ACCA F2 Revision Mock - Answers J12

March 16, 2017 | Author: Abubakar Raliat | Category: N/A
Share Embed Donate


Short Description

Download ACCA F2 Revision Mock - Answers J12...

Description

ACCA Paper F2 Management Accounting June 2012

Revision Mock – Answers To gain maximum benefit, do not refer to these answers until you have completed the revision mock questions and submitted them for marking.

ACCA F2: MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING

© Kaplan Financial Limited, 2012

The text in this material and any others made available by any Kaplan Group company does not amount to advice on a particular matter and should not be taken as such. No reliance should be placed on the content as the basis for any investment or other decision or in connection with any advice given to third parties. Please consult your appropriate professional adviser as necessary. Kaplan Publishing Limited and all other Kaplan group companies expressly disclaim all liability to any person in respect of any losses or other claims, whether direct, indirect, incidental, consequential or otherwise arising in relation to the use of such materials. All rights reserved. No part of this examination may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without prior permission from Kaplan Publishing. 2

KAPLAN PUBLISHING

REVISION MOCK ANSWERS

1

B – FALSE The definition given is that of a flexed budget.

2

D

3

C Economic order quantity

=

2C OD CH

Economic order quantity

=

2 x $10 × 80,000 units 0.90

Economic order quantity

=

1,333 units

4

B

5

D (65,800 + 82,600 + 60,100)/3 = 69,500 82,600 – 69,500 = 13,100 units

6

C High level = number of units: 48

Total cost $7,100

Low level = number of units: 23

Total cost $5, 200

Difference = 25 units

Difference in costs $1,900

Therefore variable cost per unit = $1,900 ÷ 25 units = $76 Fixed costs = $7100 – ($76 × 48 units) = $3,452

7

D

8

A

9

A

10

B

11

C

KAPLAN PUBLISHING

3

ACCA F2: MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING

12

A Fixed production overhead capacity variance = Budgeted hours worked

25,000

Less: actual hours worked

(24,000) –––––– 1,000 –––––– × standard fixed production overhead cost per hour $5 = $5,000 By only working 24,000 hours, overheads would be under-absorbed – an adverse effect.

13

D

14

A Overheads absorbed for the period

= $4.50 × 3,850 labour hours = $17,325

Overheads incurred for the period

= $18,225

Total overheads under-absorbed

= $900

15

C

16

D

17

D

18

C

19

B

20

A

21

C EOQ = √ ((2 × $30 × (5,000 × 4))/0.192) = 2,500 units

22

D

23

D

24

A Contribution per unit = $35 – ($8 + $8.50 + $3.50) = $15

4

Total contribution = $15 × 6,100 units sold

$91,500

Less = Fixed costs

($30,000)

Marginal profit

$61,500 KAPLAN PUBLISHING

REVISION MOCK ANSWERS

25

26

B Marginal costing profit

$61,500

Add: OAR included in closing stock $4 × 400 units

$1,600

Absorption profit for the month

$63,100

VC per unit = (13,900 – 10,100)/(3,000 – 2,000) = $3.80 FC in total = 10,100 – (2,000 × 3.80) = $2,500 Total cost for 3,750 units = ($2,500 × 1.05) + (3,750 × $3.80) = $16,875

27

B

28

C 10 + [20000/(20000- -30000)] × (20–10) = 14%

29

B Laspeyre price index ∑(current year price × base year quantity)/∑(base year price × base year quantity) × 100 [(55×150) + (80×250) + (82×275)]/[(50×150) + (70×250) + (75×275)] × 100 = 111

30

A Paasche quantity index ∑(current year quantity × current year price)/∑(base year quantity × current year price) × 100 [(175×55) + (300×80) + (325×82)]/[(150×55) + (250×80) + (275×82)] × 100 = 119

31

Fully completed units Partially completed 50 units × 60% completion Total

32

300 units 30 units 330 units

B Normal output = 12,000 – 10% × 12,000

10,800

Actual Output

11,050

Abnormal gain

250 kgs

KAPLAN PUBLISHING

5

ACCA F2: MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING

33

B Average cost per kg

=

(48,000 + 30,000 + 42,000) – (1,200 × 1) 12,000 – 1,200

= $11 per kg

34

C T0

($100,000)

T1–T5

Revenue

$7,000 × 12 × 3.605

$302,820

T1–T5

Cost

$17,750 × 3.605

($63,989)

T5

Residual value

$20,000 × 0.567

$11,340 $150,171

35

D Process 1 12,000

Material input (litres) Normal loss

Process 2 12,000

240

600

Expected output

11,760

11,400

Actual output

11,550

11,450

(210)

50

Abnormal (loss) / gain

36 Statement of Equivalent Units Material

Finished Goods Closing WIP

Conversion

Units

Degree of completion

Equivalent Units

4,500

100%

4,500

100%

4,500

500

100%

500

75%

375

Total EU Total cost Cost per EU Therefore value of closing WIP

Degree of completion

Equivalent Units

5,000

4,875

$14,500

$24,375

$2.90

$5.00

= 500 units × $2.90 + 375 equivalent units × $5.00 = $3,325

37

C Cluster sampling is similar to multi-stage sampling but the final step is to sample every item in the final sub-division.

6

KAPLAN PUBLISHING

REVISION MOCK ANSWERS

38

D The difference in profit is due to fixed overheads included in inventory valuation. The profit is higher under absorption costing indicating that inventory has increased. Increase in inventory (value) = $8,000 Increase in inventory (units) = 8,000 ÷ 4 = 2,000 units Production = sales + increase in inventory = 12,000 + 2,000 = 14,000

39

C

40

A $2,000,000/$4,000,000 × ($5,000,000 – $4,000,000) = $500,000

41

Total sales value of the units produced = (14,000 × 10) + (15,000 × 14) = $350,000 Production cost apportioned to Beta = $850,230/$350,000 × (15,000 × 14) = $510,138 Closing inventory of Beta = 15,000 – 12,000 = 3,000 units Value of closing inventory = $510,138/15,000 × 3,000 = $102,028

42

C A service industry is an industry not involved in agriculture, mining, construction or manufacturing.

43

B Overheads incurred Over-absorption

$2,375

Therefore overheads absorbed OAR =

$74,375

$74,375 = $4.25 17,500

Budgeted hours =

44

$72,000

68,000 = 16,000 hours 4.25

48,000 units to produce + increase in stocks of 1,500 units = 49,500 units 49,500 units @ 2kgs per unit = 99,000 kgs Add increase in stocks of raw materials = 1,750 kgs Total material purchases budget 100,750 kgs

45

B The number of labour hours used to produce 5,000 units is 9,550, and these have cost $52,525. If we had paid the standard cost of $6 an hour, this would have cost $57,300, which gives us a favourable labour rate variance of $4,775.

KAPLAN PUBLISHING

7

ACCA F2: MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING

46

C We should have used 10,000 hours to produce 5,000 units. Instead, we have only used 9,950 hours. This is a favourable hour saving of 450 hours, which at the standard hourly rate of $6, gives a favourable labour efficiency rate of $2,700.

47

B

48

A OAR = $4.00 per labour hour Expenditure Variance = $64,000 – $62,500 = $1,500 (favourable) Capacity Variance = (16,000 hours – 15,000 hours) × $4.00 / hour = $4,000 (adverse) The total of these two variances is $2,500 (adverse) OR Actual overheads = $62,500 Absorbed overhead = 15,000 × 4 = $60,000 Overhead under-absorbed = $2,500

49

A

50

B

8

KAPLAN PUBLISHING

View more...

Comments

Copyright ©2017 KUPDF Inc.
SUPPORT KUPDF