Charge.doc

PROJECT R EPORT EPORT

PRINCIPLES OF

FRAMING OF

CHARGES

SUBMITTED SUBMITTED BY: MS. ABHISHEK  S  SINGLA

TO:

SANGITA

BHALLA

R O LL NO.-04/08

SE -VIII MESTER -VIII

Principles of Framing of Charges

Page I

INDEX ACKNOLEDGMENT.......................................................................................................II TABLE OF CASES.............................................................................................................III INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................! MEANING OF CHARGE......................................................................................................" HAT CHARGE CONTAINS AND ALTERATION OF CHARGE..............................................# JOINDER OF CHARGES......................................................................................................4 CONVICTION OF AN OFFENCE NOT CHARGED HEN SUCH OFFENCE IS INCLUDED IN OFFENCE CHARGED...........................................................................................................$

ITHDRAAL OF REMAINING CHARGES ON CONVICTION ON ONE OF SEVERAL CHARGES............................................................................................................................$

FRAMING OF CHARGE.......................................................................................................!0 BIBLIOGRAPHY.................................................................................................................IV

~Code of Criminal Procedure~

Principles of Framing of Charges

Page II

ACKNOLEDGMENT

I would like to thank our Honorable teacher Dr. Sangita Bhalla, for without her valuable guidance, constant encouragement and detailed approach would not have made it possible for  me to make a proper research for the topic- Principles of raming of !harges. Her pr"cised e#amples, detailed descriptions and enthusiastic approach made m$ efforts to flourish in a right direction. %he work contained herein is an amalgamation of the remarkable work of various authors and I am thankful to them for their publications that have helped me prepare this research paper to the best of m$ abilities.

~Code of Criminal Procedure~

Principles of Framing of Charges

Page III

TABLE OF CASES 

 Aftab Ahmad  Khan %. State of  Hyderabad  AIR !$&4 SC 4#'



 Amar  Singh %. State AIR !$&4 P()* !0'



 B.N. Srikantiah %. State of Mysore



 Babulal  %. Emperor  AIR !$#8 PC !#0



 Banamali Tripathy %. Emperor  AIR !$4# P+, "!"



 Bhimbadhar Pradhan %. S,+,  O122+ AIR !$&' SC 4'$



 Birihh Bhuian %. State of Bihar  AIR !$'# SC !!"0



!handrama Prasaa !haman 3!$&! ! C+5 &#$



!hittaran"an #as %. State of $.B. AIR !$'# SC !'$'

 

 Emperor  %. #haneshram AIR !$"6 N+7 ""# %.N.Kulkarni  %. State !$6# C1 LJ &&!



 &as'antrai Manilal Akhaney %. S,+,  B9+ AIR !$&' SC &6&



 K  Sat'ant  Singh %. State of  Pun"ab AIR !$'0 SC ""'



 Kantilal  %. State of  Maharashtra AIR !$60 SC #&$



 Kantilal  %. State of  Maharashtra AIR !$60 SC #&$



 Krishnan %. The State AIR !$&8 K $4



 Krishnan %. The State AIR !$&8 LJ &!'



 M.(. Menon %. Kerala S,+, !$6# C. LJ #$4



 Manna )al  %. State !$'6 C LJ !"6"



 Mathura Thakur  3!$0! ' CN 6"



 Moosa Abdul  (ahiman %. State of  Kerala !$8" C. LJ !#84 3K



 Nohar !hand  %. State of Pun"ab !$84 C. LJ 88' 3P;H



 (amalinga *dayar  %. Emperor  AIR !$"$ M+< "00



 (a+inder  Pal  Singh %. State of  Pun"ab "004 C1 LJ !#"" 3P;H



 Shyam Sunder Ker  %. State !$'0 C LJ #!0



 Sri (am ,arma %. State AIR !$&' A55 4''



 Sukha %. State of  (a"asthan AIR !$&' SC &!#



 Sura" Pal  %. State of -.P. AIR !$&& SC 4!$



Trilokhand  %. (e  AIR !$4$ A55 !86



-nion of /ndia %. Prafulla Kumar Samal  3"00" " SCC !#&



$a0ir Singh %. Emperor  AIR !$4" O(here an accused person is charged, along with others under Section ?9@*/0 and ?@*/0 of  the Indian Penal !ode but the others are ac'uitted and the accused alone is convicted under  Section ? and ?9, the absence of specific charges against the accused under Section ? and ?9, is a ver$ serious lacuna in the proceedings and it materiall$ preAudices the accused and his conviction for those cannot be maintained. 1 In Musa Khan v. State of Maharashtra the