10-Shear-Strength-of-Soil.pdf
Short Description
Download 10-Shear-Strength-of-Soil.pdf...
Description
CEL 610 – Founda Foundation tion Enginee Engineerin ring g
Strength of different materials
Steel
Tensile
Concrete
Compressive
Complex
Soil
Shear
Presence of pore water
Strength of different materials
Steel
Tensile
Concrete
Compressive
Complex
Soil
Shear
Presence of pore water
Shear failure of soils Soils generally fail in shear Embankment Strip footing
Failure surface Mobilized shear resistance
At failure, shear stress along the failure surface (mobilized shear resistance) reaches the shear strength. s trength.
Shear failure of soils Soils generally fail in shear
Retaining wall
Shear failure of soils Soils generally fail in shear
Retaining wall
Mobilized shear resistance Failure surface
failure surface
The soil gra over each othe the failure surf ru
Mohr-Coulomb Failure Criter in terms of total stresses
f
c tan Friction angle
Cohesion
f
c
Mohr-Coulomb Failure Crite in terms of effective stresses
f
c' ' tan '
’ Effective cohesion
c’
’
f
= pr
Effective r c on ang e
Mohr-Coulomb Failure Criterio Shear strength consists of two com onents: cohesive and frictional.
f
f ’ c’
’ c’
’
'
' f
frictional component
. ,
Mohr Circle of stress ’1
’ ’3 Soil element
’1 , ' 1
' 3
Mohr Circle of stress ’1
’ ’3
’3
Soil element
’1
1 ' 2
' 1
' 3
'
' 3
1' 3' 2
Mohr Circle of stress ’1
’ ’3
’3
Soil element
’1
’,
1 ' 2
' 1
' 3
'
' 3
1' 3' 2
Mohr Circles & Failure Envelo
Failure surface
Y X
Soil elements at different locations
c ' ' tan
X
Mohr Circles & Failure Envelo The soil element does not fail if within the envelope
c Y
c
c Initially, Mohr circle is a point
Mohr Circles & Failure Envelo As loading progresses, Mohr circle becomes larger…
c Y
c c
Orientation of Failure Plane ’1
Failure envelo ’
’3
’3
’,
f
– ’1
’ ' 3
1' 3' 2
PD = Pole w.r.t. plane
Mohr circles in terms of total & effective stre
v X
v’
h
=
X
effective stresses
u h’
+
X
total stresses
Failure envelopes in terms of total & effecti
v X
If X is on failure
v’
h
=
X
u h’
+
Failure envelope in terms of effective stresses
’ effective stresses
X
Failure terms of
total stresses
Mohr Coulomb failure criterion with Mohr cir
’v = ’1 X
Failure envelope in terms of effective stresses
’h = ’3
effectiv
’
Therefore,
c’
’
X is on failure
’
’3
’
’
’
’1 ’
Mohr Coulomb failure criterion with Mohr cir
'
' 1
' 1
' 1
'
1' 3'
' 3
' 1
'
' 3
2
'
' 3
2
in '2c' os '
' 3
1 Sin ' 1 Sin '
1' 3'
'
'
'
Cos '
1 Sin '
'
Determination of shear strength paramet , ’ ’
specimens taken from representative undisturbed samples os common a ora ory es s to determine the shear strength parameters are, 1.Direct shear test 2.Triaxial shear test
. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
ane s ear es Torvane Pocket penetro Fall cone Pressuremeter Static cone en
Laboratory tests Field conditions
A re resentative soil sample
z
vc hc
vc
vc + hc
hc vc
vc
Laboratory tests Simulating field conditions in the laboratory 0
vc 0
0
hc
0 Representative
hc
hc vc
Step 1 ep
Direct shear test c ema c
agram o
e
rec s ear appara us
Direct shear test rec s ear es s mos su a e or conso a e specially on granular soils (e.g.: sand) or stiff clays
plates
ra n
Direct shear test Preparation of a sand specimen
eve ng t e top sur ace
Pressu
Specimen prepara
Direct shear test Test procedure
P
ee
a
Pressure plate Porous plates S
Proving ri o measur shear forc
Direct shear test Test procedure
P
ee
a
Pressure plate Porous plates S
Proving ri o measur shear forc
Direct shear test Shear box
Dial gauge measure vert
Pro to sh
Loadin
frame to
Dial
au e
Direct shear test Analysis of test results
Normal stress
Shear stress
Normal force (P)
ear res stance eve ope at t e s
ng
Area of cross section of the sampl
Note: Cross-sectional area of the sample changes with the ho dis lacement
Direct shear tests on sands Stress-strain relationshi , s s r t s r a e h S
Dense sand/ c ay
f f
Loose sand/ NC clay
Shear displacement t h g i e e l h p n
n o s n a p x E
Dense sand
Direct shear tests on sands
, s e r t s r a h S
Normal stress =
3
Normal stress =
2
= f2
f1
f3
f
, e r u l i a f t a s
Shear displacement
Mohr – Coulomb failure enve
Direct shear tests on sands
Sand is cohesionless hence c = 0
drained and pore water pressures are , Therefore, ’=
and c’
Direct shear tests on clays In case of clay, horizontal displacement should be applied slow rate to allow dissipation of pore water pressure (there
Failure envelopes for clay from drained direct shear tests f
Overconsolidated clay (c’
, r u l i a f t s s e r t s r
Normally consolidated clay
’
Interface tests on direct shear apparatus n many oun a on es gn pro ems an re a n ng wa pro is required to determine the angle of internal friction betw and the structural material (concrete, steel or wood) P
Soil
Foundation material
S
Triaxial Shear Test
Piston (to apply deviatoric stre
Failure plane
O-ring impervious membrane
sample
at failure Perspex cell
Porous stone Water
Triaxial Shear Test Specimen preparation (undisturbed sample)
Triaxial Shear Test Specimen preparation (undisturbed sample)
Triaxial Shear Test Specimen preparation (undisturbed sample)
Triaxial Shear Test Specimen preparation (undisturbed sample) Provin rin to measure the deviator load Dial gauge to measure vertical displacement
Types of Triaxial Tests c
Step 1
deviatoric =
Step 2
c
c
c
c
+ c Under all-around cell pressure Is the drainage valve open?
c
Shearing (loading)
Is the drainage valve o
Types of Triaxial Tests Step 2
Step 1 -
u
u
c
Is the drainage valve open? yes
Consolidated sam le
ear ng oa ng
Is the drainage valve o
no
Unconsolidated
Drained oa ng
CD test
UU test
Und
Consolidated- drained test (CD Test) ,
,
Step 1: At the end of consolidation ’
hC
= ’hC
0
hC
Step 2: During axial stress increase VC +
Drainage
V
=
VC +
’1 hC
0
h
=
Consolidated- drained test (CD Test)
=
3=
Deviator stress (q or
)
hC
Consolidated- drained test (CD Test) Volume chan e of sam le durin consolidation
e h t f e g n a h e l e m p u m l o a
n o i s n a p E
Time n o i s e r p m o C
Consolidated- drained test (CD Test) Stre res sss-s stra rain in re rela lati tio ons nsh hi du duri rin n sh she ear arin in d
, s e r t s r o t a i v e
Dense sand d)f d)f
Loose sand or NC Clay
Axial strain e g e n l a p
n o s n a p x E
Dense sand or OC cla
CD tests
How to determine strength parameters c and 1
, s s e t s r o t a i e D
Confining stress =
on n ng s ress = Confining stress =
d)fb
d fa
Axial strain
, s s r t s r a
3c
Mohr Mo hr – Co Coul ulom omb b
3b 3a
CD tests reng
parame ers c an
Since u = 0 in CD , = ’
o
a ne
ro m
es
Therefo re, c = c’ Therefore, and = ’
cd and d are to denote th
CD tests Failure envelopes For sand and NC Clay, cd = 0
, s e r t s r a e h
d
o r – ou om failure envelope
3a
1a d fa
CD tests Failure envelopes For OC Clay, cd ≠ 0
3
1
c
Some practical applications of CD analys
1. Embankment constructed very slowly, in layers over a sof deposit
Soft clay
= in situ dra shear stre
Some practical applications of CD analys 2. Earth dam with steady state seepage
Core
= drained shea
Some practical applications of CD analys 3. Excavation or natural slope in clay
= In situ drained shear strength
Consolidated- Undrained test (CU Test) ,
, ’
Step 1: At the end of consolidation ’
hC
= ’hC =
0
hC
Step 2: During axial stress increase ’V
VC +
No drainage
hC
± u
VC
h
=
hC
Consolidated- Undrained test (CU Test) Volume chan e of sam le durin consolidation
e h t f e g n a h e l e m p u m l o a
n o i s n a p E
Time n o i s e r p m o C
Consolidated- Undrained test (CU Test) Stress-strain relationshi durin shearin d
, s e r t s r o t a i v e
Dense sand d)f d)f
Loose sand or NC Clay
Axial strain
+
Loose sand /NC Clay
u
CU tests
How to determine strength parameters c and =
, s s e t s r o t a i e D
, s s e r t r a e h S
Confining stress =
3b 3a
d fa
Total stresses Axial strain Mohr – Coulomb failure envelope in terms of total stresses
cu
CU tests
How to determine strength parameters c and ’1 = 3 + ( d)f - uf
Mohr – Coulomb failure envelo e in terms of effective stresses
, s e r t s r e h S
Mohr – Coulomb a ure enve ope n terms of total stresses
’ =
uf
3-u
Effective stresses at failure
’ cu
u
CU tests reng
parame ers c an
Shear strength parameters in terms of total stresses are ccu and cu
o
a ne
rom
es
parameters in terms of effective stresses are c’ and ’
c’ = c and
CU tests Failure envelopes or san an
ay, ccu an c =
Mohr – Coulomb failure enve ope n erms o effective stresses
, s s e r t s r a e
Mohr – Coulomb failure envelope in terms of total stresses
S 3a
’
cu
Some practical applications of CU analys 1. Embankment constructed rapidly over a soft clay deposit
Soft clay
= in situ und shear stre
Some practical applications of CU analys 2. Rapid drawdown behind an earth dam
Core
= Undrained sh
Some practical applications of CU analys 3. Rapid construction of an embankment on a natural slope
= In situ undrained shear strength Note: Total stress arameters from CU test c
and
can be
Unconsolidated- Undrained test (UU Test)
Initial specimen condition C=
No
Specimen conditio during shearing
3
=
3+
No
Initial volume of the sample = A 0 × H0 Volume of the sample during shearing = A × H Since the test is conducted under undrained condition, =
A
Unconsolidated- Undrained test (UU Test) 0
Step 2: After application of hydrostatic cell pressure ’3 = = C
No
3
=
’3
c
c
3-
uc 3
3 Increase of cell
Unconsolidated- Undrained test (UU Test) Step 3: During application of axial load ’1 =
+ drainage
3
=
’3 =
+ uc ±
d
3-
ud
ud = AB Increase of pwp due to increase of deviator stress
3+
d Increase stress
of
Unconsolidated- Undrained test (UU Test) Combining steps 2 and 3,
uc = B
ud = AB
3
d
Total pore water pressure increment at any stage, u
u = uc + ud u=B [
3+
A
d]
Unconsolidated- Undrained test (UU Test) ,
, ’ ’V0 = ur
Step 1: Immediately after sampling
0
’h0 = ur
-ur
0
’VC No drainage
r
-
C
-ur C
uc = -ur
c
’h = ur
(Sr = 100% ; B = 1)
Step 3: During application of axial load
No drainage
C
’V =
C+
+u
C C
-ur
c
± u
’h =
C+
Unconsolidated- Undrained test (UU Test) , Step 3: At failure
’Vf =
+ drainage
, ’
C
-ur
c
± uf
C
+
f +
ur -
c
’hf = C + u = ’3f
Mohr circle in terms of effective stresses do not depend on pressure. Therefore, we get only one Mohr circle in terms of effective s different cell pressures
Unconsolidated- Undrained test (UU Test) , Step 3: At failure
’Vf =
+ drainage
, ’
C
-ur
c
± uf
C
+
f +
ur -
’hf = C + u = ’3f
Mohr circles in terms of total stresses Failure envelope,
c
c
Unconsolidated- Undrained test (UU Test) Effect of degree of saturation on failure envelope
S < 100%
3c
3b
S > 100%
c
3a
b
a
Some practical applications of UU analys 1. Embankment constructed rapidly over a soft clay deposit
Soft clay
= in situ und shear stre
Some practical applications of UU analys 2. Large earth dam constructed rapidly with no change in water content of soft clay
Core
= Undrained sh
Some practical applications of UU analys 3. Footing placed rapidly on clay deposit
= In situ undrained shear strength
Unconfined Compression Test (UC Test) 1=
VC
+
=0
Unconfined Compression Test (UC Test) 1=
VC
+
3=
f
, s e r t s r a h S
0 qu
Normal s
Various correlations for shear strength For NC clays, the undrained shear strength (c u) increases w effective overburden pressure, ’0
cu
'
0.11 0.0037( PI )
Skempton (1957)
Plasticity Index as a % For OC clays, the following relationship is approximately true
(OCR) Overconsolidated Normally Consolidat ed u ' 0
u ' 0
0.8
Ladd (
Shear strength of partially saturated soils In the previous sections, we were discussing the shear str saturated soils. However, in most of the cases, we will e
Water
Pore water pressure, u
Air
press
ore press Effective stress, ’
Effec stres
Shear strength of partially saturated soils Bishop (1959) proposed shear strength equation for unsaturated soils as follows
f
c'( n ua )
(ua
u w )tan '
Where, n –
ua
u –u
= Net normal stress = Matric suction
= a parameter depending on the degree of saturation ( = 1 for fully saturated soils and 0 for dry soils)
Fredlund et al (1978) modified the above relationship as follows
f
c'( n ua ) tan '(ua u w ) tan
b
, tan
b=
Rate of increase of shear strength with matric suction
Shear strength of partially saturated soils
f
c'( n ua ) tan '(ua u w ) tan
Same as saturated soils
b
Apparent cohesion
Therefore, strength of unsaturated soils is much higher than the strength
’
- ua
How
f
it
'
become
n
a
Same as saturated soils
possible
'
a
b
w
Apparent cohesion due to matric suction
’ Apparent cohesion
- ua
View more...
Comments