AS/NZS 4360:2004 THE AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND STANDARD ON RISK MANAGEMENT...
AS/NZS 4360:2004 THE AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND STANDARD ON RISK MANAGEMENT Kevin W Knight CHAIRMAN ISO WORKING GROUP - RISK MANAGEMENT TERMINOLOGY MEMBER STANDARDS AUSTRALIA / STANDARDS NEW ZEALAND JOINT TECHNICAL COMMITTEE OB/7 - RISK MANAGEMENT P0 BOX 226, NUNDAH QLD 4012 E-mail:
[email protected] [email protected]
Taking a risk: it isn’t all bad • Risk taking is positive, not implicitly negative • We take risks not to avoid harm, but to achieve benefits and gains • Taking risks is a normal unavoidable u navoidable everyday necessity • Taking controlled, informed risks is a sensible sen sible and everyday essential part of life • The higher the risk the higher the reward • Without risk there is no progress.
MANAGING RISK • We all manage risk consciously or unconsciously - but rarely systematically • Managing risk involves both threats and opportunities • Managing risk requires rigorous thinking • Managing risk means forward thinking • Managing risk requires accountability in decision making • Managing risk requires communication • Managing risk requires balanced thinking • RM provides a framework to facilitate more effective decision making
Corporate Governance The way in which an organisation is governed and controlled in order to achieve its objectives. objectives. The control environment makes an organisation reliable in achieving these objectives within an acceptable degree of risk. It is the glue which holds the organisation together in pursuit of its objectives while risk management provides the resilience.
Corporate Governance As I look back on my career as an independent director, I realise that my efforts were mostly futile. Management gave us reams of information about past performance and we dutifully discussed it. We were looking at the wrong information and asking the wrong questions. We should have focussed on the future and questioned the strategy and competence of managementt to execute it. managemen it. The board did not wake up until it was too late Guidance for Directors - Dealing with risk in the boardroom, Canadian Institute of Chartered Accounts, 2000
Risk Management as Defined in AS/NZS 4360:2004 “THE CULTURE, PROCESSES AND
STRUCTURES THAT ARE DIRECTED TOWARDS REALISING POTENTIAL OPPORTUNITIES WHILST MANAGING ADVERSE EFFECTS.”
C O M M U N I C A T E
C O N S U L T
1. Strategic Ct
2. Identify Threats
M O N I T O R &
A S S E S S
3. Analyze 4. Assess
5. Assess/
R E V I E W
ESTABLISH THE CONTEXT The External Context The Internal Context The Risk Management Context Develop Criteria & Define the Structure
C O M M U N I C A T E & C O N S U L T
IDENTIFY RISKS What can happen, when, where, how & why
ANALYSE RISKS Identify existing controls Determine Determine Likelihood Consequences Determine Level of Risk
M O N I T O R &
EVALUATE RISKS Compare with criteria? Set priorities
Treat Risks
NO
YES TREAT
RISKS
Identify options Assess options Prepare and Implement treatment options
R E V I E W
RM is everybody’s business • RM is not just the responsibility of management • For RM to be effective it must be implemented by every person in the organisation • RM must become an integral part of the organisational culture • The risk makers and risk takers must be the risk managers.
Step 1 : Establish the Context
Step 2 : Identify Risks
Step 3 : Analyse Risks
• external context • internal context • risk management context • risk criteria (i.e. threshold levels) • define the structure
• what can happen, when, where and how • identify key processes, tasks, activities • recognise risk areas • define risks • categorise risk
• identify controls • determine likelihood • determine consequence/impact • determine level of risk
Step 6 : Monitor and Review Risks • process • environment • organisation • strategy • stakeholders
Accept/Retain • based on judgement or documented procedures/policy
Communicate and consult - at all steps
Step 5 : Treat Risks
Step 4 : Evaluate Risks • identify tolerable/unacceptable risks (referring risk rating against risk criteria) • prioritise risks for treatment
Share • insurance • outsourcing
Avoid
Reduce likelihood
• consider discontinuing or avoiding activity • consult • risk treatment preferable to risk aversion
• controls • process improvement • training & education • policies and communication • audit and compliance
Reduce consequence • Business Continuity Plans • contractual arrangements • public relations
Communication & Consultation in the risk management process
COMMUNICATE & CONSULT • ANY TWO-WAY DIALOGUE BETWEEN STAKEHOLDERS • DEVELOP COMMUNICATION STRATERGY AT THE CONTEXT STAGE • ENSURE STAKEHOLDERS PERCEPTATION OF RISK IS ADDRESSED
ACCOUNTABILITY SUPERVISION Potential greater future role of risk management
GOVERNANCE
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT
Traditional and current risk management application
MANAGEMENT
EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT DECISION & CONTROL OPERATIONAL MANAGEMENT
Risk Management’s Role in Corporate Governance
STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR MANAGING RISKS
Risk
Business Strategies
Taking Risks
Risk Adding Value
Communication Consultation
Managing Risk
Preserving Value Business Processes
C O M M U N I C A T E
ESTABLISH THE CONTEXT The External Context The Internal Context The Risk Management Context Develop Criteria & Define the Structure
ANALYSE RISKS
M O N I T O R
EVALUATE RISKS
&
IDENTIFY RISKS
& C O N S U L T
Tolerate Risks
YES TREAT
RISKS
NO
R E V I E W
ESTABLISH THE CONTEXT • Objectives and environment • Relevant Legislation • Stakeholder identification & analysis • Government Policy • Corporate Policy • Management Structures • Community Expectations • Criteria • Consequence Consequence criteria.
Stories (business experiences)
Rituals & Routines
Symbols
An Organisation’s Paradigm
Control Systems
Power Structures
Organisational Structures
Adapted from Johnson & Scholes, 1993, p.61
ORGANISATIONAL RISK CRITERIA Organisation risk personality or propensity Strategic management decision
Indecision Irresponsible
Aversion Denial
Risk tolerance range
Dislike Disinclination
Corporate culture
Impulsive
Excessive appetite
Board of Directors Approves policy Approves risk limits Approves risk tolerance Provides oversight
Risk Management Committee Monitor - Coordinate - Teach Measure - Benchmark Report to Board Enforce
Line Managers Identify risk Propose risk limits Control Report
Executive Management Establishes policy Establishes risk limits Establishes risk tolerances Reports to Board Enforces
ESTABLISH THE CONTEXT
C O M M U N I C A T E
IDENTIFY RISKS
What can happen, when, where, how & why
ANALYSE RISKS
& EVALUATE RISKS
& C O N S U L T
M O N I T O R
Treat Risks
YES TREAT
RISKS
NO
R E V I E W
Risk Identification A risk is associated with • A source • An event or incident • A consequence, outcome or impact • A cause (what & why) • Controls and their level of effectiveness and application • When & where could a risk occur.
Identification of Sources of Risk • personnel/human behaviour • management activities and controls • economic circumstances • natural and unnatural events • political circumstances • technology/technical issues • commercial and legal relationships • public/professional/product liability • the activity itself.
Risk Management Methods Comprehensive identification using a wellstructured systematic process is critical, because a risk not identified at this stage may be excluded from further analysis. More Significantly A well-structured process leads to quality collection of AS/NZS 4360:2004. data, as strongly emphasized by AS/NZS4360:2004. HB436:2004 Risk Management Guidelines A Companion to AS/NZS 4360:2004
ESTABLISH THE CONTEXT
C O M M U N I C A T E
IDENTIFY RISKS
ANALYSE RISKS Identify existing controls Determine Determine Likelihood Consequences Determine Level of Risk
&
& C O N S U L T
M O N I T O R
EVALUATE RISKS
Treat Risk
YES TREAT
RISKS
NO
R E V I E W
Risk Analysis
Where possible confidence limits placed on estimates Best available information sources used
• Purpose – Separate minor risks from major – Provide data to assist in evaluation and treatment
• Preliminary Analysis – Excluded Risks where possible possible should should be listed
Examples of Qualitative Analysis Questionnaires • Checklists and Questionnaires • SWOT Analysis • Physical Inspections • Analysis Based on Records of the Operation • Flowcharts • Event trees.
S.W.O.T. ANALYSIS
Resources (Skills & Experience) Impacts
INPUTS
Stakeholders (External/ Internal)
Resources (Financial) Affects
Influences Infl uences
Influences attitudes, approach and process Influences efficiency
Cultural Web Affects
Organisational Environment (Internal/External)
Affects
Power (Authority, Knowledge, Delegations) Af fec fects
Source: HD 240:2000
OUTPUTS
TRANSFORMATION PROCESS
Influences attitudes and approach
Intrinsic/ Extrinsic Rewards Af fects fects
Examples of Quantitative Analysis • Computer Modelling • Fault Tree Analysis • Hazard Indices • Statistical Analysis.
Examples of Likelihood Tables Likelihood Ex. 1
Likelihood Ex. 2
Almost Certain
5
Common
4
Likely
4
Potential
3
Possible
3
2
Unlikely
2
Low Potential Almost Never
Rare
1
1
Likelihood Ex. 3 High Frequency
3
Moderately Frequent
2
Low Frequency
1
It Is up to each organisation to define the parameters that allow users to assess likelihood
Examples of Consequence Tables Consequence Ex. 1
Consequence Ex. 2
Catastrophic
5
Critical
4
Major
4
Severe
3
Moderate
3
Medium
2
Minor
2
Negligible
1
Insignificant
1
Consequence Ex. 3 Significant
3
Moderate
2
Insignificant
1
It Is up to each organisation to define the severity of impact that allow users to assess consequence
Examples of Risk Rating Tables Risk Rating Ex. 1
Risk Rating Ex. 2
Risk Rating Ex. 3
Very High
5
Extreme
4
High
3
High
4
Significant
3
Medium
2
Tolerable
3
Moderate
2
Low
1
Low
2
Low
1
Very Low
1
It Is up to each organisation to define the terminology for risk rating levels, and how this is set in the risk rating matrix.
Example Of A Risk Rating Matrix
AS/NZS4360 – 2004 emphasises that organisations tailor the criteria that drives assessment and analysis to
suit the nature and business environment of their operations.
ESTABLISH THE CONTEXT
C O M M U N I C A T E & C O N S U L T
ANALYSE RISKS
M O N I T O R
EVALUATE RISKS
&
IDENTIFY RISKS
Compare against criteria? Set priorities Treat risks
YES TREAT
RISKS
NO
R E V I E W
Risk Evaluation Consider •
Objectives of project and opportunities
•
Tolerability of risks to others
•
Whether a risk needs treatment
•
Deciding whether risk can be accepted
•
Whether an activity should be undertaken
•
Priorities for treatment
Comparing levels of risk found in analysis with previously established criteria
RISK Risk TOLERABILITY Tolerability SEVERITY/IMPACT/CONSEQUENCES ALMOST CERTAIN
REDUCE LIKELIHOOD
AVOID RISKS
LIKELY D O O H I L E K I L / Y C N E U Q E R F
REDUCE MODERATE
UNLIKELY
RARE
0
ACCEPTABLE OR TOLERABLE LEVEL OF RISK INSIGNIFICANT
REDUCE CONSEQUENCES
MINOR
MAJOR
CRITICAL
EXTREME
Tolerability RISK Risk TOLERABILITY SEVERITY/IMPACT/CONSEQUENCES CERTAIN 1
REDUCE LIKELIHOOD
AVOID RISKS
ALMOST CERTAIN D O O H I L E K I L / Y C N E U Q E R F
REDUCE LIKELY
POSSIBLE
TOLERABLE LEVEL OF RISK UNLIKELY
NOT POSSIBLE 0
$1,000 MILD
$100,000 MODERATE
REDUCE CONSEQUENCES
$1M $100M SEVERE DISASTEROUS
TOTAL
RISK Risk TOLERABILITY Tolerability SEVERITY/IMPACT/CONSEQUENCES CERTAIN 1
REDUCE LIKELIHOOD
AVOID RISKS
ALMOST CERTAIN D O O H I L E K I L / Y C N E U Q E R F
REDUCE LIKELY
POSSIBLE
REDUCE CONSEQUENCES
UNLIKELY
NOT POSSIBLE 0
TOLERABLE LEVEL OF RISK $1,000 MILD
$100,000 MODERATE
$1M SEVERE
$100M DISASTEROUS
TOTAL
Risk magnitude
Intolerable Region L E V E L
Risk cannot be justified except in extraordinary circumstances
Tolerable only if risk
As O Low F As R I Reasonably S K Practicable Broadly acceptable region “de minimus” risk
reduction is impracticable or if its cost is greatly disproportionate to the improvement gained
Tolerable if cost of reduction would exceed the improvements gained Necessary to maintain assurance that the risk remains at this level
ESTABLISH THE CONTEXT
C O M M U N I C A T E
M O N I T O R
IDENTIFY RISKS
ANALYSE RISKS
&
EVALUATE RISKS
& C O N S U L T
Treat risks
NO
YES TREAT
RISKS
Identify options; Assess options; Prepare and Implement treatment options; Analyse & evaluate residual risk
R E V I E W
) E U L A V K S I R ( K S I R F O L E V E L
SATISFACTORY
}
MOST COST EFFECTIVE
}
ACCEPTED PRACTICE
}
BEST ACHIEVABLE ABSOLUTE } MINIMUM
}
COST OF REDUCING RISK ($)
THE TRADE-OFF BETWEEN LEVEL OF RISK AND COST OF REDUCING RISK B.F.Hough 1985
COST OF RISK REDUCTION MEASURES O V E R A L L L E V E L O F R I S K
I M P L E M E N T USE JUDGEMENT
UNECONOMIC
CUMULATIVE COST OF RISK REDUCTION MEASURES
Risk Treatment • reduce – likelihood – consequences
• • • •
business continuity management sharing in full or in part (this creates a new risk) avoid (but not because of aversion) retain residual (but not by default)
REDUCE LIKELIHOOD Risk prevention • compliance compliance programmes • inspection & process controls • security devices, alarms and processes • preventive maintenance • training & education. education.
REDUCE CONSEQUENCES Risk reduction • medical & first aid procedures • off site data & information storage • fraud control planning • fire suppression. suppression.
Business Continuity Management • emergency evacuation plans • off site data & information storage • business contingency plans • business relocation plans • business resumption plans • review, reassess and revise plans.
SHARING RISK Contractual transfer of legal responsibility • sub contracting of hazardous processes • exclusion clauses • outsourcing • partnerships & joint ventures
Insurance
AVOID Reduce probability of loss to zero • cease activity • closure of facility • sell business.
RETAIN RESIDUAL RISKS Losses funded from general operating expenses • vital to record all incidents • ensure retention is not due to failure to identify.
Treatment Options • Consider • • • • • •
Opportunities created by risk Cost of implementation vs benefits Extent of risk reduction vs benefits Criteria of acceptability Rare but severe risks Risk perception and communication.
In general
Costs of managing risk commensurate with benefits Adverse impacts As Low As Reasonably Achievable
Treatment Plans Document how options implemented
Responsibilities
Schedules
Expected outcomes
Budgeting
Performance measures
Review processes
ESTABLISH THE CONTEXT The External Context The Internal Context The Risk Management Context Develop Criteria & Define the Structure
C O M M U N I C A T E & C O N S U L T
IDENTIFY RISKS What can happen, when, where, how & why
ANALYSE RISKS Identify existing controls Determine Determine Likelihood Consequences Determine Level of Risk
M O N I T O R &
EVALUATE RISKS Compare with criteria? Set priorities
Treat Risks
NO
YES TREAT
RISKS
Identify options Assess options Prepare and Implement treatment options
R E V I E W
AS/NZS 4360:2004 Extending The Process • The role of assurance activity, not just as a risk control, but as part of ‘Monitor and Review’ should be developed. • This should go further than just audit. Other interested stakeholders can also benefit from the risk process, such as quality assurance, safety & environment management. The latest update is facilitating linkages between different stakeholders.
MONITOR & REVIEW • RM is a journey not a destination • What may be of minor significance today may be the disaster of tomorrow • Review is an integral part of the risk management process
AS/NZS 4360:2004 Role Of Assurance Activity
Recording the Risk Management Process • demonstrates process conducted properly • provides a record of risks • provides decision makers with plan for approval and implementation • provides accountability tool • facilitates monitoring and review • provides an audit trail • enables sharing and communication communication of information.
Establishing Effective Risk Management • Board & Management commitment • Risk management planning • Culture change • Accountability & authority • Customise to organisational paradigm • Ensure adequate resources • Board monitoring and review of risk management effectiveness
POLICY DEVELOPMENT • NO MORE THAN ONE PAGE • MUST BE SIMPLE, ACHIEVABLE, UNDERSTANDABLE & AUDITABLE • THE RISK MAKERS AND THE RISK TAKERS MUST BE THE RISK MANAGERS • SERVES AS A PLATFORM FOR ORGANISATIONAL GUIDELINES
RISK MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK Risk Management Processes The framework will be implemented by each business unit in accordance with the policy by: • Maintaining Maintaining documented business risk profiles using analytical techniques to identify, evaluate, and manage risks in compliance with AS/NZS 4360:2004 • Communication of risk management issues, where appropriate, to all relevant stakeholders
C O M M U N I C A T E
C O N S U L
1. Strategic Ct
2. Identify Threats
M O N I T O R &
A S S E S S
3. Analyze 4. Assess
5. Assess/
R E V I E W
“The culture, processes culture, processes and structures that are directed towards realising potential opportunities whilst managing adverse effects.”
RISK MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK Risk Management Structure & Responsibility The Board approves the corporate risk management policy policy and framework. The Board Risk Management Committee reviews the effectiveness of the policy.
All managers and staff are accountable for managing risk. The Risk Management “Champion” is responsible for facilitating the risk management program and reporting to the Board Risk Management Committee. “The culture, processes and structures structures that are directed towards realising potential opportunities whilst managing adverse effects.”
“STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT OF RISK” “Managing risk is a way of confidently taking the right risks and then managing the outcomes for success”
Opportunities
Risks
Risk Management and the Strategic Planning Cycle • Future State/ End Vision • SWOT, Opportunities and
Risks • Strategy & Tactics Planning Review & Change
Processes
• Strategic Learning • Strategic Alignment • Strategic
Monitor Performance
Intelligence
• Performance • Capability • External Environment Environment
Execution/ Integration • Manage Tactics • Manage Tasks • Manage Risks
Conduct risk profiling Review performance
Implement and monitor treatment actions
Jan
Sep
Budget and business planning
Strategic planning
May Determine risk treatment actions
The Operational Risk Management Cycle
RISK
MANAGEMENT
BENEFITS
• Fewer surprises • Exploitation of opportunities • Improved planning, performance and effectiveness • Economy and efficiency • Improved stakeholder relationships • Improved information for decision making • Enhanced reputation • Director protection • Accountability, assurance and governance • Personal wellbeing.
RISK MANAGEMENT OUTCOMES RM leads to more informed decision making business continuity planning minimising disruptions better utilisation of resources strengthening of the culture of continuous improvement • best practice • a quality organisation • • • • •
YOU DO NOT HAVE TO DO IT!! SURVIVAL IS NOT
COMPULSORY
The greatest risk of all is to take no risk at all!
The Journey Continues A journey ……….
A race
In pursuit of performance
Building Value
AS/NZS 4360:2004 and its accompanying Handbook provide generic guidance on how to embed risk managemen management, t, and introduces the concept of “positive” risk to help you on the way. C O M M U N I C A T E
C O N S U L T
Structure Direction
1. Strategic Ct
2. IdentifyThreats
A S S E S S
3. Analyze 4. Assess 5. Assess/
7. Manage the Risk
Processes
M O N I T O R & R E V I E W
Opportunities
Risks
