93361115 Egyptian Numerology the Pythagorean Triangle and Its Esoteric Meaning

May 6, 2019 | Author: Giuseppe Marsico | Category: N/A
Share Embed Donate


Short Description

Esoteric meanings of the triangle in the pythagorean and egyptian tradition...

Description

Egyptian Numerology: the Pythagorean Triangle and Its Esoteric Meaning Some Historic Notes and Brief Comments on Sacred Geometry   Ant  Anton onie iett ttaa Franc rancin ini, i, S.R. S.R.C., C., M.D. M.D.,, wit with  h Benefactor Benefactor Taciturnus  , F.R. F.R.C. C.

I

t is not always easy to fully grasp the  wonder and the depth of Pythagoras’s  insights and accomplishments with the  scarce information that we actually have  about his school in the south of Italy and his  esoteric teachings. We can, however, explore the  inspirations of one of his most famous theorems  which still bears his name today, concerning the  triangle and its many ramifications.

Most Western mathematical development and architecture derived rom Pythagoras’s capacity or a deep understanding o the wisdom o even more ancient cultures. Pythagoras, who traveled extensively  and dedicated his lie to learning the arts and sciences o ancient traditions, was able to synthesize all o this learning into practical aspects o harmony, mathematics, and the art o living.  Acco  Accord rdin ingg to his his disci discipl plee and oll ollow ower er,, Plato, the circle and the interaction o two circles, where the center o each circle lies on the circumerence o the other (the so-called Vesica Piscis ), ), became the core o all solids. Following this train o thought, Geometry 

Rosicrucian Digest No. 1 2009

Vesica Piscis, which literally means “the bladder o a ish” in Latin.

Page xl 

becomes Music, and Music becomes Cosmic Harmony and the Music o the Spheres.  As part part o this this esoter esoteric ic teach teaching ing,, the the ancient Egyptian right triangle, having a  primarily mystical meaning, became the oundation o mathematical calculations and construction. Here we will consider the history and transormation o the amous Pythagorean riangle and the mathematical and symbolic importance o the relationships between the numbers 3, 4, and 5, rom the viewpoint o  modern scholarship, which is deeply imbued  with  with the the pri primor mordi dial al trad tradit itio ion. n. Egyptian Numerology  he Egyptians believed in the importance o numbers.1 Perhaps the oremost proponent o this reality was the leading student o symbolist Egypt, Réné Schwaller de Lubicz (1887-1961) rom  Alsac  Alsacee-Lor Lorrai raine, ne, France rance:: “Schwaller de Lubicz’s second thesis is mathematical. Both the deliberate use o  harmonic proportions in art and architecture and the numerical basis underlying  Egyptian myth compelled him to a detailed reconsideration o Pythagoreanism, and to the construction o a system o thought consonant with the masterpieces o Egypt—  with  with the act o an empir empiree that that last lasted ed our our thousand years. “‘Number is All’, declared the Pythagoreans. What is today called Pythagorean

number mysticism is Egyptian in origin (i not older still) and corresponds to the underlying philosophy behind all the arts and sciences o Egypt. In eect, what Pythagoras did was to un-dramatize myth—a strategy  that had the advantage o talking directly to those capable o thinking along these lines. “he work o Schwaller de Lubicz and the independent but complementary work  o a ew other contemporary thinkers (J.G. Bennett, or example) has made it possible to re-express Pythagorean theory in a way  acceptable to our thinking. When we reapply  this to Egyptian myth it becomes clear that these curious tales are based upon an understanding o number and the interplay  o number, not upon animism, tribal superstitions, priestly euds, the raw material o history or dreams.”2 he divine signiicance o numbers is personiied by the goddess Seshat, as the “Enumerator” or “he Lady o Builders.”3 he Hymn ound in the Leiden Papyrus  I350 (Old Kingdom 2686-2134 BCE) demonstrates that number symbolism has been practiced since ancient times: “he Leiden Papyrus consists o an extended composition describing the principal aspects o the ancient creation narratives. he system o numeration in the Papyrus identiies the principle/aspect o creation and matches each one with its symbolic number.”4  Ancient Egyptians understood that everything in the universe is animated by lie orces. hereore, each particle is in constant movement and has interactions due to the eect o these lie orces. hese principles  were called neteru (gods/goddesses). Numbers designated these energetic aspects o nature. Consequently, the entire universe is animated and vibrant, and each acet is considered either “male” or “emale.”  We can deduce the sense o living  interactions by the expressions used in the Rhind Mathematical Papyrus (ca. 1650 BCE):

Vesica Piscis with igures within

“I go three times into the hekat (a bushel, unit o volume), a seventh o me is added to me and I return ully satisied.” 5 he same Papyrus also recommends that there are “Rules or enquiring into nature and or knowing  all that exists, every mystery, every secret.”6

 Ancient Egyptians understood that everything in the universe is animated by lie orces. Tereore, each particle is in constant movement and has interactions due to the eect o  these lie orces. he concept o the relationships between 3, 4, and 5 is as ancient as Egypt, and as old as the Great Pyramid o Giza. his powerul, magniicent structure conceals deeply mystical traditions that only recently have begun to be recognized by archeological research.  We know today exactly why the relationships between the number 3, 4, and 5 are so important, but it was a well-kept secret in ancient times. “Since the Pythagoreans considered the irst ten numbers to be seed patterns or all the principles o the cosmos, a geometer needs only create their shapes to model all the universal rhythms. he irst three shapes to emerge rom the vesica piscis , the triangle, square and pentagon (3, 4, 5) orm the only relationship, or ratios, required to generate all the rest (except or sevenness). hese relationships called the square roots … are expressible not as whole numbers but Page xli 

as never-ending decimals...these ongoing  relationships hold the structural pattern or all numbers and shapes that ollow.”7 he classical numbers 3, 4, 5 are represented in the very structure o the pyramid. he Great Pyramid o Giza was built in approximately 2560 BCE, at the time o the Old Kingdom: • “ThenumberOneisthewhole structure itsel. • The triangular faces represent the number 3. • Thesquarebaseisthenumber4 and inally  • The four corners plus its apex complete the number 5.”8

“he upright, thereore, may be likened to the male, the base to the emale, and the hypotenuse to the child o both, and so Ausar  [Osiris] may be regarded as the origin, Auset  [Isis] as the recipient, and Heru  [Horus] as perected result.”9 he short side o the right angle triangle is named “Ausar,” which corresponds to Osiris, the Father. he longer side is named “Auset,” corresponding to Isis, the Mother.  And inally, the hypotenuse is called “Heru,” or Horus, the Son.10

The Egyptian Triangle From this image the constant relationships between the One, as the  whole structure and 3-4-5 as its indivisible components are clearly shown. hese numbers had a proound mystical symbolism that becomes explicit in the explanations related to the Pythagorean triangle. he Egyptian 3-4-5 triangle is irst described by Plutarch in Moralia Vol. V :

Rosicrucian Digest No. 1 2009

Pythagorean riangle with Egyptian Attributions. Figures ©2007 by Je Dahl/Wikimedia Commons.

hese names were assigned according  to speciic criteria: the upright side (3) is likened to the “male,” the Father Osiris. he horizontal base (4) is related to the “emale,” the Mother Isis, and the hypotenuse (5) corresponds to the Son, Horus. he irst is the “origin,” the second is the “recipient,” and the Son is the “result.”11  As Plutarch describes: “hree is the irst perect odd number: our is a square whose side is the even number two; but ive is in some ways like to its ather, and in some  ways like to its mother, being made up o  three and two. And panta , (all), is a derivative o  pente (ive), and they speak o counting as ‘numbering by ives.’ Five makes a square o itsel.”12 Pythagoras’s Contribution

H. Spencer Lewis and the AMORC Egyptian Expedition on the Giza Plateau, 1929. Photo rom the Rosicrucian  Archives ©1929.

Page xlii 

Pythagoras’s contribution (sixth century  BCE) consisted in translating this concept

he Pythagorean heorem: a 2 + b2 = c2

into the mathematical statement (as we would  write it today) a 2 + b2 = c2, in which the square o the hypotenuse o a right triangle is equal to the sum o the squares on the other two sides. Pythagoras spread this notion by means o his teachings at the school o  Crotona in southern Italy. he geometrical and mathematical demonstration o the Pythagorean theorem is explained by sacred geometrician Robert Lawlor in relation to the gnomonic expansion.13 “he contemplation o this igure leads to an understanding o one o nature’s most common orms o growth, growth by  accretion or accumulative increase, in which the old orm is contained within the new. his is the way the more permanent tissues o  the animal body, such as bones, teeth, horns and shells develop, in contrast to the sot tissue which is discarded and replaced. “his method o iguring the gnomon shows its relationships to the Pythagorean ormula. Shown here is the gnomonic increase rom the square surace area o 4 to the

Gnomonic Expansion related to the Pythagorean heorem.

square o 5, where the gnomon o the larger square 5 is equal to 1/4 o the initial square o 4. “Kepler, the amous astronomer and ormulator o the laws o planetary motion, stated: ‘Geometry has two great treasures: one is the theorem o Pythagoras, the other is the division o a line into mean and extreme ratios, that is phi , the Golden Mean. he irst may be compared to a measure o gold, the second to a precious jewel.’”14 The Egyptian Alchemical Triangle Egyptian concepts o number symbolism  were popularized in the West and later became classic ormulas among medieval cathedral builders.

Egyptian Alchemical riangle

he alchemists also elaborated their theories using the same triangle. hey  assumed that the whole igure represented the all-pervasive First Matter. he vertical side named by Osiris represented the three vital principles: Salt, Sulur, and Mercury. he long horizontal side named by Isis was the expression o the our basic elements: Fire, Water, Air, and Earth. Finally, the hypotenuse named by Horus showed ive divisions, representing the ive stages o  the development o Lie: Minerals, Plants,  Animals, Humans, and Enlightened Ones.15 he essential eature or the alchemist  was that the diagram relected the vibrations o Spirit maniesting as Matter. From the First Matter, related to Osiris, Lie maniested by  means o the our elements, into the physical Page xliii 

 world o minerals, vegetation, animals, completes the Great Work by becoming one  with the Father, even as the line o Horus in and humans. he ive sections demonstrated the this triangle, completes itsel by arriving at the 16 theoretical distance separating the dierent point whence the line o Osiris descends.” he line o Osiris shows three alchemical realms. One ith is the evolution rom mineral to plant, one ith rom plant to divisions: animal, one ith rom animal to human, but • The first division of the Osiris the true ulillment o the ull humanity needs line corresponds to Mercury, since the last ith o the scale to be completed. this represents the higher consciousness—pure knowing—which is the irst emanation rom the one source Te concept o the relationships o being.17 between 3, 4, and 5 is as ancient • TheseconddivisionoftheOsiris as Egypt, and as old as the Great line shows the symbol o Sulur. Pyramid o Giza. Tis powerul, Sulur is related to sel-consciousness. magnifcent structure conceals deeply   With respect to this symbol, Bernard revisan reminds us: “Gold is nothing  mystical traditions that only recently  else but quicksilver congealed by  have begun to be recognized by  its Sulur.”18 archeological research. • Thethirddivisionofthevertical line is represented by the symbol o  Salt. he basis o the Great Work is he distance separating the evolution balance. By its symmetry, the symbol o plant to human is the same as the one o Salt represents the ancient adage, needed by an average human being to attain “As Above, So Below.”19 the high level o an adept. Similarly, the he line o Isis shows our alchemical neophyte, aspiring to become an adept, has a diicult road to climb beore coming close divisions. hey are the well known symbolical to the vertex, or highest point that represents elements that are the building blocks o all maniestation: Fire, Air, Water, and Earth. the desired union with the Divine. he alchemist considered this diagram as a teaching tool or explaining the rules o discipline, meditation, renunciation, and silence that were imposed on the aspirants beore they were considered ready or the most sacred and proound teachings. his same diagram also indicated the need to be humble and patient, since the irst steps on the path did not justiy a superiority  o the neophyte over an ordinary human being. Only a long and serious preparation  would permit true ulillment o the desired union with the Divine: “Above the natural human being is the he Christ in a Vesica Piscis o Light: The Transfiguration Rosicrucian one who has made himsel [or hersel] the of Christ . From an iconostasis in the Constantinople Digest style, mid-twelth century, Saint Catherine’s Monastery, subject o the Great Work, who is adept, No. 1 Sinai (Egypt). master and Magus. he Human being who 2009 Page xliv 

Te shape o the human eye itsel  is a Vesica Piscis. Te spiritual signifcance o “seeing eye to eye” to the “mirror o the soul” was highly  regarded by numerous Renaissance artists who used this orm extensively  in art and architecture.

he iveold symmetry o the hypotenuse symbolizes the development o lie in its evolution toward the Light. It is related to the basic aspects o the ourold symmetry o  elemental nature represented by the line o Isis. he process described by sacred geometer Robert Lawlor can be summarized succinctly: “at the origin and end all dierentiation merges toward unity.” An object a  and its human perceiver b are contained within an all-pervasive unity, that can be symbolized by the number 1. his can be expressed by  the ormula: a:b = b:1, in which the object is related to the human, as the human is related to the whole.20 Lawlor suggests that this is a proportion upon which the “experience” o knowledge can be ormulated and that this is “the goal o dynamic meditation.”21

he Vesica Piscis is ormed by the intersection o two circles or spheres whose centers intersect in such a way that each center’s circle lies on the circumerence o  the other circle. It was known in the early  civilizations o Mesopotamia, Arica, and  Asia, and requently used in Christian iconography. It is revealed in the construction o ancient doors and portals.23 “It has been the subject o mystical speculation at several periods o history, perhaps irst among the Pythagoreans. he mathematical ratio o its width (measured to the endpoints o the ‘body,’ not including  the ‘tail’) to its height was reportedly believed by them to be 265:153 (namely 1.73203...). he geometric ratio o these dimensions is actually the square root o 3, or 1.73205... (since i straight lines are drawn connecting  the centers o the two circles with each other, with the two points where the circles intersect, two equilateral triangles join along an edge). he ratio 265:153 is an approximation to the square root o 3, with the property that no better approximation can be obtained with smaller whole numbers.”24

The Profound Secret of the Pythagorean School he proound secrets o the Pythagorean School can now be discussed in simple diagrams. We can consider this as a graphic demonstration o the Divine Light embedded into the human body. he explanation must begin by showing the square root o 3, or the Vesica Piscis (Latin: “bladder o a ish”).22

Hindu Goddess Kali and God Bhairava in Union in a Vesica Piscis , 18th century. Watercolor rom Nepal, git o Dr. and Mrs. Robert S. Coles to Los Angeles County Museum o Art

Page xlv 

Platonic Solids and other images contained in Metatron’s Cube, created by Sloth Monkey/Wikimedia Commons

Modern researchers have commented on the signiicance o this deeply symbolic orm: “his symbolic intersection represents the ‘common ground,’ ‘shared vision,’ or ‘mutual understanding’ between equal individuals. he shape o the human eye itsel is a Vesica  Piscis. he spiritual signiicance o ‘seeing eye to eye’ to the ‘mirror o the soul’ was highly  regarded by numerous Renaissance artists  who used this orm extensively in art and architecture. he ratio o the axes o the orm is the square root o 3, which alludes to the deepest nature o the triune which cannot be adequately expressed by rational language alone.”25 “his almond space is the crucible o the creating process.”26 “he irst three shapes to emerge rom the vesica piscis, the triangle, square and pentagon (3,4,5) orm the only relationship, or ratios, required to generate all the rest

Rosicrucian Digest No. 1 2009

Metatron’s Cube

Page xlvi 

(except or sevenness)...these ongoing  relationships hold the structural pattern or all numbers and shapes that ollow.”27 The Metatron Cube Understanding the ratios o the triangle, square, and pentagon permits us to grasp the importance o a more complex igure, such as the Metatron’s Cube, which contains twodimensional images o the Platonic Solids 28 and many other primal orms.29 he two large triangles orm a hexagram that is symbolic o the harmony o the opposites. One triangle points downwards and one points upward. his is popularly called the Star of David  and is symbolic o ininite celestial light. We can imagine that this light is all pervasive and circumscribes everything  and every orm inside it. he diagram shows that this ininite light is also maniested light, as it is symbolically included in a hexagon, a  six sided igure. In Qabala, six is the number o the sephira ipereth, and thereore this hexagon represents the beauty and spiritual love maniested in the natural universe. At irst glance, we can perceive that the whole universe is permeated by this well balanced divine light symbolizing peace and harmony. Inside, at the very core o the construction  we can detect another pentagon in which a pentagram is inscribed. he pentagram is the symbol o humanity maniested, as many  traditions relate ive to the human person. In the Metetron’s Cube, the central circle is white and empty, but we can easily  mentally draw another hexagram inside it using the points where the surrounding 

Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa, Image o a human body in a pentagram rom Libri Tres de Occulta Philosophia , 153133. Symbols o the sun and moon are in center, while the other ive classical “planets” are around the edge.

circles touch each other. he symbolism o  this inner balance o opposites maniests the potentiality o the human beings o bringing  to shine inside themselves the same Light o  Peace and Harmony that surrounds them: “Horus is above me, at my right side, at my let side, Horus is in ront o me, behind me, below me Horus is everywhere around me, Horus is inside me.”30

systematic maniestations o natural laws. his proves that the early thinkers did not look on lie as being illed with accidental occurrences and uncontrolled; rather they  are a Divine or perect scheme o supreme conception.”31 he images we have described in this brie introduction, and many others derived rom these mystical proportions are always available or our meditation and inspiration. heir power is undiminished over the centuries, and concentration upon them as mandalas can yield deep insights. As the spirit o Pythagoras is very much alive in the Rosicrucian Order, we can ind in these “images as mandalas” a path or discovery  o the supreme conception o the cosmic  whole, which is a perect scheme in which everything is in order, and is beautiul, both above and below.

 A Divine Scheme of Supreme Conception H. Spencer Lewis, ormer AMORC Imperator, wrote: “ime has proven that many o these ideas were correctly ormed.... I we agree with the early philosophers that the whole universe can be explained according to geometrical laws and principles, then, we should not be surprised to ind the numbers to have a  peculiar signiicance, as Pythagoras taught. “It is quite evident that the earliest thinkers were determined to ind law and order and a mathematical basis or the

H. Spencer Lewis and his wie Martha on the AMORC Grand our o Egypt, 1937. Photo rom the Rosicrucian  Archives ©1937.

Page xlvii 

EndnotEs 1See works o René Schwaller de Lubicz, especially 

 A Study of Numbers: a Guide to the Constant  Creation of the Universe  (Rochester V: Inner raditions, 1986); The Temple of Man: Apet of    the South at Luxor , 2 vols (Rochester V: Inner raditions, 1998). 2 John Anthony West, Serpent in the Sky  (New   York: he Julian Press, 1987), 42, 44. See also Carmen Blacker and Michael Loewe, eds.; with contributions by J.M. Plumley et al.,  Ancient  Cosmologies (London: Allen & Unwin, 1975), 24. 3Moustaa Gadalla, The Egyptian Sacred  Numerology , published online at:  www.egypttehuti.org/articles/sacred-numerology.html. 4Ibid. 5Ibid. 6Ibid. 7Michael S. Schneider,  A Beginner’s Guide  to Constructing the Universe  (New York: HarperCollins 1994), 35. 8Paul Foster Case, The Esoteric Keys of Alchemy  (Vancouver: Ishtar Publishing, 1932), 54. 9Plutarch, “On Isis and Osiris,” 56 Moralia Book  5. ranslated by Moustaa Gadalla, The Egyptian Sacred Numerology . See endnote 3. 10riangle and discussion ater description in Moustaa Gadalla, The Egyptian Sacred  Numerology . See endnote 3. 11Ibid. 12Plutarch, “On Isis and Osiris,” 56 Moralia Book  5. ranslated by Moustaa Gadalla, The Egyptian Sacred Numerology . See endnote 3.

Rosicrucian Digest No. 1 2009 Page xlviii 

13Robert

Lawlor, Sacred Geometry, Philosophy and  Practice  (London: hames and Hudson, 1982), 64. Image based on description by Lawlor. 14Ibid., 53, 64. 15riangle image and discussion rom a description in Case, Esoteric Keys , 55. 16Ibid. 17Ibid., 79. 18Bernard revisan, quoted in Case, Esoteric Keys , 85. 19Case, Esoteric Keys , 93 20See Lawlor, Sacred Geometry , 42, 46. 21Ibid., 46. 22Bruce Rawles, Sacred Geometry  home page,  www.geometrycode.com/sg/index.shtml. 23Ibid. 24“Vesica Pisces” at Wikipedia , http://en.wikipedia. org/wiki/Vesica_piscis. 25Rawles, Sacred Geometry home page. 26Schneider, Beginner’s Guide , 32. 27Ibid., 35. 28See “Platonic Solids,” at Wikipedia , http:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Platonic_solids. 29Rawles, Sacred Geometry home page. 30 Julie Scott, Grand Master o the English Grand Lodge o AMORC, during meditation in Egypt, December 2008. 31H. Spencer Lewis, “Mystical Numbers” in Essays  of a Modern Mystic , 6th ed. (San Jose: Rosicrucian Order, AMORC, 1978), 171.

View more...

Comments

Copyright ©2017 KUPDF Inc.
SUPPORT KUPDF