Basic Education Sector Reform Agenda (BESRA).ppt

The BESRA Challenge

• ICT in Education • Partnerships with Private Sector/Industry • Increase spending for Basic Education

Vision: Functionally Literate Filipinos

• BEC • Hiring and deployment      s

Governance • SBM • Critical learning resources

     r      e        h      c      a      e        T

• Certification Program • Teachers benefits and Welfare

• Pre-school • Feeding

B A S I C Elementary ECE

• Training

Grade 1 Readiness Test

• Food for school

• Tech Voc

• English, Science, Math • Every Child a • NAT Reader  • NCAE • Multi-Grade •A&E • Distance and Special Education alternative learning

CHED

College/ University

E D U C AT I O N High School

Public Schools Private Schools Drop-outs

DSWD DOH LGUs

Teacher Development and Supply

NCAE + Counselling

Technical Vocational TESDA

Labor Force Alternative Learning

Accreditation & Equivalency

Basic Education Framework

INDUS TRY

Goal of Basic Education: Make every Filipino functionally literate.

MTPDP 2004-2010

BESRA 20052010

EFA 20012015

Policies and Thrusts 2007-2010* 1. 2.

3.

4.

5.

Make quality basic education accessible to all. Reduce the number of out-of-school youth and adults. Leap frog the quality of basic education into global standards (Basic Education Sector Reform Agenda or BESRA) Increase spending for basic education from all possible sources (public national + local, private sources, ODA) Tighten system governance and enhance schoolbased management.

* DepED Order 24, s. 2007

Scope/Coverage of BESRA Structure

Finances

Equipment, Resources

Business Processes

The Manager People

Products & Services

BESRA Key Result Areas Key Result Thrust 1. Schools and SBM Key Result Thrust 2. Teachers and their Development Key Result Thrust 3. National Learning Strategies and Quality Assurance & Accountability Key Result Thrust 4. Early Childhood, Alternative Learning and Private Education Key Result Thrust 5. Institutional culture change of DepED, modernization of finance, technological, administrative environments

Major Policies Developed Recently 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

6. 7. 8. 9. 10.

11.

Standards and Framework for Effective SBM (KRT 1) SBM Primers per Domain of Practice (4) (KRT 1) Policy on School Heads Provision (KRT 1) National Competency-Based Teacher Standards (KRT 2) Manuals on SIPlanning, School Governance, Assessment of SBM Practice (KRT 1) Drilling Down of School MOOE (KRTs 1 and 5) Quality Assurance and Accountability Framework (KRT 3) Manual on Simplified Accounting System (KRT 5) Customized (DepED-specific) Procurement Manual (KRT 5) Guidelines on SBM Grant Availment, Utilization and Liquidation (KRT 5) DepED OPES (Organizational Performance Evaluation System)

Ongoing Policy Actions 1. Creation of Internal Audit Service (IAS) at the Central Office 2. Full implementation of eNGAS 3. Compliance to COA Audit findings 4. Integrated system of planning and budgeting to include procurement, accounting and school planning 5. Customized Financial Management Manual/s 6. Installation of Human Resource Information System 7. Equitable resource allocation for offices and schools (PS, MOOE, CO) 8. Intensive capacity-building of concerned personnel in planning, financial management, educ’l. leadership, etc. 9. System/Procedures for Asset Management in DepED (school sites, classrooms/buildings, equipment and furniture, textbooks and other IMs, vehicles) 10. Development of Competency Standards for non-teaching personnel

Major Challenges Ahead

Quality Management * 1 Quality

2 Perform Quality

3 Perform

Planning

Assurance

Quality Control

Before the production process

During the production process

After the production process

¨Do the right things¨ Focused on setting quality objectives and necessary processes that will ensure achievement of quality objectives

¨Do things right¨

Application of planned, systematic quality activities to ensure that all processes employed will meet requirements

¨Done the right things right¨ Monitoring specific results to determine whether they comply with relevant quality standards and identify ways to eliminate unsatisfactory results

* KRT 3. Quality Assurance and Accountability Framework

Monitoring & Evaluation Systems Considerations

Management Level Central

Region



“Change effects change”

Division 

-systems-based theory District

School

Teacher

Learner

EMIS & ICT

Consolidates Information at various levels Facilitate Communication at various levels (Feedback)

What is the strongest chain? Where is the strongest chain? When is the chain strong?

District Level Division Level

Who in the chain is strong? Why is the chain strong?

Learner Level

Learning Center Level

Classroom Level School Level

Region Level

What is the weakest chain? Where is the weakest chain? When is the chain weak? Who in the chain is weak? Why is the chain weak?

Central Level

1.0 Systems Perspective: Strengthening the Education Delivery System

twg - qaaf

In All Levels Clearly established goals & targets Defined roles & responsibilities Integrated Planning, Implementation & Control Process Standards

Learner Level

Learning Center Level

District Level Division Level

Classroom Level School Level

Region Level

At Each Level Outcomes (results) Outputs (accountabilities)

Central Level

Processes

Inputs

2.0 Systematic Approach: Strengthen Each Chain in the Education Delivery System twg - qaaf

How to do QAA system-wide 







Standards of inputs that schools should be provided Standards of processes that schools should attain in their operations Standards of outputs their operations should achieve among their students Standards necessary for districts, divisions, regions and central offices to support and assure that schools achieve and maintain quality standards

How to promote welfare and benefits of teachers and other DepED personnel? 

Instructional materials and methods



Salaries and step increments



Loyalty pay and other mandated dues



Leave credits, health care



Security

Enabling Policy Environment

Greater Resource Mobilization

Technical & Logistical Support

Higher Learning Outcomes

PerformanceDriven Leadership w/ Accountability

Emerging Paradigm

QualityAssured BE

Sound Shared Governance