Noise power= Noise power spectrum density *Bandwidth Assume bandwidth=20MHz Effective bandwidth =18MHz Noise power (dB)=-174dBm/Hz+10log(18 106) =-174+72.6=-101.4dBm
Receiver sensitivity Reference Sensitivity
NF +10log(No) +10log(Bandwidth) +SNR
D
Urban
Morph
S
R
Highway
kbps
512
512
384
128
256
Assign # Resource Blocks
#
10
10
6
3
4
Used Bandwidth
KHz
1800
1800
1080
540
720
eNode-B Noise Figure
dB
3
3
3
3
3
-174.0
-174.0
-174.0
-174.0
Cell Edge User Throughput
No dBm/Hz -174.0 SINR Request eNode-B Sensitivity
dB
-4.0
-3.8
-2.5
-2
-1.8
dBm
-112.4
-112.2
-113.2
-115.7
-114.2
UL interference margin
UL interference margin
UL Interference Margin
The Interference Margin is the interference rise over that of thermal noise due to other cell interference
Typical IM target considered in LTE link budgets is 3dB
Own cell signal
Required Received Signal Request SINR Interference level
Other cell interference
Noise
Interference Margin
UL Interference Margin
30
) B25 d ( 20 e s i 15 R e 10 s i o 5 N
50% cell load 3dB Noise Rise
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Cell Load (%)
80
90
10 0
eNode B antenna gain
eNode B antenna gain
eNode B antenna gain
General antenna selection recommend for 2 way receive Based on the engineering experience
Antenna Gain is about 18dBi
Horizontal Half-power Beam Width is about 65
Vertical Vertical Half-power Beam Width is about 7
Adjust Electrical Down tilt is by hand or by optional RCU (Remote Control Unit)
For the Polarization in dense urban, urban and suburban is X pol, rural areas can use vertical pol.
Some case to cover highway or railway, rai lway, it can select higher gain and narrower beam width antenna, (for example 21dBi and beam width is about 33 )
Four Antenna configuration way Case1
Case2
Case3
Four Antenna configuration way
Case2
Four Antenna configuration way
Case3
Four Antenna configuration way
Link level simulaiton
Four Antenna configuration way ural Highway Dense Urban Urban Suburban R ural Cell Edge User Throughput kbps 512
512
384
128
256
Num. of Tx antenna
#
1
1
1
1
1
Num. of Rx antenna
#
4
4
4
4
4
Assign # Resource Blocks
#
10
10
6
3
4
MCS
#
3
3
4
2
4
TBS
bit
568
568
408
144
256
Case1 SINR Request
dB
-7.2
-7.0
-6.8
-6.5
-5.6
Case2 SINR Request
dB
-5.4
-4.5
-3.3
-4.4
-3.8
Case3 SINR Request
dB
-4.0
-3.8
-2.5
-2
-1.8
SINR Request
Four Antenna configuration way
D Morph
Dense Rural
Urban S
R
Highway
km
0.50
0.71
2.32
9.77
12.30
km
0.44
0.61
1.83
8.45
10.86
km
0.40
0.58
1.74
7.17
9.47
urban, Urban and Suburban use Case3
and Highway can use Case2 if the situation permitted
Coverage
Cable & connector losses
Cable & connector losses
Cable and connector loss Each Connector Insertion Loss typical 0.05dB
TMA gain TMA also called Mast Head Amplifier (MHA) (MHA) Impact on link budget Reduces global Noise Figure Compensate cable losses The gain on link budget related to:
Cable loss eNode NF TMA amplifier gain TMA NF
0.5 dB additional insertion loss on DL
Antenna
Jumper Cable
Dual TMA Duplexer
LNA Duplexer
Duplexer
LNA
Feeder
Duplexer
Jumper Cable
TX / RX
eNode-B
TXdiv / RXdiv
Shadowing margin
Shadowing margin
Shadowing Margin
Shadowing Standard Deviation
10 dB
8 dB
7 dB
6 dB
Cell Area Coverage Probability
95%
90%
95%
90%
95%
90%
95%
90%
Cell Edge Coverage Probability
87.7 %
77.7 %
86.2 %
75.1 %
84.9 %
73.3 %
83.9 %
70.9 %
Shadowing Margin
11.7 dB
7.7 dB
8.7 dB
5.4 dB
7.2 dB
4.3 dB
5.9 dB
3.3 dB
Dense urban, Urban and Suburban Shadowing Standard Deviation is 8dB
Rural and Highway Shadowing Standard Deviation is 6dB
Handoff gain
Handoff gain
Hard handover Gain
The hard handover gain is the value to reduce the shadowing margin
The hard handover gain is related to handoff hysteresis thresholds, connection delays, coverage probability targets and shadowing standard deviations
The simulation result shows that the hard handover gain is about 2~4dB
Cost231-Hata (UP to1.5GHz) Path Loss (dB) = 46.3 + 33.9 x log (f) – 13.82 x log(hb) – a(hm) +[44.9 – 6.55 x log (hb)] x log (R) + Kc
Okumura-Hata(150 MHz to 1500 MHz ) Path Loss (dB) = 69.55 + 26.16 x log (f) – 13.82 x log(hb) – a(hm) +[44.9 – 6.55 x log (hb)] x log (R) + Kc Where f
= Frequency of Transmission
hb
=Base station Antenna Height (m)
hm R
MHz
=UE Antenna Antenna Height (m) , 1.5m is normal.
= Distance between the base and UE (km)
Kc
= Morphology correction factor
a(hm)
:Ant height correction factor = (1.1 x log (f) –0.7) x hm - (1.56 x log (f) –0.8)
Inter site distance and coverage area
Inter site distance and coverage area
UL Link budget
Contents
FDD-LTE link budget overview
FDD-LTE UL Link budget
FDD-LTE DL Link Budget
Cell radius and areas
Different of UL and DL link budget Own cell signal Adjacent cell interference
UL
DL
Noise
Required Received Signal Request SINR
DL can not use same LB method With UL
DL link budget Methodology
DL Link budget character
.
1 1 5.5 0 00 E
1 1 5.5 1 67 E
3 8 . 8 1 6 7 N
N 7 6 1 8 . 8 3
3 8 . 8 0 0 0 N
N 0 0 0 8 . 8 3
.
1 1 5.5 0 00 E
1 1 5 .5 1 6 7E
. .
Assume: Adjacent site power load: 50% Geometry factor at cell edge :3dB
) t B a d e ( s e i r g e d s e i l o l N e c
Dense urban cell range (km)
DL link budget approach Cell range Other parameters
MAPL
MIMO Conf.
SINR
G factor
Assign RB #
MCS&TBS Cell edge throughput
Request cell range
Throughput at cell edge
DL Link budget
Request cell range
DL Link budget MIMO configuration eNode B Tx Power Same with UL
DL shadowing Margin
Shadowing Margin on signal Shadowing Standard Deviation
8 dB
6 dB
Cell Area Coverage Probability
95%
90%
95%
90%
Cell Edge Coverage Probability
86.2%
75.1%
83.9%
70.9%
Shadowing Margin
Shadowing Standard Deviation 8dB
8.7 dB 5.4 dB 5.9 dB 3.3 dB
95% signal margin 8.7dB
DL Link budget
Adjacent cell power loading
Adjacent Tx Power load Assume: Cell range : 500m Geometry factor at cell edge :3dB
l l ) e c B d t ( a e R g N d I e S
Adjacent cell Rx Power load(%)
Adjacent cell Rx Power load(%)
0
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
SINR @cell edge(dB)
7.24
4.11
2.31
1.04
0.06
-0.74
-1.42
-2.00
-2.52
-2.98
-3.39
DL Link budget
Geometry at cell edge
Geometry factor Not related to ISD
Geometry
Rx Power Serving Site
Rx Power Adjacent Site All
System level simulation
8 9
19 18
10
2 7
3 11
17 6 16
1
4 12
5 15
13 14
5%CDF is cell edge G factor is -3dB
DL Link budget
SINR at cell edge
SINR
l l ) e c B d t ( a e R g N d I e S Assume: Adjacent site power load: 50% Geometry factor at cell edge :3dB
Thank you for interesting in our services. We are a non-profit group that run this website to share documents. We need your help to maintenance this website.