48-Raquel Ramos Beltrano v. Rep. of the Phil. CA-G.R. No. CV No. L-21394 July 5, 1990
Short Description
University of Nueva Caceres College of Law Evidence SY 2016-2017 2nd Semester...
Description
Raquel Ramos Ramos Beltrano v. v. Rep. of the Phil.CA-G.R. Phil.CA-G.R. No. CV No. L-213! L-213!
1 of 11
Republic of the Philippines
SUPREME COURT Manila EN BANC
G.R. No. L-5346
January 3, 1911
W. W. ROBNSON, ROBNSON , plaintiff-appellee, vs.
M!RCELNO "LL!#UERTE $ R!%OL!, defendant-appellant. R. Diokno for appellant. Haussermann, Cohn and Fisher for appellee.
TORRES, ".: On April !, "#!$, %. %. Robinson entered suit in the Court of &irst 'nstance of (a)abas a*ainst Marcelino +illafuerte ) Raola, alle*in* as a first cause of action: (hat the plaintiff as en*a*ed, in the cit) of Manila and at the tie specified further on, in the iportation and sale of flour and other products fro abroad, ith an office in the cit) of Manila, a business hich he still continued, throu*h the a*enc) of Castle Brothers, %olf / 0ons, established therein1 that the defendant, a resident of 2ucena, (a)abas, b) an instruent dul) e3ecuted on October "#, "#!4, b) his attorne) in fact and le*al representative, +icente Marcelo Concepcion, ho as full) epoered and authori5ed for the purpose, and ratified on the sae date before the notar) public of Manila, 6. R. %illias, ac7noled*ed and confessed that he oed the plaintiff the net su of P,$89.8!1 that b) the said instruent dul) e3ecuted the defendant bound and pled*ed hiself to pa) to the plaintiff the said su of P,$89.8! in four onthl) installents fro that date, at the rate of P",!!! for each of the first three installents and P$89.8! for the last one, and li7eise the interest thereon at the rate of $ per cent per annu, to be adusted and paid at the tie of pa)in* each of the installents fi3ed1 that in the said instruent the defendant oreover bound hiself to pa) to the plaintiff the su of P8!! for costs and e3penses, in case the latter should recur to udicial process for the collection of the aforeentioned debt1 and that, as securit) for the pa)ent of the said debt, of the interest thereon and of the aount for costs and e3penses, the defendant voluntaril) e3ecuted, b) eans of the said instruent and in favor of the plaintiff, a special ort*a*e upon the properties of his absolute onership and control, hich are: A., p. ;9, bac7. A rural estate, No.
View more...
Comments