Antenna Theory Andrew

March 28, 2023 | Author: Anonymous | Category: N/A
Share Embed Donate


Short Description

Download Antenna Theory Andrew...

Description

 

Antenna Theory Basic Principles For Daily Applications

Ba se Sta tati tio o n Ante A ntenna nna Systems ystems M a rc h 20 2009

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

1

 

Base Statio ion nA Ant ntenn nna a Tec hno hnolo log gy Evolut volution ion  An tenna  Anten na Core Technology Omni Vertical Directional Polarization

 Air   Ai r  Interfaces

Dominate Application

DualPol® MIMO

DualPol® Dual Band Capacity Improvement RET with Frequency Interference Reduction MIMO MIMO

Significant Application

Digital Beam Former  SDMA Capacity

SmartBeam® Capacity” Load Balance MIMO

Low Application

 AMPS GSM CDMA W-CDMA WiMAX TD-SCDMA LTE

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

2

 

Dipole F0 (MHz)

¼ λ

F0

¼ λ

λ

(Meters)

λ

(Inches)

30

10.0

393.6

80

3.75

147.6

160

1.87

73.8

280

1.07

42.2

460 800

0.65 0.38

25.7 14.8

960

0.31

12.3

1700

0.18

6.95

2000

0.15

5.9

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

3

 

3D View Antenna Pattern

Source: COMSEARCH PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

4

 

Understanding The Mysterious “dB” dBd

Signal strength relative to a dipole in empty space

dBi

Signal strength relative to an isotropic radiator 

dB

Difference between two signal strengths

dBm

 Absolute signal strength relative to 1 milliw milliwatt att 1m WW attatt = 30 dBm 20 Watts = 43 dBm

dBc

Note: The Scale Logarithmic 10 * log10 (Power Ratio)

Signal strength relative to a signal of known strength, s trength, in this case: the carrier signal Example: Exampl e: – –150 150 dBc = 15 150 0 dB bel below ow c carr arrier ier sig signal nal If two carriers are 20 Watt each = 43 dBm  –150 dBc = –107 dBm or ~0.02 pWatt or ~1 microvolt

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

5

 

Effec t Of VSWR Good VSWR is only one component of an efficient antenna. Power  Power  Reflected (%) Trans. (%)

VSWR

Return Loss (dB)

Transmission Loss (dB)

1.00



0.00

0.0

100.0

1.10

26.4

0.01

0.2

99.8

1.20

20.8

0.04

0.8

99.2

1.30

17.7

0.08

1.7

98.3

1.40

15.6

0.12

2.8

97.2

1.50

14.0

0.18

4.0

96.0

2.00

9.5

0.51

11.1

88.9

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

6

 

Shaping Antenna Patterns

Vertical arrangement of properly phased dipoles allows control of radiation patterns at the horizon as well as above and below the horizon. The more dipoles that are stacked vertically, the flatter the vertical pattern is and the higherr the anten highe antenna na cove coverage rage or ‘ga ‘gain’ in’ is in the gen general eral direction of the horizon.

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

7

 

ontiinu nued ed ) Shaping Antenna Patterns (C ont  Aperture of Dipoles

Vertical Pattern

Horizontal Pattern

• Stacking 4 dipoles vertically in line changes the pattern shape (squashes the doughnut) and increases the gain over single dipole.

Single Dipole

• The peak of the horizontal or vertical pattern measures the

• 4 Dipoles Vertically Stacked

gain. The little lobes, illustrated in the lower section, are secondary minor lobes.

General neral Stacking Rule • Ge

• Collinear elements (in-line vertically). • Optimum spacing (for non-electrical tilt) is approximately 0.9λ. • Doubling the number of elements increases gain by 3 dB, and reduces vertical beamwidth by half. PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

8

 

Gain What is it?  Antenna gain is a comparison comparison of the power/field characteristics characteristics of a device under te test st (DUT) to a specified gain standard.

Why is it useful? Gain can be associated with wi th coverage distance and/or obstacle penetration (buildings, foliage, etc).

How is it measured? It is measured using data collected from antenna range testing. The reference gain standard must always be specified.

What is Andrew standard?  Andrew conforms to the industry standard of +/–1 dB accuracy.

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

9

 

Gain Reference nces (dB (dBd A And nd dBi) dBi) •  An isotropic antenna is is a single point in space radiating in a perfect sphere (not physically possible).

Isotropic Pattern Dipole Pattern

Isotropic (dBi) Dipole (dBd) Gain dBi dBd

•  A dipole antenna is one radiating element (physically possible). two •  A gain antenna is two or more radiating elements phased together.

3 (dBd) = 5.14 (dBi) 0 (dBd) = 2.14 (dBi)

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

10

 

Princ inc iple iples s Of Antenna nna Gain Omni Antenna, Side View

Dir ire ec tiona ionall Ante Antenna nnas s, Top Vie View w

-3 dB

0 dBd

0 dBd

60° -3 dB

+3 dBd +3 dBd

30°

180° -3 dB

-3 dB

+6 dBd

+6 dBd

15°

90°

-3 dB -3 dB

7.5°

+9 dBd

+9 dBd

45°

-3 dB -3 dB

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

11

 

Theor heoretica ical Ga Gain Of Antenna nnas (dB (dBd) 3 dB Horizontal Aperture (Influenced (I nfluenced by Grounded Back Back “ Pla Plate” te” ) 360°    )    9  .    0    (   s   r   d   o  e    t   a  c    i    d   a   p   a    S    R   y    f   l    l   o   a    #   c    i    t   r   e    V

180° 120° 105°

Typical Length of Antenna (ft.)

90°

60°

45°

33°

800/900 PCSMHz

DCS Vertical 1800/1900 Beamwidth

1

0

3

4

5

6

8

9

10.5

1

0.5

60°

2

3

6

7

8

9

11

12

13.6

2

1

30°

3 4

4.5 6

7.5 9

8.5 10

9.5 11

10.5 12.5 13.5 12 14 15

15.1 16.6

3 4

1.5 2

20° 15°

6

7.5

10.5

11.5

12.5

13.5 15.5 16.5

18.1

6

3

10°

8

9

12

13

14

19.6

8

4

7.5°

15

17

18

Could be horizontal radiator pairs for narrow horizontal apertures.

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

12

 

Antenna Gain



Gain (dBi) (dBi) = Di Directiv rectivity ity (dBi) (dBi) – Losse Losses s (dB)



Losses:

Conductor   Dielectric Impedance Polarization



Measure using ‘Gain by Comparison’

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

13

 

Antenna Polarization



Vertical polarization  – Traditional land mobile use  – Omni antennas  – Requires spatial separation for div diversity ersity  – Still recommended in rural, low m multipath ultipath environments



Polarization diversity  – Slant 45° (+ and –) is now popular   – Requires only a single antenna for div diversity ersity  – Lower zoning impact  – Best performance in high and m medium edium multipath environments Measured data will be presented in the Systems Section PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

14

 

Various Radiator Designs Elements

Dipole

1800/1900/UMTS Directed Dipole™

DualPol ®  (XPol) Directed Dipole™

Patch

800/900 MHz Directed Dipole™

MAR Microstrip Annular Ring

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

15

 

Dipoles

Single Dipole

Crossed Dipole

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

16

 

Feed Harne nes ss C Co onst nstruct uction ion

ASP705

ASP705K 

LBXX-6513DS 6513DS

C enter Feed

C or orpo por rate

(Hybrid)

Feed

(Old Style)

Series Feed

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

17

 

ontiinu nued ed ) Feed Ha Harne nes ss C onst nstruct uc tion ion (C ont Center Feed (Hybrid)

Series Feed

Advantages

• Minimum feed losses • Simple feed system

Corporate Feed

• Frequency independent main lobe direction

• Frequency independent main beam direction

• Reasonably simple • More beam shaping feed system ability, sidelobe suppression

Disadvantages

• Not as versatile as

BEAMTILT

+2°

corporate (less bandwidth, less

+1° 0° +1°

ASP-705

+2° 450

455

460

465

470 MHz

• Complex feed system

beam shaping)

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

18

 

Feed Networks



Coaxial cable  – Best isolation  – Constant impedance  – Constant phase



Microstripline, corporate feeds  – Dielectric substrate  – Air substrate

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

19

 

Micr Mic rostrip Feed Lines ines



Dielectric substrate  – Uses printed circuit technology  – Power limitation limitations s  – Dielectric substrate causes loss (~1.0 dB dB/m /m at 2 GHz)

•  Air substrate  – Metal strip spaced above a g groundplane roundplane  – Minimal solder or welded joints  – Laser cut or punched  – Air substrate cause minimal loss (~0.1 dB/m at 2 GHz)

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

20

 

Air Micr Mic rostrip Ne Nettwo wor rk 

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

21

 

LBX-3 X-3316-VTM Us Using Hybr ybrid C able/ le/ Air Strip ipline line

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

22

 

LBX-3 X-3319-VTM Us Using Hybr ybrid C able/ le/ Air Strip ipline line

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

23

 

DB812 Omni Antenna Vertical Pattern

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

24

 

932DG 93 2DG65T 65T2E2E-M Pattern Simulation

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

25

 

Key A Ant ntenna nna Pattern Objec jec tives ives For sector antenna, the key pattern objective is to focus as much energy as possible into a desired sector with a desired radius while minimizing unwanted interference to/from all other sectors. This requires:

• •

Optimized pattern shaping

••

Pattern consistency for polarization diversity models Downtilt consistency

Pattern consistency over the rated frequency band

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

26

 

Main Lobe What is it? The main lobe is the radiation pattern lobe that contains the majority portion of

3 ota a 35 5°° T Tot ota ot all Main Main Lobe Lobe

radiated energy.

Why is it useful? Shaping of the pattern allows the contained coverage necessary for interference-limited system designs.

How is it measured? The main lobe is characterized using a number of the measurements which will follow.

What is Andrew standard?  Andrew conforms to the industry standard. standard.

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

27

 

Half-Power Beamwidth Horizontal And Vertical What is it? The angular span between the half-power

1/2 1/2 Power  Power  Beamwidth Beamwidth

(-3 dB) points measured on the cut of the antenna’s main lobe radiation pattern.

Why is it useful? It allows system designers to choose the optimum characteristics for coverage vs. interference requirements.

How is it measured? It is measured using data collected from antenna range testing.

What is Andrew standard?  Andrew conforms to the industry standard. standard.

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

28

 

Frontnt-To-Bac k Ratio What is it? The ratio in dB of the maximum directivity of an antenna to its directivity in a specified rearward direction. Note that on a dual-polarized antenna, it is the sum of co-pol and cross-pol patterns.

Why is it useful? It characterizes unwanted interference on larger the backside of the main lobe. The the number, the better!

How is it measured? It is measured using data collected from antenna range testing.

What is Andrew standard?

F/B F/B Ratio Ratio @ @ 180 180 degrees degrees 00 dB d d d dB dB B –– 25 25 dB dB dB B == 25 25 dB 25 dB dB B

Each data sheet shows specific performance. In general, traditional dipole and patch elements will yield 23–28 dB while the Directed Dipole™ Dipole™ style elements will yield 35–40 35–40 dB. PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

29

 

Sidelobe Level What is it? Sidelobe level is a measure of a particular sidelobe or angular group of sidelobes with respect to the main lobe.

Why is it useful?

Sidelobe Sidelobe Level Level (–20 (–20 dB) dB)

Sidelobe level or pattern shaping allows the minor lobe energy to be tailoreduse. to the antenna’s intended See Null Fill and Upper Sidelobe Suppression.

How is it measured? It is always measured with respect to the main lobe in dB.

What is Andrew standard?  Andrew conforms to the industry standard. standard. PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

30

 

Null Filling What is it? Null filling is an array optimization technique that reduces the null between the lower lobes in the elevation plane.

Why is it useful? For arrays with a narrow vertical beamwidth (less than 12°), null filling significantly improves signal intensity in all coverage targets below the horizon.

How is it measured? Null fill is easiest explained as the relative dB difference between the peak of the main beam and the depth of the 1st lower null.

What is Andrew standard? Most Andrew arrays will have null fill of 20–30 dB without optimization. To qualify as null fill, we expect expect no less than 15 and and typically 10–12 dB! PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

31

 

Null Filling Important For Antennas With Narrow Elevation Beamwidths

Null Filled to 16 dB Below Peak    )   m    B

0

   l    d    (   -20   e   v -40   e    L    d -60   e   v    i   e -80   c    R   e-100

Transmit Power = 1 W Base Station Antenna Height = 40 m Base Station Antenna Gain = 16 dBd Elevation Beamwidth = 6.5°

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

Distance (km)

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

32

 

Upper Sidelobe Suppression What is it?

First Upper  Sidelobe Suppression

Upper sidelobe suppression (USLS) is an array optimization technique that reduces the undesirable sidelobes above the main lobe.

Why is it useful? For arrays with a narrow vertical beamwidth (less than 12°), USLS can significantly reduce interference due to multi-path or when the antenna is mechanically downtilted.

How is it measured? USLS is the relative dB difference between the peak of the main beam peak of the first upper sidelobe.

What is Andrew standard? Most of Andrew’s arrays will have USLS of >15 dB without optimization. optimization. The goal of all new designs is to suppress the first upper upper sidelobe to unity gain or lower. PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

33

 

Orthogonality δ

What is it? The ability of an antenna to discriminate between two waves whose polarization difference is 90 degrees.

Why is it useful? Orthogonal arrays within a single antenna allow for polarization diversity. (As opposed to spacial diversity.)

How is it measured? The difference between the co-polar pattern and the cross-polar pattern, usually measured in the boresite (the direction of the main signal).

What is Andrew standard?  Andrew conforms to the industry standard. standard.

Decorrelation between the Green and Blue Lines –∞ dB δ = 0°, XPol = δ δ

= 5°, XPol = –21 dB =10°, XPol = –15 dB δ = 15°, XPol = –11 dB δ = 20°, XPol = –9 dB δ = 45°, XPol = –3 dB δ =5 =50 0°, XPol = –2.3 dB δ = 60°, XPol = –1.2 dB =70°, °, XPo XPoll = –0.54 –0.54 dB δ =70 δ =80 =80°, °, XPo XPoll = –0.13 –0.13 dB δ =90°, XPol = 0 dB XPol = 20 log ( sin (δ ) PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

34

 

C ross-Pol Ra Ratio (CP (C PR) What is it? CPR is a comparison of the co-pol vs. cross-pol pattern performance of a dual-polarized antenna generally over the sector of interest

120° 0 -5 -10 -15 -20 -25

(alternatively over the 3 dB beamwidth).

Why is it useful?

-30 -35

It is a measure of the ability of a cross-pol array to distinguish between orthogonal waves. The better the CPR, the better the performance of polarization diversity.

How is it measured?

Typical

-40

Co-Polarization Cross-Polarization

120°

(Source @ 90°)

0

It is measured using data collected from antenna range testing and compares the two plots in dB over the specified angular range. Note: in the

-5

-10

-15

-20

-25

rear hemisphere, cross-pol becomes co-pol and vice versa.

-30

-35

-40

Directed Dipole™

What is Andrew standard? For traditional dipoles, the minimum is 10 dB; however, for the Directed Dipole™ style elements, it increases to 15 dB min. PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

35

 

Horizonta izontal B Be eam Trac king What is it? It refers to the beam tracking between the two beams of a +/–45° +/–45° polarizati polarization on diversity diversity

120° 120°

antenna over a specified angular range.

Why is it useful? For optimum diversity performance, the beams should track as closely as possible.

 –45° Array

+45° Array

How is it measured? It is measured using data collected from antenna range testing and compares the two plots in dB over the specified angular range.

What is Andrew standard? The Andrew beam tracking standard is +/–1 dB over the 3 dB horizontal beamwidth.

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

36

 

Beam Squint Horizontal Boresite

What is it? The amount of pointing error of a given beam referenced to mechanical boresite.

Squint Squint

θ/2 θ

Why is it useful? The beam squint can affect the sector coverage if it is not at mechanical boresite. It can also affect the performance of the polarization diversity style antennas if the two arrays do not have similar patterns.

 

 –3 dB

+3 dB

How is it measured? It is measured using data collected from antenna range testing.

What is Andrew standard? For the horizontal beam, squint shall be less than 10% of the 3 dB beamwidth. For the vertical beam, squint shall be less than 15% of the 3 dB beamwidth or 1 degree, whichever is greatest. PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

37

 

Sec tor Power wer Ratio (SPR) 120° 120° What is it? SPR is a ratio expressed in percentage of the power outside the desired sector  to the power inside the desired sector created by an antenna’s pattern.

Why is it useful? It is a percentage that allows comparison of various antennas. The better the SPR, the better the interference performance of the system.

How is it measured? Desired

It is mathematically derived from the measured range data.

Σ

What is Andrew standard?  Andrew Directed Dipole™ style antennas have SPR’s typically less than 2 percent.

Undesired

300

SPR (%) =

60

PUndesired X 100

60

Σ 300

PDesired PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

38

 

Antenna–Based System Improvements Key Antenna Parameters To Examine Closely 932LG Directed Dipole™

Standard Stan dard 85° 85° Panel Panel Antenna Antenna  –7 dB

Roll off 

 –6 dB

at -/+ 60° 74° 74°

 –16 dB

-10 dB points Horizontal  Ant/Ant Isolation

83° 83°

 –12 dB

Next Sector   Ant/Ant  –35 dB Isolation  –18 dB

120° Cone of Great Silence with >40 dB Front-to-Back Ratio

Cone of Silence

60° Area of Poor Silence with >27 dB Front-to-Back Ratio PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

39

 

Key A Ant ntenna nna Pattern Obj bje ec tives ives   n

  b a   n   r  b    b  b a   b  u   r a  l   u   U  r   S   R  u

Azimuth Beam



Beam tracking vs. frequency

1

1

1

Squint

1

1

1

Roll-off past the 3 dB points

1

2

3

Front-to-back ratio

1

1

2

Cross-pol beam tracking

1

1

1

• Beam tracking vs. frequency

1

2

3

Ratings:

• Upper sidelobe suppression • Lower null fill • Cross-pol beam tracking

1 3

2 3

3 2

1 = Always important 2 = Sometimes important

2

2

3

3 = Seldom important

Limited to sub-bands on broadband models

• • • •

Elevation Beam

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

40

 

ontiinu nued ed ) Key A Ant ntenna nna Pattern O Ob bje jec c tives ives (C ont   n    b  b a   U  r

Downtilt



  n   b a   u  r  b   b   r a  l   S  u   R  u

Electrical vs. mechanical tilt

1

1

3

•  Absolute tilt • Electrical tilt vs. frequency • Effective gain on the horizon

2

2

3

1

2

3

1

2

3

2

1

1

Gain • Close to the theoretical value (directivity minus losses)

Note: Pattern shaping reduces gain.

Ratings: 1 = Always important 2 = Sometimes important 3 = Seldom important

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

41

 

Advanced Antenna Technology  Adaptive Array (AA)

• • • • •

Planar array



External digital signal processing (DSP) controls the antenna pattern

4, 6, and 8 column vertical pol designs for WiMAX and TD-SCDMA*



Often calibration ports are used

 A unique beam tracks each each mobile  Adaptive nulling of of interfering signals Increased signal to interference ratio performance benefits

* Time Division Spatial Code Division Multiple Access

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

42

 

Advanced Antenna Technology MIMO Systems

2 x 2 MIMO Spatial Multiplexing

Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO)

•  A DualPol® RET for 2x2 MIMO,



External DSP extracts signal from



Spatial multiplexing works best in



interference Capacity gains due to multiple antennas



a multi-path environment Space Time Block Coding is a diversity MIMO mode



two separated for 4x4 MIMO

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

43

 

Advanced Antenna Technology SmartBeam® Antenna Family • Most flexible and efficient antenna system in the industry • Solution for the traffic peaks instead of raising the bar everywhere • Full 3-way remote optimization options - RET – Remote Remote El Electri ectrical cal Tilt Tilt (e.g. 0–10°) - RAS – Rem Remote ote Az Azimu imuth th Stee Steering ring (+ (+/– /– 30°) 0°) - RAB – Remote Azimuth Beamwidth (from m 35° 35° to 105 105°) °) Beamwidth (fro

• Redirect and widen the beam based on traffic requirements • Balance the traffic per area with the capacity per sector  • Best utilization of radio capacity per sector  • Convenient and low-cost optimization from a remote office • Quick and immediate execution • Scheduled and executed several times a day (e.g. business and residential plan)

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

44

 

Advanced Antenna Technology SmartBeam ®  3-Way Model  Azimuth 35°

patterns measured at 1710–2180 MHz with no radome.

65°

90°

105°

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

45

 

Advanced Antenna Technology SmartBeam ®  3-Way Model Elevation 35°

patterns measured at 1710–2180 MHz with no radome.

65°

105° 90°

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

46

 

System Issues • Choosing sector antennas • Narrow beam antenna applications • Polarization—vertical vs. slant 45° • Downtilt—electrical vs. mechanical • RET optimization • Passive intermodulation (PIM) • Return loss through coax •  Antenna isolation • Pattern distortion

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

47

 

C hoo hoos sing ing Sec tor Antenna nnas For 3 sector cell sites, what performance differences can be expected from the use of antennas with different horizontal apertures? Criteria

•  Area of service indifference between between adjacent sectors (ping-pong area)

• For comparison, use 6 dB differentials •  Antenna gain and overall sector coverage coverage comparisons

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

48

 

3x 1 12 20° Antenna nnas 120° Horiz Horizontal ontal Overl Overlay ay Patte Pattern rn 0 -5 -10

Examples

-15

VPol

-20 -25

Low Band

-30

DB874H120 DB878H120

-35

49°

-40

3 dB PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

49

 

3x 9 90 0° Antennas 90° Horiz Horizontal ontal Overl Overlay ay Patte Pattern rn 0

Examples

-5 -10

XPol

VPol

-15

Low Band

-20 -25 -30

44°

-35 -40

DB854DG90 DB856DG90

DB842H90 DB844H90

DB BX 8-5980D1G L 2 90 LBX-9013

DB BV 8-4980H1920 L

High Band

5 dB

D B932DG90 DB950G85 HBX-9016 UMWD-09014B UMWD-09016

UMW-9015

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

50

 

3x 6 65 5° Antennas Examples

65° Horiz Horizontal ontal Overl Overlay ay Patte Pattern rn

XPol

VPol

0

Low Band

-5 -10

CTSDG-06513 CTSDG-06515 CTSDG-06516 DB854DG65 DB856DG65 DB858DG65 LBX-6513 LBX-6516

-15 -20 -25 -30 -35

19°

-40

DB844H65 DB848H65 LBV-6513

High Band

10 dB

UMWD-06513 UMWD-06516 UMWD-06517 HBX-6516 HBX-6517

PCS-06509 HBV-6516 HBV-6517

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

51

 

Spe pec c ial ial Na Narrow B Be eam Ap Applic plica ations

4-Sector Site (45°)

Road

°

6-Sector Site (33 )

Repeater  Narrow Donor, Wide Coverage  Antennas Rural Roadway PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

52

 

Test Drive Route

H    A R  R Y    H   I  N   E   S 

35

183

S  T    E    M    M    O   N    S   F    R  W    Y   

 A I R R P    O R  T    F   R W         W Y        O .       R

      L       A      G       E       R

   E    N   A    L      R   D    I    B   G    I   N    K   C   O    M

CELL SITE

   D   A   O    R    D    O  O    N   W    I

   T    E    E    R    T   S    R    O    T   O    M

 N 

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

53

 

Polarization Diversity Tests

DB854HV90

DB854DD90

1 DRIVE TESTS

.

Test A

Test B

+45°/-45° (Slant 45°)

2 0°/90° (H/V)

A

HANDHELD

1A

2A

B

MOBILE

1B

2B

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

54

 

Slant Sla nt 45° 45° / HandHand-Hel Held d In Car  Space Diversity vs. Slanted +45°/–45° -40

Test Set-Up and Uplink Signal Strength Measurements DB833

DB854DD90

A

E

Red

-50

DB833 B

Green

9dB

   )   m    B    d    (    h    t   g   n   e   r    t    S    l   a   n   g    i    S

TEST 1A

9dB

Black

Blue

11dB 7.5 ft.

-60

-70

-80 moving away from tower 

moving towards tower 

-90 moving crossface

-100 Uplink Signal Strength

Vert Left

Vert Right

Slant Div

Slant Div

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

55

 

Slant Sla nt 45° 45° / HandHand-He Held ld In Car  Space Diversity vs. Slanted +45°/–45°

TEST 1A

Difference Between Strongest Uplink Signals 16

   )    B    d    (    h    t   g   n   e    t   r    S    l   a   n   g    i    S

12 8

4

Slant ±45° Improvement

0 -4 -8 Difference Between Polarization Diversity and Space Diversity Average Difference

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

56

 

Slant 45° / Mobile Mobile With Glas Glass s Mount Mount Space Diversity vs. Slanted +45°/-45° -40

Test Set-Up and Uplink Signal Strength Measurements DB833

DB854DD90

A

E

Black

Red

DB833 B

Green

9dB

   ) -50   m    B    d    (    h    t -60   g   n   e   r    t    S -70    l   a   n   g    i    S

TEST 1B

9dB Blue

11dB 7.5 ft.

moving away from tower 

moving towards tower 

-80

moving crossface -90

Uplink Signal Strength

Vert Left

Vert Right

Slant Div

Slant Div PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

57

 

Slant 45° / Mobile Mobile With Glas Glass s Mount Mount Space Diversity vs. Slanted +45°/-45°

TEST 1B

Difference Between Strongest Uplink Signals 16

   ) 12    B    d    (    h    t 8   g   n   e    t   r 4    S    l   a 0   n   g    i    S -4

Slant ±45° Degradation

-8

Difference Between Polarization Diversity and Space Diversity Average Difference

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

58

 

Rysavy Research

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

59

 

Fut utur ure e Tec hnolog hnology Foc us • Figure 16 shows that HSDPA,1xEV-DO, and 802.16e are all within 2-3 dB of the Shannon indicating that from bound, a link layer perspective, there is not much room for improvement.

• This figure demonstrates that the focus of future technology enhancements should be on improving system performance aspects that improve and maximize the experienced SNRs in the system instead of investigating new air interfaces that attempt to improve the link layer performance.

1

Peter Rysavy of Rysavy Research, “Data Capabilities: GPRS to HSDPA and Beyond”, 3G Americas, September 2005

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

60

 

The Im Impa pac ct Lower Co-Channel Interference/Better Capacity And Quality In a three sector site, traditional antennas produce a high degree of imperfect power control or sector overlap. Imperfect sectorization presents opportunities for:

• •

Increased softer hand-offs Interfering signals

• •

Dropped calls Reduced capacity

The rapid roll-off of the lower lobes of the  Andrew Directed Dipole™ antennas create

Traditio nal Flat Panels Panels

65°

90°

 A  An n d r ew Dir Di r ec ectt ed Dip Di p o l e™

65°

90°

larger, defined ‘cones of silence’ behind better the array.

• • •

Much smaller softer hand-off area Dramatic call quality improvement 5%–10% capacity enhancement PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

61

 

120° Sec tor Ove ver rla lay y Iss Issues On the Capacity and Outage Probability of a CDMA Heirarchial Mobile System with Perfect/Imperfect Power Control and Sectorization By: Jie ZHOU et, et, al IEICE TRANS FUNDAMENTALS, FUNDAMENTALS, VOL.E82-A, NO.7 JULY 199 1999 9 . . . From the numerical results, the user capacities are dramatically decreased as the imperfect power control increases and the overlap between the sectors (imperfect sectorization) increases . . . Effect of Soft and Softer Handoffs H andoffs on CDMA System Capacity By: Chin-Chun Chin-Chun Lee et, al IEEE TRANSACTIONS TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 47, NO. 3,  AUGUST 1998

15

   f   o  s   e   s   o10   g   l   a   y    t   t   n   i   e   c 5   a   c   r   p   e   a    P  c

0

0 5 angle 10in degree 15 Overlapping

Qualitatively, excessive excessive overlay also reduces capacity of TDMA and GSM systems. systems.

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

62

 

Hard, Soft, and Softer Handoffs • Hard Handoff  -

Used in time division multiplex systems

-

Switches from one frequency to another  Often results in a ping-pong switching effect

• Soft Handoff  -

Used in code division multiplex systems

-

Incorporates a rake receiver to combine signals from multiple cells Smoother communication without the clicks typical in hard handoffs

• Softer Handoff  -

Similar to soft handoff except combines signals from multiple adjacent sectors

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

63

 

Soft and Softer Handoff Examples Softer Handoff 

Two-Way Soft Handoff 

Three-Way Soft Handoff 

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL

64

© Comm CommScope Scope

 

Beam Downtilt In urban areas, servi service ce and frequency utilization utilization are frequently improved by directing maximum radiation power at an area below the horizon. This technique . . .



Improves coverage of open areas close to the base station.

penetration of nearby buildings, particular •  Allows more effective penetration high-traffic lower levels and garages.



Permits the use of adjacent frequencies in the same general region.

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL

65

© Comm CommScope Scope

 

Elec tric al/ l/Mec Mech hanica ical Dow own ntilt



Mechanical downtilt lowers main beam, raises back lobe. Electrical downtilt lowers main beam and lowers back lobe.

• mechanical downtilts •  A combination of equal electrical and mechanical lowers main beam and brings back lobe onto the horizon!

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL

66

© Comm CommScope Scope

 

(C ont ontiinu nued ed )

Elec tric al/ l/Mec Mech hanica ical Dow own ntilt

Mec hanic al

Elec tric al

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL

© Comm CommScope Scope

 

DB50 DB 5083 83 Downt Downtilt ilt Mo Mount unting ing Kit DB5083 downtilt mounting kit is constructed of heavy duty galvanized steel, designed for pipe mounting 12”” to 20 12 20”” wi wide de pa pane nell a ant nten enna nas. s.

• Correct bracket calibration assumes a plumb mounting pipe!

• Check antenna with a digital level. PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL

67

© Comm CommScope Scope

 

Mech Mec hanic nic al Down ownttil iltt Pattern Analogy—Rotating A Disk

Mechanical tilt causes . . .

• Beam peak to tilt below horizon • Back lobe to tilt above horizon •  At ± 90°, no tilt

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL

68

69

© Comm CommScope Scope

 

Mech Mec hanic al Down Downttil iltt C ove over rage 100

90

100

80

110 120 130 140

150

160

170

10

180

0

190

350

340

200

210

330

320

300 290 260

270   280

Elevation Pattern

40

30

160

20

310

50

150

30

220

60

140

40

230

70

130

50

250

80

120

60

240

90

110

70

20

170

10

180

0

190

350

200

340

210

330 320

220 230

310 240

300 250

290 260

270   280

 Azimuth Pattern

Mechanical Tilt 0° 4° 6° 8° 10° PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL

© Comm CommScope Scope

 

0° Mech Mec hanic al Dow own ntilt

Quiz

What is the vertical beamwidth of a 4-element array?

85°

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL

70

© Comm CommScope Scope

 

7° Mech Mec hanic al Dow own ntilt

93°

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL

71

© Comm CommScope Scope

 

15° Mech Mec hanic al Dow Down ntilt

123°

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL

72

© Comm CommScope Scope

 

20° Mech Mec hanic al Dow Down ntilt

Horizontal 3 dB Bandwidth Undefined

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL

73

74

© Comm CommScope Scope

 

Managing Beam Tilt •

For the radiation pattern to show maximum gain in the direction of the horizon, each stacked dipole must be fed from the signal source in phase. phase.



Feeding vertically arranged dipoles out of phase will generate patterns that look up or look down. down.



The degree of beam tilt is a function of the phase shift of one dipole relative to the adjacent dipole.

Generating Beam Tilt Dipoles Fed In Phase

Dipoles Fed Out of Phase

Energy in

Phase Exciter

Exciter

  e    t    v   a     n     r  o     W    F

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL

© Comm CommScope Scope

 

Ele lec c tric ica al Downt wntilt

Pattern Analogy—Forming A Cone Out Of A Disk

Electrical tilt causes . . .

• •

Beam peak to tilt below horizon Back lobe to tilt below horizon

•  At ± 90°, tilt below horizon •  All the pattern tilts Cone of the Beam Peak Pattern

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL

75

76

© Comm CommScope Scope

 

Elec lecttric ica al Do Downtil iltt C over verage 110

100

90

80

110

70

120

90

80

70

120

60

50

140

40

140

60

130

50

130

100

40

150

30

30

150

160

20

160

20

170

10

170

10

180

0

180

0

190

350

190

350

200

340

210

330

220

320 230

310 240

300 250

260

270

280

290

Elevation Pattern Electrical Tilt

200

340

210

330 320

220 230

310 240

300 250

260

270

280

290

 Azimuth Pattern 0° 4° 6° 8° 10°

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL

© Comm CommScope Scope

 

Mech Mec hanic ica al Vs. Vs. Elec Electtrica ical Do Downtil iltt 340

  350

0

10

20 30

330

40

320

50

310

60

300

70

290

80

280

90

270

100

260

110 110

250

120

240 130

230 220

140 210

150 200 190

160 180

170

Mechanical

Electrical

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL

77

© Comm CommScope Scope

 

Remo motte Ele lec c trica ic al Downt Downtilt (R (RE ET) Optimization

 ATM200-002 RET Device (Actuator)

Local PC

 ATC200-LITE-USB Portable Controller 

Local PC

 ANMS™ Remote Locations

 ATC300-1000 Rack Mount Controller  Network Server 

78

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL

79

© Comm CommScope Scope

 

Inte Int ermod mod Int Inte erference nc e Where?

F3

F1

Tx F1

Rx F3

F2

Tx F1

Receiver-Produced

Transmitter-Produced

Tx

Tx F

F2

2

F1 F2

F1 Tx1

F3 F2

Tx2

Rx F3

F2

Elsewhere

Rx F3 Tx1 Tx2

C O M B

F3

DUP Rx3 RF Path-Produced

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

 

High Band

Product Frequencies, Two-Signal IM FIM = nF1 ± mF2 Example: F1 = 1945 MHz; F2 = 1930 MHz

n

m

Product Order

1

1

Second

1F1 + 1F2 1F1 – 1F2

3875 15

2

1

Third

2F1 + 1F2

5820

*2F1 – 1F2 2F2 + 1F1 *2F2 – 1F1

1960 5805 1915

2F1 + 2F2 2F1 – 2F2

7750 30

Product Formulae

Product Frequencies (MHz)

1

2

Third

2

2

Fourth

3

2

Fifth

3F1 + 2F2 *3F1 – 2F2

9695 1975

2

3

Fifth

3F2 + 2F1 *3F2 – 2F1

9680 1900

*Odd-order difference products fall in-band.

80

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

 

Two-Signal IM

Odd-Order Difference Products Example: F1 = 1945 MHz; F2 = 1930 MHz  ΔF

= F1 - F2 = 15 F1 1945

F2 1930  ΔF

dBc

3F2 – 2F1

2F2 – F1

2F1 – F2

1915

1960

1900

 ΔF

ΔF

 

2 ΔF 5th

dBm

3F1 – 2F2 1975

2 ΔF 3rd

F2

F1

Third Order: F1 +  ΔF; F2 -   ΔF Fifth Order: F1 + 2 ΔF; F2 - 2 ΔF Seventh Order: F1 + 3 ΔF; F2 - 3 ΔF Higher than than the highest highest – lower than the lowest lowest – none in-betwee in-between n

3rd

5th

81

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

 

PC S A 11th Band9thInt Inte e7th rmo mod d5th ulat ulation io n 3rd 1855

1870

1885

1900

1915

Channe nnell Ban Bandwid dwidth th Cha Block C C1 C2 C3 C4 C5

(MHz) 30 15 15 10 10 10

1930

1945

FCC Broadband PCS Band Plan Frequencies 1895–1910, 1975–1990 1902.5–1910, 1982.5–1990 1895–1902.5, 1975–1982.5 1895–1900, 1975–1980 1900–1905, 1980–1985 1905–1910, 1985–1990

Note: Some of the original C block licenses (originally 30 MHz each) were split into multiple licenses (C-1 and C-2: 15 MHz; C-3, C-4, and C-5: 10 MHz).

82

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

 

PC S A & F Band Inte Int ermod modula ulattion ion 3rd 1895

Channell Ban Channe Bandwi dwidth dth Block C C1 C2 C3 C4 C5

(MHz) 30 15 15 10 10 10

1935

1975

FCC Broadband PCS Band Plan Frequencies 1895–1910, 1975–1990 1902.5–1910, 1982.5–1990 1895–1902.5, 1975–-1982.5 1895–1900, 1975–1980 1900–1905, 1980–1985 1905–1910, 1985–1990

Note: Some of the original C block licenses (originally 30 MHz each) were split into multiple licenses (C-1 and C-2: 15 MHz; C-3, C-4, and C-5: 10 MHz).

83

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

 

C ause uses Of IM IMD D • Ferromagnetic materials in the current path: -

Steel

-

Nickel plating or underplating

• Current disruption: -

Loosely contacting surfaces

-

Non-conductive oxide layers between contact surfaces

84

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

 

System VS VSW WR C alc lcula ulattSystem or VSWR Calculator  Calculator  Version 9.0 Frequency (MHz): Component Used?

No No No No No No No No No No

850.00

18- Mar- 09

System Comp o on nent

Max. V VS SWR

Return Loss (dB)

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

Antenna or L oad Antenna Jumper Tower Mounted Amp Jumper Top Diplexer or Bias Tee Jumper Main Feed Line Jumper  Bias Tee Jumper Surge Suppressor

1.50 1.05 1.20 1.09 1.15 1.09 1.07 1.09 1.15 1.09 1.07

13.98 32.26 20.83 27.32 23.13 27.32 29.42 27.32 23.13 27.32 29.42

2 2 1

2 2 1

Jumper Bottom Diplexer or Duplexer Jumper

1.09 1.20 1.08

27.32 20.83 28.30

An dr ew ew

Co mm S c co o pe

No No  Yes

Cable Type / Component Loss (dB)

Cable Length (m)

Cable Length (ft)

2 0.20 2 0.20 2.00 8 4 0.10 2.00 0.10

1.83

6.00

1.83

6.00

1.83 200.00 30.48 11.00 1.83

6.00 656.17 100.00 36.09 6.00

 VXL7-50 LDF4-50A 

     

Ins Loss w/2 Conn (dB) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

% of Est. Reflections at System input Reflection 87.2% 0.1003 0.0% 0.0000 0.0% 0.0000 0.0% 0.0000 0.0% 0.0000 0.0% 0.0000 0.0% 0.0000 0.0% 0.0000 0.0% 0.0000 0.0% 0.0000 0.0% 0.0000

 

 

3.00 0.10 1.00

FSJ4-50B

1.83

6.00

27.30

89.57

0.00 0.00 3.00

0.0% 0.0% 12. 8%

0.0000 0.0000 0.0385

100.0%

Legacy Jumper Jumper / TL Cables 1/2 inch Superflexible Copper  1/2 inch Foam Copper 

FSJ4-50B LDF4-50A

1/2 inch Superflexible Aluminum 1/2 inch Foam Aluminum

Legacy Transmission Lines 7/8 inch Copper  1 1/4 inch Copper  1 5/8 inch Copper  7/8 inch Very Flexible Copper  1 1/4 inch Very Flexible Copper  1 5/8 inch Very Flexible Copper  7/8 inch Virtual Air Copper   Yes

1 5/8 inch Virtual Air Copper  7/8 inch Aluminum

An dr ew ew

LDF5-50A LDF6-50 LDF7-50A VXL5-50 VXL6-50 VXL7-50 AVA5-50 AVA7-50 AL5-50

1 1/4 inch Aluminum 1 5/8 inch Aluminum No

AL7-50

CR 540 SFX 500 FXL 540

Estimated Conn Loss ( 2per cable)

0.028

Typical System Reflection: Typical System VSWR: Typical System Return Loss (dB):

0.1074 1.24 19.4

Worst System Reflection: Worst System VSWR: Worst System Return Loss (dB):

0.1387 1.32 17.2

Co om mm Sc Scop e

CR 1070 CR 1480 CR 1873

Total Insertion Loss (dB):

F XL 780 FXL 1480 FXL 1873

3.00

Ret urn L oss to V S SW W R co nve rt rt er

Feet t o met er s con ver te ter  

Return Loss (dB) 17.00

VSWR

F eet

meters

1.33

100.00

30.48

85

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

 

Possible C asc aded VSW VSWR Results

Possible results (at a given frequency) when Antenna and TMA are interconnected with interconnected different electrical length jumpers. If: L = 1.5:1 (14 dB RL Antenna) Antenna) S = 1.2:1 (20.8 dB RL TMA) TM A)

Then: X (max) = 1.8:1 (10.9 dB RL) S (min) = 1.25:1 (19.1 dB RL)

Worst case seldom happens in r ea eall lif e, but be aware aware that it is possible!

From http://www.home.agilent.com/agilent/editorial.jspx?cc=US&lc=eng&ckey=895674&nid=-35131.0.00&id=895674

86

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

 

Rec omme mmende nded dA Ant ntenna nna/ TMA Q Qua uali liffic ica ation Test 50 ohm load

 Antenna

6 foot LDF4-50A  Adapter or jumper to bypass TMA

6 foot LDF4-50A

TMA

TMA

12 foot LDF4-50A 12 foot LDF4-50A

Transmission Line

20 foot FSJ4-50

 Antenna Return Loss Diagram

Transmission Line

20 foot FSJ4-50

TMA Return Loss Diagram

87

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

 

Attenua nuattio ion n Provid vide ed B By y Ver Vertic ica al Separation Of Dipole Antennas 70

60

50

   B    d   n    i 40   n   o    i    t   a    l   o30   s    I

  H  z   M     0  0   2  0

  H  z   M     0   8  5

  H  z   M     0  4  5

  H  z   H  z   M   M       0   7  5   1  6

  H  z   M    4  0

20

10 1 (0.3) (30.48)

2 (0.61)

3 (0.91)

5 (1.52)

10 (3.05)

20 (6.1)

30 (9.14)

50 (15.24)

100

 Antenna Spacing in Feet (Meters)

The values indicated by these curves are approximate because of coupling which exists between the antenna and transmission line. Curves are based on the use of half-wave dipole antennas. The curves will also provide acceptable results for gain type antennas. If values (1) the spacing is measured between the physical center of the tower antennas and it (2) one antenna is mounted directly above the other, with no horizontal offset collinear). No correction factor is required for the antenna gains.

88

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

 

Attenuation Provided By Horizontal Separation Of Dipole Antennas 80

 z M H  0  M  0  0  2  H z    8 5 0   0  M M  z M H   M  4 5 0

70

60

   B    d   n    i   n50   o    i    t   a    l   o40   s    I

 z M H   M  0  5  1  z M H  0  M  7  M M H z  5 0   z  M M H  3 0 

30

20 10 (3.05) (304.8)

20 (6.1)

30 (9.14)

50 (15.24)

100 (30.48)

200 (60.96)

300 (91.44)

500 50 (152.4)

1000

 Antenna Spacing in Feet (Meters)

Curves are based on the use of half-wave dipole antennas. The curves will also provide acceptable results for gain type antennas antennas if (1) the indicated isolation isolation is reduced by the sum of the antenna gains gains and (2) the spacing between the gain antennas is at least 50 ft. (15.24 m) (approximately the far field).

89

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

 

Pattern Dist Disto ortions ions

Conductive (metallic) obstruction in the path of transmit and/or receive antennas may distort antenna radiation patterns in a way that causes systems coverage problems and degradation of communications services. A few basic precautions will prevent pattern distortions.

 Additional information on metal obstructions can also be found found online at: www.akpce.com/page2/page2.html

90

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

 

Pattern Dist Disto ortio ions ns

Side Of Building Mounting

Building

91

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

 

90° 90 ° Horizonta izontal Pattern

Obstruction @ –10 dB Point 340

350

0

10

20

0

330 320

30 40

-5 -10

310

50

-15

300

880 MHz

60

-20 290

70

-25 -30

280

80

-35 270

90

-40

260

100

250

0°   –10 dB Point  3 ½'

110

240

120 230

130 220

140 210

150 200

190

180

170

160

Building Antenna

Corner 

92

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

 

90° 90 ° Horizonta izontal Pattern

Obstruction @ –6 dB Point 340

350

0

10

20

0

330 320

30 40

-5 -10

310

50

-15

300

880 MHz

60

-20 290

0

-25 -30

280

80

-35 270

90

-40

260

100

250



 –6 dB Point Point

  '   3  ½

Building Corner 

110

240

120 230

130 220

140 210

150 200

190

180

170

160

Antenna

93

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

 

90° Horizonta izontal P Pa attern Obstruction @ –3 dB Point 340

350

0

10

20

0

330 320

30 40

-5 -10

310

50

-15

300

880 MHz

60

-20 290

0

-25 -30

280

80

-35 270

 –3 dB Point 90

-40

260

100

250



  '    ½   3

110

240

120 230

130 220

140 210

150 200

190

180

170

160

Antenna

Building Corner 

94

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

 

90° Horizonta izontal P Pa attern

0.51λ Diameter Obstacle @ 0° 340

350

0

10

20

0

330 320

30 40

-5 -10

310

50

-15

300

880 MHz

60

-20 290

0

-25 -30

280

80

-35 270

90

-40

260

100

250

0° 12λ

110

120

240 230

130 220

140 210

150 200

190

180

170

160

Antenna

95

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

 

90° Horizonta izontal P Pa attern

0.51λ Diameter Obstacle @ 45° 340

350

0

10

20

0

330 320

30 40

-5 -10

310

50

-15

300

880 MHz

60

-20 290

0

-25 -30

280

80

-35 270

90

-40

45°

100

260 250



110

120

240

130

230 220

140 210

150 200

190

180

170

160

Antenna

96

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

97

 

90° Horizonta izontal P Pa attern

0.51λ Diameter Obstacle @ 60° 350

0

10

340

20 0

330 320

30 40

-5 -10

310

50

-15

300

880 MHz

60

-20 290

0

-25 -30

280

80

-35 270

90

-40

60° 260

100

250



110

Antenna 240

120 230

130 220

140 210

150 200

190

180

170

160

 Additional information on metal obstructions can also be found online at www.akpce.com/page2/page2.html www.akpce.com/page2/page2.html..

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

98

 

90° Horizonta izontal P Pa attern

0.51λ Diameter Obstacle @ 80° 350

0

10

340

20 0

330 320

30 40

-5 -10

310

50

-15

300

880 MHz

60

-20 290

0

-25 -30

280

80

-35 270

90

-40

260

100

250

80°

 λ

110

240

120 230

Antenna

130 220

140 210

150 200

190

180

170

160

 Additional information on metal obstructions can also be found online at www.akpce.com/page2/page2.html www.akpce.com/page2/page2.html..

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

 

General Rule

 Area That Needs To Be Free Of Of Obstructions (> 0.51λ) Maximum Gain > 12 WL

3 dB Point (45°)    L   8       W   >  8 

6 dB Point (60°)

  L   W     6     > WL

> 3 WL

10 dB Point (8 (80– 0– 90 90°) °)

 Antenna 90° horiz horizontal ontal (3 dB dB)) bea beamwidt mwidth h

99

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

 

Pattern Dist Disto ortions ions

D

θ

d

d D d = D x tan θ tan 1° = 0.01745 for 0 0°° < θ< 10° : tan θ = θ x tan 1° tan θ =

Note: tan 10° = 0.176 0.1763 3

10 x 0.01745 0.01745 = 0.1745 0.1745

100

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

 

Gain Point ints Of A Typ ypic ica al Main Main Lobe

θº θ  Relative to Maximum Maximum Gain Gain

Vertical Beam Width= 2 x θ° (–3 dB point)

 –3 dB point point θ° be belo low w bo bore resi site te..  –6 dB point point 1.35 x   θ° be belo low w bore boresi site te..  –10 dB point point 1.7x θ° be belo low w bore boresi site te..

101

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

 

C ha hange nges s In Antenn nna a Performa manc nce e In The P Pr resenc nce e Of: Non-Conductive Obstructions

 9   0  °   P   C 

Fiberglass Panel

 S  A n  t    e n n  a

Dim “A”

102

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL

103

© Comm CommScope Scope

 

Performanc mance e Of 90° PC S Antenna nna Behin hind dC Ca amo mouf ufla lag ge (¼ (¼" " Fiber ibergla las ss) 120°

FIBERGLASS PANEL

110°   e   r   u    t   r   e   p 100°    A    l     t   a   n 90°   o   z    i   r   o    H 80°

DIM “A”

1/2

1/4

1-1/2

1

3/4

2

70° 0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Distance of Camouflage (Inches) (Dim. A)

11

12

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL © Comm CommScope Scope

 

Performanc mance e Of 90° PC S Antenna nna Behin hind dC Ca amo mouf ufla lag ge (¼ (¼" " Fiber ibergla las ss) 1.7

1.6    )   e   s   a    C 1.5    t   s   r   o

FIBERGLASS PANEL

DIM “A”

   W1.4    (    R    W    S 1.3    V 1/4

1.2 0

1

1/2

2

3

1

4

5

6

1-1/2

7

8

9

2

10 10

11

12

Distance of Camouflage (Inches) (Dim. A) W/Plain Façade

W/Ribbed Façade

Without Facade

104

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL

105

© Comm CommScope Scope

 

Dis Di stanc nce e From Fib ibe ergla las ss 0° 330°

30°

90°

300°

0° 330°

60°

270°

90°

90°

-55

-55

-50

-50 -45

-45 -40

240°

210°

-40

240°

120°

120°

-35

-35

-30

-30

-25 -20

102°

300°

60°

270°

30°

210°

150°

-25 -20

150°

180°

180° 0°

No Fiberglass

330°

30°

300°

68° 60°

270°

90° -50 -45 -40 -35

240°

120°

-30 -25

210°

-20 -15

180°

150°

3" to Fiberglass

1.5 to Fiberglass PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL

106

© Comm CommScope Scope

 

Dis Di stanc nce e From Fib ibe ergla las ss 0° 330°

30°

300°



77°

330°

60°

270°

90°

90°

-50

-50

-45

-45 -40

-40 -35

240°

-35

240°

120°

120° -30

-30

-25

-25

210°

-20 -15

112°

300°

60°

270°

30°

210°

150°

-20 -15

150°

180°

180° 0°

4" to Fiberglass

330°

30°

300°

108° 60°

270°

90° -50 -45 -40 -35

240°

120° -30 -25

210°

-20 -15

180°

150°

6" to Fiberglass

View more...

Comments

Copyright ©2017 KUPDF Inc.
SUPPORT KUPDF