22 - Some BOD Problems
Short Description
BOD Problem and Solutions...
Description
Some BOD problems Practice, Practice, Practice
Practice Problem #1 200 mL of Genesee river water was collected from jst below t!e brewer" 2 mL of river river water water dilted dilted to to 1 L, aerated and seeded $!e dissolved o%"&en content was '( m&)L initiall" *fter + da"s, t!e dissolved o%"&en content !ad dropped to + m&)L *fter 20 da"s, t!e dissolved o%"&en content !ad dropped to +- m&)L .!at is t!e ltimate BOD/
Soltion .e !ave mltiple data points so we dont need to assme t!e rate constant, , to be 02- da"s 31 4ow wold "o se t!e data to calclate /
$!e e5ation BOD6 7 BOD 813e3t9 $!e problem is, we !ave : nnowns So, even if we now 2 of t!em 8for e%ample, t!e BOD6 at a &iven time9, we still !ave 2 left 2 nnowns re5ire 2 e5ations to determine t!em
$!e e5ation BOD6 7 BOD 813e 3t9 is a constant BOD is a constant
$!e e5ation BOD+ 7 BOD 813e 38+ da"s99 BOD20 7 BOD 813e3820 da"s99 ;f we compare t!e ratio, t!e BOD cancels
$!e e5ation BOD+ 7 BOD 813e38+ da"s99 BOD20 BOD 813e3820 da"s99 BOD+ 7 813e38+ da"s99 BOD20 813e3820 da"s99 *nd we now BOD+)BOD20 ;ts jst a nmber, call it <
$!e e5ation < 7 813e38+ da"s99 813e3820 da"s99 *nd we jst solve for = 4ow wold "o do t!at/
$!e e5ation or or particlar problem? 200 mL of Genesee river water was collected from jst below t!e brewer" 2 mL of river water dilted to 1 L, aerated and seeded $!e dissolved o%"&en content was '( m&)L initiall" *fter + da"s, t!e dissolved o%"&en content !ad dropped to + m&)L *fter 20 da"s, t!e dissolved o%"&en content !ad dropped to +- m&)L .!at is t!e ltimate BOD/
Soltion BOD+ 7 '( m&)L + m&)L 7 +0 m&)L 2 mL)1000 mL BOD20 7 '( m&)L +- m&)L 7 12+0 m&)L 2 mL)1000 mL
BOD+ 7 813e38+ da"s99 BOD20 813e3820 da"s99 +0 7 813e38+ da"s99 12+0 813e3820 da"s99 0'@ 7 813e38+ da"s99 813e3820 da"s99
0'@ 7 813e38+ da"s99
813e3820 da"s99
0'@ 0'@ e 38209 7 1 e38+9 e38+9 0'@ e38209 7 130'@ 7 02: .e jst &rap! t!e left side as a fnction of and loo to see w!ere it e5als 02: 8or "o can se solver on "or calclator9
eA3+ 3 0'@eA20
0
02:
002+
0:21+-:
00+
0:212
00'+
0+1''1
01
0+0-@'@
012+
0:'2(''
01+
0:-:+2(
01'+
0--12
02
0-+-@
022+
0-1@21
02+
02(1-(:
02'+
02:'-:
0-
02212:@
0-2+
01+'@
0-+
01'-0(1
0-'+
01+2-+
0:
01-+0(
$!e vale is= 02( da"31 o can t!en se t!is and eit!er of t!e BOD6 to calclate ltimate BOD
BOD+ 7 BOD 813e 38+ da"s99 +0 m&)L 7 BOD 81 e 380#2(98+99 BOD 7 12@1 m&)L
Comparison to $!eoretical ;f we !ad simpl" assmed 702- da"s 31
BOD+ 7 BOD 813e 38+ da"s99 +0 m&)L 7 BOD 81 e 380#2-98+99 BOD 7 1-0 m&)L *nd, if we calclated t!e BOD from t!e 20 da" data=
G4E BOD20 7 BOD 813e3820 da"s99 12+0 m&)L 7 BOD 81 e 380#2-982099 BOD 7 12@2 m&)L $!e ltimate BOD will not a&ree since t!e is Fwron& .!ic! wold "o se/
20 da" is alwa"s better 20 da" s!old alwa"s be more accrate o are avera&in& more da"s *HD t!e reaction s!old be 0IJ complete b" t!en 8actall" J if t!e assmed is even close to correct9
Practice Problem #2 200 mL of Genesee river water was collected from jst below t!e brewer" 2 mL of river water dilted to 2+0 mL, aerated and seeded $!e dissolved o%"&en content was '@ m&)L initiall" *fter + da"s, t!e dissolved o%"&en content !ad dropped to +' m&)L * second sample was obtained @0 da"s later and retested in identical fas!ion $!e intial dissolved o%"&en was '+ m&)L and, after + da"s, dropped to +- m&)L .!at is t!e ltimate BOD for eac! of t!e samples/ .!ic! water sample was cleaner/
Soltion BOD+,1 7 '@ m&)L +' m&)L 7 2-( m&)L 2 mL)2+0 mL BOD+,2 7 '+ m&)L +- m&)L 7 2'+ m&)L 2 mL)1000 mL Can "o alread" tell w!ic! is dirtier/
Soltion Can "o alread" tell w!ic! is dirtier/ Since is constant, t!e BOD + is as &ood a measre as t!e ltimate BOD $!e 2 nd test sample is dirtier t!an t!e first
ltimate BOD calclation Sample #1
BOD+ 7 BOD 813e38+ da"s99 2-( m&)L 7 BOD 81 e 3802-98+99 2-( m&)L 7 BOD 80@(--9 BOD 7 -:( m&)L Sample #2 2'+ m&)L 7 BOD 80@(--9 BOD 7 :02 m&)L
B$ B$ B$ *lwa"s eep in mind t!e limitations of an" test? BOD is not foolproof? t!e bi&&est falt bein& t!at it will miss !ms 8non3biode&radable or&anic componds9 Generall", if it is wron&, it is too low *lt!o&! it can also erroneosl" detect c!emical o%idation of inor&anic componds 8metals9 bt t!is is smaller t!an t!e !ms problem
Konroe Cont" .ater *t!orit"
wwwmcwacom
View more...
Comments