6.1-Busbar protection.pdf

6.1 BusBar protection

6.1 BusBar protection

BUSBAR PROTECTION

BUSBAR PROTECTION

Ref : APP14

Ref : APP14

Issue B1 Last Release : October 2010

Issue B1 Last Release : October 2010

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Program g

Program g

PART 1 : GENERALITY

PART 1 : GENERALITY

PART 2 : OPERATING PRINCIPLES

PART 2 : OPERATING PRINCIPLES

PART 3 : OTHER SUBSTATION TOPOLOGIES

PART 3 : OTHER SUBSTATION TOPOLOGIES

Advantages / Disadvantages

Advantages / Disadvantages

PART 4 : HIGH IMPEDANCE DIFFERENTIAL PROTECTION –

PART 4 : HIGH IMPEDANCE DIFFERENTIAL PROTECTION –

PRINCIPLE

PRINCIPLE

PART 5 : LOW IMPEDANCE PROTECTION – PRINCIPLE

PART 5 : LOW IMPEDANCE PROTECTION – PRINCIPLE

PART 6 : FRAME LEAKAGE PROTECTION - PRINCIPLE

PART 6 : FRAME LEAKAGE PROTECTION - PRINCIPLE

PART 7 : BLOCKING SCHEME PROTECTION

PART 7 : BLOCKING SCHEME PROTECTION

PART 8 : OTHER APPLICATIONS

PART 8 : OTHER APPLICATIONS

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

2

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

2

PART 1 : Generality

PART 1 : Generality

PART 2 : Operating Principle

PART 2 : Operating Principle

PART 3 : Other Substation Topologies

PART 3 : Other Substation Topologies

Advantages / Disadvantages

Advantages / Disadvantages

PART 4 : High Impedance Differential

PART 4 : High Impedance Differential

p Protection – Principle

p Protection – Principle

PART 5 : Low Impedance Protection – Principle

PART 5 : Low Impedance Protection – Principle

PART 6 : F Frame L Leakage k P Protection t ti - Principle Pi i l

PART 6 : F Frame L Leakage k P Protection t ti - Principle Pi i l

PART 7 : Blocking Scheme Protection

PART 7 : Blocking Scheme Protection

PART 8 : Other Applications

PART 8 : Other Applications 3

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Busbar protection

Busbar protection

Objective : Clear a fault inside a substation as quickly as possible

A

Objective : Clear a fault inside a substation as quickly as possible

B

A

C

To Protect : - The operator and workers - HV equipment - Global Network Stability Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

3

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

B

C

To Protect : - The operator and workers - HV equipment - Global Network Stability 4

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

4

Busbar protection

Busbar protection

Zone protected by distance protection

Zone protected by distance protection

XX

XX

21

21

X

X

X

X

Zone p protected By the Transformer Differential protection

X

The final protection method will depend on the substation topology and complexity

XX

87T

X

X

Zone p protected By the Transformer Differential protection

Zone protected By the busbar protection X

Zone protected By the busbar protection

The final protection method will depend on the substation topology and complexity

XX

87T

X

X

The distance protection will see a busbar fault in reverse zone ( time delayed ) the transformer differential protection will not see the busbar fault, except by back-up protection

The distance protection will see a busbar fault in reverse zone ( time delayed ) the transformer differential protection will not see the busbar fault, except by back-up protection 5

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Busbar protection B1

5

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Busbar protection B2

B1 Zone 1

L1

Zone 1

L1

Zone 2

X

B2

Zone 2

X

L2

L2

X

X

L3

L3 X

X

L4

L4

X

X

L5

L5 X

X

X

X

C Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

C 6

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

6

Differential Protection

Differential Protection

● When a differential protection is recommended ?

● When a differential protection is recommended ?

● The grading between overcurrent protections is difficult to guarantee or impossible

● The grading between overcurrent protections is difficult to guarantee or impossible

● The max clearance time is critical for HV equipment or network stability ● Applicable for :

● The max clearance time is critical for HV equipment or network stability ● Applicable for :

● Generators, ● Transformers, Transformers ● Overhead lines, ● Underground cables, ● busbars, ● Motors. Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

● Generators, ● Transformers, Transformers ● Overhead lines, ● Underground cables, ● busbars, ● Motors. 7

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Busbar Faults Are Usually Permanent

Busbar Faults Are Usually Permanent

Causes of Busbar Faults :

Causes of Busbar Faults :

● Falling debris

● Falling debris

● Insulation failures

● Insulation failures

● Circuit breaker failures

● Circuit breaker failures

● Current transformer failures

● Current transformer failures

● Isolators switchs operated on load or outside their ratings

● Isolators switchs operated on load or outside their ratings

● Safety earths left connected

● Safety earths left connected

Therefore :

Therefore :

● Circuit breakers should be tripped and locked out by busbar protection ( l i mustt b (reclosing be d done after ft installation i t ll ti check) h k)

● Circuit breakers should be tripped and locked out by busbar protection ( l i mustt b (reclosing be d done after ft installation i t ll ti check) h k)

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

8

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

7

8

Busbar Protection must be

Busbar Protection must be

●

●

RELIABLE ● Failure to trip could cause widespread damage to the substation

●

● Failure to trip could cause widespread damage to the substation

STABLE

●

● False tripping can cause widespread interruption of supplies to possible p power system y instability y customers / p

●

DISCRIMINATING

●

DISCRIMINATING ● Should Sh ld ttrip i th the minimum i i number b off b breakers k tto clear l th the ffault lt

FAST

●

● To limit damage and possible power system instability Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

STABLE ● False tripping can cause widespread interruption of supplies to possible p power system y instability y customers / p

● Should Sh ld ttrip i th the minimum i i number b off b breakers k tto clear l th the ffault lt

●

RELIABLE

FAST ● To limit damage and possible power system instability

9

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Protection Methods

Protection Methods

● Differential Protection

● Differential Protection

● High Impedance ● Low Impedance ● Medium Impedance with Bias Characteristic (no more used)

● High Impedance ● Low Impedance ● Medium Impedance with Bias Characteristic (no more used)

● Frame Leakage Protection (Detection of leakage currents)

● Frame Leakage Protection (Detection of leakage currents)

● Directional Comparison Protection (Blocking Scheme)

● Directional Comparison Protection (Blocking Scheme)

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

9

10

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

10

PART 1 : Generality

PART 1 : Generality

PART 2 : Operating Principle

PART 2 : Operating Principle

PART 3 : Other Substation Topologies

PART 3 : Other Substation Topologies

Advantages / Disadvantages

Advantages / Disadvantages

PART 4 : High Impedance Differential

PART 4 : High Impedance Differential

Protection – Principle

Protection – Principle

PART 5 : Low Impedance Protection – Principle

PART 5 : Low Impedance Protection – Principle

PART 6 : Frame Leakage Protection - Principle

PART 6 : Frame Leakage Protection - Principle

PART 7 : Blocking g Scheme Protection

PART 7 : Blocking g Scheme Protection

PART 8 : Other Applications

PART 8 : Other Applications 11

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Biased Differential Scheme I2

I1

Biased Differential Scheme I2

I1

I1 - I2

Differential Current

I2

I1

I1 - I2

Differential Current

HI

I1 - I2

11

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

I1 - I2

Differential Current

LI

I1 - I2

I1 - I2

Differential Current

HI

I1 - I2

LI

I1 - I2

Trip

Trip

no Trip

no Trip

Trip

Trip

no Trip

no Trip

Mean Through I + I 2 1 Current Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

I2

I1

2

Mean Through I + I 2 1 Current

2

12

Mean Through I + I 2 1 Current Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

2

Mean Through I + I 2 1 Current

2

12

Biased Differential Scheme Differential Current

Biased Differential Scheme Differential Current

I1 - I2

I1 - I2

Trip

Trip

no Trip

no Trip

Mean Through Current

Mean Through Current

I1 + I2

I1 + I2

2

2

13

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Biased Differential Scheme Differential Current

13

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Biased Differential Scheme Differential Current

I1 - I2

Trip

Trip

no Trip

Differential Current

I1 + I2

Mean Through Current

I1 + I2 2

no Trip

Mean Through Current

I1 + I2

Differential Current

I1 + I2

Mean Through Current

I1 + I2 2

2

Differential Current = 2 X Mean Through Current Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

I1 - I2

Mean Through Current

I1 + I2 2

Differential Current = 2 X Mean Through Current 14

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

14

Protective Zone definitions

Protective Zone definitions

Bus Section / Bus Disconnector

Bus Section / Bus Disconnector

BS

BS

Z Zone 1

Zone 2

Z Zone 1

Zone 2

Zone 3

Zone 4

Zone 3

Zone 4

BC1

BC2

F1

F2

F3

BC1

F4

F1

15

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

No Busbar Protection

F3

F4

15

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

●Advantages

F1

● There are fewer faults on busbars than on other parts of the power system. ● No risk of dislocation of system due to accidental operation of busbar protection.

F2

●Drawbacks

F1

F2

●Drawbacks

● Slow fault clearance. Busbar faults at F1 and F2 are cleared by remote t time ti delayed d l d protection t ti on circuits i it feeding the faults: Time Delayed Overcurrent or Time Delayed Distance Protection (Zone 2) Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

F2

No Busbar Protection

●Advantages ● There are fewer faults on busbars than on other parts of the power system. ● No risk of dislocation of system due to accidental operation of busbar protection.

BC2

● Slow fault clearance. Busbar faults at F1 and F2 are cleared by remote t time ti delayed d l d protection t ti on circuits i it feeding the faults: Time Delayed Overcurrent or Time Delayed Distance Protection (Zone 2) 16

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

16

With Busbar Protection ZONE

● Fast clearance by tripping of all breakers at the busbars

● Fast Tripping but only for the Cirscuit breakers of the selectied zone

With Busbar Protection F1

ZONE 1

ZONE 2 F1

F2

17

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

With Busbar Protection 1/2

SS 1

SS 2

87BB

● Fast Tripping but only for the Cirscuit breakers of the selectied zone

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

F1

ZONE 1

ZONE 2 F1

F2

17

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

With Busbar Protection 1/2

SS 3

SS 1

SS 2

87BB

87BB

21

ZONE

● Fast clearance by tripping of all breakers at the busbars

SS 3

87BB

21

21

18

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

21

18

With Busbar Protection

With Busbar Protection

2/2

2/2

21

87BB

87BB

87BB

87BB

21

21

19

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Without Busbar Protection

21

19

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Without Busbar Protection

1/2

1/2

21

21

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

21

21

21

21

21

20

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

21

21

21

20

Without Busbar Protection

Without Busbar Protection

2/2

2/2

21

21

21

21

21

21

21

With Busbar protection

21 Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

21

21

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

With Busbar protection

87BB

87BB

87BB

87BB

21

21

Without Busbar protection p

21

21

21

21

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

21

21

21

Without Busbar protection p

21

21

21

21 22

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

21

21

21 22

PART 1 : Generality

PART 1 : Generality

PART 2 : Operating Principle

PART 2 : Operating Principle

PART 3 : Other Substation Topologies Advantages / Disadvantages

PART 3 : Other Substation Topologies Advantages / Disadvantages

PART 4 : High Impedance Differential

PART 4 : High Impedance Differential

Protection – Principle p

Protection – Principle p

PART 5 : Low Impedance Protection – Principle

PART 5 : Low Impedance Protection – Principle

PART 6 : Frame Leakage Protection - Principle

PART 6 : Frame Leakage Protection - Principle

PART 7 : Blocking Scheme Protection

PART 7 : Blocking Scheme Protection

PART 8 : Other Applications

PART 8 : Other Applications 23

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Topology & Architecture of the HV network and HV subtations Single breaker - Single bus

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

23

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Topology & Architecture of the HV network and HV subtations Single breaker - Single bus

Most basic, simple and economical bus design design.

Most basic, simple and economical bus design design.

Main use : - distribution, - lower transmission voltages

Main use : - distribution, - lower transmission voltages

Drawback : - Lack of flexibility for bus faults - maintenance

Drawback : - Lack of flexibility for bus faults - maintenance

Generaly G l nott protected t t d by b a busbar protection if one or two infeeds exist.

Generaly G l nott protected t t d by b a busbar protection if one or two infeeds exist.

24

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

24

Topology & Architecture of the HV network and HV subtations Single S g e buses co connected ected with t bus ttie e

Topology & Architecture of the HV network and HV subtations Single S g e buses co connected ected with t bus ttie e

Generally used when a large number of circuits exist.

Generally used when a large number of circuits exist.

Main use : - Distribution networks, - Industrial substations with or without co-generation.

Main use : - Distribution networks, - Industrial substations with or without co-generation.

Advantages : - Flexibility, specially when the substation is fed by two separate t power supplies li (generators). - A bus fault only causes the loss of half a bar

Advantages : - Flexibility, specially when the substation is fed by two separate t power supplies li (generators). - A bus fault only causes the loss of half a bar

25

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

25

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Double breaker - Double bus

2 Busbars ; 2 Circuit Breakers

2 Busbars ; 2 Circuit Breakers

Drawback : - The line p protection must be connected to both CTs. Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

X

X

X

Advantage : - Increased operating flexibility, - Both busbars are independent, specially from a protection point of view. view - All switch disconectors are normally closed and no bus couplor is used. - The loss of one bus dos not affect th transmitted the t itt d power.

X

Generally used in HV substations (500 kV)

X

X

X

X

X

X

Double breaker - Double bus

Generally used in HV substations (500 kV) Advantage : - Increased operating flexibility, - Both busbars are independent, specially from a protection point of view. view - All switch disconectors are normally closed and no bus couplor is used. - The loss of one bus dos not affect th transmitted the t itt d power. Drawback : - The line p protection must be connected to both CTs.

26

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

26

Main and transfer buses with single breaker

Main and transfer buses with single breaker

Main

Main

Reserve / Transfer By-pass Isolator

Reserve / Transfer By-pass Isolator

By-pass Isolator

27

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Main and transfer buses with single breaker

27

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Main and transfer buses with single breaker

Main

Main

Reserve T Transfer f

By-pass Isolator

Reserve Transfer CB

Transfer CB

T Transfer f

Be carefull to the CT ocation on the Bus Transfer, in order to clearly defined the protected zone Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Transfer CB

Transfer CB

Be carefull to the CT ocation on the Bus Transfer, in order to clearly defined the protected zone 28

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

28

Breaker and a half bus arrangement

Breaker and a half bus arrangement

Widely used for larger multicircuit and higher voltage systems

Widely used for larger multicircuit and higher voltage systems

Advantage : - High flexibility flexibility, - Line faults trip two circuit breakers but does not cause loss of services of other lines and busbars.

Advantage : - High flexibility flexibility, - Line faults trip two circuit breakers but does not cause loss of services of other lines and busbars.

87

87

Zone to protect separately

Zone to protect separately

87

87

29

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Other Busbar Topologies

Other Busbar Topologies Common for Higher voltages (US) No busbar

OHL FEEDER

X

X

X

Drawback : - If the ring is opened, a fault on a line y separate p the other lines and the may bus. Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

OHL FEEDER

X

Advantage : - One circuit breaker for two lines, - No busbar is required (not applicable) as the bus protection is already performed by the line protection themselves. - The ring can be opened without loss of power.

X

X

Advantage : - One circuit breaker for two lines, - No busbar is required (not applicable) as the bus protection is already performed by the line protection themselves. - The ring can be opened without loss of power.

Ring Bus

X

Ring Bus Common for Higher voltages (US) No busbar

29

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Drawback : - If the ring is opened, a fault on a line y separate p the other lines and the may bus.

TRANSF. FEEDER

30

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

TRANSF. FEEDER

30

Mesh Busbar

F1

Mesh Busbar

F3

F1

F3

T1

T3

T1

T3

T4

T2

T4

T2

F4

F2

F4 31

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Mesh Busbar Protection 87 R1

F1

F2 31

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Mesh Busbar Protection F3

87 R1

87 R3

F1

F3 87 R3

T1

T3

T1

T3

T4

T2

T4

T2

87 R4

87 R2

F4 Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

87 R4

F2

87 R2

F4 32

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

F2 32

Importance of CT Location and Number

Importance of CT Location and Number

33

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Effect of CT location on the global P t ti Performance Protection P f

33

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Effect of CT location on the global P t ti Performance Protection P f

Bus

Bus

Feeder Protection Feeder Protection Bus Protection Bus Protection

CT Overlap

Feeder Protection

51 Feeder Protection

Bus Protection Bus Protection

All CTs on Bus side

CT Overlap

Feeder Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Feeder Protection

Bus Protection

51

All CT CTs on liline side id

51 Feeder Protection Bus Protection

51

All CT CTs on liline side id

All CTs on Bus side

Feeder 34

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

34

PART 1 : Generality

PART 1 : Generality

PART 2 : Operating Principle

PART 2 : Operating Principle

PART 3 : Other Substation Topologies p g

PART 3 : Other Substation Topologies p g

Advantages / Disadvantages

Advantages / Disadvantages

PART 4 : High Impedance Differential

PART 4 : High Impedance Differential

Protection – Principle

Protection – Principle

PART 5 : Low Impedance Protection – Principle

PART 5 : Low Impedance Protection – Principle

PART 6 : Frame Leakage Protection - Principle

PART 6 : Frame Leakage Protection - Principle

PART 7 : Blocking Scheme Protection

PART 7 : Blocking Scheme Protection

PART 8 : Other Applications

35

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Single Bus Substation

PART 8 : Other Applications

35

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Single Bus Substation

P1

S1

P1

S1

P1

S1

P1

S1

P1

S1

P1

S1

P2

S2

P2

S2

P2

S2

P2

S2

P2

S2

P2

S2

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

36

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

36

Single Bus Substation

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Single Bus Substation

37

Single Bus Substation

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

37

Single Bus Substation

38

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

38

Single Bus Substation

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Single Bus Substation

39

Double Bus Substation

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

39

Double Bus Substation

40

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

40

Double Bus Substation

Double Bus Substation Bus A

Bus A

Bus B

Bus B

P1 S1

P1 S1

P2 S2

P2 S2

P1

S1

P1

S1

P1

S1

P2 S2

P1

S1

P1

S1

P1

S1

P2 S2

P2

S2

P2

S2

P2

S2

P1 S1

P2

S2

P2

S2

P2

S2

P1 S1

a b

Current

41

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Double Bus Substation

a b

Double Bus Substation Bus A

Bus B

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

41

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Bus A

a b

Current

Bus B

Current

42

a b

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Current

42

Double Bus Substation

Double Bus Substation Bus A

Bus A

Bus B

Bus B

Current

a b

43

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Double Bus Substation

Double Bus Substation Bus A

Bus B

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

43

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Bus A

a b

Current

a b

Bus B

Current

44

a b

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Current

44

Double Bus Substation

Double Bus Substation Bus A

Bus A

Bus B

Bus B

Current

a b

45

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Double Bus Substation

Double Bus Substation Bus A

Bus B

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

45

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Bus A

a b

Current

a b

Bus B

Current

46

a b

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Current

46

Double Bus Substation

Double Bus Substation Bus A

Bus A

Bus B

Bus B

Tripping a b a Current b

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Tripping a b a Current b

47

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Double Bus Substation

Double Bus Substation

●Interposing CTs are not acceptable

●Interposing CTs are not acceptable

● Main CT must be identical ● Current C t switching it hi via i auxilliary illi relay l iis nott acceptable. t bl ● Requirement of number of position contact (Disconnector switch) is high

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

47

● Main CT must be identical ● Current C t switching it hi via i auxilliary illi relay l iis nott acceptable. t bl ● Requirement of number of position contact (Disconnector switch) is high

48

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

48

Double Bus Substation

Double Bus Substation

●No auxiliary contact must be used for current switching g

●No auxiliary contact must be used for current switching g

● Supplementary delay on current switching ● Reliabiliby

● Supplementary delay on current switching ● Reliabiliby

●Auxiliary relays must be designed so that :

●Auxiliary relays must be designed so that :

● They get closed before the bus disconnector is closed get open p after ● Theyy g the bus disconnection is open

● They get closed before the bus disconnector is closed yg get open p after ● They the bus disconnection is open

49

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Check Zone Supervision

Bus B

Bus B

Trip Bus A

Trip Bus B

Bus A

Trip Bus A

Bus A

Zone A Zone B

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Trip Bus B

Check Zone Supervision

49

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Zone A Zone B

50

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

50

Bus B

Bus B

Currentt C switching failure

Trip Bus B

Bus A

Trip Bus A

Bus A

Currentt C switching failure

Zone A Zone B

Zone A Zone B

False Tripping

False Tripping 51

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

51

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Check Zone Supervision

Bus B

Bus B

Trip Bus A

Trip Bus B

Bus A

Trip Bus A

Bus A

Zone A Zone B

Zone A Zone B

Check Zone

Check Zone 52

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Trip Bus B

Check Zone Supervision

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Trip Bus B

Check Zone Supervision

Trip Bus A

Check Zone Supervision

52

Check Zone Supervision

Bus B

Bus B

Trip Bus A

Trip Bus B

Bus A

Trip Bus A

Bus A

Zone A Zone B

Zone A Zone B

53

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

53

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Check Zone Supervision

Bus B

Bus B

Trip Bus A

Trip Bus B

Bus A

Trip Bus A

Bus A

Check Zone

Trip Bus B

Check Zone Supervision

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Trip Bus B

Check Zone Supervision

Check Zone 54

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

54

Protection Sensitivity

Protection Sensitivity

55

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Stability for External Faults RCT

2RL

M

2RL

A

ZM

Stability for External Faults RCT

RCT

ZM

2RL

M

2RL

A

ZM

RCT

RCT

ZM

RCT 2RL

2RL M

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

55

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

2RL

M RCT 56

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

2RL

RCT 56

External Fault with CT Saturation RCT

2RL

2RL

M

A

ZM

External Fault with CT Saturation

RCT

RCT

ZM=0

M

2RL

ZM=0

CT Saturation

2RL M

RCT

2RL

TC saturé

External Fault with CT Saturation RCT

2RL

2RL

M

57

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

External Fault with CT Saturation

RCT

RCT

2RL

RCT

RS

A

ZM=0

A

ZM

Stabilizing Resistance

ZM=0

Stabilizing Resistance

RCT

RCT 2RL

2RL M

2RL

M RCT

Saturated CT Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

2RL

M

RS ZM

RCT

TC saturé 57

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

RCT

Unwanted Tripping

RCT

CT Saturation

2RL

2RL

M

A

ZM

Unwanted Tripping

RCT

2RL

2RL

RCT

Saturated CT 58

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

58

Impact of CT Saturation - Remind

Impact of CT Saturation - Remind

High Increase

High Increase

of IM

VS

of IM

VS

Knee point Voltage

Knee point Voltage

Above Knee Point Voltage :

Small increase

Small increase

● IM increase highly

of IM

● => Zm zero

Above Knee Point Voltage : ● IM increase highly

of IM

can be considered equal to

● => Zm zero

IM

IM 59

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Impact of CT Saturation - Remind RC

2R

T

L

2R

RC

L

T

RS

ZM

59

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Impact of CT Saturation - Remind

VS

ZM

A

can be considered equal to

RC

2R

T

L

2R

RC

L

T

RS

ZM

VS

ZM

A

IM

IM

Before saturation

RC

2R

T

L

2R

RC

L

T

RS

ZM

Before saturation

A

VS

ZM=0

RC

2R

T

L

L

T

A

VS

ZM=0

During saturation IM

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

RC

RS

ZM

During saturation

2R

IM 60

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

60

Stability for Internal Fault RCT

2RL

2RL

M

Stability for Internal Fault RCT

RCT

2RL

RS ZM

RCT

A

ZM

RCT 2RL

RCT 2RL

2RL

2RL M

Vset

Vset

61

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Insulation requirements 2RL

Insulation requirements 2RL

M

61

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

RCT

RCT

2RL

ZM

RCT

A

ZM

RCT

ZM

RCT

2RL

RCT 2RL

M

2RL M

=> Very High Risk of Over Voltages across Protection Terminals

=> Very High Risk of Over Voltages across Protection Terminals Vset

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

RCT

RS

A

2RL

2RL

M

RS ZM

ZM

RCT

M

RCT

RCT

RS

A

ZM

2RL

M

Vset

62

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

62

Insulation requirements RCT

2RL

Insulation requirements 2RL

M

RCT

RCT

2RL

RS

A non linear resistance can be g required to limit the voltage across terminals (Secondary circuit withstand voltage)

RCT 2RL

ZM

A

ZM

A non linear resistance can be g required to limit the voltage across terminals (Secondary circuit withstand voltage)

RCT

M

2RL

M

RCT 2RL

63

2RL

saturation 2RL

M

63

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Internal Fault with CT

RCT

RCT

2RL

saturation

ZM=0

RCT

ZM=0

●To avoid a non-tripping of the protection:

● The relay must have fast detection and tripping ● CTs must be designed to avoid saturation for internal faults RCT

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

A

ZM

●To avoid a non-tripping of the protection:

● The relay must have fast detection and tripping ● CTs must be designed to avoid saturation for internal faults RCT

ZM = 0

M

2RL

M RS

A

2RL

2RL

M

RS ZM

RCT

Vset

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

RCT

ZM

M

Vset

Internal Fault with CT

RCT

RS

A

ZM

2RL

M

2RL

(TC “short-circuited" )

Vset 2RL

M RCT

64

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

ZM = 0 (TC “short-circuited" )

Vset 2RL

RCT

64

CT Wiring Supervision Requirements

CT Wiring Supervision Requirements

65

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

CT Wiring Supervision (2)

65

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

CT Wiring Supervision (2)

I1 CT1 V Super vision relay l

RST

I1

I2 R

ZM2

ZM3

I3

CT1

I4

V

ZM4

Super vision relay l

RR

RST

I2 R

ZM2

ZM3

RR I1

Voltage measured by supervision relay V  1 (R // Z M2 // Z M3 // Z M4 )

Voltage measured by supervision relay V  1 (R // Z M2 // Z M3 // Z M4 )

If supervision relay setting  VSP

If supervision relay setting  VSP

Out - of - balance current to operate the supervision relay

Out - of - balance current to operate the supervision relay

VSP V V V  SP  SP  SP R Z M2 Z M3 Z M3

 

Alarm is Generally time delayed (3 sec. sec typ.) typ )

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

I4

ZM4

I1

 

I3

VSP V V V  SP  SP  SP R Z M2 Z M3 Z M3

Alarm is Generally time delayed (3 sec. sec typ.) typ ) 66

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

66

Differential Relay Circuit

A B C N

Differential Relay Circuit Zone bus wires

95X

95X

Bus wire short contacts

95X Supervision relay

95

Stabilising resistors

v 87

Metrosil resistors 87

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

v

v 87

67

High Impedance Protection Synthesis

v 87

87

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

67

High Impedance Protection Synthesis

● Stability is entirely due to a stabilising resistor in the circuit.. ● It is a simple, simple reliable and circulating current scheme ● The CTs must have the same ratio & must be of high accuracy (low magnetizing current) - class X ● The Th CT knee k point i voltage l needs d to b be relatively l i l hi high h ● The magnetising current can desensitise the scheme ● The scheme can be very fast ● Isolator contacts are needed to switch the full CT secondary current between the zones. ● There are risks to open the secondary side of CTs ● Extending the scheme is quite simple (if CTs not too old) ● Metrosil and Buswire supervision is required ● Maintenance M i t rules l are strict ti t Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Supervision relay

Stabilising resistors

v 87

Bus wire short contacts

95X 95

v

Zone bus wires

95X

95X

Metrosil resistors

A B C N

● Stability is entirely due to a stabilising resistor in the circuit.. ● It is a simple, simple reliable and circulating current scheme ● The CTs must have the same ratio & must be of high accuracy (low magnetizing current) - class X ● The Th CT knee k point i voltage l needs d to b be relatively l i l hi high h ● The magnetising current can desensitise the scheme ● The scheme can be very fast ● Isolator contacts are needed to switch the full CT secondary current between the zones. ● There are risks to open the secondary side of CTs ● Extending the scheme is quite simple (if CTs not too old) ● Metrosil and Buswire supervision is required ● Maintenance M i t rules l are strict ti t 68

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

68

One Breaker and a Half Substation Requirements for the Tee zone

One Breaker and a Half Substation Requirements for the Tee zone

69

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

One and Half Circuit Breaker Systems Bus A P1 S1

S1

P1

S2

P2

P2 S2

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

One and Half Circuit Breaker Systems Bus B

P2

P1

S2

S1

69

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Bus A P1 S1

S1

P1

S2

P2

P2 S2

Bus B P2

P1

S2

S1

●Use of one additional Protection

●Use of one additional Protection

● High Impedance Differential relay ● Low Impedance Differential relay (3 winding transformer relay)

● High Impedance Differential relay ● Low Impedance Differential relay (3 winding transformer relay) 70

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

70

One and Half Circuit Breaker Systems Bus A

One and Half Circuit Breaker Systems Bus B

Bus A

71

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

One and Half Circuit Breaker Systems Bus A

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Bus B

71

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

One and Half Circuit Breaker Systems Bus B

Bus A

72

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Bus B

72

One and Half Circuit Breaker Systems Bus A

One and Half Circuit Breaker Systems Bus B

Bus A

73

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

One and Half Circuit Breaker Systems Bus A

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Bus B

73

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

One and Half Circuit Breaker Systems Bus B

Bus A

74

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Bus B

74

One and Half Circuit Breaker Systems

One and Half Circuit Breaker Systems

Bus A

Bus B

Bus A

75

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

One and Half Circuit Breaker Systems

Bus B

75

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

One and Half Circuit Breaker Systems

Bus A

Bus B

Bus A

Bus B

P1

P2

P2

P1

P1

P2

P2

P1

S1

S2

S2

S1

S1

S2

S2

S1

P1

P2

P2

P1

P1

P2

P2

P1

S1

S2

S2

S1

S1

S2

S2

S1

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

76

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

76

PART 1 : Generality

PART 1 : Generality

PART 2 : O Operating ti Principle Pi i l

PART 2 : O Operating ti Principle Pi i l

PART 3 : Other Substation Topologies Ad Advantages t / Disadvantages Di d t

PART 3 : Other Substation Topologies Ad Advantages t / Disadvantages Di d t

PART 4 : High Impedance Differential Protection Pi i l Principle

PART 4 : High Impedance Differential Protection Pi i l Principle

PART 5 : Low Impedance Protection Principle

PART 5 : Low Impedance Protection Principle

PART 6 : F Frame Leakage L k P Protection t ti - Principle Pi i l

PART 6 : F Frame Leakage L k P Protection t ti - Principle Pi i l

PART 7 : Blocking Scheme Protection

PART 7 : Blocking Scheme Protection

PART 8 : Other Applications

PART 8 : Other Applications 77

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

GENERAL SCHEME

GENERAL SCHEME

BB1a

BB1b

Peripheral Unit

Peripheral Peripheral Peripheral Unit Unit Unit

Peripheral Units

Optical Fibres

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

BB1a

BB1b

Peripheral Unit

Unité Centralle

77

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Peripheral Unit

Peripheral Unit

Optical Fibres

Peripheral Unit

Peripheral Unit

Peripheral Units

78

Peripheral Peripheral Peripheral Unit Unit Unit

Peripheral Units

Optical Fibres

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Peripheral Unit

Unité Centralle

Peripheral Unit

Optical Fibres

Peripheral Unit

Peripheral Unit

Peripheral Units

78

Bias Characteristic Principle

Bias Characteristic Principle

idiff (t)

idiff (t) Tripping pp g Area

X

X

i1 X

X i3

X

Tripping pp g Area

X

i2

in

ID>2 IS ID>1

X

Blocking Area

X

i1 X i3

X

i2

in

ID>2 IS ID>1

Blocking Area

ibias (t)

Differentail Current: idiffnoeud (t) = i1 + i2 + i3 + … + in Operating p gQ Quantity: y idiff ((t)= ) |i| diffnoeud ((t)| )| = |  in| Bias Quantity: ibias(t) = |i1|+ |i2|+ | i3| + … + |in| =  |in| Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Differentail Current: idiffnoeud (t) = i1 + i2 + i3 + … + in Operating p gQ Quantity: y idiff ((t)= ) |i| diffnoeud ((t)| )| = |  in| Bias Quantity: ibias(t) = |i1|+ |i2|+ | i3| + … + |in| =  |in| 79

INTEGRATED FUNCTIONS

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

79

INTEGRATED FUNCTIONS

●Peripheral Units Objective

●Peripheral Units Objective

● Local Current Acquisition ● Local Signal Processing (magnitude, angle, saturation detection ) ● Local Back-up Protections (Max I)

● Local Current Acquisition ● Local Signal Processing (magnitude, angle, saturation detection ) ● Local Back-up Protections (Max I)

●Central Unit objective

●Central Unit objective

● Automatic Adaptation p of zone number ● Differential Calculation Element for each zone ● Differential Calculation Element « Check Zone » ● Communication management CU < > PU ● Circuitry Fault Control for each Differential Element

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

ibias (t)

● Automatic Adaptation p of zone number ● Differential Calculation Element for each zone ● Differential Calculation Element « Check Zone » ● Communication management CU < > PU ● Circuitry Fault Control for each Differential Element

80

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

80

OTHER INTEGRATED FUNCTIONS

OTHER INTEGRATED FUNCTIONS

●Peripheral Units Objective

●Peripheral Units Objective

● Pole Discrepency Supervision, for circuit breakers and bus disconnectors ● CT Supervision S i i ● Inter-Tripping management in case of Internal Bus Fault ● Circuit Breaker Failure : ReTrip order (stage 1) or Zone Tripping (stage 2)

● Pole Discrepency Supervision, for circuit breakers and bus disconnectors ● CT Supervision S i i ● Inter-Tripping management in case of Internal Bus Fault ● Circuit Breaker Failure : ReTrip order (stage 1) or Zone Tripping (stage 2)

●Central Unit objective

●Central Unit objective

● Circuit Breaker Failure– Definition of zones to be tripped ● Maintenance modes management (per zone differential blocking)

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

● Circuit Breaker Failure– Definition of zones to be tripped ● Maintenance modes management (per zone differential blocking)

81

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Current Circuitry Fault Supervision

Current Circuitry Fault Supervision

● Under ideal operating conditions idiff = 0

● Under ideal operating conditions idiff = 0

● Under normal operating conditions idiff  0

● Under normal operating conditions idiff  0

● => use of a circuitry fault alarm threshold so that : 1.2 x idiff (normal operation)  (ID>1))  0.8 x Ifeeder (min (min. load)

● => use of a circuitry fault alarm threshold so that : 1.2 x idiff (normal operation)  (ID>1))  0.8 x Ifeeder (min (min. load)

● => Affected zone blocking (option depending on manufacturer)

● => Affected zone blocking (option depending on manufacturer)

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

82

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

81

82

Check Zone Supervision

Check Zone Supervision

●The Check Zone Element does not take into account the status g to bus A or B)) of busbar disconnections ((assignment

●The Check Zone Element does not take into account the status g to bus A or B)) of busbar disconnections ((assignment

Total Idiff = Sum of current node idiff idiff(t) CZ =  idiff =  ( i) 

Total Idiff = Sum of current node idiff idiff(t) CZ =  idiff =  ( i) 

●Under pole discrepency condition on a circuit breaker or a bus disconnector the differential current in the check zone remains disconnector, nil, preventing any maloperation of the busbar protection,

●Under pole discrepency condition on a circuit breaker or a bus disconnector the differential current in the check zone remains disconnector, nil, preventing any maloperation of the busbar protection,

●=> A trip will be issued only if the differential current measured by y the check zone has reached the tripping pp g threshold.

●=> A trip will be issued only if the differential current measured byy the check zone has reached the tripping pp g threshold.

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

83

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Tripping Threshold Conditions

Tripping Threshold Conditions

● No Blocking due to Circuitry Fault

● No Blocking due to Circuitry Fault

● Differential Current detected by the Check Zone Element

● Differential Current detected by the Check Zone Element

● Differential Current above the Tripping Threshold, generaly set so that :

● Differential Current above the Tripping Threshold, generaly set so that :

1,2 x I_highest loaded feeder  (ID>2)  0.8 x I” Min. shortshort-

1,2 x I_highest loaded feeder  (ID>2)  0.8 x I” Min. shortshort-

Circuit

Circuit

● Fault point inside the Characteristic Operating Area

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

83

● Fault point inside the Characteristic Operating Area

84

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

84

Use of only 1 CT on the Bus Coupler

Use of only 1 CT on the Bus Coupler

●Pole Discrepency on the bus coupler Circuit Breaker :

●Pole Discrepency on the bus coupler Circuit Breaker :

Zone 1

BB1

Zone 2

BB2

ILOAD across CB CB.

Zone 1

BB1

EN

EN

IdiffZ2 = + ILOAD

IdiffZ1= 0

Peripheral Unit

IdiffZ2 = + ILOAD

IdiffZ1= 0

CB CLOSED but given Status is OPEN

Peripheral Unit

CB CLOSED but given Status is OPEN

Central Unit Peripheral Unit

Peripheral Unit

Zone 2

BB2

ILOAD across CB CB.

Central Unit

Check zone Idiff =  idiff = idiffZ1+ idiffEN1 + idiffZ2 =0

Peripheral Unit

Peripheral Unit

Peripheral Unit

● The protection remainS stable

Peripheral Unit

Check zone Idiff =  idiff = idiffZ1+ idiffEN1 + idiffZ2 =0

Peripheral Unit

Peripheral Unit

● The protection remainS stable 85

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

85

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Use of 2 CTs on the Bus Coupler

Use of 2 CTs on the Bus Coupler

●Bus Coupler CB closed and fault on the Bus coupler

●Bus Coupler CB closed and fault on the Bus coupler

Zone 1

BB1

IdiffZ3 = IFault VZ

IdiffZ1= 0

Zone 2

BB2

Zone 1

IdiffZ2 = 0

Peripheral Unit

Check zone Idiff =  idiff = idiffZ1+ idiffZ3 + idiffZ2 =iFault

IdiffZ2 = 0

Central Unit Peripheral Unit

Peripheral Unit

●In case of Fault on the Bus Coupler, the relay will generally trip both zones, BUT, a two stage trip is possible depending on :

Peripheral Unit

Peripheral Unit

Check zone Idiff =  idiff = idiffZ1+ idiffZ3 + idiffZ2 =iFault

Peripheral Unit

Peripheral Unit

●In case of Fault on the Bus Coupler, the relay will generally trip both zones, BUT, a two stage trip is possible depending on :

●The fault current level level, ●The required max clearance time (stability criteria) Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Zone 2

BB2

Peripher. Unit

Peripher. Unit

Central Unit Peripheral Unit

IdiffZ3 = IFault VZ

IdiffZ1= 0

Peripher. Unit

Peripher. Unit

BB1

●The fault current level level, ●The required max clearance time (stability criteria) 86

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

86

Dead Zone

Dead Zone

●Feeder’s CB open : Fauklt between CT and CB

●Feeder’s CB open : Fauklt between CT and CB

idiff

idiff

Trip

EN

EN

ID>2 IS ID>1

Restrain

● No zone trip but intertrip to the remote end 87

Typical Tripping Scheme Peripheral Unit

idiff(t) > k2 . ibias (t )

Local confirmation I>BB or IN>BB*

CZ

idiff(t) > [IDCZ>2 ] I  0 in more than 1 feeder No CT saturation detected

Local confirmation or V0>*

V<

Zone & CZ

Peripheral Unit

idiff(t) > k2 . ibias (t )

Local confirmation I>BB or IN>BB*

idiff(t) > kCZ . ibias CZ(t ) idiff(t) > [IDCZ>2 ] I  0 in more than 1 feeder

Local L l signal i l processing i

No CT saturation detected

5

No broken sec.y CT detected

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Central Unit (87 BB)

idiff(t) > [ID>2 ]

3 & 4

87

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Typical Tripping Scheme

Central Unit (87 BB)

2

ibias

●Fixe current threshold or ●Current linked to the zone differential current, to avoid any pole discrepency problem on the CB status

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

idiff(t) > kCZ . ibias CZ(t )

Restrain

● The relay detects the fault b y using a current criteria

● No zone trip but intertrip to the remote end

1

ID>2 IS ID>1

ibias

●Fixe current threshold or ●Current linked to the zone differential current, to avoid any pole discrepency problem on the CB status

idiff(t) > [ID>2 ]

Idiff EN = I Défaut Ibias EN = I Défaut

Idiff EN = 0 Ibi Ibias EN = 0

● The relay detects the fault b y using a current criteria

Zone

EN

EN

Idiff EN = I Défaut Ibias EN = I Défaut

Idiff EN = 0 Ibi EN = 0 Ibias

Trip

1 2

Local confirmation or V0>*

V<

&

3 & 4

L Local l signal i l processing i

5

No broken sec.y CT detected

88

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

88

Low Impedance Protection Synthesis

Low Impedance Protection Synthesis

 Stability S bili iis entirely i l d due to the h bi bias characteristic h i i off the h scheme. Metrosils and Stabilizing resistors are not required,

 Stability S bili iis entirely i l d due to the h bi bias characteristic h i i off the h scheme. Metrosils and Stabilizing resistors are not required,

 CTs can have different ratios

 CTs can have different ratios

 Scheme bias characteristic can cater for lesser accuracy CTs (class 5P), instead of Class X CTs,

 Scheme bias characteristic can cater for lesser accuracy CTs (class 5P), instead of Class X CTs,

 CTs with moderate knee point voltages can be used used, because the relay can manage the saturation effects,

 CTs with moderate knee point voltages can be used used, because the relay can manage the saturation effects,

CTs can be shared with other protection, due to low burden,

CTs can be shared with other protection, due to low burden,

 Number of // circuits does not affect he primary operating current

 Number of // circuits does not affect he primary operating current

 Fast ast Tripping pp g ttime e ((Decision ec s o bet between ee 3 to 5 ms) s)

 Fast ast Tripping pp g ttime e ((Decision ec s o bet between ee 3 to 5 ms) s)

 Isolator contact are not needed to switch heavy currents,

 Isolator contact are not needed to switch heavy currents,

 Extending the scheme is simple,

 Extending the scheme is simple,

 Self supervision and breaker fail protection is easier to integrate,

 Self supervision and breaker fail protection is easier to integrate,

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

89

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

PART 1 : Generality

PART 1 : Generality

PART 2 : O Operating ti Principle Pi i l

PART 2 : O Operating ti Principle Pi i l

PART 3 : Other Substation Topologies Ad Advantages t / Disadvantages Di d t

PART 3 : Other Substation Topologies Ad Advantages t / Disadvantages Di d t

PART 4 : High Impedance Differential Protection Pi i l Principle

PART 4 : High Impedance Differential Protection Pi i l Principle

PART 5 : Low Impedance Protection – Principle

PART 5 : Low Impedance Protection – Principle

PART 6 : Frame Leakage Protection Principle

PART 6 : Frame Leakage Protection Principle

PART 7 : Blocking Scheme Protection

PART 7 : Blocking Scheme Protection

PART 8 : Other Applications

PART 8 : Other Applications

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

90

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

89

90

Frame Leakage Busbar Protection

Frame Leakage Busbar Protection

●Principle and Limitations

●Principle and Limitations

● Limited to Medium Voltage BusBar applications ● Can detect only earth faults ● Means that the fault current betwwen circuit breaker cells and earth must be measured :

● Limited to Medium Voltage BusBar applications ● Can detect only earth faults ● Means that the fault current betwwen circuit breaker cells and earth must be measured :

●=> Switchgear must be insulated from earth (by standing on concrete plinth), li th) ●=> Only one single earth conductor allowed on switchgear, ●=> All cable glands must be insulated from the cell’s earth, ●=> Only O l one single i l phase h CT iis used, d b between t earth th conductor d t and d an instantaneous overcurrent relay.

●=> Switchgear must be insulated from earth (by standing on concrete plinth), li th) ●=> Only one single earth conductor allowed on switchgear, ●=> All cable glands must be insulated from the cell’s earth, ●=> Only O l one single i l phase h CT iis used, d b between t earth th conductor d t and d an instantaneous overcurrent relay.

● In case of several sections (with couplers), Switchgear sections must be insulated.

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

● In case of several sections (with couplers), Switchgear sections must be insulated.

91

Frame Leakage Busbar Protection

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

91

Frame Leakage Busbar Protection

>I

>I

Insulation

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Insulation

92

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

92

Frame Leakage Busbar Protection

Frame Leakage Busbar Protection

>I

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

>I

93

Frame Leakage Busbar Protection

93

Frame Leakage Busbar Protection

>I

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

>I

94

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

94

Frame Leakage Busbar Protection

>I

Frame Leakage Busbar Protection

>I

>I

95

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Frame Leakage Busbar Protection

>I

95

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Frame Leakage Busbar Protection

Confirmation by Transformer Neutral protection

Confirmation by Transformer Neutral protection

False Operation because induced loop

False Operation because induced loop

>I

>I

(Insulation Fault)

(Insulation Fault) >I

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Tripping is confirmed by the relay, to avoid false trip

>I

96

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Tripping is confirmed by the relay, to avoid false trip

96

Frame Leakage Busbar Protection

Frame Leakage Busbar Protection

Confirmation by Transformer Neutral protection

Confirmation by Transformer Neutral protection

>I

>I

>I

>I

97

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Frame Leakage Busbar Protection

Frame Leakage Busbar Protection

Confirmation by Transformer Neutral protection

Confirmation by Transformer Neutral protection

>I

>I

>I

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

97

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

>I

98

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

98

Blocking Scheme Busbar Protection >II

>II

>II

>II

>II

Blocking Scheme Busbar Protection

BUSBAR PROTECTION LOGIC

>II

99

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Blocking Scheme Busbar Protection >II

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

>II

>II

>II

>II

>II

>II

>II

>II

BUSBAR PROTECTION LOGIC

99

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Blocking Scheme Busbar Protection

BUSBAR PROTECTION LOGIC

>II

100

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

>II

>II

>II

>II

BUSBAR PROTECTION LOGIC

100

Blocking Scheme Busbar Protection >II

>II

>II

>II

>II

Blocking Scheme Busbar Protection

BUSBAR PROTECTION LOGIC

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

>II

101

>II

>II

>II

>II

BUSBAR PROTECTION LOGIC

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

PART 1 : Generality

PART 1 : Generality

PART 2 : Operating Principle

PART 2 : Operating Principle

PART 3 : Other Substation Topologies Advantages / Disadvantages

PART 3 : Other Substation Topologies Advantages / Disadvantages

PART 4 : High Impedance Differential Protection – Principle

PART 4 : High Impedance Differential Protection – Principle

PART 5 : Low Impedance Protection – Principle

PART 5 : Low Impedance Protection – Principle

PART 6 : Frame Leakage Protection - Principle

PART 6 : Frame Leakage Protection - Principle

PART 7 : Blocking Scheme Protection

PART 7 : Blocking Scheme Protection

PART 8 : Other Applications

PART 8 : Other Applications

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

102

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

101

102

Busbar Blocking Protection

Busbar Blocking Protection

● Fault at F1

● Fault at F1

● Tripping of the Feeder Relay Only ● Blocking of the Incommer Relay

● Tripping of the Feeder Relay Only ● Blocking of the Incommer Relay

Incomer

● Fault at F2

O/C Relay

BLOCK

● Fault at F2

● No Blocking of the Incomer Relay ● Time Delayed tripping of the Incomer and Fault Clearance IF2 O/C Relay

Incomer O/C Relay

BLOCK

● No Blocking of the Incomer Relay ● Time Delayed tripping of the Incomer and Fault Clearance IF2 O/C Relay

O/C Relay

O/C Relay

O/C Relay

IF1

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

O/C Relay

O/C Relay

O/C Relay

IF1

103

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

PART 1 : Generality

PART 1 : Generality

PART 2 : Operating Principle

PART 2 : Operating Principle

PART 3 : Other Substation Topologies Advantages / Disadvantages

PART 3 : Other Substation Topologies Advantages / Disadvantages

PART 4 : High Impedance Differential Protection – Principle

PART 4 : High Impedance Differential Protection – Principle

PART 5 : Low Impedance Protection – Principle

PART 5 : Low Impedance Protection – Principle

PART 6 : Frame Leakage Protection - Principle

PART 6 : Frame Leakage Protection - Principle

PART 7 : Blocking Scheme Protection

PART 7 : Blocking Scheme Protection

PART 8 : Other Applications

PART 8 : Other Applications

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

104

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

103

104

Bus Protection - other application

Bus Protection - other application

●Other Application commonly used for ‘’Oil & Gas’’

●Other Application commonly used for ‘’Oil & Gas’’

● Use of a Partial BusBar relay ● The 51∆ Relay is limited to the load current of each half section

● Use of a Partial BusBar relay ● The 51∆ Relay is limited to the load current of each half section

I_pilote=I_incomer-I_coupler

I_pilote=I_incomer-I_coupler

●Same scheme than previously

●Same scheme than previously

●Advantage

●Advantage

● Protection of BB1 even if TA is in maintenance

● Protection of BB1 even if TA is in maintenance

105

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

105

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

Bus Protection - other application

Bus Protection - other application

●Protection by Transformer Differential Relay

●Protection by Transformer Differential Relay

● Can be used in case of 4 feeders max ● No Bus Coupler or Bus Disconnector

● Can be used in case of 4 feeders max ● No Bus Coupler or Bus Disconnector 87T

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

87T

106

Schneider Electric - Jean Marmonier - 20/01/2011

106