Arb231.14-Written Statement

August 19, 2022 | Author: Anonymous | Category: N/A
Share Embed Donate


Short Description

Download Arb231.14-Written Statement...

Description

 

B E F O R E T H E D E P U T Y R E G I S T R A R A T WA R N A G A L  A . R . B . C a s e N o .

231

of 2014.

Between:M / s . S h ri r i r a m C h it i t s P v t . L t d. d . , W ar a r a n ga g a l - II I I B r a nc nc h rep. by its Branch Manager-cum-Foremen …  A n d Ch. Mohan Rao and others



Disputant

Opponents

WR I T T E N S T AT AT E M E N T F I L E D B Y T H E O P P O N E N T N o . 1

 A l l t h e a l l e g a t i o n s , c l a i m s m e n t i o n e d i n t h e p e t i t i o n f i l e d b y t h e d iis s pu p u tta a nt nt

a rre e

f al al s se e,

b as a s el e l es es s s,,

h en en c ce e

s pe p e ci c i fi f i ca c a ll ll y

d en e n ie ie d

by

t hi hi s

opponent. The disputant is put to strict legal proof of the same. 1 ) T he h e p ar a r a s N o .1 . 1 a nd n d 2 o f t h e p et e t i ti t i on o n a r e p e rt rt a aii n ns s t o d e s cr c r i pt p t i ve ve particulars of parties to the case, hence need no specific reply. 2 ) I n r e p ly l y t o p a ra r a N o . 3 o f t h e p e t i ti t i o n, n , t h i s o p p o ne n e n t i s u n a w ar ar e t h a t t h e d i s pu p u t an a n t c o m pa p a n y i s d o in i n g c o ns n s u m er e r f i n an a n c e a n d c o ns n s u me me r   a r ti t i c l es e s f i n an a n c e b u si s i n es e s s a n d p r ov o v i d in i n g l o an a n s t o t h e c o ns n s u me me r s . Rest of the contents are specifically denied. The disputant failed to file any documentary proof of evidence in support of its contention. 3 ) I n r e pl p l y t o p ar a r a N o ..4 4 & 5 o f t h e p e ti t i t io i o n a r e f a ls l s e, e , i n c or o r r ec ec t a n d specifically denied and the disputant company is hereby called upon t o p ro r o ve ve

the sa am m e w it i t h s t ri ri c ctt

d oc o c um u m en e n t ar a r y p r oo o o f t h er er e eo o f . T hi hi s

opponent submits that it is false and incorrect that this opponent  j o i n e d a s m e m b e r i n t h e c h i t g r o u p N o . 4 / W S L C - 1 6 / 2 0 1 2 f o r c h i t v a l u e o f R s . 5 , 0 0 , 0 0 0 / - f o r s u b s c r i p t i o n o f R s . 1 0 , 0 0 0 / - p e r mo n t h f o r   a p e r i od o d o f 5 0 m o n th t h s . T h e o p po p o n en e n t h a s p a r t i ci c i p at at e d i n t h e c h i t a u ct c t i o n c o nd n d u ct c t e d o n 2 8 -0 -0 4 - 2 21 1 2 a n d h e d e cl c l a r ed e d a s s u cc c c e s sf sf u l b iid d de d e r i n t h e a u c ti t i on o n a nd nd h a av v i ng n g a gr g r e ed ed t o f o orr g o a n a mo m o un un t o f   R s . 2, 2 , 0 0, 0 , 0 00 0 0 / - o u t o f Rs R s . 5, 5 , 0 0 ,0 , 0 0 0/ 0/ - .

W h en e n th th i s o p p po o n en e n t n e ve ve r  

 j o i n e d t h e a l l e g e d c h i t t h e q u e s t i o n o f o p p o n e n t s N o . 2 t o 5 s t o o d a s g u a r a n t o r s t o h i m, d o e s n o t a r i s e . T h e a l l e g e d d oc oc u m e n t s r e l i e d b y the disputant company is rank forged, created and invented by the d iis s pu p u tta a nt nt

c om o m pa p a ny ny

i n o rrd d er er

t o f il i l e t he he

a bo b o ve ve

c as a s e, e,

t o e nr n r ic ic h

wrongful gain. 4 ) I n r e pl p l y t o p ar a r a N o ..6 6 & 7 o f t h e p e ti t i t io i o n a r e f a ls l s e, e , i n c or o r r ec ec t a n d specifically denied and the disputant company is hereby called upon t o p rro o ve v e t he h e s am a m e w iitt h s ttrr ic i c t d oc o c um u m en e n tta a rry y p rro o of o f t he h e rre e of of . A s …contd

 

P-2 .

submitted supra, when this opponent never joined the alleged chit the question of alleged due to the disputant company the opponents d o e s n ot ot a r i s e .

T h e c o nt n t e n t i o n of o f t h e d i s pu p u t a n t c om o m p a n y i s c le le a r  

that only with an intention to harass the opponents, the disputant company filed the above case without any basis . 5 ) I n r ep e p ly l y t o p a ra r a N o. o. 8 o f t h he e p et e t it i t io i o n a re re f a all se s e , i nc n c or o r rre e ct c t a nd nd specifically denied and the disputant company is hereby called upon t o p r o ve v e t h e s a me m e w it i t h s t r ic i c t d o c um u m en e n t ar a r y p r o of of t h he e re r e of of . o pp p p on o n en e n t n ev ev e err r e ce c e iv iv e ed d c om o m pa p a ny n y. d iis s pu p u tta a nt nt c la l a iim m in in g

T he he

r es es t

c om o m pa p a ny ny t he he

th he e a l le l e ge g e d n ot o t i ce c e f r om o m t h e d is i s pu p u t an an t

a ll l l eg e g at a t iio o ns ns

a rre e

c rre e at a t ed ed ,

t o g ai a i n s ym y m pa p a tth h y o f t he he

a ll l l eg e g ed ed

T hi hi s

a mo mo u un n tt..

T he he

a ll l l eg e g ed ed

i nv n v en e n tte ed H on o n ’b ’ b le le

by

C ou o u rrtt

c al a l cu c u la l a ttii on on

of

t he he f or or   t he he

c la la i m ma a nt nt c o om m pa p a ny n y i s i n co c o r re r e ct c t a nd n d i n o rd r d er e r t o s qu q u ee e e ze z e e xc x c es es s a mo u n t , f i l e d t h e p r e s e n t p e t i t i o n a g a i n s t t h e s e o p p o n e n t . 6) In re ep p lly y t o t he h e c on o n tte e nt n t s o f o tth h er e r p ar ar a as s a rre e f al a l se s e , i nc n c or o r rre e ct c t a nd nd created by the claimant company for the purpose of filing a false p e t i t i o n a n d t h e s e o p p o n e n t s a r e n o t a t l i a b l e t o p a y a n y a mo u n t s t o t h e c l a i m an a n t c o m p a n y. y.

The amou un n t m e n t i o ne n e d i n t h e s t a t em em e n t o f  

account and also petition, the alleged penal charges and cheque return charges are excessive and exorbitant and against the law, though this opponent is not liable to pay t he same. 7 ) T he h e re r e a r e n o m e r it it s i n t h he e p et e t i ti ti o on n a nd nd t h he e sa am m e i s d es e s er e r v es es n o consideration.

It is therefore prayed that the Hon’ble Court may be pleased to d i s m i s s t h e a b o v e c a s e a g a i ns n s t t h i s o p p o ne n e n t w i t h e x e m p la la r y c o s t s , i n the interest of justice.

OPPONENT No.1 V E R I F I C AT AT I O N : - I , t h e a b o v e n a m e d o p p o n e n t N o . 1 , d o h e r e b y d e c l a r e t h a t t h e c o n t e n t s o f t h e a b o v e c o u nt nt e r a r e t r u e a n d c o r r e c t t o t h e b e s t of my knowledge and belief, hence verified and signed on this

day of 

October, 2014 at Hanumakonda.

OPPONENT No.1  A D V O C AT E F O R T H E O P P O N E N T N o . 1 .

View more...

Comments

Copyright ©2017 KUPDF Inc.
SUPPORT KUPDF