ASME PTC 19.3-2010

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

Thermowells Performance Test Codes

A N A M E R I C A N N AT I O N A L STA N DA R D

Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

Thermowells Performance Test Codes

AN AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARD

Three Park Avenue • New York, NY • 10016 USA

Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

Date of Issuance: July 12, 2010

This Code will be revised when the Society approves the issuance of a new edition. There will be no addenda issued to PTC 19.3 TW-2010. ASME issues written replies to inquiries concerning interpretations of technical aspects of this document. Periodically certain actions of the ASME PTC Committee may be published as Code Cases. Code Cases and interpretations are published on the ASME Web site under the Committee Pages at http://cstools.asme.org as they are issued.

ASME is the registered trademark of The American Society of Mechanical Engineers. This code or standard was developed under procedures accredited as meeting the criteria for American National Standards. The Standards Committee that approved the code or standard was balanced to assure that individuals from competent and concerned interests have had an opportunity to participate. The proposed code or standard was made available for public review and comment that provides an opportunity for additional public input from industry, academia, regulatory agencies, and the public-at-large. ASME does not “approve,” “rate,” or “endorse” any item, construction, proprietary device, or activity. ASME does not take any position with respect to the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection with any items mentioned in this document, and does not undertake to insure anyone utilizing a standard against liability for infringement of any applicable letters patent, nor assumes any such liability. Users of a code or standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the risk of infringement of such rights, is entirely their own responsibility. Participation by federal agency representative(s) or person(s) affiliated with industry is not to be interpreted as government or industry endorsement of this code or standard. ASME accepts responsibility for only those interpretations of this document issued in accordance with the established ASME procedures and policies, which precludes the issuance of interpretations by individuals.

No part of this document may be reproduced in any form, in an electronic retrieval system or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher.

The American Society of Mechanical Engineers Three Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016-5990

Copyright © 2010 by THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS All rights reserved Printed in U.S.A.

Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

CONTENTS Foreword .............................................................................................................................................................................. Acknowledgments ................................................................................................................................................................ Committee Roster ................................................................................................................................................................ Correspondence With the PTC Committee .....................................................................................................................

v v vi vii

Section 1 1-1 1-2

Object and Scope .................................................................................................................................... Object ............................................................................................................................................................... Scope ................................................................................................................................................................

1 1 1

Section 2

Nomenclature ..........................................................................................................................................

2

Section 3 3-1 3-2

Jurisdiction of Codes ............................................................................................................................... Reference Standards and Governing Codes .............................................................................................. Specification of Thermowells .......................................................................................................................

4 4 4

Section 4 4-1 4-2

Dimensions ............................................................................................................................................. Configurations ............................................................................................................................................... Dimensional Limits .......................................................................................................................................

5 5 5

Section 5 5-1

Materials ................................................................................................................................................. General Considerations ................................................................................................................................

10 10

Section 6 6-1 6-2 6-3 6-4 6-5 6-6 6-7 6-8 6-9 6-10 6-11 6-12 6-13

Stress Equations ..................................................................................................................................... General Considerations ................................................................................................................................ Corrosion and Erosion .................................................................................................................................. Flow-Induced Thermowell Stresses ............................................................................................................ Strouhal Number, Drag Coefficients, and Lift Coefficient ...................................................................... Natural Frequency of Thermowells ............................................................................................................ Mounting Compliance Factor ...................................................................................................................... Unsupported Length, Diameter, and Fillet Radius .................................................................................. Frequency Limit ............................................................................................................................................. Magnification Factor ..................................................................................................................................... Bending Stresses ............................................................................................................................................ Pressure and Shear Stresses ......................................................................................................................... Steady-State Static and Dynamic Stress Limits ......................................................................................... Pressure Limit ................................................................................................................................................

11 11 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 21 21 24 24 27

Section 7 7-1 7-2 7-3 7-4 7-5 7-6 7-7 7-8 7-9 7-10

Overview of Calculations ......................................................................................................................... Quantitative Criteria ..................................................................................................................................... Fluid Properties .............................................................................................................................................. Fluid Velocity ................................................................................................................................................. Material Properties and Dimensions .......................................................................................................... Reynolds and Strouhal Numbers ................................................................................................................ Natural Frequency at Operation Temperature .......................................................................................... Natural Frequency at Expected Mode of Operation ................................................................................ Steady-State and Dynamic Stresses ............................................................................................................ Allowable Fatigue Limits ............................................................................................................................. Pressure Rating ..............................................................................................................................................

28 28 28 28 28 29 29 29 29 29 29

Section 8 8-1 8-2

Examples ................................................................................................................................................. Tapered, Welded Thermowell for a Steam-Header Application (U.S. Customary Units) .................. Step-Shank, Threaded Thermowell for a Hot Water Application (SI Units) .........................................

30 30 33

iii Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

Statement of Compliance ........................................................................................................................ Specification of a Thermowell ..................................................................................................................... Velocity and Pressure Ratings ......................................................................................................................

39 39 39

Section 10 References .............................................................................................................................................. 10-1 Referenced Documents ................................................................................................................................. 10-2 Referenced ASME Documents .....................................................................................................................

40 40 40

Figures 4-1-1 4-1-2 4-1-3 4-1-4 6-3.1-1 6-6-1 6-8.1-1

6 7 8 9 12 17

Section 9 9-1 9-2

19

6-10.7-1 6-10.7-2 6-10.7-3

Schematic Diagram of a Thermowell ........................................................................................................ Examples of Straight-Shank Thermowells ................................................................................................. Examples of Step-Shank Thermowells ....................................................................................................... Examples of Tapered Thermowells ............................................................................................................. Fluid-Induced Forces and Assignment of Axes for Calculation of Thermowell Stresses ................... Unsupported Length of Thermowells ........................................................................................................ Schematic Indicating Excitation of Resonances When Excitation Frequency Coincides With the Thermowell Natural Frequency .................................................................................................. Schematic Showing the Amplitude Response of a Thermowell Subjected to Fluid-Induced Forces as Solid Lines, for In-Line and Transverse Excitation Modes ........................... Bending Moment, Stress at the Support Plane, and Locations of Maximum Steady-State or Oscillating In-Line Stress .................................................................................................. Mounting of a Thermowell in an Elbow, With the Tip Facing Downstream ........................................ Geometry to Be Used in Calculation of Thermowell Ratings ................................................................. Mounting of a Thermowell in an Elbow, With the Tip Facing Upstream .............................................

Tables 4-1-1 4-2-1 6-5.3-1 6-12.3-1

Dimensional Limits for Straight and Tapered Thermowells Within the Scope of This Standard ...... Dimensional Limits for Step-Shank Thermowells Within the Scope of This Standard ....................... Parameters for Natural Frequency Calculation for Step-Shank Thermowells ..................................... Allowable Fatigue-Stress Amplitude Limits for Material Class A and Class B ....................................

7 8 15 26

Nonmandatory Appendix A Conversion Factors ........................................................................................................................................

41

6-8.1-2 6-10.1-1

iv Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

19 22 24 25 25

FOREWORD In 1957, the ASME Performance Test Codes Committee 19.3 determined that the 1930 edition of the Supplement on Temperature Measurement dealing with thermowells was unsatisfactory. Since the design of thermowells requires both thermal and stress considerations, the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Committee was approached for assistance. However, the special needs for the design of intrusive pipe fittings were deemed beyond the scope of what could be properly included in the vessel codes. The PTC 19.3 Committee is charged with temperature measurement and thermowell design. The purpose of the thermowell is to facilitate temperature measurement while resisting fluid forces of the process. This committee undertook the task of providing guidance in this area, on the basis of a paper authored by J. W. Murdock [1], ultimately leading to the publication of PTC 19.3-1974, Supplement on Instruments and Apparatus, Part 3, Temperature Measurement. Prior to the acceptance of PTC 19.3-1974, the incidence of thermowell failures during the start-up testing of high-pressure steam turbines was unacceptable; its subsequent use in steam services has been highly successful at preventing catastrophic thermowell failure. Since its publication, PTC 19.3 has received widespread acceptance and use in both steam and nonsteam applications outside the scope of the performance test codes. In 1971 an ASME ad hoc committee, PB51, under the jurisdiction of the PTC Board, was formed to assess the thermowell standard. This committee, designated PTC 19.3.1, produced a draft thermowell standard. In 1999, PTC 19.3 undertook the task of completing this draft. In the course of this effort, it was discovered that a number of thermowells designed to PTC 19.3-1974 but placed in nonsteam services suffered catastrophic failure. Review of the literature revealed that the PTC 19.3.1 draft did not incorporate recent, significant advances in our knowledge of thermowell behavior, and the committee decided to thoroughly rewrite the standard. The goals of the new Standard are to provide a thermowell rating method that can be used in a myriad array of services, including processes involving corrosive fluids; offer advice where fatigue endurance is critical; and establish criteria for insuring sensor reliability. These factors result in a more reliable basis for thermowell design than the PTC 19.3-1974 Supplement. It is intended that this edition of this Standard not be retroactive. PTC 19.3 TW on thermowells was approved by the PTC Standards Committee on January 15, 2010, and approved and adopted as a Standard practice of the Society by action of the Board on Standardization and Testing on February 18, 2010. It was also approved as an American National Standard by the ANSI Board of Standards Review on April 22, 2010.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Committee gratefully acknowledges the special contributions of R. D. Blevins, D. R. Frikken, W. J. Koves, and A. Löbig.

v Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

ASME PTC COMMITTEE Performance Test Codes (The following is the roster of the Committee at the time of approval of this Code.)

STANDARDS COMMITTEE OFFICERS M. P. McHale, Chair J. R. Friedman, Vice Chair J. H. Karian, Secretary

STANDARDS COMMITTEE PERSONNEL M. P. McHale, McHale & Associates, Inc. P. M. McHale, McHale & Associates, Inc. J. W. Milton, Reliant Energy S. P. Nuspl, Consultant R. R. Priestley, General Electric Co. J. A. Rabensteine, Environmental Systems Corp. J. A. Silvaggio, Jr., Siemens Demag Delaval Turbomachinery, Inc. W. G. Steele, Jr., Mississippi State University J. C. Westcott, Mustan Corp. W. C. Wood, Duke Power Co. T. K. Kirkpatrick, Alternate, McHale & Associates, Inc. J. A. Scavuzzo, Alternate, The Babcock & Wilcox Co.

P. G. Albert, General Electric Co. R. P. Allen, Consultant J. M. Burns, Burns Engineering W. C. Campbell, Southern Company Services M. J. Dooley, Sigma Energy Solutions J. R. Friedman, Siemens Energy, Inc. G. J. Gerber, Consultant P. M. Gerhart, University of Evansville T. C. Heil, Consultant R. E. Henry, Sargent & Lundy J. H. Karian, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers D. R. Keyser, Service Engineering S. J. Korellis, EPRI

PTC 19.3 COMMITTEE — TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT D. C. Ripple, Chair, National Institute for Standards & Technology J. H. Karian, Secretary, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers D. S. Bartran, Consultant D. Bauschke, Emerson Process Management C. W. Brook, Wika Instruments Ltd. M. Carugati, Alloy Engineering Co, Inc.

S. M. Dale, Conax Technologies LLC A. G. Gilson, Black & Veatch A. Heisler, Pyromation, Inc. F. L. Johnson, JMS Southeast, Inc. D. Marra, Florida Power Light J. W. Stevens, University of Colorado

vi Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE PTC COMMITTEE

General. ASME Codes are developed and maintained with the intent to represent the consensus of concerned interests. As such, users of this Code may interact with the Committee by requesting interpretations, proposing revisions, and attending Committee meetings. Correspondence should be addressed to Secretary, PTC Standards Committee The American Society of Mechanical Engineers Three Park Avenue New York, NY 10016-5990 http://go.asme.org/inquiry Proposing Revisions. Revisions are made periodically to the Code to incorporate changes that appear necessary or desirable, as demonstrated by the experience gained from the application of the Code. Approved revisions will be published periodically. The Committee welcomes proposals for revisions to this Code. Such proposals should be as specific as possible, citing the paragraph number(s), the proposed wording, and a detailed description of the reasons for the proposal, including any pertinent documentation. Proposing a Case. Cases may be issued for the purpose of providing alternative rules when justified, to permit early implementation of an approved revision when the need is urgent, or to provide rules not covered by existing provisions. Cases are effective immediately upon ASME approval and shall be posted on the ASME Committee Web page. Request for cases shall provide a Statement of Need and background information. The request should identify the Code, paragraph, figure or table number(s), and be written as a Question and Reply in the same format as existing Cases. Requests for Cases should also indicate the applicable edition of the Code to which the proposed Case applies. Interpretations. Upon request, the PTC Standards Committee will render an interpretation of any requirement of the Code. Interpretations can be rendered only in response to a written request sent to the Secretary of the PTC Standards Committee. The request for interpretation should be clear and unambiguous. It is further recommended that the inquirer submit his request in the following format: Subject:

Cite the applicable paragraph number(s) and a concise description.

Edition:

Cite the applicable edition of the Code for which the interpretation is being requested.

Question:

Phrase the question as a request for an interpretation of a specific requirement suitable for general understanding and use, not as a request for an approval of a proprietary design or situation. The inquirer may also include any plans or drawings that are necessary to explain the question; however, they should not contain proprietary names or information.

Requests that are not in this format will be rewritten in the appropriate format by the Committee prior to being answered, which may inadvertently change the intent of the original request. ASME procedures provide for reconsideration of any interpretation when or if additional information that might affect an interpretation is available. Further, persons aggrieved by an interpretation may appeal to the cognizant ASME Committee. ASME does not “approve,” “certify,” “rate,” or “endorse” any item, construction, proprietary device, or activity. Attending Committee Meetings. The PTC Standards Committee and its subcommittees, such as PTC 19.3, hold meetings or telephone conferences, which are open to the public. Persons wishing to attend any meeting or telephone conference should contact the Secretary of the PTC Standards Committee.

vii Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

viii Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

THERMOWELLS Section 1 Object and Scope 1-1 OBJECT

manufactured from pipe are outside the scope of this Standard. Thermowells with specially designed surface structures (e.g., a knurled surface or a surface with spiral ridges) are beyond the scope of this Standard, due to the difficulty of providing design rules with broad applicability for these types of thermowells. Thermowell attachment methods, standard dimensions, parasitic vibration of a sensor mounted inside the thermowell, and thermal equilibrium of the sensor relative to the process stream are beyond the scope of this Standard. In addition, thermowells fabricated by welding, including flame spray or weld overlays, at any place along the length of the shank or at the tip are outside the scope of this Standard.

The object of this Standard is to establish a mechanical design standard for reliable service of tapered, straight, and stepped-shank thermowells in a broad range of applications. This includes an evaluation of the forces caused by external pressure, and the combination of static and dynamic forces resulting from fluid impingement.

1-2 SCOPE This Standard applies to thermowells machined from bar stock and includes those welded to or threaded into a flange as well as those welded into a process vessel or pipe with or without a weld adaptor. Thermowells

1 Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

Section 2 Nomenclature For U.S. Customary units, lb denotes pound as a unit of mass, lbf denotes pounds-force, kip denotes 103 pounds-force, and ksi denotes 103 pounds-force per square inch or kips per square inch. When parameters are specified in mixed units within the U.S. Customary unit system (e.g., diameter B in inches, velocity V in feet per second), conversion factors between feet and inches will be needed in the calculations. See para. 6-4.1 and subsection 8-1 for examples. A 5 outside diameter of thermowell at support plane or root, based on which point is closest to the thermowell tip, m (in.) Ap 5 projected area of thermowell perpendicular to direction of flow and exposed to the flow stream, m2 (in.2) a 5 polynomial function used in eq. (6-8-4), dimensionless B 5 outside diameter at tip of thermowell, m (in.) b 5 fillet radius at the root of the thermowell shank, m (in.) bS 5 fillet radius at the base of the reduced-diameter length of a step-shank thermowell, m (in.) CD 5 coefficient for steady-state drag pressure, dimensionless Cd 5 coefficient for oscillating-drag (in-line with flow) pressure, dimensionless Cl 5 coefficient for oscillating-lift (transverse to flow) pressure, dimensionless c 5 corrosion allowance, m (in.) ci 5 coefficients used in eq. (6-5-3), dimensionless D 5 outside diameter at any cross section, m (in.) Da 5 average diameter of the thermowell, as defined in para. 6-5.3, Step 1, m (in.) d 5 bore diameter of thermowell, m (in.) E 5 modulus of elasticity at service temperature, Pa [psi or lb/(in.⋅sec2)] (Refer to Nonmandatory Appendix A and para. 6-5.3 for a discussion of units of E.) Eref 5 reference value of modulus of elasticity, Pa (psi) FD 5 in-line static drag force on thermowell, due to fluid impingement, N (lbf) Fd 5 in-line dynamic drag force on thermowell, due to fluid impingement, N (lbf) Fl 5 transverse dynamic drag force on thermowell, due to fluid impingement, N (lbf)

FM 5 magnification factor for thermowell oscillations transverse to fluid flow, dimensionless F’M 5 magnification factor for thermowell oscillations in-line with fluid flow, dimensionless f 5 frequency, Hz fa 5 approximate resonance frequency of thermowell, Hz c f n 5 resonance frequency of thermowell with compliant support, Hz fn 5 natural frequency with ideal clamping, Hz fS 5 vortex shedding frequency or rate, Hz G 5 parameter defined in eq. (6-10-3), dimensionless GRD 5 parameter G appropriate for evaluation of stress at the base of a reduced-diameter shank, dimensionless GSP 5 parameter G appropriate for evaluation of stress at the support point, dimensionless Gb 5 either GRD or GSP, dimensionless Ha,f 5 factor to account for added fluid mass, dimensionless Ha,s 5 factor to account for added sensor mass, dimensionless Hc 5 frequency factor to account for support or foundation compliance, dimensionless Hf 5 frequency factor to account for shear, rotation, taper, and tip-mass effects, dimensionless I 5 moment of inertia of cross section, kg⋅m2 (lb⋅in.2) KM 5 rotational stiffness of thermowell support, N⋅m/rad [(in.-lb)/rad] Kt 5 stress concentration factor, dimensionless L 5 unsupported length of thermowell, measured from the tip to the support plane, m (in.) L0 5 length of the thermowell shielded from fluid flow, m (in.) LS 5 length of reduced-diameter shank for a stepshank thermowell, m (in.) M 5 bending moment, N⋅m (in.-lb) Mb 5 bending moment for steady-state drag (for b 5 D), oscillating drag (for b 5 d), or lift (for b 5 l), N⋅m (in.-lb) 2

Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

m 5 mass per unit length of a thermowell of uniform cross section, kg/m (lb/in.) NS 5 Strouhal number, dimensionless NSc 5 Scruton number or mass damping factor, dimensionless P 5 operating pressure, Pa (psi) Pc 5 design static pressure of shank of thermowell, Pa (psi) PD 5 aerodynamic force per unit of projected area on thermowell, Pa (psi) Pd 5 oscillating-drag force per unit of projected area on thermowell, Pa (psi) Pf 5 design pressure for flange supporting thermowell, Pa (psi) Pl 5 oscillating-lift force per unit of projected area on thermowell, Pa (psi) Pr 5 external pressure rating of the thermowell, Pa (psi) Pt 5 design pressure of tip of the thermowell, Pa (psi) Pb 5 either PD, Pd, or Pl, Pa (psi)

SS5 shear stress, Pa (psi) St 5 tangential pressure stress, Pa (psi) Sz 5 longitudinal stress in the thermowell, Pa (psi) T 5 operating temperature, 8C (8F) Ta 5 ambient temperature, 8C (8F) t 5 minimum tip thickness of the thermowell, m (in.) V 5 process fluid velocity, m/s (in./sec) VIR 5 fluid velocity that excites the in-line resonance, m/s (in./sec) v 5 specific volume (reciprocal of the fluid density ), m3/kg (in.3/lb) xˆ 5 unit vector normal to the fluid velocity and to the axis of the thermowell y 5 distance from thermowell axis, m (in.) yˆ 5 unit vector pointing in the direction of the fluid flow z 5 distance from the thermowell root along the thermowell axis, m (in.) zs 5 distance from the thermowell root to the plane where stress is evaluated, m (in.) zˆ 5 unit vector along axis of the thermowell, pointing toward the tip a 5 average coefficient of thermal expansion, m/ (m⋅K) [in./(in.⋅8F)] b 5 parameter used in eq. (6-5-3), dimensionless m 5 dynamic fluid viscosity, Pa⋅s [lb/(ft⋅sec)]

Rp 5 pipe radius, m (in.) r 5 ratio of shedding frequency to natural frequency, dimensionless (lift resonance) r’ 5 ratio of shedding frequency to natural frequency, dimensionless (in-line resonance) Re 5 Reynolds number, calculated on the basis of the tip diameter: Re 5 BV /, dimensionless, or Re 5 BV/, dimensionless S 5 maximum allowable working stress, Pa (psi) Sa 5 axial pressure stress, Pa (psi) SD 5 steady-state drag stress due to fluid impingement, Pa (psi) Sd 5 oscillating-drag stress due to fluid impingement, Pa (psi) Sf 5 fatigue endurance limit, in the high-cycle limit, Pa (psi) SL 5 oscillating-lift stress due to fluid impingement, Pa (psi) Sr 5 radial pressure stress, Pa (psi)

Note: Viscosity is often given in the literature in units of centipoise, abbreviation cP. Useful conversion factors are 1 cP 5 0.67197 × 10−3 lb/(ft.⋅sec) and 1 cP 5 10−3 Pa⋅s.

 5 kinematic fluid viscosity, m2/s (ft2/sec)  5 fluid density, kg/m3 (lb/in.3) m 5 mass density of the thermowell material, kg/ m3 (lb/in.3) s 5 average density of a temperature sensor, kg/ m3 (lb/in.3)  5 damping factor, dimensionless s 5 2pfS, rad/s (rad/sec)

3 Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

Section 3 Jurisdiction of Codes Thermowells are an integral part of the piping system and the process containment system, and as a result, they may be subject to requirements from the governing piping or pressure vessel code.

of PTC 19.3 TW, which considers the vibration of single thermowells due to vortex shedding only. (c) Guidance on minimizing temperature measurement errors in thermowell applications is found in the latest edition of PTC 19.3. Effects considered include heating of the thermowell by fluid impingement, errors due to thermal radiation and conduction along the thermowell, and heat transfer between the thermowell and the surrounding fluid.

3-1 REFERENCE STANDARDS AND GOVERNING CODES (a) ASME B40.9, Thermowells for Thermometers and Elastic Temperature Sensors, discusses the selection, fabrication, and installation of thermowells, as well as providing some standardized designs. Complementing B40.9, PTC 19.3 TW is limited in scope to mechanical design of thermowells. (b) ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC) Section III Appendices, Appendix N provides guidance on the flow-induced vibration of banks or arrays of tubes and on the excitation of structural vibrations by turbulence. Both of these topics are outside the scope

3-2 SPECIFICATION OF THERMOWELLS Specification of a thermowell and the materials of construction are the sole responsibility of the designer of the system that incorporates the thermowell. Sole responsibility for ensuring compatibility of the process fluid with the system rests with the end user. Thermowells may be stated to be in conformance to this Standard, subject to the requirements of Section 9 of this Standard.

4 Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

Section 4 Dimensions 4-1 CONFIGURATIONS Figure 4-1-1 shows a schematic diagram of a thermowell, along with its characteristic dimensions. Typical thermowell attachment configurations include threaded, socket weld, weld-in, lap-joint (Van Stone), and integral-flanged as shown in Figs. 4-1-2, 4-1-3, and 4-1-4 (see also Table 4-1-1). These figures are representative of common practice but do not display all allowable attachment configurations. The selection of a specific attachment method is subject to the governing piping or pressure vessel code. Use of ball joints, spherical unions, or packing gland installations are not permissible in Performance Test Code applications. The dashed line in Fig. 4-1-1 indicates the support plane, which is an imaginary extension of the supporting-structure surface that passes through the shank of the thermowell. The unsupported length, L, is calculated as the distance from the tip of the thermowell to the intersection of the thermowell axis with this surface. For thermowells mounted on flanges or welded into weld adaptors, the support plane will be a flat plane. However, for thermowells mounted by direct welding into a pipe wall, the support plane will actually be a curved surface with the same curvature as the inner pipe wall. For this case, the support plane should be approximated as a plane located at a distance from the thermowell tip equal to the largest actual distance from the tip to any point on the true curved support surface. For thermowells welded to a flange or pipe wall at an angle, the support plane will not be normal to the thermowell axis. For nonstandard attachments, this Standard covers the design requirements of the thermowell only. The designer shall account for the support compliance of the attachment (refer to subsection 6-6), and the attachment method shall meet all the requirements of the governing piping or pressure vessel code.



A 5 thermowell outer diameter at the root of the thermowell shank, or at the support plane if the thermowell is firmly supported along its shank B 5 thermowell diameter at the tip d 5 bore diameter L 5 length of the thermowell from the tip to the support plane t 5 minimum thickness of the tip

For the purpose of defining L and A, the support plane shall also be defined (see subsection 6-7). The root of the thermowell is located where the thermowell shank makes a transition to (a) a machined transition to a flange, socket weld collar, or threaded section of the thermowell (b) a weld-joint transition to other piping components The Standard also applies to step-shank thermowells within the dimensional limits given in Table 4-2-1, where LS is the length of the reduced-diameter section of thermowell shank, in addition to the dimensions defined for Table 4-1-1. Refer to Fig. 4-1-1. Calculations should be made using the nominal dimensions provided that a corrosion allowance is not used (see subsection 6-2) and that the thermowell is fabricated with manufacturing tolerances of ±1% for lengths L and LS and ±3% for diameters A, B, and d. If tolerances for A, B, or d are not met, calculations shall be made according to subsection 6-2, using as the corrosion allowance the linear sum of the actual tolerance and any corrosion allowance. If tolerances for L or LS are not met, calculations shall be made assuming that the lengths L and LS each equal the nominal length plus the respective manufacturing tolerance. External pressure calculations shall be made based on the minimum material condition, as discussed in subsection 6-13. This Standard applies to thermowells with an as-new surface finish of 0.81 µm (32 µin.) Ra or better. Stress limits given in subsection 6-12 are not valid for thermowells manufactured with rougher surfaces.

4-2 DIMENSIONAL LIMITS This standard applies to straight and tapered thermowells within the dimensional limits given in Table 4-1-1, where

5 Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

Fig. 4-1-1  Schematic Diagram of a Thermowell L

� d b A

B

D � (A � B)/2

t

Support plane (a) Schematic, Cross-Sectional View of a Thermowell

L Ls � �

bs

b

d

A

B

t Support plane (b) Schematic, Cross-Sectional View of a Step-Shank Thermowell

6 Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

Fig. 4-1-2  Examples of Straight-Shank Thermowells

(a) Straight-Shank Threaded Thermowell

(c) Straight-Shank Flanged Thermowell

(b) Straight-Shank Socket Weld Thermowell (d) Straight-Shank Lap-Joint (Van Stone) Thermowell

Table 4-1-1  Dimensional Limits for Straight and Tapered Thermowells Within the Scope of This Standard Description

Symbol

Minimum

Maximum

Unsupported length

L

6.35 cm (2.5 in.) [Note (1)]

60.96 cm (24 in.) [Note (2)]

Bore diameter

d

0.3175 cm (0.125 in.)

2.0955 cm (0.825 in.)

Tip diameter

B

0.92 cm (0.36 in.)

4.65 cm (1.83 in.)

Taper ratio

B/A

0.58

1

Bore ratio

d/B

0.16

0.71

L/B

2

…

(B – d)/2

0.30 cm (0.12 in.)

…

Aspect ratio Minimum wall thickness

GENERAL NOTE: Limits in this table apply to the nominal dimensions of the thermowell. NOTES: (1) Thermowells of length less than the minimum specified require design methods outside the scope of this Standard. (2) The equations in this Standard are valid for thermowells longer than the maximum indicated; however, only single-piece, drilled bar-stock shanks are covered by this Standard.

7 Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

Fig. 4-1-3  Examples of Step-Shank Thermowells

(a) Step-Shank Threaded Thermowell (b2) Step-Shank Socket Weld Thermowell Installed in Sockolet Adapter

(b1) Step-Shank Socket Weld Thermowell Installed in Bored-Through Thermocouple Adapter (c) Step-Shank Flanged Thermowell

Table 4-2-1  Dimensional Limits for Step-Shank Thermowells Within the Scope of This Standard Description

Symbol

Minimum

Maximum

Unsupported length

L

12.7 cm (5 in.)

60.96 cm (24 in.)

Bore diameter

d

0.61 cm (0.24 in.)

0.67 cm (0.265 in.)

Step diameter ratio, for B = 1.270 cm (0.5 in.)

B/A

0.5

0.8

Step diameter ratio, for B = 2.223 cm (0.875 in.)

B/A

0.583

0.875

Length ratio

LS / L

0

0.6

0.30 cm (0.12 in.)

…

Minimum wall thickness

(B2 d)/ 2

Allowable Dimensions [Note (1)] Tip diameter

B

1.270 cm (0.5 in.) and 2.223 cm (0.875 in.)

GENERAL NOTE: Limits in this table apply to the nominal dimensions of the thermowell. NOTE: (1) The methods presented in this Standard apply for other tip diameters than those specified, but the correlation for natural frequency is supplied only for the given tip diameters.

8 Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

Fig. 4-1-4  Examples of Tapered Thermowells

(a) Tapered-Shank Threaded Thermowell

(c) Tapered-Shank Flanged Thermowell

(b) Tapered-Shank Socket Weld Thermowell Installed in Bored-Through Thermocouple Adapter (d) Tapered-Shank Weld-In Thermowell Installed Directly Into Pipe Wall

9 Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

Section 5 Materials 5-1 GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

is use of materials susceptible to stress corrosion cracking or embrittlement at the service conditions. The thermowell material used should be forged or bar stock and shall conform to the requirements of the governing code. In the absence of a governing code, other materials, which may or may not be ASTM, ANSI, or ASME approved, may be used when necessary, subject to the following requirements:

The system designer (see subsection 3-2) shall carefully consider, among other environmental conditions, the characteristics of the following to determine the proper material for the thermowell: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f)

process fluid pressure temperature fluid velocity application weldability

(a) The specific materials shall be agreed to by the designer and supplier of the thermowell. (b) Unlisted materials may be used provided they conform to a published specification covering chemical, physical, and mechanical properties; method and process of manufacture; heat treatment; and quality control, and otherwise meet the requirements of this Standard. (c) Allowable stresses shall be determined in accordance with the applicable allowable stress basis of this Standard or a more conservative basis.

In general, the choice of material shall be governed mainly by strength requirements and possible corrosion that the thermowell will encounter. Thermowells are subjected to sustained stress reversals with a very high number of cycles (see subsection 6-3), so the materials of construction shall be selected on the basis of resistance to corrosion and corrosion fatigue. Of particular concern

10 Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

Section 6 Stress Equations 6-1 GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

mal degradation of thermal performance include the following:

6-1.1 Overview of Design Criteria

(a) locating a larger fillet radius at the support plane (b) locating the support plane away from a weld or heat-affected zone of a weld (c) avoiding threaded installations

Thermowells shall be designed to withstand static pressure, steady-state fluid impingement, turbulence, and dynamic excitation due to von Karman vortices. Excitation by structure-born vibration is a possibility and should also be considered, but is not addressed by this Standard, since this type of excitation is determined by the design and support of the entire piping system. Consideration of these loads on a mechanical model of the thermowell results in pressure and velocity limits due to the combination of steady-state and oscillatory forces acting on the thermowell. In evaluating an existing design or in designing a thermowell for given applications, the complete range of operating conditions for the thermowell, from start-up to emergency conditions, shall be considered. Factors that reduce the thermal mass of the thermowell and measurement errors are those that tend to reduce strength. Thermowell design consists of achieving accurate and reliable temperature measurement without compromising mechanical integrity or fluid containment. In all cases, the mechanical strength requirements shall control.

6-1.2.2 Factors Improving Thermal Performance. Factors that improve thermal performance with minimal degradation of mechanical strength include the following: (a) use of the smallest practical bore size (b) insulation of the outside of the pipe to reduce heat flux along the sensor axis

6-2 CORROSION AND EROSION Refer to subsection 5-1 for considerations on materials selection for corrosive environments. For applications where corrosion or erosion of the outer thermowell surface cannot be avoided, the designer shall establish a corrosion allowance, c. It is emphasized that the use of a corrosion allowance alone is insufficient at ensuring structural integrity of the thermowell in cases when stress corrosion is present. When a corrosion allowance is included, thermowell ratings for maximum allowable pressure and maximum allowable fluid velocity shall be calculated for three cases:

6-1.2 Optimization of Thermowell Design Proper design of a thermowell requires that the sensor mounted inside the thermowell attain thermal equilibrium with the process fluid. Thermal modeling of the sensor response is outside the scope of this Standard (refer to the latest version of PTC 19.3 for guidance). This Section briefly summarizes general design rules that will optimize the sensor performance within the constraints of the mechanical strength requirements. A high fluid-velocity rating for the thermowell requires a sufficiently high natural frequency for the thermowell (subsection 6-8) and sufficiently low oscillatory stresses (subsection 6-10). Higher natural frequencies result from decreasing the unsupported length, L, increasing the support-plane diameter, A, and decreasing the tip diameter, B. Lower oscillatory stresses result from decreasing length L and increasing diameter A. A higher static pressure rating (subsection 6-13) requires increasing the value of tip diameter B. In contrast, good thermal performance favors increasing length L and decreasing diameters A and B.

(a) initial thermowell dimensions (b) a thermowell design with tip thickness t and outer diameter at the support plane, A, reduced by c; all other dimensions as in (a) (c) a thermowell design with tip thickness t and outer diameter at the tip, B, reduced by c; all other dimensions as in (a) Cases described in (b) and (c) are intended to approximate two extreme cases of corrosion and erosion: case (b), where the thermowell loses material at the root; and case (c), where the thermowell loses material at the tip. If finite element calculations are performed to determine this effect, assume that the value of c varies linearly along the length of the thermowell, from zero at the tip to c at the root for case (b), and from c at the tip to zero at the support plane for case (c).

6-1.2.1 Factors Improving Mechanical Strength.  Factors that improve mechanical strength with mini11

Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

Fig. 6-3.1-1  Fluid-Induced Forces and Assignment of Axes for Calculation of Thermowell Stresses

X V

Z

Y

In-line forces

Transverse forces

Fluid vortices downstream

The maximum allowable pressure and maximum allowable fluid velocity shall be the minimum of the values obtained for the three cases above.

interaction and at the same time retains sufficient accuracy for the reliable calculation of velocity ratings of the thermowell.

6-3 FLOW-INDUCED THERMOWELL STRESSES

6-3.2 Force Amplitudes The force amplitudes should be expressed as a force per unit area, Pb , acting on the projected area, Ap, of the thermowell, for that portion of the thermowell that is exposed to the flow stream. There are three cases:

6-3.1 Overview of Flow-Induced Stresses The flow-induced stresses are modeled as a distributed force acting on a flexible beam. The total force on the beam is proportional to the projected area of the thermowell normal to the flow direction. While the hydrostatic-pressure stresses control rupture strength of the thermowell, the bending stresses and the possibility of flow-induced resonance dominate its velocity rating. The pressure stresses are primarily circumferential, while the flow-induced stresses are in the form of longitudinal bending stresses. These are greatest at the support plane of the thermowell and distributed about the neutral axis as with any transversely loaded beam. The fluid forces acting on the thermowell are directed  along the flow direction y (drag) and transverse direction xˆ (lift) [2–4] as shown in Fig. 6-3.1-1. These can be represented as a vector acting on the centerline of the thermowell:

F(t) 5 [FD 1 Fd sin(2st)]yˆ 1 F1 cos(st)xˆ



FD 5 Ap PD

Fd 5 Ap Pd

Fl 5 Ap Pl

(6-3-2)

where subscript D 5 conventional steady-drag forces subscript d 5 oscillating-drag (in-line) forces subscript l 5 oscillating-lift (transverse) forces The symbol Pb is used below to denote any one of the three forces per unit area, PD, Pd, or Pl. Each of the forces should be interpreted as effective pressures, PD, Pd, and Pl, having the form

(6-3-1)

PD 5

1 2

 CDV 2

1 Pd 5  CdV 2 2

1 Pl 5  ClV 2  (6-3-3) 2

where CD, Cd, and Cl 5 constants (see para. 6-4.2) V 5 velocity of the process fluid  5 density of the process fluid

where fs 5 s/2p is the Strouhal frequency discussed in subsection 6-4. Forces acting along the flow direction are termed “in-line”; forces acting along a direction normal to the flow are termed “transverse.” Approximating the fluid forces as two orthogonal components normal to the thermowell axis greatly simplifies the fluid-structure

Summing the forces per unit area of eq. (6-3-3) over the thermowell projected area, while invoking a coherent vortex shedding process based on the vortex shedding rate at the tip, results in a conservative estimate 12

Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

of the excitation forces and resultant bending stresses. These assumptions result in a lower bound estimate of the conditions that lead to stress failure.

(d) The thermowell material is not subject to stress corrosion or embrittlement. The calculation of the external pressure rating (subsection 6-13) shall still be performed. Designers are cautioned that if the in-line resonance is excited at fluid velocities below 0.64 m/s (2.1 ft/ sec), sustained operation on resonance may damage the temperature sensor even if the risk of mechanical thermowell failure is very small.

6-3.3 Choice of Maximum Velocity Value In all cases, design calculations shall take into account the possibility of flow increases above the design rating of the mechanical equipment and for process upset conditions. Specific flow maximums should be used where such data are available. Examples include start-up, shutdown, process upset, and pressure-relief conditions. Pre-start-up conditions such as steam blows for pipe clean out shall also be considered. In the case of highpressure steam blows, the fluid velocities can greatly exceed 100  m/s (300  ft/sec), and thermowells shall be designed for these conditions.

6-3.7 Pulsed Flow The analysis of thermowell response to fluid flow in this document presumes a steady fluid velocity. Pulsating flows where the fluid velocity varies at a frequency close to the natural frequency of the thermowell can also excite thermowell vibrations. Thermowell failures have been attributed to the exposure of a thermowell to pulsating fluid flow (e.g., thermowell failures have been seen for installations close to the discharge of a centrifugal pump). Designers should consider possible sources of flow pulsations.

6-3.4 Flow-Induced Vibration of Thermowell Arrays This Standard addresses the vibration of a single thermowell in a fluid flow and does not address the interactions of multiple thermowells in close proximity. Flow-induced vibrations of arrays of tubes are discussed in ASME BPVC Section III-A, Appendix N, Section N-1300.

6-4 STROUHAL NUMBER, DRAG COEFFICIENTS, AND LIFT COEFFICIENT 6-4.1 Strouhal Number The shedding of vortexes by a thermowell subject to transverse fluid flow produces a periodic force on the thermowell [4, 5]. The frequency of the vortex shedding, fs, is related to the fluid velocity by the dimensionless Strouhal number, NS:

6-3.5 Turbulence-Induced Vibration of Thermowells This Standard addresses the dynamic vibration caused by vortex shedding but does not address the incoherent excitation of structural vibrations by broad-band, high-frequency turbulence. This excitation mechanism can be important for short, slender [e.g., 6  cm (2.5  in.) long by 1  cm (0.4  in.) diameter] thermowells in high flows. These cases require specialized analysis beyond the scope of the present Standard. ASME BPVC Section III-A, Appendix N, Section N-1340 provides guidance on turbulence-induced vibrations.



fs 5

s 2p

5 NS

V B



(6-4-1)

where B 5 tip diameter of the thermowell Machined thermowells of dimensions within the scope of this Standard have Strouhal numbers characteristic of rough-surfaced cylinders [6]. A correlation of available experimental data gives the Strouhal number as a function of the Reynolds number [7]:

6-3.6 Low Fluid Velocities At very low fluid velocities, the risk of thermowell failure is greatly reduced. The calculations of naturalfrequency and corresponding-frequency limits (subsections 6-5 to 6-8), steady-state stress (para. 6-12.2), and oscillating stress (para. 6-12.3) do not need to be performed provided the following criteria are met:

for 22 # Re , 1, 300  0.22(1 2 22 / Re )  2  0.213 2 0.0248  Log 10 ( Re / 1, 300 )  NS 5  3 5 10.0095  Log 10 ( Re / 1, 300 )  for 1,300 # Re , 5 3 10  0.22 for 5 3 10 5 # Re , 5 3 107 

(a) The process fluid has a maximum velocity less than 0.64 m/s (2.1 ft/sec). (b) The thermowell dimensions satisfy the limits (1) A 2 d > 9.55 mm (0.376 in.) (2) L < 0.61 m (24 in.) (3) A > B > 12.7 mm (0.5 in.) (c) The thermowell material satisfies S  >  69  MPa (10 ksi) and Sf > 21 MPa (3 ksi).



(6-4-2)

In eq. (6-4-2), the Reynolds number is calculated using the tip diameter:

Re 5

VB m

or

13 Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

Re 5

VB n

(6-4-3)

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

where m 5 dynamic viscosity n 5 kinematic viscosity r 5 fluid density at flowing conditions For thermowell design, the Strouhal number may also be calculated from a simplified, conservative approximation of eq. (6-4-2):

NS ≅ 0.22

Finally

(6-4-4)

5 (100,000 lb/hr)(1 hr/3,600 sec)/ (0.19635 ft2) 5 141.47 lb/(ft2⋅sec) Re 5 BVr /m 5 0.052083 ft 3 141.47 lb/(ft2?sec)/2.07 3 10−5 lb/(ft?sec) 5 3.56 3 105

6-4.2 Drag and Lift Coefficients

For Reynolds numbers above approximately 100, the Strouhal number depends only weakly on the value of fluid viscosity. For a Reynolds number between 103 and 5 3 105, the viscosity needs to be known only to within a factor of 2. For Reynolds numbers greater than 5 3 105, the viscosity needs to be known only well enough to confirm that Re . 5 3 105. References [8, 9, and 17] should be consulted for typical viscosity values. If the viscosity is difficult to determine, eq. (6-4-4) should be used for the Strouhal number.

For design purposes, the eq. (6-3-3) coefficients for conventional-drag, oscillating-drag, and oscillating-lift pressures shall be

6-4.1.1 Example.  Superheated steam at a temperature of 1,000°F and a pressure of 2,000  psig flows through a pipe of 6-in. diameter at 100,000 lb/hr, past a thermowell with a tip diameter of 0.625 in. What is the Reynolds number?

The natural frequency of transverse vibrations of a thermowell mounted to a support is a function of



CD 5 1.4 Cd 5 0.1 Cl 5 1.0

(6-4-5)

6-5 NATURAL FREQUENCY OF THERMOWELLS 6-5.1 Transverse Vibrations

(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f)

(a) Calculation in SI Units From steam tables [8, 9], the dynamic fluid viscosity m 5 3.079 3 10−5 Pas. Input parameters for the Reynolds number calculation are B 5 0.625 in. 3 (0.0254 m/in.) 5 0.015875 m Pipe radius 5 Rp 5 (6 in./2)(0.0254 m/in.) 5 0.0762 m Pipe area 5 pRp2 5 0.018241 m2 rV 5 (density) 3 (flow velocity) 5 (mass flow rate) / (pipe area) 5 (100,000 lb/hr)(0.454 kg/lb)(1 hr/ 3,600 sec) /(0.018241 m2) 5 691.36 kg/(m2s) Finally Re 5 BVr/m 5 0.015875 m 3 691.36 kg/ (m2?s/3.079 3 10−5 Pa?s) 5 3.56 3 105

elastic properties of the thermowell mass per unit length shear and rotational inertia at small values of L/A support compliance added mass of the fluid added mass of the sensor

The formulas of subsection 6-5 establish a conservative estimate of the natural frequency of common industrial thermowells by applying a series of correction factors to an idealized beam having the mean dimensions of the actual thermowell. Nonuniform cross sections, shear, and rotational inertia are all accounted for using the frequency factor, Hf , in para. 6-5.3, Step 3. Foundation compliance, accounted for with the compliance factor, Hc , is treated in subsection 6-6. The added mass of the fluid is accounted for with the factor Ha,f , and added sensor mass is accounted for with Ha,s. While there are an infinite number of vibrational modes for a thermowell, the lowest-order resonance (i.e., the natural frequency including effects of support compliance), f nc , controls the onset of flow-induced resonance.

6-5.2 Finite Element Methods

(b) Calculation in U.S. Customary Units

The natural frequency of a thermowell may be calculated using finite element methods, provided the software is validated by comparison of calculated frequencies with the results obtained in para. 6-5.3.

From steam tables [8, 9], the dynamic fluid viscosity m 5 2.07 3 10−5 lb/(ft⋅sec). Input parameters for the Reynolds number calculation are B 5 0.625 in. 3 (1 ft/12 in.) 5 0.052083 ft Pipe radius 5 R 5 (6 in./2)(1 ft/12 in.) 5 0.25 ft Pipe area 5 pR2 5 0.19635 ft2 rV 5 (density) 3 (flow velocity) 5 (mass flow rate)/(pipe area)

6-5.3 Calculations and Correction Factors  Step 1. Calculate an average outer diameter, Da, for the thermowell. For straight thermowells, Da is the outer shank diameter. For tapered thermowells, set Da  5  (A  +  B)/2. For step-shank thermowells, set Da 5 A. 14

Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

Step 2. Calculate the approximate natural frequency of the thermowell as fa 5



1.8752  EI  2p  m 

1/2

1

2

Table 6-5.3-1  Parameters for Natural Frequency Calculation for Step-Shank Thermowells

L

where E 5 elastic modulus at the operating temperature I 5 p(Da4 – d4)/64, the second moment of inertia L 5 unsupported length of the thermowell m 5 rmp (Da2 – d2)/4, the mass per unit length of the thermowell When performing calculations with U.S. Customary units, and when E is given in units of pounds per square inch (equivalent to lbf/in.2, or psi), the conversion factor 386.088 in.-lb 5 1 lbf?sec2 is used to convert the units of E to pounds per inch per second squared. See para. 8-1.2 for an example. Step 3. Calculate the correction factor, Hf, for deviations from a solid beam of uniform cross section. For straightshank or tapered thermowells, use the correlation

Hf 5

2 0.99 1 1 (1 2 B/A ) 1 (1 2 B/A )  3[120.8 ( d / Da )] 1 1 1.1 ( Da/L )



(6-5-2)

(6-5-3)



c3

20.091

20.022

c4

1.132

1.022

c5

21.714

22.228

c6

0.865

1.594

c7

0.861

1.313

c8

1.000

0.362

c9

9.275

8.299

c10

27.466

25.376

Ha,s = 1 −

fn 5 Hf Ha,f Ha,s fa

(6-5-6)

6-6 MOUNTING COMPLIANCE FACTOR The natural frequency, fn, of a cantilever beam is calculated assuming an ideal, rigid base. In practice, however, this ideal is never achieved, and it is necessary to account for a significant reduction in natural frequency that results from flexibility of the thermowell mount or support [10]. The in situ natural frequency of the mounted thermowell is expressed in terms of a support flexibility or compliance factor, Hc, as

Step 4. Calculate the added mass correction factor for the fluid, Ha,f  :  2m

1.407 20.839

Step 6. The lowest-order natural frequency of the thermowell with ideal support is given by

where the parameters ci are given in Table 6-5.3-1, and LS is the length of the reduced-diameter section of the thermowell. Interpolation is not allowed between the entries for Table 6-5.3-1, although the designer may use appropriate beam models or finite-element methods to determine the Hf for thermowells of other dimensions. The value of Hf will be approximately 1 for slender thermowells with L/A . 10 and A 5 B. For short thermowells or for those for which A  B, values of Hf will depend in detail on the taper ratio, bore diameter, and existence of any step; values may vary from approximately 0.6 to 1.5.

H a, f = 1 −

1.410 20.949

 s  1 (6-5-5)   2 2m  (Da/d ) − 1    where rs 5 average density of the temperature sensor to be inserted in the thermowell. For a sensor with compacted, mineral-insulated, metal-sheathed construction (either resistance thermometer or thermocouple), a typical sensor density is rs 5 2 700 kg/m3 (169 lb/ft3), and this value should be used in the absence of detailed information on the sensor design. Alternatively, set Ha,s 5 0.96 for a 0.25-in. nominal sensor diameter, or Ha,s 5 0.93 for a 0.375-in. nominal sensor diameter.

21/b



c1 c2

Step 5. Calculate the sensor-mass correction factor Ha,s:

For step-shank thermowells of nominal 0.66-cm (0.26-in.) bore, and tip diameters of either 1.27  cm (0.5 in.) or 2.22 cm (0.875 in.), use the correlation



B = 1.27 cm (0.50 in.)

or alternatively, set Ha,f 5 1.0 exactly for steam service or similar low-density gas, or Ha,f 5 0.94 for liquid water. For a highly dense liquid, Ha,f may be considerably lower (e.g., Ha,f 5 0.90 for a fluid density of 1 600 kg/m3 and a thermowell density of 8 000 kg/m3).

where A 5 thermowell diameter at the support plane B 5 thermowell diameter at the tip Da 5 average thermowell diameter 5 (A + B)/2 d 5 bore diameter

H f 5 ( y12b 1 y 22b ) y1 5 [ c1 ( A / B) 1 c2 ] (LS / L) 1 [ c3 ( A / B) 1 c4 ] A / B) 1 c6 ] (LS / L) 1 [ c7 ( A / B) 1 c8 ] y 2 5 [ c5 (A b 5 [ c9 ( A / B) 1 c10 ]

B = 2.22 cm (0.875 in.)

Parameters

(6-5-1)

(6-5-4)



f nc = H c f n

15 Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

(6-6-1)

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

The foundation compliance is highly sensitive to the radius of curvature b of the thermowell shank and support transition (see Fig. 4-1-1). For cases where the support plane for the thermowell is at the thermowell root with fillet radius b [e.g., see Fig. 4-1-4, illustration (c) or (d)], the general form of the mounting-compliance frequency factor is

Hc 5 1 2

(

4

p A 2d

1

4

)

( K M / E) 32 L[1 1 1.5(b / A)]2



thermowell. The increased susceptibility of small-bore fittings to vibration fatigue is well known, and practices designed to minimize the risk of cantilevered small-bore fittings also apply to thermowell connections and electrical-connection-head top works.

6-7 UNSUPPORTED LENGTH, DIAMETER, AND FILLET RADIUS

(6-6-2)

For the purpose of calculating the natural frequency of a thermowell, the unsupported length L shall be taken as the axial distance from the tip of the thermowell to the point where the thermowell is rigidly supported. The effect of support compliance (flexibility) is included by a series of correction factors applied to the ideal case. In some installations, or for some varieties of thermowells, the definition of the unsupported length and the corresponding diameter A and fillet radius b is not obvious. Guidance for a variety of thermowell types is given below and illustrated in Fig. 6-6-1.

where A 5 root diameter of the thermowell b 5 fillet radius at the root of the thermowell E 5 elastic modulus of the thermowell material KM 5 rotational stiffness of the thermowell support (discussed below) L 5 unsupported length of the thermowell When the fillet radius at the root of the thermowell, b, is not known, it shall be set to zero. For weld-in installations where the weld fillet is not located directly at the root of the thermowell, the fillet radius b is not equivalent to the fillet radius of the weld. Instead, the value of b shall be determined from the fillet geometry at the root. For cases in which the support plane of the thermowell has a geometry without a clear fillet at the support plane (e.g., see the indicated unsupported length in Fig. 6-6-1 for socketweld or weld-in thermowells), set b equal to zero. The stiffness, KM, relates the angular displacement, du, of the thermowell at its support plane to a bending moment, M, applied to the thermowell:

(a) Lap-Joint and Flanged Thermowells. For flanged thermowells, the unsupported length extends from the tip of the thermowell to the flanged face that is part of the machined thermowell. (b) Threaded Thermowells. A threaded connection has greater compliance than a semi-infinite base. If the unsupported length is taken as the distance between the tip of the thermowell and the first engagement of the thread, then the increased compliance of the threaded joint (not including any additional compliance of the piping beyond the joint) should be accounted for by using

(6-6-3)

KM   5 M



For a beam of uniform circular cross section with outside diameter D supported by a semi-infinite base of the same modulus as the thermowell material, KM is given by

KM 5

D 0.787  2  E

(6-6-4)

Since the base compliance depends predominantly on the root diameter, eq. (6-6-2) should be applied to thermowells of general geometry by replacing D with A. Approximating A4  –  d4 by 0.99A4, one obtains for a semi-infinite base

H c 5 1 2 (0.61)

( A / L) [1 1 1.5(b / A)]2



(6-7-1)

The support-point diameter, A, shall be equal to the diameter of the thermowell shank at the beginning of the transition to the threaded section of the thermowell. Although there may be a fillet between the shank and the threaded portion of the thermowell, this fillet does not effectively reduce the bending compliance of the thermowell or reduce stress concentration at the threads. Consequently, the fillet radius shall be taken as b 5 0. (c) Socket-Weld Thermowells. The clearance between a socket adaptor and the thermowell wall is sufficiently large that the joint between the adaptor and thermowell wall cannot be treated as an interference fit. In this case, the unsupported length extends from the tip of the thermowell to the point on the thermowell where the socket is welded to the adaptor. For design purposes, this point shall be taken as the midpoint of the thermowell weld collar, as indicated in Fig. 6-6-1. The base diameter, A, shall be taken as the diameter of the thermowell shank at the transition to the weld collar, and the fillet radius shall be taken as b 5 0. (d) Weld-In Thermowells. The unsupported length will depend on how far the thermowell is inserted into the pipe and on the degree of penetration of the weld. Weld

3



H c 5 1 2 0.9 ( A / L)

(6-6-5)

The value of KM attained in practice may be significantly less than that of eq. (6-6-4), due either to the flexibility of the supporting piping or to the flexibility of the thermowell attachment to the piping [11]. Reference [11], models of the piping system under static load, or literature results should be used to determine KM. For thermowells installed in thin-wall pipes with outer connection heads, the mass of the head will cause a significant perturbation on the resonance frequency of the 16

Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

Fig. 6-6-1  Unsupported Length of Thermowells

Unsupported length

Unsupported length

(a) Threaded Thermowell

(d) Flanged Thermowell

Unsupported length

Unsupported length

Thermowell weld collar (b) Socket Weld Thermowell (e) Lap-Joint (Van Stone) Thermowell

Thermowell weld collar

Unsupported length

Unsupported length

Do not bottom thermowell in fitting (c) Socket Weld Thermowell (f) Tapered-Shank Weld-In Thermowell Installed Directly Into Pipe Wall

17 Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

specifications and tolerances for those specifications shall be taken into account when determining the unsupported length, which shall be taken as the longest length possible within the weld and location tolerances. Eqs. (6-6-2) and (6-6-5) for thermowell bending compliance and eq. (6-12-4) for stress-concentration factor apply only for weld fillets on the inside of the pipe. Consequently, the fillet radius shall be taken as b 5 0 even if there is a substantial fillet on the outside of the pipe. (e) Thermowells With Support Collars. Support collars or other means of support are outside the scope of the Standard. The use of support collars is not generally recommended, as rigid support can be obtained only with an interference fit between the support collar and the installed piping. In special cases, small supportcollar gaps filled with a viscous process fluid may add significant damping, thereby suppressing thermowell resonances, and engineering models that account for the degree of support and fluid damping may be useful. Such designs require methods beyond the scope of this Standard. If a section of thermowell shank of increased diameter is used in the support-collar design, the added mass will shift the natural frequency of the thermowell, and the correlations for natural frequency supplied in this Standard do not apply. Note that for Fig. 6-6-1, illustrations (b) and (c), the support plane for the thermowell is located at the intersection of the seal weld and the clearance gap between the thermowell shank and the adaptor. Such cases where the thermowell root is geometrically similar to a crack have reduced fatigue strength and should be avoided when the limiting factor for the thermowell velocity rating is fatigue strength.

line response. These should not be confused with the critical velocity marking the transition to turbulent boundary-layer flow. Since the in-line force fluctuates at twice the frequency of the lift excitation, the corresponding velocity critical is approximately one-half that required for lift resonance. For any given fluid velocity, both forces are acting on the thermowell with the result that the tip of the thermowell sweeps out an orbital (Lissajou figure) that changes shape as the fluid velocity is increased. If the natural frequency of the thermowell overlaps with either fs or 2fs, a large resonant buildup in vibration amplitude can occur, resulting in failure of either the thermowell or the temperature sensor mounted in the thermowell (see Fig. 6-8.1-1). Because fs is proportional to fluid velocity V, the in-line resonance occurs at half the velocity of the transverse resonance. Although the in-line force is only weakly excited, large vibration amplitudes may still be encountered due to the low damping of typical thermowells [3, 12–15]. The vibration amplitude is proportional to the force per unit area exerted by the fluid (see para. 6-3.2 and subsection 6-10) and the magnification factor (see subsection 6-9). Figure 6-8.1-2 illustrates the variation of vibration amplitude with fluid velocity. Because the elastic response of the thermowell and the vortex shedding process are so closely coupled, the actual vortex shedding process is extremely nonlinear and can be expected to be captured or locked onto the structural resonance of the thermowell [2]. This capture takes place as the vortex shedding rate approaches a natural frequency of the thermowell. As the beam responds, the vortex shedding rate tends to settle onto the resonant frequency of the beam and remains locked in for a considerable range of fluid velocities (refer to paras. 6-8.4 and 6-8.5). The natural frequency of thermowells may be as high as several thousand hertz; together with the lock-in phenomenon, it is possible for a thermowell to encounter many thousands of fatigue cycles in a single start-up process, even if the vortex shedding rate does not coincide with the natural frequency of the thermowell during steady-state process conditions. To prevent the occurrence of lock-in phenomena and to limit the buildup of vibration amplitudes to a safe value, the resonant frequency of the installed thermowell shall be sufficiently higher than either the in-line or the transverse resonance condition. Operation of the thermowell through the in-line resonance is allowed only if the cyclic stresses at the resonance condition are acceptably small (see paras. 6-8.4 and 6-8.5). The user is cautioned, however, that even if a thermowell is sufficiently strong to withstand in-line resonance, tip vibration at an in-line resonance may be extreme, leading to sensor degradation or destruction. In all cases, operation near the transverse resonance condition shall be avoided completely, other than exceptions discussed in para. 6-12.5.

6-8 FREQUENCY LIMIT 6-8.1 Overview When a thermowell is immersed in a flowing fluid, the shedding of vortices produces the following two types of force on the thermowell (see Fig. 6-3.1-1): (a) an oscillating-lift force, transverse to the fluid flow at frequency fs (b) an oscillating-drag force, in-line with the fluid flow at frequency 2fs As the fluid velocity is increased, the rate of vortex shedding increases linearly while the magnitude of the forces increases with the square of the fluid velocity. The thermowell responds elastically according to the force distribution and its variation in time. Should the vortex shedding rate coincide with the natural frequency of the thermowell, resonance occurs and is attended with a dramatic increase in the dynamic bending stresses. The fluid velocity at which this takes place is referred to as a velocity critical. There are a minimum of two velocity criticals for each natural frequency of the thermowell: one describing the lift and the other describing the in18

Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

Fig. 6-8.1-1  Schematic Indicating Excitation of Resonances When Excitation Frequency Coincides With the Thermowell Natural Frequency Frequency

In-line (drag) excitation Transverse (lift)

fn

Nominal resonance condition Approximate lock-in range Fluid Velocity GENERAL NOTE: Lock-in between the fluid vortices and the thermowell mechanical resonances can cause a resonance condition within the approximate boundaries indicated by the gray boxes.

Vibration Amplitude

Fig. 6-8.1-2  Schematic Showing the Amplitude Response of a Thermowell Subjected to Fluid-Induced Forces as Solid Lines, for In-Line and Transverse Excitation Modes fs � 0.4fnc

fs � 0.8fnc In-line resonance

Transverse resonance

Fluid Velocity GENERAL NOTE: The frequency limits discussed in paras. 6-8.2 to 6-8.4 are shown as dotted lines. The figure ignores lock-in effects, which can shift the locations of the resonances, as shown in Fig. 6-8.1-1.

If NSc  .  2.5 and Re  ,  105, in-line resonance is suppressed, and the installed natural frequency of the thermowell shall satisfy

6-8.2 Frequency Limit for Low-Density Gases For fluids of sufficiently low density and with Re , 105, the intrinsic damping of the thermowell sufficiently suppresses the in-line vibrations due to vortex shedding. The intrinsic damping factor, z, of common thermowells should be conservatively set at 0.0005 [2]. Values of z known from direct modal measurements should be used, although the designer is cautioned that the damping factor is not highly reproducible among multiple thermowells of similar design and may depend on details of the thermowell mounting, such as gasket choice for flanged thermowells. Calculate the mass damping factor, or Scruton number, as

NSc 5 p2  (rm / r)[1 2 (d/B)2]



fS , 0.8 f nc

(6-8-2)

If NSc . 64 and Re , 105, both transverse and in-line resonances are suppressed. Designs for a fluid velocity beyond the limit of eq. (6-8-2) are possible but shall consider the excitation of higher-order thermowell resonances. These calculations are beyond the scope of this Standard. If NSc # 2.5 or Re $ 105, the limits of 6-8.3 shall apply.

(6-8-1) 19

Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

6-8.4 Frequency Limit When the In-Line Resonance Does Not Limit Operation

6-8.3 Frequency Limit for the General Case If the conditions in para. 6-8.2 do not apply, establish the frequency limit of the thermowell as described in the following four steps:

In cases where the thermowell passes the cyclic stress condition for operation at the in-line resonance condition, care shall still be taken that in steady state the flow condition will not coincide with the thermowell resonance. The steady-state fluid velocity should meet one of the following conditions:

Step 1. If the damping factor is known, set the magnification factor FM′ for in-line resonance to 1/(2z). Otherwise, set the amplification factor for in-line resonance to 1/ (2z) 5 1,000, an upper limit for amplification exactly on resonance. The requirement that the natural resonance coincides with the in-line resonance also fixes the amplification factor for the transverse resonance to a value of 4/3 [obtained by evaluating eq. (6-9-1) with r 5 0.5]. If the Strouhal number is calculated with the correlation of eq. (6-4-2), set the fluid velocity for the in-line resonance to  Bf nc   2NS  c  Bf n VIR 5   2NS  c  Bf n  2NS 

22m  22m   1 2 B V  1 B





In cases where the thermowell design fails the cyclic stress condition for steady-state operation, transient exposure to the in-line resonance condition may be allowable, provided that certain criteria are met. A thermowell with a natural-frequency intermediate between the steady-state Strouhal frequency (which excites transverse vibrations) and twice the Strouhal frequency (which excites in-line vibrations) is subjected to large-amplitude vibration only for limited periods on start-up or shutdown, as the in-line vibrations are excited only when twice the Strouhal frequency coincides with the natural frequency of the thermowell. Passage through the in-line resonance is allowed only if all of the following conditions are met:

for 5 3 10 5 # Re , 107

(6-8-3) a( R) = 0.0285R 2 − 0.0496 R R = Log 10 (Re / Re0 ) Re0 = 1, 300



(6-8-4)

Bf nc 2NS



(a) The process fluid is a gas. (b) The thermowell is exposed to the in-line resonance condition only on start-up, shutdown, or other infrequent transient variations in fluid velocity. (c) The sustained or steady-state peak stress is less than the fatigue limit for the number of cycles. (d) The process fluid is known to not cause metallurgical changes to the thermowell material that would significantly reduce the fatigue resistance. (e) The potential consequences of thermowell failure to equipment or personnel are sufficiently limited to be acceptable. The number of cycles sustained for each flow-velocity transient shall be calculated assuming that lock-in phenomena occurs for a range of forcing frequencies equal to 20% of the natural frequency. If the criteria above are met, the designer shall evaluate the maximum stresses when the thermowell is excited at its natural frequency, in accordance with subsection 6-12, and determine whether the thermowell has sufficient fatigue strength for the expected number of start-up and shutdown events encountered by the thermowell in its lifetime.

(6-8-5)

Step 3. If the thermowell passes the cyclic stress condition [eq. (6-12-1)] for operation at the in-line resonance condition, the installed natural frequency, f nc , shall satisfy fS < 0.8 f nc

(6-8-6)

Step 4. If the thermowell fails the cyclic stress condition for operation at the in-line resonance condition, the installed natural frequency, f nc, shall be high enough to limit excitation of the in-line resonance, as shown in Figs. 6-8.1-1 and 6-8.1-2. In this case, f nc shall satisfy

(6-8-9)

6-8.5 Passing Through the In-Line Critical

Step 2. Evaluate the cyclic drag stress following subsection 6-12. The cyclic lift stress should be neglected in evaluating the peak oscillatory bending stress [see eq. (6-10-6) and paras. 6-10.2 to 6-10.5].



0.6 f nc , fS (steady state) , 0.8 f nc

Graphically, these conditions are equivalent to operation at a fluid velocity intermediate between the two gray boxes in Fig. 6-8.1-1.

  Bf nc   a(R) 5 Log 10  1 2   for 1, 300 # Re , 5 3 10 NS  2NSV   

VIR =

(6-8-8)

or

and NS is evaluated at the design velocity V, and not at the value VIR [the factors to the right of ( Bf nc ) ( 2NS ) correct for the difference in NS at V and at VIR]. If the Strouhal number is calculated with the simplified relation of eq. (6-4-4), set the fluid velocity for the in-line resonance to

fS (steady state) < 0.4 f nc

for 22 # Re , 1, 300

 where



fS < 0.4 f nc

(6-8-7) 20

Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

Note that the design rules of PTC 19.3 TW ensure only the mechanical integrity of the thermowell. Passage through the in-line resonance may cause a severe vibration of the thermowell tip resulting in unacceptable sensor damage or drift.

in special cases where a thermowell is supported along its shank, the support plane will be at the thermowell root. As shown in Fig. 6-10.1-1, stresses for fluid-flow-induced forces are obtained from the relation between the second moment of the beam, M, the moment of inertia, I, and the longitudinal stress in the thermowell:

6-9 MAGNIFICATION FACTOR 6-9.1 Magnification Factor Away From Resonance



The magnification factor, FM, equals the ratio of thermowell deflection and stress at a given frequency to the deflection and stress at zero frequency. For frequencies outside the lock-in band of the vortex frequency [the lock-in band is equivalent to an r value in eqs. (6-9-1) and (6-9-2) in the range 0.8 , r , 1.2] and at frequencies low enough that only the natural frequency of the thermowell is appreciably excited, the simple expressions below accurately model the magnification factor. In the case of transverse lift resonance, the magnification factor is FM 5

r5

Eq. (6-10-1) is evaluated at x 5 0, y 5 D(zs)/2 (steadystate and oscillating-drag stresses) or x 5 D(zs)/2, y 5 0 (oscillating-lift stresses), and z 5 zs, where zs is equal to either zero for evaluation of stress at the support plane, or to the distance from the support plane of the thermocouple to the cross section where the stress is evaluated. [For the common case of a thermowell supported at its root, eq. (6-10-1) is evaluated at z 5 0 and either x 5 0, y 5 A/2, or x 5 A/2, y 5 0.] The general equation relating peak-second moment for each type of force acting on the thermowell is

1 12 r 2 fs f



(6-9-1)

c n

f nc being the natural frequency of the thermowell includ-

r′ 5

1 1 − (r′) 2 fs

2



(6-9-2)

f nc

6-9.2 Magnification Factor Near Resonance



When the natural frequency of the thermowell falls within the lock-in band of the vortex frequency, the thermowell deflection is limited by the intrinsic damping factor, z, of the thermowell. At resonance, the maximum magnification factor is FM , ’

max

5

1 2z 1

Mb 5 Pb

L

∫ D(z) ( z 2 z )dz s

zs

(6-10-2)

where P b denotes either PD, P d, or P l and is equal to the force per unit area applied transverse to the beam. For a thermowell shielded from fluid flow for a distance L 0 from the thermowell root, L0 replaces z s as the lower limit of the integration in eq. (6-10-2), and the result for M b is used in eq. (6-10-1) to obtain the value of Sz. For calculation purposes, it is convenient to define G as

ing the reduction in the thermowell vibration frequency due to compliance of the foundation or support. For the case of in-line resonances, the magnification factor is FM′ 5

2yM I for steady-state stresses  Sz 5 2yMFM I for lift resonance stresses  (6-10-1) 2yMF ’ I for drag resonance stresses M 

G≡

Mb D( zs ) 2Pb I ( zs )

5

32D( zs )

L

p ( D( zs )4 2 d 4 ) z∫

D( z) ( z 2 zs ) dz  (6-10-3)

s

The dimensionless quantity G depends only on the thermowell geometry. At the thermowell support point, G is evaluated with the lower limit of integration zs 5 max (0,  L0) and shall be denoted GSP. For step-shank thermowells, peak stress amplitudes need to be evaluated at the base of the reduced-diameter shank, of diameter B, as well as at the support point. In this case, G is evaluated with the lower limit of integration zs 5 max (L − LS, L0) and shall be denoted GRD. At the thermowell support point, the steady-state drag stress on the downstream side of the thermowell is

for excitation of a transverse (lift) resonance

FM , max 5 2z for excitation of an in-line (drag) resonance (6-9-3)

6-10 BENDING STRESSES 6-10.1 Point of Maximum Stress



The peak stresses occur on the outside surface of the thermowell at the support plane for taper and straight-shank thermowells, and at either the support plane or the base of the reduced-diameter section of shank for step-shank thermowells. Except

SD 5 Gb PD 5

Gb CD  V 2 2



(6-10-4)

where the equation uses the convention that compressive stresses have a positive sign and Gb is a placeholder for either GSP for stress evaluated at the support point or GRD for stress evaluated at the reduced-diameter 21

Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

Fig. 6-10.1-1  Bending Moment, Stress at the Support Plane, and Locations of Maximum Steady-State or Oscillating In-Line Stress Fluid velocity

y

S(x � 0; y, z � 0)

M

Maximum longitudinal bending stress (a) For a Tapered Thermowell

Fluid velocity

y

S(x � 0; y, z � 0)

M

Maximum longitudinal bending stress at step-shank base Maximum longitudinal bending stress at support plane (b) For a Step-Shank Thermowell Subject to Fluid-Flow

GENERAL NOTE: Locations for maximum oscillating transverse stress are located in the same plane, but at points rotated 90 deg about the thermowell axis.

22 Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

shank (see paras. 6-10.2 to 6-10.5). The amplitudes for oscillating-lift and oscillating-drag stresses are SL 5 Gb FM Pl 5



’ b M d



Sd 5 G F P 5

Gb Cl FM  V 2 2 Gb Cd FM’  V 2 2



(6-10-5)



(6-10-6)

6-10.4 Maximum Stress for Step-Shank Thermowells, No Shielding From Flow For a step-shank thermowell, the peak stresses may occur either at the support plane of the thermowell or at the base of the reduced-diameter step shank. At the support plane, the parameter G is given as

Equation (6-4-5) gives coefficients CD, Cl, and Cd; eqs. (6-9-1) through (6-9-3) give magnification factors FM and FM′ . The stress amplitudes are used in estimating the combined bending stress in subsection 6-12. For step-shank thermowells, peak stress amplitudes shall be evaluated at the base of the reduced-diameter shank, of diameter B, as well as at the support point. In this case, evaluating G at D(zs) 5 B for use in eqs. (6-10-4) through (6-10-6) gives the stress amplitudes at the base of the reduced-diameter shank.

GSP 5



16 L2

[11 2(B A)] 

3pA 1 2 ( d / A )  2

4



{

}

L ) 

2

}

(6-10-9)

16LS 2 4 pB 2  1 2 ( d / B )   



(6-10-10)

If the thermowell is shielded from fluid flow from the thermowell support plane to a distance L0 along the shank, the parameter G at the support plane for a stepshank thermowell is given as GSP =

16 L2 4 pA 2 1 − ( d / A ) 

{(B A) + 1 − (B A)

1 − ( LS L) − ( L0 L) 2

If the thermowell is shielded from fluid flow from the thermowell support plane to a distance L0 along the shank, the point of maximum stress shall be evaluated at the support plane for a straight or tapered thermowell. The parameter G is given as 2 3 1 2 ( L0 / L )  4  3 pA 2  1 2 ( d / A )     3 12 ( B /A 2 1) 1 2 ( L0 / L )   

S

6-10.5 Maximum Stress for Step-Shank Thermowells, Shielded From Flow

(6-10-7)

6-10.3 Maximum Stress for Tapered or Straight Thermowells, Shielded From Flow

16L2

{(B A) 1 12 (B A) 12 (L

At the support plane of the thermowell, the steadystate drag stress and oscillating-lift and oscillatingdrag stresses are evaluated using eqs. (6-10-4) through (6-10-6) and the value of GSP from eq. (6-10-9). At the base of the reduced-diameter step shank, stress amplitudes are evaluated using eqs. (6-10-4) through (6-10-6) and the value of GRD from eq. (6-10-10).

The steady-state drag stress and oscillating-lift and oscillating-drag stress amplitudes are evaluated using eqs. (6-10-4) through (6-10-6) and the value of GSP from eq. (6-10-7).

GSP 5

GRD 5



With no shielding for a tapered or straight thermowell subject to a constant force per unit area, eq. (6-10-2) is integrated along the whole thermowell length. The result for the parameter G is GSP 5

4 pA 1 2 ( d / A ) 

where the reduced-diameter step has length LS and diameter B. At the reduced-diameter shank step, the parameter G is given as

6-10.2 Maximum Stress for Tapered or Straight Thermowells, No Shielding From Flow



16L2 2

GSP = 

2

}

for L0 < L − LS



2

16BL 1 − ( L0 L)2  for L0 ≥ L − LS 4     pA 1 − ( d / A )  (6-10-11) 3

At the reduced-diameter shank step, eq. (6-10-10) applies for shielding from fluid flow with L0 , L – LS. For L0 . L – LS, the parameter G is given as

(6-10-8)

16 L2

1 − ( L0 L)  2 ( LS L) − 1 + ( L0 L) 4  pB2 1 − ( d / B)   (6-10-12)

GRD =

The steady-state drag stress and oscillating-lift and oscillating-drag stress amplitudes are evaluated using eqs. (6-10-4) through (6-10-6) and the value of GSP from eq. (6-10-8). The majority of installed thermowells have some degree of shielding from fluid flow near the support point. However, the total second moment, and consequently the value of G, varies little from the shielded case when L0/L , 1. For typical thermowells, the values of GSP evaluated using eqs. (6-10-7) and (6-10-8) will differ by less than approximately 10% if L0/L , 0.3.

At the support plane of the thermowell, the steadystate drag stress and oscillating-lift and oscillating-drag stresses are evaluated using eqs. (6-10-4) through (6-10-6) and the appropriate value of GSP from eq. (6-10-11). At the base of the reduced-diameter step shank, stress amplitudes are evaluated using eqs. (6-10-4) through (6-10-6) and the appropriate value of GRD from eq. (6-10-10) or (6-10-12). 23

Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

Fig. 6-10.7-1  Mounting of a Thermowell in an Elbow, With the Tip Facing Downstream

V

L

6-10.6 Partial Exposure to Fluid Flow

6-11 PRESSURE AND SHEAR STRESSES

For thermowells with only partial exposure to the fluid flow not covered by paras. 6-10.3 or 6-10.5, the bending moment should be calculated by integrating the moment created by the pressure acting on the projected area exposed to fluid flow.

In addition to the bending stresses, there are the following stresses: (a) (b) (c) (d)

6-10.7 Mounting of Thermowells in an Elbow

radial pressure stress, Sr tangential pressure stress, St axial pressure stress, Sa shear stress due to flow impingement

Shear stresses are small relative to the other stresses and should be neglected. For an external operating pressure P, the radial and hoop stresses at the root are given by

For thermowells mounted in an elbow and pointing downstream, as shown in Fig. 6-10.7-1, the exact flow path is difficult to model. Thus, the projected area shall be conservatively estimated as the projected area of the thermowell if the flow were to be normal to the thermowell axis along the length of the thermowell exposed to fluid flow. The geometry to be used in the calculation of thermowell ratings is given in Fig. 6-10.7-2. Thermowells mounted in an elbow with the tip pointing upstream, as shown in Fig.6-10.7-3, are often preferable to a mounting with the tip pointing downstream. Provided that the flow lines in the upstream pipe are closely approximated as lines parallel to the pipe axis, there is minimal transverse fluid flow near the tip of the thermowell, with a consequent reduction of the bending moment. Tip effects are important, and the effective Strouhal number varies with the angle of flow with respect to the thermowell axis [16]. For such an installation, calculation of the bending moment is beyond the scope of this Standard. Predictions of the bending moment and Strouhal number should be made by using computational fluid dynamics or experimental measurements to determine the fluid flow pattern, including the perturbations of upstream piping elements, and consulting reference [16] to determine the forces on the thermowell.





(6-11-1)

Sr 5 P

St 5 P

1 1 ( d / A )2 1 2 ( d / A )2



(6-11-2)

where d is the bore diameter of the thermowell and compressive stresses have a positive sign. The axial pressure stress is given by

Sa 5

P 1 2 ( d / A )2



(6-11-3)

6-12 STEADY-STATE STATIC AND DYNAMIC STRESS LIMITS 6-12.1 Overview In addition to the hydrostatic pressure limit of subsection 6-13, thermowells shall meet strength criteria to prevent fatigue failure. For conditions of low fluid velocity, as described in para. 6-3.6, the fluid does not impart sufficient momentum to the thermowell to cause fatigue

24 Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

Fig. 6-10.7-2  Geometry to Be Used in Calculation of Thermowell Ratings

L

V

Fig. 6-10.7-3  Mounting of a Thermowell in an Elbow, With the Tip Facing Upstream L

V

failure and only the steady-state stress limit in para. 6-12.2 shall be met. For higher fluid velocities, the thermowell shall meet the requirements described in para. 6-12.2 for steady-state stresses and paras. 6-12.3 and 6-12.4 for dynamic stresses. Paragraph 6-12.5 describes the special case of thermowells designed for operation at fluid velocities where the Strouhal frequency exceeds the natural frequency of the mounted thermowell.



The steady-state loading from the combined effects of hydrostatic fluid pressure and nonoscillating drag produces a point of maximum stress, Smax, in the thermowell located on the outer surface of the thermowell, at the downstream side of the base of the thermowell, along the axial direction of the thermowell. For design, Smax is given by Smax 5 SD 1 Sa

2

1 ( Smax 2 St ) 1 ( St 2 Sr ) 2

2

2

# 1.5S (6-12-2)

where S 5 maximum allowable stress of the material, as specified by the governing code For combinations of materials and operating temperature not covered by the governing code, stress limits shall be established by test. Note that for service at elevated temperatures for extended periods, creep rate and creep rupture limit the allowable stress to values significantly below the stress limits obtained from short-term yield-strength tests.

6-12.2 Steady-State Stress Limits



( Smax 2 Sr )

6-12.3 Dynamic Stress Limits The dynamic stresses are the result of periodic drag forces that cause the thermowell to oscillate in the direction of the stream and periodic lift forces that cause it to oscillate in the transverse direction. The dynamic stress amplitude shall not exceed the high-cycle maximum allowable stress amplitude. The peak oscillatory bending stress amplitude, So,max, is taken as the amplitude of

(6-12-1)

Using the Von Mises criteria for failure, the applied stresses Smax, Sr, and St should satisfy 25

Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

Table 6-12.3-1  Allowable Fatigue-Stress Amplitude Limits for Material Class A and Class B Thermowell Material Class

Metal State at Location of Maximum Stress

Value of Sf , ksi/MPa

A

As-welded [Note (1)] or threaded

3.0 / 20.7

A

Welded, then machined [Note (2)]

4.7 / 32.4

A

No welds [Note (3)]

7.0 / 48.3

B

As-welded [Note (1)] or threaded

5.4 / 37.2

B

Welded, then machined [Note (2)]

9.1 / 62.8

B

No welds [Note (3)]

13.6 / 93.8

GENERAL NOTES: (a) Class A is carbon, low-alloy, series 4XX, and high-alloy steels not covered in class B. (b) Class B is series 3XX high-alloy steels, nickel–chromium–iron alloy, nickel–iron–chromium alloy, and nickel–copper alloys. NOTES: (1) Location of maximum stress coincides with either a welded joint or associated heat-affected zone [e.g., a weld-in thermowell, as shown in Fig. 4-1-4, illustration (d)]. (2) Location of maximum stress coincides with either a welded joint or associated heat-affected zone, which has been machined to a smooth surface subsequent to welding [e.g., a flanged thermowell, as shown in Fig. 4-1-4, illustration (c)]. The welded joint must be a full-penetration weld, and visual and magnetic-particle or liquid-dye-penetrant examination is required after machining. In the absence of full-penetration welds and/or weld inspection, “as welded” values for Sf should be used. (3) Location of maximum stress is a smooth, machined surface and does not coincide with either welded joint or associated heat-affected zone (e.g., a lap-joint thermowell).

the two components added in quadrature, amplified by a stress concentration factor, Kt:

So, max 5 Kt (Sd 2 1 SL 2 ) 1/ 2

and V provide guidance on corrosion control and piping corrosion. FT is a temperature correction factor given by

(6-12-3)



The thermowell design should be evaluated for fatigue in accordance with ASME BPVC, Section VIII, Division 2, Part 5, independent of the requirements of para. 6-12.3. Alternatively, the thermowell design should be evaluated for fatigue in accordance with the requirements of para. 6-12.3. In the absence of more directly applicable data, the following should be used:

Kt 5 1.1 1 0.033 ( A / b ) for A / b < 33 Kt 5 2.2 for A / b $ 33

(6-12-4)

The peak oscillatory bending stress amplitude So,max shall not exceed the fatigue-endurance limit, adjusted for temperature and environmental effects:

So, max , FT ⋅ FE ⋅ S f

(6-12-6)

where E(T) is the elastic modulus at the operation temperature. For material class A (see Table 6-12.3-1), Eref equals 202 GPa (29.3 3 106 psi), except for the low-Cr alloys, for which Eref equals 213 GPa (30.9 3 106 psi). For material class B (see Table 6-12.3-1), Eref equals 195 GPa (28.3 3 106 psi), except for the nickel–copper alloys, for which Eref equals 179 GPa (26.0 3 106 psi). Because the natural frequency of thermowells is typically hundreds of hertz, the total number of fatigue cycles can readily exceed 1011 during the thermowell lifetime and Sf should be evaluated at the design-cycle limit. In the absence of more directly applicable data, the values of Sf in the high-cycle limit in Table 6-12.3-1 should be used for a design life of 1011 cycles for typical hydrocarbon and steam environments. Use of the values in Table 6-12.3-1 for other environments or at temperatures in excess of 427°C (800°F) may require a reduction in the environmental factor FE to account for corrosion or related effects. When thermowells are welded into a pipe or adaptor of different composition than the thermowell, the value of Sf shall be the smaller of the values for the two metals. The designer shall consider the effects on fatigue strength of the dissimilar weld and thermal-expansion mismatch between the materials. For materials not covered by Table 6-12.3-1 or ASME BPVC Section VIII, Division 2, fatigue-strength amplitude limits shall be established by test. Testing shall be in accordance with the provisions of ASME BPVC Section VIII, Division 2, Annex 5.F. A fatigue analysis in

(a) A stress concentration factor of Kt 5 2.2 should be used in the absence of specific dimensional details of the fillet at the base of the thermowell. (b) Threaded connections shall use a stress concentration factor of Kt 5 2.3 as a minimum. (c) For known fillet radii b and root diameter A, Kt shall be obtained from

FT 5 E(T)/Eref

(6-12-5)

where Sf is the allowable fatigue-stress amplitude limit in air at room temperature. FE is an environmental factor (FE # 1) allowing designers to adjust fatigue limits, when appropriate, for environmental effects such as corrosive service. ASME B31.1, Power Piping, Appendices IV 26

Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

As a simplified alternative, and for materials not covered by UG-28, the allowable external pressure should be calculated as

accordance with ASME BPVC Section VIII, Division 2, Part 5 (latest edition) is required for conditions outside the scope of Table 6-12.3-1. The values in Table 6-12.3-1 are evaluated for 1011 fatigue cycles. For thermowells subject to a lower number of cycles over the design lifetime, the designer should use fatigue data for the appropriate number of cycles.



  2.167 Pc 5 0.66S  2 0.0833    2B / ( B 2 d )

(6-13-1)

where S = the maximum allowable stress of the governing code

6-12.4 Maximum-Stress Locations for Step-Shank Thermowells

The value of Pc calculated by eq. (6-13-1) may be as much as 17% lower than the value calculated by UG-28 for some materials at some temperatures. At temperatures beyond the limits established by UG-28, designers should use eq. (6-13-1). In determining the appropriate value of S, designers should consider the possibility of creep buckling, especially for the larger values of d/B allowed by Tables 4-1-1 and 4-2-1. For high-pressure [.  103 MPa (15  ksi)] service, use ASME BPVC Section VIII, Division 3, or ASME B31.3, Chapter IX.

For step-shank thermowells, the stress criteria [eqs. (6-12-2) and (6-12-5)] shall be evaluated for the following two locations: (a) at the support plane of the thermowell (b) at the root of the reduced-diameter portion of the shank First, evaluate the stress at the thermowell support plane, using the procedures described in subsection 6-10. Second, evaluate the stress at the root of the reduced-diameter portion of the shank, substituting (B/bs) for (A/b) in eq. (6-12-4), where bs is the fillet radius at this root.

Step 2. The minimum tip thickness, t, (see Fig. 4-1-1) shall always be equal to or greater than the minimum wall thickness of the shank. (Refer to Tables 4-1-1 and 4-2-1 for minimum allowed wall thickness.) Calculate the allowable pressure, Pt, for the thickness t using

6-12.5 Supercritical Operation It is recognized that where the fluid density is low, namely low-pressure gases with densities less than 1 kg/ m3 (0.06 lb/ft3), it is possible to design a thermowell for supercritical operation, defined as an operation where the Strouhal frequency exceeds the natural frequency of the mounted thermowell: fS .  f nc . Finite-element and modal analysis methods are generally required, but in principle, if the stresses of the lowest-order mode at the lift resonance condition are well below both the maximum allowable stress (static loads) and the fatigue allowable stress (dynamic loads), then the second order mode should be considered as a basis for thermowell design and selection. The success of such operation is dependent on many factors and shall be handled on a case-by-case basis. Supercritical operation is discouraged in performance testing of rotating equipment.

2



Pt 5

S t   0.13  d 

(6-13-2)

where d 5 thermowell bore diameter S 5 maximum allowable stress Step 3. The external pressure rating, Pr, of the thermowell is the minimum of Pc  , Pt , and Pf for flange thermowells, or the minimum of Pc and Pt for other types of thermowells. The external pressure rating shall exceed the maximum operating pressure, P. For a flanged or a lap-joint (Van Stone) thermowell, determine the allowable pressure of the flange, Pf, in accordance with ASME B16.5, Pipe Flanges and Flange Fittings, or the governing code. De-rate the flange to the minimum of Pt and Pc if Pf . Pt or Pc. The maximum allowable operating pressure of the flange, Pf  , shall be in accordance with ASME B16.5 or the governing code unless Pt , Pf or Pc , Pf  , in which case Pf shall be reduced to the minimum of Pt and Pc. The design pressure shall be calculated at the temperature of the operating condition. More than one operating condition may require calculations at multiple temperatures.

6-13 PRESSURE LIMIT The external pressure rating of the thermowell shall be determined as follows: Step 1. For pressure ratings less than 103 MPa (15 ksi), use UG-28 of Section VIII, Division 1 of the ASME BPVC to calculate the allowable external pressure, Pc, (as defined in UG-28) for a cylinder of outer diameter B, inner diameter d, and length L for straight and tapered thermowells, or length Ls for step-shank thermowells.

27 Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

Section 7 Overview of Calculations 7-1 QUANTITATIVE CRITERIA

7-4.1 Necessary Dimensions

There are four quantitative criteria that the thermowell shall meet to be fit for service.

Necessary dimensions include A 5 outside diameter of thermowell at support plane or root, m (in.) B 5 outside diameter at tip of thermowell, m (in.) b 5 fillet radius at root base of thermowell, m (in.) bS 5 fillet radius at the base of the reduced-diameter length of a step-shank thermowell, m (in.) d 5 bore diameter of thermowell, m (in.) L 5 unsupported length of thermowell, m (in.) LS 5 length of reduced-diameter shank for a step-shank thermowell, m (in.) t 5 minimum tip thickness of the thermowell, m (in.) Values of A, b, and L may depend on details of the installation (see subsection 6-7), such as the weld geometry or the use of weld adaptors.

(a) Frequency Limit. The resonance frequency of the thermowell shall be sufficiently high so that destructive oscillations are not excited by the fluid flow. (b) Dynamic Stress Limit. The maximum primary dynamic stress shall not exceed the allowable fatigue stress limit. (c) Static Stress Limit. The maximum steady-state stress on the thermowell shall not exceed the allowable stress, as determined by the Von Mises criteria. (d) Hydrostatic Pressure Limit. The external pressure shall not exceed the pressure ratings of the thermowell tip, shank, and flange. In addition, the suitability of the thermowell material for the process environment (section 5) shall be considered.

7-4.2 Material Properties

7-2 FLUID PROPERTIES

Necessary material properties of the thermowell include E 5 modulus of elasticity at service temperature, Pa (psi) S 5 maximum allowable working stress, Pa (psi) Sf 5 fatigue endurance limit, in the high-cycle limit, Pa (psi) m 5 mass density of the thermowell material, kg/m3 (lb/in.3) Material properties do not need to be known to better than 1% of the property value for mass density, 5% for elastic modulus, and 10% for stress and endurance limits. Any interpolation of values in tables or figures should follow the methods recommended by the source of the tables. Necessary properties of the temperature sensor installed in the thermowell include s 5 density of the temperature sensor, kg/m3 (lb/in.3) The temperature-sensor density enters into the calculations only as a small correction, and the default values of para. 6-5.3 may be used.

Collect the following fluid properties: P 5 operating pressure, Pa (psi) T 5 operating temperature, 8C (8F) V 5 process-fluid velocity, m/s (in./sec) v 5 specific volume (reciprocal of the fluid density ), m3/kg (in.3/lb) m 5 dynamic fluid viscosity, Pa⋅s (lbf⋅sec/ft2), or v 5 kinematic fluid viscosity, m2/s (ft2/sec)  5 fluid density, kg/m3 (lb/in.3) As noted in para. 6-4.1, viscosity is not needed if eq. (6-4-4) is used to specify the Strouhal number. In determining the process-fluid velocity, the designer should consider variations in the fluid velocity due to start-up or shutdown conditions (para. 6-3.3), valve operations, or other deviations from steady-state operation.

7-3 FLUID VELOCITY Determine whether the fluid velocity is sufficiently low that no calculations other than the external pressure limit need to be performed (para. 6-3.6).

7-4.3 Temperature Dependence of Properties Evaluate the thermowell material density and all of the thermowell dimensions at ambient temperature. Fluid properties, the elastic modulus of the thermowell material, and the stress- and fatigue-amplitude limits shall all be evaluated at the operating temperature.

7-4 MATERIAL PROPERTIES AND DIMENSIONS Collect thermowell dimensions.

material

properties

and

28 Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

7-7 NATURAL FREQUENCY AT EXPECTED MODE OF OPERATION

7-4.4 Installation Details Necessary details of the installation include KM 5 rotational stiffness of thermowell support, (N⋅m)/rad [(in.-lb)/rad] See subsection 6-6 for additional information on the factor KM. Subsection 6-7 discusses determination of values of L, A, and b for various installation types.

Determine if the natural frequency of the mounted thermowell is sufficiently high for the expected mode of operation (subsection 6-8). For the general case, this determination will require calculation of the maximum stresses, as described in subsection 7-8.

7-5 REYNOLDS AND STROUHAL NUMBERS

7-8 STEADY-STATE AND DYNAMIC STRESSES

Calculate the Reynolds number and Strouhal number characterizing the fluid flow (para. 6-4.1). Obtain the coefficients of lift and drag characterizing fluid forces on the thermowell (para. 6-4.2).

Calculate the maximum steady-state and dynamic stresses at the support plane of the thermowell (subsections 6-10 and 6-11). For step-shank thermowells, repeat this calculation at the root of the reduced-diameter portion of the shank.

7-6 NATURAL FREQUENCY AT OPERATION TEMPERATURE

7-9 ALLOWABLE FATIGUE LIMITS

Calculate the natural frequency of the mounted thermowell at operation temperature (subsection 6-5). This calculation consists of the following steps:

Determine if the stresses exceed allowable fatigue limits (subsection 6-12).

Step 1. Calculate the approximate natural frequency.

7-10 PRESSURE RATING

Step 2. Use the correlations of subsection 6-5 to correct for deviations from the approximate slender-beam theory.

Calculate the pressure rating of the thermowell, based on the pressure rating of the tip, thermowell shank, and any flange (subsection 6-13). Determine if the pressure rating exceeds the design pressure.

Step 3. Correct for sensor and fluid mass. Step 4. Correct for foundation compliance.

29 Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

Section 8 Examples (a) from ASME B31.1, Table C-1 (interpolated in temperature), modulus of elasticity at service temperature: E 5 27.5 3 106 psi (b) from ASME B31.1, Table A-1, maximum allowable working stress: S 5 19,800 psi (c) thermowell construction is welded, then machined, so from Table 6-12.3-1 (Class A, welded), fatigue endurance limit, in the high-cycle limit: Sf 5 3,000 psi (d) from reference [19], mass density of carbon steel: m 5 0.284 lb/in.3

NOTE: In the following examples, intermediate results are given for the multistep calculations. Although intermediate results are rounded to four significant digits in the text for clarity, numerical calculations were performed for the full chain of calculations without rounding.

8-1 TAPERED, WELDED THERMOWELL FOR A STEAM-HEADER APPLICATION (U.S. CUSTOMARY UNITS) 8-1.1 Application, Properties, Dimensions, and Installation

8-1.1.4  Installation Details.  For the rotational stiffness of the thermowell support, KM, we will assume the thermowell is mounted to a thick-wall pipe (subsection 6-6) and will use eq. (6-6-5). For the average density of the temperature sensor, we will use the default value found in para. 6-5.3, Step 5, s 5 169 lb/ft3.

Consider a thermowell for a steam bypass line, for use under ASME B31.1, Power Piping.

8-1.1.1  Steam Properties (a) superheated steam pressure: P 5 235 psig (b) operating temperature: T 5 4508F (c) normal flow condition: V 5 295 ft/sec (d) steam density:  5 0.499 lb/ft3 (e) viscosity:  5 0.0171 cP, or using the conversion factor 1 cP 5 6.7197 3 1024 lb/(ftsec),  5 1.149 3 1025 lb/ (ftsec)

8-1.1.5  Reynolds and Strouhal Numbers.  The Reynolds number is calculated [eq. (6-4-3)] as Re 5



5

( 295 ft/sec )(1.0 in.) (0.499 lb/ft 3 ) 5 1.068 × 106 1.149 3 1025 lb/ ( ft ⋅ sec )  (12 in/ft )

For this example, Re . 5 3 105, and either eq. (6-4-2) or (6-4-4) gives the Strouhal number NS 5 0.22. The force coefficients using eq. (6-4-5) are CD 5 1.4 Cd 5 0.1 Cl 5 1.0

8-1.1.2  Thermowell Dimensions.  The thermowell has a tapered shank, with a machined fillet at the root of the shank, which is also the support plane. For this highvelocity application, the thermowell is welded directly into the process piping, with the support plane in the heat-affected zone of the weld. The nominal insertion of the thermowell into the process stream is 4 in. The unsupported length, L, exceeds this nominal length due to the possible incomplete penetration of the weld [see Fig. 6-6-1, illustration (e)]. (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f)

VB

8-1.2 Natural Frequency Calculation Step 1. Approximate natural frequency [eq. (6-5-1)]:  p(D a 4 2 d 4 )/64 I5 5 p[(1.25 in.)4 2 (0.26 in.)4 ]/64 5 0.1196 in.4 m 5 mp(D a 2 2 d 2 )/4 5 (0.284 lb/in.3) p[(1.25 in.)2 2 (0.26 in.)2 ]/4 5 0.3334 lb/in.

root diameter: A 5 1.5 in. tip diameter: B 5 1.0 in. fillet radius at base: b 5 0.0 in. bore: d 5 0.26 in. unsupported length: L 5 4.06 in. minimum wall thickness: t 5 0.188 in

where Da 5 (1.5 in. + 1.0 in.)/2 5 1.25 in. Calculate the approximate natural frequency of the thermowell as

8-1.1.3  Materials Properties.  The material of construction is ASTM A 105 carbon steel [18], with the following properties:

30 Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

fa 5

1.8752  EI    2p  m 

1/ 2

Step 6. Correct for foundation compliance [eq. (6-6-5)]:

1 2

L

1.8752  (27.5 3 106 psi)[386.088 in.-lb/(lbf⋅ sec 2 )](0.1196 in.4 )  5   0.3334 lb/in. 2p   1

H c 5 1 2 (0.61)

1/ 2

5 1 2 (0.61)

( 4.06 in.)2 5 2, 095 Hz

( A / L) [1  1.5(b / A)]2 (0.3695) [1  1.5(0)]2

5 0.7746

where A/L 5 (1.5 in.)/(4.06 in.) 5 0.3695 b/A 5 (0.0 in.)/(1.5 in.) 5 0.0 The in situ natural frequency of the mounted thermowell [eq. (6-6-1)] is given as

where E 5 the elastic modulus at the operating temperature I5p  (Da4 2 d4)/64, which is the second moment of inertia L 5 unsupported length of the thermowell m 5 mp(D a 2 2 d 2 )/4, which is the mass per unit length of the thermowell The conversion factor 386.088 in.-lb 5 1 lbfsec2 is necessary when E is given in units of pounds per square inch (equivalent to lbf/in.2). (See para. 6-5.3, Step 2, and Nonmandatory Appendix A.)

f nc 5 H c f n 5 (0.7746)(2, 809 Hz) 5 2, 176 Hz

8-1.3 Scruton Number Calculation Because the Reynolds number exceeds 105, the general frequency limits of para. 6-8.3 apply and no calculation of Scruton number is needed. The calculation is included here as an example. We take a conservative value of 0.0005 for the damping factor, , used in eq. (6-8-1):

Step 2. Use the correlations of subsection 6-5 to correct for deviations from the approximate slender-beam theory: Hf 5

5

2 0.99 1  ( 1 − B/A )  ( 1 − B/A )    3[120.8 ( d / Da )] 1  1.1 ( Da / L )

NSc 5 p2  ( m  ) 1 2 (d / B)2   0.284 lb/in.3 5 p2 (0.0005)  3 24 3 3  0.499 lb/ft 5.787 310 ft /in. 5 4.525

2 0.99 1  ( 1 − 0.6667 )  ( 1 2 0.6667 )  3[120.8 ( 0.2080 )]] 1  1.1 ( 0.3079 )

(

5 1.352

Step 1. From eq. (6-4-1), the vortex shedding rate with a Strouhal number of NS 5 0.22 and at the normal flow condition is

2m

( 0.499 lb/ft ) 2 ( 0.284 lb/in. ) (1, 728 in. /ft ) 3

3

3

5 0.9995

fS 5

Step 4. Correct for the sensor mass:

5 12

 1 s    2 2m  ( Da / d ) 2 1  169 lb/ft 3

(

)

8-1.4 Frequency Limit Calculation

 3

H a ,s 5 1 2

(

Although NSc is greater than 2.5, the Reynolds number exceeds 105, and the in-line resonance cannot be assumed to be suppressed.

Step 3. Correct for the fluid mass:

51−

  1 2 0.2600 2

) 

where d/B 5 (0.26 in.)/(1.0 in.) 5 0.26

where B/A 5 (1.0 in.)/(1.5 in.) 5 0.6667 Da/L 5 (1.25 in.)/(4.06 in.) 5 0.3079 d/Da 5 (0.26 in.)/(1.25 in.) 5 0.2080

H a ,f 5 1 −

)(

(

)(

5

NSV B (0.22)(295 ft/sec)(12 in./ft)

5 778.8 Hz

)

2 0.284 lb/in.3 1, 728 in. 3/ft 3

)

(1.0 in.)

Step 2. Check that the natural frequency of the mounted thermowell is sufficiently high. In the present example, the thermowell passes the most stringent frequency limit [eq. 6-8-7)]:

1    4.808 2 2 1 

5 0.9922

fS  0.4 f nc

where Da/d 5 (1.25 in.)/(0.26 in.) 5 4.808

778.8 Hz  870.2 Hz 5 0.4(2,176 Hz)

Step 5. The lowest-order natural frequency of the thermowell with ideal support [eq. (6-5-6)] is given by

In this case, no calculation of cyclic stress at in-line resonance is needed, because the forced or Strouhal frequency is less than the in-line resonance frequency. However, for the sake of completeness, calculation of this quantity is included in para. 8-1.5.

fn 5 Hf Ha,f Ha,s fa 5 (1.352)(0.9995)(0.9922)(2,095 Hz) 5 2,809 Hz 31

Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

Step 6. Compare the predicted stress with the fatigue stress limit, given by the right-hand side of eq. (6-12-5):

8-1.5 Cyclic Stress at the In-Line Resonance Step 1. Use eqs. (6-8-3) and (6-8-4) to establish the flow velocity corresponding to the in-line resonance: VIR 5 5

FT FES f 5 (0.9386)(1.0)(3, 000 psi) 5 2, 816 psi

Bf nc

The fatigue stress limit, 2,816 psi, is less than the combined stress, 58,430 psi. The thermowell would not pass the cyclic stress condition for steady-state operation at the in-line resonance, corresponding to a fluid velocity of 412 ft/sec, if the vortex shedding frequency, fs, had been greater than 0.4 f nc (see para. 8-1.4, Step 2).

2NS (1.0 in.)(12 in./ft )21 ( 2, 176 Hz )

5 412.0 ft/sec

2(0.22)

Step 2. Evaluate cyclic drag stress at the root. The magnification factor, F’M , for the drag or in-line resonance is set at 1,000 [see paras. 6-8.3, Step 1; and 6-9.2]. Begin by evaluating the value of GSP using eq. (6-10-7): GSP 5 5

16L2 4 3pA 2 1 2 ( d / A )  16( 4.06 in.)2 2

8-1.6 Steady-State Stress at the Design Velocity Step 1. Evaluate the radial, tangential, and axial stresses due to the external pressure, at the location of maximum stress [eqs.(6-11-1) through (6-11-3)]:

[1 2(B A)]

(

3p(1.5 in.) 1 2 0.1733

)

2

Sr 5 P 5 235 psi

[1  2(0.6667 )]

St 5 P

1 2 ( d / A) 5 249.66 psi

5 29.05

where

Sa 5

d/A 5 (0.26 in.)/(1.5 in.) 5 0.1733

5

1 ( 0.499 lb/ft 2

3

)( 5.787 310

24

ft 3 /in.3 ) (0.1)

2

5 0.9143 psi

where the conversion factor 386.088 in.-lb 5 1 lbfsec2 is included to give a final answer in units of pounds per square inch (psi). The cyclic stresses due to cyclic drag [eq. (6-10-6)] at the in-line resonance condition are

1 1 2 (0.1733)2

5 6.561 psi

where the conversion factor 386.088 in.-lb 5 1 lbfsec2 is included to give a final answer in units of pounds per square inch (psi). Step 3. Evaluate the steady-state stress due to the drag force [eq. (6-10-4)]: SD 5 GSP PD 5 29.05(6.561 psi) 5 190.6 psi

Kt 5 2.2

Step 4. Evaluate combined drag and lift stresses, with lift stress set to zero [eq. (6-12-3)]:

Step 4. Before using the Von Mises criterion to assess the stress limit at the root, compute the maximum stress given by eq. (6-12-1):

5 Kt Sd

5 58, 430 psi

Smax 5 SD  Sa 5 432.9 psi

Step 5. Evaluate the temperature de-rating factor from eq. (6-12-6):

Step 5. Compute the left-hand side (LHS) of the Von Mises criteria [eq. (6-12-2)]:

FT 5 E(T ) / Eref 5

1 2 (0.1733)2

2

Step 3. Evaluate the stress concentration factor from eq. (6-12-4):

1/ 2

5 (235 psi)

1  (0.1733)2

[(295 ft/sec)(12 in./ft)]

Sd 5 GSP FM’ Pd 5 29.05(1, 000)(0.9143 psi) 5 26, 560 psi

)

5 (235 psi)

1 PD 5  CDV 2 2 3 24 3 3 1 ( 0.499 lb/ft )( 5.787 3 10 ft /in. ) (1.4) 5 2 [386.088 in.-lb/(lbf  sec )] 2

[(412.0 ft/sec)(12 in./ft)]

(

2

2

Step 2. Evaluate steady-state drag stress at the root. First, evaluate the steady-state drag force per unit area:

[386.088 in.-lb/(lbf  sec 2 )]

So ,max 5 Kt Sd 2 + SL 2

P

1 2 ( d / A) 5 242.3 psi

From eq. (6-3-3), the force per unit area due to cyclic drag is 1 Pd 5  CdVIR 2 2

1  ( d / A )2

27.5 3 10 6 psi

29.3 3 106 psi 5 0.9386

LHS 5

(Smax 2 Sr )2  (Smax 2 St )2 + (St − Sr )2 2

5 191.0 psi

The environmental de-rating factor, FE, is taken as unity for steam service. 32

Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

Step 6. Compute the stress limit given by the right-hand side (RHS) of the Von Mises criteria [eq. (6-12-2)]:

Step 4. The temperature de-rating factor is identical to the value calculated in para. 8-1.5, Step 5, FT 5 0.9386. The environmental de-rating factor, FE, is taken as unity for steam service.

RHS 5 1.5S 5 1.5(19, 800 psi) 5 29,700 psi

Step 5. Compare the predicted stress with the fatigue stress limit, given by the right-hand side of eq. (6-12-5):

The Von Mises stress, 191 psi, does not exceed the stress limit, 29,700 psi, and the thermowell passes the steady-state stress criterion.

FT FES f 5 (0.9386)(1.0)(3, 000 psi) 5 2, 816 psi

The predicted stress of 348.9 psi is below the fatigue stress limit, and the thermowell passes the dynamic stress criterion.

8-1.7 Dynamic Stress at the Design Velocity Step 1. The magnification factors for the lift (transverse) and drag (in-line) resonances are given by eqs. (6-9-1) and (6-9-2), respectively: fs

8-1.8 Pressure Stress

778.8 Hz

Step 1. Compute the external pressure rating for the shank using eq. (6-13-1):

5 0.3580 2,176 Hz 1 1 5 5 1.147 FM 5 1 2 r 2 1 2 0.3580 2 r5

r′ 5 FM′ 5

f nc

2 fs f

c n

5

5

2( 778.8 Hz )

1

2,176 Hz

1 − ( 0.7159)

 2.167  Pc 5 0.66S  2 0.0833  B B 2 d 2 / ( )   2.167   5 0.66(19, 800 psi)  2 0.0833  1 0 . 2 in.)/(1.0 in. 2 0.26 in.) (   5 9, 389 psi

5 0.7159

5 2.052

2

Step 2. Compute the external pressure rating for the tip using eq. (6-13-2):

Step 2. Evaluate the dynamic drag and lift stresses at the root. Using eq. (6-3-3), calculate the force per unit area due to cyclic drag and lift: 1 Pd 5  CdV 2 2 3 24 3 3 1 0.499 lb/ft 5.787 310 ft /in. (0.1)

5

(

)(

[386.088 in.-lb/(lbf  sec 2 )] 2 5 0.4686 psi

)

1 Pl 5  ClV 2 2 3 24 3 3 1 ( 0.499 lb/ft )( 5.787 310 ft /in. ) (1.0)

5

[386.088 in.-lb/(lbf  sec 2 )] 2 5 4.686 psi

Pt 5 5

[(295 ft/sec)(12 in./ft)]2

2

19, 800 psi  0.188 in.   0.26 in.  0.13

2

5 79, 630 psi

The pressure rating for the thermowell is the lesser of Pt and Pc, which is 9,389 psi in the present case. This rating exceeds the 235-psi operating pressure, and the thermowell passes the external pressure criterion.

[(295 ft/sec)(12 in./ft)]

2

8-2 STEP-SHANK, THREADED THERMOWELL FOR A HOT WATER APPLICATION (SI UNITS)

The cyclic stresses due to drag and lift [eqs. (6-10-5) and (6-10-6)] are

8-2.1  Application, Properties, Dimensions, and Installation

Sd 5 GSP FM’ Pd 5 (29.05)(2.052)(0.4686 psi) 5 27.93 psi Sl 5 GSP FM Pl 5 (29.05)(1.147 )( 4.686 psi) 5 156.1 psi

Consider a thermowell for a heated-water application, for use under ASME B31.1, Power Piping.

8-2.1.1  Fluid Properties (a) operating pressure: P 5 0.400 MPa (gauge pressure) (b) operating temperature: T 5 858C (c) normal flow condition: V 5 10 m/s (d) density:  5 968.8 kg/m3 (e) viscosity:  5 3.334 3 1024 Pas 5 3.334 3 1024 kg/ (ms).

The concentration factor is identical to the value calculated in 8-1.5, Step 3, Kt 5 2.2. Step 3. Evaluate combined drag and lift stresses [eq. (6-12-3)]: So ,max 5 Kt ( Sd 2  SL 2 )

1/ 2

2 2 5 2.2  ( 27.93 psi )  ( 156.1 psi )    5 348.9 psi

S  t 0.13  d 

Density and viscosity values were obtained from reference [9], based on the operating pressure and temperature.

1/ 2

33 Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

The Reynolds number is calculated [eq. (6-4-3)] as Re 5

VB 

5

(10 m/s )( 0.0127 m ) ( 968.8 kg/m 3 )

( 3.334 3 10

24

Pa ⋅ s

)

8-2.2 Natural Frequency Calculation Step 1. Approxiate natural frequency [eq. (6-5-1)]:

5 3.690 × 10 5

I 5 p (D a 4 2 d 4 )/64 5 p[(0.0222 m)4 2 (0.0066 m)4 ]/64 5 1.18331028 m4 m5  mp(D a 2  2 d 2 )/4  5 (8 000 kg/m3) p[(0.0222 m)2  2 (0.0066 m)2 ]/4

For this example, the Strouhal number is calculated using eq. (6-4-2) as NS 5 0.213 2 0.0248  Log10 ( Re / 1 300 )   0.0095  Log10 ( Re / 1 300 )  2

3

5 2.823 kg/m

5 0.213 2 0.0248  Log10 ( 3.690 3 10 5 / 1 300 )   0.0095 2

 Log10 ( 3.690 3 10 5 / 1 300 )    5 0.2040

where

3

Da 5 A 5 0.0222 m

Calculate the approximate natural frequency of the thermowell as

and the force coefficients using eq. (6-4-5) are CD 5 1.4 Cd 5 0.1 CL 5 1.0

fa 5

1/ 2

1 L2

1.8752  (1.91 3 1011 Pa)(1.183 3 1028 m 4 )    2p  2.823 kg/m  5 438.5 Hz 5

8-2.1.2  Thermowell Dimensions.  The thermowell has a step shank with a threaded base, as shown in Fig. 4-1-3, illustration (a). (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h)

1.8752  EI  2p  m 

1/ 2

1 (0.19 m)2

where E 5 the elastic modulus at the operating temperature I 5 p(D a 4 2 d 4 )/64, which is the second moment of inertia L 5 unsupported length of the thermowell m 5 mp (D a 2 2 d 2 )/4, which is the mass per unit length of the thermowell

root diameter: A 5 0.0222 m tip diameter: B 5 0.0127 m fillet radius at support plane: b 5 0 m fillet radius at base of step: bs 5 0.0032 m bore: d 5 0.0066 m unsupported length: L 5 0.19 m length of reduced-diameter shank: Ls 5 0.0635 m minimum wall thickness: t 5 0.0048 m

Step 2. Use the correlations of subsection 6-5 to correct for deviations from the approximate slender-beam theory:

8-2.1.3 Materials Properties.  The material of construction is ASTM A 182 F316 stainless steel [20], with properties as follows:

y1 5 [ c1 ( A / B)  c2 ] (Ls / L)  [ c3 ( A / B)  c4 ]

5 [1.407(1.748) 2 0.839 ] 0.3342  [20.022(1.748)  1.022 ] 5 1.525 y 2 5 [ c5 ( A / B)  c6 ] (Ls / L)  [ c7 ( A / B)  c8 ]

(a) from ASME B31.1, Table C-1 (interpolated in temperature), modulus of elasticity at service temperature : E 5 1.91 3 105 MPa 5 1.91 3 1011 Pa (b) from ASME B31.1, Table C-1 (interpolated in temperature), modulus of elasticity at ambient temperature: E 5 1.95 3 105 MPa (c) from ASME B31.1, Table A-3 (interpolated in temperature), maximum allowable working stress: S 5 122 MPa (d) thermowell construction is threaded base, so from Table 6-12.3-1 (Class B, threaded),���������������������� fatigue stress amplitude limit: Sf 5 37.2 MPa (e) from reference [19], mass density of F316 steel at ambient temperature: m 5 8 000 kg/m3

5 [22.228(1.748)  1.594 ] 0.3342  [1.313(1.748)  0.362 ] 5 1.888  5 [ c9 ( A / B)  c10 ] 5 [ 8.299(1.748) 2 5.376 ] 5 9.131

H f 5 ( y12  y 22 )

21/

5 ( 1.52529.131  1.88829.131 )

21/ 9.131

5 1.503

where A/B 5 (0.0222 m)/(0.0127 m) 5 1.748 Ls/L 5 (0.0635 m)/(0.190 m) 5 0.3342

8-2.1.4  Installation Details.  For the rotational stiffness of the thermowell support, KM, we will assume the thermowell is mounted to a rigid flange (see subsection 6-6) and will use eq. (6-7-1) to evaluate the correction factor on the natural frequency. For the average density of the temperature sensor, we will use the default value from para. 6-5.3, Step 5, s 5 2 700 kg/m3.

Step 3. Correct for the fluid mass: H a ,f 5 1 2

 2m

( 968.8 kg/m ) 2 ( 8 000 kg/m ) 3

5 12

5 0.9395

34 Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

3

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

Step 4. Correct for the sensor mass:

the thermowell passes the most stringent frequency limit [eq. (6-8-7)]:

 1 s    2  2m  ( Da / d ) 2 1  ( 2 700 kg/m3 )  1  5 12   2 ( 8 000 kg/m 3 )  3.364 2 2 1  5 0.9836

H a ,s 5 1 2

fS < 0.4 f nc 160.6 Hz  218.0 Hz 5 0.4(545.0 Hz)

where Da/d 5 (0.0222 m)/(0.0066 m) 5 3.364

In this case, no calculation of cyclic stress at in-line resonance is needed, because the forced or Strouhal frequency is less than the in-line resonance frequency. However, for the sake of completeness, calculation of this quantity is included in para. 8-2.5.

Step 5. The lowest-order natural frequency of the thermowell with ideal support [eq. (6-5-6)] is given by

8-2.5 Cyclic Stress at the In-Line Resonance The cyclic stress shall be evaluated at both the support plane and at the base of the reduced-diameter shank. The thermowell shall pass the cyclic stress criteria at both locations.

fn 5 Hf Ha,f Ha,s fa 5 (1.503)(0.9395)(0.9836)(438.5 Hz) 5 609.1 Hz Step 6. Correct for foundation compliance [eq. (6-7-1)]:

8-2.5.1 Evaluation at the Support Plane

H c 5 1 2 0.9 ( A / L) 5 1 2 0.9(0.1168) 5 0.8948

Step 1. Use eqs. (6-8-3) and (6-8-4) to establish the flow velocity corresponding to the in-line resonance: R 5 Log 10 (Re / 1 300) 5 Log 10 (3.690 3 10 5 / 1 300) 5 2.453 a(R) 5 0.0285 R 2 2 0.0496 R 5 0.04983

where A/L 5 (0.0222 m)/(0.190 m) 5 0.1168

The in situ natural frequency of the mounted thermowell [eq. (6-6-1)] is given as

 Bfnc   Bfnc  a( R) Log 10  1 −   2 NS  NS  2 NSV   (0.0127 m) ( 545.0 Hz )  0.04983  (0.0127 m) ( 545.0 Hz )   5 Log 10  1 2  2(0.2040) 0.2040  2(0.2040)(10 m/s)   

f nc = H c f n = (0.8948)(609.1 Hz) = 545.0 Hz

VIR 5

8-2.3 Scruton Number Calculation

5 16.01 m/s

We take a conservative value of 0.0005 for the damping factor, , used in eq. (6-8-1): NSc 5 p2  ( m  ) 1 2 (d / B)2   8 000 kg/m 3  5 p2 (0.0005)  1 2 0.5197 2 3  968.8 kg/m 

(

Step 2. Evaluate cyclic drag stress at the support plane, which is the thermowell root in this case. The magnification factor, F’M , for the drag or in-line resonance is set at 1 000 (see paras. 6-8.3, Step 1; and 6-9.2). Begin by evaluating the value of GSP using eq. (6-10-9):

)

5 0.02974

GSP 5

where d/B 5 (0.0066 m)/(0.0127 m) 5 0.5197 Because NSc is less than 2.5, the in-line resonance is not suppressed.

5

S

L) 

2

}

 0.5721  (1 2 0.5721)(1 2 0.3342)2   p(0.0222 m)2 1 2 0.2973 4 

(

)

where B/A 5 (0.0127 m)/(0.0222 m) 5 0.5721 d/A 5 (0.0066 m)/(0.0222 m) 5 0.2973 LS/L 5 (0.0635 m)/(0.190 m) 5 0.3342

Step 1. From eq. (6-4-1), the vortex shedding rate with a Strouhal number of NS 5 0.2040 and at the normal flow condition is

5

4 pA 1 2 ( d / A )  16(0.190 m)2 2

5 286.4

8-2.4 Frequency Limit Calculation

fS 5

{(B A)  12 (B A) 12 (L

16L2

From eq. (6-3-3), the force per unit area due to cyclic drag is

NSV B (0.2040)(10 m/s)

1 Pd 5  CdVIR 2 2 1 5 (968.8 kg/m 3 )(0.1)(16.01 m/s)2 2 5 12 420 Pa

(0.0127 m) 5 160.6 Hz

Step 2. Check that the natural frequency of the mounted thermowell is sufficiently high. In the present example, 35

Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

Using eq. (6-10-6), the cyclic stresses due to cyclic drag at the in-line resonance condition are

where d/B 5 (0.0127 m)/(0.0222 m) 5 0.5197

Sd 5 GSP FM’ Pd 5 (286.4)(1000)(12 420 Pa) 5 3.558 3 10 9 Pa 5 3 558 MPa

From eq. (6-3-3), the force per unit area due to cyclic drag is identical to that obtained in para. 8-2.5.1, Step 2:

Step 3. The stress concentration factor is taken from the recommendations of para. 6-12.3:

Using eq. (6-10-6), the cyclic stresses due to cyclic drag at the in-line resonance condition are

Kt 5 2.3

Sd 5 GRD FM’ Pd 5 (137.3)(1000)(124 200 Pa) 5 1.706 3 109 Pa 5 1706 MPa

Pd 5 12 420 Pa

Step 4. Evaluate combined drag and lift stresses, with lift stress set to zero [eq. (6-12-3)]: So ,max 5 Kt ( Sd 2  SL 2 )

1/ 2

Step 3. The stress concentration factor is obtained from eq. (6-12-4), replacing A/b with B/bs:

5 Kt Sd 5 8 183 MPa

Kt 5 1.1  0.033 ( B / bs ) 5 1.1  0.033(3.969) 5 1.231

Step 5. Evaluate the temperature de-rating factor from eq. (6-12-6):

Step 4. Evaluate combined drag and lift stresses, with lift stress set to zero [eq. (6-12-3)]:

FT 5 E(T ) / Eref 1.91 3 1011 MPa 5 1.95 3 1011 MPa 5 0.9795

So ,max 5 Kt ( Sd 2  SL 2 ) 5 Kt Sd 5 2 100 MPa

1/ 2

The environmental de-rating factor, FE, is taken as unity for this service.

Step 5. The de-rating factors are identical to those obtained in para. 8-2.5.1, Step 5:

Step 6. Compare the predicted stress with the fatigue stress limit, given by the right-hand side of eq. (6-12-5):

FT 5 0.9795

The environmental de-rating factor, FE, is taken as unity for this service.

FT FES f 5 (0.9795)(1.0)(37.2 MPa) 5 36.44 MPa

Step 6. Compare the predicted stress with the fatigue stress limit, given by the right-hand side of eq. (6-12-5):

The fatigue stress limit, 36.44 MPa, is less than the combined stress, 8 183 MPa. The thermowell would not pass the cyclic stress condition for steady-state operation at the in-line resonance, corresponding to a fluid velocity of 16.01 m/s, if the vortex shedding frequency, fs, had been greater than 0.4 f nc .

FT FES f 5 (0.9795)(1.0)(37.2 MPa) 5 36.44 MPa

The fatigue stress limit, 36.44 MPa, is less than the combined stress, 2 100 MPa. The thermowell would not pass the cyclic stress condition for steady-state operation at the in-line resonance, corresponding to a fluid velocity of 16.01 m/s, if the vortex shedding frequency, fs, had been greater than 0.4 f nc .

8-2.5.2  Evaluation at the Base of the Reduced-Diameter Shank Step 1. The flow velocity is identical to that obtained in para. 8-2.5.1, Step 1:

8-2.6 Steady-State Stress at the Design Velocity

VIR 5 16.01 m/s

The steady-state stress shall be evaluated at both the support plane and at the base of the reduced-diameter shank. The thermowell shall pass the steady-state stress criteria at both locations.

Step 2. Evaluate cyclic drag stress at the support plane, which is the thermowell root in this case. The magnification factor, F’M , for the drag or in-line resonance is set at 1,000 (see para. 6-8.3). Begin by evaluating the value of GRD using eq. (6-10-10): GRD 5 5

8-2.6.1  Evaluation at the Support Plane Step 1. Evaluate the radial, tangential, and axial stresses due to the external pressure, at the location of maximum stress [eqs. (6-11-1) through (6-11-3)]:

16LS 2 4 pB 1 2 ( d / B)  16(0.0635 m)2 2

2

(

p(0.0127 m) 1 2 0.5197 5 137.3

Sr 5 P 5 0.400 MPa 4

) 36

Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

St 5 P

1  ( d / A )2

Sa 5

1 2 ( d / A )2 1  (0.2973)2 5 (0.400 MPa) 1 2 (0.2973)2 5 0.44776 MPa

Sa 5

5 (0.400 MPa) 5 0.5480 MPa

1 1 2 (0.2973)2

PD 5 0.06782 MPa

P

5 0.4388 MPa

Step 3. Evaluate the steady-state stress due to the drag force [eq. (6-10-4)]:

Step 2. Evaluate steady-state drag stress at the support plane. First, evaluate the steady-state drag force per unit area:

SD 5 GRD PD 5 137.3(0.06782 MPa) 5 9.31 MPa

1

PD 5  CDV 2 2 1 5 968.8 kg/m 3 1.4 (10 m/s)2 2 5 0.06782 MPa

(

)

Step 4. Before using the Von Mises criterion to assess the stress limit at the step-shank root, compute the maximum stress given by eq. (6-12-1):

Step 3. Evaluate the steady-state stress due to the drag force [eq. (6-10-4)]:

Smax 5 SD  Sa 5 9.862 MPa

SD 5 GSP PD 5 286.4(0.06782 MPa) 5 19.42 MPa

Step 5. Compute the left-hand side of the Von Mises criteria [eq. (6-12-2)]:

Step 4. Before using the Von Mises criterion to assess the stress limit at the root, compute the maximum stress given by eq. (6-12-1):

LHS 5

(Smax 2 Sr )

 (Smax 2 St )  (St 2 Sr )

5 19.42 MPa

2

RHS 5 1.5S 5 1.5(122 MPa) 5 183 MPa

2

2

The Von Mises stress, 9.317 MPa, does not exceed the stress limit, 183 MPa, and the thermowell passes the steady-state stress criterion at the base of the step shank.

Step 6. Compute the stress limit given by the right-hand side of the Von Mises criteria [eq. (6-12-2)]:

8-2.7 Dynamic Stress at the Design Velocity

RHS 5 1.5S 5 1.5(122 MPa) 5 183 MPa

The dynamic stress shall be evaluated at both the support plane and at the base of the reduced-diameter shank. The thermowell shall pass the dynamic stress criteria at both locations.

The Von Mises stress, 19.42 MPa, does not exceed the stress limit, 183 MPa, and the thermowell passes the steady-state stress criterion at the support plane.

8-2.6.2  Evaluation at the Base of the ReducedDiameter Step Shank

8-2.7.1  Evaluation at the Support Plane Step 1. The magnification factor for the lift (transverse) and drag (in-line) resonances are given by eqs. (6-9-1) and (6-9-2), respectively:

Step 1. Evaluate the radial, tangential, and axial stresses due to the external pressure, at the location of maximum stress [eqs. (6-11-1) through (6-11-3), but with B replacing A]:

160.6 Hz fs 5 5 0.2947 f nc 545.0 Hz 1 1 5 5 1.095 FM 5 1 2 r 2 1 2 0.2947 2 r5

Sr 5 P 5 0.400 MPa St 5 P

1  (d / B)2 1 2 (d / B)2

5 (0.400 MPa)

2 f s 2 (160.6 Hz ) 5 5 0.5895 545.0 Hz f nc 1 1 5 1.532 FM′ 5 2 5 1 2 0.58952 12 (r′ )

1  (0.5197 )2 1 2 (0.5197 )

2

Step 6. Compute the stress limit given by the right-hand side of the Von Mises criteria [eq. (6-12-2)]:

Step 5. Compute the left-hand side of the Von Mises criteria [eq. (6-12-2)]: LHS 5

(Smax 2 Sr )2  (Smax 2 St )2  (St 2 Sr )2

5 9.317 MPa

Smax 5 SD + Sa 5 19.86 MPa

2

1 1 2 (0.5197 )2

Step 2. Evaluate steady-state drag stress at the base of the step shank. The steady-state drag force per unit area is the same as in para. 8-2.6.1, Step 2:

1 2 ( d / A )2

5 (0.400 MPa)

P 1 2 (d / B)2

r′ 5

2

5 0.66960 MPa

37 Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

Step 2. Using eq. (6-3-3), the force per unit area due to cyclic drag and lift is

Pl 5 48 440 Pa 5 0.04844 MPa

1 Pd 5  CdV 2 2 1 5 (968.8 kg/m 3 )(0.1)(10 m/s)2 2 5 4 844 Pa 5 0.004844 MPa 1 Pl 5  ClV 2 2 1 5 (968.8 kg/m 3 )(1.0)(10 m/s)2 2 5 48 440 Pa 5 0.04844 MPa

Step 3. Evaluate the dynamic drag and lift stresses at the base of the reduced-diameter shank [eqs. (6-10-5) and (6-10-6)]. The cyclic stresses due to drag and lift are Sd 5 GRD FM’ Pd 5 (137.3)(1.532)(0.004844 MPa) 5 1.020 MPa SL 5 GRD FM Pl 5 (137.3)(1.095)(0.04844 MPa) 5 7.286 MPa

The concentration factor is identical to the value calculated in para. 8-2.5.2, Step 3, Kt 5 1.231.

Step 3. Evaluate the dynamic drag and lift stresses at the support plane [eqs. (6-10-5) and 6-10-6)]. The cyclic stresses due to drag and lift are

Step 4. Evaluate combined drag and lift stresses, eq. (6-12-3):

(

So ,max 5 Kt Sd 2  SL 2

Sd 5 GSP FM’ Pd 5 (286.4)(1.532)(0.004844 MPa) 5 2.126 MPa SL 5 GSP FM Pl 5 (286.4)(1.095)(0.04844 MPa) 5 15.19 MPa

Step 5. The temperature de-rating factor is identical to the value calculated in para. 8-2.5.2, Step 5, FT 5 0.9795. The environmental de-rating factor, FE, is taken as unity for this service. Step 6. Compare the predicted stress with the fatigue stress limit, given by the right-hand side of eq. (6-12-5):

)

1/ 2

2 2 5 2.3 ( 2.126 MPa )  (15.19 MPa )  5 35.29 MPa

1/ 2

5 9.056 MPa

Step 4. Evaluate combined drag and lift stresses, eq. (6-12-3):

(

1/ 2

2 2 5 1.231 (1.020 MPa )  ( 7.286 MPa ) 

The concentration factor is identical to the value calculated in para. 8-2.5.1, Step 3, Kt 5 2.3. So ,max 5 Kt Sd 2  SL 2

)

FT FES f 5 (0.9795)(1.0)(37.2 MPa) 5 36.44 MPa

1/ 2

The predicted stress of 9.056 MPa is below the fatigue stress limit, and the thermowell passes the dynamic stress criterion at the base of the reduced-diameter step shank.

Step 5. The temperature de-rating factor is identical to the value calculated in para. 8-2.5.1, Step 5, FT 5 0.9795. The environmental de-rating factor, FE, is taken as unity for this service.

8-2.8 Pressure Stress Compute the external pressure rating for the shank using eq. (6-13-1):

Step 6. Compare the predicted stress with the fatigue stress limit, given by the right-hand side of eq. (6-12-5):

 2.167  Pc 5 0.66S  2 0.0833  / 2 B B d 2 ( )   2.167   2 0.0833  5 0.66(122 MPa)  ( . 2 0 0 1 27 m)/(0.0127 m − 0.0066 m)   5 35.20 MPa

FT FES f 5 (0.9795)(1.0)(37.2 MPa) 5 36.44 MPa

The predicted stress of 35.29 MPa is below the fatigue stress limit, and the thermowell passes the dynamic stress criterion at the support plane.

Compute the external pressure rating for the tip using eq. (6-13-2):

8-2.7.2  Evaluation at the Base of the ReducedDiameter Shank

Pt 5

Step 1. The magnification factors are the same as in para. 8-2.7.1, Step 1:

5

S  t 0.13  d 

2

122 MPa  0.0048 m  0.13  0.0066 m 

2

5 496.4 MPa

FM 5 1.095 FM′ 5 1.532

The pressure rating for the thermowell is the lesser of Pt and Pc, which is 35.20 MPa in the present case. This rating exceeds the operating pressure, and the thermowell passes the external pressure criterion.

Step 2. The force per unit area due to cyclic drag and lift are the same as in para. 8-2.7.1, Step 2: Pd 5 4 844 Pa 5 0.004844 MPa

38 Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

Section 9 Statement of Compliance 9-1 SPECIFICATION OF A THERMOWELL

factor of Ha,f 5 1 and sensor-mass factors calculated using the default value of s, unless the fluid density and sensor mass are specifically stated. When velocity and pressure ratings are stated by a thermowell supplier for cases when the fluid properties, including anticipated impurities, are not known, such ratings shall include a note that the ratings apply only to noncorrosive service. If the fluid properties, including anticipated impurities, are known and included in thermowell ratings, the statement of velocity and pressure ratings by the thermowell supplier shall fully describe fluid properties needed for the calculations and material considerations described in this Standard. The temperature or applicable range of temperatures, for velocity and pressure ratings, shall be stated by the supplier.

Specification of a thermowell, including details of its intended installation and all intended operating conditions, is the responsibility of the designer of the system that incorporates the thermowell. The designer of that system is also responsible for ensuring the thermowell is compatible with the process fluid and with the design of the thermowell installation in the system. The supplier of the thermowell should state that calculations to demonstrate compatibility of the thermowell with those operating conditions specified by the designer are in conformance with this Standard, subject to the requirements detailed in subsection 9-2.

9-2 VELOCITY AND PRESSURE RATINGS Velocity and pressure ratings stated by a thermowell supplier shall be calculated using the fluid density

39 Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

Section 10 References [13]  Ogura, K., Morishita, M., and A. Yamaguchi, 1998, “Cause of Flow-Induced Vibration of Thermocouple Well,” Transactions of the ASME, Pressure Vessel and Piping Conference, 363, 109–117. [14]  Morishita, M., and Wada, Y., 1998, “Fatigue Analysis of Thermowell Due to Flow-Induced Vibration,” Transactions of the ASME, Pressure Vessel and Piping Conference, 363, 119–124. [15]  Odahara, S., Murakami, Y., Inoue, M., and Sueoka, A., 2005, “Fatigue Failure by In-Line FlowInduced Vibration and Fatigue Life Evaluation,” JSME Journal, Series A, 48, 109–117. [16]  Ramberg, S. E., 1983, “The Effects of Yaw and Finite Length Upon the Vortex Wakes of Stationary and Vibrating Cylinders,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 128, 81–107. [17]  Lide, D., ed., 2008, CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 89th Edition, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. [18]  ASTM International, 2009, Standard Specification for Carbon Steel Forgings for Piping Applications, ASTM A105/ A105M-09, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. [19]  Davis, J. R., ed., 1998, Metals Handbook Desk Edition, 2nd Edition, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. [20]  ASTM International, 2009, Standard Specification for Forged or Rolled Alloy and Stainless Steel Pipe Flanges, Forged Fittings, and Valves and Parts for High-Temperature Service, ASTM A182/A182M-09a, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

10-1 REFERENCED DOCUMENTS [1]  Murdock, J. W., 1959, “Power Test Code for Thermometer Wells,” ASME Journal Engineering Power, 403–416. [2]  Blevins, R. D., 2001, Flow-Induced Vibration, 2nd Edition, Krieger, Malabar, FL. [3]  Blevins, R. D., Tilden, B. W., and Martens, D. H., 1996, “Vortex-Induced Vibration and Damping of Thermowells,” Transactions of the ASME, Pressure Vessel and Piping Conference, 328, 465–484. [4]  Zdravkovich, M. M., 1997, Flow Around Circular Cylinders: Vol. 1: Fundamentals, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. [5]  Sakai, T., Iwata, K., Morishita, M., and Kitamura, S., 2001, “Vortex-Induced Vibration of a Circular Cylinder in Super-Critical Reynolds Number Flow and Its Suppression by Structure Damping,” JSME International Journal, Series B, 44, 712–720. [6]  Iwata, K., Morishita, M., Sakai, T., Yamaguchi, A., Ogura, K., 2001, “Evaluation of Turbulence-Induced Vibration of a Circular Cylinder in Supercritical Reynolds Number Flow,” JSME Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers International Journal, Series B, 44, 721–728. [7]  Blevins, R. D., 2009, “Models for Vortex Induced Vibration of Cylinders Based on Measured Forces,” ASME Journal of Fluids Engineering, 131, paper 101203. [8]  International Association of the Properties of Water and Steam, 2009, “Releases and Guidelines,” available at http://www.iapws.org, accessed March 6, 2009. [9]  National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), 2009, NIST Chemistry Webbook, NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69, http://webbook.nist. gov/chemistry, accessed March 6, 2009. [10]  Brock, J. E., 1974, “Stress Analysis of Thermowells,” Report NPS–59B074112A, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA. [11]  Energy Institute, 2008, Guidelines for the Avoidance of Vibration Induced Fatigue in Process Pipework, 2nd Edition, Energy Institute, London. [12]  Morishita, M., and K. Dozaki, 1998, “History of Flow-Induced Vibration Incident Occurred in Monju,” Transactions of the ASME, Pressure Vessel and Piping Conference, 363, 103–108.

10-2 REFERENCED ASME DOCUMENTS ASME B16.5-2003, Pipe Flanges and Flange Fittings ASME B31.1-2007, Power Piping ASME B31.3-2008, Process Piping ASME B40.200-2008, Thermometers, Direct Reading and Remote Reading: ASME B40.9, “Thermowells for Thermometers and Elastic Temperature Sensors” ASME BPVC III-A, Appendices, 2007 Edition ASME BPVC VIII, Division 1, 2007 Edition ASME BPVC VIII, Division 2, 2007 Edition ASME BPVC VIII, Division 3, 2007 Edition Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), Three Park Avenue, New York , NY 10016-5990; Order Department, 22 Law Drive, P.O. Box 2900 Fairfield, NJ 07007

40 Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

NONMANDATORY APPENDIX A CONVERSION FACTORS of pounds per square inch (psi or lbf/in.2), which is not equivalent to the derived unit of pressure resulting from the combination of pounds, inches, and seconds: lb/(in.⋅sec2). To convert pounds-force per square inch (psi or lbf/in.2) to lb/(in.⋅sec2), multiply by 386.088. (b) Many sources express fluid viscosity in units of centipoise (1 centipoise 5 0.01 poise). The centipoise is neither an SI unit nor a U.S. Customary unit, but can be converted using the following conversion factors:

A-1 Conversion Factors Between SI and U.S. Customary Units (a) To convert inches (in.) to meters, multiply by 0.0254. (b) To convert pounds-force (lbf) to newton (kg⋅m/ s2), multiply by 4.448 222. (c) To convert pounds-force per square inch (psi or lbf/in.2) to pascal (Pa), multiply by 6.894 757 3 103.

(1) To convert centipoise (cP) to lb/(ft⋅sec), multiply by 6.714 × 104. (2) To convert centipoise (cP) to pascal second (Pa⋅s), multiply by 0.001.

A-2 Other Conversion Factors (a) Within the U.S. Customary units system, pressures and elastic moduli are commonly given in units

41 Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

42 Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

ASME Services ASME is committed to developing and delivering technical information. At ASME’s Information Central, we make every effort to answer your questions and expedite your orders. Our representatives are ready to assist you in the following areas:

ASME Press Codes & Standards Credit Card Orders IMechE Publications Meetings & Conferences Member Dues Status

Member Services & Benefits Other ASME Programs Payment Inquiries Professional Development Short Courses Publications

Public Information Self-Study Courses Shipping Information Subscriptions/Journals/Magazines Symposia Volumes Technical Papers

How can you reach us? It’s easier than ever! There are four options for making inquiries* or placing orders. Simply mail, phone, fax, or E-mail us and an Information Central representative will handle your request.

Mail ASME 22 Law Drive, Box 2900 Fairfield, New Jersey 07007-2900

Call Toll Free US & Canada: 800-THE-ASME (800-843-2763) Mexico: 95-800-THE-ASME (95-800-843-2763) Universal: 973-882-1167

Fax—24 hours 973-882-1717 973-882-5155

E-Mail—24 hours [email protected]

* Information Central staff are not permitted to answer inquiries about the technical content of this code or standard. Information as to whether or not technical inquiries are issued to this code or standard is shown on the copyright page. All technical inquiries must be submitted in writing to the staff secretary. Additional procedures for inquiries may be listed within.

Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

PERFORMANCE TEST CODES (PTC)

General Instructions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 1-2004 (R2009) Definitions and Values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 2-2001 (R2009) Fired Steam Generators. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 4-1998 Coal Pulverizers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 4.2-1969 (R2009) Air Heaters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 4.3-1974 (R1991) Gas Turbine Heat Recovery Steam Generators. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 4.4-2008 Steam Turbines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 6-2004 Steam Turbines in Combined Cycles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 6.2-2004 Appendix A to PTC 6, The Test Code for Steam Turbines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 6A-2000 (R2009) PTC 6 on Steam Turbines — Interpretations 1977–1983. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 6 Guidance for Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainty in Performance Tests of Steam Turbines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 6 Report-1985 (R2003) Procedures for Routine Performance Tests of Steam Turbines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 6S-1988 (R2009) Centrifugal Pumps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 8.2-1990 Performance Test Code on Compressors and Exhausters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 10-1997 (R2009) Fans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 11-2008 Closed Feedwater Heaters. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 12.1-2000 (R2005) Performance Test Code on Steam Surface Condensers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 12.2-1998 (R2007) Performance Test Code on Deaerators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 12.3-1997 (R2009) Moisture Separator Reheaters. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 12.4-1992 (R2009) Single Phase Heat Exchangers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 12.5-2000 (R2005) Reciprocating Internal-Combustion Engines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 17-1973 (R2003) Hydraulic Turbines and Pump-Turbines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 18-2002 Test Uncertainty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 19.1-2005 Pressure Measurement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 19.2-1987 (R2004) Temperature Measurement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 19.3-1974 (R2004) Flow Measurement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 19.5-2004 Measurement of Shaft Power . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 19.7-1980 (R1988) Flue and Exhaust Gas Analyses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 19.10-1981 Steam and Water Sampling, Conditioning, and Analysis in the Power Cycle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 19.11-2008 Data Acquisition Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 19.22-2007 Guidance Manual for Model Testing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 19.23-1980 (R1985) Particulate Matter Collection Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 21-1991 Gas Turbines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 22-2005 Atmospheric Water Cooling Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 23-2003 Ejectors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 24-1976 (R1982) Pressure Relief Devices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 25-2008 Speed-Governing Systems for Hydraulic Turbine-Generator Units . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 29-2005 Air Cooled Heat Exchangers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 30-1991 (R2005) Air-Cooled Steam Condensers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 30.1-2007 Ion Exchange Equipment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 31-1973 (R1991) Waste Combustors With Energy Recovery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 34-2007 Measurement of Industrial Sound . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 36-2004 Determining the Concentration of Particulate Matter in a Gas Stream . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 38-1980 (R1985) Steam Traps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 39-2005 Flue Gas Desulfurization Units . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 40-1991 Wind Turbines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 42-1988 (R2004) Performance Test Code on Overall Plant Performance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 46-1996 Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Power Generation Plants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 47-2006 Fuel Cell Power Systems Performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 50-2002 (R2009) Ramp Rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PTC 70-2009 Performance Monitoring Guidelines for Steam Power Plants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .PTC PM-2010 The ASME Publications Catalog shows a complete list of all the Standards published by the Society. For a complimentary catalog, or the latest information about our publications, call 1-800-THE-ASME (1-800-843-2763).

Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

Copyright c 2010 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME.

ASME PTC 19.3 TW-2010

C07410