne4 cxd4 cxd4 1 2 Nxf6+ gxf6! 1 3 exd4 Rg8,

3 QhS

This aso is a typica position for examg the combinationa scheme. In order to save himsef from immediate mate, Back is forced to move his rook, but then after 4 Qxf7 White's attack as-

concentrating counterpressure on the g2 point. 1 1 axbS axbS axbS axbS 12 Rxa8 Rxa8 Bxa8 Bxa8 1 3 Bb Qb8

White's advantage consists of the fact that he outstrips Back in

sumes a decisive character. The foowing game iustates

deveopment, and that the atter, stricty speaking, aready has no 36

 

Chesss Mdl Ches Mdlegam egamee Combi Combintion ntions  s 

titime me to secure casti ca sting ng for for himsef. him sef. 14 e4!

Exacty! White intends to remove mo ve the th e Bac B ackk knight knig ht from from f6 and thereby there by deprive the h 7 point of defence. If Back castes, it woud be possibe possibe to carry out the scheme, which we have ooked at, at , by means of a bishop b ishop sacrifice sacrifice on h 7 . 14

••

Be7

Back meets the danger hafway. He shoud oud p pay 1 4 . . . Nb4, but, ceary, it is aso not easy to payy with pa wi th the th e king in i n the th e centre. centre. 1 5 Bg5 Bg5 0  0

After this everything goes "swimmingy. It is hard to beieve that Wof forgot about the bishop sacrific sacri ficee on h 7. Perhaps, i t seemed to him that, that , in the present concrete conditions, a defence woud tu up for Back. If this is so then he fe fe victim to unjustif unjusti fied optim optimism. ism. 16 e5 Nd5 17 Nxd5 exd5 18 Bxe7 Nxe7

( eary eary 1 7th cent centur ury) y) . 19 Bxh7 Kxh7

He canot refuse the "Greek gift. An even quicker catastrophe ensues ens ues afte afterr 19 . . . Kh Kh88 20 Ng5 Ng5 g6 2 1 Q Nf5 Nf5 22 Bxg6. Bxg6. 20 Ng5 + Kg6

The best, but insuicient, defensiv def ensivee resource resource.. On 2200 . . Kg8 Kg8 foows, according to the scheme, 2 1 Qh5 Re8 22 Qxf7+ Qxf7+ Kh8 2 3 f4, f4, with the irresistibe threat of R. If, If, ho howeve wever,r, 22 . . . Kh6, Kh6, then 23 Qg44 Qc8 24 Qg 2 4 Qh4 Qh4 + Kg6 2 5 Qh7 + Kxg5 26 f4+ Kg4 27 Qh3 mate. 2 1 Qg4 Qg4 £5 £5

No hep either is 21 ... f6, on which, as aso in the game, woud have foowed 22 exf6. However the threat of Ne6+ cannot be repused in any other way. 22 ex gx

Or 22 22 . . . Rxf6 Rxf6 23 23 Ne6 Ne6+ + Kf7 Kf7 24 Qxg7+ Kxe6 25 Re+. 2 3 Ne6+ Ne6+ K 24 Q Qg7 g7 + Kx Kxe6 e6 2 5 Re + Kf Kf5 26 Qh7 Qh7 + Kg5 Kg5 2 7 Rxe7 Mate is forced by means of 27

h4+ Kg4 Kg4 ( 2 7 . .  K K 28 Qh6 Qh6 + ) 28  + Kg3 29 Qg7+ and Qg4 mate. mate. 27 Rg 8 28 Re Rg8 Re33  29 Rg3 + Qxg3 30 Qxg8+ Back esigned •••

Let us examine Let exami ne one more more coourfu, game on the same theme. ueen's Gambit Gambit

It cannot be doubted that chechter envisaged this position in making his 14th move. There fo-

White: G.ave Back: M . Vidmar Inteationa Tournament

ows a typica combination, weknown from the time of Grec

(Petersburg 1909) 1 d4 d5 2 c4 e6 3 Nc3 c5 4 e3 37

 

Chess Che ss  leg legame ame Com Combina bination tions  s 

Nf6 5 NO N6 6 a3 Bd6 7 dxS BxS 8  Bd6 9 B Bb2 b2 0  0 10 Bd3 a ! 1 1 bS N eS

Back's combinationa pan becomes cear. He wi exchange White's knight, which prevents the reaisation of the idea of the bishop sacrifice on h2. 12 NxeS BxeS 13 Qe2 Qe7 14 0  0 b 6 1 5 Na4 B7 1 6 Rac Rac 1

White does not stand bady and has chances to seize the initiative after carrying out the break c5. However, he shoud keep under observation the situation on the king's ank, where in i n the weaknes weaknesss of the h2 point is contained a typica ty pica combinatio combinationa na motive with wit h the bishop sacriice on h2. 1 6 .. . Rd8

pay either 7 cxd5 or at first 17 Bxff6 Qx Bx Qxf6 and then  8 cxd5 . The compications deveop in White's favour thanks to the precarious position of the Back bishop on c7 , for exampe, 17 cxd5 Nxd5 (if 17 . . . exd5, exd5, then then 1 8 Bx Bxf6)  8 Qc Qc22 g6 g6 (or 1 8 . . . h6)  9 e4 Nf4 20 Qxc7 Qxc7 Qxc7 2 Rxc7 Nxd3 22 Nxb6 Rb8 23 Bf6 (or Nxc8 etc). 1 7 . .. bxS bxS 1 8 Nx NxSS Bd6 Bd6 1 9 Q2 Q2 eS 20 a4

On 20 h3 h3 coud coud foow 20 20    Bxh3 21 gxh3 Rac8 20 ... Bg4!

Backk thre Bac threat aten enss 2 1 . . . Rac8 22 Ba3 Nd7.

21 Nb3 Ra8 22 Qbl e4 23 B2

It was possibe to pay 23 Bxf6, bu t after 23 . . . Qxf6 Qxf6 2 4 Rx Rxc8 c8 Rxc8 Rxc8 25 Bc2 Qh6 26 h3 Bxh3 on 26 g3 Qh3 White's time woud aso be up. 23 ... Be2 24 fel

Aso now, if 24 Bxf Bxf6 , then then 24 24 . . . Qxf Qxf6 2 5 Rf Rfee 1 B ! Whi White te cannot save6himsef.

1 7 cS

Routiney and nonconcretey payed. Firsty White achieves nothing from this break and, at the same time ti me,, opens o pens a way for Back to attack the king's fank in connection with the advance of the epawn.

At ast a a the prerequisi prerequi sites tes have have been created for a combination

Instead of his ast, rather hasty "attacking move, White shoud 38  

Chess Ch ess M le lega game me Combi Combia ati tions  ons 

with the the sacrif sacr ifice ice of a bishop b ishop on h2 h2 and subsequent attack with the queen and knight on the White king, heped out of the "fortress.

encountered earier. Here is an exampe from the practice of that great chespayer.

24 ... ... Bxh2 + ! 25 Kxh2 Ng4+ 26 Kh3 Rd6

The rook is aso incuded in the attack.

27 Bxe4 Rh6+ 28 Kg3 Qh4+ Qh4+ 29 4 Q h 2 + and mates in 4 moves. White resigned.

A typica cmbinationa idea can be considere consideredd the expoitat exp oitation ion of a king ocked in by its own pawns (motive) to achieve a decisive materia or positiona advantage, whie at other times even a forced mate. The main idea in such combinations is to strive to divert , from the defenc defencee of the first or ast rank (depending ( depending on whether wheth er the initiator is White or Back), the enemy pieces covering it. The themes of such combinations can be various, but more often than any other is met the theme of doube attack, as, for exampe, in the game, BernsteinCapabanca, with which whi ch the t he reader reader has aread areadyy become . acquainted in Chapter 4. Both by this game and by those given beow one can aso be convinced how great an eement of aesthetics is contained in combinions of this type, despite the fact that to a considerabe extent they have now aready become the property of of theory. The history hi story of this combination takes us back at east

The diagram features the position after the 18th move in the Morphy Mongrdien Morphy game (Match, Paris 1859). The sharp combinationa sight of Morphy perceived here a beautifu combination on the theme f doube attack, as a motive for which serves the ockedin position of the Back king and the undefended state of his his bishop on b 7 . Th Ther eree foowed: 19 Nxf6 xf6 20 Rhf Qd8 Qd 2 1doube Rx Rx +attack Qx 2222 Q and8the decided the

strugge. Interesting rther is this combination combi nationa a variat variation ion:: 22 . . . Nd7 23 Qxb7 Rb8 24 Qxc7 Qb4 25 Bb5 axb5 26 Qxb8+ Nxb8 27 Re8+. I n the 10th game of the match, Taasch Lasker (Munich 1908), White cevery expoited the oc in position of Lasker's king and won a pawn in a situation which was very favourabe for him. After

to the time of Morphy, but it is highy probabe that it was aso

Back's 24th move, the game reached the foowing positon. 39

 

Ches Ch esss M leg legme meCo Comb mba ati tions  ons 

There is ony one repy for Back. 25 ... Qg6 26 Bf4 Re6 27 Bxd6 Qh5

A combinationa "trap. On 28 Be5 ? Back wins wi ns th e game game afte afterr 28 . . . Q x d  + 29 Rxd Rxd  Rxd Rxd  + 30 Kh2 Rg6. Undou Undoubt bted edy y better better was 2 7 . . . h5 , a move pointed out by Lasker, Lasker, but this coud ony proong resistance. Back has has a rea position positi on weakness ne ss  the d6 pawn. pawn. White coud coud win it at once, by continuing 25 Bf4 Re + 26 Rxe Rxe  Qxe  + 27 Kh2, Kh2,

28 Qg4 Qxg4 29 hxg4 Re4 30 Bxc55 Rx Bxc Rxd2 d2 3 1 Rxd2 Rxd2 h5 3322 Rd6 Back resned.

and the th d6 d6 pa paof wn28i s os Be5 ost.t. g6 2 7 29 .  . dQg5 5 is bad ineview Re8 30 Bf6 with w ith the th e threats of Qh6 and cxd5. However, Lasker probaby reckoned in this variation, instead of 27 ... d5, on paying simpy 2 7 . . . Qe6 28 Bxd6 Qg6, Qg6, and Back, thanks to the oppositecooured bishops, obtains chances of a draw. This, however, was obviousy

cassic exampe ofposition the expoitation of the ockedin of a king as a leit-mot of a combination.

fsteered oreseencear asoof by arrasch. arrasch . reef He the T "drawing and, expoiting the ockedin position of the Back king, found a combinationa decision, eading quicky to victory. There foowed: 25 Bh6!

Threatening no more, no ess than mate, and preparing, in the eventt of 25 . . . Qxh6 , the decisi even decisive ve combinationa bow 26 Qxe5.

The foowing game represents a

Philidor Defence

White: Z.Adams Back: C.To (New Orleans 1920)

1 e4 e5 2 N d6 3 d4 exd4

If we set the opening task of the strugge to be infuence in the centre, appropriate and it is weknown wekno wn that thisheis an question, then shoud shou d of course ppre refe ferr 3 . . . Nf6 Nf6 here. Though the exchange made by Back does not ead to ceary bad conseq consequen uences, ces, it simpy si mpy makes makes it easier for White Whi te to draw up a pan of pay. 4 Qxd4 Nc6

o me payers ome p ayers woud wo ud now prefer prefer 4 . . . Bd7 , so as as ttoo th then pay pay . . . Nc6 wi th tempo, tempo, but this particuar and and

Back aso cannot pay now 25 ... Re + 26 Rxe Qxe + 2 7 Kh2 Kh 2 g6 28 Qc3, and mate is inevitabe.

rather intangibe consideration cannot serve here as a basis for criticism of the continuation cho 40

 

Chess Mdlegame Combnation Combnations  s 

sen by Back. On 4 . . . Bd7 White woud have repied 5 B5 Nc6 6 Qd, and the possession of a base on d5 means he sti retains the better bet ter position. position. 4 . . . Qf6 is worth worth considering. 5 Bb5 Bd7 6 Bx6 Bx6 7 N3 N 8 0-0 Be7 9 Nd5

The position after the 8th move had aready been met in tournament practice practi ce.. Thus, Thus , Pis Pi s bury , against Backburne in the London inteationa touament 1899, now payed 9 b3, which probaby gives White W hite more chance of attack.

possession of the initiative. 16 Rae Qd7 17 Bxf6

From a narrow ositiona point of view, this does not ook ike a particuary successfu operation, but . . . this is the be beginnin ginningg of of a prerequisite for the combination. 17

000

Bxf6

Back coud sti st i have rid rid himself hi mself of the terribe combinational "sco "scourg urge, e, by paying paying 16 . . . gxf6 gxf6 , after which the combination 17 Rxee 7 is not Rx not possib ssibe, e, ie. 1 7 . . . Qxe7 Qx e7 (but (bu t no not 1 7 . . . Rx Rxe7 e7 1 8 Rx Rx e7 Qxe 7 1 9 Qg Qg4  1 8 Rxe Rxe 7 ? R  

00 0

9 OnBxd Bxd5 10 ex exd5 d5 his 00-0 0 initiative, 1 1 Bg Bg55 the5 basis of

White strives to exert pressure on the ony open eie, in order to expoit his his better deveopment deveopment and territoria advantage in the centre. There is aso nothing ese for White. This pan arises from the spirit of the position.

and Back Bashould ckuld mates. O7nh3,1 6threat . . eaten. gx gxf f6 White sho pay 1On thr ening the indicated combination. If then 1 7 . . . Rc7, there there foow oowss 18 g4 g4 and, after the manoeuvre Nh4f5, Back finds himself in a hopeless situation.

1 1 6 12 4 xd5 13 xd5 R Re8 e8 14 fe a 15 Re2 R8 000

aowing combiWhite to A carfata carry ry outmistake, a very v ery beautifu nation which goes into chess history a a briiant exampe of the expoit exp oitati ation on of the motive mo tive of a king ki ng bocked in by its own pawns. Back ought oug ht to "open "open a vent, vent, i . e . pay 1 5 . . . h6 an thereb therebyy ei e iminate minate the motive and as a consequence the theme the me of of doube doube attack attack  the two two main eements e ements of the combination combinati on,, which create the combinationa

1 8 4!

White's doube attack on the rook on e8 wi force Back to keep his rook on c8 aso under the defe de fenc ncee of tw twoo pieces  queen queen and

rook. It is enough for White to deect the queen from the a4e8 diagona or the rook from the ast

idea. It shoud, however, be noted thatt aso tha aso afte afterr 1 5 . . . h6 16 Bd Bd and and thenn 1 7 Bc3, the Bc3 , White has has firm firm 41  

Chess Mdleg Mdlegame ame C Combatio ombations  ns 

rank, and mate by Rxe8, to demonstrate distincty the theme of the combination. Repeated appications of the technica method of diversion of the opponent's queen from the e8 point in the end achieves the objective. Back finds himsef faced with a depressing ateative, whether to ose the queen or be mated. The extea idea of removing the queen from the a4e8 diagona is very nerveracking. White's queen itsef is eft undefended and

Back resned.

Combinations , motivated by the Combinations ockedin position of the enemy king are frquenty met in the creative creati ve work of of chesspayers chesspayers . Here are some exampes. The diagram poston is from the game N .Pavov  Romanovsky Romanovsky,, after White's 20th move.

en pse invunerabe, to both Back's twice heavy is paced piec p ieces. es.

This combination goes into the historyy of chess stor chess art a rt as producing producing one of the most aesthetic impressions. 1 8 ... Qb5

Now Back even threatens the winnin winn ingg m mov ovee . . . Qxe2 Qxe2 , but ther theree foows ... 1 9 Qc 4!

Briian Bri iant,t, but the foowing move of the striking. combination is perhaps even more 19 ... Qd7

Obviousy the ony move. 20 Qc7! Qb5 2 1 a4!

Not at once 2 1 Qxb 7 ? in view of of . . . Q x e 2. 2. 21 ... Qxa4 22 Re4 Qb5 23 Qxb7

A four fourth th "sacrifice "sa crifice of the queen q ueen to concude the combination. Back's queen cannot stay on the

Back has a sma advantage in the centre, centre, but his hi s queen' que en'ss flan flankk is weak.. It is true that White' weak Whi te'ss queen queen is in unpeasant opposition to the Back rook, but this circumstance is of itte signif significan icance ce here here . Afte Afterr . . . Re7 ... Qd7 this rea mightor possiby produce reopposition a threats, but the fact of the matter is that White coud himsef pay 21 Qa6! Back has nothing better than 21 . . . Bxg3 Bxg3 2 2 hxg hxg33 Ne5 , after which which White Whi te coud take tak e the pawn pa wn on a 7 . Back's sma initiat ini tiative ive hardy compensates pensa tes for for the th e oss he has suered. suered. However, White payed 2 1 Qd3?

motivated by the variation 21

a4e8 diagona, which is a necessary condition for continuing the strugge.

Qxd3 22 Rxd3 Bxg3 23 Rxe8 + Rxe8 Rx e8 24 hxg3 hxg3 Re 1 + 25 Kh2 Re2 26 Rd2, securing him a draw. 42

 

Chess Mlegame Mlegame Combina Combinations  tions 

Nevertheess aso in this variation he is mistaken. mistaken. Inste Instead ad of 25 . . . Re2, Back maintains the better chances chanc es in the endgame endgame afte afterr 25 . . . Ne55 ! due to the bad Ne bad positio positionn of of the White king. However, other moves are worse for White. After 21 Qd3? a combinationa possibiity arises for Back which is based on the ockedin position of the White king. A good exampe of how a not very rea motive, but nevertheess one which potntiay exists,, suddeny exists su ddeny becom becomes es a decisive factor in the strugge. There fo-

for the present not very active. This contrast between a superfici superficia a pacement of roo rooks ks and their thei r actua roe is a testimony tes timony to a deep combinationa pan. The combination unfoded ie this:

owed: 21 ... Qxd3 22 Rxd3 Bxc3! and Back has an extra pawn and a strong centra group of pawns; this advantage advant age was reaised reai sed withot wi thot dif d if-ficuty in the endgame. An eegant, deepycacuated and subte subte combina co mbination tion was carried out by Back in the game, ovotenov ovote nov  Rovner (Moscow 1946, 19 46, emiina emiina of the 1 5 th UR UR Championship). In the diagram it is Back's 24th mve. It is hard to beieve, ooking at the construction of this position that th at the the motive  ocke ockedd in position of the White White king ki ng  can aread areadyy be reaised with an exceent combination on the theme of doube attack ta ck and the idea of di diverting verting White te's's piece pi ecess fr from defen defence ce ooff the th e first rank. He shoud set o the obigatory to ry and de deci cisive sive part in the combicom bi-

24 ... Bxf5!

A sacrifice which diverts the White rook from the first rank. 25 Bxf5 x 26 Rxf5 Red8 27 Qc4 Rac8 Rac8 28 2 8 Qe2 Qe2 Rxc2 Rxc2 2 9 Qxc2 Qxc2 Qc8!

N ow th e theme of th e combinacombination is iustrate iustratedd  doube attac attackk on c2 and and f5 f5 . White ccannot annot parry this bow resned. and oses a rook. Novote nov A very briiant combinationa attack was conducted by Ta against Lehmann in the match UR v West Germany, 1960, where White's idea, which Ta payed,, is based payed based on, or rather ensues fm, the motive motive  the the oc ocke kedin din positi pos ition on of of the king. ki ng. Lehmann defended himsef quite ingeniousy, but he coud not do anything

against the subte and accurate expoitation by Ta of the abovementioned minus in the Back

nation payed by the rooks (as aso in a a such combinat combinations) ions) , the posipositition onss o f which whi ch in the th e di diag agra ram m are are 43  

Chesss Mleg Ches Mlegame ame Combans 

king's poston. After the 24th move this th is game reached the the fo foowowing position.

2 6  + Rx 27 Re6!

Back cannot defend the a6 pawn and, in addition, he must worry about repusing the threat of the invasion of of the White knight. 27 Q4 28 Rxa6 Qc + 2 9 •

Kh2 Q4+ 30 g3!

Again a itte combination on the motive of "the suocated king. 30 ... Qc4 3 1 Qd2

White's queen is under attack

White's knight is invunerabe, he has an extra extra pawn and the initatve; White's fina attack, however, deserves attention. •••

and his knight necesary cover of thetied  down point. toHowever on the board are many open ies, on which heavy pieces operate, operate, and Back has a ockedin king. This combinationa motive prompts Ta to a beautifu soution to the probem. 25 Rf4!

White now threatens a very dangerous attack after 26 Ng5. ••

2 5Beautifu, Q but insuicient to

repuse the attack. Reativey best was 25 25 . . . h6 , forcin forcingg White White into into Rx+ and opening an airway for the king. On 2 5 . . h6 woud woud have have probaby foowed 26 Rxf8+ Rxf8 2 7 Qd6 Qd6 wit w ithh attacks attacks on f8 and and aa6. 6. If 27 . . . Qf6, then 28 Re6 and White maintains the initiative. Beautifu is this this poss possibe ibe variat variation ion:: 28 . . . Qa + 29 Kh2 Qxa2 Qxa2 3 0 Rxh Rxh66 + !

31 Qf

Nb7 32 Ra7 Nc5 33 Ne5

The queen moves out of pay, which makes White's White's attack easier. Best Be st now now wa wass 33 . . . Qe6. 34 R

The other way is 34 Nf7+ Kg8 35 Nh6+ Kh8 36 Rf7 Ne6 37 Qf4 Rxf7 38 Qxf7 gxh6 39 Q6+ etc. 34 ... Ne6

On 34 ... Rc8, White wins quicky Qxc5 after and 35 R+! Qd5, with the threats 3 5  + Nx 36 Q4 Ne6 Or 3 6 .  . Ng6 3 7 Qf Qf7 3 7 Q Q h6 38 Ng6+ Ng6 + Kh7 39 Ne7 Back resned.

On 39 . . . Qxh3 Qxh3 + foows oows 40 Kg 1 h5 41 Nf5 winning the knight. The question sometimes arises why the side, fiding itsef the obj ect of a combination based on the

gxh6 3 1 Qxh6+ Kg8 3 2 Qg6 gxh6 Qg6 + Kh Kh88 33 Ng5, and there is no saving Back from mate.

motive "ockedin position of the king, in anticipation of a possibe combination, does not make, in 44

 

Chesss Mle Ches Mlegm gmee Com Combat batns  ns 

good time, one of the prophyactic move mo vess . . . g or . . . h6. h6. The The rreepy to this rather naive question coud be formuated in approximatey the foowing way: in the chess stru s trugge gge the eement of tim timee , measurabe measurabe by moves or tempi , pays a very signif sign ifi-icant roe and one shoud not no t make make moves "just to be on the safe side, moves with a motivation which "does not seem to surface. Therefore the moves .. g6 or ... h6, motivated ony by the consideration that otheise the king finds itsef ocked in by its own pawns,

manage, because of the sharp process of events, events , to find time to open an "airvnt. Frm the exampes presented it can be seen that even grandmasters become victims of the theoretica combinations which we have ooked at. Let us consider now one further theoretica continuation which periodicay finds itsef a pace in contemporary practice. The question conces the sacrifice of a knigh for two pawns in the foowing situations.

cannotabstract be regarded as expedient. uch prophyactics essentiay can be, and actuay often are, a wrongfu waste of precious time. Besides Besides tthis, his, the moves moves . . . g6 and ... h6 (g3, h3) ead to a weakening of the casted position po sition and, as we see ater, can ead to the creation of new combinationa motives. You see, the motive "ockedin "oc kedin position posi tion of the king, as in any at other motive, needs toeatbe ooked not abstracty, abs tracty, but creatcr ivey, i  e . accor according ding to to the gen gener eraaconnditions co dit ions of of the strugge. In other conditions a ockedin position of the king is a pus, since it ensures safety saf ety,, and it i t does does not serve at a as a motive for a combination by the opponent. Thus a master never makes the moves h3 or g3 just for the sake of prophyaxis, not reay existing,, threats. existing threats. At the same time ,

White continues 1 Nxg5 ( in the other oth er diagram diagram corres corresppondingy 1 . . . Ng4) and after xg5 2 Bxg5 renews ren ews the pin of the knight knig ht f6 (f ( for •••

increasing combinationa tension can make these moves extremey necessary and one may not aways

Bac B ackk  the the knig knight ht  ) . Moreover, by expoiting the open position position of the Back ( White) White ) 45

 

Chess Mle Mlegame game Combinat Combinations  ions 

king, White obtains the possibility of holding on to a str s trong ong ini initia tiativ tivee for a long time. A high standard of defence is required from the defending side in order to avoid defeat. If there were such cases in the history of this combination, they were considerably rarer than the successful successful conclusion conclusi on of the ata ttack by the initiator of the sacrifice. The illustrations given below show how the attack develops when this combination is carried out. talian Game

White: G.ave Black: M.Chigorin 3rd All-Russian tournament, (Moscow 1903)

1 e4 eS 2 NfJ N6 3 B4 BS 4 d3 Nf6 S Nc3 d6 6 00 Bg4

Black threat Black threatens ens the mov move . . . Nd4, which also folows even on 7 Be3. Meanwhie the pin of the knight hampers White. Whi 8te.Bg5, It was possibeontof3play 7 h3 Bh5 in his tu threatening also the moves g4 an andd Nd5 . After After 8 . . . h6 9 Bx Bxf6 Qxf66 1 0 Nd5 Qxf Nd 5 Qd Qd8 1 1 c3 White has a fuly satisfactory game. The way chosen by alve prevents ven ts the immedi immediate ate threat threat ( . . . Nd4) but does not solve the cardial question about the pin of the knight. This is its weak side. 7 BbS? BbS ? 0  0 8 Be 3

makes three moves with the king's bishop Bc4b5 xc6 , j ust to Bc4b5xc6 exchange it for a knight which whic h has made one move. No way can such an expenditure of time, right in the opening stage, be recommended, but White's sin lay in 7 Bb5. 8 ... Nd4!

Now the bishop on b5 finds itself isolated from the main area of the struggle, while the problem of the pi pinne nnedd knight on  arises with wi th new force. 9 Bxd4 Bx Bxd4 1 0 h3 B BhS hS 1 1 g4?

worse, but theWhite's ther re was wa s noposition basis bas is for forssuch a provocative form of action. He could contend with the pin of the knight by contin continuing uing 1 1 Qe2 and and prep prepararing the tran transf sfer er of the knight, knight, Nd  e3. In the the eve eve n t of 1 1 . . . Bx c 3 1 2 bxc3 White Wh ite manages to liberate the knight by Qe3, but Black maintains a positional posit ional advantage advantage also in in this case after 1 1 Qe2 c6! 1 2 Bc4 Bc4 Bxc3 13 bxc3 d5 14 Bb3 Qa5. Now follows the combination which we saw in the theoretical scheme.

8 Bxc6 was more more consiste consistent, nt, but, in this case, arithmetic woud wou d have have its way. It turns out that White 46  

Chess Ml Mlegam egamee Com Comba batio tions  ns 

1 1 ... Bx Bx c 3

Possibe was aso an immediate 1 1 . . . Nxg Nxg4 1 2 Nxd Nxd 4 e x d 4 1 3 Nd5 Nd 5 (Of course, course, not 13 hxg4 dxc3 1 1 g x h 5 cxb c xb22 1 5 R b1 Q g 5 + and and . . . Q x b 5) 1 3 . . . Ne3! 1 4 Qx Qxh5 h5 Nxf Nxf  15 Rxf c6 or 15 Ba4 c6 16 Nf4 Nd2! and Back, threatening both ... b5 and ... Qg5+! retains an extra exchange. 12 bxc3 Ng4 13 hxg4 Bxg4

This can be caed a theoretica position. However if the queen were on e2 or the king on h, White woud have obtained the possibiity dispute the correctness of thetoknight sacrifice, in the fi firs rstt case by Qe3 , in the second secon d R Rgg   see the the game N imzovichMarsha imzovich Marsha beow. However, in the present theo th eorretica structur structuree , the thr threa eatt . . . f5 makes Back's attack irresistibe. 14 d4!

o as, by paying 1 5 Be2 Be2 unpinning the knight, to endeavour to repuse the attack.e4 14 ... f5 f5 15 Be 2 e 4 1 6 Nd2 Nd2 This retreat of the knight hastens his downfa downfa,, but aso afte afterr 16 Nh2 Nh 2 Bh Bh3 1 7 Kh  Bxf 1 8 Qx Qxf f Qh4 1 5 Kg Rf6 , White woud not be abe to save the game. 16 ... ... Bx Bxe2 e2 1 7 Qxe2 Qxe2 Qg5 + 1 8 Kh f4 White resigned.

In the game MaroczyJanowski, Back's Bac k's sacrific sacrificee o f a knight o n g4

notice some resembance of opening pans. Both ave and and Marocz Maroczyy refr re frai ained ned fro from m an immed im media iate te attack in the centre (d4). For both, the whitesquared bishops, depoyed on the queen's ank, turned turned out to be not very active pieces. The payer of the Back pieces in these games reacted to this sow form of activ act ivity ity with wi th a pin of the knight on  (Bg4) and, after h3 and g4, with a sacrifice of a knight on g4. Tus we observe observe that that a quie qu iet,t, "soid method of operation, pretendi pretending ng ony on y to fortify the centre (d3), but not containing an ounce of initiative, does not prevent, but more quicky faciitates, the creation of combinationa natio na pans p ans fro from m the th e opponent's opponent's side. Taking the th e opportunity, opportunity, we therefore want to repeat once again the advice which we systematicay systematicay iustrate i ustrate in the pages of this book: the best way to prevent a combinationa initiati ini tiative ve by the opponent is by ownsinned activity. Both inave andone's Maroczy greaty this respect and a fu fuy y deserved punishpuni shment befe them. panish Game

White: G.Marocz Back: D.anowski (Internationa tournament at Ostende 1905)

1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nc6 3 Bb5 a6 4

was carried out in consideraby more compicted conditions conditions.. Comparing the opening stage of both games, it wi not be diicut to

Ba4 Nf6 5 d3

Besides this very quiet continuation, White has at east three acive possibiities: 5 d4, 5 Bxc6, 5

47  

Chess Mdleg Mdlegame ame Comb Combato atons  ns 

troubesome pin.

00. One cannot ignore aso such moves as 5 Nc3 and 5 Qe2, which ikewise might provide a basis for the organisation of active pay inthe centre. The motive of the "soid move chosen by Maroczy can can be sought in various directions, even in the touament standings at the moment the present game was payed. To a appearances, Maroczy did not strive for a sharpening of the game against a temperamenta opponent.

Now Back seizes the initiative. It is unfavourabe for White to exchange on cS , and he is forced forced to advance the attacked pawn. But then Back obtains the important eS square for his knight, whie in addition to this he has a mobie, active group of pawns on the queen's's fan queen fankk  three three again against st two. In the ight of deveoping events, the pin on  becomes a the more and more tiresome.

5

16 d5 Ba5!

••

B5 6 0 0 d6 7 Be3

After nevertheess appropriate preparation, White intends to begin an advance in the t he centre and and pay d4. 7 ... b5 8 Bb3 Bg4

A pin which weakens the strength of White's pressure after d4. On the other hand, Back provokes White into h3 and g4. Protracted manoeuvring is required to rid himsef of the pin in any other way, and, with the active depoyment of Back's pieces, this woud be dangerous. White is orientated towards towa rds the advance advance d4 d4,, and this is correct. However, in this ight, White's 5th move must be subject to criticism. 9 c3 Qe7 Qe7 10 N Nbd bd22 Rd8   Bd5 Nb8 12 d4 exd4!

A sharp and farsighted repy. 13 xd4 Bb6 14 Bb3

14

••

0 0 15 Re Re  5 !

Back frees the cpawn, pins the the advance second of White knight and finay creates a direct threa thr eatt . . . N xe4 xe4 ( if, if, on this, this, Bg BgSS , then . . . QxgS ! ) . 17 B2 Nbd7 18 h3 Bh5 19 Bf4

On 19 g4 woud have foowed the combination 19 ... Nxg4 20 hxg4 Bxg4 and aready he cannot pan p an now 2 1 B, in vi view ew of 2 1 . . . Bxd2 Bx d2 2 2 Bxd2 Bxd2 NeS. 19

•

4 20 Re3 Re3 Bb6 Bb6 2 1 Re

The rook The rook manoeuvre pursues the t he aim of freeing the knight on d2 fr from om the pin. pin . It goes wi without thout saying thatt White agrees tha agrees to a repeti repetition tion of moves. 21

•• •• 

Ne5! 22 Bxe5

He cannot endure the knight on e S , but now now the Back Back bishop bishop on b6 becomes a douby threatening

piece.

Ti midyy payed ! There is no need Timid for White White to fear fear the capture capture on dS dS . It woud have been usefu usefu to pay 1 4 Qc2 , i n order order t o rid himse hi mseff of the

22

•

dxe5 23 g4

This move is not in accord with White's carefu, circumspect pay 48

 

Chesss Mdl Ches Mdlegam egamee Comb Combat atns  ns 

in this game. I t is not based on the conviction that White can refute thee attack th attack afte afterr . . . N xg4 xg4 ; Maroczy, Maroczy, apparenty, simpy came to the concusion that his position was unsatisfactory and the best chance of saving the game was to try to provoke the opponent into a piece sacrifice. It seems to us that to a certain extent he is right. After 23 Nf Bg 24 Ng3 Ng3 NhS ( . . . Ne8d Ne8d is stro stronge nger) r) 25 N xh5 Bxh B xh55 22 g4 Bg Bg , White woud have got into a very diicut di icut posi position tion.. From the point of view of this psychoogica moment,asthe movea 23 g4 can be regarded amost forced continuation.

23

••

woud have prba woud prbab byy payed payed 23 .  . Bg.

24 hxg4 Bxg4 25 Kg2 Rd6 26 Rg f6 27 Qe

Obvi ousyy in rder to incude Obvious incu de the the bishop in the defence of the  point, via d 1 . On 2 7 Kf Kf , which which oks o ks better, cud cud fow 27 . . . h5. 27

•

Rf4!

Whi te has White ha s no defe defenc ncee against 28 . . . f5 f5 29 ex exf5 Bx + 30 Nx e4.

28 Kf Bxf3 29 xf3 Rxf3 30 Rg2 Qh4 31 Kg

Or 3  Ke2 Ke2 Qh5 and Back wins. 3 1 ... .. . Rh3 Whit Whitee resig resigne ned. d. In bth the games we have given, the kniht sacrifice prved t be justified, but the concusion shoud not be drawn frm this that the idea of unpinning the knight by h3 an and g4 g4 ( .  . h a n d .  . g5) is fauty. The unpinning of the knight requires preparation, which ave and Maroczy did nt manage to carry ut. In the foowing exampes we see how the knight sacrifice on g4 suers a fiasco.

Nxg4

We do not give this move an excamation mark for the simpe reason that equay good woud havee been hav been tthe he simpe simpe . . . Bg Bg with the threa threatt . . . h5. If 24 Nh4 , then then 24 . . . Nxd5 25 N xg xg fxg fxg 2 eexd xd55 Rx with an irresistibe attack.

Four Knights Game

White: Nim%ovich Back: Maha (San Sebastian 1912)

1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nc6 3 Nc3 Nf6 4 Bb5 B 5 0 0 0 0 6 Bxc6 dxc6 7 d3 Bg4 8 h3 Bh5

(ee diagram next page

With his stye of pay, Janowski coud not choose this way. However, Rubinstein or chechter and even Capabanca

9 Kh!

A preparatory move! move ! If at once 9 g4, then 9 . . . N xg4 xg4 0 hxg hxg4 Bxg4 Bxg4 49

 

Chess Mdlegam Mdlegamee Combinat Combinations  ions 

White's hands. 1 1 hxg4 Bxg Bxg4 4 12 R Rgg  Qg6

On 1 2 . . . f5 , Whi Whitte wou woudd ha have ve payed simpy 13 exf5. Now, however, Back threatens check on h5, and White's repy,a stricty speaking, is forced. 13 Rxg4

and Back's attack is highy dangerouss since rou since . . . f5 is threat threatene ened. d. 9



Qd6

Back cannot prevent the move g4,, after which White woud thr g4 th reaten the active knig ht manoeuvre knight manoeuvr e Ne2g3f5. Nimzovich time and again successfuy carried out this pan in his practi practice. ce. Theref Therefore, ore, instead of the queen move which wh ich has veryy obscure aims, ver aims, Marsha shoud pay 9 ... Bxc3 and then ... Nd7, wi th a future trans transfer fer o f t h e knight to e, after ter . . . Re8. Re8. 10 g4

If N imzovich imzov ich had thought that the knight sacrifice on g4 was dangerous for him, then he woud have payed the preiminary 10 Rg 1 . From From the point of view of the consistent con sistent carrying out of the pan, p an, this was aso the most expedient continuation. 10



Nxg4

Even with Even wi th the the kin on h  , Back does not risk much by sacriicing the knight for two pawns. Restora-

13 Rg3 is dangerous, in view of 1 3 . . . Qh Qh55 + 1 4 Kg2 Bx Bxc3 1 5 b xc xc33 f5 and White's defence becomes diicut. 13 Qxg4 14 Nh2 Qxd + 1 5 

Nxd

Bac B ackk has has rook and and two pawns for for two knights, at worst can for be regarded as which materia equaity him. Consequenty, aso in this game the knight sacrifice justifies itsef, but since Back nevertheess oses this game, we wi give a few more moves here. 15



fS?

In an exceent position, Back surprisingy gives himsef an isoated pawn, but the main thing is that a stro s trong ng piece base on e4 is set up for for the opponent's knights. knights . And a this for a shadowy attack on the  pawn, whie possiby aso even wi th a dream of once agai againn creating threats to the king. As a resut of Back's thoughtess move, the initiative passes to White. 16 exf exfS fS fS 1 7 Be3 Ra

Aso now Back Back coud sti sti put up serious resistance by 7 ... h5, and

if 1 8 Nf , then 1 8 . . . h4. Inste Instead ad of this, he makes a rutine move, White's knight gets to e4 without hindrance, and his advantage be

tion of of materia mater ia equaity equa ity was, in any vent, assured for him. On the othher hand, ot and, aft after 10 . . . Bg 1 1 Ne 2 the initiative woud find itsef in 0  

Chess Mdlegame Mdlegame Comb Combatns  atns 

comes decisive.

On top of everything, Back has

2 6 Rx  + K Kgg  7 Rg 7 + Kh Kh 2 Rxb7 Rx b7 + Kg Kg  2 9 Rg7 + Kh 3 0 Rg55 + Kh7 Rg Kh 7 3 1 Rxh5 Rxh5 K Kgg6 32 Rh3 Kx 33 Rxh6+

rther entanged 21 Be7 22 Ne4his rook. Back Ba ck was soon forced forced to give gi ve up the exchange, but ony aid down his arms on the 4th move. We have examined three types of theoretica theoretica combination, combinatio n, but th theory of combinations is not limited to these. uch themes as smothered mate, which we ooked at earier, are theoretica; aso

Andpawns. WhiteThis easiy expoited his extra combination is so efective in its resuts and so striking in its form, that it forces a payer to be extremey aert with regard reg ard to his g7 g7 square (or ( or g2) g2 ) when w hen there is a ombinationa attack of bishop and rook. And nevertheess the "mi combination sti finds itsef a pace from time to time in tournament tourn ament practi practice. ce.

reating to socaed theoretica combinations isis the socae d "mi "mi , , which was carried out in the weknown game, Torre-sker, payed in the internationa touament at Moscow in 1925. As a scheme, we give the end of this game.

In theofcourse of the chapters this book, the future reader wi come acros wi acros some m more ore combi combi nations which can, in their content, be paced in the area of of theory. In genera, however, if we broach the subject of the interreation of theory with the eements of combinations, then it is possibe to say that theoretica investigations and generaisations come into cosest contact with the motives of combination. There is amost no motive which has not been exposed to, and investigated by, the thoughts of a chesspayer. Likewise, combinationa themes end themseves to theoretica investigation. In return, in respect of ideas,, theory sti ideas st i cannot cannot say a great great dea.

 Nf Rh5 Rh5 + 19 Kg2 Rh4 20 Ng3 h5 h5?? 2 1 f3

000

24 B Qxh5 25 Rxg7 Rxg 7 + Kh

Now the rook rook,, by repeated discodisco vered checks from the g7 square,

wins interest. with back theThis sacrificed combinationa materia form of harmony in the action of rook nd bishop is given the graphic name of of "the mi m i. .

If itand hassomehow been possibe generaise cassifytocertain ideas, then thousands of them remain outside the orbit of theory, since repetition of ideas is rare. 51

 

Chapt Cha pter er Seven istor ist or  of Combin Combina aon ons. s. The Im Immo mort rtal al Ga Game me. .  astei eiec eces es of tthe he End of the 1 9t 9th h Centur ur.  .  Up to the 19th century and in the first 3035 years of the 19th century, combinations were the basic creative method in the chess strugge. Even Phiidor, pioneer of the first positiona thought, was essentiay a briiant exponent of combinationa methods of pay. Ony in the 40's did the deveopment of chess thought ead to the intrroduction int oductio n into the chess process process of many notions about positiona pay, pay with a pan based on these notions. notions. Masters of this time t ime , in the first pace the Engishmen, taunton, Wyvi, Wiiams, and then aso the Germans, Lasa, Bi-

weapons,s, these had to b e consideweapon consideraby improved and perf perfected ected.. Thi process of renewa came to be noticed particuary briianty, in approximatey the midde of the 1 9th ccentur entury, y, i . e . rough roughy y from the first inteationa touament whic wh ichh took took pace pace in Lond London on 1 85 1 . This touament proceeded under the banner of positiona pay and neither nei ther the briiant briia nt combinationa combinationa thoughts of its winner, the outstandingg master of the German outstandin G erman chess schoo, Adof Anderssen, nor the eegant, bod pay of the Hngarian zen, coud change the positiona background of the tour-

guer some somewh ater, L. Pausen, and, proved to what beatknowedgeabe and subte apoogists of positiona principes in practica pay. However, a of them at the same time inherited the historica ine and were firstcass exponents of combinationa combina tiona creativity. creativity. CombinCombiningg the att in atter er with positiona principes, they possessed weapons against which the representatives

nament, guarded guarded such piar pi ars s of Engish chess as bytaunton, Wiiams and Wyvi Wyvi  . These These three three aso occupied the next paces to Anderssen in the touament. And this occurred even despite the fact that the introduction to the tournament was a stunning combination.. We are ref tion referring err ing to the game, game , AnderssenKieseritsky, payed on the eve of the touament and

of chessgame art, for the concept "chess game waswhom equivaent to the concept "combinationa pay, proved poweress. In order to win from now on with combinationa

which, in the history Game. of chess,It isis caed the "Immorta precisey this game which we choose as a starting point for expounding the history of combi 52

 

Chess Mdlegame Combat Combato os  s 

nation in the second haf of the 19th century. It s usefu for the reader to know know that in many pubipub icaions the text of the game is

of an advantage for White in this variation, variat ion, then it is ony an insignificant one.

given incor the textbooks of Euwe, incorrecty Retirecty and ( Em. Lasker, the magazine hakhma by N. I. Grekovv ) , wi th a wrong ko wrong order of moves. moves . It shoud aso be taken into in to account that this game, which asted about 1  hours, ought to be cassed as as a "casua game. Thus Anderssen's profound execution of the combinationa idea deserves, a the more, high estimation.

Back threatens Now 8 Kg 1 is ba badda incheck viewon of g3. ... Qb + ; however no no wo wors rsee than the continuation chosen bAnderssen was 8 Rg.

Bish's Gambit

White: A.Andesen Back: L.Kieseritsky (London 85 1)

1 e4 e5 2 f4 exf4 3 e4

The King's Gambit, at east at the time, ed to a ivey combinationa game. ide by side with the Evan Ev anss Gambit, Gambi t, it was the fa favourite opening of Anderssen.

7 d3 Nh5

8 Nh4 Qg5

A doube attack, reckoning on 9 Nf5 c and, on any retreat of the bishop, bish op, 10 . . . d5 with an initiative. Kieseritsky does not take into account a circumstan circumstance ce which, it is true, woud not beme. easy8 .to. . g notice even in a serio serious us game. ga was best. 9 Nf5 c6 10 g4 Nf6

Bac k aso reckone on this Back th is posiposi tion. What Wha t can White do now? On 1 1 Ba4 Ba 4 fo o ows 1 1 . . . g aand nd th th en . . . N xg4 with an obviou obviouss advant advant-age for Back.

3 ... Qh4+ 4 Kf b5

This countergambit has some foundation: oundation: the White b isho ishopp is di diverted from a strong positon to an undefended square and Back gets time to deveop his queen's bishop. b ishop. However the further course of the strugge tus out so tragicay for Back that neither this nor any other factor pays any roe at a.

1 1 Rg  !

Chigorin, never very generous with his praise, characterised this rook manoeuvre as a geniusike pan and provided Anderssen's combinationa move with two

5 Bxb5 Nqueen 6 Nf3 Qh6imited in Here the is too

its possibiities. More promising ook o oked ed  . . . Qh5 Qh5 and on 7 Qe2 Qxb5 8 Qxb5 Ba. If one can speak 5 3 5 3    

Chess Mleg Mlegame ame C Combinati ombinations  ons 

excamati on marks. excamation marks. A rare rare event in Chigorin's evauations! Anderssen's idea i dea is indeed very very deep and and it is hard to bame Kieseritsky for not

Back. On 1 ... Bb7 woud have foowe oowedd 1 7 NxbS with the threats threats of Nd+ and Nc7+. Reativey better woud woud be 1 . . . Na, but aaso so

being abe to fathom it out to the end.

in this thiwith s case case continuatio continuation Bd! thethe threat eS, eadsnto1 a7 decisi dec isive ve atta attack ck.. 1 7 . . . Bxd is ceary not possibe in view of 18 NdS QeS QeS 1 9 d4. If, how howev ever er,, 1 7 . . . Bb7, t h en 1 8 g S Qe Qe 1 S NxbS Nx bS ith i th the irresistibe threat Nbd4.

11

•

xb5

Ba acck has has nothin nothingg ese. ese. If 1 1 . . . N xe4, so as, afte afterr 1 2 dxe4, to tak takee the bishop, then White wins by continuing 13 QdS with a doube threat of taking the t he rook and winnwi nning the queen after Nd+. It is inte in terrestin estingg ttha hatt on   . . . Nxe4 Nxe4 White achieves a win aso a so by means of the oss simpe to the of a 12 piece pieQe2, ce fo forwhich Back Ba ck eads ( as a minimum, minimu m, since White sti hods a dang da nger erou ouss initiative) . 1 2 h4 Qg Qg6 6 1 3 h5 5 1 4 Qf3 Ng8

For the suering which fe to Back's ot, he wants to at east maintain the extra materia. A egitimate desire! 15 Bxf4 Qf6 16 Nc3 B5

Back cannot defend himsef against the invasion of the knigt on dS . If, fo for examp exampe, e, 1  . . . N e7 , then 17 Nd+ Kd8 18 eS. Nevertheess Kieseritsky's move is bad, since it deprives the g7 pawn of defence and the more so that the simpe 1 7 d4 decisivey refutes refutes the aggrressive agg essi ve intent intent of the thrust. thrust . The ony justification for such moves

1 7 Nd5

Apart from the above mention men tioned ed mov movee 1 7 d4 d4 , White White wins here by means means of 1 7 Bd with the threatssince, of gS on ad17eS....Back hepess, Bxd,is again ag ain 1 8 NdS is decis decisive. ive. 1 7 ... Qxb Qxb2 1 8 Bd6 Bd6!!

The best continuation of the attack, which is sated with combinations. 18 ... Bxg

The bishop cannot be taken in vi view ew of of mate in four four moves. Nu Nume me-rouss comment rou commentator atorss of o f this h istoric gamee maintained gam maintained that that afte afterr 18 . . . Qxa 1 + 1 9 Ke2 Ke 2 Qb2 Q b2 Back obtains chances of saving the game. However, after the simpe 20 Kd2 Bxg 21 eS is obtained approximatey the same picture as in the game. White threatens, after 20 Kd2, not ony to take the bishop but aso the deady Rb 1 . The There re is is no apparent dierence.

can they ion are ofusuay the resutbeof that a recognition recognit the hopeessness of one's position. Indeed, there does not seem to be any a ny sati s atisf sfactory actory continuat contin uation ion for

19Cutting e5! o the queen from the

g7 point (the method of intererence) and preparing a fina sacrifice of the queen. 54

 

' Ches Chesss M Mdl dlegame egame Com Comba batio tions  ns 

19  Qxa + 20 Ke2

White threatens mate in two moves, 21 Nxg7+ and Bc7 mate, and mate in three mves, 21 N xg7+Kieseritsky Kd 8 2 2 Qfnoticed + ! Nxf Nx fony  2 3 Bthe e7 mate. first threat, as the more obvious, and defended himsef ony against that. 2 0    N Naa6

Defending the c7 square, but getting mated from the other side. The best defence was the move 20 ... Ba, pointed out by teinitz. Thee idea Th id ea f the th e mov movee is to fr free ee the c sq squa uarre for the kin king. g. 20 . . . b, withh the same objective wit objective,, i s unsatisunsatisctor c toryy in view v iew of 2 1 N xg7 + Kd Kd88 22 Qxf7. On any move of Back's king's knight, and there are no other ways to defend against the threat of Qe8 mate, White forces mate ma te by N e + . However, aso aft after er 20 . . . Ba Ba Back Back must ose, ose, as shown by the foowing anaysis,

24 Nd mate o 23 ... Ke8 24 Nd+ f8 25 Qxf7 mate is threatene te ned. d. ) 22 . . Bb Bb ( (rr 22 . . . Qc3 Qc3 23 7+ Qc7 24 Nc7 xc7 25 Qa8 Bc 5 2 Nd Bxd Qc3 27 exd exd24  +Qxb8+ Kc8 28 Qxa7) 23 Qxa8 Qc8 25 Qxc8 Qx c8 + Kxc8 2 Bf8! f8 ! Kb 7 ( if 2 . . . Nh, then 7 7 Nd+ Nd + Kd8 Kd8 28 Bxg7 with the three threats  Bf mate, Bxh and Bxh8. On 2 . . . h f ws ws 27 27 Nd+ Kd8 28 N xf7 xf7 + Ke8 29 Nxh8 Kx 30 Ng+ Kf7 31 K and the reaisatin of the extra pawn des nt presen pre sentt any any diicutes diicutes here. here. ) 2 7 Bxg7 h (as28 eading is 27 Nb4 Nd+ t b8a win 29 Nxf7  7 30 K, and the king penetrates to g withut hindrance) 27 . . . Kxa 2 8 Bx Bxhh 8 h 29 g5 hxg hxg 5 3 0 h  with the win f the the knight. And so even upon the best defence by Kieseritsky, Back's game coud not have been saved. Anderssen's cmbinationa intuition, aestheticay, consideraby raises the artistic vaue f the game. Anderssen created a truy immorta production of chess chess art. It is interesting that cntemporaries,, without mentioning the fac raries factt that they worked on a confused text, subjected Kieseritsky's pay t criticism when he was aready in a osing position, and did not indicate what exacty was the original

cause Back's of th, Kieseritsky's 7th and 8th defeat. moves created diicuties which in the end proved to be insurmountabe. We give the finae.

the variation And of which ongbasic to to Chigorin. so: 20 be... Ba 2 1 Nc7 + Kd8 2 2 Nxa Nxa ! (Pointed out by Chigorin. Now, apart from 23 Qxa8, 23 Bc7+ Kc8 55  

Chess Mdlega Mdlegame me Com Combiatio biations  ns 

2 1 Nxg7 + Kd8 Kd8 22 Q+ ! N Nx xf6 23 Be7 mate

deveopment of deveopment o f positiona thought thought conceing the panning of the game, weaknesses weaknesses of a po posit sition ion.. In tu the question arose about the

A pure economica mate after the sacrifice of the queen, two

improvement of against methods of defence, above a a combinationa attack. O course, wiyniy, ni y, Anderssen Anderssen had to poss possess ess eements of positiona panning, but to the end of his ife his heart and sou beonged to combinationa ideas. This ed to him osing by a big score in 1858 to the young American Morphy, who possessed both combinationa taent and fine

rooks andpieces bishop,was whie not one to of Back's subjected banishment fr from om the arena arena of batte. In this aso ies the immortaity immortaity of the game. Anderssen's enormous combinationa taent won him word fa fame. me . After the game with Kieseritsky soon foowed his game with ufresne, which, in accord with thee beauty th be auty of its concuding conc uding combicombi nation, was dubbed "evergreen. In a number of other games, Anderssen succeeded in carrying out many beautifu combinations. T 0 get her with wi th this it shoud be mentioned that Anderssen was no onger a son of his time. Here it is necessary to expain why his sporting gory was comparitivey shortterm. Anderssen did not keep pace pace

understanding of the positiona strugge. In 18 he ost a match to the young teinitz, future word champin. Just ike Morphy, teinitz possessed possess ed great co combina mbinationa tiona gifts gifts and reativey good good technica pay. p ay. Objectivey, Anderssen at this time was stron stronge gerr than th an teinitz, t einitz, but he underesti underestimat mated ed him hi m and severa games, particuary in the midde of the match, he payed too riskiy. (The score score of the th e match match was +8  in teinitz's favour). The name of teinitz, future author of teaching about positiona pay (see Middle gamee Plan gam Planni nin ng  represented, in the chess word, a briiant combinationa payer. In the inteationa tournament at London 182, his combination in a game

with thewas history ofin chess. thought deveopin deveop intensiv intenChess sivey ey at this time tim e in the direction of of the construction and deepening of theory, perfection of technique,

Mongredien against was hig highy hy vaued by Andessen Ande(Back) ssen himsef (first prizewinner of the touament). Here is this combination:

5  

Chess Mdl Mdlegam egamee Com Comba bans  ns 

of the combination. The ine which whi ch suggests suggests itsef, 2 1 Rf + Ke8 Ke8 22 Bxg+ Rxg 23 Qxg+ Kd7, does not produce a cear resut. 21 ... Ke6 22 Qh3+ K 23 Rf + Ke8 24 Qe6 Rg7 25 Bg5 Qd7 26 Bxg6+ Bxg6+ Rxg6 2 7 Qxg6 Qxg6+ + Kd8 28 R+ Qe8 29 Qxe8 mate.

The diagram poston was reached after the 15th move, which was preceded by the moves  5 g4 fxg fxg4 ? Back went hafway hafway to meeting White's combinationa pan. He shou shoud d have have paye payedd 1 5 . . . Nxe55 1  fxe5 Nxe fxe5 f4 f4 or 1  dxe5 dxe5 Bc8 Bc8 , andd Back coud sstiti def an defend end hi himsef msef successfuy. Thus, to be fair, it is necessary to say that the combination succeeded for teinitz after a direct mistake by Mongredien. Was this not an exampe of teinitz'severy basicay mistaken that ever y combination combinat ion canpremise be preented? This was what teinitz maintained when ater constructing his posit positiona iona theory. theory. In repy to 15 ... fxg4, there folowed: 6 Rxh7 ! N Nxe xe55 1 7 e e55 Kxh7 Kxh7 1 8 Qxg4 Rg8

teinitz had foreseen the aternati na tive ve 18 . . . Qe8 19 Qh5 + Kg Kg88 20

teinitz's pan is beautifu both in content and execution. The period 1 80 1 880 repres represent ented ed years years of of further deveopment of positiona principes, and combinationa creativity, in its od Itaian spirit, graduay gra duay went on on the wane. wane. Let us ookk at a number oo num ber of combinations, combinations, carried out in this period, which hep us to grasp the evoution of combinationa ideas, giving rise to the further deveopment of methodss ooff eva thod evaua uating ting posit positions ions on the new foundations and the need to take into consideration the heightened he ightened roe roe of def defence ence and aso a so the theory of expoit expoiting ing positiona weaknesses. MayetZukertort Mayet Zu kertort (Berin 188)

Bxg Rf7 2 1 Kh 1 Bf8 22 Rg 1 Bg7 Bxg 23 Bh and wins. 19 Qh5 Qh5 + Kg7 Kg7 20 Qh6 + K 2 1 Qh7+

In the diagram poston it is Back's 20th move. Mayet was

In this check ies the fine point 7  5  5 7  

Chess M Mleg legam amee Com Combatio bations  ns 

obviousy not abe to expoit the combinationa motives contained for White i n the King's Gambi Gam bitt and as a resut found himsef no better

White threatens mate in three movess after move after 29 Qxh 7 + , since on 29 . . . Kxh 7 mate is achieve achievedd in two ways wa ys:: ( 1 ) 30 Rh3 Rh3 + and and Rh8 Rh8 mate;

o theair, start. starsince t. A mating mat theme than is in atthe theing White king finds itsef in a hepess state, surroun sur rounded ded by enemy pieces. With Wit h two sma combinations, invoving the sacrifice of the queen, Zukertort soved soved the combinationa probem:

(2) 30 g8(Q)+ precisey becauseand of Rh3 this mate second threat any move of the rook from the   square is useess. But how does does B Back ack defe defend nd him him-sef? Aas there is no defence and thiss one exampe a thi arready disproves teinitz's thesis about the posibiity of o f preventin preventingg any an y combination. Zukertort chose 2 8 Qd6 o n which whi ch foow o owed ed 29 Qxh7 + Kxh7 Kxh7

2 0 Qd6! 2 1 Ba3 Qd3 22 Nd5 Qf + 23 R Rxf xf Ne2 mate mate 

Thi s game This game wa wass the firs firstt tim t imee that the theme of mate with w ith two knights knight s had been carried out in this form. The c ombin mbinat atio iona na ide ideaa  the the transfer of the queen que en from from h to f1  is spectacuar by its suddeness and means of transfer. AndesenZukert (Berin Andesen 189) Anderssen was a great connoisseur and over of the Evans Gambit. In the present game, with a bod attack, he succeeded in achieving a position where the concuding beautifu combination turned out to be irresistibe.

 

30 + + Kg8 3 1 Bh7 + ! Kxh Kxh77 32 Rh3+ Kg8 33 Rh8 mate.

The foowing game between two German romantic masters is interesting because of he scae of the combination. The reader sees a whoe series of mating threats threats,, and the king eaves its passive position to make a forced trip through the whoe board. teinitz Gambit

White: C.Gring Back: H.Minckwi (Wiesbaden 1871)

1 d4 £5 2 e4 e4 3 Nc3 N£6 4 Bg5 e6

Here, 4 . . . c is mor moree ofte oftenn met met in practice, but the organic defect of this continuation is the deay in the deveopment of both fanks. fanks. In

any case, no worse; afterMinckwitz's 5 Nxe4 Be7move  Bd3is b! Back has time aso to dveop his queen qu een's's fank. Interesting Interesting is the t he fofoowing combinationa variation: 58  

Chesss Ml Ches Mlegam egamee Comb Combinat inations  ions 

7 Bxf Bxf Bx Bxff 8 Qh5 Qh 5 + g 9 Q -? 10 N xf + Qxf Qxf 1 1 Qxa8 Qx Qx + 1 2 d  Nc5 1 2 Ne 2 ith advan advanta tage ge ttoo White. Howeve However,r, instea insteadd of 9 . . .

aso ose, with his pieces "frozen on the queen's fank fank,, but nevertheess, by keeping keeping the queen queen in pay , he might hae put up a more

00, Bac shoud shoud pla Bx and, Back if 1 0kNd + , tplay heny 91 0. . . . .Bxd4 cxd4! d! 1 1 Qxa8 Qxa8 Bxb2 Bxb2 1 2 Rb Rb 1 Bc3 Bc3 + 1 3 Kf Kf Nc. This variation aready ooks more promising for Back.

successfu resistance.

5 Bx Qxf6 6 Nxe4 6

Back wants to gain time by attackin ta ckingg the knight, knigh t, but tthis his move is not good. Even the simpe continuation 7 Ng3 foowed by Bd3 leads to an advantage for White. Corr orrect ect was was  . . . Qh, Qh, and it is not easy for White to expoit his advantage in deveopment. 7 Bd3

The beginning of The of a mu m utitimove, move, finey and deepy deep y cacu cacuate ated, d, beautifu tif u combinatio combi nation. n. O course, Back is not obiged to go hafway to meeting the opponent and take on g2. Aso worth considering now was the retreat of the queen to h, h , disregarding the oss of tempo, but  inckwit inckwitzz apparenty did d id not foreforesee the opponent's opponent 's grand pan p an to its  extent and reckoned reckoned ony on 7 ... Qxg2 8 Ng3 Qd5; true, even in this case Back does not have an easyy ife, eas ife, but, but, after after paying paying . . . Qg Qg on the previous move, Minckwitz had aready decided to be consistent.

12 Nf6+ K

On 1 2 . . . Ke Ke77 fo fooows the main branch of the combination: 13 Nd5 + ! ! exd exd55 14 Qh7 Qh7 + K Kff 1 5 Qxgg + Ke7 1  Qg5 Qx Qg5 + Kf Kf7 1 7 Bg+ Bg+ Kg8 18 Qxd5+ Kg7 19 Qf7+ Kh 20 Qh7+ Kg5 21 f4+ Kxf4 22 Qh4+ K 22 Be4 mate. If, If, in this variation, Back pays 1 7 . . . Kg Kg7, 7, the then 18 Be8 + Kh7 Kh7 1 9 Qg + ! Kh8 2 0 Qh Qh55 + Kg7 Kg7 2 1 Qf7+ h8 22 Qxf8+ h7 23 Qf7+ Kh8 24 Q+ with a quick mate. 13 + 

On 1 3 . . . Ke 7 fo folo lows ws aaga gain in 1 4 Nd5+! 1 4 Qx Qx + Kg5 1 5 4 4+

An even quicker way of forcing matee is by 1 5 h4+ mat h4 + g4  othe otherw rwis isee



mate tw m18 oves 1 Kh1 Be2 +19Kh3 Kh 1 7 Qin+two oh 2move Qsg3+ B B3 mate. This i tte miss of Gring is, perhaps, the ony speck in the combination, which contemporaries

7  Qxg2 hQh5+ Q 1 0 Qx Qx  Q Qx xg g6 + 9   Qe5! Kd2 Q

Now itit is a forced. Aft After 1 1 . . . Qg2 or 11 ... Qxh2 Back woud 5  5 9 9   

Chess Mdleg Mdlegame ame Combat Combatns  ns 

caed ca ed briiant. briiant . 15 Kg4 16 Be2+ Kh3 17 Qh6 Qh 6 + Kg Kg2 1 8 5 + K Kxh xh22 1 9 BO Qf Qf 2 0 Qh4+ Kg  •

20+ ...Qg2 Qh3 21 Qxg2 Q+ mate. 2 1Or Qg3 + 23 We give the fina position.

The whoe of this wonderfu combination contains severa thematic mates, each more beautifu than the other. A very eective combination was carried out in the game HampeMeitner (Vienna 1873). Back obtained a draw. I n this combination shoud be mentioned White's accurate defence (see Chapter 5). This game was one ooff the ast, a st, in the period we are are ooking at, to be payed in a purey combinationa spirit, but even here is fet the increased roe of defence. In the 1880's the majority of games presented themseves as a

maoeuvring and generay circumspect pay. The period 18801899 was characterised by many combinations buit a foundation of pay, new posistrategy, on purposefu pan of tiona manoeuvres. To the aesthetics of combination was added the absoute correctness demanded of it. The beauty of combinations became deeper, because the combinations themseves came to be not sefcontained factors but appeared as a component ogica part in the positiona pan of pay. Combinations became becam e not a product of stye sty e but an inevitabiity of any chess process. The, as it were, organicay inuenced even the creative thought of the fightin fightin side and entered into a new historica stage of their deveopment, which shoud be caed the panning or even more accuratey the positiona stage. We begin an investigation inve stigation of this period with a very beautifu combination which was carried out in the game Mason MasonWinawer from the inteationa intea tiona touament at Vienna 1882. After 35 QhS Rf the game reached the foowing critic critica a position. White has two extra pawns, but the very active position posit ion of the Back knight on cS, weakness of the White fS fS , e3 , a2 pawns, pawns ,

process of astricty positiona at times quite so, instrugge, which was aready widey expoited open ines, weakness of squares, and showing the irst tendencies to

the d strong e4 position and ion a3, wou woud seemoutposts to bring on to to the posit some motives for equiibrium. Howeve, the decisive deci sive factors prove t be te precais state  the 0

 

Chess Che ss M le legam gamee Co Comb mbia iatio tions  ns 

Back king and the powerfu depoyment of the White bishop, which stimuate stim uatess White Whi te to ook ook for for a combination.

rank, White wins the queen and with it aso the game. 44 Ka 45 Qxg and Back soon rsigned. In this same tournament, Winawer ( Back) in a game game against against teinitz was abe to demonstrate a form of defence against the combinationa attack of the future future word champion. It shoud be noted that, in the Vienna touament 1882, teinitz and Winawer divided first and second prizes. The present game is one of two games of the 

There foowed:

40 Rxg5 Rxg5 hxg hxg55 4 1 Qh7 + Nd7

On 41 ... Kd8 coud foow 42 Rxb8 Qxb8 43 Qh8+ Kc7 44 Qg7 + Kc8 45 Qxf Qxf Qb Qb  + 4 Kh2 Qxa2 47 4 7 Qxd Qc4 48 f f aa22 49   and mate is inevitabe. 42 Bxd7 Qg

Bad iiss 42 . . . Qxd7 43 43 Rc4 Rc4 + Kd8 44 Qh8+ Qe8 45 Qxf+ with a quick win. aso the continuation However chosen chos en by Winawer meets with wi th an eegant refutation.

match opponents for first exchanged prize, in which victories. the The game went ike this.

43 Rb7+!

French Defence

In this surprising, beautifu sacrifice of a rook are combined, in one move, two combinationa methods: diversion of the rook from defence of the queen and uring of the king to the the white whi te square b 7 ,

White: W.ini Back: . Winawer (Vienna 1882)

1 e4 e6 2 e5

A very od cntinuation which cannot cann ot be refuted refuted by simp si mpee means.

ee diagram next column

In any case, practicaly speaking, has brought White many interest-it ing victories.

43

2

which introduces the possibiity of a doube check (Bc8+). 

Kxb7 44 Bc+!



 3 d4 c5 4 dxc5

In the game game PoockT Po ockT arrasch, arrasch ,

By an interception on the 8th 1  

Chess Mleg Mlegame ame Com Combination binations  s 

from te internatinal tounament at Hastings in 895, Wite cntinued ere 4 Bd3 and, and, on 4    fS , 5 g4! wit a nice initiative

wit ceck Oterwise he would ave played 7 Ne4, and, if 7  K  ten 8 Nd6 + wit a draw Als nt witut iterest is te

4 Bxc5 5 Nc3 6 Bf4 Qb6 7 ... Qd2 Bxf2 + Qc7 Qxf2 Qxb2 9 Kd22 ! Qxa l 1 0 Nb5 Na Kd Na6 6 11 Nd6+ K 1 2 Bxa6 bxa6 1 3 Qc5

cntinuatin 7 ne Nf, reply, n wic Black as nly 7 ................ Ng6, and, if 8 Nf4, ten 8 Q2 and tere is apparently n decisive atack fr Wite, wereas Blacks material advantage is igly signiicant

White as obtained a dangerus inititative for te ecange 13 ... Ne7

17 ... Qx2

Winawer cnducts te defence in wrkmanlike fasin 8 Qf6 is met by   Qd6 + and  NfS  Bf4 Qh5 ! 19 xf6 xf6 Nd5 20 Qd+ Kg7 21 Qa5 Nxf4 22 Qc3 + e5 23 Nxf4 Qg5 24 g3 Rf 2 5 Ne4 Qe7 26 Nd Nd55 Qe6 Qe6 27 2 7 Nc7 Qh6+ White resigned. 14 Ne2

An interesting cmbination Of curse, Gring's duble rok sacrifice crif ice was was wellknw well knwnn t teini t einitz tz Te idea f isolating te ppnent's queen in tis way is quite correct wen tere is an attack n an insecure enemy king However, as sown by te furter curse of te game, teinitz tei nitz did nt calculate te combinatin to the end 14 ... Q Qxhl xhl 15 ex gxf6 1 0 Bh6+ Kg 17 Qd4

Winawer demnstrated in tis game w muc te art of defence ad grwn in te second alf of the 9t century As we ave alreay pinted ut earlier, tis led grwt f cmbinatinal art t itselftCmbinatins nt nly became precise, crrect and interesting, but te artistic value f tem was increased Below we present five games, played pla yed in in te perid perid 883 883 89 8966 , where te cmbination cmbination carried out was called a true masterpiece

English Opening

.Zukertort Wite: Black: .Backbue tenatinal Turnaent nn

This move is based n a miscalculation teinitz eplained eplained his mistake by the fact tat he did not ntice that, after 7  Qxh2 8 Qxf66 , Black Qxf Black takes takes the knight on o n d6

188 1 c

62  

Chess Mdlegam Mdlegamee Comb Combnation nations  s 

This particuary positiona pening was widey practiced by Engish masters in the first internaiona tournament in London

which woud ead to a certain weakening of White's queen's ank. Finay, after NbSxd6, Back, by taking the knight with wi th the cpawn,

 85 1 . Henc Hencee the name name of of the the openopening.

Blackbue aows the exchange of the backsquared bishop for hite's queen's que en's knight (after 0 NbS ) . I t is not so simpe to say whether or not this decision is right. rig ht. The Th e fo foowing owing considerations spea sp eakk in i n favour of it: White Wh ite,, for the exchan exc hange ge of a piece pi ece of equa equa  vvau aue, e, ust u st ose ose two tw o tempi temp i , sinc s ince, e, yo youu see see , it is not possible to maintain that

obtains cie for operations with his the rooks. And yet, despite the weightness of the given considertions, Backburne's decision must be considered, at east, debatabe. It woud be right if White's manoeuvre NbSxd6 were a separate, independent operation. Meanwhie the exchange actuay carried out by Zukertort is the initia ink of a deep pan of attack, the execution of which brings Back to a terribe combinationa combinati ona catastrophe. catastrophe. White' Whi te'ss pan consists of the the preparation of a pawn oensive oensive in the centre by means of Nd2, £  Qc2, Rae 1 , Bd3 Bd3 and, fi finay, nay, e4. With the bishop on d6 d6 and pawn on c7 , this compicated pan comes up agai ag ains nstt the the anti antido dote te . . . cS . If Ba Back, ck,

the bishopknigh onght d6 is stronger than th anBack the White kni t on c3  this is one consideration. The other consists of the fact that, with the ove o ve NbS Nb S , White Whi te gives up, even even if teporariy, to Black's control the ipor ip orta tant nt cent centra rall poi point nt  the e4 suare. su are. One aso cannot cannot ignore this ou  ought ght with w ith his  0th move Ba Back ck inues to mobilise his forces,

inst in stea eadd9of9 . . . Qe7 pa pay ewould d 9 ... cS or ... a6, thenhad White have to think a ittle over another pan in connection connection with the moves a3, b4, while, in the event of an immedia imme diate te 9 . . . cS , to play play  0 dxc dxcSS , in order to open the diagonal for the queen's bishop and organise, after  0 . . . bxcS , pres pressu sure re on the the cS pawn.

 e6 2 e3 N 3 N b6 4 Be2 Bb7 5 0 0 d5 6 d4 Bd6  

The game has deveoped at a slow tempo, and even Backbue, creato cre atorr of many beautifu beau tifu combinacombi nations, set an exampe of the new sitiona approach to the process of the strugge. 7 Nc3 Nc 3 0  0 8 b b33 Nbd Nbd77 9 Bb2 Qe7

ecting rooks and developing

In the tense situation created

e queen new, it handy pos ition itio n for to it, awhere i tmore can support thee adva th advanc ncee . . . eS , while on the the other hand it i t creates the posi positional tional threat thr eat . . . Ba3 Ba3 , the carry carrying ing out of

upon this pay, it would be be the hard hardadto talk about anyone having vantage, since the opening stage of the game was played by both opponents sufficiently wel and in accor 63

 

Chesss Mle Ches Mlegam gamee Com Combia biation tions  s 

dancee wi danc with th the the new new posit po sitio iona na prinpri ncipes. 10 N5 Ne4

This knight thrust, which essenessentiay tieasier ay gives Back nothing, for White to carry makes out theit abovementioned pan. At the same time, the adva advanc ncee . . . eS at at the pres present ent moment, moment, afte afterr 1 1 dxeS NxeS 12 Nxd6 cxd6, eads to an advantage for White (a piece base on d4, weakness of Back's cente pawns). It is not easy to suggest anything usefu for Back ere, since rook manoeuvres aong the 8th rank aso ook quite pointess, but, apparenty, it was nevertheess necessary to untie the knot in the centre cent re by means means of 10 . . . cS c S , and, if 1 1 Nxd Nx d6 Q xd 6 1 2 NeS Ne S , t h e n 1 2 . . . cxd4 cx d4 1 3 exd4 exd4 dxc4, dxc4, giving the the opponent hanging hangin g pawns. 1 1 Nxd6 Nxd6 cxd6 1 2 Nd2! Nd2! Nd Nd  13  Nxd2 14 Qxd2 dxc4

The ony possibiity of somehow doing against thee4.im-If pendingsomething threat of of the advance White takes with wi th the bishop on c4, c4 , then the cfie is opened and Back obtains obt ains an exit for rook operations. If, hwever, 15 bxc4, then the pawn on c4 might serve as an object of attack. 15 Bxc4 d d55

The fact that this move imits

coud first of a pay 16 Bd3 or 16 Rae 1 and thereby secure the advance of of his centra pwns. Back's task is to keep the e4 point under maximum contro andthisBackburne's move fuy meets task. 16 Bd3 Rfc8

Back pays routiney, not foreseeing the strength of the impending hurricane, but how can he create a covering detachment ? The c onti ontinu nuaati tin n 1 6 . . . Qd6 1 7 Ra Raee 1 Nd7 18 e4 dxe4 19 fxe4 eS 20 Bc4 wud maintain the initiative for White. 1 7 Ra Rae l Rc7 18 e4

The oensive oensive begins begins,, but b ut,, as wi wi  be apparent ater, Backburne has thought thou ght up a sharp sha rp and, as it seems, a highy promising pan of defence. 18

••

Rac8 19 e5 Ne8 20 f4 g6

An immediate 20 fS aso woud not give a satisfactory defence, due to 21 exf6 Nxf6(e2) (21with ... Qxf6 fS) 22 2t2fSReS! Qe the22threat threa . Ne4 23 2 1 Re3

Provoking the repy which immediatey foows. If Back does not pay 21 ... fS at once, then, after 22 Rfe 1, this move wi aready be hampered, and, without it, it wi be diicut to conduct a defence. 21

•

f5

impy g was threatened.

the activity of the bishop on b7 (supposedy!) pays fo Of course course, , Back coud fono r theroe. present payy 1 5 . . . Rfc8, pa Rfc8, n an imm immedi ediat atee 16 e4 is now not not so good in view v iew of the repy, 16 ... dS. But White

22Aso ex af aNx fter 2 2 . . . Qxf6 23 Qe2

Ng7 2 4 ReS, ReS , White retain retainss the attack. In addition, this continuation cuts across Backbue's pan 64

 

Chess Che ss M Mleg legme me Combina Combinatio tios  s 

of def defence ence,, wi th which whi ch he intended in tended to decisivey refute Zukertort's attack 23  Ne4

witho foundafoundatin,Backburne, pinned anot hiswithout hopesut on this move. Indeed Indeed , what does does White do now? If White retreats the queen, Back Ba ck simpy rrepies epies 24 . . . exfS exfS and, with his powerfuy depoyed knight in the centre and extra pawn, pa wn, stands stands to win. wi n. After 24 Bxe4 dxe4, Back, threatening a rook invasion on c2 with the win of a bishop, obtains a good counterinitiative. It goes without saying that Backburne Backbur ne does not suspect that in this game he is destined to fa victim to one of the most briiant combinations in the history of chess. 24 Bxe4!

A the same! 24



dxe4 25 g6!

At what irst sight is incomprehensibe Whiteit inends after 2S .   Rc2 . Moreo Moreove ver,r, ther theree is nnothi othinng e ese se eft eft for Back, Back , since s ince on 2S 2S . . . hxg6 woud have foowed 26 Rg3 g77 (or 26 . . . Qh7 2 7 Rf g Rf6 Rg7 28 Rh3) 27 dS eS 28 QgS Re8 29 Rf6. 25 Rc2 26 gxh7+ Kh8 27 d5+ e5 

(See diaam next column

If it were not defended by the queen, White woud force mate. Thus,s, on 28 Thu 28    Qxb Qxb44 , foow foowss 29 BxeS+ Kxh7 30 Rh3+ Kg6 31 Rg3 + Kh7 (3  . . . Kh6 3 2 Rf6 + K h S 33 RfS + Kh6 34 Bf4 + and RhS mate) 32 Rf7+ Kh6 33 Bf4+ and Rh7 mate. 28



R8c5

Reativey best, but not not a saving saving repy. re py. On 28 . . . Qe8, decisive decisive isis 29 Rf8+ Qxf8 30 BxeS+ Kxh7 31 Qxe44 + Kh6 3 2 Rh3 Qxe Rh3 + KgS 33 Rg33 +. If, howe Rg howeve ver,r, 28 . . . R2cS , then 29 Qxe4 and Back cannot defend the eS pawn. 29 R+ This new sacrice achieves the capture of the critica eS square. 2 9 Kxh7 O cour course, se, aso afte afterr 29 29 . . . Qxf8 

30 BxeS Bx eS + the the denouemen deno uementt appap proaches quicky. 3 0 Qxe Qxe4 4 + Kg7 3 1 Bxe5 Bxe5 +   32 Bg7 + Back resned.

Zukertort s combination coud

28 Q!!

be characterised as teinitz a true masterpiece of chess art. caed Zukertort's combination combinatio n one of the reate r eatest, st, perhaps perhaps the most beautif beaut ifu u of a a that tha t had ever eve r been bee n created on

In this sur queen sacrifice sacrif ice,, grand in surprising ideaprising and strength, is revealed the whoe of Zukertort's bribri liantt improvisation. The lian Th e combination deveops around the eS point. 6S  

Chesss Mle Ches Mlegame game Comb Combinations  inations 

the chessboard. In 1 889 , out of the the midst of German chesspayers, the 22 year old Emanue Lasker attracted attention. In uy of this year, in an inteationa tournament for amateurs in Bresau (where in the master touament the irst place was aso taken by a German ches ch essp spa aye yerr  . Tarr Tarras asch) ch) , Lask Lasker er turned out to be the winner and gained the right to take part in internationa master tournaments. Aready within a month, Lasker took advantage of this right and competed in a sma internationa tournament in Amsterdam, Amsterdam, where, besides him, him , participated five five Engish, two Dutch and a Viennese master, Bauer. Lasker obtained 2nd prize in in this touamen touamentt (  st wa wass Bu ) . teinitz teinit z wrot wrotee the fo foowing owing assessment of this success: "Herr Lasker made made an exceen exce entt debut in a master touament ... without doubt we wi hear again of the successes of this taented young payer, who, in this touament, created a masterpiece in a concuding attack at tack on the opponent's opponent's king. kin g.  He was referr referring ing to the game Lasker won against Bauer, which was not ony of historica, but aso theoretica significance in the deveopment of combination.

Be7 5 Bd3

The majority of commentators had a negative regard to this move of Lasker, considering that Back coud ater on, with advantage, exchange the bishop, 5 ... b6 6 Nc3 Bb7 7 NO

We quote the text of the game according to teinitz's mgazine, since in severa other pubications (for exampe Dufresne's book  Collect Colle ctio ion n of nst nstc cti tive ve Games, Pla Pl ayed yed in Recen Recentt nte nte atio ationa nall Touamen the move of the

king'stheknight appears as the 6th, and queen's the 7th. 7 ... .. . Nb Nbd7 d7 8 0  0 0  0 9 Ne2 Ne 2 c5

Knowingg the Knowin t he roe which wh ich White's W hite's bi bishop shop on d3 pays i the combination foowing shorty, the commentators unanimousy maintained that Back ought to have exchan exch ange gedd it by paying paying now 9 . . . NcS. Probaby White woud have rep re pied ied 10 Ne NeSS Nxd3 1 1 cxd3 cxd3 . Back is rather cramped, but withthee move th move 1 1 . . . Nd7 Nd 7 he cou coudd pr obaby obtain equa chances. 10 Ng3 Ng 3 Qc7 Qc7 1 1 Ne5 Nxe5 Nxe5 1 2 Bxe5 Qc6 13 Qe2 a6?

Leading to defeat. Back, preoccupied with his pan, ignores White's threat (NhS). It is surprising that not one of the commentators, incuding even teinitz, tein itz, paid atten-

tion to Bauer's mistake. He shoud payy 13 . . . Ne pa Ne4; 4; neithe neitherr 1 4 Qg4 Qg4 nor nor 14 NhS was terribe for Back, in view of 14 ... f6. Back coud aso pay 14 ... g6, but this woud weaken the casted

Bird's Opening

White: Em.Lasker Back: .H.Bauer (Amsterdam 1889)

1 f4 d5 2 e3 Nf6 3 b3 e6 4 Bb2

66  

Chess Mleg Mlegame ame C Combinati ombinations  ons 

position unnecessarily. 4 Nh Nh55 !

14 . . . N Ne8 e8 is no not pos possible sible now, in view f 15 Bxg7. On the other and, the threats Bxf6 or Nxf6, in the present circumstances, are deadly, and so there is nothing left fr Black but to take the knight. 4 ... Nxh5

Black reckone Black reckonedd only only n 1 5 Qxh5 Qx h5 f after which his positin is quite solid.

from the White queen and rooks. Black is forced to accept the sacrifice. On 17 ... f6, the simplest way to to decide the the game is by 8 R R Qe8 19 Qh8+  20 Qh7. 17 . .. Kxg7  Qg4+ Kh Kh77 19 RJ  20 Rh3 Rh3 + Qh6 2  Rxh6 Rxh6 + Kxh6 22 Qd7

The inal thematic move of the combination. The queen carries out a double attack. 22 ... B 23 Qxb7 Kg7

s a result of the combinatn, White has obtained a great material advantage withalready a continuing attack. Black could resign. We give the nal moves.

5 Bxh7+!

24 Rfl Rab 25 Qd7 Rfd 26 Qg4+ K 27 e5 Bg7 2 e6 Rb7 29 Qg6  30 Rxf6+ Bxf6 3 1 Qx Qx + Ke Ke8 8 3322 Qh Qh + Ke7 Ke7 3333 Qg7 + Kxe6 Kxe6 34 Qxb7 Rd6 3 5 Qxa6 Qx a6 d4 336 6 exd4 exd4 cxd cxd4 4 3 7 h4 d3 3 Qxd3 Back signed.

"The beginning f a very deep

lmst 25 years later Lasker's

and elegant elega nt combinatin combinat in , teinitz tei nitz oted, aprpos this sacrifice. Fr this time, Lasker's cmbination was perfectly riginal, since te feature f it cnsists not f the sacrifice of the bishop on h 7, with which we ave already become fmilia mi liarr abve, abve, but in the sacrifice sacrifice,, a move later, f the ther bishp f the g7 pawn.

combinatio combinational idea was repea repeated ted in the game nal Nimzovch Nimzovch Taasch (Petersburg 1914). The latter carried ut a double bisp sacrifice, playing play ing Black in the the fol following lowing pos pos itin.

5 ... Kx  6 Qx Qxh5 h5 + Kg Kg 1 7 Bxg7!

The secnd sacrifice completely wrecks the castled pitin and after this the expsed Black king lls under a cnvincing attack 67  

Chess Mlegme Combina Combinations  tions 

In its aesthe aes thetiticc form form,, Tarrasch's combinatin is even higher than Lasker's. A pure, economical final mate , a sacrifice of of the echange on top f the sacrifice of tw bishops, the uneasy position also of the Black king, all these adorn Tarrasch's play in this game. The venerable German champion was awarded the secnd specia prize for beauty for this game, thugh it was undubtedly as beautiful and eective as the game CapablancaBernstein, which was honoured with the first prize. The

replied repl ied Lask Lasker er  and especial especially ly not not on this matter of what the judges have decided. Your combination with Nimzovich, Doctor, remains a masterrpiece, maste piece , j ust as as all the the brill br illiant iant productions in your games. uch a comb co mbin inati atioon  he added  mi migg ht occur occ ur only only once once in 25 years years . . .  After the game, NimzovichTarrasch, arrasch , the sacrifice of the two bishops occurred in several more games.. And so games so this sort of combinacomb ination assumed a theoretical character, representing, as it were, a theoretical discover dis coveryy of Lasker. The diagonal operation of the bishops in the direction of king'ssidee castlin sid cast ling, g, and the def defenc encee of the g2 and h2 , g7 an andd h 7, pawns pawns with just the king king  this is the combina combina-tinal motive through which one can boldly carry carry out this theoretic theoretical al cmbination. And one more cnclusi clu sin n  the the str strength of two bishops lies nt nly in the har-

judges deny this, decisindid wasnt mtivated bybut the their fact that Tarrasch's cmbinatin was not riginal and had a predecessr. This formal apprach t the prblem was f urse unjust. In cnnectn with this we rrecal ecalll an anecdtal incident incide nt,, of which the authr was an eyewitness. During the banquet at the end of

mony f their thei r peration pto eration, , but also in their readiness "sacrifice themselves. We gie two cmbinational masterpieces, created by Chigorin in the internatinal turnament at New Yrk 1889. In this turnament, Chigorin divided 1st and 2nd prizes with the Austrian grandmaster Weiss and gained a great

8 ... d4 8 exd4 Bxh2+ 20 Kxh2 Kx h2 Q Qh4 h4+ + 2  Kg l Bxg Bxg22 2222 f3 f3

22 g is not possible because of mate after ... Qg4+ and ... Rd5.

22 .. . Rf Rfe8 e8!! 23 Ne4 Qh l + 24 Kf2 Bxfl 2 5 d5 ff55 2 6 Qc3 Qc 3 Qg Qg22 + 2 7 Ke3 Ke3 R Rxe xe4 4 + ! 28 e4 e4 f4 + 2 9 Kxf4 R R+ + 30 Ke5 Qh2 + 3  Ke6 Ke 6R Re8 e8+ + 3 2 Kd7 Bb5 mate. mate.

number f ecellent victries in purely psitional style.

th e turnamen the turnament,t, T arrash arrash came up up t Lasker with a bottl bot tlee f wine wine and and,, withut beating abut the bush, begged to state his opinion abut the decisin f the judges. "I d nt wish to take issue with the judges 

M.Chigorin  W.Poock

The mst mst striking striki ng combinati combinatinal nal motive is the White Wh ite pa pa  n e 7 . 68

 

Chess Mleg Mlegame ame C Combat ombations  ions 

The position posit ion on the board somehow resemble rese mbless a wilderness wilderness Chig Chi g o rin thought thought up a 1 2 move combination His imagination sees the flight of the enemy king through the chessboard wilderness There followed: ol lowed: 34 Rxg Rxg 7 + Kxg7 35 Rb7 + Kg Kg6 6 36 Q +  55 37 3 7 Rb5 Rb5 + Ke4 Ke4

Very diverse combinations might arise on the theme of its reaching the last rank For eample, the move 32 Ng7 might be the start of one of them On 32  Ne7 or 32 e 7, White quickly concludes the struggle strugg le after 33 Qe6 + The best way out for Black would be 33  Re4, but it is obvious that also here the simple e8(Q) + achieves achieves ictry ictry for White Chigrin preferred another, more effective way, striving t cmbine two aspiratins  ict ictr ryy an and beau beauty ty 2 e5 e5  IfNx Nxd6 32d6+ +de5, ! Rx Rxd6 d6 then 34 3 e5 Rd8 + Rf6 Rf6 5 e8( e8(Q Q ) + Kxe8 36 Qd7 + 8 8 7 exf6 Back resigned. .Chigo .Chi gori rin n - .Bir .Bird d

Black also threatens mate! 38 f3 + Ke3 39 Qb3 + Ke2 40 Qb2 + Kd Kd33 4  Qb l + Ke2 42 Rb22 + Ke3 4 Qe Rb Qe l + Kd4 44 Qd2 + Kc4 45 Rb4 mate.

The following game received the first special prze fr beauty in the famous Hastings cngress of 1895 In its cmbinatinal idea, it belongs t the unique productions f chess art The cmbination in this game can be cnsidered the crowning and, t a certain etent, the result f cmbinational creativity of the the secnd half of the 1 9 th century It represents, as it were, the hi highest ghestthught pint f cmbinational thu ghtffascent the 1 9th century, bth in the idea and brilliance f its frm and als in its classical simpli sim plicity city and clarity cla rity f cntent cntent talian Game

White: W.initz Black: C.von Bardeeben Intrnatinal Turnamnt

(Hasti (Ha stings ngs 1895)

 e4 N Nc6 Nc66cxd4 Bc4 Bc5 N f6 5e5d d4 4 exd4 Bb4+ Bb44+ c7 Nc3

The sharpest repl, which was recmmended by teinitz in his 69  

Cess Ml Mleg egme me Com Combin bintion tions  s 

etbook A quieter cntinuatin here is 7 Bd2 Bd2+ 8 Nbd2 White des not sacrifice a pawn but in return return must afte afterr 8    d S  part with h i s pa pawn wn centre centre and sub mitt to the islatin mi islati n f the d4 pawn 7

H

d5

Modern ther ges deepl int the move move 7    N e4 e4  the pra practi ctice ce of which prvides a great deal f material t evaluate frm the variatins ensuing frm ths repl At the th e time the th e requisite requisite cntinua tion was 7    N e4 8 00 Bc3 9 bc3 is the Mller Attack)    dS (9 0d5Ba3 Ba3 whic which h is al als s rec recm m9 mended in teinitzs tetbk  exd5 exd 5 Nxd5 9 0 0

Nw Black has n gd repl A duble capture n c3 leads t de feat as shwn b ther Black cannt withut lss secure cast ling fr himself 9 Be6 Be 6  0 Bg Bg55 Be7 Be7   Bxd Bxd55 Bxd5 2 Nxd5 Qxd5 3 Bxe7 Nxe7 4 Re •••

Whites echanging cmbina tin has nce and fr all deprived Black f the pssibilit f catling Hwever H wever the uncas uncastle tledd king  this is an effective cmbinatinal mt ive and namel n its basis is cns truce Whites future attack 4 ... .. . f6 5 Qe2 Qd7 6 R Rac ac 

B l a c  pla pla    f  f7     N d S a n d    Rhe8 he miht even tae ver the initiative Upn 6    f7 f7  wa wa teinitz recn re cnin in n te cntinuat cntinuatin in  7 Q e7+ Qe7 Qe7  8  e7+ e7 e7  9 Rc7+ et Frm the fllwin ntes the reader will be cnvinced that thi calculatin is t pimistic Hwever after 6 d White initiative wul have cntinued cntinued t develp deve lp f fr eamle 6 dS f7  7 Rad  Rhe8 (if  7    NdS N dS then  8 NgS + f fS S  99Q QQb4  +  Rd Rd ) 18 Qc4 f8 rg82 0Re6 6 ... c6

Blackk d Blac des nt pl  6    f7  prbabl fearin the cmbinatin withh 1 7 Qe7 +  Mean wit Meanwhile while afte  7    Qe 7  8 Re 7 + e7 e 7  Rc7 R c7 + d6 d6 2 0 R R Rac Rac88 2    Rc7 Black succesfull efen himself Admittedl in repl t 16  f7 teinitz ha available the sharpp cnt shar cntinuat inuatin in  7 NeS + (a (al l NgS + ) fe fe 18 de de Q Qee6  9 Rc Rc 7 r 8  e8 19 e6 Qc8 20 Q Blacks defence wuld nt have been eas It is als pssible that this variatin cnfused cnfused Bardeleben Bardeleben Hwever in the numerus surces where this t his game was feat eatured ured nt a

word was said abut this possibilit for White

Perhaps the nl mve in the whole of Whites pla with which we cannot quite agree agree A mre crrect continuation continuat ion of te attack was w as 16 dS One cannot den the tetmove is natural  the the roo rookk is developed on an open line However if

ee e e diag diagra ram m p of net net ge ge

 7 d5!

In order t penetrate with the knight via d4 to e6 The pawn sacrifice is abslutel correct and 70

 

Chess Ml Mlegme egme Combinat Combinations  ions 

Black should not accept it 7 ... .. . ccxd xd55

Better would Better would have have bee beenn 1 7 .......   and and , if 1 8 Nd4, Nd4 , then 1 8 NdS White, however, mai mainta ntains ins the advantage advant age by continuing continu ing 18 dc6 bc6 bc6 1 9 Qc44 + QdS 20 QdS + cdS 2 1 Qc Rc7  8 Nd4 K K   9 Ne Ne6 6 Rhc Rhc8 8 20 4 g6

It is all happening as teinitz anted, and with the following oves he begins to reveal his brilliant combinational plan Added t the particular colouring of the hole combination is the fact that, in the process of carrying it out, hite needs to seriously take into account the lockedin position of is own ingg  a circu in circumst mstanc ancee hich hich is distinctly eploited by Bardeleben 2 Ng5+ Ke8 See diagram p ofnext column

ind themselves under attack Blackk c annot tak Blac take the rook  22    Ke 7  owing ttoo 23 Re 1 + Kd Kd66 24 Qb4+ Kc7 2 S Rc  + or 2S Ne6 + with quick 2 3 Ra+ ! win This move sets o the depth and accuracy of teinitz's technique If White were, first of all, to echange on c8 he could not have won the game 23 ... Kg8 24 Rg7+!!

The peak of beauty  I t is i s clear cl ear that neither with the king, nor the queen, can Black tae the undefended White rook Black has to move to the coer An unusual spectacle!

22 xe7+!! Kf8!

splendid fr theAfact that, reply in thiswhich game,speas teinitz encountered a worthy opponent Because of the threat of mate n c, the Blac queen is invulnerble, whereas all four White pieces

24

•••

Kh8 25 Rxh7+!

Here Bardeleben left te toua 7

 

Chess Ml Mlegame egame Comb Combination inations  s 

ment hall and did not return that day Thus Thus he did not allow teinitz tein itz to bring this remarkable combination to an end. However, teinitz, there and then, demonstrated before the public the finale of his idea, id ea, and and to be preci precise, se, 26    g8 27 Rg7 + h8 28 2 8 Qh4 Qh4 + g7 29 Qh7 + f f8 30 Qh8 Qh8 + e7 3 1 Qg7+ e8 32 Qg8+ Qg8+ ! ( incor incorrect rect would would have been been 32 Re  + d8 33 Ne6 + Qe6, and the ominous threat of mate ma te on c  brings Black Black a win win ) 3 2    e 7 33 Qf Qf7 + d d88 34 Qf8 + Qe8 35 Nf7+ d7 36 Qd6 mate Thus teinitzs calculation (22 Re7+) etended for 14 moves! In our view, the following game, in which clashed the two strongest players of the 890s, should be rank ra nked ed with w ith the number num ber of combicombi national masterpieces of the 19th century

7 ... Be7 Be7 8 0 0 0 Qa5 Qa5  e 3 Bd7 1 0 Kb  h6 1 1 x xd5 d5 exd5 exd5 1 2 Nd4 Nd4 0  0 1 0 Bxf6 Bx 14 Qh5 Nxd4 15 exd4 Be6 16 f4

This precocious attack is beautifully refuted by the world champion Deserving attention is 16 Bc4, and, and, i f 16    gg6, 6, th then en 17 Q Q  Also here Black maintains the initiative by replying 6 Bc4 Qb4 Thee tempt Th te mpting ing  6 Ne4 was was not goo goodd because o the surprising combinational retort 16  Bd4 17 Rd4 Qe 1 + and Black is le left ft wit w ithh an etra pawn 16 ... Ra8 17 f5

Inte nd i ng, on Int on  7    Bd7, t play 8 Q, but Lasker as something else in mind

ueen's ue en's Gambit

.Psbury White Black: Em.Lasker Matchturnament (Petersbur 89/96)

1 d4 d 4 d5 2 4 e6 3 N3 N3 Nf Nf6 6 4 NfJ  5 B xd4 6 Qxd4 N N6 7 Qh4

In a game played between the same partners 9 years later

1 7 ... Rx Rx c3 !

Beautiful, surprising, and at first sight not even fully comprehensible

(Cambridge prings 1904), Pills bury played the sharper 7 Bf6 gf6 and now 8 Qh4 Gradually White succeeded in obtaining an attack To avoid this possib possibili ility ty,, it is usefu usefull for Black on the 6th move to ii rst of all play 6  Be7

18 e6

On 8 bc3 would ave probably followed ollowed 8    Qc3 19 fe6 fe6 Rc8 20 Qf7 + h8 2 1 Be2 Qb4 + 22 a  Rc  + ! and mate in two moves, or 20 ef7 + f8 2 1 e Bd4 72

 

Chess Mdle Mdlegame game Combi Combiation ations  s 

8



Ra3!!

A new reveation by b y Las Lasker ker.. 9 e +  20 bxa3 Qb6+ 2  Bb5

Otherwise i is quite bad, but even ev en now White's White' s position is miserm iserabe. 2



Qxb5+ 22 Kal Rc7

A "quiet move, with the threat .  . R  + , which which deter determin mines es the the correctness of Lasker's fine combination. na tion. Though Though Whit Wh itee parries parries the threat and ater some others, the inevitabe denouement quicky draw dr awss near and it i t iiss crowned wi th a spendid diagona mate with the bishop. On the way to this mate, hi hite te ove overooks rooks the sacrifice sac rifice of the second rook on the same ifated a3 square. 23 Rd2 Rc4 24 Rhdl  24 Qe2 Lasker had had in m ind a

beautifu sacriice of the queen: 24 . . . Rx Rxdd4 25 Qxb5 (25 Qe6 Qe6 + Kf Kf8 26 c88 + Kf7 c Kf7 27 Qc7 Q c7 + Kg6) 25 R 26 Rb2 or 26 Bxbb42++! and then Rxb5 . . . Rxb5. Rxb5. 24 ... Rc3

o as, on 25 Rb, to repy 25 ... c4 an and, if 26 Qd Qd  , then then 26 . . . Bg5 Bg5 27 Re2 Re2 Rd3 Rd3 or 2 7 . . . Be3 . Never Never-theess this quiet, sefcondent move mo ve might give Whi W hite te a surprising surpri sing chan ch ance. ce. A decisive decisi ve continuation continua tion of of

simpy . . . Qxa3 simpy Qxa3 , maintan maintann ngg a strong attack, whereas the positions of White's pieces are highy passive. 25 Q5

N o ess unpeasant fo for Back here was the move move 25 Re , with the threat to exchange queens. On 25 . . . Qc4, Qc4 , White force orcess a dra draw: w: 2 6 Re8+ Kh7 27 Qf5+ g6 28 Re7+ B g 7 (2 8 . . . B x e7 2 9 f7+ Kh 8 30 Q e8+ and Qxe7+ Qx e7+ ) 29 Rxg7+ Rxg7+ etc. etc. 2 5 . . . Kf8 i s as asoo dou doubt btffu i n view of 26 R with wi th the irresistib irresistibee threat of a sacrifice on f6. Back woud have to retreat the rook to c8, but then, if ony, 26 Qf5 Qc4 27 Qd3. The move made by Pisbury Pisbury does not contain direct threats and this is its minus. 25

 

Qc4 26 Kb2?

This is aready careessness. 26 Qf1 was aso not good, in view of thee simpe 26 th 26 . . . Qa4, and and White's position remains diicut, but 26 Kb wasthreatens necessary. After this, White to provoke an exchange by Rc2. If, however, 26 . . . Rx Rxa3 a3 , then then 27 R  ! and no nott possibe are ... Qb5+ or Qb4+ because of 28 Rb2, and it is Back not White who stands bady. Covering himsef with the rook is aso miserabe: miser abe: 27 . . . Rc3 28 Rxc3 Rxc3 Qxc3

29 Qxd5+ and White has everythin more or ess in order. A draw might be obtained after 26 . . . Qb5 + 2 7 Rb Rb2 c c66 28 28 Rc2 Rc2 Qb5 + etc. etc . Back's king is aso insuicienty covered, and there is hardy anything better for him.

the attack attack was 24 24 . . . Qc5 ! and and if 25 e8+ Kh7 26 Qe3 (there is apparenty nothing ese), then 26 ... Rc3 ! 2 7 Rd3 ( 2 7 dxc dxc55 R mate) mate) 27 . . . Bxd4! Bxd4! 28 Qxd4 Qxd4 R R  + and and 29 b22 Qc2 mate. Upon the re b repy py 2 7 e in this variation, Back pays 73  

Chess d dlega legame me Combaon Combaons  s 

Lasker's reply strikes like a bolt from the blue.

26 ... Rxa3! 27 Qe6+ Kh7 On 28 Qf5 + Black replies now

28 ... h8.

28 Kxa3 Qc3 + 29 Ka4 bS + 3 0

KxbS Qc4+

And mate on the following move. With this brilliant eample, we conclude our sho short rt history illustratil lustrating the development of combinational ideas in the second half of the 19th century. The main conclusion from the given eamples is this: in the second second half of the 1 9th century, combinations gradually came forth as an organic component part of the positional plan, and began to show the way for a construction of its theory and subsequent sequ ent historical his torical stages of i ts devedeve lopment.

74  

Chapter Chapt er Eigh Eightt

Double Attack. ttack. Pawn Attack acks.  s.  The double attack is the most frequently met case of simultaneous attack. It is necessary to subject this theme to an independent, separate investigation. The theme of double attack (mainly ith the knight) has already been

the queen does subject the Black pawn on g7 and d7 to attack. The object of the blow always becomes undefended or insuiciently defended points in the deployment of enemy forces, and frequent motives in combinations with the the-

slightly upontheincombinaChapter 2, wheretouched we showed tional elements. There, however, e touched upon this theme only ith the aim a im of more clearly fami fami-liarisingg the liarisin th e reader reader with w ith the th e de deini ini-tion itself of the theme, i.e. how e understand this as an element of combination. Now before us stan stands ds another anoth er task  to investigate the theme of double attack in all he aspects aspects f it which wh ich could cou ld have a bearing on its implementation in he practice practice of combinationa combin ationall creativity. Above all, one important matter should be mentioned. ouble attack is not only a combinational nation al theme. It can be delivered del ivered also ithout combinations. This is the first thing. However, the se-

me of and double attack are weak points pieces (or pawns). The most eective piece for delivering a double attack, clearly, is the queen. Let us try to porray schematically the various themes of double attack with the queen. From Fro m th e diag di agram ramss given below we see that there are five such kinds. The queen alone, at times, times , del ivers a double attack, but more often i requires the help of some piece or other, as we can see se e both both fr from the given schemes and also from he eamples illustrating the delivery of a double attack in the chess game.

cond thing is that we do not call any one attack a ltblow, only which whicinh is ichess s diicu diicult to parry. parbut ry. For eample, one cannot rgard as a blow the move 3 Bb5 in the panish Game or the doubleblow move 2 Qg4? after 1 e4 e5, though 75  

Chess Che ss Mlega Mlegame me Com Combi biatio ations  ns 

Three kinds of double attack with the queen, more than any other,

are met in games. These are: 1) double attack along the diagonal 2) double attack along the rank and fle, and 3) double attack along along the diagonal and rank (or ile) 76  

Chesss Mdl Ches Mdlegam egamee Comb Comban ans  s 

hite: .R.Capabana Black: 

Rad 1 , Black, as a minimum, minimum , loses loses the pawn on e5 with the worse position. Bu chooses the second way but, bu t, upon it, a combination on the theme of double attack awaits him.

(San Sebastia Sebastian n 19 1 1 

17

Let us take a look at combinations with these themes. Spanish Game

•••

b4 18 xb4 Bxb4

  e5 2 N Nff3 N6 3 Bb5 a6 4 a4 Nf6 5 d3 d6 6 c3 Be7 7 Nbd2 Nb d2 0  0 8 Nf b5 9 B2 d5 1 0 Qe2 dx dxe4 e4   d de4 e4 B5

Black's last two moves are poor and allow White to plan an interesting combination. 12 InBg5 the present situation, the pin

of the Black king's knight is a serious rio us combinational combinational motive. motive . 12 Qe7

•••

Be6 Be 6 13 Ne Ne33 Re Re8 8 1 4 0 0

14 . . . Bxe3 Bxe3 isis bad, bad, in view view of 1 5 fxe3 ! but he should retu with the bishop bish op to e 7 . 15 Nd5 Nd5 ! B Bxd xd55 1 6 ex exd5 d5 N N  17 a4!

Here White could carry out ofa little combination on the theme doub ouble le attack: attack: 1 7 d6 d6 Bxd6 Bxd6 1 8 Bxf Bxf66 Qxf6 1 9 Qe Qe4 Nd 7 20 Qxh Qxh 7 + . hite somewhat worsens the position of the Black Bl ack king. king . Capablanca Capablanca finds a combination on the same theme, but with a better result. The move in the game is, as it

19 Bxf6 Qx 20 Qe4

A double attack on h7 and b4. The possibility of it is conditioned by the undefended state of the bishop on b4 and the fact that the h7 square is defended only by the king. If the Black Blac k pawn pawn were on a5 a5 or thecould knighthave not been on b8, b8no , but on f8 , there question of a double attack. 20

•••

Bd6

Or 20 . . . Qg Qg66 2 1 Qxb4 Qxb4 Qxc xc22 22 Rac 1 a n d Black Black loses loses the the c7 pawn. pawn. 2 1 Qxh7 + K 2222 Nh4 Qh6 Qh6

If 2 2 . . . g6, then then 23 23 Bxg6! Bxg6! 23 Qxh6 gxh6 24 Nf5 and White

were, an introduction to th were, this is combination. White threatens simply to take the pawn on b5. There is nothing to defend it, and Black is faced with the alternative of playi n g 1 7 . . . bxa bxa 4 o r 1 7 . . . b4. I n t h e first case, after 18 Bxa4 Rd8 19

wins.

White carried out a whole series of combinations on the theme of double attack in the exhibition game Capabana Capabana us Cho miky (Petersburg 913). 77

 

Chess Mle Mlegame game C Combinat ombinatins  ins 

It seems that now everything is in Black's hands and so it also would be if the character of the struggle were determined only by its positional elements. Hwever combinations intervene and everything is changed as if by magic. 25 e5! g6

The diagram poston is after Black Bla ck's's mo move 2 2 . . . N c5 . The The game game continued 23 b4!!

first first sight sig ht rather harmless harm andThis nota t very intelligible moveless is the prelude to a series of elegant and surprising combinatins. t is incomprehensible for what reason White invites the opponent's knight to a4 where it secures the capture of a weak point in White's camp ca mp  the the c3 squa square re and pro pro-bably domination over one f the open les. 000

2 3Black Na4 does not unravel the oppo-

nent's combinational idea but he hardly need grieve heavily over this. The The continua continuation tion 23 . . . Nxd3 24 Rxa8 Rxa8 25 Qxd3 would lead to a winning position for White due to the weakness of Black's pawns. White threatens after 26

f Black Black were were ttoo rep reply ly 25 . . . dxe5  then with wit h the the move move 2 1 Qf Qf55  White Wh ite  by attac att acki king ng the the h 7 and c8 points  also in this way carries out points the theme of double attack and would complete attack. triumphantly However also after the defensive move Black's position remains dismal since White's attack does not dry up and after a twomove combination once again begins to regenerate its "electric charge. ts summer lightning begins to flash from all directions. 26 e6 R

f 26 . . . fxe6 then 2 7 Qg Qg4 27 Ng3 Qb7

On 2 7 . . . fxe6 ffollows ollows 28 Qg4 Qg4 ee55 29 Bxg6.

28 Nf5!

Also this is an original double attack. Both Nh6+ and exf7+ are threatened. Clearly impossible is 28 . . . gxf5 29 Qx Qxf5 and and mate mate is unavoidable.

Rc6  to win Rc6 wi n one f the pawns b5 or d4. f however however 25 . . . Bf6 Bf6  then then all al l the the same  26 Rc6 Rc6 Qb8 Qb8 2 7 f4 ! and Black is helpless against the maneuvre Nfg3f5 or h5 since on ... g6 follows e5.

28

000

e6 e 6 29 2 9 dxe6 dxe6

A new cmbination on the theme of double attack with the knight. knig ht. 29 . . . Qx Qx  wul wuldd lose lose a piece after  N xe 7 + . 29

000

Qc7

Or 2299 . . . Qa7  N h 6 +  g 7 3 

24 Rxc8+ Rxc8

78  

Chess Che ss M le lega game me Co Comb mbina inati tions  ons 

N with the threats of 32 BxbS andd Qh6+ an Qh6+ .

3 0 Qc6

One of more combination on the theme doube attack with knight: 30 30 . . . Qxc6 3 1 N xe7 + . 30

•••

Qd8

Giving up materia and the game. 31 Nxe7+

Possiby the objective was achi ac hiev eved ed ev even en quick quicker er by 3 1 N h6+ g77 3 2 Nf g N f7 , but not i n the the stye stye of of Capabanca, Cap abanca, to whom whom "a bir bi rd in i n the hand bush. is worth twice in the 3 1 Qx Qxe7 e7 3 2 Bxb5 Nc3 3 3 Qd7 Qxd7 34 Bxd7 •••

Back now oses the exchange, but, through inertia, he sti continued the strugge for some time. Can i t be said that tha t the combinacombina-

said that Capablanca's positional plan was met, right from the opening, by an insiciently staunch resistance, which aso faciitated the successful conduct of its concuding combinationa stage for Capalanca. V myslov spoke well apropos aprop os the th e inevitabl i nevitablee course of the struggle when when there is an accum accumua ua-tion of combinationa tension, in his book "elected Games. He wrote wro te "A correctl correctlyy staged staged game not infr in frequently equently creates creates,, in its development a culminating moment which can ony be decided by combinational means. But nevertheess nevertheess in the creative process there is i s aso a place ffoor the chance combination combination,, when one of the opponents overooks a combination nat ion prepared prepared befo beforehand rehand which whi ch in such cases begins to assume the character of a skifuy disguised trap, but is not a ogica consequence of panned positional pay. We want to ook in more at one such case, where aso detai the theme of doube attack with the queen is featured. In the game Dubinin aviky (9th UR Championship, Leningrad 1934), the foowing position arose after White's White's move 20 R   .

tion carried out by Capabanca in this game bore a fortuitious character ract er and was the resut resu t of a serious seriou s mistake,, made by his opponent? mistake opponent ? Of Of course not! This combination appeared as an organic part in the pan, and, as it were, was the stage of competion competio n of the pan. It can be

(ee diram next page)

Back has the more active position. The powerfu depoyment of hiss queen hi queen and and rook, rook, the th e pi pinn on on c4, passed apawn, weakness of the eS pawn, contro contro of the th e cent centra ra die  these many positiona considerations convince us that Back has 79 

 

Chesss Mdleg Ches Mdlegame ame Com Combat batons  ons 

2 Rxa5 Rdl + 22 Rfl Rd2

the initiative in the deveoping struggle. avitsky made the "beautiful move 20 ... a5? This bad move surprisingly brings Black a

23 R??

Black also counted on this. thi s. Now

quick to victory, whereas inl neutrafact it ought have hav e led to a total tota lisation of Black's positional advantage. Black gives up a pawn, obtaining nothing in retu. It tus ou t that avi a vitsky tsky played fo for a trap in the hope that his partner would not notice the combination he had prepared. And so it happened. Playing for a "trap  this is a bad style of play, which usually

follows combination the theme of adouble attackonwith the queen. 23 ... Rxf2 24 Kxf2 Rxc4! and White resigned in view of 25 Qxc44 Qd2 + xa5 . Instea Qxc Insteadd o f the fatal 23rd move, White should conti co ntinu nuee 23 g3 , and and nei either ther 23 . . . Qh6, nor nor . . . Rcd8 Rcd8 gives gives Black Black a decisive attack. More than this Black must reckon with the threat

turns against author himself hi mselfsharply of the trap. Play,thecounting on a mistake by the opponent, usually usua lly consists of bad moves and is j ustified ustified sportingly only in i n that case when the opponent falls into a "trap. Creatively, however, in general it is not justified, since the

of mate, arises for for White Whi te,with , on themate back, which rank in connection the lockedin position of the Black king.. Here is an approxima king approximate te variation, pointed by by G. G . Y. Levenf Levenfisish: h: 2 3 gg33 Qh6 Qh6 24 h4 Rcd8 Rcd8 25 Rb  ! Qg6? 26 Qxd2 Rxd2 2 7 Ra8 + and mate in two moves.

bad moves of the winner do not become good just because the opponent "blunders. Winning a bad game  resounds resounds as a paradox paradox,, and and in every case the bad play remains remain s a discredit to creativity. However, what wh at happene happenedd in i n the game? This is what happened:

Instead of the trappy idea with 20 . . . a , avitsky should should advan advance ce the other rook's rook's pawn two squares, which would give him good chances ch ances of win winning ning the game. And so 20 ... h5. The a7 pawn is safe, becaus bec ausee of the the combination combination 2 1 Rxa77 Rxc 4, then Rxa then . . . Rd  + an andd . . . 80

 

Chess Mdleg Mdlegame ame Comba Combatns  tns 

e3 + (diagona doube attack withh the wit the queen) queen) . At the same same time, hite is bound hand and ft, whie his bishop remains pinned: te pin serves as a highy active combinationa motive. The bishop can only be unpinned un pinned by the move 2 Qb3 (on 21 Qc foows an elegant combination: 21 xc + 2 2 Rxc Rxc Rxc4! Rxc4! 2 3 Rx Rxc4  + 24 Rf Rxf + 25 Kxf Kxf Ba6 Ba6  theeme  doube attack th attac k ooff the the bbishop ishop alongg the diagona alon diagona)) 2 1 Qx Qxe5 e5 22  

Rxa7 Qc5 23 Rxb7 Rd2 24 Qb6 Qxc4! Qc, land + 26 Kf Kf22 Qxd2 + 25 2 7 Rxd2 Kg Kg] g5 White,

obviousy, cannot repulse the mating attack. The variations are fu of interesting ideas and combinations. A this coud have happened upo uponn 20 2 0 . . . hS . After 20 . . . a victory came more quicky, but creativey the game was impoverished. White gained an exceent victory, in on the thefoowing theme ofgame. doube attack, Queen' Que en'ss Gambit

hite: A.Rubinsin Back: E.Znosko E.ZnoskoBorovsky Inteational Conress (Petersbur 909)

flank. lan k. One of the concrete minuses min uses of Back's ast move, amongst others, is that, after 8 cxdS, he cannot take on dS with the knight in view of the oss of a pawn. However, in the event of 8 cxdS exdS, the position of the Back b ishop on b 7, wher wheree it wi obv iousy be deveoped, is rather passive. It is interesting that, in this game, the bishop on b 7, being undefended, even pays a roe of a combinationa motive. Back's most energetic repy to 7 Qc2 is consid con sidere eredd to to be bpayed e her heree in. . this cS .variaThis was frequenty frequenty t. his tion, and with good success, by Teichmann. 8 cxd cxd55 ! exd5 exd5 9 BdJ BdJ Bb7  0 000

This sharp variation, introduced into practice by Rubinstein and in which White prepares the storm h4 and g4, creates great combinationa tension in the strugge. 10



N e 4 I I h 4 f5 I I Kb Kb l !

subte having the aim noA not t ony on y of removing remove, moving the t he ki king ng fro from m a ine on which Back coud countera te ratt ttac ackk by . . . cS aand nd . . . Ra Racc8 , but aso preparing a convenient situation for a combination. 12

 

c5?

Aready Back's ast move gave

rise to doubt; the opening of the a2g8 diagona, with the king on g8, wi create new combinationa motive mot ivess  which which as aso rathe ratherr sugsuggested to Rubinstein the move 12 Kb 1 . The concrete signific significance ance of this move is seen from the foowing note.

I d4 d5 2 cc4 4 e6 3 Nc3 N 4 Bg5 Be7 5 e3 N N77 6 N N 0  0 7 Qc2 

At the time this game was payed, the theory of the Orthodox ariation st stii did not highigh high ightt suf suf-cienty the shady side of this method of deveoping the queen's 81  

Chesss Mleg Ches Mlegame ame Comb Combation ation

13 dxc5 bxc5

Not 1 3 . . . Ndxc5 Ndxc5 , in view of 1 4 N xd5 Bxd5 Bxd5 1 5 Bc4. I f the the White White ki kinng we were standing standing on c  , then this combination combinat ion would prove to be imim practicable pra cticable in view v iew of the intermediat di atee 14 . . . N xd3  with with ch chec eck, k, bbut ut als also, in repl replyy to 1 3 . . . bxc5 , RubinRubinstein ste in had prepared prepared a beautiful combination in which was consistently consistently carried out the theme of double attack, at first by the bishop, then the queen, and finally the rook. Inst In stea eadd of 1 2 . . . cS , Black Black coul couldd make the the also pre prepa para rattthis or oryy mov mcase ove, e, White 12 ... R, but in maintains the initiative by continuing 13 Bxe4 fxe4 14 Ne5 Ne 5 , and, if 14 . . . Nxe5, then then 15 ddxe xe55 Bxg5 Bx g5 1 6 hxg5 Qxg5 17 f4! Andd so Black overlooks An overloo ks the combination and finds himself already under the "yoke of strong pressure from the opponent's side. uch a phenome phe nomenon non  an oversight oversight in the the worse position, is highly characteristic for the thinking of some and even many many chessplayers, chessplayers , coming up agains aga instt  diiculties. diiculties. Here Here , several several traits of a man's nature are tried, such as coolness, stubborness and will. The idea of Rubinstein's combicomb i-

15 Bxe4!

A double attack att ack by th thee bishop b ishop on d5 and h7. 1 5 .. . dx dxee4

Thusattack opening both ways for a double by Rubinstein. 16 Qb3+

A double attack of the queen. 16 ... Kh8 17 Qxb7 ex 18 Rxd7

A double attack of the rook on d and e7. 18 ... Qe8 19 Rxe7 Qg6+ 20 K a  Rab8 Rab8 2 1 Qe4 Qe4 Q Qxe xe4 4 22 Rxe4 Rxe4 g2 23 Rg Rxf2

As a result of the deeplycalculated combination, combination, White has an extra piece. Black's little counterplay, in connection with the penetration of his pawn to g2, is liquidated quickly by simple technical means. To give the full picture we present the finale.

nation consists consists of the exploitation of the dile and the a2 g diagonal di agonal for the setting up of a series of double attacks. By sacrificing a bi bishop, shop, White Wh ite opens opens both these arteries for his combintional attacks.

24 Rf4 Rc2

If 24 ... Rbxb2, then 25 Rf+ 25 b3 h6 26 Be7 Re 27 Kbl Re2 28 Bxc5 Rd8 29 Bd4 Rc8 30 Rg4 Back resigned.

Th theme of of "double attack atta ck , in its structure, looks very simple, and, it would seem that contem

14 Nxe4! e4

2  

Chess Mleg Mlegme me Combin Combinations  ations 

porary chessplayers of our epoch, aving many exampl exa mples es from from pla pl a y of tee classic past, t past , could by now make make some theoretical generalisations and conclusions. However, creatively, this theme is so interesting and rich and contains such s uch a varied var ied combinational process, that even famous grandmasters of our time ll victim to combinations on this teme. Here is ne of these.

wrecked. tahlberg's attentin was drawn t yet anter cmbinatinal mtive the undefended state of the rok on a6 tgether with the weakness f the g6 pint. Cncentratig is creative thugts arud these mtives tahlberg finally fud a cmbinatin wic quickly achieved victry fr him. The intrductry move mo ve t the cmbinatin is beautibeaut iful. 3  B ! !

Blackk cann Blac cannt t take take the rk: rk: 3  . . . Rx Rxd2 32 Qxg6+ Qxd6 g6+ 35f8Qe6 33 Qg Q g8 + e7 34d2Qe8+ mate. 3   Kx Kx 32 Rxd8 Rxd8 Qxd8 Qxd8 33 Qb7+

Te theme. 33  Kg8 34 Qxa6 e4 35 Re3 Bd4 36 Rxe4 Back resigned

The diagram features the position after the 30th move in the game tahbe tahbeNa Najd jdorf orf played i 1947 at the international turament in Buenos Aires. Blacks position is clearly wrse due to the splendid deployment of te hite bishop in the centre of te board. Under cover f this bishop, hite could systematically, and in various ways, con-

n the game mysov mysovEuwe (nternatinal Candidates Turnament in witzerland 1953), hite carried ut an f elegant cmbinatin on the teme double attack.

duct his attack. For example, 31 dd3 with the threat of Rxf6 is worth considering; very dangeous for Black was the idea of attack with h4h5, against which there is apparently no good defence, for example, 31 h4  32 g4 and the Black kings pawn cover is

The diagram is after hites 24th move. There followed:

24 Bb4! Q6

83  

Chess Mdleg Mdlegame ame Combinat Combinatns  ns 

but after still a long struggle. Bronstein gave the following

liantly portrays the nature of this that it is hardly worth adding adding anything to such a picture. We pick out briefly our thoughts, thoug hts, devoted to the theme of double attack (mainly with the queen). In the majority of cases, a weakened point in i n the castled castled position serves as one of the objects of attack, when carrying out the theme of double attack. Let us list other combinational methods which assist in the carry-

vaaton, myslov's which would have crowned combination more worthi worthily: ly: 29 Bg2 Re8 30 Bxe5 Rxe5 31 Qxe5 Qxe5 32 Bxc6+ Kb 33 Rb7+ Ka8 34 Rb6 (b5, b4, b3) mate. It would have been possible to give further quite a lot of illustrations demonstrating the double attack with wi th the queen. It is useful for the reader himself to sort out and investigate suitable examples. pecial examples of double attack by the rook rook or bishop are not not given given.. These are identical with the double attack of the queen. Double attack with the rook is the same as the verticalhorizontal blow with the queen. The theme of the bishop is

ing of combinational ideas on this out theme: 1 ) The The meth method od of enti enticeme cement nt (pi eces lured to an undefended square, thee king  to a line th lin e where it can can be be checked) 2 ) The rever reverse se of th thee first first  the method of diversion (pieces diverted from defence of squares or lines intended intended as one of the th e ob objects jects of the double attack) 3) Demolition or removal of ostacles (doing away with enemy pieces and pawns with the aim of exposing the position of the king, opening of lines, weakening of squares). There are also other combinational methods, as, for example,

To avoid the double attack, 24 . . . Qxb Qxb 4 2 5 Qxe Qx e 5 +. 25 Bc3

Again threatening the thematic bows Bxe5 or Qxe5. 25

00 0

Bg7 26 Nc5

And once again a double attack is prepared, this time with the knight. 26 Ka8 27 Nxb7 Kxb7 28 Rd7+ Ka8 29 Qc5 and hite 000

won

th e method ooff intercption intercption of lines of defence (depriving the attacked oint of defence by intercepting the line of operation of the piece defending it, for example the move e5 in the "Immortal "Immortal game) game) . A parparticula tic ularr place place is occupied occupied by the method of the pin of a piece, and

the theme of the diagonal double attack with the queen. Likewise we do not consider it necessary to return once again to the double attack of the knight. The nature of such a double attack is clear. Just the one study of Troi Troitsky, tsky, given giv en in in Chapter 3, so diversely and bril 84  

Chess Ml Mlegam egamee Comba Combans  ns 

veral others. We refer to these later on. Now however we want to throw light on the question of the combinational role of the weakest ches hess unit  the pawn its part in those combinations where it is destined to play the role of a hero. owever o wever also the t he secondary secondary role of the pawn has a part whic wh ichh is i s of very great signiicance. A very complicate ca tedd combination combi nation mi ght not no t receive its fullment if a pawn taking part at some stage of of i t  turns out to  justthat one on square further forwardit than which precisely

would play its secondary role. Below we are oered the possibility of convincing ourselves that the pawn might indeed become a hero he ro ooff a combination combinat ion which whi ch presents itself as as the bbasic asic reason for for its bi birth. rth. In other words words we must recognise that the activisation of pawns leads to the creation of original combinational motives. A passed passed far advanc advanced ed pawn  is almost on the threshold of a combico mbination. In chess terminology the double attack of the pawn is given the gra graphi phicc name of the "fork. "fork. Already in the opening stage we often come across the pawn fork. In

Four Knights Game

White: Danowski Black: EmLasker nteational Tournament (Cambride Sprins 904)

1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nf3 N6 3 Nc3 N£ N£6 4 B5 B5

The famous famous Morphy Mo rphy also l iked to play this. 5 Nxe5

Already here there is a lttle combination on the theme of the pin. 5  Nxe5

goes halfway to meeting theLasker opponent and allows him to carry out the theme of the fork. In the wellknown game L.PaulsenMorphy Black castled which looks more natural. Contemporary openingg analysis also look openin lookss aatt 5 . . . Nd4 here. 6 d4

White wins back the piece at the same time having the rather better development.

the middlegame  the the th e pawn fork fork apap pea ears rs at the th e other ot her times t imes as a combi national The exploitation theme. of the "fork both as a tactical method and as a combinational theme is well portraye tra yedd in the first half of the fol ollow low-ing game.

6  Bd6 7 £4 Ng6

The best opening reference book bo okss ccon onsi side derr 7 . . . Nc6. 8 e5

85  

Chesss Mle Ches Mlegame game Combi Combinations  nations 

Yet another fork. Admittedly, in the present situation it does not present itself as a combinational theme. 8    cc6 6

A dubious attempt to confuse the game. Janowski considered it obligatory to castle here, but also possible sible is 8 . . . Be 7. 9 Bc4

Black's position becomes critical Black's afte af terr 9 exd6 cxb5 10 Qe2 + f8 1 1 f5 N h4 h4 1 2 0  0 b6 1 3 Bg 5 , or or 1 2 . . . Q b6 1 3 Qe7+ Qe7+ g8 1 4 Nd Nd5. 5. 912Bxd5! Bc7 1 0 eex x Qx6 1  0  0 d5 d5

Otherwise Black simply obtains the better game. 12  cxd5 13 Nxd5 Qd6 4 Qe22 + Ne7 1 5 R Qe Ree I Bd8 1 6 c4 £6 17 Bd2 a 18 Qh5+ g6 19 cS Qa6 20 Qh Qh6 6 Be6

24 Qb3 + e7 25 Re  + f8 26 26 Nxa8 Qxa8 27 Qe6 Qe6 ! g7 ! 28 Q Qd7 d7 + h6. Janowski indicated 21 Qg7 as a winning move, considering that after 2 1 . . . Bxd5 Bxd5 22 Qxh8+ Qxh8+ d7 23 Qxh 7, Whi White te has both a material mat erial advantag adva ntagee  rook and and three three pawn pawnss for bishop and knight, and also a continuing attack. This evaluation requires careful verifcation, since it does not take into account the powerful attacking position of Black's centralised whitesquared bishop. bisho p. By continuin continuingg 23 . . . Qc6 Black Bla immedia i mmediately tely obtains chances of ackcounterattack. n this example, the combina tiona role of of the paw pawnn  the openopening thematic thematic fork fork  was still sti ll comparatively unimportant. However, recalling the historical game from the 4th match between the strongest masters of their thei r tme t me,, Labour Labour donnais (France) and MacDon  ne (England), where three pawns of Labourdonnais, playing Black, reached the second rank, automatically imbues one with great faith in the dynamic combinational activity of pawns. Here is the concluding combination in this game.

2 1 Nx  + ?

This continuation loses the game. Black holds holds on to the piece , and also obtains a counterattack. After 21 ... f7 22 Ne4 Nf5! Chigorin gave the following variation, leading to victory: 21 Nb6 N f5 ! 2 2 Rxe6 Rx e6 + f7 23 Qh3 Qh3 xe6 xe 6 86  

Chss Ch ss M Mlega legame me Combn Combnati ations  ons 

There followed:

6 ... Qxdl!

This Th is is m moore decisi decisive ve then then 3 6 . . .

the material and and positional positi onal advantage turned out to be the decisive advance of the White g5 pawn,

+

xf 7 Rx Rxf f39 e 2.g3,ByWhite playing playingcould now now 38 Qd33 e(Q) ave still put up resistance. 7 Rxdl e2

The three pawns tu out to be stronger, by far, than the queen and rook, and White cannot avoid a quick mate. The impetuous march of pawns to queen queen in i n many games figures as a teme of beautiful combinations.

which, taking supporting bishopinto , embodies embaccount odies all the elements eleme nts of of combinati combination on  motive, idea, theme. The possibility of a harmonious attack on the  point with the bishop and pawn is the basic leit mot of the combination. And so: 27 g6! Re7 28 Qh5 Nh6

et us look at a number of examples.

29 Qxh6!

n the diagram is the pton after the 26th move in the game terk te rkMarshaU (nteational touament in Pistyan 1912). hite is the exchange ahead; Black has no compensation for it,

A sacrifice with two thematic mates in mind. One theme mates theme  mate wi th a rook supported by the bishop andd . . . fo an forr the the pres present, ent, a nonnonexistent knight knight!! 29 ... gxh6 30 gx+ Kh7 3 (N)+

 t wa wass possible to delay the the decideci -

ore than this, the positional advant va ntag agee is l ikewise on White's White 's side. sid e. is bishop on c4 occupies a threatening place, while the , g7 and  7 points are really weak. we ak. Partic Particuularl larlyy weak is the  point, poin t, which is already subjected to attack. Thee most energetic real isati Th isation on of

si sion on by one move, by promoting promoting to a queen, but it seems that White was not conceed only concise that but the elegant. decision 3  ... Kh8 22 Rg8 mate.

Though the final mating theme passed by, as it were, without the firsthand participation of the 87

 

Chess Che ss Md Mdleg legame ame Com Comba bation tions  s 

pawn, it would be ingracious of Black Bla ck to forget about i ts heroic run. From the idea side, but not the technical, the piece on f8 is not simpy a knight, but a pawn transformed into a knight. In the following position we see how the firmly blockaded dS pawn is surprisingly given the "green light and quickly brings the desired decision for White. (From the game, BotvinnikGrigoriev, Grigoriev, LeningradMoscow match 1927)

30 Qxd2 31 Qx Qx  + Ng8 32 c8(Q) c8( Q) Back resigned. 

In the game, c chechr hechr Peris Peris (International touament in Carl Ca rlsb sbad ad 1 9 1 1 ) , stil stilll in in the the open open-ing, even in the early stage of it, White succeeded in demonstrating a fascinating idea, the essence of whic wh ichh is to free free the pawn for for queen qu een-ing by a surprising combination. After the moves: 1 d4 d5 2 Nf3 Bf5 3 c4 c6 4 Qb3 Qb6 5 cxd5 Qxb3 6 axb3

Black felt he was forced to play 6



Bxbl

The introductory move of the combination is surprising and beaubeautiful. 28 Rxe5

Black now has a painful choice  whether to leave the rook to its own fate, by playing 2 8 . . . QxeS , or to go halfway to meeting White's

Indeed, the continuation 6 cxdS 7 Nc3 e6 8 NbS Na6 9 Rxa6 bxa6 bx a6 10 Nc7 + d8 d8 1 1 Nxa8 c8 c8 1 2 Bf Bf44 might not not suit him, but nnow ow

combiational theme and open the combiational semaphore "pawn on dS. Black chooses the second.

follows a witty combination, in which the pawn must show all its best qualities.

28

7 dxc6!!

 

dxe5 29 d6

And here also is the known to us them th emee  doubl doublee attac attack. k. 29



With rare originality and a beautiful tif ul idea. id ea. On 7 Be4 would have followed 8 Rxa7! Rxa7! ! R Rxa7 xa7 9 c7. This position, which we give in the diagram, also appears as the theme  

Qd8 30 dxc7

It was possible to conclude also with 30 Qxf8+ Qxf8 31 dxc7. 88  

Chess Ch ess M le lega game meCo Combi mbia aio ions  ns 

of chechter's combination.

exampes, was carried out in the game, BogoyubovAekhe from the inernational tournament at Hastings 1922. The shows the position after diagram hite's 29th move Rxa5.

The pawn on c7 embodies in its action, as it were, a doube attack in which the threat b8 also represents a bowtointake the on nest sense of the word. Referring to the treat c8, even this is also not a low low in the the i tera sense, sense, but bu t neverteless it is a threat of mate or a blow on a square. Therefore, in ches ch esss terminology , th thee th thrreat ea t to advanc va ncee the pawn to the ast rank it i t is customary to consider a blow. Thus in pawn themes there are two aspects of double attack: one  is a fork, the the other  the the threat to capture, at the same time as the treat to advance the pawn to the last square of its ie. e have digressed from the chechterPerlis game, but there

There folowed: 29 ... b4!

The beginning The begin ning of a deeply calc ca lcuulated combination the theme of which is the same as tat in the game chlechterPerlis. The basis f it is the undefended state of te first rank and the undefended knight on d wich is situated on it. 30 Rxa8

hi te is hoping hite hoping for 30 . . . Qxa Qxa88 , which would leave him chances of resistance. Bad now would be 30 Qa 1 , on which woul wouldd have fol-

remain rema inss to give j ust on one move move 7 . . . Nxc66 8 Rxb  . Back is si mply ef Nxc eftt a pawn down with the worse posi-

owed 30 . . . Rxa5 Rx a5 3 1 Qxa5 Qxa5 Qa Qa8! 32 Qxa8 Rxa8 33 Nf Ra 34 Rd2 Ba4, or 34 Nb2 Ng4 with a quick

tion, and naturay aso lost the game. An amazing amazing combination, with wit h a tematic bow by the pawn as its finale, but considerably more complicated than in all the previous

win. 30 ... bx bxc3! c3! Three moves ago this pawn was st stiill on b 7. Fro From m this it fol folows ows that the sixsquare path of the pawn, whic wh ichh seemed so ong ong and impenet impene t 89

 

Chesss Mle Ches Mlegame game Comb Combations  ations 

rabe, assumes a completely dierence aspect when the advance of thee pawn is stim th st imul ulated ated by the the fir firee of

36 Rb8 Bb5 37 Rxb5 Qxb5

Black has a queen  fr fr r r and bishpp  a quite seriu bish seriuss material material

Black is two rooks rooks ahead, ahead , but the strength of the double attack is s great that the hopelessness of his

advantage. White's pieces are bunched in the crner f the bard. The reali sation f  f such an advntage advntage usually u sually occurs by means f a cncrete, bu purely technical, plan. Hwever, the presence f cmbinatinal mtives in the psitin, in particu lar the t he sea f weakn weaknesses esses int int  which the White king falls, cmpels ne to epect a new cmbinati cmbinatinal nal ut

position becomes clear quite sn.

break this+spectacular 38 g4inN 39 Bx game. ex 40

a3 combinational Rxe8 cc22 !! beacon. And here, befo before re u s once again, again , is the t he final final theme theme of o f the combination  the double double attack of the pawn pawn on d and c. The combinatin consists of three pawn mo moves. ves. 32 Rx+ Kh7

gxf5 Qe2 4 d5

If 4  Ng4, Ng4, then 4  . . . Ng4 Ng4 42 42 Re2 fe2 and the duble attack f the pawn crwns the matter. 4 ... Kg8 42 h5 K7

Zugzwang. 43 e4 Nxe4 44 Nxe4 Qxe4 Qxe4 45 d6 d6 cxd6 46  gxf6 47 Rd2 Qe2!

Now, after 48 f5, White once again finds himself in zugzwang.

33 Nf2 cl(Q)

48 Rxe2 e2

The inevitable has happened! The b 7 pawn pawn is promot pro moted ed t a queen on c. Here the curtain could be lowered, but the fact of the matter matter is that 1 5 moves later later we

49 Kf2 exfl exfl ( Q ) + 50 Kxfl Kg Kg 5  Kf Kf22 Kfl 52 Ke3 Ke Ke6 6 53 Ke4 Ke4

While now the pawn cming frm e7 has its say. And so, ne me double attack.

d5 + and finally White capitu ated.

will wi tness tness yet another pawn combination. 34 Nfl

tragicomic for White'sApieces o n tthe on heposition king's king' s flank. flank.

The pearl Tofartakoer the tournamen grandmaster called cal led th thee game Capabanca-piemann (Match tournament, New York 1927), in which White's deciding combination was concluded with

34 ... Nel 35 Rh2 Qxc4

Now aris arises es the the threat threat of . . . Bb5 Bb5 , which White can cannot not prevent prevent withwit hout material loss. 90  

Chesss Md Ches Mdg gme me Combi Combintio ntions  ns 

he run of White' he Whi te'ss apawn to the the a 7 square. The diagram features the pition it ion after after the 1 7th move.

Alas, the gift must be accepted. On 18 . . . Bb7 w would ould have have follow ollowed ed simply 19 bxa6. 19The Bxe4branch, Rb8 where the pawn

theme of the combination combination would be expressed more more strikingly, striki ngly, and perhaps even more beautifully, consists of 19 ... Ra7 20 b6 Qxa5 21 bxa77 ! ! Bb7 bxa Bb7 2 2 Rxa Rxa55 Bxe Bxe4 23 Rxa Rxa66  winning. 20 bxa6!

The positional advantage is on hite's side; his pieces are better developed, his pawn chain is stro strong ng,, compact, compact, in the centre centre  is a srong passed pawn. Black's pawns on the queen's ank already come under attack. ite's 17th move was a4, on whic wh ichh pielma pielmann nn replied replied . . . Qd5 , atacking the White bishop on g5. The initiative also is on White's side. The simple retreat of the bishop to f4 forces Black to enter a region of diicult defence. owever, Capablanca's next move shows that this initiative assumes a dangerous character.

There is also no comfor in There in 2 1 . . . Qd8 2 2 Qxd8 Qx d8 Rxd8 23 a 7 and he has to give up the knight for the "terrible pawn.

1 axb5!!

22 a7 a 7 Bh3 23 Reb Reb l Rxbl Rxb l + 24

20  Rb5

Or 2200 . . . Qxa Qxa55 2 1 Rxa5 Rxa5 Nb6 22 a7 Ra8 23 Rb

2 1 Qc7 Nb6 Nb6

The bishop is oered for sarifice, the bishop which would be so needed by White to dominate

Rx b 1 f5 2 5 BO f4 26 Rxb 2 6 exf4 exf4 Back resigned

he weakened black in the opponent's camp. In sqares the process of ombination, such positional considerations do not begin to come ino he reckoning.

The pawn is "aggression Labourdonnais reminiscen of the fnal part of the game,  game,  mysovBotvinnik, played in mysov 1941 in the matchournament for the title of absolute champion of

1

••

Qxg5

91  

Chess Mdleg Mdlegame ame Combia Combiations  tions 

the UR. We give the position after the 55th move.

White has two connected passed pawns, breaking through to the cherished 8th rank, but Back has not two, but three connected passed pawns, out of which one  on th thee b2 square square  aready aready fi find ndss itsef on the eve of its triumph  arriva at the queening square. 56 a6

Otherw Othe rwis isee Bac Backk wi pay pay . . . c2 . No w , however, however, this is not good, good, if ony on y in view of of 5 7 Rxb2 Rxb2 c  (Q) 58 Rxc Rxc + 59 Kh2, and there is nothing eft for Back but to give back ba ck the the rook by . . . Rxb6. Rxb6. On White's move, Back repies with a combination with a rook sacriice. 5 6 Rx Rxb6! b6! 57 Rx Rxb6 b6 d3 ! 558 8 Rg Rg l d2! 59 Rx Rc7 •••

is a position positi on from from the game Kotov Ragozin ( 1 7th UR UR Cham Champi pion on-ship, Moscow 1949)

27 b5!

"The beginning of the most beautifu combination that I have ever managed to create on the chessbord noted Kotov, apropos this move. He gives further the basic branch coming out of his combinationa idea. It consists of 2 7 c5 2 8 dxc5 dxc5!! Qxe5 Qxe5 2 9 cxb cxb6 6 Rxc33 30 b Rxc bxa7 xa7 Rxc Rxc22 3 1 Rxc2 Rxc2 •••

"A rare rare position  writes the the author author of the combination in concusion  the White pawn, competing the marchh d4 marc d4c5b c5b6a 6a 7, is inevitaby promoted to a queen, since three Back pieces cannot prevent this.

But no not 54 . . . c 60 Rf7 + Kh8 61 R Rff6  dra draw. 60 R6

o as, on 60 ... c, to repy 61 R6g5. 60

••

dl(Q)! White resigned.

I f 6 1 Rxd Rxd , then 6 1 . . . c2 . A few more exampes. Before us 92  

Chess Mlega Mlegame me Com Combiati biations  ons 

The theme The t heme of doube attack with w ith  pa pawn wn fin finds ds its its bri br iiian antt expression expre ssion i this variation. True, the b8

combina tion, to remove it combination, i t fr from the creative process, this is approximatey the th e same same thing as depriving

pi pint nt is defended, defended, but bu t the a8 point is inaccessibe to Back. I f h e r e 3 1 . . . Q a 1 + , then simpy 32 Bf Bf . Our ook at exampes exampes could so so have been competed with wit h this t his iustr ius tration ation of the theme in a comentary variation, but the disapintment which overtook Kotov i con conne nection ction with Ragozin's Ragozin's repy re py 27 . . . Rac 7, and and the statement statement y y i apropos this consideration, consideration , obliges us to respond with a itte mment. Aprop Apropos os 27 27 . . . Rac7, in place of of the natur natura a 27 . . . c5 which was anticipated by White, Kotov wrote, "In our century, an oppoet does not give one the chance t carry out bea beautifu utifu combinations combina tions d pre prefe fers rs to s impy imp y be b e eft a pawn dwn. In this way, grandmaster tv, author of many beautiful binations which his opponents ud not avoid, contradicts himself se lf in trying to generais genera isee Ragozin's Ragozin' s decision and justi it by the tencies of "our century century . The quesques tin is obviousy about the increase increase i the standard of defence in "our etury, the improvement of

humansense. life of the spiritual sen se. and No activity matter matter how much the technique of defence and prophyaxisis grows both in our phyax ou r century century and in the future centuries, combinations wi wi  ive an andd deveop deveop fo for as ong as chess art ives and deveops. The match for the word championship between Botnnik and Bronstein (Mosco 1951) produced many interesting games, in particular the 9th game of the match, which provides excelent materia for the investigation of pawn combinations. The first 14 moves brought the opponents to the foowing position, with Botvinnik, as White, to move.

technique, etc. But, you see, combiations are an organic compoent part of the overa creative

The White pawn, which has made way to b5, becomes the her her  ofitsthe combination.

prce pr cess ssone of the game, gameimportant, , and, besides, of chess the most being inseparaby inked with it. It is pssibe to prevent an arising treat of a combination or combiationa trap, but to prevent any

15 b6! Bxa4 16 b7

There is no doube attack, but even a singe one is suicient to remain with an extra rook. 93 

 

Chess Mle Mlegame game Comb Combination inations  s 

6 Bxb3  7 bxa8( 8(Q) Q) B Bb b6  8 axb3 •••

The result of the ecelle e cellent nt pawn com combin ation on  is at hand. d. of the Tobinati conclude, in han praise pawn, we want want to show one classic, old combination. In it, the pawn presents itself in such a varied role that it is diicult even to have any idea where hard and fast rules can limit it. Before us is a position from the 13th game of the match between Tarrash and Marsha, played in

1906. In this game, Marshall played White.

Here alre al ready ady is the first combinacombin ation on the theme of the pin. 32 Qd44 was dang Qd dangerous, erous, in view of 32 . . . Rc2 3 3 Qd5 Qd cd cd55advantage 34 Nd4 Rc8! 35 Nf5 Rf8 5with to Black. 32

•••

Qx6 33 b5+ Ka5

Black is stil st illl on the lookout lookou t for for a double attack with the knight, which stops the king marching to the c6 and b5 squares. Therefore bad now isis 33 33 . . . Qb5 Qb5 or 33 . . . Kb7. 34 bx6 Rx2 35 Nxd4 R5!

Blackwith already needs to icient concern hi mself himself wit h a draw. Insuicie Insu nt for for this purpo purpose se was 35 . . . Bd3 Bd3 36 N c2 Bc2 37 g4 g4 ! h hg4 g4 38 h5 Ka Ka66 39 h6 b5 40 a, and White must win. 36 7

With the thre threat at of N f5 f5 . 36 Bg4 37 Nb3+ K 38 Nx5 Kx5 39 a5 Kd4 40 axb6 axb6 axb 6 4  Kf2 Kx Kxd3 d3 42 Bd6 b5 43 Be7 Kd4 44 Bd6 Ke4 Draw. •••

Black is the echang echangee ahead, ahead, but the positi positio o is sated with combinational motives; it is sharp and the position of the Black king leaves

Let us sum up a little. The combinational bin ational role of the modest infan infan-tr tryma ymann looks quite qu ite varied in al alll the illustrations given. Even the pawn itself mates mates and helps pieces pi eces in the

much to be desired. Marshall eploits this circumstance ecellently and, guided

set ting up of mating net setting nets.s. Breaking through into the enemy camp and through the blockading chain, the

by surprising combination on the his theme of double attack, neutralises the opponent's material advantage. There followed:

pawn the organisation of variouspromotes combinations, riveting the opponent's oppo nent's defensive defensive reserves to itit.. Quite a few technical methods fall to the lot of advancing pawns. They must "divert, "intercept,

32 Qx6! 94   

Chess Mlegam Mlegamee Com Combation bations  s 

and "destroy. A real performer finds many ombinational ideas in them. To

the knight on  with the bishop. He should begin to move on the queen's flank, for eample, by 19

onclude, present game in hich White Whiwe te carries carri es outa an eceponal combination with the help o a pawn.

. . . a , and andon White wou be ablea to carry his would lineld not in such carefree way as in the game.

Ialian Game

hite: .Tartakover Black: A.Rubinstein Iternationall tournament Iternationa tournament oscow 925)

 e5 e5 2 N3 N6 3 B4 Nf6 4 d3 Bc5 5 Be3 d6 6 Bx5 dxc5 7 ge2 Na5 8 Bb3 Nxb3 9 axb3   0 0-0 0-0 Ng4   h3 N Nh6 h6  2 ff4 4

The manoeu manoeuvr vree . . . Ng4h6 doe doess not justi itself: White seizes the inii tiative. in tiative . For For the present, present, it is sti ll not dangerous, but, possessing the advantag adva ntagee in the centre , White has a ba basis sis to count on its ffurth urther er development. 2 ... exf4

This is necess This necessary ary  White threaned to push on the pawn to f5. 3 Nxf4 f6

Black chooses the e5 square for his piece base. Indeed he succeeds in settling down here with the night, but it proves diicult to

2 0 N e3 Rad8 Rad8 2  Nf5 Bxf5 22 exf5

The opening opening of the eile eile  is favourable for White. Moreover, on e6, Black has ha s a "hole where where the White knight can head for. 22 ... Qd7 23 f4 Rfe 24 Khl Re7 25 Re4 Rde8

Black also cannot etract anything fro from this centralisation along the efle. White, however, having control cont rol of space on the king's kin g's flank flank , begins to prepare combinational threats. 26 Qh4

Already the combination Nf6 is threatened. 26 ... Kg8 27 Qf2 b6 28 Rfel Kh8 29 Rle3 Kg8 30 Rg3 Kh8

Not suspecting the enormous potential strength of the f5 pawn. Now a combination breaks out, in which this strength comes into operation.

derive bnet from this due to the t that the initiative continues to ain in White's hands. 4 Q N e7 5 Rf2 Rf2 Ne5 Ne5  6h8 Qg3 Qg 9 3 6  7N Nh h5 Q Qe7 8 Ra Rafl fl Kh8 K dl Bd7

A very passive move, which, oreover, entails a loss of tempo   a move later, Black has to take 9 5    

Chess Mdle Mdlegame game Co Combat mbatns  ns 

3 1 Rxg7

Expoding a mine in a we protected for fortt . The rook opens the way

the theme of the combination: it deserves a diagram.

for its tu, freesthe theknight, way forwhich, the f5inpawn. 31

•• ••• •

Rxg7 32 Nx6

The doube attack of the knight here appear appearss , as it were were,, as a transit theme. 32 Q4!

•

Qe7 33 Nxe8 Qxe8 34

The queen prepares the advance of the pawn. An immediate 34 f6 woud be unnecessary haste, in view of 34 . . . Rg5 Rg5 35 Q Qff4 h6, and White Wh ite has no compensation compensat ion for for the piece. 34

•••

Re7

The forced forced advance adva nce of the White Whit e pawn to  brings with it ruin for Back. 35 ! Ng6

On 35 35 . . . Re6 folows the the thematic finae: 36 Rxe5! Rxe5 37  Re  + 38 Kh2 Qf8 39 Qf Qf66 + and mate on the foowing move. 36 Rxe7 ! N Nx xe7 37  ! !

Here this move aso embodies

Bck resigned.

In his mind he foresees the folowing mate, hanging over his ki king ng:: 3 7 . . . Qf Qf8 38 Q6 + Qg7 39 39 f8(Q)+ Ng8 40 Qxg7 ate. With this we concude our account of the combinationa wonders of the magic pawn. Passing on to the next chapter, we, however, in no way intend to take eave of the pawns    combinationa participants  for ever. ever. We wi certainy sti wi st i come come across across the time and again when we examine individual combinational ideas. -

96  

Chapter Nine Posional Weaknesses  Motive of a Combinaon. Cnns prvkd y wknsss n h csd psn  Scr S cr c c   shp shp  r h h g3 , h3, h3 , g6, h6 pn pns  s 

he combinational motives to which we have already given so uch consideration, present themselves as nothing other than weaknesses of a position. The

nent, develops into a combinational method of action, is served by the following ol lowing game by N imzoimzo vich. Here it is appropriate to metion that Nimzovich knew to per-

lockedin king, ep epose osedd po posit sition ionundefended of the the kking ing pieces,  all al l of of these are minuses, which, upon opportune conditions, allow combinationa nat ionall ideas ideas t o come to the th e ffoore of the struggle. On the other hand, a po posisititional onal weakness in the the llight ight of weak squares, undefended or insufficiently defended points, open less , ranks le ranks and and diagonals diagonals  can, in accordance with the position, play

fection the elements of the tional struggle. He wrote deepposiesMy y ystem, yst em, My sayss on this say th is theme theme M

the th of combinational a combinational combinati onalmotive motive. moti  heerle usual mot iveve.iiss a po posi sitional tional weakness in the t he castled region re gion.. Pawns Pawn s pushed pus hed forward forward to h3 and g3 , h6 and g6 g6 , quite quit e oft often en serve as objects for combinational attacks and points for sacrifice. The

ystem  Practice, T Chess Bloc kade. At the same time, Nimzo-

vich was a brilliant master of combination. Caro-Kann Defence

White: L.Aszos Black: A.Nimzovich (Bled 193 1)

1 e4 c6 2 d4 d5 3 Nc3 dxe4 4 Nxe4 Nf6 5 Nxf6+ ex

As shown by the practice of this variatio varia tion, n, more ofte oftenn 5 . . gxf6 is preferred. In the sporting respect, this move also gives the best res 

ults.

intss £, g2 , h 2 , , g7 , h7 if they int they are defended only with the king, can at any moment be made real cobinational motives. We recall if only the combination with the sacrifice of the bis bishop hop on h 7 and even two bishops on g7 and h7. An ecellent i llustration of o f how a plan, leading to the formation of sition si tional al weaknesses for for the the oppo

6 c3

The important The impor tant opening theoretitheoret ician, oviet master Rauser, successfully employed here a plan involving g3 and Bg2. From this square the bishop bi shop later supports suppor ts the advance of paw pawns ns on the e eft ft flank, flank, where White has available a "pawn majority. 97

 

Chess Che ss M Mleg legame ame Com Combia biation tions  s 

6 Bd6 7 Bd3 0 00 8 Qc2 h6 9 Ne22 Qc Ne Qc77 1 0 Be3 Be3 Nd Nd77 1 1 Qd Qd22 •••

Now White threatens the combination Bxh6 and, as itabout were, the reminds the opponent weakness of the h6 point. We, Back might be peased with this reminder and, of course, he forestas the threat. Nevertheess is it worth osing time in order to to create a threat which is easiy parried? Of course it is not worth it. Possiby the threat seemed irresistibe to Asztaos, or, most probaby, that the doube doub e attack on on h6, h 6, accordi according ng to the thinking of the Hungarian master, must restrict Back, who woud have to continuay watch over this weakness of his. uch a motivation for action is nevertheess incorrect. incorrect. It is not necessary to create a threat for the sake of a threat, but to pan the game. Veryy go Ver good was was 1 1 000 00 0 with a subsequent pawn storm on the king's ank, whie it was possibe aso to begin immediatey the active oper operation ation 1 1 h4, foowed oowed by g4, with the threat gS. In such a sharp attack, the combinationa tension woud woud aso inevitaby in evitaby have

Ony by 13 000 coud White eave himsef free to attack on the king's ank, but he obviousy avoid avo idss sharp sha rp pay pand ay,, preerr pre erring ingsecuring carefu carefu manoeuvring a 100% of his own king's position. 13

•••

Bxe3 14 e3 N

ince the darksquared bishops have been exchanged, Nimzovich's pan wi consist of creating a weakness of the back squares in the opponent's camp. The basis of this pan ies in the advance of the cpawn, therefore it is usefu for White to immediatey pay 1 5 b4. 15 R Rf2 f2 Qe Qe7 1 6 e4 Be Be6 6 1 7 a3 a3 cS

Back provokes the advance of the dpawn, which woud give him the possibiity of expoiting the good pi piece ece base on the eS square. square . 1 8 Ra f 

Whi te'ss new White' new threat is the the combicombi nation 19 Rxf6 gxf6 20 Qxh6 Bg4 2 1 Rf4 , and Back find findss himsef hi msef under a mating attack. Nevertheess, White's move deserves censure, since it forces Back into a strong stro ng continuation, which signifsignifcanty improves his chances in the future deveopment of the strugge. Undoubtedy, better was 18 NhS,

again threatening Rxf6, and if 18 . . . Bg4, then 1 9 Nf N f4 with the threat of NdS.

to increase. 11

•••

Re8 12 Ng3?

But this aready is not at a in thee spir th s piritit of the the posit pos ition ion.. Of course,

(ee diagram next page •••

12 000 was correct. sacrifice of the bishop on h6The woud now have been mistaken, in view of the reppy 1 3 . . . Bf4, aft re after 1 2 Bxh6 gx gxh6 h6 1 3 Qxh6. Qxh6.

1 8A beautifu cxd4! and convincing re-

tort to White's combinationa combinatio na idea. On 19 Rxf Rxf6 now now foow oowss 19 . . . dxc3 20 bxc3 gxf6 21 Qxh6 QcS+ 22 Kh QgS. On the ther hand,

1 2 ... Bf Bf4 4  3 0 0

98  

Chess Mdleg Mdlegame ame Combi Combiatio ations  ns 

gins to noticeably increase.

21 Ra8 22 Rl Qe5 23 Qf2 a6 24 h3 ••

Black, by attacking the d4 pawn, forces its advance, after which he can already hope to seize the initiative by eploiting eplo iting the e5 squa square. re. 9 xd4 Ng6 20 d5?

White continues to weaken positio position, n, and on castled territory territoryhis at that, and gives the grateful opponent grounds for carrying out play with a combinational idea. The best defensive resource here seems to us, 24 Rc8 Rc Rc88 2 5 Re  , intending, ding, on . . .  f4 , the the retreat Bb Bb 1 and cherishing some hopes of the sortie Qb6. 24 Bd7 25 dl Qg5 26 Rx8 Rx8 •••

A move which reckons only on an incorrect retreat of the bishop. Indee In deedd , in th the event of 20 . . . Bd7 21 Rf6 gf6 22 NhS Qf8 23 Nf6+ and Nd7, White would have the better chances, despite being the echange down. Worth considering is 20 h3, so as not to allow the bishop to g4 and thereby

Now the cle is also seized by Black Bl ack,, and the weakened g3 and h3 squares assume the significance of combinational motives. This incites Black to a combinational decis ion to the crisis crisi s of the stru struggle ggle.. The denouement approaches surprisingly quickly.

secure night. the h5 square for the

White is already and the begins to take measuresuneasy to defend h3 point, which for the present is still not threatened; however, the clouds are thickening, all Black's pieces are deployed very actively, and probably it is already not

20

•••

Bg 4! 2 1 R R  ?

This is already a retreat and an admission of the erroneousness of his 18th move. move. If 2 1 h3 , then 2 1 . . . Qe5 ! and the White Wh ite knight already

27 Kh2

does not succeed in penetrating to h5, while the springboard on e5 opens up broad possibilities of initiative fo for Black. White could cou ld con-

possible to prevent the discharge of the accumulated combinational tension.

tend for 21theBe2. initiative by continuing now After also missing this chance, he soon gets into an area of serious diiculties, while thee main thing is that the combinath tional tension of the position be

28 Qd2, for White wouldhighly be theunpleasant continuation ti on 28 . . . Ng Ng44 + ! 29 Kg 1 ( 29 Kh 1 Qh4 3300 Qe 1 Ne5 ) 29 . . . Qe5 Qe5 with the threats of ... Qg3 and ... Qd4+. By playing also simply 28

27

•• •

Ne5 28 Nf5

99   

Chesss Mleg Ches Mlegame ame C Combaons  ombaons 

... Qxd2 29 Rxd2 Kf8, Black obtains an endgame with an advantagee which is easy to real ag realise ise ( the d6 d6

also not possible possible to play 3 1 Kxh3 . Thee White Th Whi te king is thereby thereby virtuall virtu all deprived of pawncover, to the

squares). 2and 8 ...eSR Rcl cl ! 2 9 R Rd d2

otherand weaknesses is added thatone on g4, combinations arise after the other.

29 Rxc  ? N xd3 would would lose a piece. Also, 29 Qd2 Rxd 30 Qxd g6 31 Ng3 Ng4+ would be miserable fo for White. Combinations Combina tions with wi th double attacks sparkle from both sides. But also after after the move chosen by Asztaos Asztaos,, the combinational combinational discharge is inevitable.

Once again threatening the comb co mbin inat atio ionn . . . Qxe3 Qxe3 etc. etc.

29 .. . g6!

33 Rdl

An excelent excele nt intro i ntroduc ductory tory move to a combination in which all of Black's pieces take part.

There was no defence for White and a new combination crowns matters. The finale is elegant.

3 1 Bf Bf Bd7 Bd7

Threatening two combinations: 32 . . . Qxe3, Qx e3, foll folloowed by . . . Ng4 Ng4 + , and 32 ... Rxf 33 Qxf Qxe3. 32 Kgl B5

3 0 Ne3

If 30 Nd4, Nd4, t h e n 30 3 0 . . . Nxd3 Nxd3 3 1 Rxd3 Rx d3 QeS + and and . . . Qxe4. Qxe4. Whit Wh itee is mated in two moves after 30 Ng3 Ng4+

33 ... Qxe3! 34 Qxe3 Rxdl 35 Q6 Ng4 36 g3 Bxf Bxf ! Wh Whit itee res res ined.

And so, a positional weakness,

The mate The mate by . . . Bh Bh33 is inevitable. Let us try to again retrace the whole process of play in this ins-

arising aris ing inpanning the the process of of Black's Black' s purposeful pay, is expoited in a combinational way. The beautiful tif ul idea: idea: 3 1 gxh3 gxh3 N + . The The White queen is forciby diverted fr from om defenc defencee of the g  square s quare.. It is is

tructive In thegame. opening stage, White did not feel feel bad. bad . Black Bla ck chose chose a diicult diicul t vaaton of the CaroKann efence, in which Black's construction of pawns on the king's

30 .. . Bxh Bxh33 !

100  

Chesss  leg Ches legame ameCom Comba bat tons  ons 

ank was not quite satisfactory. hitee secured himsel hit h imselff a firm irm centre and stoo stoodd quite qu ite well w ell on the anks anks..

great combinational tension. Beginning from the 28th 2 8th move, move , the frst lightning appeared and the

owever, on hi the ha hand, nd, had toBlack, concern concern himself mselfother with prophylact ylactic icss  in vario various us direcdirections tio ns and particula part icularly rly on the king's k ing's ank. Coming out of the opening with an excelent game, Asztalos, instead of castling queen'sside to logically exploit his opening advantage, began to play passively, avoiding a sharpening of the game which in the created situation would have opened the way for hite to to seize the initiativ initi ative. e. Black then exchanged the darksquared bishops and won the struggle for control of the black squares in the centre. White's 18th and 20th moves, reck re ckoning oning only on a mis m istake take by the opponent, turned out to be a wrongful expenditure of time

combinational threatsonincreased to maximum strength the 30th move after . . . Bx Bxh3. h3. On the 33rd move followed a decisive combination by Black. In this t his game it is i s clearly clearly seen seen that the achievement achi evement of a posit positional ional advantage is a prerequis pre requisite ite for for a combinational decision, where positiona weaknesses assume the role of the main combinational motive. motiv e. In the same light, let us look at one mor m oree game gam e of N imzovich imzov ich from rom the touament in Bled.

1 e4 6 2 NO d5 3 N3 dxe4 4 Nxe4 Nf 5 Ng3

which was exploited was exploi excellently his by Nimzovich. Hetedachieved planned objective and achieved domination in the centre, creating a handy position for his pieces on the e5 square. From the moment Black finally

rather artiicial retreat withs theAai the aim m of avoiding early exchanges exchange and complicating the game. The continuation Nxf6+ followed by d4, frequently occurring in the practice of this variation and strongly recommended by theory,

Caro-Kann CaroKann D efence en ce

Wite: R.piemann Black: A.Nimzovich  Bled 193 193 1)

seized the initiative and began to prepare a decisive combinational attack on the 24th move, White further weakened his castled posi-

migh t have appeared might appeared dull du ll to such a over of of combinations as, not wit w ithhout foundation, pielmann was considered to be.

tionpositional with the weaknesses move h3. Aappeared number of in White's castled position, and Blackk had fu Blac full dominati do mination on of the e5 square; however, his seizure of the open cile led to the creation of

Nevertheless, theexperience fact that itand is confirmed by deep tested as a correct way of of obtain obt aining ing a solid position in the centre, should not be discounted. Besides this, the retreat of the knight is 101

 

Chess Ml Mlegame egame Com Combitio bitios  s 

nevertheless a loss of time. Also unclear is the choice of the square of retreat. Why g3, and not c3,

taste for a chessplayer to choose one or another plan, when presented with a certain choice. The

where the knightofwould have a greater amplitude activity?

chosen bygame, N imzovich leadsit to aplan complicated in which is diicult to foresee the various possibilities which appear for both opponents. To a more clear, and if we might say, elastic psit psition, ion, le ledd 8 . . . Bg4 9 h3 B B3 1 0 Q e6 1 1 00 Be 7 1 2 Re  00. The situati s ituatin, n, which here foreshadows a manoeuvring game, is more comfortable for Black, whose pieces have great operational operat ional direct d irective ive fr fr purposeful transference and manoeuvres. We point to the df le le,, the the d8aS diagon diagonal al , th thee marchmarchroutes for the knights c6d4, f6d7 eS, which might, mig ht, depe dependi nding ng on the future situation and curse of the struggle, turn out to be useful fr carrying out his planned ideas.

S



cS

Nimzovich immediately underlines White's refusal to seize the centre and already already strives to hinder h inder him from playing d4. None the less the move move . . . cS has rath rather er more more psychological persuasivenss than chess strength. A good continuation for Black Black here here is the sharp S . . . hS , and and , if White Whi te plays not 6 h4 or 6 h3, but for eample 6 Bc4, Black, by advancing his pawn to h3, seriously seriou sly weakens the the white squares on the opponent's opponent's kingside ki ngside castled position. 6 Bc4

Of course, this is not bad, but he would have given Black more difficulties now by 6 d4, and and , if 6 . . .

9 Be Be33 Bg7  0 0  0

cd4, this would then not be7 inQd4! the However, spirit of pielmann's style style , though though in the spirit of the position.

+ 11 10 BcS for QaSBlac, b4 The Nb4variation was favurable but now White threatens to take the pawn.

6

10

••

a6 7 a4 Nc6

After White has twice voluntarily declined to play d4, Black,

••

b6   c3 0  0 2 h3

Not at nce 12 Qe2, n which White rightly feared the continua-

ti tion on 1 2 . . . Bg4 1 2 h3 h3 B B 14 Qf3 NeS.

with harmonious pressure by several of his pieces on the d4 squasqu are, achieves a strng position posi tion in the centre where alread a lreadyy he is also close

ee diagram ne page

securing the initiaive. to d3 g6

 4At  first BdS!sight, the echange, of-

2

•

Bb7 3 Qe2 aS 4 Ba2

fered by Nimzovich, is not quite comprehensible. The f7 point, if need be, could have been easily covered by . . . e6. In fact, howeve however,r,

The king's bishop also places the d4 square under re. Black Black decides to develop both bishops on the flanks. Of course, it is a matter of 102  

Chess Mdleg Mdlegame ame Co Combat mbations  ions 

Black. 18

000

b5 19 Nb6

Giving u the apawn for the cS pawn Black's central and knightechanging would seem to ease White's mind. 19 Nxb6 Nx b6 20 axb axb6 6 Q Qxb xb6 6 21 Ne4 Ne 4 Qc7 2 2 Nxc5 Nxc5 00 0

with the echange o the whitesquared bishops, Black begins a deep plan of advance on the queen's ank, for which, rst of all, he creates lightsquared weaknesses. This is similar to his game with sztalos, where Nimzovich, by eans of an echange of darksquared bishops, began play on the weakened black squares.

Nevertheless, as now becomes clear,r, the measures clea measures taken taken by White Whi te do not avert Black's oensive on the queen's flank. 22

00 0

a5 23 d4 R 24 f4

With some delay, pielmann nevertheless tries to start active operations on the king's ank, the more so that Black's oensive, for the present present,, does not co contain ntain direct threats, while the knight is strongly strongly placed on cS. White threatens d5, then Bd4, and finally f5. 24

000

e6 25 Raal

5 Nd2 Bxa2 6 Rxa2 Nd5 17 c4 Nc6

With the legitimate desire fr the rook to establish contact with

It is clear echange of nights wouldthat cut the across the Black lan which which we indicated indi cated in the previous note.

the piecesWhite on the king's flank; however, misses the chance cha nce of playing f5. After 25 f5 gf5 26 Bf4 , or 25 . . . e5 26 d5 , the the sharpen sharpen-ing of the conflict does not lead to bad consequences for White 

8 a5

This operation leads to enor-

rather the contrary. Black would have to go in for 25 . . . ef5 ef5 26 Bf Bf4 Nd4 Nd4 2 7 cd4 cd4 Bd4+ 28 Kh Qc5 29 Bb8 Rb8 30 Ra5, which in the end

ous complications, the conse quences of which were impossible to foresee at the board. The development of a battle on the queen's ank enters into Blac's plan, and,t'sinstead meetng the opponent's opponen idea half halof fway , it would have been useful for White to create creat e a di version ver sion on the the oth other er ank. For eample, the advance h4h5 must cause some aniety fr

would probably lead estohere peace, though Black's  chances chanc are are somewhat better. In any case, this continuation was more correct for White than that which occurs in the game. 103

 

Chess Mdle Mdlegame game Comba Combans  ns 

Thus White's ast move coud be seen as the decisive mistake. 25 ... Ne7!

squares in Black artisti cexploits artistic fa fashion. shion the . Hewhite blockade blockades s all of them. A combination appears on the scene if, for example, now 26 f5, then th en 26 26 . . . N xf5 2 7 B B N xd4 xd4 etc. etc. as pointed out above. Neverthee ess ss,, White should choose choose this continuation as the lesser evil. 26 g 4 Nd5 2 7 RfJ

efending the g3 square frm a queen check, and thereby preparing f5. 27 ... a4 28 Bd2

He also has to make this prophyactic move, since, on an immediate 28 f5, very unpleasant would be 28 . . . exf5 29 gx gxf5 Re8. 28 ... Qc6!

The last preparatory move for the brea breakk . . . b4, b4 , upon which, with w ith the queen placed pl aced wou ld have followed Na6. on c 7 , would Besides this, Black defends the a4 pawn and the sixth rank, which also improves the conditions for the break.

takes the lead. 2 9 ... .. . b4 30 ff55 exf exf5 3 1 gxf5 a3 !

Combinational

threats

hag

over position. is a ogicaWhite's consequence of This the positiona break on the queen's flank. A colourful position! 32 bxa3 bxc3 33 

On 33 Bxc3 fol follow lowss 33 33 . . . Nxc N xc33 andd the an thenn . . . Bxd4 Bxd4 + with w ith a double double attack. 33 ... cxd2

And here again on the scene appears the combinational pawn, which we have only just left. It turns out ou t to be a real motive moti ve for for the approaching combination. 34 g7 Re8!

34 . . . Qc 1 + is parried parried by by covering with the rook, Rf. Now, however, White cannot prevent the combination with the exchange sacriice on e4. At the present moment, besides this sacrif cr ific ice, e, is thr threa eate tene nedd . . . f5 or . . . Qe6. 35 Qd3

29 Ne4

An immediate 29 f5 would ead, after fter 29 29 . . . exf5 exf5 30 gxf5 gxf5 Re8, Re8 , only to a concession of the ele to Black and a nd a future future derangement derangement of the itecasted position. Therefore Wh White attempts to also bring bring up his hi s knight to the right ank, and, already on the next move, tries to breach Black's casted position with wi th the longawai longawai ted f5 . But Black

35 ... Rxe4!

The atmosphere must be cleared, and the inevitable time of 104

 

Chess Mdlegam Mdlegamee Co Combat mbations  ions 

the combinational completion of the plan p lan of attack on the the que que en's ank draws near.

channels. Meanwhile, it is worth examingg 9 . . . Nxe5 . Black examin Black lose losess a pawn, but great possibilities are

36The Qxe4 Re8 37 Qh4of the comother variation

opening for ishim to takevariathe initiative.upHere a sample tion tion:: 9 . . . Nxe5 Nx e5 10 dxe5 dxe5 Ng4 Ng4 1 1 Bxe7 Bx e7 Qxe Q xe77 1 2 Qx Qx d 5 (o (orr 1 2 Nxd5 Nxd5 Qxe5 13 Nxc7 Qxb2 14 Be2 Rb8 15 Bxg4 Bxg4 with the better chances for Black) 12 ... Be6 13 Qe4 f5 1 4 exf exf66 Qxf6 Qxf6 , and, and, if 1 5  , then th en 1 5 . . . Ra Raee8 1 6 fxg4 Qf + 1 7 Kd Bxg4+ Kd Bxg4+ 1 8 Qxg4 Qxg4 Rd8+ and and mate in three moves. It seems that White White should not go after the pawn, but instead of N xd5 or o r Qxd5 , be content with wi th the modest retreat of the bishop to f4, on the one hand, creating the threat to capture on d5, on the other, however, intending to exploit the precarious position of the Black knight by h3. Nevertheless, also here Black could successfully

bination is 3 7 Qd3 Re 1 + 38 R Nf4 39 Qxd2 Re2 37 ... N3 38 Rl QdS White signed.

The struggle against agai nst the pawn on d2 is useless. It is interesting that it was just this modest infantryman which White, with his his 1 8th mov movee , willllingly wi ingly let le t through the fr frontier ont ier on b5. Now Black, first and foremost, thrreaten th eatenss to play pla y . . . Re4 Re4 , but ther theree are also other threats. In the following game, which was awarded a special prize for beauty, a catastrophe befalls Black on the g6 square. Queen's Gambit

White: H.Pisbu Black: H. Wof Inteationa Touament (Monte Carlo 1903) I d4 dS 2 4 e6 3 Nc3 Nf Nf6 6 4 Bg BgSS Nbd7 S NfJ Be7 6 e3 0  0 7 R  b6

defend by exploiting fact thathimself White lags behind in the development deve lopment of his ki king's ng's flan, flan, for example: examp le: 1 1 Bf Bf4 c6 1 2 h3 h3 N h6 1 3 Bx6 gxh6 1 4 Bd3 Bd3 Re8 1 5 Qh5 Bf8 etc.

In all cases, Wolf would have obtained a less diicult position than that which Black usually obtains in the Pillsbury Pills bury system. system.

Apropos this Apropos t his method of developdevelo pment me nt  see see Chap Chapte terr 4 in Middle game Planning.

8 xdS exdS 9 NeS

In earlier games, Pillsbury Pills bury made

10 f4 f4 a6 1 1 Bd3 cS 2 0 0 4

Black is 4in1 diiculti di goxod i s 1Bla 2 . ck . . Ne4 Ne 3 Bx B iculties. x e7 Qes. xe7Not 1 4 Bx Bgood e4 dxe44 1 5 Nxd7 Qxd7 16 dxc5 dxe dxc5 Qxd Qxd  17 R Rffxd  bxc5 1 8 Na4 with the the win of a pawn, but also the plan of a pawn oensive on the queen's

this move only and 00, which seems to after us to Bd3 be more accurate and logical. 9 .. . Bb7

With this reply, the opening once again goes into theoretical 105  

Chess Che ss Mdle Mdlegame game Com Combina binatio tions  ns 

ank, chosen by him, is at least premature, since White' White'ss attack on the ing's an makes much quicker progress. It apparently make ma kess sens sensee to play play 1 2 . . . Re8, Re8, and and then th en . . . N , in order order to st stre reng ngth then en the weakest point of the castled position po sition  the h 7 squar square. e. 13 Bf5 b5 14 R Re8 15 Rh3

Because Becau se of the the h 7 pawn pawn  this this "eteal weakness in Black's castled cast led position  the situatio si tuationn has has become threatening. On 15 ... Nf8, there would already be a clap of combination combi national al thunder: thunder: 1 6 Bf6 Bf6 Bf6 17 Bh7+ Nh7 18 Qh5 Be55 1 9 Qh Be Q h 7 + Kf8 20 fe5 and things are rather bad for Black. Another tragedy would unfold in reply to 15 ... h6. Then 16 Nd7 Nd7 17 Bh6 gh6 18 Qg4+ Kf8 19 Bd7. Thus Black's reply is forced. 15 ... g6

Theprice Th h 7 pawn pathwn is defended defended at ga high perice e serious weakenin weakening of the h6 point. As will be seen shortly, the f6 point is also insecure, and even the g6 point. And all this close to the king, it goes

to the defence, via c8. Best for Black would be to play 16 . . . Ne Ne4, 4, but White White al also so main main-tains the initiative in this case, after 1 7 Be4 de4 1 8 Qg4 Qg4 , and if 1 8 . . . N e5 , then 19 Qh4 Qh4 ! Th Th e continuation chosen by Wolf opens the important operational fline, and all the weanesses in the Black king's catled position, mentioned earlier, became real objects of attack. The posi position tion is sharp and tens te nsee  the the wea weakn knes esse sess be beco come me combinational motives, the atmosphere of the struggle thickens and a combinational combina tional discharge discharge becomes a logical inevitability. 17 e5 Nd7 18 Bxe7 Rxe7 9 Qf3 Nf8 Nf8 220 0 Rfl Rf l Qd7 Qd 7 21 Q 

Black apparently, does not notice the reply, but also after 21 ... Re6 22 Qg5 b4 23 Ne2, and then Nf4, his position remains difficult. 22The Na4!White Qc7 knight is invulner-

able. If 22 . . . Re Re66 , then 23 Qf Qf4 Qa4 ? 24 2 4 Qf7 Qf7 + Kh8 25 Qb7 an andd White, threatening Rf8+ and Qh 7 mate mate,, wins. wins .

wi thout saying that the weaknesses weaknesses formed around the king become combinational motives.

2 3 Nc5 Nc5

All five white pieces occupy strong stro ng attack attacking ing positions  a decis ive combination can be epected any minute.

16 Bbl Nxe5?

Black fears the advance f5. Of course cour se,, all is not not well for for Black with wit h the g6 square, square, but this could coul d nevernevertheless be further defended with the knight from f8. Incidentally, upon 16 ... Nf8, the possibility is opened ope ned to also move the t he bishop up

23 ... .. . Bc8 24 Rh6 a5 25 Rf4

The last preparatoy move.

25 ... Rb8

Black does not evaluate the opponent's previous move. The only possibility of resistance for him 106

 

Ches Mle Mlegame game Comb Combinatio inations  ns 

could be in connection with the movee 25 . . . Re8, defending mov defending the f8 point and, f the present, parrying the threatened combination. Neverth Neve rtheless, eless, the the initiative init iative  and dange dan gerou rouss at at that  remains in White's hands, while the combinational tension is not weakened. Ther Th eree could folow olow (on 25 . . . Re8) 26 R4 R4 Qe7 2 7 Q Be6 28 g4, wi th the th e threat threat of Qh3 .

hardly gives aesthetic satisfaction, since a quick victory could have been achieed even without withou t resorting to it. 27



Nxg6 28 Q6 Re8

Wh ite threatene White threatenedd a combination on the same same theme Rxg6 Rxg6 + , but if resistance is to be be continued then it must be by by 28 . . . Nxf4 Nxf4 29 exf4 exf4 c3 30 bxc3 bxc3 31 Rh5 Re8. Of course, Black would also lose here. 29 Rfl Be6 30 Qg5 Qg5 Kh8 Kh8 3  Qh5 Qh5 Nf8 32 Nxe6 Nxe6 33 Rxe6! Back resigned

A little combination on the theme of double attack with the rook.

26 Bxg6!

The black squares do their "black business. Mate son h8an and d f8 squares determines determine th theethe possipossi bility and the correctness of this combinationa co mbinationa blow. blow . The g6 point is a fort fort whic wh ichh defend defendss Black' Bla ck'ss whole strong strongho hold. ld. The point poi nt is that, that , on on

The following position was reached after 18 moves in the game Nomann Nomann Aekhine (Buenos Aires 1926)

26 . . . N xg6 , folo folows ws 27 Rxg6+ Rxg6+ hxg6 28 Rh4. 26



Rb6 27 Qxb6

This "eective move served, it seems, as the main basis for awarding Pis bury bu ry the th e spec s pecia iall prize for briliancy. However, How ever, after 27 Bxh 7 + (or 2 7 Bxf7 Bx f7 + ) , Black would probably have recognised that further pay was useless. uch a queen sacriice

Black is threatening to win the exchan exch ange ge by playing playing . . . Ng4. If White plays 19 h3, then his opponent is provoked immediately into makin mak ingg a combin combinati ation: on: 19 . . . Bxh3 20 gh3 Qd7 21 Bc4 Nxh3+ 22 Kf b5 23 Bd3 Ng4 107

 

Chess Mleg Mlegame ame Combin Combination ations  s 

etc. The game continued:

ness of the sacrifice.

19 Rdl Ng4 20 Reel Kh8

25 gxh3 Nxh3+ 26 Kfl

Black intends to pplay lay . . . f6 f6 and and then, under the cover of a wellfortified centre, to prepare an offensive on the king's flank.

On 26 K Kg2 g2 could could follow 26 . . . Nf44 + 2 7 Kf Nf Kf Ng4 28 Q Qaa 7 Rb8 an and , if now now 29 Red Red 1 , then then 29 . . . Qf6 Qf6 20 Qc5 Ne6! 31 Be6 fe6 and the open ffile gives Blak a decisive attack.

2 1 h3

White gets ge ts nervous of the knight on g4, and he decides to weaken the castled position, if only to thrust back the rather "troublesome knight. Now the h3 pawn becomes a combinational motive, andd B an Black lack begins to concentrate his attent att entio ionn on on . . . Bh3. Bh3. 21



Nf6 22 Qe3 Rde8

According to Alekhine, the sacrifice of the bishop was unclear here. This is his variation: 22 ... Bh3 23 gh3 N h3 + 24 Kg2 Kg2 Ng4 25 Qc 1 Nh Nh f2 26 2 6 Rd2 etc. et c. Black would assure himself a draw if, instead of 24 ... Ng4, he played ... Nf44 + , but obviously this result did Nf not suit Black. 23 dxe5 dxe5 24 Rd2

26 Ng4 27 Qd3 Qf6 28 Bdl Rd8 29 Qc2 Rxd2 30 Qxd2 Rd8 3  Qe2 Ngxf2 Ngxf2 3322 Bc2 h5 and Back won 

King's ndian Defence

White: VGogdse Black: Fohr Intenatinal Tunament (Mscw 93)

I d4 Nf6 2 c4 g6 3 Nf3 Bg7 4 g3 0  0 5 Bg2 d6 6 0  0 bd7 bd 7 7 Qc2 e5 8 dxe5 dxe5 9 Rdl Qe7 10 Nc3 c6 I I Na4? Re Re8 1 2 h3 Nh5 Nh5

24



White's castled position is weakenedd by the advanc kene ad vancee of of the g and h pawns. Particularly weak is the g3 point, in the irection of which Black already begins to eert pressure, by placing his knight on h5. Tis obliges White to act with circumspection. White, apparently,

Bxh3

It is interesting that, in going in for this combination combina tion , Alekhine Alekhine was not convinced of the total correct 108  

Chess Mdleg Mdlegame ame Co Combatio mbations  ns 

was carried away with was wi th active acti ve operations on the queen's ank where, twoo moves ago, he began to prepare tw prepare an oen oenss ive. iv e. Theref Therefor oree he play played: ed: 13 cS

Cherishing the idea, sooner or later, of invading on the weak d6 square squa re.. The mistake l ies in the fa fact ct that th at Wh White ite does does not give due attention to the opponent's concrete possibilities and, as a result, overlooks an elegant combination. In the game there followed: 13 ... e4 14 Nd4 e3 15 Bxe3 Nxg3

By now opening openi ng new approaches to the white king, Black firmly seizes the initiative and quickly launches an attack. 16 Rac1 N 17 Nc3 Nfe4 18 Nxe4 Nxe4

White's position is hardly defensible. . . . NgS NgS is threa threate tene nedd and, generally speaking, the shattered defence his king appears as a serious of combinational motive, foreshadowing  new combinational outbreak. 1 9 Bf4 I t  necessary to shut o the

1 9 ... Nx !

emolishing the last bulwark. 20 Kxf2 Qh4+

The theme of double attack.

2 1 Kf3 Bxh3 2 2 Bxh3 Bxh 3 Qxh3 Qxh3 + 23 Kf2

If 23 Bg3 Bg3 , then then 23 . . . Be BeSS . 23 Qh4+ 24 KfJ BeS! 25 e3 Bxf4 ••

Black echanges the bishop which represents the heart of the defence. 26 exf4 Qh3+ 27 Kf2 Re3

Now . . . Rg Rg33 is thr threate eatene ned. d.

28 Rgl Rae8 29 Rg2 Qh4+ White resigned.

A splendid combinational rout, in whic wh ic h the positional posi tional weakness weaknesses es of White's castled position were brilliantly eploited as combinational motives. We return ret urn to the positio posi tionn befo before re White's 13th move, wishing to put the question: it possible all this happened isbecause happened of 13that cS ? Of course not, as the saying goes, it only poured poured oil oi l on the ames. ames . You You see, also upon other moves, White's weaknesses on his king's flank

would by no means disappear and, indeed, the struggle tells its own story. Nevertheless, in place of 13 cS, White should have conceed himself with fortiing these weaknesses weakness es by the manoeuvre Nd2  f1 , but this mean meanss yieldin yieldingg the initiative to to Black. Alas , at times, tim es, one has to come to to such a decision. decisio n. The reason for White's diiculties was, abov ab ovee all, all , the the move movess 1 2 hh33 aannd 1 1

gaing diagonal. diagonal.

109  

Chesss Mle Ches Mlegame game Combintions 

Na4, but even earlier White's opening open ing plan suere sueredd from from a lack la ck of cleaess of purose. For example, the pawn exchange on e5 was not in the spirit of the position. In the game, iyBronstein (HungaryUR match, Budapest 1949), the position before White's 24th move looked like this.

castled pton and represents a quite qu ite real characteristic of a combicombinational motive. All Al l the same, thethere followed: 24 0  0

He wanted to exchange first on e6, but, on 24 Nxe6 alas, follows 24 ... Bb4. 24



Bxh3! 25 Ng3

Not at once, but on the following move, White will be forced to accept the sacrifce. On  immediate 25 gxh3 gxh3 coul couldd follow 25 . . . Qg6 + 26 Kh Kh  R 2 7 Ng  Qh5 28 Kg2 Rxh3 ! 29 Nxh3 Qg4 Qg4 + 30 Kh  Qh3 + an and . . . Qh2 Qh2 m mat atee . 25 Qg6 26 gxh3 Bxg3 27 Kh Qh5 28 g g33 Qxh3 Q xh3 + 29 Kg Kg  Qxg3 Qx g3 + 30 Kh  Rf Rf33 3  Rxf3 Rxf3 Qxf3 Qx f3 + 3 2 Kg  Nx Nxc5 c5 3 3 dxc5 Qg3+ 34 Khl R 

Any chessplayer chessplayer would prefer Black's position for many reasons. Particularly Particu larly unpleasant unpleasan t fo for White is

A decisive intervention by the reserves!

the position his king. It iscenobviously bad toofleave it in the tre. Castling on the queen'sside also is not very acceptable. The king does not find a cosy future there. It seems that there remains

Bf2If 37 Qf2, then 37 ... Rg6+ 38 Kf Qh + a n d . . . Qxa  . 37 Rg6 Rg 6 + 3 8 Kl Kl Qh3 + 39 Ke2 Qd3 mate

35 Qe l Q + 36 Kg   6 6 37



The following game also serves

as an an instructive instruc tive and beautiful beautiful iillllusustration of the combinational exploitation of weaknesses in the castled position.

only one way out, to attempt to hide the king on on the king's flank, flank, it its own domain, so to speak. However, How ever, even in its own dwelling, dwell ing, it will hardly har dly find find itself its elf being left left in peace. You see, Black controls the territory on this ank. This is secured by the strong pawn chain, c6d5e4. Besides this, White has made the move h3, which, in the present situation, weakens the

King's ndian Defence

White: BGuenide Black: MTa 24th USSR Champinship (Ms (M sc cw w 9 57)

 d4 Nf6 2 c4 c5 3 d5

110  

Chess Ml Mlegame egame Combinat Combinations  ions 

This "indicated move, nt allowing the queen's knight to be developed "normally, on c6, is considered by many to be the best continuation. There are strng masters maste rs,, past past and and presen present,t, to whom whom such a wedgeshaped incursion of pawns, crossing over to the oppnent's territory, was a real support to their creative views. However, we have dealt in detail with the question of the constructin of a iddlegee Planning to wedge in M iddleg

te's planning prspects upn these moves are nt a bit wrse, and possibly even better, than upn 3 d5

3   e6 e 6 4 N3 exd5 exd5 5 xd5 xd5 d6 6 NO g6 7 e4 Bg7 Bg7  Be2 00 00 9 0 0 Re  0 Nd2 Na Na6 I I Re ?

This and and the  3 th ve are bad, since they d nt lead t any bjectives and weaken the regin f the castled psitin (the  and g4 pints) White mst strive as q  ickly ickl y as pssible pssi ble ffr the cnstructin a4, Nc4, B, n andthe in weak this way rganise pressure d6 pawn (Bf4).

which we now refer the reader. T h is, you see, isalso a purely psitional question. Nevertheless, also now we allow ourselves to give one cnsideration of a general character. A pawn in the opening, advanced t the ffth rank (for Black, to the fourth rank), quickly becomes an bj ect of attack attack . In addi addition tion to this, thi s, such an advanced pawn (we have in mind a central one) one ) , for the most

White des nt find a cnvenient plan, which, indeed, is nt easy Wrth cnsidering is 3 Bf3 Nd7 4 Nc4 Nc4 Ne5  5 Ne5 Ne5 Be Be55 6 Be2

part, signif es ina refusal signif to f fand ght fr the initiative the centre an agreement to concede to the opponent the influence of squares f a certain clour. In the French

missibletake carelessness HeThe shuld of curse the knight variation 4 Bg4 Bg4 5 h3 Bc8! 6 N  f5 f5  7 Bg5 Qd7 retains the better game for Black, but it might

I I  N7 N7  2 a4 a4   3 Q2?

3

•••

Ng4 4 h3?

While this is already inad-

still be a stubbrn struggle Now, however, ver White's king's flank blows a combinational whirlwind, which in the course of a short time produces terrible devastation in the White king's suite.

Defence, for eample, after e5, Black is oered the possibility f carrying car rying out play pla y on the whit whitee squares, while in the present variation of the King's Indian De Deffence  on the black. We present these consideration de rationss in order to show the t he subjectivity of the statement about which continuation, this or that, ( in repl replyy to 2 . . . cS) is bette betterr her here. Also 3 dc5 and 3 N are su su ciently energetic energetic repl replies ies here here . Whi Whi 

4

•••

Nx2!

The king is invited to come out. 15 2 Qh4+ Qh4+ 6 K Kfl fl

On  6 g3 follows ollows . .  Bd4 d4+ + with a quick mate. •  

 

Chess Mdle Mdlegame game Co Combatio mbations  ns 

16

•••

Bd4 17 Ndl

The combination The combinat ion is in full ul l swing, but nevertheless White does not sense the theme of it.

advantage. 23 Ra3 Rae8 24 Bd2 Nxd5

Also 24 . . . Qf4 Qf4 wa was goo good. d. 25 Bxd5 Rxd5 26 Ke2

Or 26 Nd5 Qh mate.

26

•••

Bxe3 27 Rxe3 Bxc4+

On 28 28 Qc4 now follow ol lowss 28 . . . Qg2+ 29 Kd Qd2 mate, while on 28 Kd Kd  Re3 29 Re3 Qg2 etc. White resined.

In the eamples presented above,, the sacrifice of above of a piece pi ece for a

Back is still a piece down and

pawn, taken ed from theascastled position, tio n, presented present itself its elf a combination with, for the most part, a clear theme, and quickly brought concrete results. In the following game, the correctness of the combination with the sacrifice of the bishop for the h6 pawn was, for a long time, the object of a great debate and, even to the present day, it seems there

the over White areofmanaging to go to pieces the help their king. The first impression is that the worstt for White wors Whi te is over. But this is only the first impression. The posi posi--

are opponentsorwho assert that the the combination, more rightly sacrifice, was incorrect. Nevertheless,, this game was awarded a prize less as the best in the tournament;

17

• ••

Qxh3!

Murderous trouble! On 18 gh3 follows ollows . . . Bh3 Bh3 mate. mate. Here, Here, this is a pure mate with the two bishops and appears as the theme of the combination. 18 Bf Qh2 19 Ne3 f5 20 Ndc4 e4 e 4 2 1 Bx Bxe4 e4 Ba6 Ba6 22 BO

tion of the king, attacked by four powerful pieces, remains highly precarious and threatens to become the object of a new combination.

possibly, in the decision of the judges, the surprise, diiculty and risk of the sacrifice, played a role.

22

Nimzo-ndian Defence

• ••

Re5

White: D.Bronstein Black: P .Keres

White will not succeed in slipping away with his king from the combinational zone. Thus, if 23 Ke2, then 23 . . . Rae8 24 24 Ra3 Qf4 25 Kd Bc4 26 Qc4 Be3, and Black, recovering the sacrificed piece, is left with a great material

International Tournament (Gothenbur 955)

1 d4 Nf6 Nf6 2 c4 e6 3 Nc3 Bb4 4 e3 c5 5 Bd3 b6 6 Ne2 Bb7 Bb 7 7 0 0 cxd4

112  

Chess Mdleg Mdlegame ame Comba Combatns  tns 

Black, wi thout suicient suicient foundafoundation, refrains from the strugge for equali eq ualitty in the centre centre by . . . dS . The exchange of pawns, which he carries out, pursues the aim of opening op ening the the possibi possi bilility ty of retreat fo forr his bishop on b4, but this, in the present position, is only a particular probem which could also have een solved ater.

dxc4

Here, the matter consists not so much of the gaining of a second pawn, which of course would not do any harm either, so much as blocking the way of the White queen, after NfS, to the g3 square (via  or d3) . 1 4 Bxh6! Bxh6!

8 exd4 0 0

Now Blac Blackk inte intend ndss to to play 9 . . . dS, but White gets there first. 9 dIt5 w ha6s unfavourabe wa unfavourabe to play 9 . . .

exdS 1 0 cxdS cxdS NxdS 1 1 N xdS xdS BxdS BxdS 1 2 Bxh7 Bxh7 + (poss (possib iby y 1 2 Nf4 Nf4 Bb7 Bb7 1 3 NhS is eve evenn more ene enerrgetic) etic ) 1 2 . . . Kxh7 1 3 QxdS QxdS Nc6 1 4 Bf Bf4 with a good game, full of initiative. Thereffore, in the meanwhile re meanwhi le,, Black decides to prevent the pin BgS. However, in the present situation, ther th eree immed i mmediatel iatelyy arises arise s the idea of

The 1 1 th and 13th 13 th moves prepared this sacriice, which Black is forced orced to accept. Afte Afterr 14 . . . gxh6 gxh6,, White's basic threat consists of

a sacrice on h6, while since Black is badly developed, White's pieces ae handily placed for an attack on the king's flank flank.. In other word wo rds,s, the hh66 pawn  is a weakne weakness ss

Qd2xh6 NfSN or 1 4  gxand h6 then 5 Qd2 Nh7 h7 NhS. As Black cannot defend the h6 pawn, his task consists of finding a way to neutralise the direct attack

of th thre reee White White piece piecess  quee queen, n, bishop and knight, and with his move Black achieves this objective,, admittedly with some material ive loss. Was there ther e anythi anything ng better fo for Black? Here, grandmaster Bondarevsky, with the greatest clarity, presented a detailed detai led analysis of this position, which proved that, even after 1 5 . . . NcS NcS ( recom ecomme mend nded ed by many commentators as best) Black could not save the game.

in the castled position, and it would be better for Black to think about something ese, possibly 9 . . Re8, though even in this case White maintains the initiative after the simpe 10 a3.  

 0 B B2 Na6 1  N5

The begi The b eginn nning ing of one one of the the deed eepest combinations of our time. White threat threatens ens to win wi n the t he bishop after a3.    eex xd5 1 2 aa33 Be7  3 N Ngg3

113  

Chesss Mleg Ches Mlegame ame Com Comnations  nations 

We give a few variations from thiss anal thi analyy sis: 1 5 . . . Nc5 1 6 Rae 1 ! (occupying the e4 square also represents a decisive link in the attack. atta ck. On 1 6 Qxh6, Black inincludes cl udes the bishop in the def defence: ence: 1 6 ... Be4, which makes diicult the further course of the attack. Thus, on 1 7 Qg5 + , Black Black co could uld calmly calmly reply ... Bg6. However, by continuingg 1 7 Nxe4, White nuin White eve evenn in thi thiss casee maintains the cas t he better chances. chances. ) 16 ... Nd3 17 Bxd3 cxd3 8 Nf5

material equality, but there are no pawns left in the castled position and his king kin g is totally expos exposed ed  an eective combinational motive. It is precisely this which determines hite's advantage.

Bexh6 4 (on Re8 Bc5 foll ollow ows 1 95 N + Kf88 2.0. . Qg5 2 1 s Nf Nf5 Re6 22 Qg7 + Ke8 Ke8 23 Qh8 + B Bf8 f8 24 Nbd6 mate.) 19 Nbd4 Re8 20 Nxh66 + Kf Nxh Kf8 2 1 Qg5 Q g5 Bg6 Bg6 (or ( or 2 1 . . . d5 2 2 Rxe Rxe44 ! dxe4 dxe4 23 Ne6 + fxe6 24 Qg6) 22 Rxe7! Rxe7 (22 ... Kxe7 23 N hf5 hf5 + Bxf5 Bxf5 24 N xf5 xf5 + Ke6 25 Re + Kd5 26 Ne7 + ) 23 Qxf Re Qxf66 Re4 Re4 24 Qh8+ Ke7 25 Nhf5+ Bxf5 26 Nxf5+ Ke6 27 Qh3 etc as indi-

A double attack. Both h4 (f4) and Qxc4+ are threatened.

cated in Bondarevsky's analysis. is indeed bad for Black. If, forIt exampl exa mple, e, 2 7 . . . ReS , then then 28 28 f4 Rxf5 29 Re + 6 30 Qh6 mate. Thus Th us al also so 1 5 . . . Nc5 left Whit Whitee a

are quite position. a few other weaknesses ina Black's Nevertheless more worthy crowning of this brilliant game here was the combination 23 Qxg5 Qxg5 24 Nf7+ Kg7

20 Qh5 Qh5 Q£6 Q£6 2  Nd6 Bc6 Bc6 22 Qg4 22 ... Kh8 23 Be4

It is natural natu ral that White Whi te wants to to specul spe culate ate on the bad positio posit ionn of th thee Black king, the more so that there

possibility of deciding the game by an eective attack. From this, another conclusion suggests itself, that th at th the cont contin inua uati tion on 1 5 . . . Nh 7, chosen chos en b y Keres, Keres, was the most diidiicultt ret cul retort, ort, for White, Whi te, to his hi s combicombinational attack.

25 N xg5 Kf6 Kf6 26 Bc2 B c2 ! Kxg5 K xg5 27 Rd6 Ne66 28 f4 Ne f4 + N xf4 xf4 ( 28 . . . Kf Kf66 29 29 f5 f5 Ke7 30 Rxc6) 29 h4+ Kg4 30 Rd4 Rf8 31 Kh2 and then Bd + winning the knight. A strong strong continuation of the th e attack was also 23 Nf7 + Qxf7 24 Qxg5 . Thanks Thanks to to the threat threat of of Rd4 Rd4 , White does not allow the inclusion into the defence of the knight on a6.

1 6 Qxh6 Qxh6 £5 1 7 N Nx xf5 R Rx xf5 !  8 Bxf5 N 19 Radl Bg5

The immediate danger has passed. Black has two minor mi nor pieces for rook and pawn, approximate

23 ... Bh6 24 Bxc6 dxc6 25

114  

Chess Mleg Mlegame ame Co Combinati mbinatis  s 

Qxc4 Nc5 26 b4 Ne6 27 Qxc6 Rb8 28 Ne4 Qg6 29 Rd6 Bg7 30 f4 Q Qgg4 3 1 h3 Qe2 3 7 Ng3 Qe3 Qe3+ + 33 Kh Nd4

On 33 . . . N f4 f4 arises a ne new combination with Rh6 +  There followed 34 QdS Re8 35 NhS Ne2 36

Nxg7 Qg3 37 Khl Nxf4 38 Qf3 Ne2 39 Rh6+ and Back res igned

The main conclu conclusion sion which suggests itself itse lf fro rom m the i llustrative llustr ative material teri al  is the presenc presencee of a close close intercommunicatio intercommunicati o between weak points and combinational motives.

115  

Chapt Cha pter er Ten The Comb The Combin ina aon onal al Attack Attack of the Two Two Bish Bishops ops,, Haon y of the the R ook s on the the 2nd 2nd   &   7t 7 th Rank Ranks. s. The Sacrice of the Rook on g7.

We have aready aready sp spoke okenn qu quite ite a bi t about the two bishops in Midd game ga me Pnning. Pnning. Previousy, however, this theme had touced mainy upon the process of planning manoeuvring, where, in certain conditions, the harmonious activity of the two bishops acquired specific strength. In a combinationa attack, the bishops become particulary threatening if their blows from the queen's ank, along two open, adjacent diagonals, are directed towards the side of the opponent's castled position. In such attacks the bishops promote many beautiful combinationa themes. One can cite the immortal combinationa attack attack in the game, game, RoteviRubinstein, where, epoiting the

Rubinstein also regulary employed this opening with White, when, in the present position, he usualy played 6 a3, so as, after 6 . . . Bd Bd66 , to continue continue 7 dc5 Bc5 8 b4 and Bb. 6 dxc5 Bxc5 7 a3 a6 8  Bd6 9 Bb2 0 0 1 0 Qd2

Thus White delays the decision of the basic problem prob lem of the opening ope ning  castling. On the the other other hand, also unfavourable is 10 Bd3, since after 10 . . . d dcc 4 1 1 B  c4 b5 1 2 B Bdd3 Bb Bb77 13 00, would have been obtained a perfectly symmetrical position, but with Black's turn to move. This means that White has lost a whole tempo, and, in the present variation, this circumstance has highly important significance. The correct decision was 10 cd5 ed5

powerful harmony of the bishops, Back,, with Back wi th each move, move , oere oere the the opponent newer and newer sacrifices. This beautifu game proceeded in the following way.

11 Be or 11 Qb3. 1 0 .... .. Qe7! Qe7! 1 1 Bd3?

The negative The negati ve side sid e to this th is move move is epained epa ined in th the previous previous note note . 1 1 cd5 was necessary. 1 1 ... dx dxc4 1 2 Bx Bxc4 b5 1 3 Bd3 Bd3

ueen' ue en'ss Gambit Gamb it White: G.Rotevi Black: A.Rubinstein

Rd8 And14so,Qe2 a further loss of tempo.

The White queen has gone from d 1 to e in two moves mov es..

5th All Russi Russiaa Touae Touaent nt (Lod (L odzz 907)

14 ... Bb7 15 0 0

The diagram presents a clear picture. White has lost two

1 d4 d5 2 N3 e6 3 e3 c5 4 c4 Nc6 5 Nc3 N

116  

Chesss Mdl Ches Mdlegm egmee Com Combina bination tions  s 

clear tempi.

15

•••

Ne5

exchange knigh , "Black which,will in the presentthe position, essential es sentially ly represent represents tthe he main ssupupport of the king's flank. At the same time, Back opens the long diagonal and both Black's bishops get the chance to open a hurricane of ire, along the ajacent diagonals, on White's castled position. Events are about to happen quickly and inevitaby. 16 Nxe5 Nxe5 Bx Bxe5 e5 1 7 £4 Bc Bc77 18 e4 Rac8 19 e5 Bb6+ 20 Khl Ng4! 21 Be4

At first sight the Black bishops seem to have been rendered harm-

knight).

Nevertheless, things are bad for White: the diagonal power of Back's bishops has reaced its culmination, the harmonious attack of the bishops with an irresistible and inevitable mate mate  a punishme punishment nt for the tw twoo lost tempi  hangs over the White king. 24 Qx Qxd2 d2

Or 24 Bxb7 Rxe2 25 Bg2 Rh3. Or 24 Bxc3, either ... Bxe4+ or simply ... Rxe2 mates. •••

24 Bxe4+ 25 Qg2 Rh3 White resigned.

Approximately a year and three months before this game, in the international tournament at Nrn-

less, but this is far frm being so. 21

•••

berg in 1906, was played the following game, which might have served as a warning for Rotlevi, if he had managed to get to know about it beforehand.

Qh4 22 g3

Also after 22 h3 would have followed the same move as in the game. 22

•••

Rxc3! 23 gxh4 ueen's ue en's Gambit

ee diaam next column

23

•••

White: F.MarshaU Black: H.Wo£

Rd2!!

With the exception of the bishop on b6, all Black's pieces are under attack; in addition to this hite is a queen ahead (for a

(Nrnber 906)

I d4 d5 2 c4 dxc4 3 Nf3 e6 4 Nc3 c5 5 e3 N 4 Bxc4 a6 7 0 0

117  

Chesss Mle Ches Mlegame game Combina Combinations  tions 

Nc6 8 a3 Qc7 ? 9 Q Nc6 Qe2 e2 b5  0 Ba Ba22 B b 7   dx d xc5 B Bx xc 5  2 b b4 4 B d6  3 Bb22 0 0 14 Rac  Bb

Both opponents' bishops are aimed at the enemy castled psition, but Black's queen is porly placed. pl aced. If it were on e 7, Black could have seized the initiative withh th wit th e move move . . . Ne5. 14   Rad8 Rad8

Necessa Neces sary ry wa wass . . . Qe 7

5 Bbl Ba8?

It is impossible t understand the aim of this move, though Black's position is already unsatisfactory since he cannot prevent the incursion of the White knight on e4. 16 Ne4! Nd5

If 16 16 . . . N  e4, the then 1 7 Be Be44 and and the double attack on h 7 ( Bh 7 + ) and c6 (Bc6 followed by Nd4) cannot be parried. 17 Neg5 g6 8 Nxh7!

All these possibilities are opened, thanks to the pwerful attacking role f the the bishops. bis hops. 18  Kxh7 19 Ng5+ Kg8

On 1 9 . . . Kh6 Kh6 follo follows ws 20 Qg4. Qg4.

On 20 . . . g llws llws the the theatheatic mate mate Bh 7 .

20    6 6

The only mve, bt it als des nt save him. 2  Bx Bxg6 g6 Rd7 22 Nxe6 xe6 Rh7

If 22 .. Qc8, then 23 Qd5.  

23 Bxh7+ Qxh7 24 Qxh7+ Kxh7 25 Nx8+ Bx 26 Rd} Nce7 27 e4 Back esigned

In the follwing game, the diagnal attack f the bshps was directed at the queen'sside castled positin. Cenre Opening

White: Consutans Black: Backbue (Bradfrd 90)

 e4 e 5 2 d4 exd4 3 Qxd4 Nc6 4 Qe3 g6

ince, in the Centre Opening, White usually castles n the queen'sside, Black prepares the develpment f the bishop n g7, where it will cnveniently attack the queen'sside castled positin. As shwn by the future curse f events, Blackburne's calculation is

completely j ustif ustified. ied. 5 d2 Bg7 6 Nc3 Nc3 Nge Nge 7 7 00  0 0  0 8 4 d5! 9 exd5

There is apparently nothing better; on on 9 e5 e5 ffol ollo lows ws . . . d4 . 9  Nb4! 0 Bc4 Bf5

The second bishp occupies a thratening position, in relation to White's castling. 1 1 Bb3 Nex Nexd5 12 Nxd5 Nx Nxd5 13 Q3 Q6

20 Qh5!

The bishops reveal their fire

A decisive combinational blow. 118  

Chess Che ss M Mleg legame ame Combin Combintions  tions 

ower.  c Nb4

With the decis With decisive ive threat threat of . . . Nd3+. White can defend himself against this check only by playing the bishop to c4. And so he also lays.

White is mated on the following move. The concluding position, just as the whole attack, is of rare beauty. The finale deserves a diagram.

5 B4

White resigned 5  Qa6!!

This eective combinational ove is, at the same time, also the strongest. On 15 ... b5, White could still reply 16 g4. Now, however, White perishes swiftly.  6 g4

Black's queen, knight and bishop are under attack, but the

In all the three presented games, the combinational bishops operated harmoniously along alon g two two adjacent diagonals. In the following eample,, the scale of activity eample activi ty of the bi bishops shops goes far beyond the ounds of the two diagonals. They will operate both along the adjacent diagonals and along the parallel and intersecting intersecting lines, but let us go over to the game itself.

horrible state of the White king, falling under the diagonal inuence ue nce of the bisho b ishops, ps, makes White's position completely hopeless. Black finds an eective combinational decision which kills the oponent instantly.

icilian Defence

White: GRavinsky Black: VPanov (2st Moscow Championship 943)

1 e4 cS 2 N3 e6 3 d4 xd  Nxd4 N6 5 Nc d6 6 g3 N6 7 Bg Bd7 8 0 0 a6 9 Be3 R8 1 0 Qe2 b5

 6   Qx Qxa2 a2

Black could also win by 16 ... Qcc4 1 7 gf5 Qa2 1 8 Qe4 Q Qe4 Qa 1 + 19 Qb Nd3 + 20 Kc Kc2 Qa4 Qa4 + 2 1 Kd3 Rfe8 etc.

Black delays too much the mobilisation of the king's flank. The un castled king, you see, see , is also a lso a serious combinational motive. It is

7 Be3 Bx3!

119  

Chess Mleg Mlegame ame C Comba ombations  tions 

enough to recall if only the game, teinitzBardeleben (see Chapter 7), and a few others.   a3 Ne Ne5 1 2 Ra Rad l Nc4 1 3 B B l Nxa3

Black decides to take the pawn. The move 1 3 . . . Be 7 was was stil st illl possible. 1 4 e 5 dx e5 1 5 N c 6 Q c 7 1 6 Nxe5 Nc4 Nc 4 1 7 Nxd7 Nxd7 N Nxd7 xd7 1 8 Nd5 Qa7 Qa7 19 Nf4

With the unequivocal intention of sacriicing on e6. 19  Nce5

its very death.

2 1  e6 e6 22 Qxe Qxe6 + Be7

Leadingg to mate Leadin mate is 22 . . . Kd8 23 23 Bg5+ Kc7 24 Qc6+ Kb8 25 Bf4+ Rc7 26 Bxc7+ Qxc7 27 Qa8. 23 Re Qc5

On 23 23 . . . Nb6 follows ollows 24 Bg5 Bg5 Rc7 25 25 Bc6 Bc6 + Kf8 Kf8 ( 2 5 . . . Kd8 Kd8 2266 Rd  + Nd 7 2 7 Bxe7 + Kc Kc88 28 Bxd7+ Rxd7 29 Rd6 and wins) 26 Re3 or 26 ReS. Black has no defence against R +.  2 6 . . . Rxc6 follow ol lowss 2 7 Bxe 7 + and Qxc6+. 24  Tryin Tr yingg to divert the the Black queen from the g5 square, on which the White bishop intends to swoop. 24

20 Rxd7 Rxd7 !

The theme of this attractive and surprising combination is the full

•

Nf8! 25 Qg4 Qc3

exposure of the exposure th e Black king and the freeing of space for an attack upon it with the two bishops. ix moves later, White carries out a further combination on the same theme, in which he sacrifices also a second exchange. 20

••

26 Rxe7+!

Now the bishops will be everywhere. 26  Kxe7 27 Bg5+ Kd6

No better better either either isis 2 7 . . . Ke8. Then 28 Qe Q e 2 + Kf7 29 Bd5 + Kg6 30 Qe4+ Kxg5 31 Q4+ Kh5 32 Bf7 + and Qh4 Q h4 mate.

Nxd7 21 Nxe6!

The logic lo gic al continua continuation tion of o f the the combination, which serves as an instructive punishment pu nishment for for the neglect to castle. The Black king is now doomed to cruel su su ering eri ng until unti l

2 8 Qd l +

This beautiful return of the queen to its original square opens 120

 

Chess Mdlegam Mdlegamee C Combinati ombinations  ons 

up broad broad possibi possi bililities ties fo for the combicomb ination of a thematic mate, problemlike in form, with the active participation participatio n of the bishops. 28 ... Kc

Or 28 . . . Ke6, Ke6, resultin resultingg in a pure pure mate in the spirit of Czech problem bl emis ists, ts, 29 Qd5 Qd5 mate mate,, or 28 . . . Ke5 29 Qd5 mate. 29 Bf4 Bf4 + Kb6 30 Q Qd d6+ Ka 3 1 +

And Black cannot avoid a rapid mate. For example, 31 ... Rc7 32 Be3+ Kb8 23 Qd8+ Rc8 34 Qb6 mate. The reader is probably noticing how ho w the harmonious harmonio us action acti on of piepi ecess helps ce he lps the th e development of combinational binat ional events. even ts. You see, combicombinationn  i s a loft natio loftyy form form of harmony harmony in the chess struggle. One can say that combinations are the consequence of increasing harmony in the operation of chess forces. Let us recall the game, AdamsTorre (see Chapter 6), where the harmonious operation of rooks on

the seventh (second) rank is usually accompanied by many threats, at times irresistible and which all by themselves can serve as a theme for combinations. However, it can and always will be a combinational motive, leading to new combinations, and, finally, su ch a harmonious invasion creates a whole whirlwind of combinational ideas around itself. Thus the harmony of rooks on the seventh (second) ranks, as it were, embodiesFrom all thehere elements of combination. comes that power which cannot usually justify the opponent falling under such a combinational structure. Let us look at a few schemes.

the eile led to the creation of a wonderful combinational masterpiece. Not only this example but also a number of others show how the rooks can rage along a ile and pursue the enemy king, which is running runn ing around around in a panic. pani c. N ow we want to touch upon one further aspect of the harmonious har monious operation o peration of rooks. For White along the seventh seve nth rank: rank: ffor or Black Black  the second. The operation of the rooks on

White forces mate: 1 Rd Rde + Kd8 2 Ra Ra Ke Ke8 8 3 Rh7

And there is no defence against the mate on h8. Before us is a position frm the game A.AekhineF.Yates (International touament, London 1922) after the 34th move. Not only the rooks, rooks, but also all of White's pieces operate harmoniously, including inclu ding even th e king. 121

 

Chess Mle Mlegame game Com Combination binations  s 

Chigorin (White), was this:

The rooks are on the seventh rank. ra nk. This culmination cul mination of harmony must lead to a combinational crisis in the truggle. 35 Nd7 Kh8 36 N! Rg 37 Rxg7!! This is the "point of White's combination. White could announce mate here in not later than seven moves. 37



Rx6 38 Ke5

Now on ... Raf8 or ... R8 White mates in two moves: 39 Rh7+ Kg8 40 Rcg7 mate. This mate also represents the theme of the combination, begun on White's 35th move. White now, without hindrance, takes the rook on

White is a piece ahead (an extra knight kni ghton for forthe a pawn) pawn ) , but bu t the thare e Blac rooks second rank very dangerous. The combination  Bh5 Bh 5 + , and al also so . . h3 , is th threareatened. The right ctinuation f White was pointed out by Chigorin, 32 Rxb7, but here he would have to take into account the replie eplies:s: 32 32 . . . Rxd Rxd55 , 32 . . . Rxe6, Rxe6, 32 . . . h3 , 3 2 . . . B h 5 , 3 2 . . . Bf7 . If t he irst two are refuted comparatively easily, then on 32 ... h3 White would have only one winning movee , 33 Bg3, mov Bg3, on 32 . . . BhS only only 33 Rb3 Rb3 , and and on 32 32 . . . Bf Bf77  33 Nf4. Nf4.

f6. On 38 . . . Bd3 Bd3 or or 38 38 . . . f4 f4 follo ollows ws mate in four moves: 39 Rh7 Rh 7 + Kg8 40 Rcg7 + Kf8 4 1 Kxf6 Kxf6 Rh8 mate. mat e.

however there followed: 32 B? Rxh2 + and White resigned i n view vie w of of . . . Rd Rdg2 g2 mate. mate.

The dramatic finale to the second match between teinit and Chigorin, as is wellknown, was caused by Chigorin's surprising overlooking of a mate with the rooks on the second rank. In the th e 23 rd game game of the match, match, the last as it tued out, the position, before the fatal mistake of

The following game outlines for u the very process of the invasion of rooks. Petroff D efence

White: G.Marocy Black: F.MarshaU International Tournament (San (S an Sebast Sebastia ian n 9 )  22

 

Chess Mlegame Mlegame C Combinat ombinations  ions 

 e4 e5 2 NO Nf6 3 Nxe5 d6 4 O e4 5 4 Be7 6 Nc3 Nxc3

Qa4! Rxd3 20 Qa6+

Bd3 Nxe5 7xdxc3 e5  0N6 Q Q28Bg Bg5 5  Ne5  0  09Be Be6 6 2 e  Bxc  1 3 R Rax axcc  Qg Qg55

On 19veQa4, Black pro bably babl y have ha replied replied 1 9 . . would . Kb Kb8, 8, and, an d, if 20 Qb5 , then then 20 20 . . . b6 b6,, and White's attack is in a blind alley.

The game has proceeded very peacefully. A rather strict judge of positional niceties would prefer here Black's game, with reference to the pawn structure in which hite's queen'sside pawns do not form a chain such as that which characterises Black's pawns on the ing's ank. positional It is possible to give some more considerations, but all these cannot be deliberated upon because they are not very real. It is diicult diicult to anticipat ant icipatee most of the events in this position, however a combinational storm suddenly comes down upon White's position, which suddenly finds itself on the brink of destructio destruction. n.  4 Re3 Re 3 0  0  0 15 Re l f6 16 b4

Maroczy plays the game without inspiration. The move made by him cannot cannot be considerd consid erd as even a

1 9 xb7 +

19

 

Kb8

Now the question is whether Black is able to extract anything from the dile. 20 a4 Bd5 2 1 Rg3 Rg3 4 22 Bxh7

The attempt to penetrate with the queen to f5 f5 , and upo uponn this th is also capturingsince a pawn, be condemned, it is cannot very diicult to sugges sug gestt anything in return, return, without wi thout bending to the will of his oppo nent. ow, however, Black breaks through on the dile and the struggle at once enters into an area of combinational tension. 22



Bxb7 23 h3

Necessary to avoid threats of mate on the first rank. If, for example, at once 23 Qf5, then 23 . . . Rd  24 R Rgge3 (or 24 Kf Rxe Rxe + and wins) 24 . . . Qxe3! Qxe3 ! 25 fxe fxe33

Rxe + 26 Kf2 R and White's posi po sition tion becomes becomes critical critical .

hint of attack. Why does he not liven up the game by 16 Qa4 Kb8 1 7 B e4 ? 6



23



Rd2 24 Q5

Rd7! 17 5 Rhd8 18 6

This is already something, but Black has prepared for this prick and, togeher this, organises pressure on thewith dile. The atmosphere begins to thicken move by move, creating combinational motives. 1 8 Rd6! O course not 18 ... bxc6 19 

123  

Chesss M Ches Mleg legam amee Comb Combaons  aons 

24



Qxg3!

The moment for the combina-

tion requirement is ripe, and Black meet this of themust position. Aftter 24 . . . Rd  (which look Af lookss hopeful), he would risk losing the game.. There might fol game follow low 25 Rxd  Rxd  + 26 Kh2 Qc Qc  2 7 Rxg7 etc. 25 g3 Rxg2 + 26 Kfl Rdd2 The harmony harmony of the rooks on the second rank represents the theme of Black's combination. He threatens to immediately decide the gam game in his hidoes s favou favour r te by byde playing playin g m... Rh2 e. How White Whi defe fend nd hi himself? sel f? If 27 Rc  Rh2 28 Ke  , then 28 ... Rde2+ 29 Kd (29 Kf Rg2) 29 ... Reg2 (or ... Re) 30 Qf Bf3+ 3 Ke Re2+ 32 Qxe2 Rxe2 + 33 Kf Rh2 and Black must win. The White queen cannot abandon the f5 square, in view of mate on . Nevertheless White finds a chance for a draw. 2 7 Re4! Re4!

3  Qx Qxe4 e4 Rh Rh e2. However, there is i s for White just j ust one, nevertheless neverth su ent, re-, tort, but 28 Q, Q , and, and,eless if 28suici . . .icient Rb2 Rb 2 (a2 (, a2 c 2 ) , then 29 Kg Kg  Rhc2 30 Qf Qf (but not 30 Qd  Rg2 + and Black B lack wins w ins back the queen, leaving himself with the better endgame) and Black might even lose.

28 Qxe4 Rdf2 + 29 Ke 1 Ra2 30 Kfl Ra+ 31 Kel Ra2 32 Kfl Rgf2 + 33 33 Kg l !

White must manoeuvre accurately, withstorm. the king coming would under the rook Mistaken have been 33 Ke Rb2, and, in order to defend himself against mate, White has to give up the queen for the rook. 33  Rfe2

3 3 . . . Rb2 would now be be parr parried ied by the move move 34 Qe   3 4 Qbl Rg2 + 3 5 Khl Khl

Only so! 35 Kf loses, in view of 35 ... Ra+ 36 Ke Rb2.

35  Rh2+ 36 Kgl Rag2+ 32 Kfl Rb2 38 Qe4 Dw

An interesting and instructive

example of the energy which is concealed in the horizontal harmony of the rooks; an example in which White, to the end, did not want to believe that the raging rooks could not achieve more. By sacriicing queen,upon Marshall, undoubtedly,the counted winning the game, but it was not possible to foresee everything. It is suicient to say that the world champion of that time, Emanuel Lasker, commenting upon this

27  Bxe4

Tempti Temp ting ng was 2 7 . . . Rh2, on which whi ch 28 Kg  loses because of 28 . . . Rdg2 Rdg2 + 29 Kf Rb2 30 Kg Bxe4 Bxe4 24  

Chess Mdle Mdlegame game Comb Combati ations  ons 

game, pointed out that, by continuin nu ingg 27 . . . Rh2 ( ins inst e ad of 2 7 . . .

Now it is clear who has lost a tempo! •

Bxe4 as played), Black would win.Marshall But he did not notice 28 Q , and analysed analysed in detail only 2 8 Kg  . We look at one more game where the Back rooks secured themselves on the second rank. is time they were the rooks of the then world champion, os Raou Capablanca. Queen's   Ga

White: A.Nimzovich Black: .R.Capabanca atch-turnament (New Yrk 927)

1 c4

Nominally, according to opening catechism, the opening in this game ought to be caled the t he Engl English ish Opening, but the name actually given to it is conditioned by the position after the 3rd move. 1 N 2 N e6 3 d4 d5 4 e3 Be7 5 Nb Nbd2 d2 0  0 6 B Bd3 d3 c5 7 dxc5 

This exchange bears the character of a principal wish to force

9Bb7 2 b6 Nxc5 1 0 cxd5 xd 5 Nxd5 Nx13d5Qa4 11 N b3 Bxc5 Q 14 Ba6 Bxa6 15 Qxa6 Nb4 16 Qe2 Rfd8

At last one of the roks begins t stir; after a couple f moves, the other goes to c8. fter that, in turn, they invade n d2 and c2. 17 a 3 Nd3 Nd3 1 8 Ne Ne l

With astnishing persistence, Nimzovich strives fr exchanges f minor pieces, but thisexchange tactic is not justiied: afterhere each Black's position, and not White's, becomes better. 18 ... Nx Nxe l 19 R Rx xe l Rac8 20 Rbl Qe5 21 g3 Qd5 22 b4 B 23 Bb2

It seems that at last White has freed himself frm his cnstraint, but Black's Black's queen mano manoeu euvr vree . . . Qf6 Qf 6eS eSd dSS contains a concrete concrete idea which is revealed by his next move move.. 23

•

Qa2

Bravely placi pl acing ng itself it self at the head head of the attack in ft of its troops.

Black to lose a tempo, tempo , sinc s incee , after 7 . . . BxcS , it turns turns out out that th the Black Black bishop gets to cS, not in one, but two moves. In fact, however, after 7 dxcS, it is not Black, but White, who oses a tempo. If Nimzovich

The queen The qu een is menacingly mena cingly placed on a2, where it paralyses White's pieces; at the th e same time it prepare preparess an attack on the the queen's queen's an ankk by . . . a.

hadwould foreseen foresee n the opponent's reply, he have chosen rather 7reply 00., The variatio variationn 7 . . . cxd4 cxd4 8 Nxd4 eS 9 NfS NfS , as aso 8 exd4 dxc4 9 N xc4, does not lead to anything bad for White.

probably theWhite streng stre ngth th of of the underestimated th threa reatt . . . Rc2, but whether wheth er he could cou ld have have coped in general with his diiculties, the history of which take us back as far as the opening in this game, is a big question. On 25 Rad 1 foows,

7

••

24 Ral Qb3 25 Bd4

Na6!! 8 0 0 Nxc5 9 Be2 Na6 Be 2

125  

Chess Ml Mlegame egame Com Combination binations  s 

for example, example, 2 5 . . . a 26 bxa5 bxa5 27 Rxd8 Rxd8 28 Ra  Rc8 29 Rc Rc 1

30

Rb (or eve . s.. . ikewise, Rxc Rxc 1 + ) , 25 andRac th thee1 pawn on even a3 fall fnalls. does not solve his problems, in view of the same ... a5 or 25 ... Rxc1 26 Rxc1 a5. In all cases, the position of the pawn on a3 turns out to be bad. One can hardly severely criticise White for his last move; you see, it is directed precisely ise ly aga agains instt the the threat . . . a5 .

been eexpected by move, minut minute to minute.move The The king's posiposition is demolished demol ished and and soon soon all that remains for victory is to realise his technical resources.

25

•••

Rc2 26 Qa6 e5!

A little liofttleinvading combination, combination, havin g the the idea with havi the nother rook on the second rank, after which the combinational atmosphere becomes much more heated. 27 Bxe5 Rdd2 28 Qb7

It is not easy to defend defend the pawn. 28 Rf would provoke a combination:: 28 . . . Qxe3 tion Qxe3 ! 29 Bf Bf4 Rx, Rx, with wi th the well we llknown known mating mat ing theme which occurred in the game Chigorinteinitz (see page 122). The move 28 Qf however, brings White's position into a totally passive state. Nevertheless,

•••

Rxh2!

The discharge which could have

3 1 Qf3

A painful necessity: 31 Bxh2? Qxg4+ 32 Kh Qh3 forces mate. 31

•••

Rhg2 + 32 Qxg2 Qxg2

Otherwise he is mated: 32 Kh Qh6+ or 32 Kf Qc4+. •••

3 2TheRxg2+ open position of the White

king will wi ll continue to remain a real real combinational motive, and this deprives White of the possibility of successfully organising a defence. 33 Kxg2 Qxg4 34 Radl h5 35 Rd4 Qg5 36 Kh2 a5 37 Re2 axb4 38 axb4 Be7 Be 7 39 Re4 Bf6 Bf6 40 Rf2 Qd5

And, after giving check on e8, White resigned, though he might have still resisted for some time. With the followng game, on a great plan, we intend to finish ou

talk about the harmony of rooks 0 thee penult th penultimate imate rank ranks.s. However, it is necessary to forewarn the reader that, in the presented game, the question of the harmony of rooks will have for us even wider an

upon this defence, White still has chances of putting up resistance. 28

•••

Rxf2 29 g4 Qe6 30 Bg3

greater scope than case this. The question in i n the present ca se wi will ll not be be so much about the joint action of the rooks on the rank,  the combinational attack of the rooks on the le, however, the seventh ran for Black is, as it were, a territorial 126  

Chess Mdleg Mdlegame ame Comb Combnati nations  ons 

threat, thr eat , which wil w il l hinder h inder neces necessar saryy measures to oppose the storming

to deny him this possibility, Back also makes his own preventive

pressure on the However, th e ile. game itself, itself, spea speaks ks more than these few introductory words.

move. Of course, also had other plans at hisBlack disposal, but whether thay are better or worse than "Teichmann's "Teichmann's plan is a matter for debate.

Spanish Game

9 d4 Bd7

hite: .Duras Black: R. Teichman Teichmann n Inteational Tournament (stende 1905)

Indirectly defending the e5 pawn, since, after 10 Bxc6 Bxc6, the Whte pawn on e4 inds itself under attack

 e4 e5 2 NfJ N6 3 Bb5 a6 4

10 Nb Nbd2 Re8 Re8  1 Nf Nf B B  2 N Ngg3

Ba4 Ba Nf 6 5h6 0 00 0 e7 6 Re  d6 7 c 0 -04 8Nf6 h3

g6Now White's knights come up

If White's White' s 8th 8 th move mo ve was to some extent understandable as a desire desi re to secure secu re,, by preventing the pin of the knight, the advance in the centre d4 under the best conditions, then Black's analogous move with the hpawn could provoke even bewilderment You see, such pawn moves invariably lead to a weakening of the king's king's positio posit ion, n, and, consequently se quently , they should not be made without extreme necessity.

against a pawn "fence; Black's pieces, however, are excellently developed and and occupy good, good, active activ e posi posi tions. This is fraught with the possibility that Black will seize the initiative. 13 Bb3 Qe7 14 Be3 Bg7

Black loses a knight if he chases a f te r t h e p aw n  1 4 . . . ex e x d 4? 1 5 cxdd 4 Nxe4 cx Nxe4 ? 16 B B  .  5 d5

A great deal has been said about

All th s s so, but the fact fact of the matter is i s that t hat T eichmann's eichmann' s move is a link in the whole plan and, to a certain extent, expedient Black has in view the transfer of the bishop from e7 to g7, where it will be deployed much more actively

such a crucial blocking of the cen tre in Middlegame Panning. Here we can only say that if White decides on this step, then he will make it in good time immediately rendering harmless all Black's play on the efile and the ah8 dia-

and inn any improve Black's posit po sitio ion in thecase centre. To accomplish this tran transf sfer, er, the moves moves . .  Re8 Re8 ,  Bf8, ... g6 and ... Bg7 are planned plann ed However, af aftter . . . Bf8 , hite could immediately pin the knight with with the move Bg5 . In order

gonal. The struggle will now be transferred to the flanks, and, to prepare for that, both opponents obviously have to resort to new piece manoeuvres 15 ... Nd Nd8 8 6 4 b6 7 B B22 aa55 18

127  

Chess Mle Mlegame game Comba Combations  tions 

Nh2 Kh7 19 Rl Ng8 20 f4

But this this adv advan ance ce  is a double double-edged weapon. Black's pieces come to life and cramped sensitive weaknesses are a re forme formedd fo for White Wh ite in the centre. For example, the e4 pawn, or the eS and cS points which can become excellent bases for the Black pieces. What does White obtain in return? The file, and this, it seems, is all. N everthel evertheless, ess, matters matters are not no t so simple. White's pawn formation is such thespace White haveinga great that d eal of deal for for rooks manoeuvr mano euvring and organising joint operations. For the present, the position of the Black rooks is worse. Even if Black' Bla ck'ss queen's rook rook manages ttoo get out of the corner, the territory for its operations will  rather restricted, without even mentioning joint operations with its friend on the king's flank. The easier to achieve harmonious operation of thee rooks th rooks  this is the the main mai n trump trump in White's hands. The question cons-

of the g6 square.

22 Bxe5 Qxe5 23 Ngfl Qg7 2

N N7 were to succeed in conIf Black

solidating his knight on eS, his gamee would gam wou ld even be pref preferable erable,, but there is no way to do this. It goes without saying that the knight will be excellently deploy deployed ed on eS , but, you see, the matter does nnot ot lie l ie in one single position of the knight. Black's main problem problem is  the rook rooks.s. The solving of this problem depends pen ds largely la rgely uponstruggle. the character  the forthcoming 25 Ng3 Nc5 26 Qd2 Re7 27 2

Whi te exerts hidden White h idden pressure pressure m f and threatens, in reply t 2 7 . . . bS , a beautiful beautiful combination: 28 2 8 eS ! dxeS 29 Nh NhSS Qh8 Qh8 3300 RxeS RxeS 3  NgS+ hxgS 32 Qxf+ Kh6 33 Qxg6 mate. 27



Rae8

Black anticipates the combination. After 28 eS dxeS 29 NhS he can retreat the queen to f8. 28 Re2 Kh8 29 3 Nf6 30 Rbe 

ists only of the reali real i ty of this trump. tr ump. The struggle is now quickly sharpened and this means that it must inevitably enter into a phase of combinational tension, with possibilities for both sides.

Nh77 3 1 B l Nh

20

31



White was probably in timepressure pres sure , therefore therefore there is no app appaarent motive for this move. The continuation 3 1 Kh2 might hav havee been useful.

exff4 ! 2 1 Bxf ex Bxf4 Be5 !



Ng5 32 Nxg5 hxg5 33 Q

Probably preve t3he g4.Proba Becaus Becbly auseeto prevent of of hisnt the 1 stmove move, mov. e,. . White has lost the initiative and must defend himself.

Afterto long deliberation, comes the conclusion thatBlack this blockading of the e4 pawn is absoutely necessary. White threatens to carry out eS, after Nf3. The movee . . . f6, howeve mov however,r, w ill not do in view vie w of the catastrophic catastrophi c weakeni weakeninng

33 Qd4+ 34 Kh2 Kg7 35 Rf2 Qe5 36 Refl Rh8 37 Kgl Rh 

With the the threat threat of 38 .  . g4. 128

 

Chesss Mdlegam Ches Mdlegamee Comb Combations  ations 

3 Qe3! Rh6

f6! (a move which Em. Lasker pointed out, out , in his day) , and Back,

Nf NfS + BxfS Bxf S 40 RxfS gxfS gxfS 4 1 QgS + or Seven simper 39 Rf4!

ridding hisef the extra piece. ofIf,danger, in this retains variation, White gives a check with the queen on d2 on the 46th move Middlegam gamee Planning Planning ( indicat indicated ed in Middle as a winning wi nning continuation continu ation)) ,  then foo oows 46 . . . Kg7 Kg 7 ! (but not 46 . . . K h 7 ? which was was anay anayse sedd in Midd lega legame me Planni Planning ng 4 7 Rf RfS Qa  , and Back, successfuy defending himseff, threa se threaten tenss to to pay . . . ReS . If, If, hoever, RhS, thenn simpy the simpyfor48 exampe . . . Nxe4 49 448 9 Qh6 Qh 6+

On 38 . . . g4 cou coud d foow 3399

39 a3 g4 40 hxg4 Bx Bxg4 g4 4  R4 Bd7 42 Q2 Be

43 R!?

A storm storm begins begins , there there i s n o other way out fo for White Whi te but bu t a risky comco mbinationa attack, it is even worse to surrender the initiative to the opponent. However, Back does nott have a great no great choi choice ce  he must either take the rook or move the queen away to c3. It woud hardy be reasonabe to pace the queen on

Kg8, and again everything is in order for for Back Back.. From From th thisis it fo foows ows that the position in the diagram is unsatisfactory for White, and huring i ng himsef hi msef into a sea of combinationa compications was probaby the best psychoogica decision. In fact, what other continuation bes ides the t he rook sacrifice sacrifice on ffSS can ca n be recommended for White? You see, 43 b4 woud ony weaken his queen's fank sti further. rue, it

was possibe to pay in a passve  defensive spirit, 43 Bc2, but, after 43 . . . Qb Qb22 , fr from j ust the psych psychoooogica point of view, White woud fee bad. It is interesting that Duras' consideration j ustiies ustiies itsef i tsef,, and he now gets the chance to reay

a, where it is under potentia threat of the White rook. 43

•••

Qc3?

What hed Back back from 43 . . . gxfS ? Most prob probaby aby,, trust in the the cacution of the opponent or, principay, prin cipay, distrust distrust in the th e pos possibi sibi--

demonstrate overwheming combinationa the strength of the harmonious action of the rooks.

ity defending exposed Butofmeanwhie mean whie heanshoud shou d takeking. the rook and thereby immediatey cut the Gordian knot of the position. he foowing variation points to this:: 43 . . . gxfS 44 NxfS this NxfS + Kh7 4S Nxh6 Kxh6 46 Qh4+ Kg7 47 R

44 e5!

It is surprising sur prising that that  eichmann reconcied himsef to this obvious continuation of of the attack, cutting cutt ing 129

 

Chess Che ss Mleg Mlegame ame Com Combina binatio tions  ns 

o the queen from the king's ank which is subject to a strong attack,

47 Qx Qxf5 + Rg6!

and bringingbishop. bringing into battle batt le the inactive White Now already, taking the rook is strictly prohibited for Black.

would develop by 48 Kh22 Kg7 Kh Kg 7 ( if 49 . . . Rh5 e4, Qe3 then then+ 49 50 Qf6+ Kh7 51 Rf5 Rd7 52 Rg5) 50 R Qd2 (or 50 50 . . . 7 5 1 Q Qh7 h7 + ! ) 5 1 Rh3 ! Rx Rxh5 h5 ( also also no now not not 5 0 . . . Bd7 , in vview iew of 5 1 Rg5 + 8 52 Rxh6!) 52 Qxh5 Qf4+

44  dxe5

On 44 . . . N xb3, ther theree w wer eree several combinational refutations. One of these is 44 R5 Qxc4 45 Rxb3! Qxb3 46 Qf6+ Kh7 47 Nf5 gxf5 48 Bxf5 + Kg8 49 Qx Qxhh 6. 45 Rg5 Kh7

In reply reply to 4 7 . . . Kh Kh88 , the attac attac

48 Q6!

With the threat of mate in two moves mov es,, and and also a lso Bx Bxg6 g6 + and and Qxe Qx e 7 . Thiss double Thi double threat threat  is one of the the themes of the combination, begun with hite's 46th move. Blac finds the only way to save himself from immediate ruin. 48    Qd4 Qd4 + 49  ff2 Qd l + 50 Kh2 e4 5  Qxe7 Qxe7 Rh6+ 52 Kg3 Kg3 Qel 53 Qxe8 Qe3+ 54 Kg4

46 Nf5!

Combination follows combination, and White, of course, had

Not only Black's ing, but also White's shifts to find a cosy place. There are motives which also give Black the chance to think about combinations. Aganst 54 Rh4+ there is only one, but sufficient, defence: 55 Kxh4 Qx+ 56

foreseen it earlier. You see, only in this way can he prevent the threats 46 . . . e 4 or 46 . . . Qd4.

KhS Qe2+ 57 Rg4, but not 57 g4 Qh2 mate. Black finds another combination, which allow al lowss him to co continue ntinue resistance for still some time.

46  gxf5

Obviously the sacrifice must be accepted. How quickly an surprisingly the conditions change in a

54  f5+ 55 Rgxf5!

O n 55 Kxf5 Kxf5,, Black mates mates in two two moves. If, however, 55 by Rfxf5, then Black achieves a draw perpetual check: che ck: 55 . . . Qe2 + 56 K4 Qf2 Qf2 + 57 Ke5 Qb2+. However, now an interesting possibility of a check on g6 is also opened for Black.

combi combination struggl struggle. e. Onlybishop a few few movesnational ago, al the White might have been christened "the living dead, but now this same bishop plays virtually the leading roe in Duras' brilliant combinational idea. 130  

Chess Mle Mlegame game Com Combinatio binations  ns 

55  Rg6+

several important questions, purely of a creative creat ive order, and therefor thereforee it it

it is mated. new combination comes to his A assistance.

seems to sLetthat afterword is necessary. us an recall how the struggle proceeded. The first important moment, after a theoretically played p layed opening, came on on the 1 5 th move move , when when White decided decided to lock the centre by the the move d5 . As a resu resultlt of this cruci crucial al advance advance,, the game entered into an area of manoeuvring, where White had some territorial territor ial advantage and, as a consequence of which, Black's position was rather cramped. A very serious, principal moment, again again on on White's initiative i nitiative , came on the 20th move when he very quickly prepared and carried out f4, obviously seeing a way o attack.. However, attack However, afte afterr 20 . . . exf exf44 ! all the windows and doors opened for Black. He began to play again on the long long a h8 diagonal and and the central ele. After obtaining a piece base on e5, Blac Blackk blockad blockaded ed the White Whi te e4

Wherever the the white wh ite king moves,

56 Qxg6+! Kxg6 

A very beautiful inal combination, leading to mate, where the harmony of the rooks on the ffile even exceeds in strength and eect eect a similar interaction of rooks on the seventh rank rank.. The end, end, despite despi te its absolute clarity, is original and colourful. 57 6+ Kg7 58 R+ Kg8

If 58 . . . Kg6 Kg6 , then then 59 59 R2f6 R2f6 mate. The irst theme.

pawn and put out of action the bishop on c2. Then Black set up the knight on the weak cS square and the balance gradually tilted to his side. Thus, White's 20th move turned out to be not particularly successful successf ul . However, we w e should not

59 R+ Kg7 60 R2+

A hurricane! 60  Kg6 61 6+ Kg7 62 R8 + Kg8 63 Kh5

Now 64 Rf8+ and R6f7 mate is threatened. The second echotheme.

con confin e ourselves to this state It isfine highly important if statement. only ment. to try to repl replyy to the the question question  what thoughts and state of mind did Duras (he was then 24 years old) have when he deliberated over f4 and then nevertheless decided to

63  Qe2 Back + 64 signed since, eveng4at and the cost of

the queen, he cannot stop mate in 23 moves (64 ... Qh2+ 65 Kg6 Qd6 66 Rg7+ Kh8 67 Rxd6 cxd6 68 Rc7). This great game touches upon

131  

Chesss Mdlegam Ches Mdlegamee Comb Combat ations  ions 

play it. i t. The height heig ht of of Duras' combi combi national creativity, its culmina-

quic kly as possib quickly possible le to open open the position. tio n. The question arises why then then

tion, in the 1 9 1 2 , came after which he he bega bperiod egann to to 1908 withdraw dr aw from the th e chess che ss scene. scene. But in the first first period per iod of his creativ creativee work (19041907), Duras' play was marked by brilliant combinational thoughts and at the same time, an above average understanding of positional principles. He, so to speak, did not draw upon this side, whereas, in every tournament, his victories were distinguished by subtle, elegant combinations. In short, Duras won fame with a deeply pronounced "combinational style. In the very first chapter we have already indicated not only the deterioration of this concept in our time, but also to to the artiicialility artiicia ty of i t even fo for the epoch epo ch of Anderssen and tthe he I talian chess school. However, there is nothing bad or artiicial in calling Duras or some other chessplayer combinacombin ational. Any chessplayer can be

did the movehe15lock dS? Ithimself cannot inbe with doubted that, in making the move, Duras already foresaw the plan with the move mo ve f4. f4. Why not? not ? Duras achieved his objective and the position became combinationally combination ally strained. T eichmann, eichmann, in the meanwhile, meanwhile, played excellently. After the exchange of knights and finally gag he eS square (the manoeuvre ... Nh7gS), Black's pieces took up dominating positions on the board. Duras "builtup on th ffile, but the  point turned out o ut to be firmly defende defendedd by 42 . . . Be Be88 , and and invulne invulnera rable, ble, while while White got into an original blin alley with numerous weaknesses in his posi tion and an already not particul tic ularly arly safe king. king . It w was as then that also followed followed 43 Rf RfSS  ? as the only only and natural way to justi j usti the move move 20 f4, and all hopes and expectations (very great) connected with

called this, who strives, as quickly and forcibly forcibly as possibl possi ble, e, to provok provokee combinational tension in the position. uch a player often plays riskily, while at other times also breaks or bypasses the most elementary rules of positional play.

it. There, this sacrifice should not be censured, censured , even though upon upon the the correct reply it should also have le ledd to a loss for White. It was not possible, with limited time, to calculate at the board all the consequences of the sacriice. On the

toatthe move f4, onReturning one e could cou ld say say that th in th this is way20 Duras expressed not so much some sort of style, as an individual individual creative creative "I. He did not no t like, like , one one could even even say say submit to, lengthy processes of manoeuvring, and strived as

other declining of the hand, rook would havetheleftsacrifice White without any prospects for the ture,, with ture wi th several weaknesses weaknesses in his own camp camp and and . . . more or less less prob prob-able defeat as well. e add, as a further reason for RfS, Duras' 132

 

Chess Mdl Mdlegam egamee Com Comba bation tions  s 

creative tendency, and we come to the conclusion that Duras did what

g7 square is clearly carried out by White, but cannot Black realise, in

heThad to do. did not accept the eichmann sacr sa crif ifice, ice, replyin replyingg 43 . . . Qc3 ? and and this amounted not only to a combinational mistake, but mainly a positiona "bunder. Over the course of 23 moves, Teichmann rightly rig htly blockaded blockaded the e4 e 4 pawn and kept the White bishop ocked up, and then suddenly voluntarily set the bird free. This sharply increased the combinational potential. Duras, of course, immediately played 44 e5 , including including the bishop bishop in the attack on the king's ank and excluding the opponent's queen frm the defence of this flank. Combinations, which up to this point could not exist, now completed comple ted the rout. rout . The final final combination, where the main element was the harmony of the rooks on the ffile and the accompaniment of the king, completed a beautiful thematic mate.

alogous corresponding situation, an anacombinat combination ion with wi th a rook sacrifice on the g2 square? Both yes and no, I would reply to this question. Yes, because every position and situation in the chess chess game can be imagined with colours reversed. And yet, more than likely "no. We do not intend to give special consideration considera tion to the th e question questi on of the sacrifice of the Blac rook on g2. The fact of the matter is that practice hardy produces any examples with the t he rook sacrif sacrifice ice on on g2 , while the rook is sacrif sacrificed on g7 in many games. For us, however, the criterion for the choice and examination of this, above all and exclusively, is practical play. Even if we succeeded in inding two or three combinat comb inations ions wi w i th the sacriice of a rook on g2, then we would hardly need to examine these specially. But the main thing thing is that th at our our methodicall resum, in respect thodica respect of of a sa-

Amongst combinational ideas in which whi ch a rok is sacrificed, sacrificed, practice practice advanc adv ances es the combination combinati on with the sacrifice sacrif ice of a rook on the t he g7 square (i n the kin king's g's side side castled castled position position)) . uch u ch a sacrifice sacrifice sti s tillll cannot be considered theoretical, as is the sa-

crifice on crifice on g7, can always always be util ised for the rare combination with a rook sacrifice by Black on the g2 square. One cannot ignore the combinations of the brilliant Mor phy, where, playing Black in two games with LPausen, in both

crifice of6),a but bishop on h7 pos(see Chapter it is already sible to foresee a certain parallel. The question will be gone into further after an examination and analysis of a number of ilustrations.. The sacrifice of tions of a rook on the th e

cases sacrificed a rook on the g2 square.heHere is how t happened. ee diagram top nex ge The first diagram  a position

from a blindfold game played in New York in 1853. Morphy announced mate in 5 moves: 133

 

Chess Ml Mlegame egame Combi Combination nations  s 

ing the game, but, after conducting the inal part of the game inaccu-

23

•••

Rxg2+ 24 Kxg2 Rg+ (or

24 . . . Qh3+ 25 Kf Kf2 Qh2 + 26 K Rf8+ and Rxf7 mate) 25 K Qh5 + 26 2 Qh2 + and and . . . Qg2 Qg2 or ... Rg3 mate.

This diagram is from the game

rately, he had to be satisfied with a draw. Both these historical examples portray port ray for us motives moti ves for sacrifices, sacrifices, their basis, etc. It is important that the square, on which the rook was sacrificed, was defended only by the king. The aim of the sacrifice  is to demolish and expose the position of the king, but in order to exploit its open position after that, it is necessary to have reserves which will be ready to immediately complete the combination. In the first example, such reserves were the bishop on e6, queen on h5 and the rook on a8; in the second, the queen, two bishops, but also the rook which, in both branches of the combination, made the concluding (demonstrating the theme) m o v e (2 5 . . . Rx Rx aannd 25 25 . . . R Rff2 ) . An so  the sacrifice sacrifice of of the roo roo on g7! Above, we have already twice come across such a sacrifice

in the game ChigorinBird (Chapter 7), but the· sacrifice is only a fellowtraveller for other ideas  which was was ilillustrat lustrated ed by this game. In the followin examples, this sacrifice will be the centre of our attentin

LPausenMorphy LPausen Morphy , from the in-

ternational congress in New York 1857, after White's 21st move (Ng5e4). There followed:

2

•••

Rxg2 Rx g2 + ! 22 Kx Kxg2 g2 £5 23 

And here Morphy made a mistake, by playing 2 3 Qg6+  A •••

Here He re we game have aBery psitio psi tion n fr from om the the exhibitin Psbury, played in Bostn (UA) in 900.

ffxe4 orced24win wifxe4 n was was(also achieved after te ... bad isaf 24r 23 Rxe4 Qg6 + 25 Kh Rx Rx ) 24 . . . Qg Qg6 + 25 Kh Rf2. After Af ter 23 . . . Qg6 + , Pa Paul ulse sen, n, naturally, replied 24 Ng5 and obtained tai ned good chances chances even eve n of winn winn

ee diagam t ofnet page

White is the exchange up for a pawn.. In addi pawn additio tionn to this thi s , Black Bla ck has has two excellently deployed bishops 134

 

Ches Mlegame Mlegame C Combinat ombinations  ions 

(Petersburg 1909)

and a strong strong , mobile mobi le pawn group in thee centre. th centre . It would wou ld seem that the opponents have in prospect still a rolon ro longed ged struggle, struggle , but the the decis decisive ive factor in assessing the present position is a combinational motive. he g7 point is defended only by the king, White's rook has penetrated to the seventh rank and its activity is successfully directed at recisely this point. The reserves are also in i n a state of readiness: these are a strongly deployed queen, quee n, and

Now we can sum up. White has two pawns for the exchange,

a rook on e,There and potentially the bishop. followed also the combination:

Black's kingweaknesses is halfexposed, there are some around it, White's queen and rook, together

24 Rx Rxg7 g7 + ! Kxg7 Kxg7 25 d5 + f6 26 Rxe6 Ng8 27 Q5 R 28 Bd

The position is threatening; all White's pieces enter into the attack.

28

 

Kh8 29 d6!

Very good! good ! After After 25 Bxf6 Bxf6 + , White's attack is weakened. 29

 

Qd8 0 c5 Rg7   xf4

with the two harmoniously operating bishops, attack the shattered Black castled position, and this is still not all. Located in the centre on on the sixth sixt h rank, rank, White has a stronglydefended passed pawn, which severely cramps the opponent's pieces, pieces , and and , though though its pres-

2 Rx Rx g 7 + ! K Kx xg7  Re7 + Kg8

If 33 . . . Kf6 Kf6 , then then 34 34 Qh4 + Kg6 Kg6 35 Qg3+ Kh5 36 Rg7 with the threats of Rg5 + and Q +  4 Qxh6 Bgl + 5 Khl Bd4 The only move! 6 cxd4 cxd4 Qxd4 Qxd4  7 Qg5 + Kh8 8 8 Qh4+ Kg8 9 Qg+ Kh8 40

ence, hang over Black'seternal position.threats All this is more than suic suicient ient to j ustify ustify the combicomb ination. Black's position is hopeless, nevertheless the game, thanks to the ingenious defence, defence, stil st illl presents certain interest.

Bc Backinresigned Heand is mated 4 moves.

Thus in the diagram position, hite could coul d have announ announced ced mate in 13 moves. The next position is taken from the game Foacs FoacsBestein 135  

Chess Mle Mlegame game Co Combinati mbinations  ons 

3  R 32 3 2 b4 a6 3 3 Bf5 Bf5 a 334 4 a3 axb4 axb4 3355  b6 36 3 6 Bd4 bxc5 bxc5

tement apr tement aprp ps s this this:: "White "White   writes in the turnament bo 

37 Th bxc5 Qa8quee The e Black q ueenn breaks brea ks awa awayy fr fr

turns the ut stunning t be thepssibilities master, ev with

•••

some space.

42

38 h4 Qa4 39 Re8

The preliminar preliminaryy 42 42 . . . Rx Rxgg3  des nt change matters.

Many threats crop up. The main onee  mate on mate in 3 mve mvess after Qxh6+. 39

•••

Qd l + 40 Kh Kh22

•• ••• •

Qxd4

43 d7! Qd5+ 44 Kh2 Rxg3 5 Kxg3 Qxf5

Black has wn the queen a bth bishps, but this prves t  insuicient t withstand hite passed pawn gain the incnspi cuus pawn plays a decisive rle!

46 d8(Q) Kh7 47 Qc7+

40

•• ••• •

Rxg2+!

An excellent cmbinatinal chance, nt quite crwned with success. Everything is ready fr Black's combinati combinatin: n: the weak weaknes nesss

White has already suered a great deal frm the clever cunte blws f the ppnent, and pla "safely. It was pssible t take th knight: 47 Rxg8 Qe5+ 48 g Qe4+ 49 Kh2! Qxh4+ 50 Kg,  49 . . . Q Q4 + 50 Kg  Q Qcc  + 5  g g r 49 ... Qe5+ 50 Rg3. 47 Kh8 48 Qd8 Kh Kh77 49 Qc7+ Qc7 + Kh8 Kh 8 50 Q Qe7 e7 Qd3 Qd3 + 5  Kg Kg22 Q Q  52 Qxh7+ Kxh7 53 Rc8 Bac •••

of the g2 square and the psit ps itin in f the sacricing rk, but there are insuicient reserves t cmplete the attack. In addition to this, the White Whi te pawn n d6 turns tu rns out to be a real, dangerous combinational motive.

resigned

In this same turnament, in t last rund game, m ske Teichmann, Black resigned in a psition where he was convinced that he culd nt prevent the winning cmbinatin by Lasker of a rook sacrifice n g7.

41 Kxg2 Rg7+ 42 Qg3!

ee diaam ofnext ge the Black has a t queen defending

were notto for queenion, sa-, crifIficeit in crifice reply the this combination combinat White wuld have lost the game. Nevertheless the possibility of White's queen sacrifice should be considered a natural phenomenon. Interesting is Emanuel Lasker's sta

g7 square (besides the king) an consequently suitable condition do not not exi e xist st fo for a combin com binat ation ion with wi th a rook sacrifice on g7. White endeavours to drive the 36

 

Chess Mlegame Mlegame Com Combatio bations  ns 

has to take into account very many andd various consid an consider eration ationss  it isis

queen away away from from th thee criti cr itical cal po point int.. If Black Black now plays plays 2 2 . . . Qf6, the thenn follows ollows 28 QxdS + Qf7 29 Rxg7 + ! Kxg7 30 30 Rg Rg  + Kh8 3 1 BeS + Bf6 3 2 Bxf Bxf66 + Qxf6 Qxf6 3 3 QhS + and and mate on the next move. Teichmann played 2 7 Qe6 but resigned immediately without waiting for Lasker to carry out the cmbination: 28 Rxg7 + Kxg7 29 Rg + Kh8 30 QhS+ and Qxh6 mate. Thee combinationa Th combi nationall moment proved to be very instructive in the 

MahaU  Kupchik, game played in theMahaU tournament at Chicago in 1926. Marshall did not secure a

possible to list tens of them. bably, White's position shouldProbe somewhat preferred and not because of the weakness of the g6 square, which, however, can also, uon certain conditions, play its ownn role ow role,, but mainly ma inly because of of the cfile where White might organise pressure on the c6 pawn. White has also made some progress in the territorial respect. It i interesting interesti ng that the shar sharpp combinationa sight of Marshall was attracted to two combinational motives. The undefended state of the queen and the weakness of the g7 square, which is defended only by the king. Probably these two moments played no little role in Marshall's choice of continuation. 23 Nf4!

A craf crafty ty move move, , the th eofai aim m which , apparently, consists theoftransfer Qc2 and in the organisation after

that of systematic pressure on the c6 pawn. However, the cunning of the move lies in the fact that, at the same time, it conceals a combinational idea, constructed on the abovementioned combinational mtives.

tangible advantage until the 22nd move, as we see by the following doubleedged and tense position.

23



cS?

Generally a pardonable oversight.speaking, Black is anxious, as it were, not to be late with this move. White threatens to play b4 and Qc2. Neverteless, Blac should first first move away the queen to d 7 , and then already already set about

In evaluating the position, one 137  

Chess Mle Mlegame game Com Combination binations  s 

solving the strategical questions.

24 Rxg7!

Kupchik, probably, was shocked by this surprising revelation. It turns out that taking the rook is goo oodd for White: 2 4 . . . Kxg7 25 Qg3 + and wherever the king moves or if it is covered against the check, White wins the queen by a knight check. After the loss of the g7 pawn, Black cannot resist for long. 24

 

Qd8 25 Rg3

the e6 and g6 squares compels Black to give up a great part of the energy of his pieces to their defence. Meanwhile, White has available also a concrete plan of a combinational combina tional attack, attack , consisti consisting ng of the further wrecking of the Black king's position by the advance of the hpawn, the opening of the gfile and including the roos on this line in the attac. It is difficult fr Blac to counteract this plan 36 Q4 

Rg6simple looks more eenerg nergeti eticc , but also25 the retreat, chosen by Marshall, is good enough.

oncce 36 h5 , then on then 36 . . . g5  36I f Rab 

On 36 . . . Qe7 , so as, oonn 3 7 h5 ,

to still rep reply ly 3 7 . . . g5 , pos ossibl siblee alalready is the combination: 37 Nxg6 fxg6 38 Rxe6.

25 cxd4 26 Ng6+ Bxg6 27 g6 Rxe3 28 Rexe3 dxe3 29 g7 + Kg8 3 0 Q5 Back rres es igned Aekhine (White), in the tour

37 h5 gxh5 38 Khl R7 39 Rgl

Everything has been prepared fo the sacifice of the ro

nament at Kecskemet 927, was awarded a special prize for beauty for a rook sacrifice on g7 in his

39 Qe7 40 Rxg7+! Kxg7 4 1 Rgl + Kh7 42 Nx! Bac 

resigned since on Q or Bxf7 follows Bd3+

game In the the diagramagainst is the Astaos position after 35th move. Black's king's position is shaky, and, though the sacrifice of the knight on g6 is not a threat at the moment,, the moment the potential potenti al weakness weakness of of

The two concluding examples, we present in the form of whole games played in oiet competitions, one of these being from 38

 

Chess Mle Mlegame game Comb Combinatio inations  ns 

960. These bear witness to the fact that the theme "Rxg7 is stil st illl

on f6.

far from exhausted.

On 7situation, ... Nxc3,would White, the present takein with the bishop.

imzich Defence

White: A.Toush Black: A.okosky  8th USSR Cham Champi pion onshi ship p (Moscow 950)

 d4 e6 2 4 4 N 3 N3 Bb4 4 e3 00 5 Bd3 d5 6 Nf3 5 7 00 x xd4 d4 8 exd4 dx4 9 Bx4 N6

Black transfers the game to the channels of the Queen's Gambit Accepted, but with the ishop on b4 and not no t e 7 . ince i nce he retreats the bishop to e7 on the next moe, it turns out that he has lost a tempo.

6 Bd R8 7 Radl N6

8 Bl Nxc3

This exchange would hae been acceptable for Blac f, on the following moe, he had also exchanged on e5. Black would also maintain a good position afte afterr  8 . . . Bf6 (suggested by A.Tolush).  9 bx bxc3 c3 b5 2 0 Rd3 Rd3 Qd5 Qd5

Also now 20 ... Nxe5 2 dxe5 Qb6 would gie gi e B Blac lac a sati satisf sfactory actory game. 2  Ng4 Ng4 Rfd8 Rfd8 22 Rg3 ?

This leads to an exchange of the whitesquared bishops, which is ourable for Black, who obtains the possibil possib ility ity of a more rmly con-

Black does not notice the sacrifice crif ice of the rook on g7 . If White did not hae this possibility, his centre would be quickly smashed. Of cour course se,, Blac should should play 2222 . . .

solidatedofd5thissquare. Asaairs, a consequence state of the isolated White pawn is weakened.

g6, but already aft after er 23 obtains Nh6+ Nh 6+ Kg7 24 Rh3 Rh3 , White an attac.

 0 Bg5 Be Be77 1  Qd3

23 Nh6+ K

It would probably be useful to first of al alll pl play ay 1 1 a3 , not only only to secure the bishop, in case of need, a retreat on a2, but also preparing b4 and closing down the b4 square agai ag ains nstt the mano manoeu eure re . . . Nb4d5 . Also wort worthh consid consideri ering ng is 1 1 Re  , increasing pressure on the e5 and e6   squares. ... Na Na55 12 Bb5 Bd7 3 Ne Ne55 Bxb5 14 Qxb5 a6 15 Qe2 Nd5 24 Rxg7

Not good Not good is  5 . . . Qxd4 Qxd4 16 Rad  Qa7 1 7 Nd7 , and and White White obta obtains ins an attack by exposing the position of the Black king with an exchange

The position of the ing is wrecked and it comes under a mating attack, where Blac's pieces are 39

 

Chess Mdle Mdlegame game Com Combati bations  ons 

bunched in the centre and on the queen's ank and unable to give it speedy assistance. 2 4 Kxg7 25 Qg4+ Bg5 The best bes t chance in the search sear ch fo for chances chan ces of resistance. resistance. On 25 . . . Kf6 could follow 26 Qf4+ Kg7 27 Qg33 + Kf6 2 8 Ng4 + Kg7 29 Ne5 + Qg with a quick mate. •••

26 c4

Also the simple simple 26 2 6 Bxg5 leads to a quick victory. 26 Qxd4 27 Qxg5 + K 2 •••

Be3

This upsets the logical course of the combination, and Black surprisingly begins to put up resistance. Black would have had to capitulate after 28 Qg8+ Ke7 29 Qxf7 Qx f7+ + Kd6 30 Bf Bf4 + Ne5 3 1 Ng N g4 Rf8 32 Bxe5+ Qxe5 33 Rd +. 2  Qh Qh  229 9 Bc5 + Ke 30 3 0 Ng Ng4 4 •••

h4 Qal + 39 Kh  40 Nf4 Threatening Qf8 mate. If  . . .

Kg7, th en 4 1 Qe Qe77 + Nf7 Nf7 4 2 Nxe6+ Nxe6+ or 42 the h5. Back resigned.

The fact that the rook sacrifice on g7 continues to find a place f itself i tournament and match mat ch enencounters, in games between highly rated players, indicates the continuing nu ing underestimation underestim ation of combinational motives which stimulate these combinations. We conclude with the illustrative material of a game between two inteational grandmaters. icilian Defence

White: A.Kotov Black: .Bondarevsky USSR Team Championship (Moscow 1960)

Kd7 31 Bb6

I d3 c5 c 5 2 g3 g6 3 Bg2 Bg7 4 e4

gives the back the material andWhite maintains initiative which is suicient for a favourable com-

ow we Variation have have the th e clear ou of heNClosed he Varia tion of the thoutline e ici itline cilian lian Defence.

plet ion of the struggle. V. Panov pletion pointed point ed out a more energetic energetic conti conti-nuation 3 1 Qf4 Rc 7 32 Bb6 Rb 7 33 Qxf7 Qx f7 + , and White achieves a material advantage.

4

•••

d6 5 f4 Nf6 6 Nd2 Nd2 0 0 7 N3 N3

Every move has its own idea, its own plan; there is also one in the move Nh3 , for example, exampl e, to support support the advance of the gpawn after N, and yet White's move is artificial. A simpler, and possibly the best, reply to it was ... Ng4.

31 Rb 32 Rdl Rd l + Ke 3333 Bxd Rxd 34 Rxd+ Nxd 35 N+ K •••

•• •

Also Ke7 36! Nd5 + Khopeless d6 37 Qe7 Qe7is+ 35 K e5... 38 Qc5 Qc5 The threat f4+ is deadly, while on 3 8 . . . exd5 follows follows 39 39 Qxd5 + and Black either loses the queen or is mated.

7 N c6  N3 c 4 9 N  cxd3  0 Qxd3 Qx d3 Ng4 Ng4 I I 0 0 Qc7

Undoubtedly, Black thought abou ab outt th thee move move 1 1 . . . Qb6, but but f some reason rejected it. Wrongly, it se seem emss to us. Possible sible was was  1 . . . Qb66 1 2 c3 f5 Qb f5  the the gam gamee is shar sharp,

36 Qc Qc55 + Kg7 37 N Nh5 h5 + Kh6 Kh6 3

140  

Ches Mle Mlegame game Com Combinati binations  ons 

but also not without prospects for Black. 2 c3 Rb 3 Ndl bS 4 h3 Nf6 I S Ne Ne33   6 Bd2 R Rd d  7 N Nd4 d4

A very unpleasant move for Black. Both Nxb5 and Nxc6 are threatened. Black decides to go in fr a type of position in which White has a strong piece base on d4, but Black also has his chances. 7 dS  Nxc6 Qxc6 9 eS Nd77 20 Nc2 NcS 2 1 Nd4 Qb6 Nd 22 Qe3 Bb7 23 Be B e  Ne4 Ne 4 24 g4 fS 2S gxfS gxfS 

Carele Care less ssne ness, ss, but 2 5 . . . exf5 would not be in the spirit of the game at all.

2 9 Rxg 7 + !

29 Bh4 would would not be so so decis decisive ive.. After 29 ... Rb7 Rb7 Black could still defend himself. 29 Kx Kxg7 g7 30 Bh4 K 3  Qe2 Rg 32 QhS + 

The attack develops "by itsel'. 32



Rg6

If 3 2 . . . K Kff , the then 33 33 Qh6 Qh6 + Ke 34 Qxh7 33 Rgl K 34 Rxg6 hxg6 3S Qh+ K 36 Bf6 QcS

Or 36 ... Rb7 37 Qg7+ Ke 3 Qg+ Kd7 39 Qf7 mate.

3 7 7 + Ke 3 Qxg6+ g6 + K 3 9  Back resigned.  resigned. 

He should take measures to de-

Afterr 39 . . . Qc7 40 Qh6+ Afte Qh6 + Black is mated. The picture portrayed and conditioned by the combination with the rook sacrifice on g7 is absolutely clear. In the illustrative examples even its details are clearly clearly

fend 26 . . . the Rd 7g7or orsquare, 26 . . . Bfor c  aexample nd t h e n by ... Rb7.

reected intion the isnotes. The why a situa s ituation suitable su itable for forreason carrycarrying out a sacrifice, the process of

26 Kh2

Hoping to transfer the rook to the gile. 26



Re

prepar ation for the sacrifice and the preparation attack after the sacriice, already amounts to a deinite pattern of operation which soon allows us to place this sacriice on a theoretical foundation. I t remains rema ins fo for us to t o further further note the following. One might think that the process process of sacricing sacri cing a rook rook on g7 does not require strenuous eor e ort,t, if the rooks j ust go on to the gile and if the g7 square is only defended by the king. We want to take the opportunity to wa against such a casual approach to

27 Rg l

Black is too Black too late. On 2 7 . . . Re 7 fol ollows lows Bxe4, Bxe4 , followed ol lowed by Bh4f6 Bh4f6 . 27



Bc  2 Bx Bxe4 e4 dxe dxe4 4

141  

Chesss Mle Ches Mlegame game Combina Combinations  tions 

any sacrifice, including also the rook sacrifice sacrifice on g 7. Even the theoretical combination with the sacrifice of the bishop b ishop on h 7 requires requ ires clear calculation, and practice knows quite a few cases where the sacrifice of a bishop proves to be incorrect, despite the bad position of the king and the presence of reserve forces for the attack. Everything that has been said must relate even more to the sacrificee of the rook on g7. crific g 7. The fina finall variations completing the attack must be calculated concretely and accurately (of course, within the bounds of possibility). In the process of preparation, i.e. the presacrifice play, one should take into account, when transfering the

rooks ttoo the g rooks gle le,, the useful usefulness ness of of such a transfer not just for the sacrifice, but its purposefulness in the oerall positional planning. When the opponent, with a view to defending against a sacrifice, is forced to make moves which worsen worsen his position position in other sectors of of the struggle, struggle, then, it goes goes withut saying, one should bear this in mind when attacking the g7 point with the rook. One should not forget that not only the combination itself is dangerous, but also the threat to carry it out. Both one and the other serve as good guarantees in the matter of struggle for the initiative or in the development of the initiative.

142  

Chapte Chap terr El Eleven even Harony of Rooks Harony Rooks and Bish Bishop ops. s. The Th e Them Theme e of Lock Locked ed"i "in n Pi Piece eces. s. When th question is about the harmonious har monious operation of rooks and bishops, then we have in mind, mainly, the mating which are characteristic forthemes the attack of rooks and bishops on the opponent's king's positi position. on. At least half a dozen thematic mates can be portrayed in combinations of this type. We illustrate these schemes in the diagrams:

143  

Chesss Mdleg Ches Mdlegame ame Comba Combations  tions 

example, in Chapter 5, the finale of the game game,, KolischLoy Kolisch Loydd ( scheme scheme 3), or, in Chapter 6, the game, TorreLasker, in which White carried out a combination, dubbed "the mill (scheme 5). This is a very striking illustration of the combinational harmony of roo and bishop. The concluding part of the game Chon Beste ( 3 rd All Al lRussian Russian touament, touament, Kie 1903) represents an interesting example. Already in the opening, Black (Bernstein) got into a diicult positi pos ition on and was forced forced to giv up the queen for roo and bishop. However, later Chigorin did not play in the best way and not bad chances arose for Black. After White's 26th move, the following position was reached 

We omit two or three themes. The task does not consis consistt of of listin li stingg all possible varieties of mates of bishop and rook, therefore it remains to give mainly the themes which are most common in chess practice. In other words we stick to the true slogan: "Closer to ife! Above,, we have already encounAbove encountered several of the given themes in in the pages of this book. ee, for

The continuation was: 26 ... c5!

Beautiful! On 27 Nxd8 follows ... Bd4+. 2 7 Qe7

White maintains good chances, not only of a draw, by playing 2 Qxh7. 2 7 . .. Bx Bxd4+ d4+ 28 K Kffl

144  

Chess Mdlegam Mdlegamee Com Combati bations  ons 

Aso this move is not good. Better Bet ter is Kh 1 . 28

•••

Rh8 29 Qxg5 Be5 30 h3

This ast move before the timecontro acceerates his downfa, whi ch wa s aso inevitab inevi tabee afte afterr 30 30 Nxc5 Rf+ 31 Ke2 Re. 3 0 Re8! Re 8! 3 1 Nf4 Bxf Bxf4 4 3322 Qx Qxd5 d5 Bg3 and White resigned. •••

In the game Duras  and (Carsbad 1907), White overooked hea coud mate have in three which givenmoves if he had more deepy deepy estima es timated ted the harmonious interaction of rooks and bishops. This happened in the fofolowing position.

Back resigned.

owever, in the diagram position, there is a quicker and more eective decisive combination, which forces mate in three moves: 25 B+ Bh5 26 Qxh5+! gxh5 2 7 Rh6 Rh6 mat mate. e.

It is interesting to note that this is not an isoated iso ated case of "overlook"overlooking such a mate. In the touament at verdovsk 1943, in the Boesavsky  Botvinnik, bya game similar Boesavsky mate was overlooked both partners. As a result of an extraordinarily sharp and tense strugge, from the opening itsef, after White's 5th move the game reached the following extremely unusua and sharp position.

Back is th e excha exchange nge aahe head, ad, but his position is hopeess in view of thee irre th irresist sistibe ibe attack a ttack of of the White W hite pieces on the exposed Back king. Back' Ba ck'ss last last mov movee was was 24 . . . Bg4, in order to save himself from the threatened Bf mate, White repied:

The original and tense tense situation s ituation which developed in this game seems to have tired t ired out both opponents. Black has five pawns for two bishops, but his king finds itsef under attack. Black's chances lie in the fact fact tthat hat his hi s pawns on d2 and and c3 rivet the White White bishop bishop to the d  a4 diago di agonal nal and the rook rook to the dil dile. e. In the game there folowed:

25 Nf4

And after 25 Rh8 26 Nxd5 Qxd6 27 exd6 ex d6 Bh5 2 8 Be3 Ra Rad8 d8 29 2 9 Qg Qg55 •••

145  

Chess Che ss Mlegame Mlegame Combint Combintions  ions 

58  ReI

Black now threatens a continuous attack on the bishops, by manoeuvring along the first rank. 59 Rd6+ Kg7?

This should have led to an immediate media te loss. loss. Corre orrect ct was was 59 . . . Kh7. 6 0 Bx Bxh6+ h6+ Kh7 6  Bg5? Bg5?

One good turn deserves another! One another ! Instead of completing the combination with 61 Bf8, and mate is irresistible irr esistible  White step stepss ba back ck with hiss bishop and misses hi m isses the chance to exploit the ideal harmony in the action of rooks and bishops. 6    Rb 62 B B2 R Rcc  63 Bx Bxf5 + Kg77 64 Rd7 + Kf8 Kg Kf8 65 Bx Bxd2 d2 xd2 66 Rxd2 b3 and the gme ended in a draw

on the 89th move. Mieses (Black) conducted the attack with rooks and bishops in

beautiful style position against Uand in the following from the

tio n, But, tion, But , furthermo furthermore, re, Black holds a convincing initiative, the main object of which is the tattered surroundings of the White king. In order or der to clear the atmosphe atmosphere, re, White is prepared to also give up the exchange, since, on 18 Re, could follow if only 18 ... Be4, without even mentioning 18 ... Rhe8 Rh e8 with the the thre threat at . . . Bb Bb55 c c6. 6. Events developed like this: 18 Qc Bb6 9 Qg5 Bxfl 20 Rxfl Nd3 Nd3 ! 2  Qxg7 h5 h5 ! 2222 Qx Qx h4 23 gxh4

Of course he cannot allow the advance of the pawn to h3. 23    Nf2 + 24 Rxf Rxf22

Othe Ot herw rwis isee  mate! mate!

24  Bxf2 25 h5 Rhg8

Now Black's two rooks and bishops operate together together like l ike clock work. 26 Qe6+ Kb8 27 h4 B5

of 28 ... RdWith 1 + 29the Kh Kh2plain 2 Bd6 Bd6 threat +.

Carlsbad tournament 1907.

2 8 f4

Black announced mate in five moves by eans of the following combination 28  Rdl + 29 Kh2

Black has three minor mino r pieces and a pawn for the queen, which, even from a purely material point of vi view, ew, obliges obl iges one to prefer prefer his posi posi 

Bg I + 30 Khl Be3 + 3  K Kh h2 Bxf4+ 32 Kh3 Rh mate

146  

Chess Mle Mlegame game Combinat Combinations  ions 

An incredible case of more than once disregarding a mate with rook and bishop occurred in the game, totz Pinik (Inteational tournament in tokholm 1952). Black had conducted the attack excellently and, af afte terr 30 Kh4, Kh4 , toltz was already prepared to reconcile himself to the inevitable. The position looked like this:

Black had to make his 36th move. It is quite clear that the attenti te ntion ongrandmaste of of the par partne rs  not intern internaational grandmasters rstners  did focus

mate in three moves by means of the simple combination 41 ... Rh3+ 42 Kf4 R+ and ... Qe5 We think that such istakes happen not because of time trouble (or because of smoke in the playinghall!), but because there are even grandmasters who underestimate the specifi sp ecificc gravity gravi ty of combinat combi nations ions in the creative process of the chess struggle. Italian In one Game, of the well variations known to of the majority major ity of chessp layers , and folol lowing the game Knorre Knorre Chigorin, the strength of the harmony of bishops and rooks is demonstrated demons trated in very ve ry expressive expressive fashion. The variation develops inthis way. I e4 e5 2 NO Nc6 3 Bc4 Bc5 4 d3 d6 5 00 Nf6  5 . . . Bg Bg44 , White should should reply reply 6 c3.

on the mate by Rh3, which is prevented by the White queen on c3. Thee idea of the mate simply Th si mply juts j uts out from all positions. Nevertheless, instead of 36 ... Qc4+ 37 Qxc4 Rh33 mate, Rh mate, or 36 . . . Qc4+ 37 Rg4 Rg4 Rxc3 38 Rxc4 Rh3 mate, Pilnik played:

6 Bg5 h6 7 Bh4 Bh4

Best here is 7 Be3 or 7 Bxf6 7

•••

g5 8 Bg3 h5!

Th is bol This boldd attack at once once transfers transfers thee game to the channels th chan nels of combicomb inational ideas. Also good fr Black is 8 ... Bg4. 9 Nxg5

Te right reaction here to the storm is Dubois' move 9 h4.

36 Re4+ 37 Kg3 Re3+ 38 Kh4 Re4+ •• •

till not noticing what is staring him in the face.

9 h4! 0 Nx Nx hxg hxg33 I I Nxd8 Nxd8 Bg4 2 Qd2 Nd4! •••

This move contains irresistible combinational threats, in which is concealed the thematic mate of bishop and rook, and rook and

39 Kg3 Rg4+ 40 Kh Rh4+ 4 Kg3

Timetrouble is over and Black agreed a draw, instead of giving 1 47  

Chess Mdle Mdlegame game Co Combiatio mbiations  ns 

knight and others.

With the threat of mate . Rh6+ and ... B£+. 3 3 Bxe Bxe4

Useess is 33 Kg Useess Kg  , Bf2 + and mate with the rook on h6. White probably thought, by taking the knight, that at least he would rid hi mself of mate mate . 33

000

B!

A very beautiful conclusion with two thematic mates at once Rh6 mate or after 34 g3 Be4, 1 3 N N  3 Nf3 +  4 ggx xf3 Bx Bxff3

And White is lost as he has no defence against the main theme  mate of the rook on h, after 15 hxg33 or 1 5 h3 hxg h 3 Rxh3 Rxh3 . Also mate mate by by 15 ... gxh2 is threatened. With a small, but original and elegant combination, combination, Capabana (Black) finished his game with Nim%ovich in the inteational tou to uame at an an e eba basti stian an 1 9it 1 1is. In ament the ntdiagram position

Next the elegant conclusion of White's attack i the game Dus piemann (International tournament in Pistyan 1912). 1912 ). The diagram position is after Black's 44th 44 th move move . . . Qd6. 

Black's 32nd move. Though Black has a clear advantage, the denouement followed sooner than might have been expected.

32

00 000 0

Black pins the rook, parrying the main threat of Re8 mate. The sharpness sh arpness of the created situa si tuatio tionn is characterised not only by the dangerous position of the Black king, but also the completely exposed position of the White king, which allows Black to create various counterthreats. Thus, for example, White  not able to unpin the rook by the natural moves

R

148  

Chesss Mdl Ches Mdlegam egamee Com Comba batio tions  ns 

45 Qf Qf4 or 45 Kh K h  . In both cases he is mated mated after 45 45 . . . Qxh6 Qxh6 + . On the other hand, White can continue the attack ony by unpinning the rook, since there is no time for him to busy himsef with preparatory manoeuvres. Back threatens to pay ... Kg8 and ... Bf, which eads to him seizing the initiative. The soution to the question is a combination whic which, h, as itit tus out, out , was foreseen by Duras earier. 45Th Qg3!! Ther eree isQxh6+ nothin nothingg ese. On 45 . . .

Rxg3 woud obviousy foow 46 Rxe8 mate. 46 Qh3 Qd6

Aso after the exchange of queens, Back woud ose the bishop at east. 47 Kh l ! Kg 4 Rx Rxe+ e+ K 49 Rh Back resigned.

of thi thiss whoe variation vari ation of the the King's Indian Defence. 9 Bd3 Ng4 0 NJ This  forced, though undoubt-

edy White had previousy panne pannedd to deveop the knight on e2. However, thanks to the fact that White's king kin g is detained in the centre, aready combinationa couds begin to gather. Here, for example, is one of the possibiities pointed out by Boesa Boesavsky vsky:: 10 000 000 f5 1 1 exf55 Nb4 exf Nnumerous b4 1 2 Be Be44 Rxf R xf55 1 3 Bxf Bxf5 Bxf5 Bxf5 with threats. If, 5 however, 1 0 Nge2, Nge2, t h e n 10 1 0 . . . Nc Ncee5 1 1 000 Nxh2 1 2 Kxh 0 K xh22 Qh Qh4 + 1 3 K Kg g Ng4 14 Qf4 Be5. 10 Nge5   Be Be2 Nxf3 + 1 2 Bxf3 Nd4 13 Bdl  

White patienty fals fals back back , waitwait in his hi s tu t u fo for when wh en hhee wi w i fina finay y set foot on the d5 square. 13

furtherationa two games iustrate theAcombinatio combin na consequences conseque nces of



f5 4 exf5

He must notfpawn. aow the further advance of the

a harmonious harmo nious operation of rook and bishop.

14 Bxf5 15 Ne2 Nxe2 16 Bxe2 Bxb2 7 Qxb2 Qg5 

The introduction to the creation of a harmonious attack on the White king, with the joint operation of the bishop and rook. The further course of events is quite a bi t reminiscent remini scent of of ack's attack in the game, Maroczyarsha (see Chapter 10).

King's ndian Defence

White: V.Aatortsev Back: .Boesavsky (18th USSR Championship 1950)

1 d4 N 2 c4 d6 3 Nc3 e5 4 e4 exd4 5 Qxd4 Nc6 6 Qd2 g6 7 b3 Bg77  Bb2 0  0 Bg

White ags behind in deveopment and does not succeed in expoiting expo iting the d5 square ffoor his piep iecess  in the firs ce firstt pac pacee the knig knight, ht, and this paces under doubt the corectness, cor ectness , from from his point of view vi ew,,

  g3 Rae Rae

Forcing White to caste on the king's side, where his king wi find no peace. Back now threatens the moves ... Bg4 or ... Bd3. 1 9 0 0 Bh BhJJ 20 f4

149  

Chess Mle Mlegame game Combi Combintions  ntions 

On a move of the rook would follow a combin combinati ation on with . . . R2 R2 . For eample: 20 Rfc Rf2! 21 Kf2 Qe3+ 22 Ke Qg + 23 Kd2 Re2 R e2 + 24 Ke2 Ke2 Qh2 + and and . . . Qb2.

n this game, Black's bishop and rook solved the problem of harmony in the best way. English Opening

White: .akharov Black: .Levitsky 29th Ukraine Championship (Kiev 960)

 c4 N 2 Nc3 d5 3 cxd5 Nxd5 4 g3 g6

t is possible , imitating im itating the oppo-

20 ... x  xf ! !

The harmonious harm onious play of the rook and bishop in the net stage of the attack revals fully the essence of the combinational idea, with even a queen sacrifice. 2 1 g5 Rxe2 Rxe2 22 Qc3 Qc3 g g22 23 Qd3

nent,way, to develop forceshave alsofelt in this but Blackhiswould more conident in the opening by cont co nti iui uinng cl clas assi sica callllyy  . . . cS or even ev en . . . e5 . On th thee other other hand, hand, one cannot approve appr ove of the natural 4 . . . b6 he here, re, in view of 5 Bg2 Bg2 Bb7 6 Qa44 + , and Qa and Black must make make th thee clumsy move 6 . . . Bc6. Bc6. 5 g2 Nxc3

This echange is poor for many reaso reasons and, and, in general gener al,, diicu di lt to give ns a reason for. Did heicult really

make it only to remove the attacked knight with wi th tempo tempo ? Any retreat of the knight, without even mentioning the mo move ve 5 . . . c6, might mi ght have become a us usef eful ul link lin k in Blak's opening plan of development.

On 23 Re 1 would have fol fol lowed 23 ... Bh3. 23 ...  24 Rf

Terrible unpleasantness is threatened ten ed af after . . . Rg2 + , but ther theree is no defence. 24 ... Rg2+ 25 Khl c6!

Obtaining the "mill formation with the rook threatening threatening to jump j ump away. This is deadly. 2 6  + Kx The echange of rooks does not improve White's position. To save thee king th king  he has has to to give give up the the queen. 27 Qf Rf2 + White resigned.

6 bxc3 g7 7 h4

Before the mobilisation of forces, such an impetuous attack on the flank cannot be recommended. Above all and most of all it weakens his own own posi positio tion. n. This kind of pawn "shot testiies testiies more to daring than a serious plan of play. t should at the same time be noted 150

 

Chesss Mdlegam Ches Mdlegamee Co Combinations  mbinations 

that the combinational tension, upon such a rather lighthearted attitude to the future, sometimes increases at a very quick rate. A normal plan for White would be a concentration of pressure on the bf bfile ile (Qb3 , Rb 1 ) , plus plus a firm firm pawn outpost ou tpost on on d4 with the development of the knight on e2. ust such a plan would have forced Black Bla ck to regret the exchange on c3 . 7

•••

00

O course, Black has nothing to fear.

8 h5 Qd6

Black has many good plans. Possibly this is not bad, though an early development of the queen is usually usual ly associated associated with wi th some some inconvenien veni ence. ce. Good Good was 8 . . . Nc6, and then . . . Bf5 or . . . Bg4. 9 hx hxg6 hx hxg6 1 0 Rb  Rd8 1 1 Qc2 c5

Black should hurry with his

. . . Qd5. Wort Worthh cons conside iderin ringg is  9 B . The plan of of attack, pursued by by White, is ery clever and ought to have led to victory. 19 ... c4! 20 Bh6

The tension has reached its height heig ht  it is clear clear that that a crisis crisis is looming, which must break out into a combina combination. tion. On 20 . . . Bh Bh88 would have probably followed 21 Bf8 wth the threat of Rxh8+. White's attack can hardly be parrie ried. ex ple, Bfh6 the Bh3d. Bh 3 orFor 2 1 exam . . ample, . Be Be5 5 222 B1 e.7. .with wit th22e threat g4, and also Qh6. 20 ... cxd3

development, by continuing now . . . N d7 or or . . . Nc6. Nc 6. 12 Nf3 Nc6 13 Ng5 b6 14 Qb3 e6 15 Ne4 Qe5 16 d3

21 Bxg7

A move which, though linked to a beautifu beaut ifull combi combinati national onal idea idea with a mating theme conditioned by the harmonious operation of the rooks and bishops, is nevertheless mistaken and justifies itself only after a mistaken reply by the opponent. The correct and, apparently, decisive continuation of the attack was 2  exd3 exd3 Rxd3 Rxd3 22 Bxg7 Bxe4 Bxe4 23 Qh6 f6, and now now not 24 Qh7 + K and White does not achieve much, butt 24 Bf8 bu Bf8   This quiet move move leads leads

The try 16 Nxc5 Qxc5 17 Ba3 Qg5 1 8 Bxc6 Qxd2 + would end end in Black's favour. 16 ... Na5 17 Qc2 Bb7 18 Bf4 5

Despite the fact that Black has played in i n far from the best way , he has not bad counterchances, mainly because the position of White's king leaves much to be desired. 19 Qcl

On 1 9 Bh3 Bh3 , Black Black would reply reply  9 15  

Chess Mlegame Mlegame C Comba ombatns  tns 

to mate, since on the only defence agai ag ains nstt the thre threat at on g7  24 . . . Rd7, follows mate in three moves by 25 Qh8 + etc. 2 1 . . . d2 + ?

Losing the game. Losing game. H e should play 2 1 . . . Bxe4 Bxe4 an and there there is no not the the move mo ve 22 Qh6 Qh6 in vi view ew of . . . d2 + . If If,, how ho wever, now 2 2 exd3 exd3 , then 22 . . . Bxg2 23 Qh6 f6, and, after 24 Qh7+ K, White cannot do anything against the Black king. The move is 5now simp si mple le Bf8 . . . Qe5 Qe + . refuted by the 22 Qxd2!

Black had reckoned only on 22 Nxd2. 22

•••

Rxd2 23 Bf6!

pin or double attack, but but about the attack on a piece which cannot retreat, ei either ther because because all squares squares of retreat are are occupied by its i ts own own piepie ces or pawns or because some squares of retreat find themselves thems elves under attack by pawns or pieces of the opponent. Here is a schematic picture of such themes. themes.

23 Qxf6 24 Nx+ Kg7 25 Bxb7 Rad8 26 Ne4 •••

And White is a piece up. Back resigned.

To conclude this chapter we want to touch upon one small but original combinational theme. Figuratively speaking, this theme could be called "mate of a piece. The question here is not about the catching of a piece by means of a 52  

Chess Che ss Md Mdleg legame ame Com Comb bat atns  ns 

It shoud be mentioned that a simiar sim iar combinationa combinationa theme is encountered aso in severa other variations (panish Game) as for exampe the foowing: 1 e4 e5 2 NO NO Nc6 Nc6 3 Bb Bb55 a6 a6 4 Ba4 Nf6 5 d4 exd4 6 e5 Ne4 7 Nxd4 Nxf2! 8 Kxf2 Qh4+ 9 Ke33 Q Ke Qx xd4+  0 Qxd4 Nxd4 xd4   Kxd4 b5 b5  2 Bb3 Bb3 c5 +

And Back locking in the bishop wins back the piece

We begin with a itte opening exampe. In the panish Game we known is the variation into which sometimes fa inexpe-

remaining with the better game. In the inteationa touament at an an eb ebas asti tian an 1 9 1 1 , in the the game game Nimzovich Leonhardt, occurred Nimzovich a curious case of cooperative ockingin of the Back queen. Afte Af terr Back's Back's 26th mov move . . . Qc6 Qc6 this game reached the following position.

rienced chess amateurs:  e4 e5 2

Nf3 Nc6 Nc6 3 Bb5 a6 4 Ba4 d6 5 d4 b5 6 Bb3 Nxd4 7 Nxd4 exd4 8 Qxd4 (He should play 8 Bd5) 8 c5 9 Qd5 Be6 0 Qc6 + Bd7   Qd5 c4 and the White bishop is 

ocked in.

Pondering the opponent's pan N imzovich imzo vich came to the concusion concus ion and as it tus out a correct one that Back wants nothing more than to penetrate with the queen on d4. Taking into account that the position has assumed a ocked character and that it is therefore 153  

Chess Mdleg Mdlegame ame Com Combatio bations  ns 

going nowhere fast, he decides, in any case, to concoct a trap for the Black queen on the d4 square. Events develop quickly.

Qc2 c4 34 Qf5 Qxf5 35 gxf5 R 36 Rg4 b5 37 a4   Rgl and Back soon resigned.

The aim The a im of this th is move mo ve is i s to defend defend the  pawn: for the cncoction of the trap, this has important signiicance.

In 1914, at the inteational grandmaster touament at Petersburg, the game Aekhine Aekhine Backbue developed in the following way. way .

27

 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nc6 3 Bb5 Nd4

27 Rlg2



Qd6

Heading for its downfall. 28 Qc

move White the. d4 With squarethis under strict l ockkeeps lock and key. key 28



Qd4?

traight into the trap! The astute Nimzovich should be given hiss due. Leonhardt hi Leonhardt probably prob ably consi consi-dered de red that th at,, though though the invasion on d4 is not dangerous for White, he would take the opportunity "to make some noise.

Blackburne repeatedly employed this active defence in the Petersburg steadfastlyoflinking ittouament, to the development the king's bishop on g7. 4 Nxd4 Nxd4 exd4 exd4 5 00 g 6 6 d3 B g7 7 f4

Capablanca, in a game against Blackburne, played firstly 7 Nbd2 and only only on on 7 . . . Ne Ne77 8 f4 f4 . 7 c6 8 Bc4 d5 9 exd5 cxd5 1 0 Bb5 + ? K! 

A combinational move, which sharpens the position. The fact of

the matter  that White's bishop on b5 now looks like a hermit and White must be worried about its isolation. In order not to pay the price fo this, simplest simplest was was to to play play 1 1 Ba4. Alsoo pos Als possible sible w waas 1 1 Qe 1 o 1  Re 1 , and and inally inally Bd2 and even b4. White Whi te carelessly bypasses bypasses all al l these possibilities.

29 Nd5!

The queen is trapped, all that remains is to sell its life dearly.

  N d2 ?

Afte this mistake, the bishop gets locked in and perishes.

29 Rxd5 30 c3 Qxd3 3 exd5!  

ee diagm op ne page

Afterr 3 1 Rxd3 Afte Rxd3 Rxd3 , the the advantage would pass to Black. 3







Qa5  2 a4 a4 a6  3 Nb3 Q8 Q8

The bishop is trapped, Whites taskk  is to obtain something fo it. tas

Qxc4 32 dxe6 Qxe6 33

154  

Chess Mle Mlegame game C Combinati ombinations  ons 

There followed: 8 e5 Nh5

4 Bd2 axb5 15 axb5 Rxal 6 Bb4+ Ne7 7 Qxal Bf6 8 Qa7 b6Threatening 9 Re Nxd4.  9  Be6 20 20 Kh l h5? 2  Bx Bxe7 e7 + Qxe7 22 Qxb6 Qb4 23 Q5 + Qx5 24 Nx5 Bd8 25 Nxe6+ e6 26 Rxe6  27 Rd6 Be7 28 Rxd5 R8 29 4 dx3 30 bxc3 Rxc3

Despite the fact that Blacks chances are still preferable, White succeeded in achieving the

Black probably supposed that the knight would be relatively safe here. On 19 g4, Black has the reply . . . Bb 7 with the the threa threatt of of . . . Bx andd . . . Qg an Qg55 . On the the othe otherr hand, hand, after 18 ... Ne8, Blacks position would be hopelessly cramped. A very simple method of realisation would consist of 19 Qd8 Qxd8 20 Rxd8 Bb7 21 Rxa8 Bxa8 22 Nd4. Als Also o goo goodd is 19 Qa4  pointe pointedd out by Levensh. 9 g4!

And none the less the knight is won. 9  Bb7 20 Qe3 BxO 2  Qxf3 Qg5 22 h4 4 23 Kg

23 Rc3 leads to the same result, but not 23 Qe2 in view of . . . Ng Ng33 with defensive resources. 23  Qxe5 24 gxh5

a piece a pawn, andWhite and the the initia inihas tiativ tive e  the thefor outcom outcome e of the struggle is clear. In the 6th game of the return match between Aekhine and Euwe, Black (Euwe), apparently shaken by the stormy course of the opening, overlooked a piece sacrifice introducing a simple combination on the theme of a lockedin rook.

exchange of the last Black pawn and on the 45th move the opponents agreed to a draw The following position occurred in the game Levensh LevenshDus Cho timirsky in the Leningrad masters touament 1934

I d4 d5 2 4  4 6 3 Nc Nc33 dx4 dx4 4 e4 e4 e5 5 Bx4 exd4 6 N

This position has already become part of history. Numerous analyses, with which Alekhine himself agreed, proved that Black should accept the knight sacrifice, 55  

Chess Mdleg Mdlegame ame Co Combiati mbiations  ons 

6 . . . dxc3 7 Bxf7 Bxf7 + Ke7 8 Qb3 cxb2 9 Bxb2 Qb6 etc. etc. , in the final analysis favouring Black. Euwe, however, was planning first and foremost to drive the White bishop back to b3, so as to remove this square from from the orbi t of the queen's q ueen's activity. This positionally tactical cnsideration in a tense combinational atmosphere turns out to be totally misplaced. 6

5

•

A move which does not take into account the opponent's strong reply; it was apparently dictated by a desire to develop the bishop on fS, which is hampered by th White queen on b3. Black's task however, in this diicult opening variation is the preparation of th adva ad vanc ncee . . . cS , otherwis otherwisee it will wil l not be easy for Black to justi j usti  the devlopment lopm ent of the b ishop on g7 g 7 . To initiate this plan it  necessary to consolidate achieved achiev ed bythe themove mosquare, ve 7 . .which . e6. is 8 Qa3! e6

He should sho uld return with the queen queen to d8. 9 cxd5 exd5

7 Nx5!

This makes possible the carrying out of a highly original combination, but the capture with the cpawn also does not promise Blac any jo after 0 Re I Nc Nc66   Na Na

Qd8  2 BbS Qd8 BbS B Bd7 d7 3 NcS , and Whi te's position is overwhelming.

o if now 7 . . . cxbS , then then 8 BdS and the lockedin rook on a8 erishes. 7

•• •

0 Na4 Qd8

uspecting nothing.

Ba6 8 Q3.

A very eective, because of its surprise surpr ise and great great originality, combination binat ion on the theme of a lockedin rook, rook, was carried carried out in the game .Freyman-.Rainovich (9th UR Championship, Leningrad 1 93 4 ) . It is app appar aren entt th that at the opening was played strictly classicall classi callyy by both sides and nothing foreshadowed the combinational outburst. Here is how it i t happened happened::

  Nb 6 ! !

1 N N d5 2 d4 N 3 c4 c6 4 e3 g6 5 Nc3 Bg7 Bg 7 6 Q Q3 3 0-0 7 Bd2 Q6

A combination with two themes of lockin lockingin gin  the the roo rookk aand nd th th 56

 

Chess Mdlegame Combations  Combations 

queeen after 1 1 . . . Qxb qu xb66 1 2 Ba5 Ba5 . 1 1 ... aax xb6

He has to!

12 Qxa8 Nbd7 13 Be2 Ne4 14 Rdl

Beginning with this move, White plays indierently and in the end has to be satisfied with a draw. O course, being the exchange ahead, White must win the game and several plans lead to this. One of them: 10 00 Ndf6 Ndf6 1 1 Rf Rfc c 1 , then Be queen's 1 with wi th aank. future futureItpawn pgoes awn attack on the without saying that if Black, on 14 00, excha exchang nges es o n d 2 , i t can can only make White happy. The theme of lockedin pieces occurs virtually throughout the whole process of the following l ively and sharp game. game. As the concluding and most interesting illustration, we present it in full.

This retreat is by no means forced, but, obviously, by resorting to it, Black already has in view his combinational counterattack on the 12th move. No worse, if not better,r, for Black bette Black here here was 8 . . . Bxd4 9 Qxd4 d6 d6 , with wi th the threat to win the bish bishop ( . . . c5) . 9 dxe5

On 9 f4, as is usuall usua llyy pl played ayed in an an analogous variation of the Four Knights Opening, could follow 9 . . . Ng N g6 10 5 c5 c5without or or 10 advanta . . . 0 00tage 11 exd exd6 6 Re8 + , enot advan ge for Black. 9 Bx Bxe5 e5  0 f4 Bxc3 Bxc3 + 1  bxc3 bxc3 0 0 •••

Alekhine indicated that this was for orce cedd since since on on 1 1 . . . N xe4 follows ollows 1 2 Qd5. Meanw Meanwhile hile the posit positio ionn is so sharp and sated with combinations, that it should be looked at in more detail, how the struggle

would turn out in this variation. After 1 2 . . . 00 13 Q Qxa8 xa8 c6 ! 14 Be3 (not good isis 1 4 00 00 Qb6 + 1 5 Kh Kh  Bb7 16 Be Be3 c5) 14 . . . Q h4 + 1 5 Kd Q6! Black ought not lose.

panish Game

White: A.Aekhine Black: R.Reti nteational Touament nteational Touamen t (Vienna 1922)

1 2 e5

1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nc6 3 Bb5 a6 4 Ba4 Nf6 5 Nc3 b5 6 Bb3 Bc5

As a result of this, the course of the struggle is sated with combinational content; content; the storm begins begins to die down only on the 30th move, when the endgame becomes clearly deined. 7 Nxe5

A wellknown opening combination on the th e theme of o f fork. 7

•

2

Nxe5 8 d4 Bd6

••

c5!

157  

Chess Mle Mlegame game Combi Combinations  nations 

A combinational decision decisi on to the proble pr oblem m  begin beginnin ningg play play again against st the lockedin White bishop on b3. Black could also retreat the knight to e8 e8. Aft After 1 2 . . . Ne8 1 3 00 00 Qe 7, despite the cramped position, Black could defend himself, the more so that Whites position is also not without wi thout weakne weaknesses. sses. 3 Ba3 Qa Qa55 ! 4 0  0 Qx Qxa3 a3

This temporary removal of the opponents queen from the central zone the developing tionalofbattle entered intocombinaAlekhines calculation, but none the less he does does not achieve anything decisdeci sive by this. 15 exf6 c4

And so the theme is realised, the bishop is locked in. 16 Qd5 Qa5!

Now, on 1 7 Qxa8, Qxa8, foll folloows . . . Qb66 + and Qb and the thenn . . . Bb7, lockin lockingg in

a successful resistance. 20 Qe5 6 2 Bd3   2 2 Qh5 +

22 Qxf6+ Kxf6 23 Bxh7 would have ha ve been been mistake mistaken. n. Then Then 23 . . . Re2 24 Rg1 Rh8 25 Bd3 Re3 with the irresistible threat of Reh3. From Fr om this thi s varia var iatition on we can can see see what ric possibilities are concealed inthe powerful powerful positi posi tion on of the bishop bi shop on b7. 22

00 0

h6 23 Qg4+ Kh8 24

Qxd7 White wins another pawn and,

besides, "with tempo, since he attacks the bishop. n addition to this, White also threatens the exchange of queens after Qd4. t would seem that the scales scales are ti lting clearly to his side. 2 4 Re7 2 5 Qd4 Qd4 Qxd4 Qxd4 26 cxd4 Rd8 27 £5  28 Rael Rg7 29 Be4 Rxd4 Rxd4 30 Bxb7 Rx Rxb7 b7 3  Re6 00 0

and winning winning the queen queen.. The threat 1 7 Qg5 is also parried parried by means means of the same check on b6.

Kg7 32 Rxa6 Rc4 33 R Rxc2 and the game ended in a draw on

the 60th move. s some sort of generalisation necessary necess ary in i n respect of the theme of lockedin loc kedin pieces pieces ( mat matee of of a piece ! ) , on the basis of the illustrative materiall ? t seems to us it is not necessteria necessary. The theme, you see, is very clear in itself, and the methods of realising it are so simple that we would risk lapsing into unnecessary repetition and detail. It is perhaps only of some use to mention, in respect of the theme of the lockedin rook, that this theme, 80% of the time, appears as an opening theme and the lockedin rook is

17 g7 Qb6+ 8 Khl Kxg7

Here, 18 ... Rd8 is already bad, in view of 19 Bxc4 bxc4 20 Qxa8 Bb7 21 Rab1, and White remains the exchange ahead. 9 B Bxc xc4! 4! Bb7! Bb7 ! O course, not 19 ... bxc4, on

which would follow the variation pointed out in the previous note and so White brings the bishop out of imprisonment and also captures a pawn. Nevertheless this is far from being the whole story. The excellent position of the Black bishop guarantees him resources for 158  

Chesss Md Ches Mdleg legme me Comb Combinat inations  ions 

subject to attack usually on its ori ginal square. Referring to the queen, then it finds it itse self lf in danger mo most st fre fre quen qu entl tlyy on th thee quee ueen's l lan ankk in

those cases when it penetrates deep into in to the the ter territ ritor oryy of th thee ene enemy my for for ces.. Such ces Such a quee queenn inva invasi sion on must must therefor ther eforee be calcu calculated lated particu particularly  larly  accurately and concretely.

159  

Chapter Cha pter Tw Twel elve ve Methods Metho ds of Inte Interc rcep epo on n and and Vari Va riou ouss Combin Combinao aonal nal Ideas.

The method of decoying a piece to a desired desi red square and the method m ethod of diverting a piece from defence of a square the method of restricting a piece by means of a pin and many other dierent methods usually attend the carrying out of combinational ideas. Amongst all these methods we pick out the t he method of interception on its own though essentiallyy it fulf essentiall fulfils ils the same role as the method of diversion from defe de fenc ncee of a square. squar e. The The same sam e rol rolee  in fa fact  but but by another means. The The method of interception consists of the fact that by placing one's

queen was cut o from the critical g7 point. Here is a simple and altogether striking example of the surprising and convincing role which is often played by the method of interception. Before us is a position frm the game Reggio Mieses, Mieses, Monte Carlo touament 1901.

piece or pawn square interesting youbetween and thethelocation of the opponent's piece you as it were cut or intercept the line of operation of the enemy pieces and thereby weaken the square on which your combinational attack is directed. The method of interception is very diicult invariably l inked to a sacrifice sacrifice which is highly eective cti ve both superfic superficia ially lly and also

I f the White queen were not on h3 defending the critical e3 square Black would have mated in two move mo vess  22 . . Qe3 + 23 Be2 Qxe2 Qxe2 mate. Black cannot divert the queen from defence of the e3 squaree by simple means. squar means. On 22 22 . . .

in its of creative element surprisecontent. further The increases its e eectiveness cti veness here. We recall  in the immortal game AnderssenKieseritsky the intercepting mve of Andersen 19 e5 with which the communication communication fr from a  g7 was broken and thereby the Black

Bh4 +  Whi White does not take and the bishop but tereplies 23 Ke2 everything is in order with the e3 square. Therefore White was utterly surprised by the manoeuvre to which Mieses resorted in order to intercept the connection of the queen with the e3 square and 160

 

Chess Mleg Mlegame ame Co Combiat mbiations  ions 

which came ike a bot from the

do, then this move ooks forced.

2bue. 2 g3!

However, the o bishop and for anow is cut fromonce the queen's ank, which is subjected at once to a crushing attack.

•

and 23 hxg3 is not possibe because becau se of . . . Qe3. He has to take the rook with the queen, but after 23 Qxg3 Bh4! White oses the queen and, naturay, aso the game. In the foowing miniature game, the method of interception was appied aready in the opening stage. Queen's   Gambit White: D.anows Black: E.chaUopp (Internationa tournament, Nrnberg 896) I d d5 2 c dxc 3 N c5  e3 cxd 5 exd Bg

Perhaps the root of the calamity soon befaing Black lies in just

7 Qa Nc6

Better, but bad enough, is 7 . . . Better, Nd7 8 Ne5 Nf6 9 Bg5 a6! Back is eft at east two pawns down with a shaky king's position.  Ne5 Qxd

Come what may! Objectivey speaking, is a bad ounseor. It was,despair of course, necessary to play 8 .. . Bf5, and, if 9 Nxc6, then 9 .. . Qd7 0 Bb5 a6. True, aso here, her e, by contin continuin uingg  1 d5 d 5 exd5  worse isis   ...Qx ...Qx d 5 1 2 Nc Nc33   2 Nd4, White woud maintain a materia advantage, but the game woud nevertheess have con tinued and, in troubed combinationa compications,

much coud stil happen.

this brisk deveopment of the bishop. Black's queen's ank is exposed to attack and moreover the departure from there of the bishop deprives it of imprtant defensive resources. The most reiabe was 5 .. . e6, e6 , striv ing for a future blockade of the d5 square.

9 Nx Nxcc6 Qe Qe  0 Be 3 bxc6 bxc6   Nc3 Qxg2 2 Bd5!

6 Bxc

White not only recovers the gambit pawn, but combination withaso thethreatens move 7a Bxf7 or Ne5. The undefended bishop on g4 becomes an object of attack.

Intercepting the connection of the queen with the critica c6 point and also attacking the queen. A combinational catas

6 ...e ... e 6

If he does not go back with the bishop, which he possiby shoud 6  

Chess Che ss Ml Mlegam egamee Comb Combinat ination ion

trophe! He could have laid down

castled

his ams challopp a passionate chessbutamateur quite often played on until mate. The end is clear and and i llustrates llustrates excellently the beauty beau ty and power of the method m ethod of interception.

weaknesses embodying tional motives this combinantatve threatens to discharge with combinations. nati ons. The critical criti cal point point in White's position osition  is the g2 squa square re.. A sharp initiative is directed there while the White knight on e is riveted to the defence of this square. The White king finds itself locked in. White's irst rank is defend fe nded ed by by the rook rook  but aalso lso here its influence extends only to the e square. Finally Final ly the the advanci advancing ng palanx of Black's epawn and fpawn occupies threatening positions. The combinational events unfolded like this:

12 exd5 13 Qxc6+ Kd 4 Qxa+ Qx a+ K7 1 5 Qb7 + Ke6 1 6 Qc6+ Bd6 17 Bf4! •••

Workin orkingg out that that after  7 . . . Qxhh  +  8 Kd2 Qx Kd2 Q Qxa xa   he is mate matedd res in three moves chaUopp res ined without waiting in the even ev entt of  7 . . . f6 for for the prosa prosaic ic  8 Qxd6+ Kf7(fS) 9 QxdS+. A combination with wi th the method of interception was carried out very elegantly in the game yin  Genevsky  A.Kubbe played in the Leningrad Championship 925. In the diagram position

33

•••

poston

of

numerous

e3!

This is more energetic than 33 . . . Bf Bf  on which would would follo ollow w 34 Qh3. One of the tasks of Blacks move is to bar the way of the queen

to the king's flank.

Black is about to make his 33rd move.

34 e3

Not possible is 34 Qd3 on which Black wins at once with t doublee attac doubl attackk . . . ex exff2 . 34  is als also refuted by means of the simple 34 ... Bf 3S Qc2 QgS and it is not possible to prevent the interception of the queen's connection wit w it the g2 point point by the the mo move . . . e2  •• •

3 4NowRxe3 there is a new there new threat threat of . . . Rxe  + follow ollowed ed by . . . Qxg2 mate. mate. 35 Qb2

Despite the fact that White has an extra pawn his position is far from easy since Black has full possession of the initiative while upon the presence in the White

White defends te g2 square once more and intends to play Nxd3 at the same time having in mind mi nd al also so som somee "t "trappy rappy comb comb in 62

 

Chess Mleg Mlegame ame Co Combinati mbinations  ons 

ations. Thus on the intercepting

defence or at least in the transfer to

mo move ve 37 35 .Ne7+ . . Re2 ?and follo follows ws 36 Qxe2 Bxe2 White wins. However Black makes another threatening blow which immediately decides the struggle.

the ending stage of the chess game. n the diagram is the position after the 36th move in the game Levensh  Kan (9th UR Championship Leningrad 934)

35 ... B2!!

This time the interception decides immediately. The move is surprising beautiful and strongest in the pres presen entt position. position. On 3355 . . . Bf  White has at Bf at his disposal disposal the

White's poston is better mainly due to the lockedin position of the Black Black bishop. To a considerable extent this circumstance has an an influence influence on White's ini i nititiatat-

ive. The white squares in Black's castled position are really weak and as a combinational motive it prompts one to sear search ch fo for combi combinanations. The Black king is halfopen and might find itself an object of direct di rect attack attack the the more more so so that all al l of of White's pieces are deployed ery harmoniously. Together with this it is not possible to ignore seeral

only but stron only strong g reply reply 36 Kg . But what does White do now? Black thre th reat aten enss . . . Rxe  +  which follows ollows also on 36 Qxc2. f 36 g3 then 36 ... Qe4+. There is no defence. White resigned.

t remains to note that in variations getting up tions up an an idea (a ttack on the g2 pawn) we came across not

counterthreats possibly also cropwhich up for arise Black or in connection connec tion with wi th the open fffile and strong osition of the Black queen and knight Whte eplits the combinational tes n Black's a er elegatl. hee olloe

only thethe method but also methodofofinterception diversion of the rook from the first rank and decoy of the queen to c2 in order to then win it by ... Rxe +. Let us look at another example where the method of interception in combinaitons was applied to

37 d6! xh3+

63  

Chess Mdleg Mdlegame ame Co Combati mbations  ons 

Black, naturally, strives quickly

41 ... Nh7 42 Be6+ leads to a

to exploit hi s count counterch erchances. If at onc once e 37 37 . . his . Ba8, Ba 8, then then 38 ances. Qe Qe 7, with the threat Qxf8 Qxf8 + ! and White holds a dangerous initiative. For example, exa mple, 38 . . . Ng6 39 Qe6 Qe6 + Kh7 40 Ne8 with a very strong attack. Also 38 . . . Qf6 would would lead lead to to a diicultt endgame for diicul for Black aft after er 39 Qxf6 Rxf6 40 Re8+ Rf8 41 Re7, and, if 41 . . . N x h 3 + , t he n 42 K Kh2 h2 Ng5 43 Be2 with wi th a great advanta advantage, ge,

quick end, but now he can apply the method of interception.

sinc since x8 +is, and no not White, pos possible sible in viewe of. . .44RRe8 Re Whit e, besides Bxa6, threatens the convincing move f4. 38 Kh NgS

Black exploits his hi s combinational possibilities. ossibilities. If now now 39 N xb7 ? the thenn 39 . . . Rx Rx and and the chance chancess pass pass over to Black. 39 Bg4 Bg 4 Qx QxeS eS 40 RxeS Ba

An endgame approaches, or at

42 BfS

With this move, intercepting the fle, the Black rook is cut o fr from om the the king's k ing's posi pos i tition on and cannot take part in the defence against te move Re8+. 42  fS?

Prematu Prem ature re capitulation. capitulatio n. 43 NxS NxS K 44 Nd6 Nd6+ + and Bac resigned bishop. since he loses also a

Though Black made a fatal mistake on the 42nd move, could e have counted on saving himself uponn the upo the best reply reply 42 . . . g6 ? A Ass a detailed analysis shows, even in this case Black would have to suer defeat def eat.. After After 42 . . . g6 43 Re8 Re8 + Kg7 44 Rxa8 gxf5 45 Rxa6 te White pawn on a4 quickly and for-

least the threshold of an endgame, in which White, at prese present, nt, is eve evenn a pawn down. However the game continuation con tinuation makes makes it clear c lear wh whyy he is striving for this position.

cibly proceeds to a8. For example 45 ... c5 46 a5 Ne4 47 Ra7+ 6 (orr 47 . . . Kg6  Ne8 c4 49 bxc4 b3 (o 50 Rb7 Nc5 51 Rg7+ and mate in two moves) moves ) 48 N e8 + Ke6 49 a6 Rf (Black does not hurry with the counterat coun terattack tack 49 . . . Rh4 Rh4 + 50 Kg Kg  f4 5 1 Rg7 N Ngg3 5 2 K K Rh Rh  53 K K  5 4 Kx Kxff4 ) 50 Rh7 Ra  (a lso nnoow he does not save hi mself by 50 . . . f4 5 1 a7Kf5 N N52552 g4! g4!7 +or Kg5 5 1 . .5. 4Ng Ng3 Kh3 Kf 3 Rf7 Rf Rg7 R 3g752 + Kf5 55 Nd6+) 51 a7 and Black is helpless against this pawn. We present in full the following game, in which the inal combination was both conceived and carried out by means of an inter

41 f4! f4 O course, 41 ... Nf7 42 Be6 or

164  

Chesss M Ches Mlega legame me Combiat Combiations  ions 

ception of the communication of

naments.

pieces, 8th rank. n it, the defending concludingthecombinational idea is, as it were were , the logical consequence of the initiative which White takes almost at once, once, j st as the opening stage is completed. This game was awarded the first special prize prize for beauty of combinacombina tion and deservedly became world famous.

4 Bg2Nbd7 Bd6 5 0  0 0 0 6 b3 Re 7 Bb2 4

Here, this advance was perhaps an innovation and surprised Black. n other games of this same touament, as also in earlier games, Reti continued 8 d3 now, allowing Black the future prospect of sett se tting ing up, without hindrance, a pawn formation with ... eS etc.  . c6 

Reti pening

White: R.Re Black: E.Bogobov nteational Touament New York 924)

1 NJ Nf6 2 c4 e6 3 g3 d5

The quiet, talented Hungarian grandmater di directed rected the idea of his sharp opening opening against Black' Black'ss pawn outpost on dS. The prototype of this opening

apparent strength of theDespite pawn the triangle in the centre, c6dSe6, White sets out to prove that this super supe rfic icia iall impression does not represent the true state of affairs. 9 Nbd2

White now threatens to play Qc2 and then e4. e4 . The opening has has j ust finished ( though though things things are are stil st illl far from being in order for Black on

looked like this: 1 N dS 2 c4 (Carlsbad 1923). However,, if However if,, i n reply to 1 Nf N f3 , Black chooses a system of developmentt without an early men early . . . dS (for (for example, a foation in the spirit of the King's ndian Defence or with the development of both bishops on the flanks, accompanied by the move ... cS), then,

the queen's ank), while the struggle is already entering a phase of cri critic tical al tension. tensi on. Befo Before re Black are important questions which really have to be sorted out. The first question is whether to to take the iniin itiativ tia tivee by immediately pushing pushing the epawn, and, if not, then how to prevent White's abovementioned plan.

sooner later, White has one t o resort rescan ort to the or classical d4. What say about Black's last move is that, quite qui te apart from rom its i ts posit positional ional side si de,, it goes halfway to meeting Reti's innovative idea which at this time had already had quite a few experimental trials in inteational inteational tour

The idea idea of. . . bneral, 6,ral, ffoll ollo by . s.. Bb7 , arises. In gene ge itowiseneces nd ecessary to see to what extent the move e4 could be unpleasant, unpleasant, i . e . what it brings in its wake, and many other things. Black thought for a long time over the arising problems, but the decision he makes tus out to 165

 

Chess Ml Mlegam egamee Combintions 

be far from the bes, to say the

exf3 3 Bxf3

least.

 already Whitebattle in a serious in theengaging centre, whle Black has still not mobilised hs queen's flank. This, of course, is one of the results of his 9th move.

3

•

Qc7

A natural attempt to force White himself to exchange on d7, bu t this gives gi ves White an extra temp tempoo in ini i nitia tiative tive and an inviolable phalanx of pawns in the centre. Blac 9

•• ••• •

Ne4

t is possible to censure this thrust, giving giv ing various vari ous kinds of posiposi tional considerations (which, as is wellknown, can always be called into question), but its inferiority is best shown by the concrete continuation occu occurrin rringg in the game. game.  t is diicult to establish, but highly possi pos sible ble,, that Black went in for this

would have set 3 up ...a defencehave in easily he variation NxeS  4 dxeS dxeS BcS BcS +  S Kg Kg22 B Bd7 d7 6 e4 g6, but even here, after 7 exfS gxfS  B, White has a strongl pronounced initiative. 4 Nxd7 Nxd7 Bxd7 5 e4 e5

Otherwise the advance eS, and then also dS, crushes Black. 6 c5 B 7 Qc2

White now threatens both dxeS

and exfS.

move without wi thout a deep calculation of its consequences, and partly also because the variations examined, or other continuations, did not satisfy him. Actually the variation 9 . . . eS 0 cxdS cxdS cxdS cxdS   dxeS dxeS NxeS 1 2 N xeS xeS BxeS 3 BxeS RxeS RxeS  4 N  Re  S Qd3 or  S Qd4 wo would uld leave Black in a poor state around the dS pawn. Probably he also

 7 ex exd4 d4  8 ex exf5 f5 Rad Rad8 8  9 BS BS Re5 20 Bxd4 Rxf5 • •

Black has recovered the pawn and achieved exchanges. t seems the main main dange dangers rs are are over over  but in in fact fa ct a combinat combi nation ion,, as surprising surpri sing as as it is brilliant, awaits him. 2  Rxf5 xf5 Bxf5 Bxf5 22 2 2 Qxf Qxf5 Rxd4 23 Rfl Rd8

There is 23 nowhere move the bishop bishop. . On . . . Be 7 to fol follow lows s mate ma te in thre threee moves. moves. f, f, hhow owever, ever, 23 . . . Qe7, then 24 Bf7+ Kh 2S BdS intercepting the line of retreat of thee rook th rook to d d.. On 22SS . . . Qf Qf66 folol lows 26 Qc. 24 B + K8 25 Be8!! Bac

lo look ed at or the the 0 continua conQc2. tinuation tion . . b6 0oked NeS Also9 .upon these, the se, White White maintains the initiatinitia tive. Other possible continuations were 9 ... Qe7 or 9 ... a. A tho  rough investigation investiga tion of all these would require too much time. 0 Nx Nxe4 dxe4 dxe4 1 1 Ne5 f5 2  !

66  

Chess Mleg Mlegame ame C Combiat ombiations  ions 

8



Ng4

Lasker this in the 7th game game of his hi splayed match with w ith chlecht ch lechter. er.

Black has no defence against the double attack of the queen and rook on f8. The strength of this attack also "raises to a second power the bishop, intercepting the 8th rank. A brilliant example of the triumph of superior harmony. The reader will have probably noted the fac factt that tha t in i n nearly all the illustrations we have given, with

9 e6!

The pawn intercepts the connection of the bishop with the g4 square; squa re; 9 . . . fxe fxe6 or 9 . . . Bxe6 leads leads to the lloss oss of the knight. knight. On 9 . . . N h6 follow followss  0 Bxh6 Bxh6 and and exf exf7 + . 9

•••

£5  0 0  0

Now the White pawn on e6 is

very cramping for Black, which determines a positional advantage for White. One more small example. In a game from the Leningrad Championship 930, Romanovsky Romanovsky Koyaovich after the 36th move a sharp struggle brought the opponents to this osition.

the exception of the combination in the game, ReggioMieses, the intercepting piece was the bishop, which cannot be considered accidental. Undoubtedly, also the knight proves useful for this role, but in practice such a role falls on the knight comparatively rarely. An interception can also be made by the pawn. In the icilian Defence, there is this variation:  e4 c5N£6 2 NO Nc6d63 6d4c4 cxd4 Nxd4 5 Nc3 g6 47 Nxc6 bxc6 8 e5

Here already there is a combination. If 8 . . . dxe5 dxe5 ? then 9 Bxf7 Bxf7 + Black obtains a diicult game also after 8 . . . Nd7 9 eexd xd66 exd exd66  0 00 00 etc. 

67  

Chess Mdle Mdlegame game Comb Combiatio iations  ns 

There followed: 3 And  the pawn fulfilled a double

role, by intercepting the connection of the Black queen queen with w ith the t he g8 square and also increasing the harmony in i n the operation of the Black rooks. Neither of the rooks can take the pawn, p awn, in v iew of Qg8 + follo ollowed by f + . If, howev however er,, 3 7 . . . Qxf7, then 38 Rxd7 Qxd7 39 Qg8+ and 40 f mate. Bck resned

Chapter 12, which we end with this little example, concludes, in its tu, also all our o ur investigatio investigations ns into methods of combinational operations operatio ns and and the role and significance of of combinat combi nation ional al ideas in the creative processes of the chess struggle.

creatvty is infinite! We see our own task as something andalli seems to us, mainly andelse, above to set up, where possible, theore titical cal landmarks on ways ways to develo develo combinations, furtermore to bring out the role of combinations as an inevitable companion of every creative process, and inally o present combinations to the reader as the original source of aesthetic in chess art, as a basic element in chess But beauty. both in Middlegame Comi nations and Middlegame Plannin

the question is not touched upon how ho w th thee thin th inking king of a chessplayer chessplaye r i conducted during the chess game, which of its elements, conse qences, basic directions, and many other things, the chessplayer thinks about, when bending over

the board. To this question, which bot parts of Middlegame touch upon we devote the following chapter.

O course, it is impossible, in

deed there is also no need, to include in the book all pos possibl siblee cases cases of combinations. Combinational

18  

Chapter Chap ter Th Thir irtee teen n Abou Ab outt the the Thin Think king ing of a Chess Chesspl play ayer  er  Duri Du ring ng the the Game. Game.

In M ile ilega game me Planni Planning ng and Com binations the reader is given giv en a great great deal of varied material for study, but, naturally, the author is inte-

greater methodical experien greater experience ce,, observation and study of the thin t hinking king of umerous pupils and companions nio ns  highly rat rated ed ce cess ssplay player ers,s,

res rested ted indoes the the an que quest stion ion  to what whaoft extent examination book illustrations, games, examples, schemes and other things, even the accompanying comments of the author, help a chessplayer improve his play. It is one thing to study theoretical and creative questions in a book, another to apply the knowledge in practice.

points atoplayer the fact that,thinks duringin te game, often an undisciplined way, if not to say higgledypiggledy. It is precisely this circumstance which gives rise to the "sickness of timetrouble, an intrusion intrusion of a not no t quite natural natural psychological factor in the process of play, and some other harmful phenomena. Meanwhile disciplined thoughts, plus knowledge

 isObservations a basic basic gua guaran rante teee ofthat success. succplayers ess. show sometimes come to quick, premature decisions in positions which require deep reections, and, on the other hand, engage in much and also stubborn thought where there is no reason. ometimes, in positions where a player is presented with two equivalent continuations, instead of choosing one of these and then conforming to the deci decision sion already already made made , he stubboly bo ly tries tries to disco discover ver  which of the two continuations is nevertheless better, and spends a great deal of eort and time on this, and, after af ter establi estab lishi shing ng nothing, is fforced orced to pick up a motive in favour of

the gamesolve it is great necessary to During independently and small creative problems and to do this mentally only, without moving the pieces on the board. Thee strict Th strict rule rule  "touchmov "touchmove e is inexorable. Besides this, thinking time is regulated by special chess clocks. Exceeding the timelimit entails enta ils def defeat  also an inexora inexorable ble rule. Under Und er such su ch conditions conditions,, a player must, if he is sitting at the board with the intention of gaining victory, mobilise to the utmost his thoughts, his memory, his imagination. The author's author 's gr great eat playing p laying experience, while, possibly, even 169  

Chess Mdle Mdlegme gme C Combat ombations  ions 

one of these. Wishing to make a

fi firs rstt attempt at tempt to establi estab lish sh at least le ast the

move based realisation, he begins to on look100% for an artiicial reason, farfetched, so to speak, in order to reassure himself and set aside doubts and hesitation. With satisfaaction, satisf ctio n, he will wil l come to a deci deci-sion based upon some small motive, not having a direct regard to the position, and essentially deceive himself. The question as to which rook, from f or a, should go to d  , is at times a matter of conce for a player, who, after lengthy thought thought,, fails ai ls to find a solusolu tion; what w hat then? then? ometimes, after an hourlong deliberation, a player makes a bad move as a consequence of uncertain thoughts, skipping from one theme to another in pursui pu rsuitt of artificial reaso reasons, ns, etc. et c. Final Finally, ly, we come come

main at the of board,a attractobjects the which, thoughts chessplayer during the game, and to systematis systemat ise, e, with wi thin in the the boun bounds ds of possibililitity, possib y, the continuous continuous link lin k of of a chessplayer with positions and variations. And so, how do the thoughts of rated chessplayers proceed, at the board, during the game? It is comparatively easy to give, in general, the features over which the thoughts of a player exert themselves in the process of play. We call the basic obj ects of the eor eortt of of thinking, thin king, the elements of thinking. Observing the consecutive nature of the process of thinking, one can be convinced of the fact that there are three elements of thinki thi nking. ng. Th Th fi firs rstt  is the pos pos itition ion which whic h is bef befor oree

across also such phenomena as confusion of of thoughts, demoralisatio demoralisa tion, n, etc. It is possible to give thousands of examples of thoughts which have lost their t heir zest and much other evidence of the collapse of thinking thin king right up to real chaos. All this points to the great importance of the question of the thinking of a chessplayer playe r during dur ing the the game. O course, with reference to

the eyes of the player, i.e. the actual arrangement of pieces and pawns on the board at the present moment. mom ent. The The seco second nd  is the calculation of variations to which this position directs the attention, and thee third th third  the the position position which appears mentally to the chessplayer upon the completion of the variation, we call the postvariation position.

creative imagination, it is possible to construct a stereotype. In art, each person creates his own forms within the limits of his own imagination, his own ingenuity, knowledge, experience, inspiration, etc. Therefore we shall make onlyy an onl an attemp attemptt  appa appare rently ntly the

three the effrt of These thinking (theobjects three ofelements of thinking) are characteristic for positions of approximate equality, and also al so for for the t he thinking think ing of that tha t of the opponents who at the present moment of the struggle has the iniin itiative. 70

 

Chess Che ss Ml Mlega egame me Combin Combintion tions  s 

The abovementioned three elements thinking thi nking as basic, basi c,s bec becaus auseeofthe will wi ll ofwe theclass player play plays a decisive role in them. Other elements of thinking assume a dependent character and are the consequence of a certain submission to the will wil l of the the opponent opponent.. uch eleele ments of thinking thi nking are characteristic for a chessplayer, struggling against the initiative of the opponent and forced to defend defend hi h i mself with wi th onlyo nlymoves. t is not worth touching upon questions of thinking (elementss of thinking) on obvious conment continuations. For example, in the variation of the panish Game, 1 e4 e5 2 N Nc6 3 Bb5 a6 4 Bxc6, it is obvious that tha t Black can only reply 4 . . . bxc6 bxc6 or 4 . . . dxc6, dxc6, and and tha thatt he will not play, instead of this, 4 ... Bc5 ? Upon obvious, compulsor compulsoryy

consideration

which

prompted

them to chooseWith namely given continuation. thethe play of rated chessplayers, moves are not made so simply, but on the basis of considerations revolving around two interrelated and interacting phenomena which determine the process of the chess game, around the position posit ion and around around variations. The opponents go into the character of the position and into vriations also to justi the decision they have made. Thoughts begin to exert themselves more strongly when there is a choice of several continuations and there is not suiciently clear information to make an objective decision. n these cases, besides experience, acquired earlier, which is transformed into intuition, on the

moves, the of thinking minimal and eort consequently the ele-is ments of thinking are hardly touched touc hed upon, upon, Finally, Finall y, we will wi ll also not refer to the question of thinking in the opening, partly because, to a significant extent, the thinking here is a consequence of knowledgee obtained knowledg obta ined fro from m the ttheoheory of opening openi ngss or is a result resul t of specspec ial preparation for for the game, partly partl y

scene and also attitude appears the taste of subjective a player, reflecting his nature and personal pointt of view. t is wel poin welllknow knownn that apropos this or that move, and sometimes even a whole plan, discord occurs even between grandmasters. That which pleases one, does do es not quit qu itee pl please ease the other, oth er, and and vice versa. A dispute arising at the end of

also because ouropening, book is but in no devoted to the to way the middlegame. It is perfect perfectly ly clear cle ar that, th at, for for every move made on the board, there ought to be a reason. Even beginnerss , if they are ginner are asked why they ade one or other move, give some some

the chess l ast century last centu ry between two giants of thought, W.teinitz and M.Chigorin, about creative methods of play is a good example of this statement. They debated the permissible degree of risk in creative experiments , the principles of of evaluating evalu ating 171

 

Chess M dle dlegam gamee Combiations  Combiations 

a poton, the specific gravity of

reect, as it were, the essence, the

combinations in the of the chess struggle, andprocesses many other things. Just as in any art, in chess there is argument argument.. One cannot call cal l for un unif iform ormitityy fro from m the th e think t hinking ing of chessplayers during a game, and it would be useless to search for it in the numerous creative forms even of classical chess thought. However there are quite a few criteria for an objective evaluation of a position, i.e. weak and strong squares,s, open l ines, invasion of square of piepi eces, exposed king's position, pawn centre and other pawn formations, etc. uite enough has been said iddlg gam am Plann about them them in M iddl i and quite a bit also in Middl gam ga m Combinaions Al these these po posisiional and combinational factors are equally respected by

basicmight point say. of the theUsually position posi tion, , ititss core cor e, we there will not be more than two or three factors, and, compared with other elements of evaluation, they look signiicant and rivet the attention of a player. In analysis, in commentaries to games, and even in verbal discussions of this or that move, we constantly come across the expression "played "pl ayed not in i n the spirit spi rit of the position or "in the spirit of the position would would be he here . . .  etc. What, however, is meant by this mysterious spir sp irit, it, about which we fin findd so so frquent mention i chess literature? It is precisely the spirit of a position which makes up its meaning  its core, the "main thing which

he chessplayers questionofleads all creative mostly shades. to the estabishment of the signicance for the present position of any of the abovementioned factors. It is precisely here that most frequently arise contradictions, errors in the thinking of a chessplayer, such as underesimation or overestimation of individual factors. However, a player's experience and taent play pl ayss

deliberation over a move or variation should base itself upon. To understan under standd the spirit spi rit of a positio positionn  this means, more or less objectively, to comprehend its conditions, to find a just reason for a move and present it as a general aim, bringing it to the fore. Hence it is not diicult to conclude that the spirit of of a position position  is an understanding of strategical ideas by 

a  great here. henrole deiberating upon a move it is useful to take into account all factors which hep one to draw closer to an obj obj ective evaluation ev aluation of the positon, but the most important thing is to be abe to grasp, amongst many factors, those which

chessplayer, whereas aa variation, fo for r example examp le,, represents reection of tactical ones. To play not in the spirit spi rit of of the position position  this this mean meanss making a strategical mistake, and a strategical mistake will usually be fraught with serious consequences. Finally Final ly,, the the spirit spi rit of a posit position ion is 172

 

Ches Ch esss M le lega game me Comb Combi iat atio ions  ns 

a landmark which guides the

the game, which is not assessed on

thoughts a player pl ayerof essential essentia l po positional sitionalofqualities oto f the ththe e situation. In playing a move, a chessplayer always endeavours to make it in i n the spirit of the position and ought to be convinced after making it that this is in i n fact the case. One should not think that there might be only one single move which represents a continuation in the spirit of the osi o sitio tion. n. It can can be that this thi s is precisely so, but many situations allow onee , two, at other times on ti mes even more continuations which are in full accord with the spirit of the positon. In such cases, the thinking of a player, on the one hand, is even simpliied, in that there is a choice available, av ailable, but i t is also comp compll icated icated since the choice wi ll at other times be a diicult one, and, thinking

thee pawn th basis ofweaknesses, general general principles, princip les, lines, such as open better development, etc, since the equilibrium is upset in many sectors, and there cannot be a precise balance. An attempt to calculate cula te variations variations is also not always successf succes sfuu l . Let us say that there are six or seven diere dierent nt contin continuat uations ions for White, and Black has, on each move, five or six in reply. It is not hard to see that not even a genius can get up u p even to the fourth fourth move in the calculation calc ulation of of variations. It is is then that comes to his aid, intuition, imagin imaginatio ationn  a force orce which gives chess art ar t very beautiful beautiful combinations and allows chessplayers to experience the true joy of creativity. Intuitive thinkin thinkingg  th is is a basic basic

"Prerequisites for chess creativity are usually considered to be logi, accurate calculation of variations and technique, including, in the

question whic requires requir es special elutocidation, which and hwe do not intendeludwell on it in the present chapter. We gave the statement of D. Bron Bronstein stei n as extra and authoratautho rative evidence of the fact that positions occur, where, even for a grandmaster, an objective evaluation, as wellll as finding a logical move, preswe ents great diiculti diiculties es,, and and that the only way out of this "blind alley,

latter, an ofunderstanding and knowledge theory. However, there is also a fourth component, possibly the most attractive, though one whic wh ichh is frequently requently forgotten. I have in mind intuition, or, if you like, chess imagination. At times a position is obtained in

Bronstein, for solution example,toconsiders, is an intuitive the problem. Howe Howeve verr intuition  is not not an element of thinking, and we must searchh for another searc another solution. solut ion. We must be guided by the spirit of the posi position, tion, i . e. ind ind a starting starting point for a move or variation. Per

over a move move, , a playerand begin begihesitation. ns to bury himself in doubts Aprop Ap ropos os of of this, thi s, we think i t is useuse ful to quote a statement of grandmaster D. Bronste Bronstein in from his book nttional toument ofG masters. Here is what he writes:

173  

Chesss Mle Ches Mlegame game Combin Combintions  tions 

haps it is better to interpret a posi-

mended in the opening reference

tion tiiton wro rongly, ngly, than not no t to interpre interprett at w all. O cour course se the th e question about the spirit of a posi positio tion, n, is not solved solved as simply as it i t looks on paper, and not infrequently even chess masters lose their way here. It is possible to show sh ow that the spi s piri ritt of a position posit ion is a highly variable value and that it is necessary to interpret it after almost every every move. This Th is is clearly an error. You see, by alienating yourself from the spirit of the position, you usually already intend an approximate plan of action, which guides guid es you until unti l some extraordinary extraordinary incidents, which abruptly change the conditions of the struggle, occur in the game. It goes without saying, we have to include such extraordinary extraor dinary incidents in the work

books, can ... 6Nd7, whicn White caisn 5play play h4 h4  aonvariation variatio wellknown in opening theory under the name of Chatard Chat ard Attack. Attack . 6 Nxe4 BxgS 7 NxgS QxgS 8 g3 cS 9 c3 Nc6 Nc6  0 f4 Qe7 1 1 NO Bd7 2 Qd2 0-0 3 Bd3

The opening stage can be considered to be over. True, White has still not castled, but it will ob-

of our them, thoughtsrenew and, i nthe accordance accordance with starting point of our future operations; in other words, to plan the game all over again, or to some extent all over again The fol following lowing game might mig ht serve as a good example of all that we have said about the spirit of the position.

viously Itfollow the asvery move. is clearonthat soonnext as White castles, he wil willl begin to prepare an attack on the king's flank, where conditions are quite favourable for a display of the initiative. At the present moment, it is Black's move, and, in deliberating upon up on iit,t, he must about all solve the the question of how to counter the events about to happen on the

French Defence

king's tsank. chance consis consists of of play pl ayBlack's on the basic queen's ank and partly partly in the centre, in connecconnection with the not unfavourable for him pawn tension "cSd4. Possible, for example, was even an immediate 13 ... cxd4 and, on 1 4 Nx Nxdd4  14 . . . ff6, 6, brea reaking ing up

White: L.Foacs Black: .Tartakover nteational Conress in memory of M.Chiorin (Petersbur 1909)

1 e4 e6 2 d4 dS 3 Nc3 Nf6 4 BgS Be7 S eS Ne4

The usual continuation, recom 174  

Chess Mdlegam Mdlegamee Comb Combatio ations  ns 

White's awn wedge on e5. In the

Ne6+.

event of 14 an cxd4, Blacke of already evoke exchang exc hange ocould f queens by continuin continuingg . . . Qb4. Qb4. Also good good was to make the preparatory move 13 ... Rac8, having in mind, after 1 4 00, 00, to und under erta take ke play play by 1 4 . . . cxd4 15 cxd4 Nb4. In short, the spirit of the position must be prompted mpt ed by the Black Black move movess . . . cxd4, . . . Rc8, Rc8, . . . f6 f6 (an (and e v e n . . . f5) f5) , in a certain order, which would have secured him a firm posit posi t ion and not bad prospects in the future play. But how did Tartakov artakover er play ? Alas, Alas , not at all in the spirit of the pposiosition, and to be be exact 

22 Nd8 23 e6 Ra6 24 Qe5 Kh6 25 Rlf5 e6 26 N + Qx 27 Rh5 + Kg7 28 Rxg6 mate.

3

• • 

4?

Black, without taking into account White's territorial advantage on the queen's flank, flank, raises the

••

By sacriicing the pawns on the 17th and 18th moves, White clearly foresaw, by calculating variations, the irresistibility of the attack he obtains, either on the  square, along the ffile, or on the h6 point point,, in the the eve event nt of 19 . . . h6 20 Nh 7 etc et c . The pawn sacrifice sacrifice was confirmed by concrete variations, but Forgacs' idea was aimed at this sacrifice, in the spirit of the position, tio n, which whi ch was easily prompt prompted ed by the vulnerability of a badly defended king's position. The move 1 3 . . . c4 oobvi bvious ously ly tue tuedd out out not not to be in the spirit of the position,

siege on the d4 pawn, closes the

which was confirmed by the further

cfile and for in this wayattack gives on White full scope a direct the king's ank. Forgacs mercilessly punishes his h is opponent oppo nent fo for not playing in the spirit of the position.

course of the game. We mention further that the further the spis pirit of a position and the requirement of a posi position, tion, as people sometimes like to express it, are not quite identical concepts. The requirement of a position is a loud voice, allowing no objections, which indicates a single possible correct continuation continuati on or the need to transfer play to a combinational

4 B2 B 2 b5 5 0 0 a5 6 Ra Raee l  1 7 £5 !

The spirit of the position for White  clear. I t calls fo for a direct, energetic ener getic attack on the th e Black king's k ing's position. •••

Ofncou course, apath. posito positon also a lsorse, reflect reflthe ectsrequirement s the spirit spiri t ofofa position, but a reverse dependence between the spirit and the requirement of a position does not exist. The concept of the spirit of a position is far broader, it continues to servee as a sett serv se ttingo ingo base base for chess chess 

1 7 Al f5 . .8 g4!do Ng5 g6. Also soex19 . h6 dog4 es no not9sav save e him. him

Then 20 N h 7 Rf Rfd8 d8 2 1 Nf6 Nf6 + gxf6 gxf6 22 Qxh6 f5 23 Bxf5 Bxf5 24 Rxf5 f6 25 Rxf6 Qh7 26 Qg5+ Kh8 27 Rh6. 20 R Kg7 2  Re Refl fl Be8 22 4

This is more energetic than 22 175  

Chess Che ss d dleg legame ame Combi Combitio tions  ns 

pyrs v wh th pto

1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 N6 3 Bb5 a6 4

os t .ot iict y ruirmt W hv hv  ry mtio mtio tht it is ot wys sy to ptrt ito th spirit of th posi positio tio. . Thr r so chsspyrs who v cosciousy igor it. uch chsspyrs i fct isrgr  objctiv vutio v utio of th th  po posi sitio tio , pyig ot i th spirit of th positio but i th th  spirit spiri t of thir ow moo  tst, wi, s  ru, b cruy puish by  oppot, for whom th t h spirit of th po positio sitio rprsts th bsic bs ic sourc of crtcr tiv pths. Th mi m i pyig p yig strgth strgth of th ub chsspyr, pbc, cosist of th fct tht h was wys gui by th spirit of th

Bx6 Hr, s is wkow, th r-

trt of th bishop to 4 is aso possib. Both this rtrt  th cotiutio chos by pabac fu fuy y mts th spirit of th posiposi to, to , owig Whit to choos choos o o of th ps. 1 ) to bs bs his play pla y o th th mor mor fuvu, mor compact paw chi, or 2) to prpr for a attck o Bck's's kig Bck k ig'ssi 'ssi cast positio positio, , o th th  bsis b sis of a frsight frsight coccoctrtio of forcs o appropriat squars a igoas. I his practic, apbaca ary aways chos my th sco sco pa, pa , a th cptur o c6 was of cours a surpris for th tmprmta

Jowski.

positio. Noboy cou compr

•••

withfutssy him i th biity toth quicky  urst cor of  positio, positio , i ts spiri spi rit.t. pb pbca ca cou mk  mistk i ccuatio, ot choos choos th bst vritio, but h i ot mk  mistk i th ssssmt of  posi positio tio wh wh it ws  ustio of its spirit, its mai poit, th importt  sstia i it. W xmi th foowig is-

4 Th dx6 B5 6 cotiuad3 most5 Nc3 cosistt

tio, upo which Back, for a o tim, has to rcko with th "isoatio of his outpost o 5.

6 ... Bg4 7 Be3 Bxe3

This improvs Whit's gam, as h obt ob tis is th op f fii a a firm paw supriority i th ctr. I itio to this, aftr castig, Whit without iicuty upis th kight  attack a obtis clar prosp prospcts cts of of a o th Back kig i th vt of its castig o th qu'ssi. qu'ssi . Itrstig, howvr, is what coul hav prompt aowski to mk this xchag. It is car tht his hrt os ot

tructiv gm i th ight of this sttmt. panish Game

Whit: .R.Capabana Bck: D.anowski nteational Touament Petersbur 1914)

176  

Ches Ch esss M le lega game me Comb Comb t t 

ie in such moves as 7 . . . Bb4 or or 7 . . . Bd6 Bd6 , since this wou woudd be an admission of the unsatisfactory nature, or at east the insuicienty satisfactory nature, of his 5th move. Why, however, he refrained from 7 . . . Qe 7 remains remains uncear. uncear. Concretee variations do not cear up Concret this question suicienty. For exampe, examp e, 8 Na4 Bxe3 9 fxe3 Qb4 + ( Pre Precisey this, wherea whereass af after 9 . . . Bx 1 0 Qx Qb4+ 1 1 Nc3 Qxb Qxb22 12 Kd2! White, threatening both Rhb 1 and Qg3 with an attack on the g7 and e5 pawns, woud have thee better th better position) position) 10 c3 Bx Bx 1  gx ( 1 1 cxb cxb 4 Bxd Bxd 1 2 R x d Nf6, Nf6, and Back's position is preferabe because of his better pawn forma ti tion on)) 1 1 . . . Qe 7 , and Ba Back ck,, thr threa ea tening ... b5 and ... Qh4+, could

queen's ank. Aso, the queen move forces Back into a sow and uncomfortabe uncomf ortabe deveopment of the knight via the the ank ank  the h6 squasquare. In the third situation, obtained after ive moves, Back has to nevertheess exchange on f3 in order to deprive White's king's knigh� of the possibiity of taking part in the attack. Thus  anowski anowski made a serious serio us error in assessing the position which is obtained after casting queen'sside. In the spirit spir it of the position now now was the continuation continuation 8 . . . f6 , and and then th en 9 0 00 Ne 7 1 0 Qe 00 00  1 Qg3 Qg3 Be66 1 2 N h4 Qd7 3 R Kh8 1 4 Be Raf c5 15 Nf5 Ng8, and Black's defensive ine is quite soid. After . . . Ra Rad8 d8 Bac Backk himsef hi msef coud disdis -

obtain the initiative.

pay activity by ... c4.

8 Bxc5 Qxc5 d4The asocontinuation does not promise White9 anything. Back coud pay both, simply 9 ... Bx, and 9 ... Qb4, when wh en 1 0 dxe5 Qxb2 woud tu out in Back's favour.

is perfecty cear that sonIt for the mistaken, notthe in reathe spirit of the position, chosen pan, is an insuicienty deep penetration into the position posit ion reached aft after er the 7th move and a superficia ook at it without an examination of concrete variations. It is i s a danger dangerous ous mistake to think th ink that calcuation is possibe only on forcing variations. This is far from being so. so. In calcua calc uating ting variat var iations ions we have in mind that repy of the opponent which, in our view, meets the spirit spir it of of the the position posit ion,, and and represents, if not the best, then a good, natural move. It goes without saying that there are positions where it is very diicut to embark

 e3 Qe7

Back does not want to exchange bishop for knight, but the latter "weighs heavy on the e5 pawn and, naturaly, Back takes measures for its defence. At the same time Black opens up for himsef hi msef the possibility of casting on the queen'sside. The decision made by Black Bla ck contradicts the spirit of the position which has emerged. The Back king wil wi l not be safey safey paced on the 1 7 7   

Chess Che ss M Mlegame legame Com Comba bation tions  s 

on vaatons due to the various possibilities the neverth side. I t is diicul difrom icult,t, but nopponents evertheles elesss possibl po ssible. e. However, such positions  are a minority. Apparently, anowski did not delve particularly deeply into the position, in any case he did not foresee even Whites 1  th move, move, and with it Capablancas Capa blancas whole plan p lan of attack.

knight, via the f6 and d7 squares, to b8, reinforces a6 and c6 where pawns itagainst whichthe Whites attack will be directed.

9 0-0 --?

Not played at all in the spirit of the positon! positon ! You see, when there there is castling on opposite sides, one of the best and right ways of securing the initiative is a pawn attack (storm (stor m ! ) on the the king kingss position. It is possibe to see with the naked eye that White has at his disposal all thee pr th pre ere requ quisisites ites for for such an attack on the queens flank, while Black

1 1 Rb l ! !

The White a and b pawns will begin a storm of the weakly defended Black kings position. The diiculty of the defence is redoubled by the advanced posit posi t ion ion

has no chances at all for such an

of the pawns on a6 and c6. The

attack onconsiderably the kings ank. controls more White space here. Therefore, even now, Black should have still stuck to the plan pointed out abov abovee , and played played 9 . . . f6 followe ollowedd by . . . Nh6 and and . . . 

White afterctthree moves, bpawn, wi ll enteralready into into contact conta with wit h them. 11

The last preparatory move. In unpinning unpinn ing the knight, knight, the queen is also deployed on a square from

3 a4 Bx

Now Black will be subjected to the will ofpursuing the opponent; exchange, the aim thi of diverting the White rook from the ueens ank, is hardly necessary On  3 . . . Be6 , White, White, after  4 bbSS cxbS 1 5 axbS a a  6 b6, succe succeeds eds in openin ope ningg th the bfile bfile (  6 . . . c6   N a and then QxaS).

where itank might be transferred to ei either ther fl flan k. •••

£6  2 b4 b 4 f

He should play 2 ... Be6, in order to secure himself against the invasion of the dS square by the White knight; soon afterwards the c6 pawn will be eliminated.

 0 Qel !

0

•••

h6?

Black does not see the danger, butt meanwhil bu meanwhilee he probably already already cannot save the game. Blacks defence would have been strengthened by the transfer of the 78  

Chesss Mdlegam Ches Mdlegamee Combi Combiations  ations 

4 Rx3 b4 15 b5 cxb5 6 axb5 a5

Black has succeeded in avoiding the opening of lines by means of a blockade of the bpawn but the initiative remains in the hands of White who obtains an excellent base on the dS square for his knight. Under the cover of his base White also carries out a decisive advance of the d and c pawns.  7 Nd Nd55 Qc5

Black tries to prevent the advance of the dpawn but these attempts are frui uitless tless  he is only able able to delay for a short while the advance of the White centre. While White has still not consolidated the positio posi tionn of of his knight by c4 c4  the best chance would be to sacrifice

Black eliminates the terrible knight kni ght but . . . at the the cost cost of a ro rook. ok.

26 exd5 xd5 27 c6+ Kb 28 cxd7 Qxd7 29 d5 Re8 30 d6 cxd6 cx d6 3  Qc6 Back Back signe signed d

n this game Capablanca's thoughts had to pass through the first element of thinking i.e. o deliberate over the spirit of the position only once after Black's 9th move 000. n the course of the remaining part of the game his thoughts were mainly taken up by the second element of thinking  variations. variations. The The thirdd eleme thir element nt  the the evaluatio evaluationn of of the ppost ostvari variation ation position position  ococcupied his thoughts probably before th thee calculation calculat ion of the move  5 bS  sinc since after 6 . . . a  i  was important for him to foreee a way

thee exch th exchaange:  7 . . . RxdS   exdS exdS

of de deve velo lopi ping ng th thee attac attackk (  7 NdS  )

e4. 8 c4 Ng5 9 2 Ne6 20 Qc3

so the irtduring line of forAnd a chessplayer thethought game when deliberating upon a move is thee "main thing in the th the positi posi tion on its core co re its pirit  this isis the starting poin for the move or variation. ometimes in clearer positions penetration into the spirit of te positon occurs quickly wihou much inner hesiaion. Often owever ow ever this or that poition poit ion paricularly wen there arises the probe of composing a plan of play requires a dynaic evaluation i.e. a more more o r less less deep peneration ino ariations as i were arising fro the pirit of the present position and ogether with tis correcting te original copreension of the

Rd7 2 Rdl Kb7

Black cannot delay the advance of the White pawns pawns  and this poin to the irreparable irreparable nature of his posiposi tion. tio n. Neverthel Nevertheless ess the king volunvoluntarily walks into a pawn fork (cSc6+). However also after 2 ... Re White carries out a beautiful winning combination: 22 d4 exd4 2 exd4 Qd6 24 cS  bxcS 25 QxaS b 7 26 Ra2 Rb8 27 Qa7+ c 27 Rda with the the deadly threat of of Qxb + . f ... RxbS then 29 Qa+ Rb8 0 Rb  or 0 Rb2 Rb2  22 d4 Qd6 23 Rc2 exd4 24 exd N4 25 c5 Nxd5

79  

Chess Mdleg Mdlegame ame Comb Combatns  atns 

position. A variation often requires very great eort of thought, even when it embodies a combination. At otherr times there arises a conf othe conflict lict in a position, when an examination of of variations leads to the conclusion that there is a mistake m istake in the static evaluation, in an incoect perception of of the heart heart of the positi position on  its spt. However, far from all chessplayer chesspl ayerss will wi ll be b e prepared prepared to rrececognise this, and prefer to play sometimes not in the spirit of the position po sition than retu once again to the process of trying to find the essence of it. The presence of such conflicts comes to light nearly always after the game, during analysis of it. Usually, however, a concrete plan,

chess thought, for chessplayers of such outstanding creative plans as Alekhine, Chigorin, Botvinnik, Bronstein, Keres, Tal, myslo and others, is made up precisely of variations, thought out at the board during the process of the chess game. Bishop's Opening

White: P.Keres Black: D.Bronstein (Candidates touament 956)

I e4 e5 2 B4 Nf6 3 Nc3 N6 4 f4 B5

and on its base a concrete variation, arises the spirit of the position andfrom represents a way, or part pa rt of a way, way, whic whichh doe doess th thee thinking for a chessplayer in order to help find find a solution, soluti on, coming out of the spirit of the position, to the problem, as we saw in the game, CapablancaJ anowski. How does the work of thinking over a variation variati on take pl place ace ? To develop a variation, as it were, attracts ideas. The eort of thinking weakens weak ens if the variation variat ion leads it to a satisfac satisf acto tory ry result, result , i . e . if a pos positon, iton, created as a result of a variation, pleases a player, satisies him. A variation variatio n is a dynamic creati creative ve thoughtt of a player, it is created by though imagination. The basic content of

In this position, positi on, the question question arises: whether White should change the course of the struggle into the channels of the Kings Gambit, by playing now now 5 N , or, by eliminateli minating the eS pawn, to create the threat of form orming ing a powerful centre cen tre after d4. White chooses the second way, and possibly did not look through, suciently concretely, the variations arising as a result of this decision. And so: 5 e5 Nxe5

Now approaches the most tense moment of the struggle, since it is 180

 

Chess Mdleg Mdlegame ame Combia Combiations  tions 

ony possibe to find the correct decision here by means of a deep, dynami dyn amicc evauation, evauation, i . e . an examinationn of a number natio num ber of variations. 6 Bb3

An opinion exists that, by paying 6 Be2 with the threat of d4, White obtains the better position, but do you think one can agree with such an evauation without a dynamic eucidation of this extremey shar situation? In fact, White pays correcty in so far as the contination, 6 d4 N xc4 7 dxc5 00, on purey positiona grounds was not very acceptabe. acceptabe . N evertheess it was quieter, but the search for quietness in such positions far from satisfies everyone. On 6 Be2, Back Ba ck woud have repied repied 6 . . . Bd4 Bd4 ! and Keres undoubtedy, saw the

White agrees, more accuratey is forced, to aow a draw, which is obtained obtain ed at ater er 9 . . . Qf2 + 10 Be2 Qe3 + 1 1 Ke 1 Qf2 +. Howeve However,r, Back, taking into account the difficut position of the White king, consid con siders ers that the t he spirit spir it of the posi posi-tion demands more from him. 9

•••

11

Nc6 0 Qf Qf3 N 1 1 Kd3

•••

b6?

variation: 7 N Nxf3 + 8 Bx d5 9

Aready in timepressure, it was

exd exd5 Now oows 1 0 .5. . 00. Re R e 8,Now, an and, ion f 1 11 0c3 c 3N, eth2,enfoow 1 1 . . s. N e 4 ! 1 2 c x d 4 Q h4 + 1 3 g3 N xg xg3 1 4 hxg3 Qxg3 + 1 5 Kf Qxf3 Qxf3 + and wins. If,, on 1 1 . . . Ne4, Whit If Whitee repie pies 12 Bxe4, then 12 ... Qh4+. A this,s, Kere thi Keress had to thi think nk out h hen en deiberating over his 6th move. It woud have been better if he had occupied himsef with a dynamic investigati inves tigation on of the position posi tion befo before re his 5th move: he then, most ikey, woud not have made it.

not possibe thee tens th thumany ens of variat var iatio ions ns to af aftecacuate r 11 ... Nb4+ 12 Kc4. Nevertheess it is cear that it is not quiet deveopment which is in the spirit of the positi po sition, on, but an immediate immediate expoiexpoitati ta tion on of the th e dang dangerou erouss position posit ion of the Whi White te king king by me mean anss of of 1 1 . . . Nb4+.  cour course, se, i t was was possibe to to make a mistake in conducting the attack, particuary in timetroube, and ose. However, such considerations ought not intrude upon chess thought and inuence it.

6

•••

Bxg 7 Rxgl Nfg4 8 d4

This move is made in accordance with the requirements of the position, but reuctanty. 8

. . . 

2 Be3

Of cour course se,, White's posi position tion now is consideraby better.

Qh4+ 9 Kd2

2

•••

Bb7 3 Qf4?

8  

Chess Mle Mlegame game Com Combinatio binations  ns 

After this Black obtains good chances of a draw. He should play  3 Rae Rae  , and and not ter terri ribl blee is 3 . . . Nb4+ Nb4 + 1 4 Kd2 Bxe Bxe44  5 Bf Bf4 d5 , and White wins by continuing now eithe eit herr 1 6 Nxd5 or or  6 Nxe4 dxe4  7 Rxe4+. 3  Ba6+ 4 Kd2 f4 5 Bxf4 Nxd4 Nxd4  6 Bxc7 Nx Nxb3 b3 +  7 axb3 Bb7 and the game, in the end, finished in a draw

A few more words about the birth of of a variation. variatio n. It is born born with wit h its first move, but, if it is limited to just this move, it is to a certain extent discredited. There ought not be onemove variations. ome reply for the opponent can be foreseen, on the basis of the spirit of the position,

you come across a position which you assess ass ess as favou favourable rable for yourself yourse lf,, then this also clearly serves as a basis to begin carrying out at the board a variation, thought out mentally, and making an end of any further calculation of it. We examine the following short game, which is instructive instruc tive fro from m the point of view of the consequences arising as a result resu lt of a mistake mis take in the calculation of a variation. Kings ndian Defence

White: MFp Black: Lzabo (Amsterdam 1956)

I c4 Nf6 2 Nc3 g6 3 e4 d6 4 d4 Bg7 5 f4 c5 6 d5

Practice and contemporary contemporary theothe ory, in this old variation, recom-

but, if that' that'ss the way you will have have

mends 9 N here. Whether this

it, then it istopossible to plana twoone more move al already ready obtain move variation. If, however, a player succeeds, with a certain degree of of probabi probabilility ty,, in ffooreseeing reseeing a reply to his second move move,, then we are already talking about a threemove variation. In this way, sometimes are are created created mult mu ltiimove move variations which, at the same time, are not combinations. Usually the calculation of a variation ceases, ceases, when, even with a smalll degre smal degreee of probabilit probabil ity, y, it is not possible to foresee the opponent's reply, or when when too many many variations variat ions appear, which are simply too diicult to cope with mentally. If If,, in the th e proce process ss of deliberation,

continuation is better it is for the present toothan soonothers, to say. 6 0  0 7 N e6 8 Be2 exd5 9 exd5 ex d5 Re8 Re8  0 00 00 Ng4 Ng4 •••

ensing the weakness of the black squares, d4, e3 (the spirit of the position), zabo wants "to take the bull by the hos hos and, without wi thout completing his development, begins a headlong attack on White's darksquared territory in the centre. However, it is to Black's misfortune, that his calculation f the variation proves to be inaccurate. Black should increase his pressure in the the centr centree by mea means ns of  0 . . . a6  1 a4 b6 b6 an and th then . . . Ra7e7. Ra7e7.   Re 

It is clear that White sees the 82

 

Chess Mleg Mlegame ame Comb Combnat nations  ions 

bishop check on d4, and, obviously, has carefully looked at its consequences. Black should take into account this side of the question and not hope, without any basis, that White has "missed his 3th move.

1 1 . . . Bd B d4 + ?

A serious mistake mistake i n calculation. calculation .

Back resigned. f  9 . . . Qh  + then 20 Kf2 Qxa 

2  B.

The variation finds its reection at the board during the course of the game game , whereas "the spirit spir it of the position is reflected only in the thoughts of a player. The chess game,, from game from beginn begi nning ing to end, consc onsists of variations, consequently the creative thought of a chessplayer is mainly concentrated upon variationns  it crea tio create tess them them and and puts puts them into practice at the board. Unfortunately, we see, in all the games which we have looked at, that variations, making up the practical process of the struggle, illustrate only the lesser part of the

By c onti ontinui nuinng   . . . Nh6, Nh6, with with the the intention of making his way to d4

creativity of the player. A signifi cant part of the variatio variations, ns, which

with alright. the knight, still feel On Black 2 Bd3,might a good r ep ly w o u l d be  2 . . . BfS , or  2 . . . a6 3 Ne4 NfS. Now, however, Black quickly loses.

have beenofthought out,if remains the secret its author, it does not find its reflection later on in analytical investigations and commentaries. However, even in print, prin t, it is diicult to reflect the full content of creative thought. thought. f a player sets himself this aim, then fr each game he would have to write a whole book. Variaions require very great effort of thought and 80 90% of the time, allocated to the players, is spent on them. There are chessplayers who do not like li ke to go deep deeply ly into variations variat ions in which they content themselves mainly with onemove, in the last case twomove, variations. With such an approach to the process of

2 Nxd4 cxd4 3 Qxd4

This calm capture of the sacrificed pawn probably surprised or confused zabo. Most likely, he assumed that Filip would go in for 3 NbS Ne3 4 Bxe3 dxe3.  3 ... Qh4 Qh4

 3 . . . Nxh2 would be re reffuted by the reply 4 fS. 4 Bd2 Qxh2+

Black has not lost anything, but 6 Bxg4 is threatened ( af afte terr Kf   5 Kfl Na6 6 Bxg4 Bxg4 7 e4 e 4R Rxe xe4 4  8 Rxe Rxe4 4 Nc5 Nc5  9 R Re3 e3 !

83  

Chess Mdle Mdlegame game Combi Combiatio ations  ns 

play, the thoughts of a chessplayer inevitably pass by many creative values and possibilities, concealed in various middlegame positions. The creativity of a chessplayer, with this sort of tendency, will never be fullvalue and will never attract the attention of the m milillions lions of chess amateurs. A variation, or variations, sometitimes mes leads the thoughts of a player

The simplest example of dierent evaluations is served by the many games in which one of the opponents sacrifices material ( usually oone ne or or two pawns  see the the above game Forgac ForgacsT sTartakover) , considering that the positional advantage, obtained after the sacrifice, fully compensates for the material loss. The other side accepts the sacrifice, considering the

a long way. A new position, positio n, arising from a variation, is sometimes many moves away from the position standing at the board. There are certain cases when combinations separate the two positions by 1 5 or more more mov moves. es. It is obvious that the new position, which presents itself

reverse,not namely thatdue the positional opponent does obtain compensation fo for the lo loss ss incurred. incur red. It will often be the case that both partners are in error and only the further process of the struggle or a deep analysis of its critical moments can reeal if one of the oppoo pponents is right.

mentally, also requires a certain evaluation. The variation begin beginss to

The position, which is obtained upon the completion of the varia-

be out on the board when thiscarried evaluation satisfies, relatively, both oppon opponents. ents. This will happen, when the new position subjectively pleasess them both or when please wh en one of the players players makes a mistake in i n evaluation by overestimating or underestimating its individual factors, or finally, when the assessment is very complicated and contains quite a few pluses and minuses for both sides. There will also be cases when a decisive role in an evaluation is played by the creative style of the player. player. Upon a combination, combinatio n, the suborsubordinate side willynilly has to go in for a position which is unsatisfactory for him.

tion, we The call question the postvariation position. arises what connection there is between the spirit of a position and the postariation ealuation. On the face of it, both concepts are absolutely identical, in fact this is not quite so. The evaluation of the postvariation position will usually be wider in i n scope, scope, but more superf superfici icial al in the inherent comprehension of it . The spirit of of a posi position tion  this is its core, "the main thing". A number of secondary characteristics of the position are not taken into account when determining the spirit of it. The spirit of a position directs thoughts to the creatie path of producing variations. The 184

 

Chess Mlega Mlegame me Combat Combatns  ns 

postvaaton poston, on the other hand, completes the variation and, at times, also the game. Figuratively speaking it is possible to say that if the spiri s piritt of the positition on serves, serves, as i t were, were, as the th e source source of the variation, then the postvari va riat atio ionn positio positionn  is its its lowe lowerr reach. It is not the spirit of the posi po sition, tion, but the evaluation evalu ation of of the postvariation po stvariation position which helps

and long, merge in the thoughts of a chessplayer, or at least ought to merge int a single stream, logically developing and presenting itself as the realisation of a single plan, or several plans, logically connected and merging with each other. We define this statement more preciely with a few illustrations.

to make pu pos u l . The spirit of avariations of post postio ionn  pur thisrposef is efu a settingo point, the postvariation position  this isis the co concl clus usio ion, n, the result of great eort of thought. The postvariation position ceases to be such when it has been achieved. Then already, deliberating on the future future,, the player pl ayer endea-

talian White: Game A.Aekhine

Black:

.Taasch

(Mannheim 1914)

1 e4 eS 2 NO Nc6 3 Bc4 BcS 4 c3 Qe7 S d4 Bb6 Bb 6 6 0 0 d6 7 a4 The aim (technical)  to evoke,

on Black's side, the advance of the apawn, which virtuall vir tuallyy forces orces him hi m

vours to determine its signiicance, thee main th mai n thin thingg in in it i t . Thus Thus any any posiposi -

to exchange exchange on e3 afte afterr Be3. Be3 . White Wh ite is now threatening threatening to win a pie piece: ce: 8

tion, it thoughts were, passes twice throughas the of a player: once as the creative sum of thinking out, the second time as a startingpoint. The number of evaluated postvariation positions in the course of a game will be dierent. Usually postvariation positions are connected to one another with a logical thread (mainly serving as the spirit of the position), consequently the thoughts of a player pass through a number of positions posi tions , not by fits and starts, each time revealing completely new positions, but consecutively, fluently. All positions and threadvariations, great and small, short

dBxa 5 Na Na5 B9d3Rxa or5 8Bxa5 a a 5Nxa5 N1 xa5 (8 Bxa5 5 95d59 )Bd3 Rxa5 Bxa 0 Qa Qa4 4 +. . .. 7

•••

a6

In accordance with the spirit of the Italian Game, both opponents have solved the opening problem well. The development for both White and Black is quite satisfactory, the centre is firm. This position represents the first postvariation position in the present game. Admittedly, the opponents arrived at it not by means of of imagiimag ination and calculation, but on the basis of familiarity with the theory of the Italian Game. n this quiet opening, White cannot lay claim to much, and Black usually manages to retain equality. 185

 

Chess Mle Mlegame game Comb Combinations  inations 

Here is an example of how both sides strive for a definite position (in the present case theoretical), going for one and the same variation.

 Be3

On th the one one hhan andd  this this ccom om-pletes the mobilisation, on the other, however, it is a concrete

into White's calculation. Here we havee a diverg hav dive rgence ence in te evalua eva luation tion of the posi positition on.. Black fforces orces a move which White considers useful for himself. Tarrasch possibly should also be censured for the fact that, resting on his 40 years experience experience,, he limited himself to pure statics, without taking some pains to expose the position to a dynamic interpretation. But the same charge could hardly levelled against Alekhine. Thebe variation, begun with the move 8 Be3, should be continued further ou see, Alekhine must have expected the reply 8 . . . Nf Nf6, 6, in so so fa farr as he censur censured ed the move move 8 . . . Bg4 Bg4 . We continue continue thee variati th variation: on: 8 . . . Nf6 Nf6 9 Nbd2 00 0 d5 Nd8 Nd8   a Bxe3 Bxe3  2 fxe3 fxe3 Ng4 Ng4

plan, pursuing the improvement of conditions on the king's ank.

3 Qe f5, and Black's position is qite promising.

White d5 Nd8has 0 inamind Bxe3the (orvariation 0 ... Ba79  1 Bxa7 Rxa Rxa 7, and the the lack lack roo rookk is in a poor poor position) 1  fxe3 xe3.. The The present postvaaton position might win White's fa favour, vour, but thi thiss calculation does not include Black's 8th move, and this circumstance, as will be seen later, has a certain significance.

Wewhich give this position, didpostvariation not occur due t Tarrasch's mistake



••

Bg4

Alekhine censured this move, but the motive of his criticism ( weakening of of the b7 pawn) is unfounded ounded.. t is possible possib le that Tarrasch considered considered the locking lo cking of the centre favourable for himself and therefore forces the move d5, which, even without this, entered

The game might ave The a ve continued continu ed something like this: 3 exf5 Bxf5 4 Nh4 Bd7 5 Rxf8+ Qxf8 6 Qg3 and, thoug ite's iece are rather actively paced, e ha 86

 

Chess Mle Mlegame game C Combinati ombination on

more vulnerable points in his positionn than tio than Black. One might conjecture that, if Tarra arrasc schh had play p layed ed 8 . . . Nf6, Nf6, then,, afte then afterr 9 N bd2 0 0 1 0 d5 Nd8, Nd8 , Alekhine would have preferred simpl simplyy 1 1 h3 to the mo move 1 1 a . 9 d5 Nb

The naturl retreat, but strange as it may seem, the Black knight does not find itself a suitable position the future. t in would have been more farsighte sigh tedd ttoo play play 9 . . . Nd8, Nd8 , not fear fear-ing the attack on the b6 pawn, pawn , after after 1 0 Bx Bxb6 cx cxb6  it isis easily easily de de-fended. 10 a5 Bxe3

A lso not so bad bad for Black was was 1 0 ... Ba7 11 Bxa7 Rxa7. uper-

2 N Nb bd2 Nb Nbd7  3  l

Black has a diicult position. However if if he determined the the spirit spir it of the position and was able to subordinate his future play to it, then th en he could sti stillll have contended contended with the diiculties. Thee weak point in Th i n White's position is the e4 pawn. t is precisely here that Black's minor pieces ought to direct their blows. On the other hand, Black guardof the f5 square against themust invasion White Wh ite knight. The The mov movee . . . g6 was unsuitable for this, since then the f6 square would be dangerously weakened. Exploiting the open fle, White could deliver blows from all his heavy pieces on this square.

fici ficial ally ly,, the position posit ion of the rook on a 7 is not very aesthetic aesthet ic , and it has

All these considerations, taken together, also characterise the spi-

to (in due course)forto this returnloseto time a8, but in retu tempoo , Black does not allow White temp play on the ffile and obtains an objj ect ffoor attack, on this same line ob lin e , in the shape of the f4 square.

rit of to thelead present They ought Black position. to the conclusion that it is necessary to transfer the bisop to g6. Consequently, correct, and in the spirit of the position, would be to play now  3 . . . Bh5 

I I e e33 Nf6

N atural, atural , but not meeting the spirit of the position. The locked structue in the centre, which Black himself has provoked, provoked, requiress dynamic re dynamic play pl ay fr from him hi m with wi th the movee . . . f5 mov f5 . t was possible possible to to begi beginn this, both both immediately immediately and and afte afterr 1 1 ... Nh6. Black is simply making a move which completes his development. uch onemove variation play must, sooner or later, be punished.

The variation arises, 3 ... B5 87

 

Chess Che ss M Mleg legame ame Com Comba bation tions  s 

14 Nh4 Bg6 15 Nf5 (15 Nxg6 hxg6 hx g6 or . . . fxg6 were, were, of course, course, favoura avourable ble only for Black) 15 . . . Bxf5 1 6 Rxf5 Ng4 Ng4  1 7 Qg Qg33 g6 g6 1 8 R h5 19 h3 Nh6, and Black's position is quite solid. If, howeve however,r, White does not play 14 Nh4, Black, all the same, transfers the bishop to g6 and White has to worry about the defence of the e4 pawn.

variation) position? Alekhine was pleased with this posi position tion ffoor sure. 1 6 Nh4 Nh4

ee the annotation to the 21st move. 1 6 g6  7 Q Qee l 6 1 Nh NhfJ x xd5 1 9 exd5 exd5 

1 9 Bxd Bxd55 woul wouldd look attractive, attractiv e, if it we were re not not for for 1 9 . . . Nxd5 20 exd5 exd5 f5, and Black increases his influence in the centre. 

In addition this, the to bishop gives excellent toprotection the king's position. 13



N5?

A momentary attack. A move ater, the knight will be ignominiously driven d riven back. back. 14 Qb ?

It is clear that, also now, he

1 9Otherwise e4 it is not possible to

bring the queen'sside pieces out of imprisonment. 20 Ng5 h6 h6 2 1 Nh3 Qe Qe5 ?

Tarrasch Incomprehensible does not exploit the last chance to bring the queen's flank into play. The roo rook, k, bish bishop op and knight  and and

shouldd play shoul play . . . Bh5. The bishop bishop goes into voluntary imprisonment,

this is a great great force  now now remain, remai n, to the end of the game, game, apathetic witwit -

from it isend destined not emergewhich until the of the togame. At the same same time ti me it also locks in the rook.

nesses of did theTcatastrophe. What variations variati ons arrasch arrasch calculate calcu late in making his queen move? Probably none whatsoever. whatsoever. It was enough enough to see the thremove variation which occurs in the game and he would have avoided the position promised him, "where his eyes are looking. Meanwhile, after 21 ... Ne5, the struggle might still have assumed a rather stubbo character. Alekhinee giv hin gives es thi thiss vari variat atio ion: n: 2  . . . Ne5 Ne5 22 Nf4 Nf4 Bf Bf5 2233 h3 h5 24 Bb3 Rc8 25 c4, followed by Ne2d4, with the better position for White, but, as Alekhine wrote, without obvious possibilities of quickly exploiting it. This is not quite so simple. For

15  Nd7

Is it possible that Tarrasc, in makingg his 1 3 th move, had chosen makin this postvariation (a threemove 188  

Chess Che ss M leg legam amee Co Combi mbia atio tions  ns 

exampe, Back, on 25 c4, coud repy h4, and, if 26 Ne2, then 26 . . . Nd3 Nd3 27 Qb1 Qb1 NhS , deve deveo opi ping ng an initiative. It seems that, even earier, Aekhine payed insuicienty concretey, not foreseeing the und under ermi mini ning ng 1 7 . . . c6. Was it not better, instead of 16 Nh4, which aready ooks too direct, to pay p ay 16 B Bdd3 , so as, as, on 1 6 . . . c6, to continue 17 c4, not etting out Back's Back 's piec pNg4 ieces es on the th e queen's ank. ank . 22 R Aso this is a onemove variation. 23 Nf4 g5

Now White aso expoits the f5 square.  interest interesting ing idea i dea  2 3 . . . Ndff6, and if 24 h3 , then Nd then 24 . . . g5 25 hxg4 Nxg4.

One more short game. Budapest Gambit

White: A.Rubinstein Back: .Tartakover (Bad issinen 1928)

1 d4 N N 2 c4 c4 e5 3 dxe5 Ng4 Ng4 4 Bf4

Rubinstein iked this move, whereas Aekhine conducted his attack by 4 e4 N xe5 5 f4 f4 . However, White's pawnanenergy, ene rgy, in thisoss variavariof ation, suers appreciable power if Back arms himself with the foowin oowingg continua continuation: tion: 5 . . . N5 c6 6 Be3 Be3 N a6! 7 Nc3 Bc Bc55 8 Qd2 d6 9 N 00 1 0 Bd3 Bd3 Bx Bxe3 e3 1 1 Qxe3 Nc5 with good pay for Back. The game, RudakovskyRatner (14th UR Championship, Mo-

scow 1945), continued further: 12 Bc2 Nb4 13 000 Nxc2 14 Kxc2 Re88 1 5 Rhe1 Re Rhe1 Bd Bd77 16 e5 b6 1 7 Kc dxe5 18 fxe5 Qc8 19 Qg5 h6 20 Qg3 Qa6 21 Rd4 Bf5 and Back obtains a very dangerous attack.

24 h3 Ng

Aso now, now, he shou shoud d con contin tinue ue . . . Ndf6. Paying for the win of the pawn is so ir ireparabe, eparabe, j ust as as many other thoughts of Tarrasch arrasch in this game. 25 Ne2 Nxd5 26 Bxd5 Qxd5 27 Nd4 Qe5

4

•••

Bb4+ 5 Nd2 Nc6 6 Nf3 

This is undoubtedy more in the spirit of the position than winning back ba ck the pawn pawn:: 6 . . . Qe 7 7 e3 Ngxe5 Ng xe5 8 Be2 Be2 00 9 00, 00, and, if 9 . . . d6, then 1 0 Nb3 with w ith a3 to foow. Proba robab byy 9 . . . Bxd2 Bxd2 1 0 Qxd Qxd22 d6 d6 is more acceptabe for Back here. Aso after this, Rubinstein preferred White's game, but it seems the main reason fo for this assessment was White's "two bishops.

Back does not have the move 27 . . . Ne5 , bec bec ause ause of of the the rep repyy 2 8 c 4  in this ies his misf misfortun ortune. e. On 2 7 . . . Nf8, Aekhine had intended to pay 28 Qe2, with the threat of Nc4. Back must ose. 28 Nc4 Qd5 29 Nf5! K 30 Nd6 N d6 Rh7 3 1 Rdl Qc6 32 Rd Rd4 4 b5 33 axb6 Bb7 34 Na5 Back resigned.

A stormy finae for such an unpretentious opening as the Itaian Game.

7 exf6 Qxf6 8 g3 Qxb2 9 Bg2 d6 10 0 0

189  

Chesss Mdleg Ches Mdlegame ame Combin Combinations  ations 

moves as 10 . . . h6, h6, 10 . . . B, or 10 . . . Bf5 ( as occu occurred, rred, and led to to a successful result, in one of the games of the "side touament at Bad Kissingen). II Nb3

 0 ... 00

o as to towith final finally lythe "get "get busy, busy , in real eaest, middlegame, which was not to be particularly recommended with wi th the king in i n the centre. None the less Black is rushing. The struggle has already a lready assumed a character of such a kind that not

Rubinstein immediately exploits Rubinstein the opponent's too "reflex move and places Black's bishop on b4 in an uncomfortable position. Now, for example, it is already not pofossi ssibl e to t1o. pl play 1 1 . . . B , in view view 1 2ble & I I ... 6 6  2 N Ngg5 h6 h6

1 2 . . . B iiss not pos possibl sible, e, in view view of 13 Ne4; but it is hardly advisable to thrust back the knight to a square where it is heading for itself and where its position, in fact, is not

only allows, but also demands a deep penetration into the position and its spirit. Black's bishop is isolated on b4, andd there comes a moment when an wh en it it is necessary to decide the question of its futur futuree participati pa rticipation. on. If White succeeds in playing Nb3, its position could become precarious. Therefore Black should think out several continuations, with which he might improve impro ve the general general positons of his pieces on the queen's ank. The queen also also has, perhaps, travelled too far away. Black's castling  is objectively objectively a us usef eful ul mov movee , but is, as it were, outside the requirements of the position and does not take into account the concrete "main thing at the present moment of the struggle. It would be better to cast his attention attent ion on such such

very pleasant for Black. It was necessary to consider the move 1 2 . . . Bf Bf5 , ssoo as, on 13 e4, e4, to examine exam ine the the continuat continuation ion 13 . . . h6 ( 1 3 . . . Bd Bd77 is dang danger erou ouss , beca becaus usee of the reply 14 e5! and, whichever of Black's knights takes the pawn, White obtains, in the inal account, a material advantage. For example: 1 ) 14 . . . Ng Ngxe5 xe5 15 a3 a 3 Bc5 Bc 5 16 Nxc5 Nxc5 dxc5 dx c5 1 7 Bd Bd55 + K Khh8 18 Nxh 7 ! 2) 14 . . . Ncx Ncx e 5 1 5 h3 N Nh6 h6 16 a3 a3 Bc55 1 7 N xc Bc xc55 dxc dxc5 1 8 Ne4 ! winnwinning either the knight e5 or the bishop d7). After 1 3 . . . h6 1 4 exf5 hxg hxg55 1 5 Qxg44 gxf Qxg gxf4 1 6 Bd5 + Kh8 1 7 Qxf Qxf4 Qxf5 18 Qh4+ Qh7 19 Qxh7+ Kxh 7 , would b e obtained a postvariation position, which is not easy to evaluate. 190

 

Chess Mdlegame Mdlegame Comba Combations  tions 

We can only say that the present position would be more acceptable for Black than that which actually occu oc currs in the the game game after 1 2 . . . h6. 13 Ne4 Q 4 a3 Ba5 15 Nxa5 Nxa5 6 h3! Ne5 O co cour ursse not 1 6 . . . Nf Nf66 1 7

the whole board cannot resist for long. 9

 

hxg5 20 Bxa5 Bxa5 Be6 2  Bc3 Bc3

The blacksquared a1h8 diagonal is fatal. It now expresses the spirit of the po positi sition. on. 2  Nc6 22 2 2 Qd2 Q d2 5 2 3 g4 g 4 4 4 24 Bxd Bxd55 ! Bxd5 Bxd5 25 2 5 Qxd5 Qxd5 + Kh7 

Nxf6+ Qxf6 18 Qd5+xa5. In considering his 12th move Tartakover should shou ld have hav e foreseen and evaluated the position which

Of cou courrse als alsoo 25 . . . Rf7 26 e3 Q3 27 Qxg5 + leads to Blacks quick downfall.

occurs He foresee should have but probablynow. did not it.

26 3 27 Qxg5 Qxh3 28 Qg7e3mate.

Black was careless twic twicee  on the the 10th and 12th moves. This was enough to be mated on the 28th move. This happened because Black made a mistake in the first element

of thinking not understanding that the spirit of the position was determined by the unfortunate position of had the bishop on b4. If T artakover correctl correctly y understood the essence of the position after the 10th and 12th moves he would undoubtedly have directed his thoughts along the variations given in the annotations to these moves. Hence one can draw the conclusion that ignoring the spirit of the position or misreading the essence of it involves a "fall into the second element of thinking  thee ev th evalu aluation ation of the the postv postvaria ariation tion position. positio n. You see to play not in the spirit of of the the position position  this mean meanss going along a not exactly logical path. However upon considering an incorrect variation variat ion a player sil s illl has the possibility extending into

17 c5! g5 8 Bd2 d5

Tartakover h imself imse lf pointed out the continuation 18 ... Nb3 19 B ! Nxa N xa 1 2 0 cxd6 cxd6 as favo avoura urabl blee for White. Indeed Black would have ha ve lost lost quickly quickly both both af after 20 . . . cxd6 cx d6 2 1 N xd6 and and also also in the event event of 20 ... Nd7 21 Bxa1 with the threats of Nxg5 and Qd4. However also the continuation chosen by Black finds a dangerous retort. 9 Nxg5!

The king's position is exposed and Black even without this preoccupied with wi th he unsatisfac unsat isfactory tory st stat atee of his his forces orces  scattered over 191  

Chess Mdle Mdlegame game C Combat ombatns  ns 

the postvariation evaluation i.e. glancing ignomin ignominiousl iouslyy into the future of sensing his ture hi s  for tthe he presen presentt only mental mistake in the first element of thinking. Indeed Indee d this is so but only only upon upon the condition that in the variation he foresees strong replies by the opponent. If Tartakover Tartakover had forese oreseen en Rubinstein's 1 1 th move Nb3 he would not have played 10

the position. Thus at times the variation varia tion acts as material helping to determine the spirit of the position and this means that the second element of thinking should sometimes occupy in a player's thoughts a place before the irst. In conclusion we examine one more game. This time we tr to give our annotations an educa-

. . . 00. i s possibl osBlack's siblee to 1say s2th ayhexa emove. xact ctly ly the sameItabout 2t m ove. If Tartakover in considering the variation had seen White's 1 7th move c5 he would have rejected 1 2 . . . h6. h6. From From thi thiss ffollow ollowss a highly important conclusion the main point of which is that the spir spiritit of

tional chuparacter in has this been way to sumcharacter a little soallasthat said. Ki's ndian Defence

White: M.Taimanov Black: ABannik 25th USSR Championship

the position (the first element of thinking) and the variation (the second element of thinking) mutually mutu ally control control one another and in this mutualcontrol preeminence belongs to the variation. Where the essence of the position is more or less clear thought easily finds moves and variations ensuing from it. When however diicultie dii cultiess arise in determining the main thing in the position and a period of doubt and hesitation approaches then a variation and variations must as it were go to the assistance of the player's thoughts. In such cases the variation supplements your search for thee "core of the th the posit pos ition ion with wi th new material possibly playing a decisive role in the preliminary evaluation i . e . in maste masteri ring ng the spirit spirit of of

(Ria 1958

1 c 4 Nf Nf6 2 d4 g 6 3 Nc3 Bg7 4 e4 d6 S f3 eS 6 Nge2 Nc6 7 dS Ne7 8 Be3 cS 9 g4

With the aim of opening the gilile e aft after er Black Black plays . . . f5  a move move without which Black suocates in the "ing's Indian middlegame.

9



S

uch a "rapidire tactical attack a type of intermediate play 192

 

Chess Mlegam Mlegamee Combat Combatns  ns 

might also be permissible be permissible, , but when it produces, if only anonly insignificant, but nevertheless positive result, and when it does not contradict the spirit of the position. We have already mentioned, in the previous note, that the main task for Black is to oppose the White wedge, c4d5e4, by ... f5. In this also lies l ies the spirit spir it of examinexami n-

actually diicultno to sense do this. Now, there is already in Black playin pla yingg 1 1 . . . f6. Both oth after 1 2 h4 h4 and also also 1 2 gx gxff6 , follow ol lowed ed by an an attack on the g6 square. White, amongs amo ngstt all the the other things, would also obtain a position position which is ful fulll of initiative on the king's flank. Black's last move is nevertheless not bad, and the positive side to it lilies es in tthe he fact that he takes under under

ing the...position. move f5 and, Byin rejecting addition,thea quick execution execution of itit  this mean meanss not understanding the spirit of the position, letting White dominate the centre without a struggle, and also the queen's ank, where White has the possibility of an at-

control the possible b5 square andthreat eliminates the White of Nb5. As soon becomes clear, Black Bla ck mak makes es the the move . . . a6 as prep pr epar aratio ationn for . . . b5 , i . e. an impracticable measure. This, of course, is also an incorrect appreciation of the spirit spir it of the position. positi on.

tack (b4). Not understanding all thisis,, Blac th Bl ackk embarked on a confus confused ed variation without a startingpoint and, as a result, quite soon went downhill. Meanwhile Black's play would have been clear if he had penetrated penetrat ed the essence of the the postpost opening situation situa tion and proceeded in this th is way way : 9 . . . 00 0 0 1 0 Ng3 Ng3 Ne8! Ne 8!   Rg  f5 f5 1 2 gxf5 gx gxf5 1 3 NhS f4 f4 1 4 Bf2 Ng6, and, though Black is cramped, he has prospects of developing active play on the queen's ank by ... b5. White, however, despite the open gle, does not have a particularly great amount of space.

Black should resort to complicated manoeuvres,, the aim of manoeuvres of which must be to to meet White's attack, b4, b4 , with all his weapons; furthermore, o a4, he should have th the mov move . . . a . On bxc5 he should have ready not onll y . . . bx on bxcc 5 , but but als alsoo . . . d x c 5 ( ! ) and finally, as a blow on the other ank, an k, he should should prepar preparee . . . f6 f6 . n concrete terms, these manoeuvres might take the form of the moves . . . Bd 7 , . . . Nc N c 8, . . . b6, b6, . . . Bf8, aannd . . . Be 7 . 2 Qd2 R8

till, come what may. You see, afte af terr . . . b6, this pa pawn might nee needd defence.

1 0 g5 Nh Nh7 I I Nc1 a6

 3 R R l !

As also might be expected, expected, Black begins to hurl himself from one thought to another and cannot work out a purposeful plan. It is

White makes a correct appreciation of the position, its spirit, and launches launc hes a quick and very very ene enegeti geticc attack on the the queen's ank, against agains t 93

 

Chess Mleg Mlegame ame Comba Combatns  tns 

which Black is defenceless. If anything can come to his rescue now then th en it is i s only a decisiv deci sivee counterattack ta ck on the the king's king's flank flank after  3 . . . 00 and and . . . f6. Instea Insteadd of of this he makes a hopeless attempt to parry the onslaught of White's superior forces on the queen's flank. In the present game the first element of thinking was for Black in full disarray. •••

 3Obviously b6 4 b4 in Rb7 order to defend himse him self lf agai agains nstt  5 bxc5. bxc5.  4 . . . Bd 7

leads to the same aim but this does not change matters very much. 5 a4 Nf8

After 1 5 . . .   6 bxa5 bxa5 bxa5 bxa5  the the a pawn would be doomed to die.

with wi th on onee of the the fforts orts  the the b6 pawn pawn.. White's thoughts now are fully occupied with variations. There remains only for him to carefully and accurately calculate them which in the present positio posit ion n is nnot ot partipart icularly diicult to do. 6 ... cxb4 7 Rx4 xa5 8 Rx7 Bxb7 9 c5 bxc5 20 N3 Nd7 2  Na4 Na4 00 22 Nxa5 Nxa5

White's four minor pieces ogether with queen sma smash sh up the the opponent's oppone nt's literally que en's flank. This part of the game makes a big impression. 22 ... Ba8 23 Bxa6 

Now this move which was the breath of life for Black after 9 g4 only redoubles his misfortune in-

deed even the aim of it is not apparent. The open ffile equally gives Black nothi nothing ng  this is very very easy to see while even he undermining of White's powerful wedge is practically impossible and ought not even to have found itself included in Black's range of vision. visi on. Interesting is T aianov's reaction to this move in his annotaio annotaionn . He writes "The pr prove overb rb  beer beer late than than never never  is not applicable applicable in the present case. Black is 2 moves late with the move ... f5 and now this counterchance does not achieve its objective. Thus writes Taimanov but generally speaking what objective we repeat can we talk about and wha exactly (what thought) indued Black to decide upon the advance of this pawn? But meanwhile is

Black endeavours to transfer the king's knight to the queen's flank. Now of course it is not a matter for the spirit spir it of the position positi on since since  to a large extent he is subjected to thee w th wililll of of the the opponent opponent who who seizes seize s the initiative.

6 a! O course he goes for a storm-

ing purposeful attack on the cS square. To this end he does away 94  

Chess Mleg Mlegame ame Co Combinatio mbinations  ns 

pearance negative role of dangerous is striking."holes The apon e6 and g6 when there is a direct road fo for the Whi W hite te knight knigh t to the e6 square. uch statements of critics and commentators and, now and then, even the author himself, sometimes graphic graphically ally bring to light causes which are desperate, etc. uch reasons might serve as more than sufficient evidence that disorder in thinking whichof sets in for chessplayers during the game and about which whi ch we speak furt further her at the beginningg of beginnin of the chapter. chapter . It further further interprets patently bad moves as those which are "just as bad as anything else. This also is not serious serious..

qu quit theeiteemove th mo tove the the 23 point poin. . t. tof5 f5 say s, ayit"better "bette would r late b than never. 26 ... N8 27 Nb3

The knight knigh t heads heads for e6, e6 , and it is not possible to prevent this. 27 ... .. . 4 28 Nb Nb5 5 Nx5 Nx5 29 2 9 Nx5 Nx5 Qe8 Qe 8 30 Ral Ra l Nd6 Nd6 3  Ne6 Ne6 B Bb7 b7 32 32 Qb4 B 33 B5 Rxe6

Otherwise there is no saving the piece. pie ce. If 33 . . . Qd7, then then 34 34 Ra 7 34Black dxe6continued Q6 35 R the game up to

the 44th move. We would like to furthermore turn our attention attentio n to the following ol lowing:: Whereas Bannik began to lose conf co nfid iden ence ce afte afterr the the move move 9 . . . h5 , his thoughts parting with logic and

If the fact of the matter is that "once a wedge, always a wedge then one should simply stop the gamee . Black also had available here gam thee mov th movee 23 . . . Qb8 Qb8 , whic whichh is unundoubte dou btedly dly better better than than 23 . . . f5 .  Worth con consid sideri ering ng is als alsoo 23 23 . . . Nc8.

inally becoming confused, Taimanov's thinking thinkin g was was distinguished disti nguished by harmony, clarity and logic. This indicates not the personal qualities of the opponents, but the character of the proceeding struggle. Throughout the whole game, Taimanov held the initiative and he had freewill, whereas the will of Bannik found itself, to a greater or lesser extent, subordinate to the continuous threats and attacks of the opponent. Thinking frequently loses its harmony, systematic character and logic for that opponent who falls under the initiative or attack. This explains why approximately 80% of oversights, miscalculations cula tions and "blunders "blunders fal falll to the lot of the defender. defender. During Dur ing the opponent's ntate, particularly when it bears a protracted cha

24 6 Rx Rx6 2 5 Be2

And that's all! The ffile is rendered harmless, White's wedge is immovable, while Black's whole position, together with the two lockedin bishops, represents allround weakness. Generally speaking, if we compare the roles of White's minor pieces and Black's (and you see these are the water of life in an attack), then commentary becomes unneccessary. 25 . . . Q 26 0 0

But here here , unlike unl ike the the comment to to 95  

Chess Mleg Mlegame ame Com Comb bat ato o

racter, the defending side finds himself hims elf under under pressure of the threat t hreat of loss loss  this this also a lso weaken weakenss discipline discipl ine of thought and prevents due presence of mind to counter and overcome the diiculties arising. To conclude, conc lude, let us sum up all that has been said about the thinking of a chessplayer during the process of play: A variation arises from a posi

tion, a position arises from a variation and it is necessary to see this interdependency in its logical, meaningful sense. elffdiscipline el discipline of th thou ough ghtt !  this is the slog s logan an which we place alongside the slogan slogan  Desi Desirre for the the iniini tiative! which we proclaimed in Middlegame Planning.

It is not diicult to see how both slogans are organically connected.

196

View more...

Comments

Copyright ©2017 KUPDF Inc.
SUPPORT KUPDF