336506432 Lesson Plan in Practical Research 1.Docx.dlp

Republic of the Philippines Department of Education GADU NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL  – NANGALISAN EXTENSION Nangalisan, Solana, Cagayan Grade and Section: Date: Time:

LESSON PLAN IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2 CONTENT: CONTENT STANDARD: PERFORMANCE STANDARD: LEARNING COMPETENCIES:

CODE: INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS/ REFERENCES:

Learning from Others and Reviewing the Literature The learner demonstrates understanding of: 1. the criteria in selecting, citing, and synthesizing related literature 2. the ethical standards in writing related literature literatur e The learner is able to: 1. select, cite, and synthesize judiciously related literature literatur e and use sources according to ethical standards The learner: 1. selects relevant literature literatur e 2. compare and contrast the two referencing styles; cites related literature using standard style (APA or MLA) CS_RS12-If-j-1; CS_RS12-If-j -1; CS_RS12-If-j-2 CS_RS12-If-j- 2    

PowerPoint Presentation Activity sheets Samples of referencing styles Baraceros, E. 2016, Practical Research 2, Rex Book Store, pp. 51  – 61.  – 61.

PROCEDURE PRE-ACTIVITY A. B. C. D.

PRAYER CHECKING OF ATTENDANCE REVIEW MOTIVATION

 A ctivi cti vity ty - Deal or No N o Deal: R R L in i n Quantitativ Quantitative e Res R es earch Directions: Say “DEAL” if the given statement is true and “NO DEAL” if otherwise. 1. Reviewing related literature is one of the major activity in research that makes you examine or study again concepts or ideas related to your research. 2. There are two basic methods of reviewing related literature. 3. Systematic review of related literature happens through sequential steps. 4. Meta-analysis is a kind of RRL in which you re-examine and combine the results of two or more statistical studies for coming out with a grand total to indicate stronger effects of the research outcome. 5. Merging of statistical statistica l results is applicable to all quantitative research studies. LESSON PROPER

Presentation The teacher will present the topic and the learning objective of the lesson. A. ACTIVITY

Group Activity  – C ritique Me if Y ou Can Directions: Divide the class into several groups. Give each group four samples of referencing styles to check and evaluate. Use the given checklist to evaluate the samples. B. ANALYSIS  Ask the following following questions: questions: 1. What are your important observations about the four referencing styles samples? styles  samples? 2. Based on your evaluation, which do you think is a MLA Referencing Style? Which is APA referencing Style? Why?

C. ABSTRACTION 1. Discuss the two most commonly used referencing styles  Ask the following questions: 1. What makes MLA Referencing Style different from APA Referencing Style? 2. Which of the two is easier to construct? Why? D. APPLICATION Group Activity  – APA System versus MLA System0000 Directions: Decide whether the following aspects is APA System or MLA System. Sort and write them on the chart provided. Full surname first, then followed by initials of first and middle name Full surname first, followed by full first name, and optional initial of the middle name Italicized title with only the beginning word capitalized (exception: capital for every proper noun) Underlined or italicized tile with all content words capitalized Written after the author’s name Written after the publisher’s name      

Aspect Writing the Author’s name

APA System

MLA System

Writing the title of the reading material Writing the copyright date

EVALUATION Directions: Circle the letter of the correct answer. 1. Meta-analysis supports a review of related literature that is: a. traditional b. systematic c. technical d. total 2. A systematic review of related literature follows a certain: a. Theory b. Method c. Instruction d. Model 3. Being honest, truthful, and grateful in doing the review of related literature is practicing: a. Smartness b. Cut-and-paste c. Ethics d. Individualism 4. Referencing within the body of the paper gives you this research-paper component: a. Footnotes b. Bibliography c. References d. Citation 5. Quantitative research uses meta-analysis; qualitative research use: a. Narrative synthesis b. Discourse synthesis c. Data analysis d. Thematic synthesis ASSIGMENT/AGREEMENT In a brief reflective essay, express how much you understood the concepts about the RRL in a quantitative research. Specify which ideas sank into your mind or came to your understanding excellently. Write your answers in your notebook.

Prepared by:

JAKIE B. UBINA, MST Teacher II Gadu National High School – Nangalisan Extension

Republic of the Philippines Department of Education GADU NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL  – NANGALISAN EXTENSION Nangalisan, Solana, Cagayan Grade and Section: Date: Time:

LESSON PLAN IN DISASTER READINESS AND RISK REDUCTION (DRRR) TOPIC: CONTENT STANDARD: PERFORMANCE STANDARD: LEARNING COMPETENCIES:

CODE: INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS/ REFERENCES:

Introduction to the Philippine DRRM Law: Implementing Rules and Regulations The learner demonstrates understanding of: 3. the criteria in selecting, citing, and synthesizing related literature 4. the ethical standards in writing related literature The learner is able to: 2. select, cite, and synthesize judiciously related literature and use sources according to ethical standards The learner: 3. selects relevant literature 4. compare and contrast the two referencing styles; cites related literature using standard style (APA or MLA) CS_RS12-If-j-1; CS_RS12-If-j-2    

PowerPoint Presentation Activity sheets Samples of referencing styles Baraceros, E. 2016, Practical Research 2, Rex Book Store, pp. 51  – 61.

PROCEDURE PRE-ACTIVITY A. B. C. D.

PRAYER CHECKING OF ATTENDANCE REVIEW MOTIVATION

 A ctivity - Deal or No Deal: R R L i n Quantitative Res earch Directions: Say “DEAL” if the given statement is true and “NO DEAL” if otherwise. 6. Reviewing related literature is one of the major activity in research that makes you examine or study again concepts or ideas related to your research. 7. There are two basic methods of reviewing related literature. 8. Systematic review of related literature happens through sequential steps. 9. Meta-analysis is a kind of RRL in which you re-examine and combine the results of two or more statistical studies for coming out with a grand total to indicate stronger effects of the research outcome. 10. Merging of statistical results is applicable to all quantitative research studies. LESSON PROPER

Presentation The teacher will present the topic and the learning objective of the lesson. E. ACTIVITY

Group Activity  – Critique Me if Y ou Can Directions: Divide the class into several groups. Give each group four samples of referencing styles to check and evaluate. Use the given checklist to evaluate the samples. F. ANALYSIS  Ask the following questions: 3. What are your important observations about the four referencing styles samples? 4. Based on your evaluation, which do you think is a MLA Referencing Style? Which is APA referencing Style? Why?

G. ABSTRACTION 2. Discuss the two most commonly used referencing styles  Ask the following questions: 3. What makes MLA Referencing Style different from APA Referencing Style? 4. Which of the two is easier to construct? Why? H. APPLICATION Group Activity  – APA System versus MLA System0000 Directions: Decide whether the following aspects is APA System or MLA System. Sort and write them on the chart provided. Full surname first, then followed by initials of first and middle name Full surname first, followed by full first name, and optional initial of the middle name Italicized title with only the beginning word capitalized (exception: capital for every proper noun) Underlined or italicized tile with all content words capitalized Written after the author’s name Written after the publisher’s name      

Aspect Writing the Author’s name

APA System

MLA System

Writing the title of the reading material Writing the copyright date

EVALUATION Directions: Circle the letter of the correct answer. 6. Meta-analysis supports a review of related literature that is: e. traditional f. systematic g. technical h. total 7. A systematic review of related literature follows a certain: e. Theory f. Method g. Instruction h. Model 8. Being honest, truthful, and grateful in doing the review of related literature is practicing: e. Smartness f. Cut-and-paste g. Ethics h. Individualism 9. Referencing within the body of the paper gives you this research-paper component: e. Footnotes f. Bibliography g. References h. Citation 10. Quantitative research uses meta-analysis; qualitative research use: e. Narrative synthesis f. Discourse synthesis g. Data analysis h. Thematic synthesis ASSIGMENT/AGREEMENT In a brief reflective essay, express how much you understood the concepts about the RRL in a quantitative research. Specify which ideas sank into your mind or came to your understanding excellently. Write your answers in your notebook.

Prepared by:

JAKIE B. UBINA, MST Teacher II Gadu National High School – Nangalisan Extension