BSA Antenna Theory - Mod
March 28, 2023 | Author: Anonymous | Category: N/A
Short Description
Download BSA Antenna Theory - Mod...
Description
Antenna Theory Basic Principles For Daily Applications
Base Station Antenna Systems March 2009
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
1
Base
Station Antenna Technology Evolution
Antenna Core Technology Omni Vertical Directional Polarization
Air Interfaces
Dominate Ap Application
DualPol® MIMO
Dual Band DualPol® RET Capacity Improvement Interference Reduction with Frequency MIMO MIMO
Significant Ap Application
Digital Beam Former SDMA Capacity
SmartBeam® Capacity´ Load Balance MIMO
Low Ap Application
AMPS GSM CDMA W-CDMA WiMAX TD-SCDMA LTE
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
2
Dipole
¼ P
F0
¼ P
F0 (MHz)
P (Meters)
P (Inches)
30
10.0
393.6
80
3.75
147.6
160
1.87
73.8
280
1.07
42.2
460
0.65
25.7
800
0.38
14.8
960
0.31
12.3
1700
0.18
6.95
2000
0.15
5.9
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
3
3D
View Antenna Pattern
Source: COMSEARCH
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
4
Understanding
The Mysterious ´dBµ
dBd
Signal strength relative to a dipole in empty space
dBi
Signal strength relative to an isotro pi c c radiator
dB
Diff erence erence between two signal strengths
dBm
Absolute signal strength relative to 1 milliwatt 1 mWatt = 0 dBm Note: The 1 Watt = 30 dBm Logarithmic Scale 20 Watts = 43 dBm 10 * log10 (Power Ratio)
dBc
Signal strength relat iv iv e to a signal of known strength, carr er in this case: the i signal
Example: ±15 Example: ±150 0 dBc = 150 dB dB below below car carrier rier signal signal If two carriers are 20 Watt W att each = 43 dBm ±150 dBc = ±107 dBm or ~0.02 pWatt or ~1 microvolt
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
5
Effect Of VSWR Good VSWR is only one component com ponent of an efficient antenna. VSWR
Return Loss (dB)
Transmission Loss (dB)
Power Power Reflected (%) Trans. (%)
1.00
g
0.00
0.0
100.0
1.10
26.4
0.01
0.2
99.8
1.20
20.8
0.04
0.8
99.2
1.30
17.7
0.08
1.7
98.3
1.40
15.6
0.12
2.8
97.2
1.50
14.0
0.18
4.0
96.0
2.00
9.5
0.51
11.1
88.9
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
6
Shaping Antenna Patterns
Vertical arrangement of properly phased dipoles allows control of radiation patterns at the horizon as well as above and below the horizon. The more dipoles that are stacked vertically, vertically, the flatter the vertical pattern is and the higher the antenna coverage or µgain¶ is in the general direction of the horizon.
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
7
Shaping Antenna Patterns (Continued) Aperture
Vertical
Horizontal
of Dipoles
Pattern
Pattern
Single Dipole
Stacking 4 dipoles vertically in
line changes the pattern shape (squashes the doughnut) and increases the gain over single dipole.
peak of the horizontal or The vertical pattern measures the gain. The little lobes, illustrated in the 4 Dipoles Vertically Vertically Stacked
lower section, are secondary minor lobes.
General Stacking Rule Collinear elements (in-line vertically). Optimum spacing (for non-electrical tilt) is approximately 0.9. Doubling the number of elements increases gain by 3 dB, and reduces vertical beamwidth by half. PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
8
Gain
What is it? Antenna gain is a comparison of the power/field characteristics of o f a device under test (DUT) to a specified gain standard.
Why is it useful? Gain can be associated with coverage distance and/or obstacle penetration (buildings, foliage, etc).
How is it measured? It is measured using data collected from antenna range testing. The reference gain standard must always be specified.
What is Andrew standard? Andrew conforms to the industry standard of +/±1 dB accuracy accuracy..
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
9
Gain
References (dBd And dBi)
An isotropic antenna is a single point in space radiating in a perfect sphere (not physically possible).
Isotropic Pattern Dipole Pattern
Isotropic (dBi) Dipole (dBd) Gain dBi dB d
A dipole antenna is one radiating element (physically possible).
A gain antenna is two or more radiating elements phased together.
3 (dBd) = 5.14 (dBi) 0 (dBd) = 2.14 (dBi)
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
10
Principles Of Antenna
Gain
Omni Antenna, Side View
Directional
Antennas, Top View
-3 dB
0 dBd
0 dBd
60° -3 dB
+3 dBd +3 dBd
180°
30°
--3 3 dB -3 dB
+6 dBd
+6 dBd
15°
90°
-3 dB --3 3 d dB B 7.5°
+9 dBd
+9 dBd
45°
-3 dB --3 3 dB
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
11
Theoretical Gain Of Antennas (dBd) 3 dB Horizontal Aperture (Influenced by Grounded Back ´Plateµ)
Typical Length of Antenna (ft.) 800/900 MHz
DCS
Vertical
360°
180°
120°
105°
90°
60°
45°
33°
PCS
1800/1900
Beamwidth
) P 1 9 .
0
3
4
5
6
8
9
1100.5
1
0.5
60°
2
3
6
7
8
9
11
12
13.6
2
1
30°
3
4 .5
7.5
8 .5
9 .5
15.1
3
1 .5
20°
4
6
9
10
11
16.6
4
2
15°
6
7 .5
10.5
11.5
12.5
18.1
6
3
10°
9
12
13
14
19.6
8
4
7.5°
0
s ( r d o t e a c i a d p a S R y f l l o a # c i t r
V e 8
10.5 12.5 13.5 12
14
15
13.5 15.5 16.5 15
17
18
Could be horizontal radiator pairs for narrow horizontal apertures.
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
12
Antenna Gain
Gain (dBi) (dBi) = Directivity Directivity (dBi) ± Losses (dB) (dB) Losses:
Conductor Dielectric Impedance Polarization
Measure using µGain by Comparison¶
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
13
Antenna Polarization Polarization
Vertical polarization ± Tradi Traditio tional nal land land mobile use use ± Omni Omni ant anten enna nas s ± Requires Requires spatial spatial separation separation for for diversity diversity ± Still recommended recommended in rural, low multipath multipath environment environments s
Polarization diversity ± Slant Slant 45° (+ and ±) is now popula popular r ± Requires Requires only only a single antenna antenna for diversity diversity ± Lower Lower zoning zoning impac impactt ± Best performance performance in high and medium medium multipat multipath h environments Measured Measure d d ata ata will be be presente resented d i n the Sy stems stems S ect ect ion ion PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
14
Various Radiator
Designs Elements
®
Dipole
1800/1900/UMTS Directed Dipole
DualPol (XPol) Directed Dipole
Patch
800/900 MHz Directed Dipole
MAR Microstrip Annular Annular Ring
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
15
Dipoles
Single Dipole
Crossed Dipole
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
16
Feed
Harness Construction
ASP705
ASP705K
513D 3DS LBX-651
Center Feed (Hybrid)
Corporate Feed
(Old Style)
Series Feed
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
17
Feed
Harness Construction (Continued) Center Feed (Hybrid)
Series Feed
Advantages
Minimum feed losses Simple feed system
Frequency independent main lobe direction
Reasonably simple
Disadvantages
BEAMTILT
+2° +1°
Corporate Feed Frequency independent main beam direction
feed system
More beam shaping ability,, sidelobe ability suppression
Not
Complex feed
as versatile as corporate (less
system
0°
+1°
bandwidth, less beam shaping)
ASP-705
+2° 450
455
460
465
470 M Hz
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
18
Feed
Networks
Coaxial cable ± Be Best st is isol olat atio ion n ± Co Cons nsta tant nt impe impeda danc nce e ± Co Cons nsta tant nt phas phase e
Microstripline, corporate feeds ± Di Diel elec ectr tric ic subs substr trat ate e ± Ai Airr sub subst strrate ate
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
19
Microstrip Feed Lines
Dielectric substrate ± Uses p pr r ii nted nted c c i i rcui rcui tt technology technology ± Po Powe werr li limi mita tati tion ons s ± Diel Dielect ectric ric substra substrate te causes causes loss ((~1. ~1.0 0 dB/m a att 2 GHz)
Air substrate ± Metal Metal stri strip p sp spaced aced above above a gro groundp undplane lane ± Mi Mini nima mall solde solderr or weld welded ed join joints ts ± La Lase serr cu cutt or or punc punche hed d ± Air s subst ubstrat rate e cause cause minim minimal al los loss s (~0.1 (~0.1 d dB/m B/m at 2 GHz) GHz)
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
20
Air Microstrip Network
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
21
LBX-33 BX-331 16-VTM Using Hybrid Cable/Air Stripline
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
22
LBX-33 BX-3319 19-VTM Using Hybrid Cable/Air Stripline
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
23
DB812 DB 812
Omni Antenna
Vertical Pattern
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
24
932DG65T2E-M
Pattern Simulation
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
25
Key
Antenna Pattern Objectives
For sector antenna, the key pattern objective is to focus as much energy as possible into a desired sector secto r with a desired radius while minimizing unwanted interference to/from all other sectors. This requires:
Optimized pattern shaping Pattern consistency over the rated frequency band Pattern consistency for polarization diversity models Downtilt consistency
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
26
Main Lobe What is it? The main lobe is the radiation pattern lobe that contains the majority portion of radiated energy.
Total Main Lobe 35°
Why is it useful? Shaping of the pattern allows the contained coverage necessary for interference-limited system designs.
How is it measured? The main lobe is characterized using a number of the measurements which will follow.
What is Andrew standard? Andrew conforms to the industry standard.
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
27
Half-Power Beamwidth Horizontal And Vertical 1/2 Power Beamwidth
What is it? The angular span between the half-power (-3 dB) points measured on the cut of the antenna¶s main lobe radiation pattern.
Why is it useful? It allows system designers to choose the optimum characteristics for coverage vs. interference requirements.
How is it measured? It is measured using data collected from antenna range testing.
What is Andrew standard? Andrew conforms to the industry standard.
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
28
Front-To-Back
Ratio
What is in it?dB of the maximum directivity The ratio of an antenna to its directivity in a specified rearward direction. Note that on a dual-polarized antenna, it is the sum of co-pol and cross-pol patterns.
Why is it useful?
It characterizes unwanted interference on the backside of the main lobe. The larger the number, the better!
How is it measured? It is measured using data collected from antenna range testing.
What is Andrew standard?
F/B Ratio @ 180 degrees 0 dB ± 25 dB = 25 dB dB
Each data sheet shows specific performance. In general, general , traditional dipole and patch elements will yield 23±28 dB while the Directed Di rected Dipole style elements will yield 35±40 dB. PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
29
Sidelobe Level What is level it? is a measure of a Sidelobe particular sidelobe or angular group of sidelobes sidelob es with respect to the main lobe.
Why is it useful?
Sidelobe Level (±20 dB)
Sidelobe level or pattern shaping allows the minor lobe energy to be tailored to the antenna¶s intended use. See Null Fill and Upper Sidelobe Suppression.
How is it measured?
It is always measured with respect to the main lobe in dB.
What is Andrew standard? Andrew conforms to the industry standard. PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
30
Null Filling What is it? Null filling is an array optimization technique that reduces the null between the lower lobes in the elevation plane.
Why is it useful? For arrays with a narrow vertical beamwidth (less than 12°), null filling significantly improves signal intensity in all coverage targets below the horizon.
How is it measured? Null fill is easiest explained as the relative dB difference between the peak of the main beam and the depth of o f the 1st lower null.
What is Andrew standard? Most Andrew arrays will have null fil filll of 20±30 dB without optimization. To qualify as null fi fill, ll, we expect no less than 15 a and nd typically 10±12 dB! PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
31
Null Filling Important For Antennas With Narrow Elevation Beamwidths
Null Filled to 16 dB Below Peak ) m 0 B d ( -20 l e v -40 e L d -60 e v i -80 e c e R-100
Transmit Power = 1 W Base Station Antenna Antenna Height = 40 m Base Station Antenna Antenna Gain = 16 dBd Elevation Beamwidth = 6.5°
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Distance (km)
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
32
Upper
Sidelobe Suppression
What is it?
First Upper Sidelobe Suppression
Upper sidelobe suppression (USLS) is an array optimization technique that reduces the undesirable sidelobes above the main lobe.
Why is it useful? For arrays with a narrow vertical beamwidth (less than 12°), USLS can significantly reduce interference due to multi-path or when the antenna is mechanically downtilted.
How is it measured? USLS is the relative dB difference between the peak of the main beam peak of the first upper sidelobe.
What is Andrew standard? Most of Andrew¶s arrays arrays will have USLS of >15 dB without optimi optimization. zation. The goal of all new designs is to suppress the first upper upp er sidelobe to unity gain or lower l ower.. PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
33
Orthogonality What is it?
H
The ability of an antenna to discriminate discrimi nate between two waves whose polarization difference is 90 degrees.
Why is it useful? Orthogonal arrays within a single antenna allow for polarization diversity diversity.. (As opposed to spacial diversity diversity.) .)
How is it measured? The difference between the co-polar pattern and the cross-polar pattern, usually measured inmain the boresite (the direction of the signal).
What is Andrew standard? Andrew conforms to the industry standard.
Decorrelation between the Green and Blue Lines H = 0°, XPol = ±g dB H = 5°, XPol = ±21 dB H = 10°, XPol = ±15 dB H = 15°, XPol = ±11 dB H = 20°, XPol = ±9 dB H = 45°, XPol = ±3 dB H = 50° 50°, XPol = ±2.3 dB H = 60 60°, XPol = ±1.2 d dB B H =70° =70°,, XP XPol ol = ±0. ±0.54 54 dB H =80° =80°,, XP XPol ol = ±0. ±0.13 13 dB H =90°, XPol = 0 dB XPol = 20 log ( sin (H) PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
34
Cross-Pol Ratio (CPR) What is it? CPR is a comparison of the co-pol vs. cross-pol pattern performance of a dual-polarized antenna generally over the sector of interest (alternatively over the 3 dB beamwidth).
Why is it useful?
120° 0 -5 -10 -15 -20 -25 -30 -35
Typical
-40
It is a measure of the ability abil ity of a cross-pol array to distinguish between orthogonal waves. The better the CPR, the better the performance of polarization diversity diversity..
How is it measured?
120°
Co-Polarization Cross-Polarization (Source @ 90°)
0
It is measured using data collected from antenna range testing and compares the two plots in dB
-5 -10 -15 -20
over the specified angular range. Note: in the rear hemisphere, cross-pol becomes co-pol and vice versa.
-25 -30 -35 -40
Directed Dipole
What is Andrew standard? For traditional dipoles, the minimum is 10 dB; however, for the Directed Dipole style elements, it increases to 15 dB min. min . PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
35
Horizontal Beam Tracking What is it? It refers to the beam tracking between the two beams of a +/±45° +/±45° polariza polarization tion dive diversity rsity antenna over a specified angular range.
120°
Why is it useful? For optimum diversity performance, the beams should track as closely as possible.
±45° Array
+45° Array
How is it measured? It is measured using data collected from antenna range testing and compares the two plots in dB over the specified angular range.
What is Andrew standard? The Andrew beam tracking standard is +/±1 dB over the 3 dB horizontal beamwidth.
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
36
Beam
Squint Horizontal
What is it?
Boresite
The amount of pointing error of a given beam referenced to mechanical boresite.
Why is it useful?
/2
Squint ±3 dB
+3 dB
The beam squint can affect the sector coverage if it is not at mechanical boresite. It can also al so affect the performance of the polarization diversity style antennas if the two arrays do not have similar simila r patterns.
How is it measured? It is measured using data collected from antenna range testing.
What is Andrew standard? For the horizontal beam, squint shall be less than 10% of the 3 dB beamwidth. For the vertical beam, beam , squint shall be less than 15% of the 3 dB beamwidth or 1 degree, whichever is greatest. PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
37
Sector Power Ratio (SPR) 120° What is it? SPR is a ratio expressed in percentage of the power outside the desired sector to the power inside the desired sector created by an antenna¶s pattern.
Why is it useful? It is a percentage that allows comparison of various antennas. The better the SPR, the better the interference performance of the system.
How is it measured? Desired
It is mathematically derived from the measured range data.
Undesired
300
P
What is Andrew standard? Andrew Directed Dipole style antennas have SPR¶s typically typically lless ess than 2 percent.
SPR (%) =
Undesired
60
X 100
60
P
300
Desired
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
38
Antenna² Based System Improvements Key Antenna Parameters To To Examine Closely Cl osely 932LG Directed Dipole
Standard Stand ard 85° Panel A Antenn ntenna a ±7 dB
74°
-10 dB
±6 dB
83°
points
74°
±16 dB
±35 dB
120° Cone of Great Silence with >40 dB Front-to-Back Ratio
Roll off at -/+ 60°
Horizontal Ant/Ant Isolation
83°
±12 dB
Next Sector Ant/Ant Isolation ±18 dB Cone of Silence
60° Area of Poor Silence with >27 dB Front-to-Back Ratio PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
39
Key
Antenna Pattern Objectives
Azimuth Beam
Beam tracking vs. frequency
1
1
1
Squint
1
1
1
Roll-off past the 3 dB points
1
2
3
Front-to-back ratio
1
1
2
Cross-pol beam tracking
1
1
1
Beam tracking vs. frequency f requency
1
2
3
Ratings:
Upper sidelobe suppression
1
2
3
1 = Always important
Lower null fill
3
3
2
2 = Sometimes important
Cross-pol beam tracking
2
2
3
3 = Seldom important
Limited to sub-bands on broadband models
Elevation Beam
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
40
Key
Antenna Pattern Objectives (Continued)
Downtilt
Electrical vs. mechanical tilt Absolute tilt Electrical tilt vs. frequency
Effective gain on the horizon Gain
Close to the theoretical value (directivity minus losses)
Note: Pattern shaping reduces gain.
1
1
3
2
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
2
1
1 Ratings: 1 = Always important 2 = Sometimes important 3 = Seldom important
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
41
Advanced Antenna Technology Adaptive Array (AA)
Planar array
4, 6, and 8 column vertical pol designs for WiMAX and TD-SCDMA*
Often calibration ports are used
External digital signal processing (DSP) controls the antenna pattern A unique beam tracks each mobi mobile le Adaptive nulling of interfering signals Increased signal to interference ratio performance benefits
* Time Division Spatial Code Division Multiple Access
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
42
Advanced Antenna Technology MIMO Systems
2 x 2 MIMO Spatial Multiplexing
Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO)
A DualPol ® RET for 2x2 MIMO,
External DSP extracts signal from interference
Spatial multiplexing works best in a multi-path environment
Capacity gains due to multiple antennas
Space Time Time Block Coding is a diversity MIMO mode
two separated for 4x4 MIMO
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
43
Advanced Antenna Technology SmartBeam® Antenna Family Most flexible and efficient antenna system in the industry i ndustry Solution for the traffic peaks instead of raising raisi ng the bar everywhere Full 3-way remote optimization options - RET ± Rem Remote ote El Electr ectrica icall Tilt (e.g. 0±10°) - RAS ± Remote Azim (+/± /± 30°) 30°) Azimuth uth Steering (+ - RAB ± Remote Azim (from 35 35°° to 1 105°) 05°) Azimuth uth Beamwidth (from
Redirect and widen the beam based on traffic requirements Balance the traffic per area with the capacity per sector Best utilization of radio capacity per sector Convenient and low-cost optimization from a remote office Quick and immediate execution Scheduled and executed several times a day (e.g. business and residential plan)
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
44
Advanced Antenna Technology SmartBeam ® 3-Way Model
35°
Azimuth patterns measured at 1710±2180 MHz
65°
with no radome.
90°
105°
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
45
Advanced Antenna Technology SmartBeam ® 3-Way Model
35°
Elevation patterns measured at 1710±2180 MHz
65°
with no radome.
90°
105°
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
46
System Issues Choosing sector antennas Narrow beam antenna applications Polarization²vertical vs. slant 45° Downtilt²electrical vs. mechanical RET optimization Passive intermodulation (PIM) Return loss through coax Antenna isolation Pattern distortion
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
47
Choosing Sector Antennas For 3 sector cell sites, what performance differences can be expected from the use of antennas with different horizontal apertures?
Criteria
Area of service indifference between adjacent sectors ( pi pi ng ng -pong -pong area) area)
For comparison, use 6 dB differentials Antenna gain and overall sector coverage comparisons
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
48
3
x 120° Antennas
120° Horizontal Horizontal Overlay Overlay Pattern Pattern 0 -5 -10
Exam ples
-15
VPol
-20 -25
Low Band
-30
DB874H120 DB878H120
-35
49 49°°
-40
3 dB PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL
49
© CommScope
3
x 90° Antennas
90° Horizontal Horizontal Overl Overlay ay Pattern Pattern 0
Exam ples
-5 -1 0 -1 5
Low Band
-2 0 -2 5
DB854DG90 DB856DG90 DB858DG90 LBX-9012 LBX-9013
-3 0
44°
VPol
XPol
-3 5 -4 0
DB842H90 DB844H90 DB848H90 LBV-9012
High Band DB932DG90 DB950G85 HBX-9016 UMWD-09014B UMWD-09016
UMW -9015
5 dB PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL
50
© CommScope
3
x 65° Antennas Exam ples
65° Horizontal Horizontal Overl Overlay ay Pattern Pattern
VPol
XPol 0
Low Band CTSDG-06513 DB844H65 CTSDG-06515 DB848H65 CTSDG-06516 LBV-6513
-5 -1 0 -1 5 -2 0
DB854DG65 DB856DG65 DB858DG65 LBX-6513 LBX-6516
-2 5 -3 0 -3 5
19°
-4 0
High Band
10 dB
UMWD-06513 UMWD-06516 UMW D D--06517 HBX-6516 HBX-6517
PCS-06509 HBV-6516 HBV-6517
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL
© CommScope
Special Narrow Beam Applicatio Applications ns
4-Sector Site (45°)
6-Sector Site (33°)
Road
Repeater Narrow Donor, Wide Coverage Antennas
Rural Roadway PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL
51
© CommScope
Test Drive Route
35
183
CELL SITE
N
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL
52
53
© CommScope
Polarization Diversity Tests
DB854HV90
DB854DD90
1 DRIVE TESTS
Test A .
Test B
+45° /-45° (Slant 45°)
2 0° /90° (H /V)
A
HANDHELD
1A
2A
B
MOBILE
1B
2B
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL
54
© CommScope
Slant 45° / Hand-Held In Car Space Diversity vs. Slanted +45°/±45° -40
Test Set-Up and Uplink Signal Strength Measurements DB833
DB854DD90
A
E
-50
S
Red
DB833 B
Green
9dB
) m B d ( -60 h t g n -70 e r t S l a -80 n g i
TEST 1A
9dB
Black
Blue
11dB 7.5 ft.
moving away from tower
moving towards tower
-90 moving crossface
-100 Uplink
Signal Strength
Vert Left
Vert Right
Slant Div
Slant Div
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL
55
© CommScope
Slant 45° / Hand-Held In Car Space Diversity vs. Slanted +45°/±45°
TEST 1A
Difference Between Strongest Uplink Signals 16
) 12 B d ( 8
h t g n e r 4 t S l a 0 n g i S
Slant ±45° Improvement
-4 -8 Difference Between Polarization Diversity and Space Diversity Average Difference
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL
56
© CommScope
Slant 45° / Mobile With Glass Mount Space Diversity vs. Slanted +45°/-45° -40
) -50 m B d ( h t -60 g n e r t S -70 l a n g i
TEST 1B
Test Set-Up and Uplink Signal Strength Measurements DB833
DB854DD90
A
E
B
Green
9dB
Black
Red
DB833 9dB Blue
11dB 7.5 ft.
moving away from tower
moving towards tower
S -80
moving crossface -90
Uplink
Signal Strength
Vert Left
Vert Right
Slant Div
Slant Div PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL
57
© CommScope
Slant 45° / Mobile With Glass Mount Space Diversity vs. Slanted +45°/-45°
TEST 1B
Difference Differenc e Between Strongest Uplink Signals 16
) 12 B d ( 8 h t g n e r 4 t S l a 0 n g i S
-4
Slant 45° Degradation
-8
Difference Between Polarization Diversity and Space Diversity Average Difference PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL
© CommScope
Rysavy Research
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL
58
© CommScope
Future
Technology Focus
Figure 16 shows that
HSDPA,1xEV-DO, and 802.16e are all within 2-3 dB of the Shannon bound, indicating that from a link layer perspective, there is not much room for
improvement. This figure demonstrates that the focus of future technology enhancements should be on improving system performance aspects that improve and maximize the experienced SNRs in the system instead of investigating new air interfaces that attempt to improve the link layer performance.
1 Peter
Rysavy of Rysavy Research, ³Data Capabilities: GPRS to HSDPA and Amer ii cas, c as, September 2005 Beyond´, 3G Amer
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL
59
60
© CommScope
The Impact Lower Co-Channel Interference/Better Capacity And Quality In a three sector site, traditional antennas produce a high degree of imperfect power control or sector overlap.
Tradi t ti i onal o nal Flat Panel s
65°
90°
Imperfect sectorization presents opportunities for:
Increased softer hand-offs Interfering signals Dropped calls Reduced capacity And rew rew Di recte rected Dipole
The rapid roll-off of the lower lobes of the
Andrew Directed Dipole antennas create larger, better defined µcones of sil silence¶ ence¶ behind the array.
65°
90°
Much smaller softer hand-off area Dramatic call quality improvement 5%±10% capacity enhancement PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL
© CommScope
61
120°
Sector Overlay Issues
On the
C a p pac ac i i tt y y an and d Outage P rr oba o babili tt y of a of a CD CDM M A H ei rarchi rarchi al l M M obil obil e Sy stem stem wi th th P er er ff ect/Im e ct/Im p per er ff ect e ct Pow er Co er Contr ntr ol an ol and d S ect ect or iz iz at at iion on By: Jie ZHOU et, al IEICE TRANS FUNDAMENT FUNDAMENTALS, ALS, VOL. VOL.E82-A, E82-A, NO.7 JULY 1999 . . . From the numerical results, the user u ser capacities are dramatically decreased as the imperfect power control increases and the overlap ove rlap between the sectors (imperfect sectorization) increases . . . E ff ff ect of ect of Sof tt an and d Sof ter ter H andoff andoff s on CD CDM M A Sy stem stem C a pac pac i i tt y y By: Chin-Chun Lee et, al IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 47, NO. 3, AUGUST 1998
15
f o s e s o10 g l a y t t n i e c 5 a c r p e a P c
0
15 10 5 0 Overlapping angle in degree
Qualitatively,, excessive overlay also reduces capacity of TDMA Qualitatively TDMA and GSM systems.
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL
© CommScope
Hard, Soft, and Softer Handoffs Hard Handoff -
Used in time division multiplex systems
-
Switches from one frequency to another
-
Often results in a pi a pi ng ng -pong -pong switching switching effect
Soft Handoff -
Used in code division multiplex systems
-
Incorporates a rake receiver to combine signals sig nals from multiple cells
-
Smoother communication without the c li li cks cks typical in hard handoffs
Softer Handoff -
Similar to soft handoff except combines signals si gnals from multiple adjacent sectors
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL
62
© CommScope
Soft and Softer Handoff Examples Softer Handoff
Two-Way Soft Handoff
Three-Way Soft
Handoff
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL
63
© CommScope
Beam Downtilt
In urban areas, service and frequency f requency utilization are frequently improved by directing maximum radiation power at an area below the horizon. This technique . . .
Improves coverage of open areas close to the base station. Allows more effective penetration of nearby buildings, particular high-traffic lower levels and garages.
Permits the use of adjacent frequencies in the same general region.
64
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
Electrical/Mechanical Downtilt
Mechanical downtilt lowers main beam, raises back lobe.
Electrical downtilt lowers main beam and lowers back lobe.
m echanical downtilts A combination of equal electrical and mechanical lowers main beam and brings back lobe onto the horizon!
65
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
Electrical/Mechanical Downtilt (Continued)
Mechanical
Electrical
66
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
DB508 DB 5083 3 Downtilt
Mounting Kit
DB5083 downtilt mounting kit is constructed of heavy duty galvanized steel, designed for pipe mounting 12´ to 20´ wide panel antennas.
Correct bracket calibration assumes a plumb mounting pipe!
Check antenna with a digital level.
67
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
Mechanical
Downtilt
Pattern Analogy²Rotating A Disk
Mechanical tilt causes . . . Beam peak to tilt below horizon
Back lobe to tilt above horizon At
90°, no tilt
68
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL
69
© CommScope
Mechanical 100
Downtilt 90
Coverage 100
80
110
70
120 130 140 150
160
170
10
180
0
350
190
340
210
330 320 310 300 290 260
270
280
Elevation Pattern
40 30
160
20
200
50
150
30
220
60
140
40
230
70
130
50
250
80
120
60
240
90
110
20
170
10
180
0
190
350
200
340
210
330 220
320 230
310 240
300 250
290 260
270
280
Azimuth Pattern
Mechanical Tilt 0° 4° 6° 8° 10°
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
0°
Mechanical
Downtilt
Q
u iz iz
What is the vertical beamwidth bea mwidth of a 4-element array?
85°
70
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
7°
Mechanical
Downtilt
93°
71
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
15°
Mechanical
Downtilt
123°
72
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
20°
Mechanical
Downtilt
Horizontal 3 dB Bandwidth Undefined
73
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
Managing Beam Tilt
For the radiation pattern to show maximum gain in the direction of the horizon, each stacked dipole must be fed from the signal source i n phase hase..
Feeding vertically arranged dipoles out ut of of phase phase will generate patterns that look loo k u p or or loo look k dow dow n.
The degree of beam tilt is a function of the phase shift of one dipole relative to the adjacent dipole.
Generating Beam Tilt Dipoles Fed I n Phase
Dipoles Fed Out of Phase
Energy in
Phase Exciter
Exciter
74
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
Electrical Downtilt Pattern Analogy²Forming A Cone Out Of A Disk
Electrical tilt causes . . .
Beam peak to tilt below horizon Back lobe to tilt below horizon At 90°, tilt below horizon All the pattern tilts Cone of the Beam Peak Pattern
75
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL
76
© CommScope
Electrical Downtilt Coverage 90
90 110
100
80
110
70
120
80
70
120
60
130
100
50
140
60
130
50
140
40
150
150
30
160
40 30
160
20
20
170
10
170
10
180
0
180
0
190
350
190
350
200
340
210
330
220
320 230
310
340
200 210
330 320
220 310
230 240
240
250
260
270
280
290
300
Elevation Pattern Electrical Tilt
300 250
260
270
280
290
Azimuth Pattern 0° 4° 6° 8° 10°
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
Mechanical Vs. Electrical
Downtilt
Mechanical
Electrical
77
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
Remote Electrical
Downtilt
(RET)
Optimization ATM200-002 RET Device (Actuator)
Local PC
ATC200-LITE-USB Portable Controller
Local PC
ANMS Remote Locations
ATC300-1000 Rack Mount Controller Network Server
78
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
Ericsson Interoperability Interoperability
79
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL
80
© CommScope
Intermod Interference Where?
F3
F1
Tx F1
Rx F3
F2
Receiver-Produced
Tx F2
Tx F1
F2
Transmitter-Produced
Tx F2
F1 F2
F1 F3
Tx1 F2 Tx2
Rx F3
Elsewhere
F3
Rx F3 Tx1 Tx2
C O M B
DUP Rx3 RF Path-Produced
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
High Band ProductFFrequencies, Two-Signal IM IM = nF ± mF 1
2
Example: F1 = 1945 MHz; F2 = 1930 MHz
n
m
Product Order
1
1
Second
2
1
Third
1
2
Third
2
2
Fourth
3
2
Fifth
2
3
Fifth
*Odd-order difference products fall in-band.
Product Formula
Product Frequencies (MHz)
1F1 + 1F2
3875
1F1 ± 1F2 2F1 + 1F2 *2F1 ± 1F2
15 5820 1960
2F2 + 1F1 *2F2 ± 1F1
5805 1915
2F1 + 2F2
7750
2F1 ± 2F2 3F1 + 2F2 *3F1 ± 2F2
30 9695 1975
3F2 + 2F1 *3F2 ± 2F1
9680 1900
81
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
Two-Signal IM Odd-Order Example: F1Difference = 1945 MHz; FProducts 2 = 1930 MHz F = F1 - F2 = 15 F2
F1
1930
1945 F dBc
3F2 ± 2F1
2F2 ± F1
2F1 ± F2
1915
1960
1900 F
2F 5th
3rd
F F2
F1
Third Order: F1 + F; F2 - F Fifth Order: F1 + 2F; F2 - 2F Seventh Order: F1 + 3F; F2 - 3F Hi gher gher than the hi ghest ghest ± low er than the low est est ± none i n-bet w w een e en
dBm
3F1 ± 2F2 1975
2F 3rd
5th
82
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
PCS A Band Intermodulation 11th
9th
7th
5th
3rd
1855
1870
1885
1900
1915
Channell Bandwidth Channe Bandwidth Block (MHz) C 30 C1 15 C2 15 C3 10 C4 10 C5 10
Frequencies 1895±1910, 1975±1990 1902.5±1910, 1982.5±1990 1895±1902.5, 1975±1982.5 1895±1900, 1975±1980 1900 ±1905, 1980 ±1985 1905±1910, 1985±1990
1930
1945
FCC Broadband PCS Band Plan Note: Some of the original C block licenses (originally 30 MHz each) were split into multiple licenses (C-1 and C-2: 15 MHz; C-3, C-4, and C-5: 10 MHz).
83
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
PCS A & F Band Intermodulation 3rd 1895
Channe Bandwidth Channell Bandwidth Block (MHz) C 30 C1 15 C2 15 C3 10 C4 10 C5 10
Frequencies 1895±1910, 1975±1990 1902.5±1910, 1982.5±1990 1895±1902.5, 1975±-1982.5 1895±1900, 1975±1980 1900 ±1905, 1980 ±1985 1905±1910, 1985±1990
1935
1975
FCC Broadband PCS Band Plan Note: Some of the original C block licenses (originally 30 MHz each) were split into multiple licenses (C-1 and C-2: 15 MHz; C-3, C-4, and C-5: 10 MHz).
84
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
Causes Of IMD Ferromagnetic materials in the current path: -
Steel
-
Nickel plating or underplating
Current disruption: -
Loosely contacting surfaces Non-conductive oxide layers between contact surfaces
85
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL
86
© CommScope
700, 750, 850A&B,
PCS & AWS polarization diversity DBXNH-6565A-VTM
| | | | |
| | | | |
850
LNX-6512DS-VTM
850
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
850
PCS 700
AWS 750
850
850 B+B¶
TMA
TMA
Triplex
Triplex
Triplex
Triplex
Lo/Mid/Hi
Lo/Mid/Hi
Lo/Mid/Hi
Lo/Mid/Hi
Triplex Lo/Mid/Hi
700 Lower A & B
LNX-6512DS-VTM
X
TMA
850
DBXNH-6565A-VTM
PCS A WS
Triplex Lo/Mid/Hi
Triplex Lo/Mid/Hi
850 A+A¶+A¶¶
4 antennas and 4 transmission lines
Triplex Lo/Mid/Hi
750 Upper C
AWS
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
Upper 700
C / 850 A expanded
Product Frequencies, Three-Signal IM FIM = F1 + F2 ±F3
F1 MHz
F2 MHz
F3 MHz
Product Order
Product Formula
Product MHz
755
890
869
Third
1F1+1F2+1F3
776
757
890
871
Third
1F1+1F2+1F3
776
869
869
891.5
Third
1F1+1F2+1F3
846.5
757
891.5
872.5
Third
1F1+1F2+1F3
776
757
891.5
869.5
Third
1F1+1F2+1F3
779
*Odd-order difference products fall in-band.
87
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
System VSWR Calculator System VSWR Calculator Version 9.0 Frequency (MHz):
Component Used?
No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1
850.00
18-Mar-09
System Component
Max. VSWR
Return Loss (dB)
Antenna or Load Jumper Tower Mounted Amp Jumper Top Diplexer or Bias Tee Jumper Main Feed Line Jumper Bias Tee Jumper Surge Suppressor Jumper Bottom Diplexer or Duplexer Jumper
1.50 1.05 1.20 1.09 1.15 1.09 1.07 1.09 1.15 1.09 1.07 1.09 1.20 1.08
13.98 32.26 20.83 27.32 23.13 27.32 29.42 27.32 23.13 27.32 29.42 27.32 20.83 28.30
An d drre w
C om omm S Sc co pe pe
Cable Type / Component Loss (dB) VXL7-50 LDF4-50A 2
0.20 2 0.20 2.00 8 4 0.10 2.00 0.10 3.00 0.10 FSJ4-50B 1.00
Cable Length (m)
Cable Length (ft)
1.83
6.00
1.83
6.00
1.83 200.00 30.48 11.00 1.83
6.00 656.17 100.00 36.09 6.00
1.83
6.00
27.30
89.57
Ins Loss w /2 Conn (dB) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00
% of Est. System Reflection 87.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 12.8%
Reflections at input 0.1003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0385
100.0%
Legacy Jumper / TL Cables 1 /2 inch Superflexible Copper 1 /2 inch Foam Copper
FSJ4-50B LDF4-50A
1 /2 inch Superflexible Aluminum 1 /2 inch Foam Aluminum
Legacy Transmission Lines 7 /8 inch Copper 1 1 /4 inch Copper 1 5 /8 inch Copper 7 /8 inch Very Flexible Copper 1 1 /4 inch Very Flexible Copper 1 5 /8 inch Very Flexible Copper 7 /8 inch Virtual Air Copper Yes
1 5 /8 inch Virtual Air Copper 7 /8 inch Aluminum 1 1 /4 inch Aluminum 1 5 /8 inch Aluminum
No
An d drr ew ew
LDF5-50A LDF6-50 LDF7-50A VXL5-50 VXL6-50 VXL7-50 AVA5-50 AVA7-50 AL5-50 AL7-50
Estimated Conn Loss ( 2per cable) CR 540 SFX 500 FXL 540 C om om m mS S co co pe pe
CR 1070 CR 1480 CR 1873
Typical System Reflection: Typical System VSWR: Typical System Return Loss (dB):
Worst System Reflection: Worst System VSWR: Worst System Return Loss (dB): Total Insertion Loss (dB): Return Loss to VSWR converter
FXL 780 FXL 1480 FXL 1873
Return Loss (dB) 17.00
0.028 0.1074 1.24 19.4 0.1387 1.32 17.2 3.00 Feet to meters converter
VSWR
Feet
meters
1.33
100.00
30.48
88
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
Possible Cascaded VSWR Results Possible results (at a given frequency) when Antenna and TMA are interconnected with different electr i i cal cal length jumpers. If: L = 1.5:1 (14 dB RL RL Antenna) S = 1.2:1 (20.8 dB RL TMA) Then: X (max) = 1.8:1 (10.9 dB RL)
S (min) = 1.25:1 (19.1 dB RL)
W or or st case sel d dom o m
ha ppens i n real l if if e, e, but be aware that i t t is possi ble! ble!
From http://www.home.agilent.com/agilent/editorial.jspx?cc=US&lc=eng&ckey=895674&nid=-35131.0.00&id=895674
89
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
Recommended Antenna/TMA Qualification Test 50 ohm load
Antenna
6 foot LDF4-50A Adapter or jumper to bypass TMA
6 foot LDF4-50A
TMA
TMA
12 foot LDF4-50A 12 foot LDF4-50A
Transmission Line
20 foot FSJ4-50
Antenna Return Loss Diagram
Transmission Line
20 foot FSJ4-50
TMA Return Return Loss Diagram
90
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
Attenuation Provided By Vertical Separation Of Dipole Antennas
B d n i i n o t a l o s I
Antenna Spacing in Feet (Meters) The values indicated by these curves are approximate because of coupling which exists between the antenna and transmission line. Curves are based on the use of half-wave dipole antennas. The curves will also provide acceptable results for gain type antennas. If values (1) the spacing is measured between the physical center of the tower antennas and it (2) one antenna is mounted directly above the other, with no horizontal offset collinear). No correction factor is required for the antenna gains.
91
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
Attenuation Provided By Horizontal Separation Of Dipole Antennas
B d n i i n o t a l o s I
Antenna Spacing in Feet (Meters) Curves are based on the use of half-wave dipole antennas. The curves will also provide acceptable results for gain type antennas if (1) the indicated isolation is reduced by the sum of the antenna gains and (2) the spacing between the gain antennas is at least 50 ft. (15.24 m) (approximately the far field).
92
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
Pattern Distortions
Conductive (metallic) obstruction in the path of transmit and /or receive antennas may distort antenna radiation patterns in a way that causes systems coverage problems and degradation of communications services. A few basic precautions will prevent pattern distortions.
Additional information information on metal obstructions can also be found online at: www.akpce.com/page2/page2.html
93
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
Pattern Distortions Side Of Building Mounting
Building
94
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
90°
Horizontal Pattern
Obstruction @ ±10 dB Point 0 340
10
350
20
0
330 320
30 40
-5 -1 0
310
50
-1 5
300
880 MHz
60
-2 0 290
70
-2 5 -3 0
280
80
-3 5 270
90
-4 0
260
0°
100
250
±10 dB Point
110
240
12 0 230
130 220
140 210
150 200
190
180
170
160
Antenna
Building Corner
95
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
90°
Horizontal Pattern
Obstruction @ ±6 dB0 Point 340
10
350
20
0
330 320
30 40
-5 -1 0
310
50
-1 5
300
880 MHz
60
-2 0 290 280
-2 5
0
-3 0
80
-3 5 270
90
-4 0
260
0°
±6 dB Point
100
250
11 0
240
120 230
130 220
140 210
150 200
190
180
170
160
Antenna
Building Corner
96
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
90°
Horizontal Pattern
Obstruction @ ±3 dB0 Point 340
10
350
20
0
330 320
30 40
-5 -1 0
310
50
-1 5
300
880 MHz
60
-2 0 290
0
-2 5 -3 0
280
80
-3 5 270
±3 dB Point
90
-4 0
0°
Building Corner
100
260
110
250
120
240
130
230 220
140 210
150 200
190
180
170
16 0
Antenna
97
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
90°
Horizontal Pattern
0.51 Diameter Obstacle Obsta cle @ 0° 0 340
10
350
20
0
330 320
30 40
-5 -1 0
310
50
-1 5
300
880 MHz
60
-2 0 290
0
-2 5 -3 0
280
80
-3 5 270
90
-4 0
260
100
0° 12P
11 0
250 240
120 230
130 220
140 210
150 200
190
180
170
160
Antenna
98
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
90°
Horizontal Pattern
0.51 Diameter Obstacle Obstacle @ 45° 45° 340
350
0
10
20
0
330 320
30 40
-5 -1 0
310
50
-1 5
300
880 MHz
60
-2 0 290
0
-2 5 -3 0
280
80
-3 5 270
90
-4 0
260
45°
100
250
P
110
240
120 230
1 30 220
140 210
150 200
190
180
170
160
Antenna
99
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
100
90°
Horizontal Pattern
0.51 Diameter Obstacle Obsta cle @ 60° 60° 0 340
10
350
20
0
3 30 320
30 40
-5 -1 0
310
50
-1 5
30 0
880 MHz
60
-2 0 290
0
-2 5 -3 0
280
80
-3 5 27 0
90
-4 0
60°
26 0
100
250
P
110
240
120 230
Antenna
130 2 20
140 210
150 200
190 180
170
160
Additional information on metal obstructions can also be found online at www.akpce.com/page2/page2.html .
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
101
90°
Horizontal Pattern
0.51 Diameter Obstacle Obsta cle @ 80° 80° 0 340
10
350
20
0
3 30 320
30 40
-5 -1 0
310
50
-1 5
30 0
880 MHz
60
-2 0 290
0
-2 5 -3 0
280
80
-3 5 27 0
90
-4 0
26 0
100
250
80°
P
110
240
120 230
Antenna
130 2 20
140 210
150 200
190 180
170
160
Additional information on metal obstructions can also be found online at www.akpce.com/page2/page2.html .
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
General
Rule
Area That Needs To To Be Free Of Obstructions (> 0.51) Maximum Gain > 12 WL
3 dB Point (45°) 6 dB Point (60°)
WL
> 3 WL
10 dB Point (80± (8 0± 90 90°) °)
Antenna 90° horizo horizontal ntal (3 (3 dB) bea beamwidth mwidth
102
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
Pattern Distortions
D
tan d tan 1° for 0° < < 10°
= = = :
d
d D D x tan 0.01745 tan = x tan 1°
Note: tan 10° = 0.1763
10 x 0.01745 = 0.1745
103
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
Gain
Points Of A Typical Main Lobe
º ° Relative to Maximum Gain
Vertical Beam Width= 2 x ° (±3 dB point)
±3 dB poin pointt ° belo below w bore boresite. site. ±6 dB point 1.35 x ° bel below ow b bore oresit site. e. ±10 dB poin pointt 1.7x ° below bore boresite. site.
104
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
Changes In Antenna Performance In The Presence Of: Non-Conductive Obstructions
9 0 ° P C S A n t e n n a
Fiberglass
Panel
Dim ³A´
105
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL
106
© CommScope
Performance Of 90° PCS Antenna Behind Camouflage (¼" Fiberglass) 120°
FIBERGLASS
PAN PA NEL
110° e r u t r
DIM ³A´
100° e p A l a t n 90° o z i r o H 80° 1/2 P
1/4 P
3 /4 P
1-1/2 1- - 1/2 P
1 P
2 P
70° 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Distance of Camouflage Camouf lage (Inches) (Dim. A)
11
12
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © CommScope
Performance Of 90° PCS Antenna Behind Camouflage (¼" Fiberglass) 1.7
) 1.6 e s a C t s r 1.5 o W ( 1.4 R W S 1.3 V
FIBERGLASS
PAN PA NEL
DIM ³A´
1/4 P
1/2 P
1-1/2 1- - 1/2 P
1 P
2 P
1.2 0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Distance of Camouflage Cam ouflage (Inches) (Dim. A) W/Plain Façade
W/Ribbed Façade
Without Facade
107
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL
108
© CommScope
Distance From Fiberglass 0° 330°
30°
90°
300°
0° 330°
60°
270°
90°
90°
-55
- 55
- 50
- 50
- 45
- 45 -40
- 40
240°
120°
-35 -3 5
240°
-30
-25 -2 5 -20
120°
-35 -3 5
-30
210°
102° 2°
300°
60°
270°
30°
210°
150°
-25 -2 5 -20
150°
180°
180° 0°
No Fiberglass
330°
30°
300°
68°° 68 60°
270°
90° -50 -45 -40 -35 -3 5
240°
120°
-30 -25 -25
210°
-20 -15 -1 5
150°
180°
1.5" to Fiberglass
3" to Fiberglass
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL
109
© CommScope
Distance From Fiberglass 0° 330
0° 30°
°
300°
77 77°°
330°
30°
112°° 112
300
60°
60°
°
270°
270
90°
90°
°
-50
- 50
-45
- 45
-40
-40
2 40
-35 -3 5
°
-30
-35 -3 5
2 40
120°
120 -30
°
210°
-20 -15 -1 5
°
-25 -2 5
-25 -2 5
210
150°
°
180°
-20 -15 -1 5
180
1 50 °
° 0°
4" to Fiberglass
330°
30°
8° 108°
300°
60°
270
90°
°
-50 -45 -40 -35 -3 5
240°
120° -30 -25 -2 5
210 °
-20 -15 -1 5
1 80
1 50 °
°
9" to Fiberglass
6" to Fiberglass
View more...
Comments