3 Energy Insights Seminar Hotel

ENERGY INSIGHTS OPTIMISING HYDRONIC SYSTEMS FOR ENERGY SAVINGS Tom Pak

May 9th 2012

ENGINEERING ADVANTAGE

World's energy consumption 40% of the world's energy consumption is used in buildings*

Copyright © TA Hydronics SA. All rights reserved.

50% of this is in HVAC systems alone*

(*) Sources: European Commission EPBD (point 6, pp1) & US Department of Energy’s “Buildings Energy Data Book” 2

ENGINEERING ADVANTAGE

Energy savings on HVAC in buildings

Building structure

HVAC installation

Human factor

(insulation, double glazing, …)

• Use of new technologies • System approach of hydronic design • Shorter pay-back times

• Avoid interferences with the HVAC system • Educate tenants and maintenance team • Never-ending task

Copyright © TA Hydronics SA. All rights reserved.

• Best way to save energy • Larger energy savings • Long pay-back times

Building modifications require adaptation or modernization of the HVAC installation to take into account new heat gains/losses 3

When modifying a HVAC installation one must take into account the capabilities of people using the installation ENGINEERING ADVANTAGE

Energy savings via hydronic optimization Optimising a building's HVAC system can reduce its energy consumption by 30% :

Copyright © TA Hydronics SA. All rights reserved.

‒ By avoiding the deterioration of production unit efficiencies, ‒ By optimizing the energy efficiency of the hydronic distribution, ‒ By guaranteeing a stable and accurate room temperature.

4

ENGINEERING ADVANTAGE

IMPROVING PRODUCTION UNIT EFFICIENCIES

12

Chillers Coefficient of Performance (COP) is used to indicate chiller efficiency: Condenser

COP =

Pevaporator Pcompressor

≈ 2.5K 4K6

Tr

Ts Evaporator

Chilled water

Heat transfer (and thus COP) is good when Log Mean Temperature Difference between water and refrigerant is kept high

Copyright © TA Hydronics SA. All rights reserved.

‒ Evaporator refrigerant temperature remains constant ‒ Supply water temperature Ts is usually kept constant ‒ Thus return water temperature Tr must be kept "high" to keep LMTD high

Tr

Ts Refrigerant saturated suction temp.

Keeping a high Tr (thus a high ∆T = Ts-Tr) provides higher COP at partial load

24

ENGINEERING ADVANTAGE

Effect of a decrease of the return water temp. on COP

COP

Example : Chiller: 200 tons (703 kW) Water condenser temperatures: 29,5°/35°C Supply temperature of chilled water Ts : 7°C 5,2 5 5

4,8 4,6 4,6

4,4 4,4

4,2 Copyright © TA Hydronics SA. All rights reserved.

4,2 4 10,5

11

11,5

12

12,5

13

Return temp. chilled water Tr [°C]

15%

A reduction of return temperature of chilled water can lead to a 15% drop of the COP 25

ENGINEERING ADVANTAGE

Variable flow – proportional control The ∆T through a terminal unit increases when the flow reduces.

2-way circuit (variable flow) qp

Thus the return water temperature increases when the flow reduces. Cooling

H C STAD

Copyright © TA Hydronics SA. All rights reserved.

Return temp. Tr

All benefits for chiller COP.

26,0 24,0 22,0 20,0 18,0 16,0 14,0 12,0 10,0 8,0 6,0

Temperature regime: Ts/Tr/Ti = 7/12/24°C

Variable flow circuit

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Flow through terminal unit 26

ENGINEERING ADVANTAGE

Constant flow system – proportional control The ∆T through a terminal unit increases when the flow reduces.

3-way diverting circuit (constant flow) qp qs

H STAD-B

qb

But the flow through the terminal unit is reduced by bypassing an increasing fraction of the primary flow (at temperature Ts).

C

STAD-P

Copyright © TA Hydronics SA. All rights reserved.

Return temp. Tr

Constant flow

Thus the return water temperature decreases when the flow reduces !!!

Variable flow

Cooling

26,0 24,0 22,0 20,0 18,0 16,0 14,0 12,0 10,0 8,0 6,0

Temperature regime: Ts/Tr/Ti = 7/12/24°C

Variable flow circuit Constant flow circuit 0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Flow through terminal unit 27

ENGINEERING ADVANTAGE

Variable flow system with 2-way on-off control When some CV are closed: – there is less total flow and Dp in piping – and thus more available Dp everywhere in the system – open valves receive a flow that is higher than design flow

At partial load in the system, if a valve is open: q >= qdesign

> qd open

0 qd

open shut

Copyright © TA Hydronics SA. All rights reserved.

0 qd open shut

28

open

> qd

open

> qd

>qd

open

ENGINEERING ADVANTAGE

On-off control – Flow increase at partial load

Total system flow

Manually balanced variable flow on-off control system 100 identical units; Pump head 150 kPa; Terminal unit 20 kPa; On-off CV 5 kPa 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

Temperature regime: Ts/Tr/Ti = 7/12/24°C

Copyright © TA Hydronics SA. All rights reserved.

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

System load

At 50% load, the total flow in system reaches 73% of the total design flow. This is a 46% increase w.r.t. the required flow (50%) at 50% load. Seasonal flow increase lead to an estimated increased pumping energy consumption equal to +3% of total plant energy consumption 29

3%

ENGINEERING ADVANTAGE

On-off control – Emission at partial load At flow that is near design flow, emitted power does not increase much with the flow

Emission

120%

100%

80%

60%

40%

Copyright © TA Hydronics SA. All rights reserved.

Room t°

Control signal switches on/off when room temperature deviates much beyond the thermostat differential

0% 0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

140%

160%

Flow

At partial load in the system, if a valve is open:

Design set-point 24°C

(Troom - Tset-point) >…=…< Time

30

20%

P ≈ Pdesign

q ⋅ ∆T P= k

q ≥ qdesign

∆T ≤ ∆Tdesign

ENGINEERING ADVANTAGE

Return water temp. degradation

Return temp. Tr

Manually balanced variable flow on-off control system 100 identical units; Pump head 150 kPa; Terminal unit 20 kPa; On-off CV 5 kPa 14

Temperature regime: Ts/Tr/Ti = 7/12/24°C

12 10 8 6 4 2 0

Copyright © TA Hydronics SA. All rights reserved.

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

System load

Below 50% of the load, which represents typically 70% of the cooling season, the return water temperature is degraded by 1.5 to 2°C. This will result approximately in a 3 to 4% increase in seasonal chiller energy consumption 31

3%

ENGINEERING ADVANTAGE

Return water temp. – proportional vs on-off control Cooling Temperature regime: Ts/Tr/Ti = 7/12/24°C 26,0 24,0 22,0 20,0 18,0 16,0 14,0 12,0 10,0 8,0 6,0

On-off control 26,0 24,0 22,0 20,0 18,0 16,0 14,0 12,0 10,0 8,0 6,0

Return temp. Tr

Return temp. Tr

Proportional control

2-way proportional 3-way proportional 0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

3-way on-off, MBV 0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

System load

Copyright © TA Hydronics SA. All rights reserved.

Flow through terminal unit

2-way on-off, MBV

32

ENGINEERING ADVANTAGE

Case Study - Local University campus buildings

Copyright © TA Hydronics SA. All rights reserved.

Renovation of 2 University buildings with a total of 9840 m2 Installed cooling capacity: – Building 1 : 1452 tons refrig. – Building 2 : 1730 tons refrig. Work performed during summer 2010 Results compared for Oct.-Nov. 2009 vs 2010 DP controllers paired with manual balancing valves installed

33

ENGINEERING ADVANTAGE

Local University campus building 1 – chiller saving

Power input [kW]

Chiller Power Input vs. Cooling Load

Variable secondary flow with differential pressure bypass

2009 2010

Copyright © TA Hydronics SA. All rights reserved.

Dp controllers at on-off control FCU groups and PAU/AHUs and re-balanced

Cooling load [kW]

Annualized 22% chiller energy saving

22% 34

34

ENGINEERING ADVANTAGE

Local University campus building 2 – chiller saving

Power input [kW]

Chiller Power Input vs. Cooling Load

Variable flow primarysecondary system

2009

Copyright © TA Hydronics SA. All rights reserved.

2010

Cooling load [kW]

35

Addition of Dp controllers at FCU groups zones and pressure independent control valves for PAU/AHU and re-balanced Annualized 16.5% chiller energy saving

16%

ENGINEERING ADVANTAGE

Case study - business hotel at Sheung Wan > First LEED and BEAM Plus Platinum certifications of new-built hotel > 38 floors, 274 rooms > Chiller capacity 667 kW x 2 nos > Variable primary flow design > Hydronic balancing design

Copyright © TA Hydronics SA. All rights reserved.

> Chiller plant balancing > Dp control at each floor and modulating terminals > Balancing and control valve at FCUs

ENGINEERING ADVANTAGE

Hydronic balancing in variable primary flow

Copyright © TA Hydronics SA. All rights reserved.

4 Balancing & control valve for proportional balancing

3 DP stabilization against large Dp fluctuations in part load 1 Balanced chiller plant

2 Proper “fail-safe” bypass valve sizing and characteristic ENGINEERING ADVANTAGE

Copyright © TA Hydronics SA. All rights reserved.

Computerized hydronic system design

TA Select 4 hydronic system calculation

ENGINEERING ADVANTAGE

Computerized hydronic system design

Copyright © TA Hydronics SA. All rights reserved.

> Pipe sizing per BEC recommendations > Balancing valve sizing and pre-settings for easy and efficient commissioning > Minimum control valve authority checks (suggest > 0.25) to ensure indoor comfort with stable temperature control > Correct Index circuit identification to help determining optimal VFD sensor location and set-point > Pump head optimization: > Initial : 350 kPa > Select 4 : 236 kPa (-33%) > Final set : 250 kPa (-29%)

ENGINEERING ADVANTAGE

Computerized hydronic system design

Copyright © TA Hydronics SA. All rights reserved.

> Bypass valve sizing calculation

ENGINEERING ADVANTAGE

Tips for reliable and energy efficient VPF system > Make use of computerized software for hydraulic design calculations > Chiller plant must be balanced to avoid uneven distribution of flow > Proper bypass valve sizing and select with good rangeabilty, linear characteristic (or equal percentage characterisitic at 0.25 authority) valve > Use of high precision flow meter and local controller to monitor total return flow as fail-safe measure against chiller minimum flow > Use of DP controllers

Copyright © TA Hydronics SA. All rights reserved.

> to stablize Dp fluctuations to avoid overflow and low dT problems > to maintain good control valve authority necessary for stable temperature control > as flow/DP/DT/energy measuring station for energy audit purpose > Make system sustainable and adaptive to future changes

> Locate VSP sensor at index circuit and adjust set-point to the DP of the most demanding stablized circuit – potentially up to 40% pump energy saving > Make use of computerized balancing method and instrument to produce balancing report without manual record of measurements and verfications

ENGINEERING ADVANTAGE

Conclusion Important energy savings can be achieved by taking care of: ‒ Maintaining cold/warm return water temperature to condensing boilers/chillers (~15%), ‒ Having an adequate pressurisation avoiding scaling/fouling in boilers/evaporators (~5-10%).

Minimising pumping costs requires having (up to 40% on 7-17% in cooling): ‒ A good pressure maintenance to avoid corrosion leading to aging and fouling, ‒ An optimized hydronic distribution design (Dp control), ‒ A systematic methodology of balancing and commissioning.

Stable and accurate room t° control gives (~5-20%) energy savings by: Copyright © TA Hydronics SA. All rights reserved.

‒ Avoiding oversizing in on-off systems, ‒ Using state-of-the-art thermostatic radiator valves, ‒ Sizing of modulating control valves for good minimum authority.

The approach "He who can do more can do less" is to be avoided 92

ENGINEERING ADVANTAGE

Copyright © TA Hydronics SA. All rights reserved.

[email protected] [email protected]

93

ENGINEERING ADVANTAGE