12. Ojt Evaluation Forms (Supervised Industry Training) Sample

SUPERVISED INDUSTRY TRAINING ON-THE-JOB (OJT) TRAINING EVALUATION FORM Dear Trainees: The following questionnaire is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Supervised Industry Training (SIT) or On the Job Training (OJT) you had with your Industry Partners. Please check ( ) the appropriate box corresponding to your rating for each question asked. The results of this evaluation shall serve as a basis for improving the design and management of the SIT in SICAT to maximize the benefits of the said Program. Thank you for your cooperation. LEGEND: 5 4 3 2 1 NA

ITEM No.

1

2

3

– – – – – –

Outstanding Very Good/ Very Satisfactory Good/Adequate Fair/ Satisfactory Poor/Unsatisfactory Not Applicable

QUESTION

INSTITUTIONAL EVALUATION Conducted an orientation about the SIT/OJT program, the requirements and preparations needed and its expectations. Provided the necessary assistance such as referrals or recommendations in finding the company for your OJT. Showed coordination with the Industry partner in the design and supervision of your SIT/OJT.

4

Adequate to undertake Industry partner assignment and its challenges.

5

Monitored your progress in the Industry.

6

Has the supervision been effective in achieving your OJT objectives and providing feedbacks when necessary?

7

Conduct assessment of your SIT/OJT program upon completion.

RATINGS

1

2

3

4

5

NA

/

8

Were you provided with the results of the Industry and assessment of your OJT?

Comments/Suggestions:

RATER A

PREPARATION

Poor/UnFair/ satisfactory Satisfactory

1

2

Good/ Adequate

3

Very Good/ Outstanding Very Satisfactory

4

5

1. Workshop layout conforms with the components of a CBT workshop 2. Number of CBLM is sufficient 3. Objectives of every training session is well explained 4. Expected activities/outputs are clarified RATER B

PREPARATION

Poor/UnFair/ satisfactory Satisfactory

1 1. Workshop layout conforms with the components of a CBT workshop 2. Number of CBLM

2

Good/ Adequate

3

Very Good/ Outstanding Very Satisfactory

4

5

is sufficient 3. Objectives of every training session is well explained 4. Expected activities/outputs are clarified RATER C

PREPARATION

Poor/UnFair/ satisfactory Satisfactory

1 1. Workshop layout conforms with the components of a CBT workshop 2. Number of CBLM is sufficient 3. Objectives of every training session is well explained 4. Expected activities/outputs are clarified

2

Good/ Adequate

3

Very Good/ Outstanding Very Satisfactory

4

5

AVERAGE RATINGS PREPARATION

Average

1. Workshop layout conforms with the components of a CBT workshop 2. Number of CBLM is sufficient

3. Objectives of every training session is well explained

4. Expected activities/outputs are clarified

TOTAL

RANGE 0.00 - 1.49 =

Poor/Unsatisfactory

1.50 - 2.49 =

Fair/ Adequate

2.50 - 3.49 =

Good/Satisfactory

3.50 - 4.49 =

Very Good/Very Satisfactory

4.50 - 5.0

Outstanding

=

General Interpretation: ____________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________

Recommendation: ____________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________