qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbn mqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcv bnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzx cvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjkl The Jamaican Peasantry in the 19th Century zxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghj CAPE Caribbean History- Unit 1 klzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfg hjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasd fghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopa sdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuio pasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyu iopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwert yuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwe rtyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmq wertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbn mqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcv bnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzx May/June 2015
Dianne-Lee Ferguson
Hypothesis
African Caribbean Peasantry could have singlehandedly revived the dying economies of the British West Indies between 1850 and 1900 if they were allowed to exist without planter hindrance.
You have the option of further narrowing your hypothesis to focus on Jamaica instead of the British West Indies if the scope of the information is too broad. As you progress through the body, please bear that in mind. You hypothesis would not change. I t would read in Jamaica between 1850 and 1900 rather than in the British West Indies between 1850 and 1900.
Introduction
According to William Roseberry peasants are persons who, by “owning or controlling land and resources, produce primarily agricultural crops for their own subsistence, but who also produce a surplus product, a portion of which is appropriated, directly or indirectly, by representatives of a larger economic system” (47). The peasantry emerged from the proto-peasantry which existed during the time of slavery. Before emancipation in 1834 the proto-peasantry had emerged from an attempt by the planters to save operational costs by allowing the slaves to produce their own food rather than to provide it directly for them. The slaves began to grow surplus and sold their produce in the markets. This context allowed the slaves to cultivate skills such as those required to engage in the market activities of selling and purchasing goods. Some slaves were able to buy their freedom from the profits gained through this enterprise. They were able to diversify the economy by providing a source for produce such as yam and sweet potato. This group formed the bulk of the peasantry of ex-slaves that developed after emancipation. Already capable of being self-sufficient, they were able to make a living through cultivation. Sidney Mintz, a Caribbean anthropologist, proposes that despite the attempts of slavery to isolate the individual in his hardship the Caribbean exslaves were still able to maintain ideas of collective activity or cooperative unity. This was exhibited through various economic practices which subsequently contributed to the economy. William Arthur Lewis attributes their economic contributions to the peasants’ determinacy to earn money to separate themselves from the plantation. Planters opposed the development of the peasantry due to consequent independence it would provide the slaves. Providing land for the slaves to cultivate would lead to a reduction of their labour force. Shortage of land hindered the development of the peasantry. Therefore some ex-slaves were forced to continue working on the plantation to support themselves. This was beneficial to the planters that would have fewer labourers to work on their plantations if not for the problem of land for the ex-slaves. To further encourage this, the planters would use various methods to prevent the peasants from obtaining land or land suitable for cultivation.
The assessment for the further potential of economic growth that the peasantry represented is critical due to the many contributions it made to the economy in its compromised state. An understanding of the possible contributions that the peasantry could have achieved as well as of those that they did in spite of the odds can lead to a further appreciation of the role they played in the development of the economies of the British West Indies. From the peasantry emerged the peasantry emerged the economic practices of credit unions and collective ownership. This research paper pursues evidence to show that the peasantry of the British West Indies could have further contributed to enhancing its failing economies if not for the opposition faced by the plantocracy in its attempt to preserve the profitability of sugar production after the emancipation of slaves and the subsequent apprenticeship period. Please be mindful of the word limit as you proceed. This is not bad for a first draft, however, you need to cite your sources more effectively, condense where necessary and make use of your footnotes. Please see IA examples.
Thank you for interesting in our services. We are a non-profit group that run this website to share documents. We need your help to maintenance this website.