Bhakta Bahadur Shrestha
Short Description
ETABS Analysis...
Description
Structural Analysis & Design Report
A STRUCTURAL DESIGN REPORT OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING OF RESIDENTIAL
OWNER: Mr. Bhakta Bahadur Shrestha
SUBMITTED TO: Dharan Sub-Metropolitan city, Sunsari
Structural Analysis & Design Report
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN This report comprises the summary of the residential building of Mr. Bhakta Bahadur Shrestha 15-Dharan Nepal. The reports consist of the design procedures adopted, the assumptions made, the inputs made in the design and the design output. During the design, it is assumed that the client will completely follow the architectural as well as the structural design. It is also assumed that the construction will be supervised by professional engineer.
The designer will not be responsible if any alterations to the structural system is made by the client or the contractor without the prior written permission from the designer, or the alterations to non-structural system is made such that the weight of each individual floor or the weight of the whole building is altered by more than 10% of design weight of each floor and the total weight.
The design calculations and derivations are limited to only a minimum to let the concerned people know the methodology adopted. However, the calculations may be provided to the client or concerned authorities when needed, upon request. Hence the building is safe.
1
Structural Analysis & Design Report
TABLE OF CONTENTS
S.N. Title 1
Introduction
Page No. 3
2
Salient features
3
3
Design Approach and Methodology
6
4
Preliminary Design
8
5
Final Analysis
9
6
Design Methodology
11
7
Analysis Output
13
8
Design of Members
20
2
Structural Analysis & Design Report
1.0 Background This report summarizes structural analysis and design of the Residential building for Dharan
Sub-Metro politician City. The analysis and design has been based on the
prevailing codes that are in practice in Nepal, the National Building Code of Nepal and the IS codes at places.
2.0 Salient Features 2.1 Project Information: Owner
:
Mr. Bhakta Bahadur Shrestha
Building Type
:
Residential Building
Location
:
Dharan-15
Plot no.
:
Land Area
:
Plinth Area
:
2.2 Building Features: Type of Structure:
RCC Framed Structure
Storey:
3-Storey + Staircase Cover
Storey Height:
3.048m
Total Height:
12.192 m
2.3 Site Condition: Soil Type:
III (for seismic consideration as per NBC 105)
Seismic Zone Factor:
1.0
Safe Bearing Capacity:
150 KN/m2 (assumed)
3
Structural Analysis & Design Report
2.4 Material Specification: Considering Architectural, Economic and strength demands reinforced cement concrete (RCC) is used as the major structural material. The selected material also confirms the availability and ease in construction. The concrete grade used is M20 as per Indian Standard Specification. This material provides minimum grade of structural concrete and favorable for easy production and quality control as well. Fe 500 is provided as longitudinal and shear reinforcing in Beams, Columns, foundations, and slabs wherever RCC is used.
Considerations of material for loading and strength parameter are as detailed below:
Structural Components: Concrete: Grade:
M20
Characteristic Compressive Strength:
20 N/mm2
Unit Weight:
25.0 KN/m3
Young’s Modulus of Elasticity (E):
= 5000 √ fck N/mm2 ≈ 22360680 KN/m2 (for M20)
Steel Reinforcement: Grade:
Fe 500 (for both longitudinal and shear reinforcement)
Non-Structural Components: Brick wall: Unit Weight:
18.85 KN/m3
Strength:
Not Available
Finishing: Plaster: Unit Weight:
20.4 KN/m3
Flooring:
Screed + Punning
Unit Weight per meter:
1.2 KN/m2
4
Structural Analysis & Design Report
2.5 Loading Details Number of Storey
1 Storey + Semi Basement + Staircase Cover
Loading in General
Structural Self Weight
(Gravity loads)
Live Load for residential services Dead load of finishing materials for floor
Panel walls
250mm & 125mm thick brick walls without openings 125mm thick brick walls with 30% openings
Partition walls
125mm thick (half brick) walls with 30 & 20% openings
Parapet walls
125 mm thick (half brick) wall height 0.8m
Live Load
As per IS 875 Part II
Lateral Loading
As per NBC 105:1994
The loads distributed over the area are imposed on area element and that distributed over length are imposed on line element whenever possible. Where such facility is not feasible, equivalent conversion to different loading distribution is carried to load the Model near the real case as far as possible. For lateral load, necessary calculations were performed and checked using NBC 105: 1994 for response spectrum method. Different load combinations based on Nepal National Codes are developed and used for design purposes. Load Combinations: The load combinations are based on NBC 105: 1994 Static Load Combination: 1.5 DL + 1.5 LL Seismic Load Combinations: 1.0 DL + 1.3 LL± ± 1.25 EQ 0.9 DL ± 1.25 EQ For seismic loading, mass equivalent to the load that composed of 100% of Dead load and 25% of Live load is taken into consideration. The Earthquake lateral loads were used in the combination from the Self-Generated Load on the Seismic coefficient Method. Modal analysis is carried out using FEM Based three dimensional analyses. 5
Structural Analysis & Design Report
3.0 Design Approach and Methodology: 3.1 Introduction The structure is analyzed for full Finite Element. Beams and columns modeled as frame (line) elements with five and three internal stations. All floor slabs are modeled as Shell (Area) elements with sufficient and appropriate meshing. Modulus of elasticity and Poisson’s ratio for used material i.e. M20 grade concrete (as per Indian Specification) are taken accordingly and section properties used are based on Preliminary section sizing with consideration for deflection, minimum size specified and serviceability. Computation for stiffness as a whole is carried out using FEM based latest software. Full Modal Analysis is carried out up to twelve modes confirming more than 95 % seismic mass participation and it is applied for lateral seismic force distribution that generated with NBC 105 based Spectral Function for Soil Type-III. For Section Design and Check, suitable Load combinations as suggested in NBC105:1994 and if not covered in that, IS 1893- 2002 is referred with consideration of Envelopes of internal Forces developed. Foundation design is carried out to satisfy strength and stability requirements. 3.2 Software used: (Introduction to Analysis software) The analysis for the structural system was carried out using ETABS 2016 ver 16.0.0 is a product of computers and structures Inc, Berkeley. It is a FEM based software having facility of RC Design based on IS-456:2000
3.3 Structural Performance: Structural response under limit state of serviceability is thoroughly checked. The force and stiffness relationship resulting the deflection under various load cases and combined action of forces are duly evaluated. Basically short-term elastic deflection due to vertical loads and lateral deflection due to seismic forces are of major importance along with the long-term deflection of beam elements under sustained loading condition due to shrinkage and creep are also taken into account.
3.4 Deformation under Vertical Loads:
6
Structural Analysis & Design Report
Maximum vertical deflection in all components that resulted under vertical load of combined effect of self, imposed dead and live load are checked for every element and maintained to be within permissible limit. Short-term elastic deflection and long-term deflection due to shrinkage and creep due to sustained loads also are maintained within permissible limits for all the elements.
3.5 Deformation under Lateral Loads: Effect of lateral load due to seismic force is analyzed using self-generated seismic load compatible with Codal provision. The distribution of lateral force at different parts of the structure is done based on the response under unit force. Using Complete Quadratic Combination (CQC) method of modal combination combines the deformations, and related forces reported.
3.6 Recommendations: The following recommendations are made: •
Materials used shall confirm minimum standard specified before use. Primarily the cement, aggregate, sand and steel shall be used that confirms to NS or IS standard.
•
Batching, mixing, placing and curing of concrete and steel fabrication and placing shall be done as per standard practice.
•
7
Construction safety shall be well planned and implemented.
Structural Analysis & Design Report
4.0 Preliminary Design The Preliminary Design was done using the prevailing thumb rules and span consideration. Slab: The slab is designed based on IS456:2000. The slab is designed to meet the deflection criteria for the slab. Beam: The beam is designed based on IS456:2000. The slab is preliminarily designed to meet the deflection criteria as well as the moment requirements for the span. Column: The column is preliminarily designed to meet the stiffness criteria for the building. Staircase: The staircase is designed to satisfy the moment requirement as well as the deflection criteria.
The sizes of the structural components are as given below: Sizes of Structural Components: Slab:
5” thick RCC (M20) Slab
Beam:
Rectangular Beams size-
Column:
Square, size-
Staircase:
Waist Slab 5” thick
8
10” X 15” (BXD)
12”X 12” (HXB)
Structural Analysis & Design Report
5.0 Final Analysis 5.1 Load Calculations: Refer Table: Load Intensity of Building Components Live Load:
2.0 KN/m2 (for all rooms)
Live Load:
3 KN/m2 (for staircases and lobbies)
Roof Live Load:
1.5 KN/m2 (for roof accessible), 0.75 KN/m2 (for roof inaccessible)
5.2 Seismic Lump Load: Seismic weight: Comprises Dead Load+ 25% of Live Load (as per IS Code for live load intensity ≤ 3 KN/m2) Seismic wt. at ith floor level (WI) = (Total dead load of all components i.e. Beam, Slab, Columns And Walls for ½ height above and ½ height below the floor level + 25% of live load) n
Total Weight of the frame, W= ∑ Wi
Where, n = total number of storey
I=1
Seismic Wt. of Building W = 2311.94 KN Base Shear Calculation: As Per NBC 105: Total Horizontal Base Shear V= Cd × W Where, Cd = C×Z×I×K Where, Basic Shear Factor (C)
= According to time period of vibration and Soil type
Seismic Zoning Factor (Z) = For Dharan Importance Factor (I)
= According to the type of building
Performance Factor (K)
= for the moment resisting frame
Distribution of design seismic force: Fi = Design Seismic Force at floor Level I Wi = seismic wt. at ith floor level hi = height of floor i measured from base According to NBC 105:1994 Height of building (h) = 12.192 m 9
Structural Analysis & Design Report
Soil type = III Time period (T) = 0.06 × H0.75 = 0.39 Sec C = 0.08
(from Fig 8.1 of NBC105:1994)
Z = 1.00
(for Dharan, Fig 8.2 of NBC105:1994)
I = 1.0
(for Residential Bldg., Table 8.1 of NBC105:1994)
K = 1.00
(for Ductile Moment resisting Frame, Table 8.2 of NBC105:1994)
Cd = C×Z×I×K = 0.08 Total Horizontal Base shear Vx = Vy = 0.08*2311.94 Total Horizontal Base shear Vx = Vy = 184.955 KN
5.3 Load Cases: Dead : Self Weight of the building structural components (Beams, columns and slabs) Finish : Weight of the finishing of the slabs as well as staircases (including steps). Wall
: Wall loads (inclusive of plaster)
Live
: Live load in the building area elements.
Rlive : Live load in the terraces both accessible and inaccessible (not including in seismic behaviour) EQX : Spectral Seismic Load in X – Direction EQY : Spectral Seismic Load in Y – Direction
5.4 Load Combination: DL = 1.5Dead + 1.5Finish + 1.5 Wall + 1.5 Rlive + 1.5Live DQX = 0.9 Dead + 0.9 Wall + 0.9 Finish ± 1.25 EQX DQY = 0.9 Dead + 0.9 Wall + 0.9 Finish ± 1.25 EQY DLEQX = 1.0 Dead + 1.0Wall + 1.0 Finish + 1.3 Live ± 1.25 EQX DLEQY= 1.0 Dead + 1.0 Wall + 1.0 Finish + 1.3 Live ± 1.25 EQY
10
Structural Analysis & Design Report
6.0 Design of Structural Members 6.1 Design Assumptions: Foundation The Safe Bearing Capacity (SBC) of the soil is taken to be 150 KN/m2. The depth of the foundation is taken as 1.67 m. It is assumed that the soil below is converted to a firm base by sufficient compaction through any convenient means or as directed by the site engineer.
Beam: The beams are assumed to be rectangular. The preliminary design of the beam is carried out considering the deflection criteria as well as the loading condition.
Slab: The longest span slab is designed and for uniformity in construction, all the slabs are detailed according to the designed slab. The slab is designed based on IS 456:2000, for adjacent edge discontinuous. However during detailing, the torsion in the free edges is considered.
6.2 Design Methodology: The design of beams and columns that are the structural components in the building are carried out using the results and analysis for critical responses and also checking with manual calculations is carried out. The design of the foundation is carried out based on the base reactions as obtained from the software with necessary adjustments. The design of slabs and staircases are carried out based on the prevailing design practices, following the codal provisions.
6.2 Calculation of Wall Loads. The calculations of the loads are given in the following tables:
Load Intensity of Wall 10”Thickness of wall Full wall intensity =15.0 KN/M 11
Structural Analysis & Design Report
20% opening Wall intensity =12.0KN/M 30% opening Wall intensity =10.5KN/M
5”Thickness of wall Full wall intensity =7.50 KN/M 20% opening Wall intensity =6.0 KN/M 30% opening Wall intensity =5.2 KN/M Parapet 5”wall Parapet wall =2.2KN/M
12
Structural Analysis & Design Report
7.0 ANALYSIS OUTPUT Result from Structural models and analysis
3D Model of the Building
13
Structural Analysis & Design Report
JOINT REACTIONS
14
Structural Analysis & Design Report
Design Plan (Basement)
15
Structural Analysis & Design Report
Design Plan (Ground Floor)
16
Structural Analysis & Design Report
Shear Force Diagram (Sample only)
17
Structural Analysis & Design Report
Axial Force Diagram (Sample only)
18
Structural Analysis & Design Report
Bending Moment Diagram (Sample only)
19
Structural Analysis & Design Report
8.0 Design of Members Design of Beams and Columns The design of beams and columns are done from the software itself. However, it is to be notified that the limitations of the design by the software have been evaluated and the adjustments have been made accordingly. The samples (summary) of the design through the software based on IS456: 2000 has been presented hereunder. Output for the Reinforcement Area (Beams and Columns)
Grid -1
20
Structural Analysis & Design Report
Grid –2
21
Structural Analysis & Design Report
Grid –3
22
Structural Analysis & Design Report
Grid –4
23
Structural Analysis & Design Report
Grid –A
24
Structural Analysis & Design Report
Grid –B
25
Structural Analysis & Design Report
Column Reinforcement First Floor Second Floor
Node No.
Column Type
Ground Floor
38,40
C-1 (12"X12")
8-16φ
4-16φ+4-12φ
4-16φ+4-12φ
_
29,30,31, 34,36
C-2 (12"X12")
4-20φ+4-16φ
8-16φ
4-16φ+4-12φ
8-12φ
32
C-3 (12"X12")
8-20φ
4-20φ+4-16φ
8-16φ
4-16φ+4-12φ
Grid No.
Beam Type
Y-dir
Stirrups
Beam Reinforcement Top Reinforcement Bottom Reinforcement 2-16φ (T) +2-16φ (E) 3-16φ (T) 2-16φ (T) +1-16φ (E) 3-16φ (T) 2-16φ (T) +1-12φ (E) 2-16φ +1-12φ (T) 3-12φ (T) 3-12φ (T) 2-16φ (T) +1-16φ (E) 2-16φ +1-12φ (T) 2-16φ (T) +1-12φ (E) 2-16φ +1-12φ (T) 3-12φ (T) 3-12φ (T) 3-12φ (T) 2-16φ +1-12φ (T)
Floor
GF 1st B-1 (10"X15") 2nd Top GF 1st B-2 (10"X15") 2nd 3rd
X-dir
Stair Cover
8mm φ @4" c/c near joint & 6" c/c at mid 8mm φ @4" c/c near joint & 6" c/c at mid 8mm φ @4" c/c near joint & 6" c/c at mid
Stirrups 8mm φ @4" c/c near joint & 6" c/c at mid 8mm φ @4" c/c near joint & 6" c/c at mid
Combined Footing Reinforcement Details Node No.
Footing Type
Size
Reinforcement in x-direction & ydirection
Concrete Footing Depth
Edge Depth
Footing depth from Ground level
31,32
CF2
6'0"X12'0"
12mm φ @ 150mm c/c
16"
8"
5'-6"
34,36
CF1
6'0"X12'0"
12mm φ @ 150mm c/c
16"
8"
5'-6"
Isolated Footing Reinforcement Details Node No.
Footing Type
30,40
F-1
Size
Reinforcement in x-direction & ydirection
Concrete Footing Depth
Edge Depth
Footing depth from Ground level
5'6"X5'6"
12mm φ @ 150mm c/c
16"
8"
5'-6"
Strap Footing Reinforcement Details
Node No.
Footing Type
Size
Reinforcement in xdirection & ydirection
31,34
F-1
5'6"X5'6"
12mm φ @ 150mm c/c
Type SB-1
26
Size 12"X18"
Concrete Footing Depth
Edge Depth
16"
8"
Strap Beam Reinforcement Details Top reinforcement Bottom Reinforcement 4-16mm φ Th. 3-16mm φ Th.
Footing depth from Ground level 5'-6"
Stirrups 2-L-8mm φ @4" c/c th.
Structural Analysis & Design Report
ETABS 2016 Concrete Frame Design IS 456:2000 Beam Section Design
Beam Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary) Level
Element
Unique Name
Section ID
Combo ID
Station Loc
Length (mm)
LLRF
Story1
B10
10
Beam 10X15
DCon7
3200.4
3352.8
1
b (mm)
h (mm)
bf (mm)
ds (mm)
dct (mm)
dcb (mm)
254
381
254
0
25
25
Section Properties
Material Properties Ec (MPa)
fck (MPa)
Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless)
fy (MPa)
fys (MPa)
22360.68
20
1
500
500
Design Code Parameters ɣC
ɣS
1.5
1.15
Factored Forces and Moments Factored Mu3 kN-m
Factored Tu kN-m
Factored Vu2 kN
Factored Pu kN
-99.1431
5.885E-06
94.1851
0.3002
Design Moments, Mu3 & Mt Factored Moment kN-m
Factored Mt kN-m
Positive Moment kN-m
Negative Moment kN-m
-99.1431
8.654E-06
0
-99.1431
Design Moment and Flexural Reinforcement for Moment, Mu3 & Tu Design -Moment kN-m Top
(+2 Axis)
Design +Moment kN-m
-99.1431
Bottom (-2 Axis)
0
-Moment Rebar mm²
+Moment Rebar mm²
Minimum Rebar mm²
Required Rebar mm²
744
0
744
208
372
0
0
372
Shear Force and Reinforcement for Shear, Vu2 & Tu Shear Ve kN
27
Shear Vc kN
Shear Vs kN
Shear Vp kN
Rebar Asv /s mm²/m
Structural Analysis & Design Report
Shear Ve kN
Shear Vc kN
Shear Vs kN
Shear Vp kN
Rebar Asv /s mm²/m
123.3232
52.2367
71.0865
85.0373
553.33
Torsion Force and Torsion Reinforcement for Torsion, Tu & VU2 Tu kN-m
Vu kN
Core b1 mm
Core d1 mm
Rebar Asvt /s mm²/m
6.235E-06
86.4033
224
351
0
ETABS 2016 Concrete Frame Design IS 456:2000 Column Section Design
Column Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary) Level
Element
Unique Name
Section ID
Combo ID
Station Loc
Length (mm)
LLRF
Story1
C4
50
Col 12X12
DCon7
0
3048
0.651
Section Properties b (mm)
h (mm)
dc (mm)
Cover (Torsion) (mm)
304.8
304.8
56
30
Material Properties Ec (MPa)
fck (MPa)
Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless)
fy (MPa)
fys (MPa)
22360.68
20
1
500
500
Design Code Parameters ɣC
ɣS
1.5
1.15
Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Design For Pu , Mu2 , Mu3 Design Pu kN
Design Mu2 kN-m
Design Mu3 kN-m
Minimum M2 kN-m
Minimum M3 kN-m
Rebar Area mm²
Rebar % %
712.789
-14.2558
73.8201
14.2558
14.2558
2175
2.34
Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Factors
28
K Factor Unitless
Length mm
Initial Moment kN-m
Additional Moment kN-m
Minimum Moment kN-m
Major Bend(M3)
0.714001
Minor Bend(M2)
0.665395
2667
29.528
0
14.2558
2667
-2.1788
0
14.2558
Structural Analysis & Design Report
Shear Design for Vu2 , Vu3 Shear Vu kN
Shear Vc kN
Shear Vs kN
Shear Vp kN
Rebar Asv /s mm²/m
Major, Vu2
56.7692
80.3933
30.3333
56.7692
337.85
Minor, Vu3
48.336
80.3933
30.3333
48.336
337.85
Joint Shear Check/Design Joint Shear Force kN
Shear VTop kN
Shear Vu,Tot kN
Shear Vc kN
Joint Area cm²
Shear Ratio Unitless
Major Shear, Vu2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Minor Shear, Vu3
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
(1.1) Beam/Column Capacity Ratio Major Ratio
Minor Ratio
N/A
N/A
Additional Moment Reduction Factor k (IS 39.7.1.1) Ag cm²
Asc cm²
Puz kN
Pb kN
Pu kN
k Unitless
929
21.7
1651.588
314.4795
712.789
0.702111
Additional Moment (IS 39.7.1) Consider Ma
Length Factor
Section Depth (mm)
KL/Depth Ratio
KL/Depth Limit
KL/Depth Exceeded
Ma Moment (kN-m)
Major Bending (M3 )
Yes
0.875
304.8
6.248
12
No
0
Minor Bending (M2 )
Yes
0.875
304.8
5.822
12
No
0
Notes: N/A: Not Applicable N/C: Not Calculated N/N: Not Needed
29
Structural Analysis & Design Report
DESIGN OF FLOOR SLAB Design Data Dimensions of the slab (c/c distance b/w supports), Length of short span,
Lx
= 3.35 m
Length of long span,
Ly
= 3.96 m
Width of the supporting beam,
= 230
mm
Clear cover to main reinforcement
= 20
mm
Assume dia. of reinforcement steel
= 8
mm
fck
= 20
N/mm 2
fy
= 500
N/mm 2
Calculations d = 101
mm
lx = 3.35 m (or) 3.221 m whichever is less;
d = 3.221
m
ly = 3.96 m (or) 3.831 m whichever is less;
d = 3.831
m
Assume the thickness of slab as Effective span, (ly / lx ) =
125
mm ;
Effective depth,
1.19 < 2 ; Here, (ly / lx ) is less than 2, Hence design the slab as two way slab
Load Calculations Dead Load of slab
= 0.125 x 25
Finishes load on slab Live Load on slab
= 3.13 KN/m 2 = 1.20 KN/m 2 = 3.0 KN/m 2
Dust Load on slab
= 0
KN/m 2
Other load on slab
= 0
KN/m 2
Total Dead load acting on the Structure = 4.33 KN/m 2 Total live load acting on the Structure = 3.0 KN/m 2 2 Factored Design Load w = 11.00 KN/m (Type of panel according to support condition)
Support Condition
Two Adjacent Edges Discontinuous
For this support condition, 1.19,
Short span coefficient for (ly / lx ) =
Long span coefficient,
For negative moment,
ax =
0.0593
For negative moment,
ay =
0.047
For positive moment,
ax =
0.0445
For positive moment,
ay =
0.035
Moment Calculation Mx
Max. BM per unit width,
= ax w l x 2
Mu / bd2
Mu
2
pt
My
& Ast, req mm
0.50
0.1428
144
0.66
0.1904
192
N/mm
At mid span,
5.08
At supports,
6.77
For Short Span,
= (0.12/100) bD
Provide
Y 8
@
At mid span,
3.99
0.46
0.131
132
At supports,
5.36
0.62
0.1784
180
Provide
pro)
= 0.33
= 125
Refer Fig. 4 of IS 456, Modification factor
= 2
Allowable (Span / deff ) ratio
= 52
Effective depth required
= 62
mm
< d prov. Hence OK
Y 8
@
supports for long span
Check for Deflection fs = 0.58 fy (Ast req / Ast
150
mm 2
150 mm c/c at midspan & 335 mm 2 ) 150 mm c/c at midspan &
supports for short span
Percentage of tension reinforcement
=
Reinforcement details
For Long span,
30
Ast , min
2
%
KNm
= ay w l x 2
%
(Ast pro. =
(Ast pro. =
335 mm 2 )
Structural Analysis & Design Report
Design of Combined foundation Pleft(X)(unfactored) Pright(Y)(Unfactored) Soil bearing Cent Col Size Cornor Col Size Dist betw. Col. Center to center
361.33 488.00 150 0.3 0.3 3.35
KN KN KN/mm2 m m m
Max P Net upward soil pressure = Net upward soil pressure along length =
732 2 198.91 KN/m
Area req Width prov Total Length provided length Left Projection Right Projection
6.23 CG/from Left of Force 1.83 m 3.40 Check Value 3.5 m
0.00 0.75
0.15 0.15
1.92 4.4
364.00 KN/m
B.M under colm X= B.M under colm Y= dis dis
4.10 4.10 1.49 2.01
maxim projection 0.15
KN-m KN-m from left from right
Maximum hooging Moments
-322.22 KN-m
from left
Maximum hooging Moments max moments d calculated from moments =
-626.22 KN-m 4.10 KN-m 28.47 mm
from right
Check for two way shear D= d=
ok
550 494 mm
2.76543E-05 Ast
Ast at bottom
Ast mim.=
2
mm
12 dia spacing =
2
190.62
2.76543E-05 Ast
Ast At top Ast.
mm
2
108.43 mm
19.06
2
125 mm -1806.60 1806.60
-1 Ast
1907.18
12 dia spacing =
1084.82 mm provide spacing =
2
2
19.06 19.06 =0
-1 Ast
19.07
1084.824 mm
1907.18 mm
-3511.03
2
provide spacing =
125 mm
20
Grade of concrete M
Check for one way shear at d distance (Vu)= -179.82 Nominal shear stress(Tv)= -0.20 % of tension steel p = 12 dia 0.18 shear strength of M20 concrete for above % steel =
0.32 Ok
for 12 dia.
Check for two way shear concreate capacity =
1754132.72 N
From load =
606601.80 N
check
ok lateral distance
0.765
Transverse reinforcement 400 KN/m 117.05 KN-M
W= B.M = transverse reinforcement dis.(b)= 2 3.92914E-05 Ast Ast. Required 12 dia spacing =
31
556.86
1288
Ast min =
mm
544.67 544.67
-1 Ast mm 190.62 mm
2
763.5264 mm2
763.53 mm provide spacing=
2
125.00 mm for 12 dia.
Structural Analysis & Design Report
Design of Strap Footing
Project info: Strap Footing
Data:
Status of designe:
Exterior column load [KN].unfactored Interior column load [KN].unfactored Load factor Distance between column center lines[m] Depth of foundation Df [m] Allowable bearing capacity of soil [KN/sq.m] Width of ext. col. In strap beam direction [m] Width of ext. col. In direct perpendicular strap beam [m] Width of int. col. In strap beam direction [m] Width of int. col. In direct perpendicular strap beam [m] Breadth of strap beam [m] Eccentricity of exterior load from footing [m] R.C designation : Fcu [N/sq.mm] reinf. Strength : Fy [N/sq.mm] density of soil [KN/cu.m]
= = = = = = = = = = = = = =
TRUE
212 254.667 .
1 3.35 1.5 150 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.688 20 500 19
Calculation: reaction of ext.footing R1 geo. reaction of ext.footing R1T Req. ext. footing
266.79 [KN] 329.37 [KN] 2.20 [sq.m]
Dim. sq
1.48183
reaction of int.footing R2 geo. reaction of int.footing R2T Req. int. footing
199.87 [KN] 246.76 [KN] 1.65 [sq.m]
Dim. sq
1.2826
Use dimensions for ext.footing
L= B=
1.676 1.676
[m] Area prov.d 2.81 [m] in strap direction
128%
Use dimensions for int.footing
L= B=
1.676 1.676
[m] Area prov.d 2.81 [m] in strap direction
171%
check dim
Design of strap beam: Breadth of strap beam [m]
0.3 306.05 450 500
depth of strap beam from shear d Use depth d total depth H fcu
=
Width Depth
= = 2
K = M/bd fcu Z As bottom Design shear
= = = v=
Design concrete shear vc =
20 N/smm
300 mm 450 mm
fy
2
1.40 N/mm 2 0.56 N/mm
[mm] [mm] [mm]
TRUE = 500 N/smm
Max. B.M. Max. S.F.
2 0.12 N/mm 328.31 mm 2 600.00 mm
TRUE
A's required As required As provided
Mu‾ = 109 kNm Vu = 164 kN Mu = 42 kNm 2 mm 0.00 2 765.82 Top mm 2 800 Top mm
Diameter of stirrups 8 mm Spacing of stirrups reqd. 346 mm
check shear at col face
32
TRUE
As prvd. 104% No. legs
TRUE 2
Structural Analysis & Design Report
Design of exterior footing:
fcu
TRUE
147.48 [KN/sq.m]
Net presure under ext. footing
20 N/smm
fy
500 N/smm
Safe bearing capacity 150 [KN] [KN] Overburden height 1.0 Area of footing reqd. 1.90 [KN] [KN] Area of footing provided 2.81 500 [KN/sq.m] Footing thickness Short span Long span Length L= 1.68 Width B= 1.68 m 300.00 mm Column breadth 300 Column width Max. cantilever proj. 0.69 Max. cantilever proj. 1.38 m 139.62 kNm Max. B.M. /m width 35 Max. B.M. /m width
m mm m kNm
K = M/bd2fcu
N/mm 2
Ult. column load Self weight Overburden Total load Net upward pressure ult.
266.79 49.16 98.31 414.26 147.48
0.037 410.40 782.06 12 125
Z As required /m width Diameter of bars Spacing of bars As provided/m width
[KN/sq.m] m m2 m2
A prvd.
TRUE L reqd. 1.14 B/W 1.00
[mm]
As min 577
N/mm 2
K = M/bd2fcu
0.009
mm
Z As required /m width Diameter of bars Number of bars/side As provided/m width
12 [mm] As prvd. 125 [mm] 905 [sq.mm] 116%
[mm] [mm] [mm] 905 [sq.mm]
No. of bars 422 mm 13 190 [sq.mm] 13
TRUE
476%
0.00 [KN] Dist. to critical section 0.00 [N/sq.mm] Shear force 0.37 [N/sq.mm] Shear stress
Punch shear Punch shear stress Allow.shear stress
688 [mm] 101 [KN] 0.23 [N/sq.mm] TRUE
Design of interior footing:
fcu
20 N/smm
Ult. column load Self weight Overburden Total load Net upward pressure ult.
199.87478 44 103 347 124
Short span Width B= Column width Max. cantilever proj. Max. B.M. /m width 2
K = M/bd fcu Z As required /m width Diameter of bars Spacing of bars As provided/m width
fy
500 N/smm
Safe bearing capacity [KN] [KN] Overburden height [KN] Area of footing reqd. Area of footing provided [KN] [KN/sq.m] Footing thickness Long span
1.68 m
0.010 N/mm 363 mm 185 [mm]
150 1.1 1.60 2.81
[KN/sq.m] m 2 m 2 m
A prvd.
TRUE L reqd. 0.95 B/W 1.00
450 [mm]
Length L= 1.68 m Column breadth 300 mm Max. cantilever proj. 0.69 m Max. B.M. /m width 29 kNm
300 mm 0.69 m 29 kNm
12 125
TRUE
123.66 [KN/sq.m]
Net presure under int. footing
2
[mm] [mm] 905 [sq.mm]
2
N/mm
As min 512 2
K = M/bd fcu
0.009
Z As required /m width Diameter of bars Number of bars/side As provided/m width
12 [mm] 125 [mm] As prvd. 905 [sq.mm] 488%
No. of bars 374 mm 13 180 [sq.mm] 13
503% Punch shear Punch shear stress Allow.shear stress
33
0 [KN] Dist. to critical section 0.000 [N/sq.mm] Shear force 0.39 [N/sq.mm] Shear stress
344 [mm] 43 [KN] 0.11 [N/sq.mm] TRUE
TRUE
Structural Analysis & Design Report
DESIGN OF DOG LEGGED STAIRCASE Data Internal Dimensions Length = Width = Floor Height = Fck = Fy = Riser = Tread = Landing width = Effective Span = Height of each flight = No. of risers in each flight No. of Tread in each flight
3.9 1.93 3.05 20 500 166.75 250 1070 3.3 1.525 9.145427 8.145427
m m m N/mm2 N/mm2 mm mm mm m m Nos Nos
Design d
=
104
mm Required
D d
= =
125 104
mm mm
Loads DL of waist slab DL on horizontal area DL of steps LL FF Total load Factored load
= = = = = = =
3.125 3.76 2.084375 3 1.2 10.04 15.1
kN/m
= =
21 25
kN-m kN
d from BM consideration
86
mm
1.896 0.498 518
% mm2
= =
12 218
mm mm
Ast
=
125
mm
Dia of bar Spacing
= =
8 400
mm mm
2
kN/m2 kN/m2 kN/m2 kN/m2 kN/m2 (of one flight)
BM and SF Mu Vu
k pt Ast
= = =
Main Reinforcement Dia Spacing
Distribution Steel 2
Development Length Ld Therefore, Ld Provide, Ld
34
= = =
Ld = (Ø x σs) / (4 x Tbd) 1088 mm 1090 mm
Structural Analysis & Design Report
List of design code and Standards 1.
NBC-000-114:1994
: All relevant design codes in Nepal
2.
IS 456 – 2000
: Code for practice for plain & Reinforced concrete
3.
IS 875 – 1987
: Code of practice for Design Loads (other than Earthquake load for building & structures.
4.
IS 1893(part-I)-2002
: Code of practice for earthquake resist design of Structures.
5.
IS 13920 – 1993 Reinforced
: Code of practice for Ductile detailing of Concrete structures subjected to seismic forces.
6.
SP: 16 – 1980
: Design aids for Reinforced concrete to IS 456 -
1978
7.
35
ETABS 2016 V 16.0.0
: Proprietary program of Research Engineers
Structural Analysis & Design Report
36
View more...
Comments