ASME IX Interpretation-Part5
Short Description
Download ASME IX Interpretation-Part5...
Description
页码，1/37
GO TO ASME.ORG HOME >
Interpretation Detail Print to PDF Please limit your selection on the search results screen to 10 interpretations. Standard Designation: BPV Section IX Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description: Date Issued:
Record Number:
Interpretation Number :
Section IX, Weld Metal Deposit Analysis as a Variable for Welder Performance Qualification for Gas Tungsten-Arc Welding, QW-356 11/17/1983
BC79-046* IX-79-52R
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: In QW-356 (GTAW) of Section IX, no reference is made to weld metal analysis (as described by A-Numbers) as being an essential variable. Does this mean that a welder may qualify with one F-No. 6 electrode and automatically be qualified for the use of all other F-No. 6 electrodes (regardless of A-Number designation) provided all other essential variables of QW-356 are satisfied and provided the initial test conditions conform to the requirements set forth in QW-310.4 (for carbon steel bare wire) or QW310.5 (for stainless steel bare wire)? Reply: Yes.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-432
Record Number:
BC80-435*
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
11/17/1983 IX-80-52R
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: If a welder is qualified to weld with the GTAW process with an F-No. 6 filler metal of weld metal analysis other than A-No. 8 or 9, is he qualified to weld with an F-No. 6 filler metal of weld metal analysis A-No. 8 or 9, or vice versa, all other essential variables being the same? Reply: Yes.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX,QW-407.1(b), PWHT
Record Number:
BC82-097*
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
Question(s) and Reply(ies):
09/20/1982 IX-81-30R
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码，2/37
Question (1): A manufacturer's WPS to weld P-No. 4 to P-No. 4 metals specifies a minimum preheat temperature of 150°C (302°F) with PWHT at 593°C: (1099°F) to 650°C (1202°F). The supporting PQR to this WPS shows PWHT was performed at 700° C (1292°F) to 720°C (1328°F). Does the PWHT of the PQR support this WPS? Reply (1): Yes.
Question (2): When qualifying a WPS, a welded tensile test specimen of SA-106 Gr. A (48,000 psi UTS) failed at 45,600 psi, which is 95% of the UTS of the pipe, the UTS of the failed specimen conforms to QW-153(d). May this WPS be used to weld P-No. 1 to P-No. 1 metals using 70,000 psi filler metal which is other than the A-Number and F-Number shown on the PQR? Reply (2): No. See QW-404.4. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, Use of Consumable Inserts
Record Number:
BC82-245
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
07/02/1982 IX-83-06
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): A consumable insert is fused between two test coupons using GTAW process and no filler wire, the remaining passes deposited by the SMAW process. For welder qualification, is the welder qualified to make a field weld with the GTAW process and using bare wire (E 70S2) over the consumable insert? Reply (1): No.
Question (2): If the GTAW process has qualified the welder to make such a deposit over the consumable insert, although he has not made a deposit in the qualification test, then would the welder's qualification of the GTAW process allow the welder to make a deposit with the GTAW process and the use of bare filler wire without the consumable insert having been preplaced? Reply (2): No. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-452
Record Number:
BC82-246
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
07/02/1982 IX-83-07
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: A welder has been qualified for a thickness of deposited weld metal from 1/16 in. to 3/4 in. for a particular welding process. A 3/4 in. thick pipe is to be welded in production, using a single-vee butt joint, with the same process for which the welder is qualified. Is a second welder
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码，3/37
required to deposit the weld reinforcement, or is it permissible for the welder who completes the weld to deposit the reinforcement?
Reply: A second welder is not required to deposit the weld reinforcement. It is permissible for the welder who completes the weld to deposit the weld reinforcement. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-451
Record Number:
BC82-265
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
07/02/1982 IX-83-08
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: A welding procedure for a particular process has been qualified on 3/8 in. thick material. Weld reinforcement was removed during preparation of test specimens for mechanical testing. A 3/4 in. thick pipe is to be welded in production using this qualified procedure. May the finished weld include the reinforcement permitted by the Code [for example, Section VIII, Division 1, UW-35(c)], or must the finished weld be flush with the surface of the base metal? Reply: The finished weld may include the reinforcement permitted by the applicble Code.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-282.6(m)
Record Number:
BC82-279
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
07/02/1982 IX-83-09
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Under the requirements of QW-282.6(m), does a 15% change in the amount of dust recorded on the PQR mean that an allowable range for particle fines is the amount of dust plus or minus 15% of that amount, or the amount of dust plus or minus 15%? Reply: QW-282.6(m) requires that the allowable range for particle fines be the amount of dust plus or minus 15%.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-404.4
Record Number:
BC82-299
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
Question(s) and Reply(ies):
07/02/1982 IX-83-10
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码，4/37
Question: A procedure was qualified with 521 bare wire (now classified as ER 90S-B3 or ER 90S-B3L). Is procedure requalification required when ER 90S-B3 or ER 90S-B3L is substituted for 521 bare wire? Reply: No. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-404.13 and QW-404.28
Record Number:
BC83-563
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
01/13/1984 IX-83-100
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: A welder successfully qualifies using a P-No. 1 test coupon and a carbon steel consumable insert A-No. 1. Is he qualified to weld stainless steel P-No. 8 production welds using a stainless steel consumable insert A-No. 8? Reply: Yes.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-310.5(c) and QW-311(a)
Record Number:
BC83-529
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
01/16/1984 IX-83-101
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): Can the thickness of the test metal used for qualifying a corrosion-resistant weld metal overlay procedure, to weld on a base metal thickness of 25 mm (1 in.) or greater, be more than the base metal thickness used for production? Reply (1): Yes. See QW-214.1.
Question (2): Do the requirements of QW-311 apply to procedure qualification? Reply (2): No.
Question (3): Does a welder/welding operator who qualifies for a groove joint also qualify for welding corrosion-resistant weld metal overlay, or vice versa? Reply (3): No. See QW-311.
Question (4): If a welder successfully qualifies a fillet weld procedure, does this also qualify him for performance? Reply (4): Yes. See QW-203 and QW-301.2.
Question (5): Is a welder who is qualified to weld P-No. 8 to P-No. 8 base metal with an F-No. 5 electrode using SMAW also qualified to weld
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码，5/37
combinations of P-No. 6 and P-No. 7 base metals with F-No. 5 electrodes using SMAW? Reply (5): Yes, within the limits of the essential variables of QW-353.
Question (6): Is QW-310.5(c) applicable only when the filler metal does not belong to F-Nos. 41 through 45? Reply (6): No. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-451.1
Record Number:
BC83-551
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
01/19/1984 IX-83-102
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: In Note (1) of QW-451.1, QW-403.2, .3, .6, .9, and .10 are listed. Do these variables apply to and further restrict the thickness of deposited weld metal qualified, even though they are base metal variables? Reply: No. In Note (1) of QW-451.1, only QW-407.4 applies to both base metal and deposited weld metal thickness.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-403.11, QW-407.4
Record Number:
BC82-300
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
07/02/1982 IX-83-11
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): There exists a PQR for P-No. 5 to P-No. 5 materials with PWHT of 1400F. Can this PQR be used in accordance with QW-403.11 to support a WPS for P-No. 5 to P-No. 1 materials with a PWHT to be conducted at 1400°F? Reply (1): No. PWHT of P-No. 1 material at 1400F is between the upper and lower transformation temperatures. QW-407.1(a)(5) requires separate qualification for this condition.
Question (2): For the PQR and WPS described in Question (1), is the maximum base metal thickness of the WPS limited to 1.1 times the base metal thickness of the PQR per QW-407.4 since the critical temperature of the P-No. 1 material has been exceeded? Reply (2): The critical temperature range of the P-No. 1 material has not been exceeded; therefore, QW-407.4 does not apply. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
BPV Section IX
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码，6/37
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-200
Record Number:
BC82-341
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
07/02/1982 IX-83-12
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: A manufacturer has written and qualified a WPS for use at a particular jobsite. Assuming there are no changes in the essential or supplementary essential variables, is it necessary for this manufacturer to requalify the procedure for use at other jobsites? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-321
Record Number:
BC82-346
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
07/02/1982 IX-83-13
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: A welder failed a radiographic performance qualification test and subsequently received further training. If he again attempts to qualify, must he be retested in accordance with QW-321? Reply: No, since he has received further training he may be tested in accordance with QW-304.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-450
Record Number:
BC82-302
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
09/17/1982 IX-83-14
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): A welder is qualified by depositing 2 mm of GTAW on a 2 mm base metal, and 10 mm of SMAW on a 10 mm base metal. Is this welder qualified to make a combination weld deposit of 4 mm GTAW root, and 16 mm SMAW fill on a 20 mm base metal? Reply (1): Yes.
Question (2): A welder is qualified in combination by depositing 2 mm of GTAW root using a consumable insert, and 8 mm of SMAW fill on 10 mm base metal. If the welder then qualifies on an open butt joint by depositing 2 mm of GTAW on a 2 mm base metal, could he make a combination weld deposit of 4 mm GTAW root, and 16 mm SMAW fill on a 20 mm base metal, using either a consumable insert or open butt? Reply (2): Yes.
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码，7/37
Question (3): Would a 1½ in. procedure test coupon having 3/4 in. GTAW and 3/4 in. SMAW weld deposits qualify a procedure for 8 in. maximum base metal and 8 in. deposited weld metal thicknesses with either or both processes? Reply (3): Yes. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-463.1(b), QW-211
Record Number:
BC82-388
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
09/17/1982 IX-83-15
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Is it acceptable to prepare more than one coupon and remove part of the required specimens (including impact tests) from each coupon when qualifying a Welding Procedure Specification? Reply: Yes. See the provisions for small diameter pipe in QW-461.1(e) and QW-462.3(a) and the provisions for impact specimens in QW-170.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-452
Record Number:
BC82-396
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
09/17/1982 IX-83-16
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Is a welder who passes a groove-weld test for all positions (6G or 2G and 5G) qualified to make fillet welds on all diameters of pipe and tube? Reply: Yes.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-100.1
Record Number:
BC82-422
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
09/17/1982 IX-83-17
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: A manufacturer has a mass production, assembly-line type of facility. A welder makes the same type of weld in the same process using the same type and size electrodes in the same position. The welder only has control over the current, voltage, and travel speed variables of a WPS. Does this manufacturer meet the requirements of QW-100.1 by only supplying the welder with information needed from the WPS rather than the entire WPS?
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码，8/37
Reply: Yes. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-451.1
Record Number:
BC82-423
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
09/17/1982 IX-83-18
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: A groove-weld test coupon consisting of 3/8 in. thick base metal having the same P-Numbers is welded using the GMAW short circuiting mode process to deposit a 1/8 in. thick root pass and using a second welding process to complete the weld. What are the thickness ranges of base metal and deposited weld metal for which the procedure is qualified? Reply: The base metal thickness range qualified is restricted by essential variable QW-403.10 from 1/16 in. to 0.4125 in. The deposited weld metal thickness range qualified for the GMAW short circuiting mode process is restricted by Note (1) of QW-451.1 and QW-451.2 from 1/16 in. to 0.1375 in. The deposited weld metal thickness range qualified for the second process is from 1/16 in. to 1/2 in.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-304
Record Number:
BC82-440
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
09/17/1982 IX-83-19
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Can a welder be qualified by radiographic examination when using a combination of the following welding processes: GTAW, 2 passes; GMAW (short circuiting), 1 pass; and GMAW (spray arc), balance? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-403
Record Number:
BC82-496
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
09/17/1982 IX-83-20
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: May an existing PQR for joining P-No. 4 to P-No. 7 base materials with an E 309 filler metal, also qualify a WPS for welding P-No. 4 to P-No. 4 base materials and P-No. 7 to P-No. 7 base materials using the same filler metal with all other essential variables remaining the same? Reply: No.
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码，9/37
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-300
Record Number:
BC82-499
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
09/17/1982 IX-83-21
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: A company has a testing laboratory qualify a welder to a qualified procedure meeting their requirements. The welder works for that company for about 30 days and quits. May another company with similar welding requirements buy a copy of his qualification (which is good up to 90 days) from the testing laboratory or must he be requalified by the second company? Reply: The welder must be retested by the second company. QW-103.1 and QW-300.2 state that responsibility for welder qualification rests with the manufacturer or contractor and cannot be delegated to another.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-404.22, QW-452.3
Record Number:
BC82-516
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
09/17/1982 IX-83-22
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Is it permissible for a welder to weld a consumable insert in a ½ in. diameter pipe on the following two separate qualifications with all other performance variables being the same? Test (1) - GTAW, open butt root, ½ in. diameter pipe Test (2) - GTAW, consumable insert root, 1 in. diameter pipe Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-452.3
Record Number:
BC82-530
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
09/17/1982 IX-83-23
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: A welder is qualified with a given procedure to 1/2 in. thickness in all positions. The welder is then given a procedure qualification test plate to weld in the flat position to extend the WPS to 2 in. maximum thickness. Is the welder then performance qualified to weld up to 2 in. in all positions? Reply: No. See QW-301.2.
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码，10/37
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-432
Record Number:
BC82-588
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
09/17/1982 IX-83-24
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: In QW-432.1, SFA-5.4 filler metals are listed as F-No. 4 for ferritic materials and F-No. 5 for austenitic materials. How are SFA-5.4 martensitic filler materials to be categorized relative to QW-432.1?
Reply: SFA-5.4 martensitic filler materials should be categorized as F-No. 4.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-200
Record Number:
BC81-160
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
09/28/1982 IX-83-25
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): A parent company has WPS's qualified by a wholly owned subsidiary. Both parent company and subsidiary have "N" Certificates of Authorization. If the parent company changes its name, is it necessary to change the WPS's to reflect the new name on the revised Certificates of Authorization? Reply (1): No, provided there is documented traceability from the new company name to the WPS qualified under the old company name.
Question (2): A WPS is qualified using a filler material not listed in ASME Section II, Part C. Does the WPS have to be requalified if a later edition of Section II, Part C, incorporates this material?
Reply (2): No, provided all filler material specification requirements remain the same. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-409 and QW-200.2
Record Number:
BC82-182
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
11/08/1982 IX-83-26
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): Is it a requirement of Section IX that the voltage and amperage used to make the welding procedure qualification be recorded on the Procedure Qualification Record (PQR), or on other documents that are retained by the Certificate Holder, when the shielded metal-arc or gas tungsten-arc welding process is used and impact testing is not required?
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码，11/37
Reply (1): No.
Question (2): Is it a requirement of Section IX that the actual dimensions of the tensile test specimens and the actual tensile test loads be recorded on the PQR, or on other documents that are retained by the Certificate Holder, when the actual tensile test results are recorded on the PQR? Reply (2): No. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-254
Record Number:
BC82-713
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
11/15/1982 IX-83-27
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: In Section IX, Summer 1982 Addenda, QW-254 lists QW-404.9 as an essential variable for SAW and lists QW-404.12 as a nonessential variable for SAW. Is changing from an electrode classification in an SFA specification to any other electrode classification an essential variable? Reply: Yes.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-461.9
Record Number:
BC82-748
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
11/15/1982 IX-83-28
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Apart from welding in 2FR position itself, what other positions qualify a welder for 2FR?
Reply: Positions 2F, 4F, 5F (see QW-461.6) and all groove-weld positions except 1G (see QW-461.5 and QW-303.1) will qualify a welder for 2FR.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-407.1 and QW-407.2
Record Number:
BC82-763
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
11/15/1982 IX-83-29
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: For procedure qualification under QW-407.1 and QW-407.2, is "post heating" at 572° ± 18°F for 7 hr for the purpose of hydrogen removal immediately following welding considered to be a "postweld heat treatment" below the lower transformation temperature per QW-407.1(a)
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码，12/37
(2)? Both "post heating" and "postweld heat treatment" are independently defined in QW-492. Reply: No. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-407.1
Record Number:
BC82-243
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
11/16/1982 IX-83-30
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: If a weldment undergoes annealing, then normalizing (heat treatment above the critical range) followed by heat treatment below the critical range, will a welding procedure qualified with normalizing followed by heat treatment below the critical range meet the requirements of QW407.1 where no impact requirements exist? Reply: Yes.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-301.2
Record Number:
BC82-395
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
11/16/1982 IX-83-31
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Does a welder who successfully welds a fillet weld procedure qualification test coupon, also qualify and/or satisfy the performance qualification requirements? Reply: Yes. See QW-301.2.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-301.4
Record Number:
BC82-598
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
11/16/1982 IX-83-32
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: A manufacturer maintains performance qualification records in a central file which is not accessible to production personnel. A computer printout is supplied to the production personnel listing welders' names and their qualifications. Are the requirements of QW-301.4 ("...ranges qualified...") satisfied if an additional document, listing the limitations of the ranges qualified in the performance qualification, is provided? Reply: Yes.
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码，13/37
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-409.1
Record Number:
BC82-617
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
11/16/1982 IX-83-33
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: When qualifying a WPS using a combination of SMAW and SAW with notch toughness a requirement, is it a requirement of the Code that QW-409.1 permits increases in heat input or volume of deposited weld metal for a WPS qualified with a postweld, grain refining, austenitizing heat treatment? Reply: Yes.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, P-Number Listings for Castings
Record Number:
BC82-514
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
01/19/1983 IX-83-34
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Two casting material specifications have the same chemical and processing requirements. One of the specifications requires a tensile specimen, the other does not. The specification requiring a tensile specimen has been assigned a P-Number, the other specification has not. Can the specification not listed in QW-422 be considered the same P-Number as the material listed in QW-422? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-407.4 and QW-403.11
Record Number:
BC82-599
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
01/19/1983 IX-83-35
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: In accordance with QW-403.11, a PQR using P-No. 5 material which has been postweld heat treated (PWHT) at 1400°F is to be used to back up a WPS for P-No. 1 to P-No. 5 material with PWHT. Does the maximum base metal thickness on the WPS have to be limited to 1.1 times the base metal thickness on the PQR since the lower critical temperature of the P-No. 1 material has been exceeded? Reply: Yes.
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码，14/37
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-451
Record Number:
BC82-757
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
01/19/1983 IX-83-36
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Does a 0.375 in. thick groove-weld coupon for weld procedure qualification qualify a 0.500 in. thick shell to 3.000 in. thick end plate groove-weld joint? Reply: No. See QW-202.4(b).
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-404
Record Number:
BC82-770
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
01/19/1983 IX-83-37
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: If a WPS qualified in accordance with the requirements of Section IX lists E7018A-1 as the filler metal, would a new WPS be required if E7015A-1 were used in production welding and all other variables remain the same? Reply: Yes. See QW-200.1.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-151
Record Number:
BC82-771
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
01/19/1983 IX-83-38
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: A manufacturer qualifies a WPS using a 1/4 in. root pass in a 3 in. thick plate coupon. Is it acceptable to machine the 3 in. thick coupon to 1/4 in. thick tensile specimens, or must 3 in. thick tensile specimens be taken if the WPS is to be qualified to weld a 1/4 in. root pass in 3 in. plate? Reply: One-quarter inch thick tensile specimens may be used.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description: Date Issued:
BPV Section IX Section IX, QW-201 01/19/1983
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码，15/37
Record Number:
Interpretation Number :
BC82-792 IX-83-39
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: For organizations which invoke the requirements of Section IX but are not required by their code to have any interface with the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Committee, may the requirements of QW-201 be satisfied by having the manager of a subsidiary company state in an official letter that the subsidiary company is under the operational control of the parent company for welding procedure qualifications? Reply: ASME cannot determine rules for organizations not involved with Code applications.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description: Date Issued:
Record Number:
Interpretation Number :
BPV Section IX Section IX, Q-11(5), Welder Qualification, 1971 Edition, Winter 1973 Addenda 01/19/1983 BC82-794 IX-83-40
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): Is it a requirement of Section IX, 1971 Edition, Winter 1973 Addenda, that a welder performance qualification test on alloy steels (Q-23, nominal not to exceed 6%) can be substituted for carbon steels, and vice versa? Reply (1): Yes.
Question (2): A welder performs a qualification test on A-588. (Note that there is no P-Number assigned to this material.) Is he also qualified to weld P-No. 1 materials, provided all essential variables are met?
Reply (2): Yes, provided the manufacturer has qualified welding procedures for A-588 and P-No. 1 materials. Question (3): Is it a requirement of Section IX, 1971 Edition, Winter 1973 Addenda, for procedure qualification of impact tested material [Q-11(b)(5)] that the voltage, amperage, and travel speed are within the range specified in the Welding Procedure Specification? Reply (3): Yes.
Question (4): According to Section IX, 1971 Edition, Winter 1973 Addenda, do the Procedure Qualification Records have to demonstrate the most extreme ends of the specified ranges of the WPS? Reply (4): No. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description: Date Issued:
BPV Section IX Section IX, Q-11(b)(3), 1971 Edition, Winter 1973 Addenda 01/19/1983
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码，16/37
Record Number:
Interpretation Number :
BC82-796 IX-83-41
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): In accordance with Section IX, 1971 Edition, Winter 1973 Addenda, where impact testing is required, is it permissible to exceed the maximum specified interpass temperature on the WPS in the welding of the test coupon for qualification? Reply (1): Yes.
Question (2): In accordance with Section IX, 1971 Edition, Winter 1973 Addenda, Q-11(b)(3), if the original WPS does not specify maximum interpass temperature, would the insertion on the WPS of the measured temperature encountered during qualification be in violation of Section IX? Reply (2): No. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-310.4
Record Number:
BC82-803
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
01/19/1983 IX-83-42
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): A welder is qualified to a qualified welding procedure (SMAW) process, to weld P-No. 5 to P-No. 5 base metal, using an F-No. 4 filler metal. By virtue of this qualification and the provisions of QW-310.4, is the noted welder qualified to weld P-No. 1 to P-No. 1 base metal (SMAW) process, using F-No. 4 filler metal (all other performance essential variables being the same, i.e., position, thickness, etc.)? Reply (1): No.
Question (2): Is the data contained on the required Performance Qualification Record (WPQ), which was generated as proof of the welder's qualification for welding P-No. 5 to P-No. 5, considered to be acceptable proof of qualification for welding P-No. 1 to P-No. 1? Reply (2): No. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-451.1
Record Number:
BC82-822
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
01/19/1983 IX-83-43
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): Does QW-451.1, Note (3), permit either side or face and root bends for coupon thicknesses of 1/16 in. to 3/8 in., inclusive? Reply (1): No. See revision of Note (3) published in the Winter 1982 Addenda to Section IX.
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码，17/37
Question (2): A test coupon has GTAW root and SMAW fill. How many and what type of bend tests are required to meet QW-451.1, Note (4)(c)? Reply (2): For one or two processes, two root and two face bends or four side bends are required.
Question (3): A test coupon is made with three or more processes. How many and what type of bend tests are required to meet QW-451.1, Note 4 (c)? Reply (3): Four side bends. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-461.9
Record Number:
BC82-838
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
01/19/1983 IX-83-44
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): Must the range of diameters of pipe to be welded in production be listed on the WPS? Reply (1): No.
Question (2): Does QW-461.9 define the limits of production positions qualified for procedure qualification? Reply (2): No. QW-461.9 applies to performance qualification.
Question (3): Must the position of welding be defined in the WPS? Reply (3): Yes. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, Welding of Non-Code Materials
Record Number:
BC82-385
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
01/20/1983 IX-83-45
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Does a non-Code material, such as AISI 1018, used for attachments to vessel walls constructed of materials which are Code materials, such as P-No. 1, require a separate procedure qualification? Reply: Yes.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description:
BPV Section IX Section IX, QW-404.9
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码，18/37
Date Issued:
03/11/1983
Interpretation Number :
IX-83-46
Record Number:
BC82-751
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): If a particular submerged-arc wire/flux combination does not conform to an SFA specification classification, may one use that wire/flux combination, and by what paragraph?
Reply (1): Yes, by the provisions of QW-404.5 which requires an A-Number or the nominal chemical composition of the weld deposit to be stated. This composition may also be designated by the manufacturer's trade designation, AWS classification, or established procurement documents. Question (2): If a particular submerged-arc wire/flux combination does not conform to an SFA, may the user perform the test required by the appropriate SFA specification, and then consider the combination to be classified? Reply (2): No.
Question (3): If a particular submerged-arc wire/flux combination is used for procedure qualification, that combination is recorded on the PQR by manufacturer's trade name, and the WPS limits welding to that particular wire/flux combination by manufacturer's trade name, must the SFA specification classification, F-Number, and A-Number be recorded on the PQR and WPS?
Reply (3): No, provided the requirements of QW-404.4 and QW-404.5 are met.
Question (4): The previous edition of SFA 5.17 and 5.23 do not indicate the "as-welded" or "heat treated" condition as part of the wire/flux classification. May the old designations be used on new WPS's or new PQR's?
Reply (4): The old designation may be used on new WPS's supported by old PQR's. The old designation may not be used on new PQR's or WPS's supported by them. Question (5): In the latest edition of SFA 5.23, the heat treatment condition for the filler metal is specified for various classifications. Must the WPS designate this same heat treatment, or may other heat treatments described in QW-407.1 be specified? Reply (5): The heat treatments specified in SFA 5.23 are for classification of filler metal only, and they have no relationship to heat treatment specified in a WPS or qualified in a PQR. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-404.13
Record Number:
BC82-790
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
Question(s) and Reply(ies):
03/11/1983 IX-83-47
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码，19/37
Question: Does the combination of the below two PQR's support a new WPS covering GTAW welding of plate thickness 1/6 in. to 2 in. using open butt groove joint?
Variable WPS No. 1 WPS No. 2 Joint Open groove Open groove Root Consumable insert F-No. 6 ERXXX Remainder F-No. 6 ERXXX F-No. 6 ERXXX Base metal thickness 1 in. 1/4 in. Base metal limits 3/16 in. to 2 in. 1/16 in. to ½ in. Tee-weld thickness 3/16 in. to 2 in. 1/16 in. to ½ in. Reply: No. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-214.1
Record Number:
BC82-870
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
03/11/1983 IX-83-48
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): Can a qualification done on a 4-3/4 in. (120 mm) plate in accordance with QW-214.1 be used to clad on production base metal of 1-5/8 in. (42 mm), 2 in. (52 mm), and 4 in. (100 mm)? Reply (1): Yes.
Question (2): What is the maximum production base metal thickness on which this procedure can be used? Reply (2): There is no maximum thickness limit. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QB-402.3
Record Number:
BC82-871
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
03/11/1983 IX-83-49
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Is the thickness range (as stated in QB-402.3) of a Brazing Procedure Specification (BPS) to be used on a piping or tubing system, applicable only to piping or tubing, or does it also apply to the fittings (elbows, tees, etc.) and components (valve, filters, etc.) used in the socket type (lap) connections of that system? Reply: No, the thickness range also applies to fittings and components.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description: Date Issued:
BPV Section IX Section IX, QW-405.2 03/11/1983
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码，20/37
Record Number:
Interpretation Number :
BC82-872 IX-83-50
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: We are required to fabricate 18 in. diameter pipe manufactured from plate of A-537 to A-710 metal. Will the following qualifying conditions meet the requirements of QW-405.2 for all position welding where impacts are required, provided all other variables remain the same?
Joint - open butt groove Plate - A-537 to A-710 Position - 3G Root- E7010, G downhill Hot pass - E7010, G downhill Remainder- E8018, C3 uphill Reply: Yes, except the E7010G passes are not qualified for vertical uphill progression.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-466
Record Number:
BC82-881
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
03/11/1983 IX-83-51
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: QW-466 gives several diagrams of devices for bending of bend test specimens. May any device which bends the specimen around a radius as small as that required by the tables in QW-466 be used, provided the entire weld is included in the bent portion? Reply: Yes.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-191
Record Number:
BC83-001
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
03/11/1983 IX-83-52
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): For welder/welding operator performance qualification coupons with nominal outside diameters of 3-1/2 in, (89 mm) or less, is it permissible to radiograph the circumferential butt weld using a double-wall technique, single-wall viewing with a source side penetrameter placed on the I.D. of the pipe? Reply (1): No,
Question (2): For welder/welding operator performance coupons with nominal outside diameters of 3-1/2 in, (89 mm) or less, is it permissible to radiograph the circumferential butt weld using a double-wall offset technique, double-wall viewing with a source side penetrameter placed on the outside of the coupon, opposite the film? Reply (2): No,
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码，21/37
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-484 and QW-461.9
Record Number:
BC83-002
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
03/11/1983 IX-83-53
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Is it a Section IX requirement that welders are not allowed to weld in qualified position unless all of the qualified positions are indicated on the manufacturer's records of welder qualification test as shown in QW484? Reply: No, the actual test position in which qualification was done shall be recorded on the Performance Qualification Record.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-200.2(b)
Record Number:
BC83-042
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
03/11/1983 IX-83-54
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Is it permissible to revise a WPS which utilizes SMAW or GTAW, and change the current and/or voltage range(s) outside of the limitations of the original WPS and outside of the current and/or voltage range(s) recorded on the applicable Procedure Qualification Record, without performing an additional procedure qualification test (supplementary essential variables are not a factor of this inquiry)? Reply: Yes.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-351
Record Number:
BC83-059
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
03/11/1983 IX-83-55
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): Based on the qualification under the two conditions below, is the welder qualified to weld over 1 in. diameter pipe using F-No. 1 through F-No. 4 electrodes by the SMAW process? Variable Condition 1 Condition 2 Joint Open groove Open groove Backing None Argon gas Base metal A-53 P-No. 1 A-335 P-No. 22 Diameter 5 in. Sch. 60(.432) 2 in. Sch. 40(.219) Electrode F-No. 4 E7018 F-No. 5 E309 Position 6G 6G Reply (1): Yes, provided the pipe O.D. is 2-7/8 in. or greater.
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码，22/37
Question (2): Based on the qualification under the two conditions shown in Question (1), is the welder qualified to deposit F-No. 5 weld metal to a thickness of 0.864 in. by the SMAW process? Reply (2): No. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-403.11
Record Number:
BC83-078
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
03/11/1983 IX-83-56
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: A Welding Procedure Specification has been developed joining P-No. 4 to P-No. 5. Will this procedure qualification test also qualify a welding procedure using identical essential variables for welding P-No. 4 to P-No. 4 materials? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-304
Record Number:
BC83-079
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
03/11/1983 IX-83-57
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Does QW-304 limit the use of radiographic examination for qualification using GMAW to those electrodes designated as SFA-5.18? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-322
Record Number:
BC83-086
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
03/11/1983 IX-83-58
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: What is the definition of the word "process" as it is used in QW322? Reply: The word "process" refers to those welding processes for which welding variables have been established in QW-350 and QW-360.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
BPV Section IX
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码，23/37
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-404.9
Record Number:
BC82-614
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
03/14/1983 IX-83-59
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Is it permissible to change designators ("X's") within a classification in Table 4 in SFA-5.17, and Table 7 in SFA-5.23, without requalifying the procedures? An example of this would be changing from F7AZ-EM12K to F7AZ-EM13K? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-163
Record Number:
BC82-749
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
06/01/1983 IX-83-60
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): For guided-bend specimens, corner cracks of what length are permitted? Reply (1): Corner cracks may be of any length.
Question (2): For guided-bend specimens, are corner cracks originating from a defect acceptable? Reply (2): Yes.
Question (3): For guided-bend specimens, should corner cracks originating from a defect be considered? Reply (3): Yes.
Question (4): For guided-bend specimens, what is the acceptance criteria for corner cracks on corrosion-resistance overlay? Reply (4): 1/16 in.
Question (5): Is grinding of corrosion-resistant overlay weld ripples on weld specimens acceptable? Reply (5): Yes.
Question (6): Is cold straightening of overlay bend specimens objectionable?
Reply (6): Section IX neither requires nor prohibits cold straightening.
Note: In the original letter of March 14, 1983, sent to the inquirer, Reply (4) read incorrectly as 1/6 in., rather than 1/16 in. as shown above. Standard Designation:
BPV Section IX
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码，24/37
Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-404.9
Record Number:
BC82-831
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
03/14/1983 IX-83-61
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Does QW-404.9 allow a change of electrode classification for the electrodes listed in SFA-5.9 without requalification of the procedure, provided the flux does not change? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description: Date Issued:
Record Number:
Interpretation Number :
BPV Section IX Section III, Division 1, - NX-4331, Conformance to Section IX Requirements; NX-4362, Essential Variables for Automatic and Semiautomatic Welding 03/28/1983 N183-004 IX-83-62
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): Is it permissible when qualifying welding of specially designed seals to the requirements of Section III, NB-4362, to use types of base metal specifications listed in QW-422 of Section IX for grouping of P-Number base metals for qualifications? Reply (1): No, P-Number equivalents may not be used.
Question (2): When qualifying a welding procedure, do the requirements of Section IX have precedence over the requirements of Section III of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code? Reply (2): No, a welding procedure is qualified in accordance with Section IX as supplemented or modified by NX-4000. Question (3): Is it permissible to use SA-213 Type 304 and SA-312 Type 304 material for qualification tests in lieu of SA-182 F-304 and SA-336 F-304 for seal weld qualification when SA-336 F-304 and SA-182 F-304 are the materials that will be used in the production weld? Reply (3): Yes.
Note: This Interpretation also appears as III-1-83-104. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, SMAW Performance Qualification
Record Number:
BC83-122
Date Issued:
05/09/1983
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码，25/37
Interpretation Number :
IX-83-63
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: A welder is qualified welding P-No. 5 to P-No. 5 with the SMAW process and F-No. 4 filler metal. Is this welder qualified to weld P-No. 1 to P-No. 1 metal using the SMAW process and F-No. 4 filler metal? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-451
Record Number:
BC83-222
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
05/09/1983 IX-83-64
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): A 1-1/2 in. thick double V-groove joint test coupon was welded using SMAW for 3/4 in. and GTAW for 3/4 in. What is the range of base metal qualified? Reply (1): Per QW-451, the range of base metal qualified is 3/16 in. to 8 in. Question (2): What is the range of deposited weld metal qualified for each process? Reply (2): Per QW-451, the maximum range of deposited weld metal qualified is 8 in. with no minimum limitation. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-462.1(a)
Record Number:
BC83-225
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
05/09/1983 IX-83-65
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: QW-151.1 states that the reduced-section specimen conforming to QW-462.1(a) may be used for tension tests. It goes on to state: "A single specimen of full-plate thickness shall be used for thicknesses up to and including 1 in." If the original thickness of a test coupon is measured to be 0.500 in., is a test specimen prepared according to QW-462.1 (a) and measured to be 0.499 in. thick acceptable? Reply: Yes.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-452.1 and QW-452.3
Record Number:
BC83-058
Date Issued:
05/10/1983
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码，26/37
Interpretation Number :
IX-83-66
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Can pipe groove qualification per QW-452.3 and thickness limit qualification per QW-452.1 be combined to qualify a welder over 1 in. O.D. and thickness range 1/16 in. to unlimited for a process, if a welder has been qualified on 2 in. Schedule 80 and 6 in. Schedule XXH for that process? Reply: Yes.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-452
Record Number:
BC83-123
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
05/10/1983 IX-83-67
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: For pressure vessels constructed in accordance with Section VIII, Division 1, what type of performance qualification should be made when qualifying a welding operator with a tube end welding gun? Reply: At the present time, Section IX has no special performance qualification requirements for welding operators to make tube-to-tubesheet welds with a tube end welding gun. See QW-361.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-201
Record Number:
BC83-040
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
06/27/1983 IX-83-68
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: A contractor's association desires to standardize procedure and performance qualification such that, after initial qualification, a welder can transfer from one organization to another without requalification. Is this acceptable under the requirements of QW-201? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-410.25
Record Number:
BC83-233
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
06/27/1983 IX-83-69
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: QW-410.25 states: "A change from manual or semiautomatic to machine or automatic welding and vice versa." This variable is a nonessential variable for procedure when using the SMAW, SAW, GMAW,
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码，27/37
and GTAW processes. Should this also be an essential variable for performance for these processes?
Reply: No. QW-492 gives definitions for both welders and welding operators. These definitions, in conjunction with the requirements of Article III, provide separate performance qualification requirements for welders and welding operators. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-310.5(c)
Record Number:
BC83-270
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
06/27/1983 IX-83-70
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: A manufacturer has qualified WPS for welding P-Nos. 41 through 45 with the SMAW process using the appropriate filler metals. May a welder be qualified using the SMAW process for welding P-Nos. 41 through 45 by welding a test coupon of these P-Numbers or combinations thereof, or P-No. 1 welded to itself or to any of the above P-Numbers using the filler metal of the qualified WPS? Reply: Yes.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-402.10
Record Number:
BC83-230
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
06/28/1983 IX-83-71
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: A procedure was qualified using a carbon steel material which was welded using the SMAW process on a double-welded butt joint. The qualified procedure specified a range of root gaps from 1.5 mm to 2.0 mm. During production welding, the root gap is sometimes less than the range indicated on the WPS. Must the procedure be requalified to include these root gaps less than 1.5 mm.?
Reply: No. However, since QW-402.10 is a nonessential variable for the SMAW process, the original WPS must be revised or a new WPS written to encompass these root gaps.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-200.2
Record Number:
BC83-269
Date Issued:
06/28/1983
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码，28/37
Interpretation Number :
IX-83-72
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: When qualifying a Welding Procedure Specification, may the welding of the test coupons be done by more than one welder? Reply: Yes.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-466.1
Record Number:
BC82-866
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
06/29/1983 IX-83-73
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: For WPS qualification of F-No. 35 weld metal on P-No. 1 base metal (QW-214), is the minimum required thickness of the side-bend specimen 3/8 in.? Reply: Yes.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-466.1
Record Number:
BC82-867
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
06/29/1983 IX-83-74
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: For WPS qualification of F-No. 35 weld metal on P-No. 1 metal (QW-214), is the maximum mandrel diameter of 6-2/3 t (2½ in.) used for the side-bend tests in QW-466.1, QW-466.2, and QW-466.3? Reply: Yes.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-463.2(g)
Record Number:
BC83-149
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
06/29/1983 IX-83-75
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Is it permissible, when conducting a performance qualification test using the test assembly shown in QW-463.2(g), to weld the fixed vertical (2G) portion of the test between the 270 deg. and 360 deg. reference lines instead of the 225 deg. through 315 deg. reference lines? Reply: No.
Standard Designation:
BPV Section IX
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码，29/37
Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description:
Section IX, QB-463, QB-181, QB-452.1, Note (1), and QB-141.4
Record Number:
BC83-248
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
06/29/1983 IX-83-76
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): QB-463.1 (e) and QB-463.2(c) state: "For coupons 3 in. O.D. or less, two coupons are required for peel or section tests. One specimen shall be removed from each coupon." Does this mean there shall be two horizontal and two vertical coupons, altogether four specimens? Reply (1): Yes.
Question (2): QB-181, last sentence, states: "The sum of the length of unbrazed areas on either side, considered individually, shall not exceed 20% of the length of the joint overlap." If there are four specimens, as per above, then should there be eight percentages that do not exceed 20%? In other words, will there be twice as many percentages as specimens? Reply (2): Yes. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-351
Record Number:
BC83-253
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
09/19/1983 IX-83-77
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Can weld reinforcement be considered for determining the test coupon thickness (or deposited weld metal thickness) per QW-351? Reply: No.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, Tables QW-450 vs Fig. QW-461
Record Number:
BC83-300
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
09/19/1983 IX-83-78
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: In QW-451 and QW-452, does t apply to the actual weld metal thickness deposited in a test coupon or does it apply to the specimen thickness shown in QW-462? Reply: As used in QW-451 and QW-452, t applies to the deposited weld metal thickness within the thickness T of the test coupon.
Standard Designation:
BPV Section IX
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码，30/37
Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-251.2
Record Number:
BC83-358
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
09/19/1983 IX-83-79
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: A welding procedure has been previously qualified to satisfy all requirements, including notch toughness in the weld and heat affected zone. When there is a change in the supplementary essential variables, is it necessary only to prepare an additional test coupon with the plate only long enough to provide necessary notch-toughness specimens? Reply: Yes.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-200.4
Record Number:
BC83-388
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
09/19/1983 IX-83-80
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Do the requirements of Section IX allow the welding of combined production joints when the individual processes are qualified separately but one process has a qualified base metal maximum thickness less than the production base metal thickness? Reply: No. See QW-200.4.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-451.1
Record Number:
BC83-395
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
09/19/1983 IX-83-81
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): In the Winter 1982 Addenda to Section IX, the minimum values for "Thickness t of Deposited Weld Metal Qualified" in QW-451.1 were deleted. Does this mean there are no minimum thickness qualifications for deposited weld metal? Reply (1): When determining the minimum thickness qualifications per QW-451.1, Notes (1) and (2) must also be considered. In those cases where the further limitation of these Notes does not apply, there is no limit on the minimum thickness qualification. Question (2): If impact tests are required for an SMAW procedure qualification, may the thickness limitations of Note (1) of QW-451.1 be overridden in determining the minimum deposited weld metal thickness qualification?
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码，31/37
Reply (2): No. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-400
Record Number:
BC83-303
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
09/20/1983 IX-83-82
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): Are the requirements of QW-403.7 met by bend testing in accordance with QW-451.2? Reply (1): Yes.
Question (2): If a WPS was qualified for fillet welds only to the requirements of QW-451.3, would the variables of QW-403.6, QW-403.9, and QW-403.10 apply if they were made mandatory by the use of the applicable processes? Reply (2): Yes.
Question (3): Do the requirements of QW-405.2 apply to fillet welds made in the vertical position uphill progression (when welding in the 3F or 5F position)? Reply (3): Yes.
Question (4): Do the requirements of QW-406.2 pertain to preheat temperature during welding, and after welding is complete and prior to postweld heat treatment? Reply (4): Yes.
Question (5): When QW-404.12 is referenced as a supplementary essential variable, is requalification required of an SMAW procedure qualified using an SFA-5.5, E7018-A1 electrode when an SFA-5.5, E7018-C2L electrode is substituted? Reply (5): Yes. See QW-404.5.
Question (6): When QW-404.12 is referenced as a supplementary essential variable, is requalification required of an SMAW procedure qualified using an SFA-5.5, E7018-XX electrode when an SFA-5.5, E8018-XX electrode is substituted? Reply (6): Yes.
Question (7): When QW-404.12 is referenced as a supplementary essential variable, is requalification required of an SMAW procedure qualified using an SFA-5.1, EXX18 electrode and an SFA-5.5, EXX18-XX electrode is substituted? Reply (7): Yes, except where permitted by QW-404.5. Standard Designation:
BPV Section IX
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码，32/37
Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description:
Section IX, Combination Weld Qualifications
Record Number:
BC83-394
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
09/20/1983 IX-83-83
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: A combination weld is made on a 3/4 in. thick double-Vee groove-welded test coupon using 1/4 in. GTAW at the root of the doubleVee groove. This weld is completed using 1/4 in. SMAW on one side of the double-Vee groove weld and 1/4 in. SMAW on the second side, all other variables remaining the same. What is the maximum deposited weld metal thickness qualified for each process for both procedure and performance qualification? Reply: For the GTAW process, the maximum is 1/2 in., and for the SMAW process, the maximum is 1 in.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-404.9
Record Number:
BC83-398
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
09/20/1983 IX-83-84
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: In accordance with QW-404.9, does a change in the wire classification, with no change in the flux composition, F-Number, or A-Number, require requalification? Reply: Yes.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, SI Units in a WPS and PQR
Record Number:
BC83-003
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
09/29/1983 IX-83-85
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Excluding Manufacturer's Data Reports, is it permitted to use SI Units in manufacturer's documents such as WPS's and PQR's without the accompanying U.S. Customary Units? Reply: Yes. While the Code does not address this subject, it has been an accepted practice.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
BPV Section IX
Para./Fig./Table No:
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码，33/37
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-407.2
Record Number:
BC83-294
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
11/21/1983 IX-83-86
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Does a Welding Procedure Qualification made with nonnormalized base metal of SA-516 specification also qualify for use of normalized base metal of SA-516, or vice versa? Reply: Yes.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, Use of Base Metal as a Filler Metal
Record Number:
BC83-340
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
11/21/1983 IX-83-87
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Is it acceptable to qualify a WPS in accordance with Section IX using a base metal as a filler metal? Reply: Yes. See QW-404.4
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-451.1 and QW-452.1
Record Number:
BC83-396
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
11/21/1983 IX-83-88
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: If the deposited weld metal thickness qualification limitations are changed in Section IX, may earlier qualification thickness limits be revised on the WPS to conform to the new requirements? Reply: Yes.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-404.14
Record Number:
BC83-402
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
11/21/1983 IX-83-89
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): Is it permissible to remelt the cover pass of a completed SMAW weld using the GTAW process without the addition of filler metal? The WPS for the GTAW process was qualified using filler metal. Reply (1): No.
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码，34/37
Question (2): A GTAW process has been qualified with the addition of filler metal. Is it permissible to weld the root of a groove weld using the GTAW process without the addition of filler metal? Reply (2): No. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-452.1
Record Number:
BC83-407
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
11/21/1983 IX-83-90
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): Can a double-beveled plate, 1 in. thick with each beveled groove being of 1/2 in., be welded by a welder qualified to weld a weld metal deposit of 0.864 in.? Reply (1): No.
Question (2): Can the same joint as above be welded by two individual welders, each with a deposited weld metal qualification of 0.864 in., provided each welder does not exceed 0.864 in.? Reply (2): Yes. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-304
Record Number:
BC83-528
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
11/21/1983 IX-83-91
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: When qualifying a welder using radiographic examination, as permitted in QW-304, do the qualified thickness ranges in QW-452.1 apply? Reply: Yes.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-403.5
Record Number:
BC83-530
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
11/21/1983 IX-83-92
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: A procedure has been qualified to satisfy all requirements, including notch toughness, for welding P-No.l, Gr-No.1 to P-No.l, Gr-No.1 base metals. Is it necessary to make a procedure qualification test to
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码，35/37
determine notch toughness only (QW-401.3) for welding P-No.l, Gr-No.2 to P-No.1, Gr-No.2 base metals, with all other essential variables the same? Reply: Yes. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, Butt Weld Repair
Record Number:
BC83-531
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
11/21/1983 IX-83-93
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: A groove-weld procedure has been qualified for base metal and deposited weld metal thicknesses of 0.644 in. It is necessary to make a weld repair of 0.438 in. on a 2 in. thick base metal. Is it necessary to requalify the procedure in accordance with Section IX for the 2 in. thick base metal? Reply: Yes.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-451.1
Record Number:
BC83-284
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
01/13/1984 IX-83-94
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Is the procedure qualification thickness in QW-451.1 based on the test coupon thickness and not on the test specimen thickness? Reply: Yes.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-151.2(d) and QW-462.1(e)
Record Number:
BC83-301
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
01/13/1984 IX-83-95
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: When QW-462.1(e) is utilized for tensile testing of pipe equal to or less than 3 in. O.D., are multiple tensile specimens required? Reply: Yes. See QW-451.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
BPV Section IX
Para./Fig./Table No:
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码，36/37
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-404.9
Record Number:
BC83-442
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
01/13/1984 IX-83-96
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question (1): Would a WPS which was qualified in December 1977 using a flux classification of F70-EL12 require requalification if the flux classification were changed to any of the following: F70-EM12K, F72EM12K, or F74-EM12K (provided no other variables are changed and notch toughness is not a factor)? Reply (1): Yes.
Question (2): Will one PQR (P-No.1 Gr. No. 2 to itself; see PQR No.1 below) meeting notch-toughness requirements of Section VIII, Division 1, and Section IX support three WPS's (WPS Nos. 1, 2, and 3 below) when all three specify the same essential, supplemental essential, and nonessential variables, except group numbers, as the one followed in welding the procedure qualification test coupon (WPS No. 1)? PQR No. 1 -- P-No. 1 Gr. No. 2 to itself WPS No. 1 -- P-No. 1 Gr. No. 2 to itself WPS No. 2 -- P-No. 1 Gr. No. 1 to itself WPS No. 3 -- P-No. 1 Gr. No. 1 to P-No. 1 Gr. No. 2 Reply (2): No. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-404.13 and QW-403.8
Record Number:
BC83-444
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
01/13/1984 IX-83-97
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Does the combination of the two PQR's below support a new WPS covering the GTAW welding of the root pass in an open single-Vee or single-J groove weld for the base metal thickness range 1/16 in. to 8 in.? Variable PQR No. 1 PQR No. 2 Joint Single-J groove Single-Vee groove Root layer Consumable insert F-No. 6 ERXXX Second layer F-No. 6 ERXXX [Note (1)] F-No. 6 ERXXX Remainder SMAW F-No. 6 ERXXX Base metal 2.10 in. 0.28 in. Base metal limit T 3/16 in. to 8 in. 1/16 in. to 0.56 in. Deposited weld metal t GTAW 3/8 in. max. 0.56 in. max. SMAW 8 in. max. NOTE: (1) Combined thickness of consumable insert and second layer is 3/16 in. Reply: No. Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No: Subject Description: Date Issued:
BPV Section IX Section IX, QW-303.1 01/13/1984
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
页码，37/37
Record Number:
Interpretation Number :
BC83-450 IX-83-98
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: Is a welder who qualifies on plate in the 3G and 4G positions qualified to weld all diameters of tubing/pipe fillet welds? Reply: Yes.
Standard Designation: Edition/Addenda:
Para./Fig./Table No:
BPV Section IX
Subject Description:
Section IX, QW-100.3
Record Number:
BC83-472
Date Issued:
Interpretation Number :
01/13/1984 IX-83-99
Question(s) and Reply(ies): Question: In 1983 a PQR was generated by qualifying a WPS to the 1977 Edition of Section IX. Can this WPS be used for fabrication meeting the requirements of the 1983 Edition of Section IX? Reply: Yes, provided the PQR and WPS meet all the requirements of the 1983 Edition of Section IX.
Copyright © 2016 by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. No reproduction may be made of this material without written consent of ASME
https://cstools.asme.org/Interpretation/InterpretationDetail.cfm
2016/5/4
View more...
Comments
