Anexo 5 - Estudio de Caso Tarea 3

 

  TAREA 3 – ADMINISTRACIÓN DE LA SEGURIDAD Y SALUD EN EL TRABAJO

 PRESENTADO POR: ADALBERTO DIAZ BENITEZ 1103118187

TUTOR:  ANA MARÍA BARRERA

 GRUPO: 102505_10

UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL ABIERTA Y A DISTANCIA UNAD 2022 COROZAL SUCRE SALUD OCUPACIONAL

 

Guía de actividades y rúbrica de evaluación - Unidad 2 - Tarea 3 Administración de la Seguridad y Salud en el Trabajo Anexo 5 - Estudio de caso Tarea 3

A co cont ntin inua uaci ción ón,, se pres presen enta ta el Caso Caso de es estu tudi dio o a trav través és del del cu cual al realizara la actividad solicitada para la Guía de Actividades de la Tarea 3. CASE STUDY – AMPUTATION IN MEAT GRINDER 

A 15-year-old part-time worker (the victim) at a retail grocery store suffered amputation of the right arm as a result of being caught by the auger of a meat grinder while he was reassembling it. Thee vi Th vict ctim im,, work workin ing g af afte terr scho school ol,, had had comp comple lete ted d wa wash shin ing g an and d cleaning the disassembled parts of the grinder and was reassembling it without de-energizing and locking out the machine's power supply (See Photos Below). He inserted the auger into the grinder's housing and reached through the feed-throat with his right hand to guide it into engagement. As he did so, he bumped against the unprotected on/off lever switch mounted about waist high on the machine's side. The grinder andmachine the auger the housing. He started turned the off,pulled pulledhishishand arm and fromarm theinto grinder housing and ran toward the front of the store. The store manager applied pressure to his bleeding arm while a coworker called 911. The victim was transported to a local hospital. His right arm had been amputated just below the elbow. A magnetic safety switch mounted on top of the motor starter was designed to prevent operation when the Removable Tub was taken off. The safety switch had not worked for over 16 years and an d empl employ oyee eess were were not not awar awaree th that at the the sa safe fety ty swit switch ch ex exis iste ted. d. (Source: http://www.cdc.gov/ w.cdc.gov/niosh/face/Inho niosh/face/Inhouse/full200013.ht use/full200013.html ml) ) http://ww

A.

Actividad:

Realice el análisis del accidente sucedido con el fin de hallar la causa raíz, utilice la metodología de investigació investigación n de accidentes Árbol de causas o Diagrama de Ishikawa para este análisis. Discuta con su grup gr upo o cola colabo bora rati tivo vo pa para ra que que cada cada inte integr gran ante te se en enfo foqu quee en un unaa metodología diferente.

Referente Bibliográfico

   

Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (06 de 2022). United states https://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/2018t/files/2018department departm ent of labor . Obtenido de https://www.osha.gov/sites/defaul 12/fy10_sh-20856-10_Machine_Guarding_Case_Studies.pdf

Actividad TAREA 3.

Realice el análisis del accidente sucedido con el fin de hallar la causa raíz, utilice una de las siguientes metodologías de investigación investigació n de accidentes:

 



Árbol de causas Amputación del brazo derecho

Atrapamiento de barrena de picadora de carne

Contacto con la fuente de alimentación de la maquina

Barrena le meó la Molinillo girando Conector ala mano altura de la cintura Choque contra el interruptor de encendido/apagado

Trabajador en el lado atrapante

Analisis de riesgo deciente

Limpiando sin desconectar Procedimiento deciente fuente de alimentación de la maquina Maquina no cumple con las normas

 

  Respon Resp onda da la si sigu guie ient nte e pr preg egun unta ta:: Wh What at was was the the ma main in cause of the incident?

The main cause of the accident was mainly that the machine did not comply with elements, well the bad procedure onthe thenecessary part of thesafety worker when heasdid notasrealize that the machine was connected