Alvarez Assessment

December 4, 2017 | Author: danilo sugot | Category: Defamation, Social Institutions, Society, Criminal Law, Crimes
Share Embed Donate


Short Description

task for IT...

Description

Name: Mirasol O. Alvarez

Date: 10-20-16

Course/Year: BSIT- 4

Score: ASSESSMENT TASK 1

Faye, one of the employees of TABAKO Corp. inform his superior through an email message that Seano, President of the employees Union is planning to commit Arson by burning the warehouse where important equipment and supplies were stored. Seano filed a defamation case against Faye. Do you think Faye is guilty of defamation? Why or Why not?

Answer: Faye is not guilty of defamation nevertheless Faye is or might be libelous acts on accusing fellow worker Seano on arson with presenting valid evidence of arson’s threat.

Name: Mirasol O. Alvarez

Date: 10-20-16

Course/Year: BSIT- 4

Score:

ASSESSMENT TASK 2

Mr. Pang Ulo is the President of San Isidro Heights, Homeowners Association. Since most of the homeowners on that subdivision are multimillionaires Mr. Pang Ulo and the homeowners maintained a Facebook (FB) group wherein all the homeowners are members. One day, Pang Ulo post in his status message on the said FB group all the names delinquent homeowners, that is, those members who failed to pay their monthly dues. Having them demoralized, the affected parties filed a Cyber libel case against Mr. Pang Ulo. Do you think the case will Prosper? Answer: The case will not prosper because, If Pang Ulo is just posting a relatively honest information on homeowners rights, previledges, and responsibilities! But if the information given on FB group is false and does not tell the truth but just a kind of ignorance, the Pang Ulo would be liable to Defamation not Libel.

Name: Mirasol O. Alvarez

Date: 10-20-16

Course/Year: BSIT- 4

Score:

ASSESSMENT TASK 3

Atty. Tabako wrote “Hari ng kapalpakan, hari ng kaplastikan” in his Twitter update, alluding to a well-known plastic surgeon Cikie Cello. His Twitter account is protected, and therefore only people that he approved to follow him are allowed access to his message updates. Said wellknown surgeon got wind of Atty. Tabako’s message, through his friend who was following Atty. Tabako’s Twitter account. Will Atty. Tabako be liable under Philippine cyber libel laws? Why or why not? Answer: No because, In the first place, no one was being accused of crimes, Just because of the word "Plastic" or hari ng kaplastikan. In fact, Cikie Cello was not accused as plastic. Only being alluded in the premise of Tabako.

Name: Mirasol O. Alvarez

Date: 10-20-16

Course/Year: BSIT- 4

Score:

ASSESSMENT TASKS 4

Alicia Alegre, during 2014 FHM 100 Sexiest Women, suffered wardrobe malfunction making a full exposure of her breast. Manny Yak, one of the audiences was videotaping her using mobile phone. Alicia requested Manny Yak to delete the video from her mobile phone. Manny denied her request. Alicia filed a criminal complaint against Manny Yak for violation of RA 9995. Do you think the case against Manny Yak will prosper? Justify your answer. Answer: In the case of Manny Yak will prosper because, without the permission of Alicia Alegre, Manny Yak will be punishable by law according to R.A 9995. An act defining and penalizing the crime of photo and video voyeurism.

View more...

Comments

Copyright ©2017 KUPDF Inc.
SUPPORT KUPDF