B. Nagesh-Suit-Recovery of Money-Attachment Before Judgment
August 19, 2022 | Author: Anonymous | Category: N/A
Short Description
Download B. Nagesh-Suit-Recovery of Money-Attachment Before Judgment...
Description
IN THE COURT OF T HE PRINC IPAL SENIOR C IVIL JUDGE AT WARANGAL O.S.No.
of 2012.
Betw een:Balne Nageshwar Rao
…
P l a i n t i ff
…
Defendants
An A n d 1 ) P u ra r a m R a me m e s h K u m ar ar 2 ) M d . Yo u n u s H u s s a i n
PLAIN T PR ESEN T ED U N D ER SEC T ION 26 R /W. OR D ER 4 & 7 RULE 1 OF C. P.C. I)
DESCRIP TION OF PLAINTI FF :-
B a ln l n e N a ge g e s hw h w a r R a o, o , S / o. o . V e e ra r a s wa w a m y, y, A g e: e : 4 2 y e ar a r s , O c c u: u: Employee, R /o. H .N o.3-14-266/1/A, Gouthamnagar, H anumakonda, Warangal. T he h e a dd d d re re ss s s f or o r t he h e s er er v vii ce c e o f s um u m mo m o ns n s , n ot o t ic ic e s process on the plaintiff is that of his advocate:-
an d
M. JITHIN PRASAD Ad A d v o c a t e , Warangal. II)
DESCRIP TION OF THE DEFENDAN TS :-
1 ) P u r a m R a m e sh s h K u m a rr,, S / o . P a n d a r i n at a t h , Ag Ag e : 4 6 y e a r s , O c c u : Sr. Asst. in Kakatiya U niversity, Women PG C ollege, Subedari, R /o. H .N o.3-14-562, KU C R oad, H anumakonda, Warangal. 2 ) M d . Yo Yo u nu n u s H u ss s s a in i n , S / o. o . A l t a f H u s s ai a i n , A g e: e : 4 0 y e a rs rs , O c c cu u: Employee, R /o. C /o.SD LC E, KU C , Warangal. T h e a d d r e s s f o r s u mm m m o n s, s , n o ttii c e s a n d defendants is the same as mentioned above.
process
on
the
T he plaintiff humbly submits as hereunder:I IIII )
I t i s s u bm b m it i t te t e d t ha h a t t he h e p l ai a i nt n t if i f f a nd n d d ef e f en e n da d a nt n t N o. o . 1 a re re t h e c o ll l l e a gu g u e s a n d w o rk r k e d i n s a me m e d e pa p a r tm t m e n t i . e ., . , K a ka k a t i ya ya U n i v e r si s i t y C a m p u s a n d h a v i n g a c q u a i nt nt a n c e w i t h e a c h o t h e r since last 20 20 years. Out of such acquaintance the defendant …contd
No.1 approached the plaintiff and requested him to lend an a m ou o u nt n t o f R s. s. 5 5,, 0 00 0 ,,0 0 0 0/ 0 / - t o m ee e e t h is i s p er e r so s o na n a l a nd n d f a mi mi l y n e c e s si si t i e s .
O n r e p ea ea t e d r eq e q u e s t s m a d e by b y t h e de d e f e n d an an t
N o .1 . 1 , i n v i ew e w o f a c qu q u a in i n t a nc n c e t h e p l ai a i n t if i f f a g re re e d f o r t h e same and accordingly on 15-02-2010, the plaintiff lend an a m o u n t o f R s . 5 , 0 0 , 0 0 0 // - t o w a r d s h a n d l o a n t o t h e d e f e n da da n t N o. o . 1. 1.
O n r e ce c e ip i p t o f s uc u c h a m ou o u nt n t , t he h e d ef e f en e n da d a nt n t N o. o. 1
e x e c u t ed ed a d e m a n d p r o m i s s o r y n o t e i n f a v o u r o f t h e p l a i n t i ff ff on the same day i.e., on 15-02-2010 agreeing to repay the s am am e
w it i t hi hi n
s ho h o rt rt
p er e r io io d
a nd nd
f ur u r th t h er er
a gr g r ee ee d
t ha ha t
t he he
borrowed pronote amount will be repaid to the plaintiff with i n te t e r es e s t @ 2% 2 % p er e r m o n th th .
T he h e d e f en e n da d a nt n t N o . 2 s to t o od od a s
g u a r a nt nt o r t o t h e s a i d a m o u n t a n d h e h a s a l s o s i n g e d o n t h e s ai ai d
p ro r o mi m i ss s s or or y
d ef e f en e n da d a nt nt s
a re re
n ot ot e u nd n d er er
d t: t : 15 1 5 -0 - 0 22 - 20 20 1 10 0. o bl b l ig i g at a t io io n
to
T hu hu s d is i s ch c h ar a r ge ge
b ot ot h
t he he
t he he
l oa oa n
amount jointly and severally to the plai ntiff.
IV V))
T he h e p l ai a i n ti t i ff f f s u bm b m i ts t s t h at a t a f te t e r a va v a il i l in i n g t he h e l o an a n a m ou o u nt nt t h e defendant No.1 failed to keep up his promise and did not c ho h o o se se t o r e pa pa y e it it h he e r i n te t e rre e st s t o r p rrii nc n c i pa p a l a mo m o u nt n t a nd nd w henever the plaintiff demanded the defendant N o.1, used to dodge the matter on one or other pretext, when the plaintiff w as badly in need of money also de manded to repay the loan amount, but the defendant No.1 expressed his inability and assured for repayment within short time and again failed to comply the demand.
V)
T he h e p la l a i nt n t if i f f s ub u b mi m i ts t s t ha ha t w h en e n ev e v er e r t he h e p la l a in i n ti t i ff ff d em e m an an de de d the defendant No.1 and 2 for repayment of the availed loan a mo m o un un t
a l on on g
w i th th
a c cr c r ue ue d
i nt n t er e r es es t
t he h e re r e o n, n,
b o th th
t he he
defendants have failed to comply the demand made by the p l a i n t i ff ff a n d d o d ge g e t h e s a m e wi wi t h o n e o r o th t h e r r e a so so n .
The
plaintiff lost the hope that he will get his money back from the defendants having no other go, approaching this Hon. C ourt to seek the indulgence of the H on. C ourt in recovering the due amount from the defendants N o.1 and 2. H ence this suit.
V II))
T he h e p l ai a i n ti t i ff f f s u bm b m i ts t s t h at a t t h e de d e f en e n da d a nt n t s a re r e d ue u e a m ou o u nt nt s a s under:-
1)
P r i nc nc i p pa al amount covered under t h he e : d em e m an a n d p rro o mi m i s so s o rry y n ot o t e d tt:: 1 15 5 - 02 02 -
Rs.5,00,000/-
2010 2)
Interest @2% per month from 15-022010 to 19-11-2012 (9 years, 9 months, 4 days). T O TA L
:
Rs.3,31,336/-
:
Rs.8,31,336/-
(R upees eight lakh thirty one thousand three hundred and thirty six only)
T hus the defendants N o.1 & 2 are li able to pay a total sum of Rs.8,31,336/- along with future interest @2% per month from the date of suit till realization. V I I) I)
C A US U S E O F A C TI T I O N : - T h a t t h e c a u s e o f a c t io io n f o r t h e s u it it a ro r o se se
o n 1 55 - 02 0 2 -2 - 2 01 0 1 0 w h en en
t he he
p la l a in i n ti t i ff ff
p ai ai d a
s um um
of
R s . 5 , 0 0, 0 , 0 0 0 // - t o t h e d e f e n da d a n t N o . 1 a n d t h e d e f e n da da n t N o . 1 has received and executed the promissory note in favour of the plaintiff and defendant No.2 stood as guarantor and all t he he
s ub u b se s e qu q u en en t
d ay ay s
w he he n
t he he
p la l a in i n ttii ff ff
d em e m an an d de ed
d e f e n da d a n t s t o d i sc s c h a r g e th t h e i r l e ga g a l l y e n f or o r c e a b l e de de b t
t he he and
the same is continuing. V I II I I ) J U RI R I S DI D I C TI T I O N : - R e ga g a r d h a d b e in i n g t h e p l ac a c e o f c a us us e o f action took place, the parties to the suit are residing within the Municipal Corporation limits of Warangal and in view of valuation of the suit, this H on. C ourt is having both territorial and pecuniary jurisdiction to entertain the suit, the suit is being filed w ithin the limitation. IX X))
C O UR UR T F EE E E & S UI U I T VA V A LU L U AT AT IO IO N : -
T he h e p la l a in i n t if i f f s u it it i s
valued a sum of Rs.8,31,336/- against the defendants No.1 a n d 2 a n d p l ai a i n t if i f f i s p a yi y i n g t h e C o ur ur t f e e o f R s . Section 20 of A.P.C.F. & S.V. Act, which is sufficient.
/ - u n de de r
X)
PR AYER AYER :- T herefore, it is prayed that the H on’ble C ourt may be pleased to decree the suit as hereunder:a ) P a s s d e c re r e e f o r R s . 8 , 31 3 1 , 3 3 6 / - ( Ru R u p e e s e i gh g h t l a k h t h i r t y o ne ne t h ou o u sa s a nd nd t h hrr ee e e h un u n dr d r ed e d a nd nd t h hii r ty t y s ix i x o nl n l y ) a ga g a in i n st st t h he e person and properties of the defendants N o.1 and 2. b ) G r a n t f u t ur u r e i n t e r es e s t @ 2 % p e r m o nt n t h f r o m t h e d a te te o f s u i t t i l l the realization of total decreetal amount. c ) C o st s t s o f t h is i s s u i t m ay a y b e a w ar a r d ed ed . d ) A n y o t h er e r r e l i e f o r r e l i e fs f s m a y b e g r a nt n t e d w h ic i c h t h e H o n ’ bl bl e Court deems fit and proper under the circumstances of the case.
PLAIN T IF F VER IF IC AT AT ION : I, the above named plaintiff, d o hereby declare t h at a t t h e a b o v e m e n t io i o n ed e d p l ai a i n t p a r a s N o . I t o V I a r e t r ue ue a n d correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and the rest of the paras No.VII to X are also true and incorporated on legal a d v i c e. e. this
H e n c e a dm d m i t t e d , v er e r i f i e d , f ou o u n d c o r r ec e c t a n d s i g ne ne d o n day of N ovember, 2012 at H anumakonda.
PLAIN T IF F LIST OF D OC U MEN T S F ILED BY T H E PLAIN T IF F :1 ) O r i g i n a l d em e m a n d p r om o m i s s o r y no n o t e d t : 1 55 - 0 2 - 2 01 01 0 2 ) O w ne n e rrs s hi h i p c er e r t if i f i ca ca tte e d tt:: 0 09 9 --1 11 --2 2 01 01 2 C orporation, Warangal (N o. 2)
i ss s s ue ue d
by
M un u n i ci c i pa pa l
3 ) X e r o x c o p y o f A g r e em e m e n t o f S a l e d t : 05 0 5 - 0 8 - 20 20 1 2 .
Date:
-11-2012. AD A D V O C AT E F O R P L A I N T I F F.
IN THE COURT OF T HE PRINC IPAL SENIOR C IVIL JUDGE AT WARANGAL I.A.No. In O.S.No.
of 2012. of 2012.
Betw een:Balne Nageshwar Rao
…
P e t i t i o ne r / Pl a i n t i ff
An A n d P ur ur a am m R am a m e sh s h K um u m ar a r & a no n o th t h er er …
R es e s p on o n de de nt n t s/ s / De D e fe f e nd n d an an ts ts
A F F I D A V I T I, Balne Nageshwar Rao, S/o. Veeraswamy, Age: 42 years, O cc c c u: u:
E mp m p l oy o y ee ee ,
R /o /o .
H .N . N o. o . 33 - 14 1 4 -2 - 2 66 6 6 /1 / 1 /A /A ,
G ou o u th t h am a m na n a ga g a r, r,
H a n u m ak a k o n d a , W a r an an g a l , d o h e r e b y s o l e m n l y a f f i r m a n d s t a t e o n oath as hereunder: 1 ) I a m t he h e d ep e p on o n en e n t h er er e eii n a nd n d t he h e p et e t it i t io i o ne n e rr// pl p l ai a i nt n t if i f f i n t he he above I.A. and suit, hence I know the facts of the case. 2 ) I s ub ub mi m i t t ha h a t I f il i l ed e d t he h e a b ov o v e s ui ui t f or o r r ec e c ov o v er e r y o f m on o n ey ey a ga g a in i n st st t h he e r es e s po p o nd n d en e n t s/ s/ d de e ffe e nd n d an a n tts s a nd n d I p rra ay th he e H on o n ’ bl bl e Court that the plaint averments may be pleased to considered as part and parcel of this affidavit. 3) T ha h a t t h e r es e s po p o nd n d en e n tts s //d d e fe f e nd n d an a n t s a r e l i ab a b le l e t o p ay a y t h e s ui ui t
amount to me and I am having good grounds and as well as d o cu c u m en e n t ar a r y e v i d en en c e i n t h e s u i t .
T h at a t t h e r e s p o nd n d e nt nt N o . 1
a rre e i nh n h e ri r i te te d t h he e p r op op er e r ty t y s ho h o wn w n i n t he h e a nn n n ex e x ed e d s ch c h e du d u le le herein. I submit that the respondent No.1 with an intention to defeat my claim against them and to in order to discharge and to avoid any legal proceedings and he is started negotiations to a li l i en e n at at e
t he he
s ch c h ed ed ul ul e
p ro ro pe p e rt r t y, y,
a nd nd
I
c a me me
to
k no no w
t he he
respondent No.1 with an intent to defeat the liability, entered i n t o a n a g re r e e m en e n t o f s a le l e d t :0 : 0 5 -0 - 0 8 -2 - 2 0 12 1 2 w i th t h o n e C h id i d u ra ra l a L al a l i tth h a, a , W /o / o . R ag a g hu h u n at a t h i n o rrd d e r t o s el e l l a wa wa y t h he e p et e t i ti ti o n s ch c h ed e d ul u l e p rro o p er e r ty t y a nd n d h e i s a ls l s o g oi o i ng n g t o e xe x e cu c u tte e r e gu gu l ar ar R egd. Sale D eed in favour of said Lalitha. I submit that in view
of urgency in the matter I could not give the prior notice to the respondents herein. 4) I s ub u b m it i t t h at at i f t h he e r es es p po o nd n d en e n t N o. o . 1 s uc u c ce c e ed e d s i n h is i s i l le l e ga ga l
attempt, very purpose of filing of the suit w ill be frustrated and I would not be in possession to recovery of the promissory note due amount from the respondent N o.1. In view of the facts and circumstances stated supra, it is therefore, prayed that the Hon’ble Court may be pleased to pass an order for conditional attachment before judgment order against th he e a nn n n e xe x e d s ch c h ed e d ul u l e p rro o pe p e r ty ty o f t h he e r es e s po p o nd n d en e n t N o. o . 1 b ef ef o orr e j u d g m e n t b y d i s p e n s i n g n o t i c e t o h i m , i n t h e i n t e r e s t o f j u s t i c e .
D EPON EN T V E RI R I F IC I C AT AT I ON O N : T h e d e po p o n en e n t , d o h e re r e b y s o le l e m nl n l y a ff ff i r m a n d signed this affidavit by admitting this contents and verified and s ig i g ne n e d b ef e f or o r e m e o n t hi h i s t he he
d ay a y o f N ov o v em e m be b e rr,, 2 01 01 2 a t
H anumakonda.
AD A D V O C AT E
IN THE COURT OF T HE PRINC IPAL SENIOR C IVIL JUDGE AT WARANGAL
Betw een:Balne N ageshw ar R ao, S/o. Veerasw amy, Ag A g e : 4 2 y e a r s , O c c u : E m p l o y e e , R / o . H .N . N o. o . 33- 1 14 4 -2 - 2 66 6 6 /1 / 1 /A /A , G ou o u th t h am a m na n a ga ga r, r, H anumakonda, Warangal. … An A n d
I.A.No.
of 2012.
In O.S.No.
of 2012.
P e t i t i o ne r / Pl a i n t i ff
1) Puram Ramesh K u m a r, S/o. Pandarinath, Age: 46 years, Occu: Sr. As A s s t . i n K a k a t i y a U n i v e r s i t y, W o m e n PG C ollege, Subedari, R /o. H .N o.3-14562, KUC Road, Hanumakonda, Warangal. 2) Md. Yo u n u s Hussain, S/o. Altaf Hussain, Age: 40 years, Occu: E mp m p lo l o ye y e e, e, R /o /o . C /o / o .S . S DL DL CE CE , K UC UC , Warangal. … Respondents/Defendants
PET IT ION F ILED U N D ER OR D ER 38 R U LE 5 OF C .P.C .P.C .
For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is therefore petitioner prayed that the H on’ble C ourt may be pleased t o p a s s a n o r d e r f o r c o n d i ti t i o n a l a t t a c h m e nt n t b e f o r e j u d g m e nt nt o r d e r a g ai a i n st s t t h e a n ne n e x ed e d s c he h e d ul u l e p r o pe pe r t y o f t h e r e sp s p o nd n d e n t N o .1 .1 before judgment by dispensing notice to him, in the interest of j u s t i c e .
Date:
-11-2012. AD A D V O C AT E F O R P E T I T I O N E R / PLAINTIFF.
IN THE COURT OF T HE PRINC IPAL SENIOR C IVIL JUDGE AT WARANGAL O.S.No.
of 2012.
Betw een:Balne Nageshwar Rao
…
P l a i n t i ff
An A n d Puram Rame sh Ku mar & anoth er
…
Defendants
A F F I D A V I T I, Balne Nageshwar Rao, S/o. Veeraswamy, Age: 42 years, O cc c c u: u:
E mp m p l oy o y ee ee ,
R /o /o .
H .N . N o. o . 33 - 14 1 4 -2 - 2 66 6 6 /1 / 1 /A /A ,
G ou o u th t h am a m na n a ga g a r, r,
H a n u m ak a k o n d a , W a r an an g a l , d o h e r e b y s o l e m n l y a f f i r m a n d s t a t e o n oath as hereunder: 1 ) I a m t h e d ep e p on o n en e n t h er e r ei e i n a nd nd t h he e p la l a in i n ttii ff ff i n t h he e a bo b o ve v e s ui ui t , hence I know the facts of the case. 2 ) I s ub ub mi m i t t ha h a t I f il i l ed e d t he h e a b ov o v e s ui ui t f or o r r ec e c ov o v er e r y o f m on o n ey ey a g ai a i n s t t he h e d e f e nd n d a nt nt .
T h e p l ai a i n t a v er e r m e nt n t s m a y k i n dl dl y b e
considered as part and parcel of this affidavit. T he contents of the plaint are true and correct to the best of my know ledge and belief. 3 ) I f u r t h e r s ub u b m i t t h a t I a m f i l in in g a v a i l a ab b l e d o c u m en en t s , w h i ch ch a r e g e n u i ne n e a n d n ot o t f a b r i ca ca t e d .
I a m n o t cl c l a i m i n g an an y f a l s e c l a i m
a ga g a in i n st s t t he h e d ef e f en e n da d a nt n t . T he h e rre e fo f o rre e , i t i s j us u s t a nd n d p rro o pe pe r t o register the case and pass appropriate orders. T h er e r e f or o r e , I p r a y t h e H o n’ n ’ b l e c o u r t t o r e gi g i s t er er t h e s u i t a n d p a s s a p p r o p r ia ia t e o r d e r s a g a i n s t t h e d e f e n d a n t s , i n t h e i n t e r e s t o f j u s t i c e .
D EPON EN T V E R I FI F I C AT AT I O N : S o l e m nl n l y a f f ir ir m e d a n d s i g n e d b e f o r e m e b y t h e d e po p o n en e n t a dm d m i tt t t i n g th t h e co c o n te t e n ts t s o f th t h e a ff ff i d av a v i t on o n t h is is day of N ovember , 2012 at Hanumakonda.
A AD D V O C AT E
IN THE COURT OF T HE PRINC IPAL SENIOR C IVIL JUDGE AT WARANGAL I.A.No. In O.S.No.
of 2012. of 2012.
Betw een:Balne Nageshwar Rao
…
P e t i t i o ne r / Pl a i n t i ff
An A n d P u ra r a m Ra R a me m e sh s h K um u m ar a r & a no n o th t h er er …
R es e s p on o n de d e nt n t s/ s / De D e fe f e nd n d an a n ts ts
PET IT ION SC H ED U LE PR OPER T Y
R CC C C h ou o u se s e b ui u i ld l d in i n g a nd n d A C s he h e et et r o oo o ffe e d s he h e d b ea e a ri r i ng ng H .J . J o. o . 33- 1 14 4 --5 5 63 63
&
3 -1 - 1 44 - 56 56 2
s it i t ua u a te te d
at
K um u m ar a r pa p a ll l l y, y,
K ot o t hu h u rr,,
H a n u m ak a k o n d a t o t a l i ng ng t o a n e x t e n t o f 2 3 3 . 3 3 s q . y a r d s w i t h i n t h e l i m it i t s o f M u n ic i c i pa p a l C o rp r p o ra r a t i on o n , W ar a r a ng n g a l, l , w i th t h i n t h e f o l lo l o w in in g boundaries.
East
:
House of Smt. Ramzan Bee
We s t
:
3 feet Lane of Puram Ramesh Kumar (respondent N o.1) & Open place of Katakam R amesh
North
:
House of Purushotham Rao
South
:
100 feet Road
PET IT ION ER VER IF IC AT AT ION :- I, the above nam ed peti tioner, do hereby decl are that the contents of the above schedule are true and co rrect to the best of my know ledge and belief, hence verified and signed on this day of N ovember, 2012 at Warangal.
PET IT ION ER AD A D V O C AT E F O R P E T I T I O N E R .
IN THE COURT OF T HE PRINC IPAL SENIOR C IVIL JUDGE AT WARANGAL I.A.No. In O.S.No.
of 2012. of 2012.
Betw een:Balne Nageshwar Rao
…
P e t i t i o ne r / Pl a i n t i ff
An A n d P ur ur a am m R am a m e sh s h K um u m ar a r & a no n o th t h er er …
R es e s p on o n de de nt n t s/ s / De D e fe f e nd n d an an ts ts
THIRD PARTY AFFIDAVIT
I, Somarathi Bixapathi, S/o. Mallaiah, Age: 49 years, Occu: Employee, R /o. H .N o.11-27-165, Kothaw ada, Warangal, do hereby solemnly affirm and state on oath as hereunder: 1 ) I a m t h e d e p o n en e n t h e r e i n a nd n d t h e t h i r d p a r ty t y t o t h e p r o c e e di di n g s and I acquainted w ith the follow ing facts of the case. 2 ) I s u b m i t t h at a t I k n ow o w t h e p a r t i es e s t o t h e s u it i t a n d t h e r e s p o nd nd e n t N o .1 . 1 a v ai a i l e d a n a m ou o u n t o f R s .5 . 5 , 0 0, 0 , 0 00 0 0 / - f r om o m t h e p e ti t i t i on on e r h e re r e i n a n d e x ec e c u te t e d t h e d e m an an d p r om o m i s so s o r y n o te t e o n 1 5 -0 -0 2 2010 in favour of the petitioner herein and the respondent N o.2 s t o o d as a s g u a ra r a n t o r t o t h e s a i d a v a i l ed e d l o a n am am o u n t . t ha ha t
t he he
r es e s po p o nd n d en en t
N o. o. 1
a cq c q ui u i re re d
t he he
p et e t it i t io io n
I s u b m it it s ch c h ed e d ul ul e
property and in order to defeat the claim of the petitioner the respondent No.1 entered into an agreement of sale with one C hi h i d ur u r al a l a L al a l i tth h a, a , W /o / o . R ag a g hu h u n at a t h a n d h e i s a ls l s o g oi oi n g t o e x ec e c u te t e r e g u la l a r R e gd g d . S a l e D ee e e d i n h e r f a v ou ou r. r. .
T h e f ac ac t s
stated above are true and correct and w ithin in my know ledge.
D EPON EN T V E RI R I F IC I C AT AT I ON O N : T h e d e po p o n en e n t , d o h e re r e b y s o le l e m nl n l y a ff ff i r m a n d a d mi m i t t ed e d t h e c o nt n t e nt n t s o f a ff f f i d av a v i t , v e ri r i f i ed e d a n d s i gn g n e d a ff f f i d av av i t before me on
day of N ovember, ovember, 2012 at H anumakonda.
AD A D V O C AT E
IN THE COURT OF T HE PRINC IPAL SENIOR C IVIL JUDGE AT WARANGAL I.A.No. In O.S.No.
of 2012. of 2012.
Betw een:Balne Nageshwar Rao
…
P e t i t i o ne r / Pl a i n t i ff
An A n d P ur ur a am m R am a m e sh s h K um u m ar a r & a no n o th t h er er …
R es e s p on o n de de nt n t s/ s / De D e fe f e nd n d an an ts ts
THIRD PARTY AFFIDAVIT
I, Banoth R edya N aik, S/o. Jagya N aik, Age: 40 years, Occu: Employee,
R/o.
H.No.2-25,
Devaraj
C o l o n y,
G o p a l p u r,
H asanparthy Mandal, Warangal D istrict, do hereby solemnly affirm and state on oath as hereunder: 3 ) I a m t h e d e p o n en e n t h e r e i n a nd n d t h e t h i r d p a r ty t y t o t h e p r o c e e di di n g s and I acquainted w ith the follow ing facts of the case. 4 ) I s u b m i t t h at a t I k n ow o w t h e p a r t i es e s t o t h e s u it i t a n d t h e r e s p o nd nd e n t N o .1 . 1 a v ai a i l e d a n a m ou o u n t o f R s .5 . 5 , 0 0, 0 , 0 00 0 0 / - f r om o m t h e p e ti t i t i on on e r h e re r e i n a n d e x ec e c u te t e d t h e d e m an an d p r om o m i s so s o r y n o te t e o n 1 5 -0 -0 2 2010 in favour of the petitioner herein and the respondent N o.2 s t o o d as a s g u a ra r a n t o r t o t h e s a i d a v a i l ed e d l o a n am am o u n t . t ha ha t
t he he
r es e s po p o nd n d en en t
N o. o. 1
a cq c q ui u i re re d
t he he
p et e t it i t io io n
I s u b m it it s ch c h ed e d ul ul e
property and in order to defeat the claim of the petitioner the respondent No.1 entered into an agreement of sale with one C hi h i d ur u r al a l a L al a l i tth h a, a , W /o / o . R ag a g hu h u n at a t h a n d h e i s a ls l s o g oi oi n g t o e x ec e c u te t e r e g u la l a r R e gd g d . S a l e D ee e e d i n h e r f a v ou ou r. r. .
T h e f ac ac t s
stated above are true and correct and w ithin in my know ledge.
D EPON EN T V E RI R I F IC I C AT AT I ON O N : T h e d e po p o n en e n t , d o h e re r e b y s o le l e m nl n l y a ff ff i r m a n d a d mi m i t t ed e d t h e c o nt n t e nt n t s o f a ff f f i d av a v i t , v e ri r i f i ed e d a n d s i gn g n e d a ff f f i d av av i t before me on day of N ovember, ovember, 2012 at H anumakonda.
AD A D V O C AT E
IN THE COURT OF T HE PRINC IPAL SENIOR C IVIL JUDGE AT WARANGAL I.A.No. In O.S.No.
of 2012. of 2012.
Betw een:Balne Nageshwar Rao
…
P e t i t i o n e r / P l a i n t i ff
An A n d P ur ur a am m R am a m e sh s h K um u m ar a r & a no n o th t h er er …
R es e s p on o n de de nt n t s/ s / De D e fe f e nd n d an an ts ts
A F F I D A V I T I , B a l n e N a g e s h w ar a r R a o , S / o . V e e r a s wa wa m y, y, A g e : 4 2 y e a r s , O cc c c u: u:
E mp m p l oy o y ee ee ,
R /o /o .
H .N . N o. o . 33 - 14 1 4 -2 - 2 66 6 6 /1 / 1 /A /A ,
G ou o u th t h am a m na n a ga g a r, r,
H anumakonda, Warangal, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm state on oath as follow s:
1 ) I a m t h e p et e t i ti t i on o n er e r h er e r ei e i n a nd n d p la l a in i n ttii ff ff i n t h he e a bo b o ve v e s u it it , a s such I know the facts of the case. 2 ) I s ub ub mi m i t t ha h a t I f il i l ed e d t he h e a b ov o v e s ui ui t f or o r r ec e c ov o v er e r y o f m on o n ey ey a g a i n s t t h e r e s po p o n d e n ts t s / d e f en e n d a n t s. s.
I n v i e w of o f t h e f a ct ct s a n d
circumstances stated in the plaint and petitions, the matter is u r g e n t. t.
H e n c e I p r a y t h e Ho H o n . C o u rt r t t o p a s s or o r d e r s t o ch ch e c k
a n d p u t u p t h e p la l a i n t a n d p et e t i t i o n s u rg r g e n t l y. y.
I n c a s e t h e r el el i e f
as prayed for is not granted I will be put to hardship. I submit t ha h a t i n o rd r d er er
t o a v oi o i d t he he
r ep ep et e t it i t io i o n o f f ac a c ts t s , t he he
p l ai a i nt nt
a ve v e rrm m en e n tts s m ay a y k in i n dl dl y b e r e ea a d a s p ar a r t a nd n d p ar a r ce c e l o f t hi hi s affidavit. I t i s t h e r e fo fo r e p r a y e d t h a t t h e H o n . C o u r t m a y b e p l e a s e d t o p a s s o r d e r s t o c h e c k a n d p u t u p t h e p l a i n t a n d p e t i t i o n s u r g e n t l y, y, in the interest of justice.
D EPON EN T V E RI R I F IC I C AT AT I ON O N : S o le l e m n ly l y a ff f f i rrm m e d a n d s i gn g n e d b y t h e d e po p o n en en t before me on this day of N ovember, 2012 at H anumakonda.
AD A D V O C AT E
IN THE COU RT OF PRINCI PAL SENIOR C IVIL JUDGE AT WARANGAL I.A.No. In O.S.No.
of 2012. of 2012.
Betw een:Balne N ageshw ar R ao, S/o. Veerasw amy, Ag A g e : 4 2 y e a r s , O c c u : E m p l o y e e , R / o . H .N . N o. o . 33- 1 14 4 -2 - 2 66 6 6 /1 / 1 /A /A , G ou o u th t h am a m na n a ga ga r, r, H anumakonda, Warangal. … An A n d
P e t i t i o ne r / Pl a i n t i ff
1) Puram Ramesh K u m a r, S/o. Pandarinath, Age: 46 years, Occu: Sr. As A s s t . i n K a k a t i y a U n i v e r s i t y, W o m e n PG C ollege, Subedari, R /o. H .N o.3-14562, KUC Road, Hanumakonda, Warangal. 2) Md. Yo u n u s Hussain, S/o. Altaf Hussain, Age: 40 years, Occu: E mp m p lo l o ye y e e, e, R /o /o . C /o / o .S . S DL DL CE CE , K UC UC , Warangal. … Respondents/Defendants
PET IT ION F ILED U N D ER R U LE 57 OF C .R .P. .P. R /W SEC T ION 151 OF C.P.C. C.P.C.
For the reasons and facts stated in the accompanying a ff ff i d da a v it i t , t h e p et e t it i t i on o n er e r p ra r a ys y s t h at at t h e H on o n . C ou o u rt r t m ay ay b e pleased to pass orders to check and put up the plaint and petitions urgently, in the interest of just ice.
D ate:
-11-2012. AD A D V O C AT E F O R P E T I T I O N E R / PLAINTIFF.
View more...
Comments
