00 Birth Trust Guide - 25 Dec 2018

March 2, 2023 | Author: Anonymous | Category: N/A
Share Embed Donate


Short Description

Download 00 Birth Trust Guide - 25 Dec 2018...

Description

Page 1 of 21

 

Birth Registraon Trust Forget everything you think you know, look at things through the eyes of equity...

Page 2 of 21

 

Contents Part 1 – Birth Trust Process Secon 1 – Public Administrave Process

Page

Secon 2 – Private Administrave Process

Page

Secon 3 – Enforcement

Page

Part 2 – Birth Trust Guide Secon 1 – Introducon and History

Page

1.1 Introducon 1.2 History of the Problem and Right to Remedy Secon 2 – Establishment 2.1 Crical Elements 2.2 Registraon Process 2.3 Moving Titles 2.4 Express Trust 2.5 Mistake Due to Ignorance 2.6 Private and Public 2.7 Birth Trust Process 2.8 Wring the Documents 2.9 Giving Noce 2.10 Reasons for Nocing These Ocers

Page

2.11 Conclusion Secon 3 – Enforcement 3.1 Authority and Law Form 3.2 Categories of the use of the word Jurisdicon 3.3 Equity Jurisprudence 3.4 Finding the Equity Jurisdicon 3.5 Accessing the Equity Jurisdicon 3.6 Proceedings in Equity 3.7 Draing pleadings 3.8 Resources

Page

Secon 4 – Administraon of the Birth Trust 4.1 Administraon 4.2 Breach of trust aer establishment and enforcement 4.3 Change of Status 4.4 Purpose of Expressing the Birth Trust 4.5 What you need to know to use Trust and Equity Procedures 4.6 Other Processes and Concepons 4.7 Dierences in Jurisdicons and Birth Trust Processes 4.8 Quesons to Answer

Page

Secon 5 - Document and Record Keeping Instrucons 5.1 All Documents 5.2 Condenal Documents 5.3 Leers / Legal Communicaon 5.4 Principles for Procedure

Page

Secon 6 – Appendix 6.1 Disclaimer / Trust Example 6.2 Diagrams and Explanaons 6.3 Document Types and their required elements 6.4 Glossary of Terms

Page

 

Page 3 of 21

Part 2 – Birth Trust Guide Secon 1 – Introducon and History 1.1 Introducon

This guide is intended to contain everything necessary in order to perform the birth trust establishment and enforcement process for full enjoyment of benecial rights related to one’s relaonship with government. If any further informaon is needed by any individual, discuss it with the author / grantor of this informaon. All are entled to these rights but not all will chose to perform the process or perform it correctly and achieve the desired outcome either through a lack of ability, misunderstanding the concepts or a lack of honour or integrity. It is the intent of the author that all who read this guide have the best opportunity to fully g grasp rasp the concepts and clearly understand the purpose of the process it describes and the problem it solves. Further, this guide is compiled from informaon and concepts from Chrisan Walters’ materials, for beer and further understanding the reader is advised to review these materials which should be able to be obtained from the individual who shared this guide with you. It is important to understand the cconcepts oncepts and the problem it is aempng to solve and to prepare all the documents and records necessary to take the maer all the way through enforcement, before taking the rst step.

1.2 History of the Problem and Right to Remedy (The naonal insolvency and administraon, historical reasoning, proofs and evidence.)

Australia: 1. The colonies of Terra Australis (Australia before federaon) borrowed money of substance from the Bank B ank of England to fund their parcipaon in the Boer Wars of 1883-1886 with the colonies being jointly or individually liable for their poron of the debt. Evidenced by the documentaon for the loans held at the naonal archives. 2. When they lost the Boar Wars and subsequently couldn’t repay the debt, they constuted a naon and consolidated their individual porons of the debt and also assigned an interest in their assets to the new federaon government. Evidenced by the constuon secon …… constung the colonies debt into a federal body, and the documentaon for the pledges of their assets each colony c olony made are held at the Naonal Archives. 3. Federal government then negoated perpetuaon of the loans from f rom the Bank of England and borrowed more money to fund the naon and later agreed in 1931 to a reserve currency issued by the privately owned reserve bank of Australia which came into eect in 1933. (and further negoated aer that) (who owns the Reserve Bank of Australia?) Evidenced by the Commonwealth Bank Acts, Reserve Bank of Australia Act, Acons of government borrowing from the Reserve Bank of Australia. 4. The ‘Commonwealth Government of Australia’ started operang as the ‘Australian Government’ in 1973. Evidenced by the Royal Sles and Titles Act 1974, Change of seals on all tles, all government g overnment laws and oces and records of their acons. (Referendum in 1969 remove references to the queen) 5. The ‘money’ in Australia changed from a Bill of Exchange (exchange of rights to substance now) backed by Gold and Silver which can fully sele a debt to a promissory note (Promise to pay in the ffuture) uture) backed by all the goods and services and property registered in the domesc economy (full (f ull faith and credit of the people) which obfuscates and hypothecates all the people’s property to be held as surety for the debt of the naon. Evidenced by the change in the wring on the money from ‘redeemable in gold or silver’ with a guarantee by the treasurer, to ‘shall be accepted as legal tender’ and the addion of the issuing party, the Reserve Bank Governor and an underwring by the Treasurer. Government Bonds are also backed by the full faith and credit of the people. 6. Money and currency or legal tender are both just a means of exchange between producers and consumers, however money in the form of a ‘Bill of Exchange’ is a document which entles the bearer to redeem some substanve property held elsewhere and upon transfer of it from one party to another, the receiving party becomes owner of the property immediately upon receipt, whereas currency or legal tender in the form of a

 

Page 4 of 21 ‘Promissory Note’ although being legislavely authorised as a legally acceptable method of payment and thus discharge of one’s legal obligaons, it sets o that debt into the future via a promise to pay at a later unassigned date. 7. Because there is no lawful money in circulaon backed by anything of value (gold or silver), no commercial contracts can be fully honoured at payment as we can't actually "pay" for anything with any real credit instrument i.e. "lawful money". Thus the only way we can fully and permanently sele debts is via exnguish by merger of tles in a Trust relaonship. 8. This le the people in the situaon of not being able to fully and permanently sele any debts by paying with money and can only set-o their debts into the future via the use of promissory notes to ‘pay’. Evidenced by: the issuance of bills of exchange by the treasurer and promissory notes by the Reserve Bank and the nature and custom of such instruments which is also recognised by negoable instruments law. 9. If the ability to fully sele debts by money of substance is absent, another method to fully sele debts in the present must be provided. 10. Therefore being in this situaon, the people are denied the ability to remain in honour by fully seling their debts which is a form of involuntary servitude and a right arises to the exnguishment of their debts via a special arrangement which makes it necessary and desirable to enable administraon of the Birth Trust. Evidenced by: It is against the Imperial Acts and their state Applicaon Acts (Magna Carta containing the Bill of rights England) to hold someone as surety for a debt and not allow or provide a way for them to full the debt now. 11. Debt and administraon meline: 1883 (Boer war debt borrowed)  50yrs(jubilee and opportunity to renegoate)  1933 (Reserve Bank of Australia established - Reserve Currency)  50 yrs(jubilee and opportunity to renegoate)  1973 (‘Commonwealth Government of Australia’ became ‘Australian Government’) (US history – War for independence, Constuon of US, Treaty of Paris - administraon, Roosevelt’s new deal renegoaon, Reserve Bank of America established 1933, HJR192)

Secon 2 - Establishment Preliminary: For establishment and administraon of the trust relaon and in order to operate appropriately one needs to be aware of the structure and hierarchy of power and authority within the execuve branch of government. (For: registraon of birth process; all public accounts administered for the benet of one’s legal identy, applicaon of separaon of powers principle and pracce of it, trustee’s private capacity and authority  a uthority  to administer legal tles and the private trust relaon).

2.1 Crical Elements

1. Expressing the trust. 2. Performing the merger of the legal and equitable tles. 3. Full Accounng or (Tracing and Marshalling) of Assets and Debts. 4. Distribuon of the res to the beneciary. 2.2 Registraon Process

1. Survey 2. Registraon 3. Title (on the register) 4. Cercate of tle (Birth Cercate) Your Birth registraon is the basis for your relaonship with government. Currently, it is a guardian and ward relaon but one can express that it is our intent for it to be a trust and treat it as a trust and enforce it as a trust in a court of equity for the exnguishment of all the debt related to it. A survey contains four things: 1. Name (Owner) 2. ID 3. Meets and Bounds 4. Type of Ownership (private or public), once a survey is registered it becomes a tle to the property. Register means to pass legal tle, and establishes a relaonship between the party accepng the registraon and the applicant. This relaonship can be construed under a one tle theory being a guardian and ward relaon or through an expression of the Grantor’s intent it can be construed under a two tle theory being a trust relaon. The two tles in a trust relaon are the legal tle and an equitable tle. If one was to establish a trust relaon which recognizes these tles, then one could enjoy the benets of such.

 

Page 5 of 21 Benecial rights cannot be recognized by law and are only enforceable in equity. Therefore one must establish a trust to exercise benecial rights and to be able to rely on enforceability of such rights. In order to establish such rights, one needs to establish a trust relaon exists. 2.3 Moving Titles

Create, Claim, Transfer, Noce, Enforce 1. Create a tle to the res if one does not exist. 2. Claim the res using the tle  tle and give noce. 3. Transfer the res to the trustee by way of record of a past event and give noce of the grantor’s intent. 4. Noce the party holding res that they are trustee and order the trust dues performed. 5. Enforce in a court of equity for a declaratory judgement or a breach of trust if the trustee fails to perform.

2.4 Express Trust

A trust is anything that the law will recognise as a trust. No specic words are necessary to form a trust; a trust is present if the circumstances contemplated by the pares’ intent full the elements of a valid trust. In order for a trust to be valid it needs all four elements of a trust and at least one method of formaon. Elements of a Trust: 1. Intent 2. Purpose 3. Pares 4. Specic Property Methods of Formaon: 1. Declaraon 2. Transfer 3. Appointment 4. Contract “The elements of a trust are: (i) trust intent; (ii) specic trust res; (iii) properly designated pares; and (iv) a valid trust purpose. The principal methods of creang a trust are by: (i) declaraon; (ii) transfer (during lifeme or by will), 4 ways to transfer delivery, assignment, acceptance, by operaon of law; (iii) exercise of power of appointment, and; (iv) contract.”  –  – (Gilbert’s Law summaries: Trust - page ……) ……)

An example of the verbiage for forming such a relaon can be given as: “I hereby grant ( certain property  .....................................)  .....................................) to ( Trustee …………………) for the benet of (Beneciaries ..............................) for the purpose of ( Purpose ..............................).” If one was to ll in the blanks above, a valid trust would exist based on the presence of the elements required to form a valid trust. For the trust deed to be recognised as valid, it needs other vericaons such as being signed sealed and delivered. Then the grantor's will and intent in relaon to said trust would be enforceable in the jurisdicon that the registraon was made. Your Birth registraon is the basis for your relaonship with state and federal g government, overnment, it is currently a guardian and ward relaon but one can express that it is our intent for it to be a trust and treat it as a trust and enforce it as a trust in a court of equity for the exnguishment of all the debt related to it. 2.5 Mistake Due to Ignorance The registraon of your birth was done by your parents on your behalf and one can only grant that which they are entled to. Therefore since your parents never possessed equitable rights to you and they were only a trustee of you (your guardian) unl you achieve age of majority, you possess the equitable entlement to that which was registered and any and all proceeds created therefrom. One can therefore claim that one’s relaonship with government has been operang under a mistaken construcon of one’s intent resulng from one’s mistake of not correcng it unl now due to one’s ignorance of such. 2.6 Private and Public

Private is anything which is expressed or implied to be special. When have you expressed or implied anything to be special? Be very careful what you grant to others especially when signing your name. Signing by Grantor reserves special private rights and if this is unacceptable to the receiver, an ellipsis (…) can be used to denote further informaon is missing from the document, which indicates the signing party’s intent. Everything else is public by default, something is only private if you have expressed or implied a special relaon over it. A condence or a trust is a special relaon, and only if you express or imply a condence or a trust can you claim by your intent in forming the relaon that the subject of such relaon can be private.

 

Page 6 of 21 The informaon about a trust or condence relaon is only private when it relates to how the trust operates or informaon about the trust or the contents of trust documents. The fact that a private trust relaon exists, who the pares are and the existence of trust documents are not necessary to keep private and can be made public. The contents however cannot, i.e. the res of the trust and the words used in the trust instruments and private noces.

2.7 Birth Trust Process

The root trust establishment process requires at least 3 public steps and at least 3 private steps, put simply they are public and private noces and a Deed and Indenture. The enforcement process requires all the documents necessary for an originang process for breach of trust including evidence and any authories relied on. The three public steps are: 1. Noce of claiming and transferring tle via UCC1 and UCC3 noce registraons. 2. Second noce in a publicaon or registry recognised as valid for legal noces. 3. Noce directly to the original receiver of the registraon applicaon (Births Registrar). The three private steps are: 1. Create a deed of trust. 2. Create a trust indenture. 3. Send noce of the trust to the trustee. 2.8 Wring the Documents In trust, we: Declare, Grant, Order, and Direct. For example I hereby; Declare - public side steps, Grant - certain property, Order - trust dues, Direct – trustee to perform

Public process documents: 1. UCCs: Declaraons 2. Public Noces: Declaraons 3. Noce direct to Birth Registry: Declaraons Private process documents: 1. Deed of Trust: Grantor Grants property and powers to the trustee. 2. Indenture: Grantor Orders Trustee to execute the powers of the trust in certain ways. 3. Noce of Interest: Beneciary Directs the Trustee to perform the trust dues. 3 Step private noce process: 1. Noce of Interest and Express Trust 2. Noce of Breach of Trust 3. Cercaon of Breach of Trust 2.9 Giving Noce

Send the Private Noce via registered post to the Head Ocers of the 3 Federal and 3 State Government Branches: State Government: Head of Execuve - (Secretary to DPC) D PC) or state administrator/special minister Head of legislave - Legislave Council/Senate, noce to Aorney general + Governor Head of Judicial - Supreme Court Chief Jusce - Execuve of the Judicial Administrave Council? Back Oce Accountant - Secretary of the Treasury, (Head administrave ocer of the Treasury) Governor - Send a copy of the private noce with unique cover leer stang it has been sent to all three branches. (Commonwealth countries only)

 

Page 7 of 21 Send copies of the public noce noc e to the Government Departments for State Benets or Licenses or Accounts A ccounts for dealing with State Government. Federal Government: Head of Execuve - (Secretary to PMC) PM C) or Commonwealth administrator/special minister of state Head of Legislave - Commonwealth Senate , noce to Aorney general + Governor General Head of Judicial - HC CJ - …………… + Privy Council/Queens Bench, Judicial Administrave Council? Back Oce Accountant - Secretary of the Treasury, (Head administrave ocer of the Treasury) Governor General - Send a copy of the private noce with unique cover leer stang it has been sent to all three branches. (Commonwealth countries only) Send copies of the public noce noc e to – Social Security (Department for Human Services - Medicare no., CRN), (ATO - TFN, ABN / IRS - TIN, EIN USA), Birth Register (Registrar of Births Deaths and Marriages - B.C., BRS / Director of Vital Stascs - B.C., Long Form USA) – Passport (Department of Foreign Aairs and Trade / Secretary of State USA) 2.10 Reasons for Nocing These Ocers

Private Noce to the Three Heads of each branch of State and Federal Governments eecvely puts the government on noce and recognizes that the separaon of powers means that the heads of the separate branches of government need separate noce, as they share responsibility. However, noce to one trustee is noce to all trustees and noce to principle is noce to agent. Noce to the Back oce Accountant is to eecvely Noce the party within or acng on behalf of the Governments being responsible for and having the control over the accounts oce which has the capacity to provide the accounng. Public Noces to Government Departments are to eecvely put on noce those pares who we can idenfy have a reason to be made aware of the existence of the private relaon as acc accounts ounts relate to them. 2.11 Conclusion

Once these steps are performed correctly, the beneciary is entled to enforce in a court of equity if the trust is not executed. The Trustee will likely disclaim the Trust and if this occurs we will need to enforce it on the execuve branch by exercising the power of the judicial branch through a court of inherent equity. Enforcement of non-statutory private trusts is solely in the trust er of the exclusive heading of the original inherent equity jurisdicon because the beneciary of and benecial rights to a private express trust cannot be seen at law (Pomeroy secon 218, 219).

Secon 3 - Enforcement Preliminary: For enforcement of the trust relaon and in order to operate the courts and their jurisdicons appropriately one needs to be aware of the structure and hierarchy of power and authority within the judicial branch of government.

(For: nding the original equity jurisdicon in the birth state and which court is currently exercising it; accessing the court’s procedures and powers; originang, maintaining and compleng an acon solely in the exclusive  jurisdicon of equity; enjoining pares pares at the federal level o off government and seeking high higher er judicial power to make the trust orders valid against them.)

3.1 Authority and Law Form

Government exists primarily to protect property rights. So, in a property maer all that needs to be claimed and proven is; this is my property, I have a right to this property, give me my property. The Government has three branches; Legislave, Execuve and Judicial and the primary funcon of the Judicial branch, which is superior to the other two, is to keep the other two branches within their granted authority and the law. Hierarchy of Authority: God  Man  Government  Corporaons and Enes God created man therefore man cannot be greater than God. Man created government therefore Government cannot be greater than man. Government created corporaons and enes therefore corporaons and

 

Page 8 of 21 enes cannot be greater than government. Operang under a general g eneral deposit one tle theory in the oce of  an enty, one cannot be greater than government, g overnment, but under a special deposit two tle theory in trust as a man/woman one can be greater than government. The Hierarchy of Law: 1. Equity - what is based on "good conscience and good reason": (a) Exclusive equity - which has three ers: (i) Trusts, (ii) Specic performance (iii), Fraud, mistake, omission and accident. (b) Concurrent equity. (c) Auxiliary equity. 2. Common Law - "the law" (the English system based on the "will of the people") 3. Statutes (created by government, but must be "in accordance with law", that is, the Common Law) 3.2 Categories of the use of the word Jurisdicon

Geographical Locaon, Over the Person, Hierarchy of Courts, Subject maer, Area of Law, Equity and Law, Common Law and Statute. 3.3 Equity Jurisprudence

Equity is that which is fair, just and right and which in good conscience should be done. A court of equity administers claims by applying the maxims, principles and doctrines of equity which were developed by the old English courts of chancery prior to the three Judicature Acts of 1873-1876. For enforcement of a private trust you need to know which court the jurisdicon of Equity is vested in. The original jurisdicon of Equity to be used for the root trust for Australians is in the supreme court of the State your birth was registered in. The court of equity operates by the principles, maxims, doctrines and adjudicaon procedures of equity and not by the law, so a pleading made in this jurisdicon would rely for its merits on the authoritave learned opinions of the authors of textbooks on equity and not laws or precedents and one would do this by referencing the secons of such books which dene the principle or maxim one is claiming. The maxims are the ‘Legum Leges’ or ‘Laws of Laws’ and are the proof and need no proving, however there are always nuances and condional excepons to a certain maxim which may apply and the applicaon of the other maxims to the point at issue. 3.4 Finding the Equity Jurisdicon

For enforcement of the birth trust you need to know where the jurisdicon of Equity is in the state your birth was registered and this is how to nd the Inherent Equity Jurisdicon in your State: 1. Find the original documents that convey the judicial power in the colony your state once was and nd out if it conveyed an inherent equity jurisdicon into the colony. If so, that should be the inherent equity you’re looking for, then then you need to nd where where equity is now administered in the modern courts. 2. According to the US constuon and federal instruments, in a general sense equity is administered by the state circuit courts. 3. Then the state judicial administrave council may have moved it. The history of their acons in seng or moving jurisdicons will let you know if they moved the jurisdicon or set special terms for Equity sings. 4. The historical record for the judicial council for the state or an annotated textbook about same should indicate when and how this was done. 5. One can also ask a law librarian. (This is for the USA - For a Commonwealth realm country it should be in the Supreme Court - but you have to check by researching the history of the equity jurisdicon of the geographical area your birth was registered in. For other countries, the same methods can be employed to research this queson, but it needs to be done to ensure you are ling in the right court, i.e. one which possesses the inherent jurisdicon of equity.)

 

Page 9 of 21 If you currently reside outside the state you were registered in, you may be able to send your originang process applicaon to your birth state court of equity and appear at any hearings via teleconference from a court in the state you reside in. You may also be able to get a court of equity in the state you reside to exercise the jurisdicon of the court of equity in your birth state and take on the whole maer itself. 3.5 Accessing the Equity Jurisdicon

To access the jurisdicon of Equity you must make a claim which is cognizable in exclusive equity (claim and relief are in exclusive equity jurisdicon), and it must be made in a court which possesses the inherent equity  jurisdicon. There may be other requirements in order for the court to hear purely equitable maers such as not having any legal claims, seng a special term, overcoming the other party's objecons and equies, being in breach of any of the restricve maxims, not specically pleading and proving all the necessary elements of your case, not seeking relief that the court can grant for any reason. You cannot mix equity and trust methods with any other methods or it may not be enforceable. You can however switch to these methods at any point. How to get into Equity: 1. Plead Special Maers (Exigent Circumstances, Special Relaon) 2. Cause of Acon (1 of the 33 Children of Equity - sec 25 Gibson’s Suits in Chancery) 3. Relief Orders Sought (something only Equity can provide i.e. Discovery, Injuncon, Specic Performance - Exclusive Equity) It is always in the hands of the court to set jurisdicon, it is the court's power and prerogave and the court will set by thethe jurisdicon sees twhat by the subject maer suit is in the cause of paperwork. acon and the sought applicantas noit maer the applicant saysoforthe asks forwhich or has their ling It isrelief a steadfast principle that the cause of acon and relief are the two things which always sets the jurisdicon of the court for proceedings and these are the substance of the case and the court will determine and decide this for itself from what is submied in the peoning party's pleadings. The cause of acon usually arises from a grievance under a relaon between the pares to the suit. The court will however look to an instrument governing a relaon to see if there is an agreement to a certain jurisdicon or court for the resoluon of disputes arising from that relaon but this does not prevent a party to said relaon from peoning any appropriate jurisdicon of any appropriate court under any other exisng right that they possess. Challenge to jurisdicon can usually be brought up at any me by any party to a suit and the court must hear and determine such a challenge immediately. Most court rules have a secon dening these procedures. 3.6 Proceedings in Equity

The three preliminary steps to consider before proceedings in equity are: 1. Find where Equity is administered in the jurisdicon of the registraon. 2. Use the modern combined rules, forms , Acts and pracse direcons (ordinary court procedure) to iniate proceedings for breach of trust. 3. Apply for a sealing of the record to protect the private trust maers from the general public. The plain sets the jurisdicon for any a ny acon and there are two things which work together to set the  jurisdicon of any maer and they they are the cause of acon and the relief sought. Two things a proceeding in equity must adhere to in order to access the exclusive jurisdicon are: 1. The cause of acon must be one which is within the exclusive jurisdicon of equity, i.e. a trust breach. 2. The relief sought must be in a form which is only exercisable by the jurisdicon of equity, i.e. specic performance of the trust. Therefore the enforcement of a trust established under a mistaken construcon of intent must be made in the exclusive jurisdicon of equity of a court possessing such, for the court to be able to exercise this jurisdicon, recognise the trust and mistaken construcon and issue the specic performance orders sought. 3.7 Draing pleadings

 

Page 10 of 21 When draing pleadings, present the facts that establish the rights you possess and then establish that the rights entle you to the relief you seek. Follow the court rules and forms for an originang process for the form of the ling and put the Bill in Equity pleadings in this format. The theory of the Bill in Equity is to prove the establishment of the trust and prove the entlement to specic performance of the trust dues. Therefore the bill needs to prove trust and ask for validaon of trust, and then show the rights and dues of the trustee, claim a breach of trust and prayer for specic performance of such. A Judge wants to see these three things answered in a pleading: 1. What do you want?' - Recognion of trust, grant relief by restraining breach of trust and specic performance of the trust dues; 2. Why should the Judge give it to you?' - Establish the relaon, rights and dues, violaon, damage caused; 3. How can the Judge give it to you?' - Establish relaon and rights exist in jurisdicon, power of court to exercise jurisdicon, grant the relief sought. Your Bill in Equity must include these things: 1. Sealing of the record 2. Seng Jurisdicon by relaon 3. State the cause of acon 4. Prove Trust and claim a breach of trust by the non-performance of the trustee dues. 5. Prove the Equies between the pares and State the Facts Specically. 6. Applicaon of the maxims and principles of Equity in support of the reasoning. 7. Plead entlement to the relief sought that is exclusively in Equity (Specic performance) 3.8 Resources

Resources for court procedure: Read your birth state equity court's act and rules for; originang process, evidence, procedure, demurrers and relief. Equity Court Act, Rules and Pracse Direcons. D irecons. A text book on Civil Procedure for your birth state. Jurisdiconary. Resources for authors principles and maxims:who are learned authories to quote in support of the applicaon of trust and equitable Trusts: Gilbert Law Summaries: Trusts, Edward Halbach Jr (black/statutory Trusts). Lewin - A Praccal Trease on the Law of Trusts (1889) (white/private Trusts). Ausn Wakeman Sco - Sco on trust Equity: The Maxims of Equity from various authors - The maxims are the ‘legum leges’ (laws of laws), they are the proof and need no proving. The maxim, equity regards as done what ought to be done is the source of all equitable property and legal tles Pomeroy - A Trease of Equity Jurisprudence (1905) (the 'bible for Equity' in theory/philosophy) Sir Henry Gibson – A Trease on Suits in Chancery (1905) (the 'bible in equity' for applicaon in courts). Joseph Story - Commentaries on Equity Pleadings, and the Incidents Thereof (philosophy/theory in relaonship for court proceedings).

 

Page 11 of 21 Charles E. Phelps - Juridical Equity Abridged, for the use of students (maxims for use in Courts, e.g., enabling and restricve maxims; note, only 12/13 as dierent to the regular 20). Edmund H. T. Snell - The Principles of Equity 1885

Secon 4 – Administraon of the Birth Trust 4.1 Administraon

In the administraon of the birth trust, we are administering both the legal and equitable tles to our birth estates held by government and for each step we need to create two types of records; a noce of Intent/interest (NOI) and a statement of intent/interest (SOI). An example of this is that the public noces are NOI’s and the private noces are SOI’s. In establishment and enforcement the only thing which is necessary to explain in detail is the descripon of the property being the assets of the estate and res of the trust, the past present and future debts aached to the legal name, the birth tle registraon process and the expressed birth trust. Don’t let personality or personal issues interfere with the process. 4.2 Breach of trust aer establishment and enforcement

Once the trust is recognised and operang correctly, c orrectly, the Trustee most probably will not breach trust. However you can breach your own trust by divulging any of the private trust informaon to someone who is not a party to the trust, or by comingling which is performing a business or trade in the legal name and possibly using the trust funds for something other than the trust purpose which is solely for your maintenance. 4.3 Change of Status

The status change once the root trust process is completed is that you’ve segregated your relaonship with government from all other individuals in your country c ountry and exnguished the debt and you can no longer perform a business or trade in the domesc economy (which go hand in hand) which means you’re no longer co-mingling and are fully segregated forever more (so long as you don’t comingle back in) and no longer a debtor by default with diminished sovereignty rights. This does not mean you are a creditor or a sovereign but that you now possess all legal and equitable rights in full and without restricons such as fees and taxes secured under a trust relaon. Your maintenance can be provided for by disbursements from the trust as private sourced credit into an account for you to use for purchasing goods and services to provide for your maintenance. Real authority is the power to choose c hoose and this is only fully available under an oce possessing a benecial tle or right such as the beneciary of a trust, legal tle is merely a discreonary power at best. Trust is a two tle theory, all other processes out there in the commercial redempon movement never really gain control c ontrol of the assets created from a birth registraon because they are only claiming rights under a one tle  tle theory. In future, hold all legal property in a trust, either with the registering authority or set up a separate trust for each major item of property i.e. houses, vehicles, bank acc., passport etc. 4.4 Purpose of Expressing the Birth Trust

The purpose of performing the root trust process is to merge tles in trust for exnguishment of all past present and future debt aached to and arising from f rom your legal name, which includes all the past preconstuon war debt, all the present current naonal debt and all current and future liabilies and debts of the beneciary of the trust for life and to provide disbursements of funds into a regular bank account for this purpose. In the deed and indenture, the purpose of the trust is to convert the asset to provide for the maintenance of the beneciary. What that means is enough of a disbursement to provide for all the purchases the beneciary will make in their lifeme. Any individual purchase the beneciary makes is at the beneciary's discreon and so long as the purchase does not form part of an acvity constung a business or trade then it is in keeping with the trust purpose. The beneciary can buy anything they want for whoever they want, the disbursements are theirs to do with what they wish and not only is there no reason to make anyone else a beneciary but it will be against the necessary element of the trust purpose being segregaon from all other accounts and individuals to do so.

4.5 What you need to know to use Trust and Equity Procedures

Hierarchy of the informaon:

 

Page 12 of 21 1. Civil Procedure Law - causes of acon, court rules, evidence rules, private administrave process, NOI/SOI. 2. Trust Law / Private Trusts 3. Equity Jurisprudence 4. Moving tles plaorm, - CW 5. NTT (Merging tles in trust and exnguishing debts) – CW 6. Debtor-Creditor Law (Commercial Law - so you know what not to do) Hierarchy of authority on the informaon: 1. Real Events and Circumstances 2. Equity Authors 3. Courts and Jusce System 4. CW and the Author of this Guide

4.6 Other Processes and Concepons

There are only three pares to a trust and these are the Grantor, the Trustee and the Beneciary. All other tles are an oce exercising a dierent capacity to what this Birth Trust process uses and most oen it is a role which is an agent of the trustee. Do not mix the oces, processes and cconcepts oncepts in this Birth Trust process with any other methodology and avoid processes which seek to employ acng as or in the capacity of any of the following oces, which are not by necessity a party to a trust: Selor - Anyone exercising Grantor’s powers including the Grantor aer granng the res and the trust vesng. Grantee - Anyone receiving a grant Executor - Anyone execung Trustee dues but not necessarily the trustee All are merely an agent for a party to a trust under a legal authority. All trustees are duciaries but not all duciaries are trustees, or a party to a trust. There is no need to make any changes (including grammacally) to the name of one’s legal identy in relaon to the birth trust process outlined herein, the legal name is merely a tle poinng to certain property held privately. There are 3 ways to legally change a name: 1. By deed poll, 2. By marriage or 3. By common usage. This process requires that we idenfy by our name but this is just for common usage purposes in negoaon of the relaon and for personal jurisdicon in court. A name is just a legal tle represenng a specic real thing. You can make your name anything you want, it doesn't change anything to do with status, because its purpose in law is to be used as one of a bunch of elements which disnguish individuals from one another. 4.7 Dierences in Jurisdicons and Birth Trust Processes

The Birth Trust Process diers from what CW said to do to execute the root trust. The following is a list of such and what may be dierent for people in Commonwealth jurisdicons as opposed to American jurisdicons: 1. Public noce not to vital stascs but to the President of America. 2. Applicaon for a replacement Social Security card signed as grantor. 3. Claim the Declaraon of Independence. 4. The court of equity was pre-established in the colony - then assigned into the state and then may have been moved from there. 5. UCC1 and UCC3 second witness in the county recorder. 6. Terms not included in the process; Special Deposit, Equitable Conversion. 4.8 Quesons to Answer

Q: Why are you doing this, and why now?

 

Page 13 of 21 A: I was ignorant of my right because it has always been my intent to retain benecial rights, it was always my right as per my intent, the suspicion has now arisen and I am now coming to enforce. Q: What right do you have to make a special deposit (trust deposit)? A: The fact that you have claimed via your valid public records and perfected full rights to that which you are granng under a Trust arrangement, and possess the records to prove such (before aempng to special deposit) Q: What right do I have to be granng property in Trust nunc-pro-tunc (‘now for then’ or 'back to the beginning') via a deed now? A: It is my property (my body and aachments to and proceeds therefrom). My mother did this on my behalf. (One can only grant that which they own or what they have the right to). Now that I have come of age I have the right to correct the record because of a mistake due to ignorance (mistaken construcon of my intent due to my ignorance of the right to and my duty to correct it). Q: What is the nexus between the public and private? A: The private trust is the benecial interest holder of the public trust. The public trust is claimed as proceeding from the private trust (a sub-trust) and will receive the disbursements from the private trust. Therefore, the trustee of the private trust is also trustee of the public trust (legal identy). Q: What right do you have to do anything private? A: Under a change in the nature and character of my relaon with government from a mistaken construance of  my intent for it to be a guardian and ward relaon, to an individually segregated private express trust which entles me to the specic performance of execuon of the trust dues in full.

Secon 5 - Document and Record Keeping Instrucons 5.1 All Documents

Ensure they contain all the elements necessary for the type of document intended. Keep all originals and send others copies or alternavely, make duplicate originals with unique serial ID numbers and send others a duplicate original. (Except Trust Res property instruments - Send others originals but always keep copies) (Only the holder of an instrument can verify its veracity) Ensure dates, signatures, witnesses and notarising are present for any document they are required for. (The endorser is the maker and the maker is the owner of the document) Keep your documents and copies in an ordered fashion in a safe and convenient c onvenient place for future retrieval and keep copies elsewhere as a backup if necessary, just in case c ase the originals are lost. When sending documents to other pares, always use a registered mail system if it will be required to prove that you sent it and get a return conrmaon record if it will be required to prove that the other party received it. 5.2 Condenal Documents

Include “Private and Condenal” at the top of the document and on the envelope. Withhold disclosure of condenal documents without a condenality arrangement or sealed record in court. 2 Private witnesses for documents which require witnesses. 5.3 Leers / Legal Communicaon  

Heading Informaon + Pro Forma  Always use registered registered post for proof of mailing and / or delivery as necessary.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Date:

(dd/mm/yy)

Ref:

(other party’s reference numbers)

From:

(Name, Title, Address)

 

Page 14 of 21 To:

(Name, Title, Address)

Cc:

(Name, Title, Address)

Re:

(Brief descripon of what the leer is about)

Title Body of Leer -

Order - (Introducon, History, Current Informaon, Arguments, Spulaons, Requests, Conclusion)

Signature -

(Only use trust tles or reservaons on trust documents documents – e.g. only use: by Grantor, Trustee or Beneciary to qualify your signature or use an ellipsis “…” if trust pares are

Contact Cont act Details:

unacceptable) (Ph, Email)

Aachments: - Copies of previous communicaon. - Records proving back story and current situaon. - Records proving facts claimed. - Copies of Communicaons with other pares. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Notes - Number each page as a serial (page 1 of 3, 2 of 3, etc….) - Number each paragraph and Keep each paragraph to one parcular point. - Keep it brief and to the point, include all necessary informaon, make clear c lear premise-argument-conclusion premise-argument-conclusion ordered statements. - Be clear about what the communicaon or document is about, what your posion is and what you want and aempt to negoate and arrange the next steps. - Follow the Honour / Dishonour principles. (1.Silence, 2.Argument / 3.Condional Acceptance, 4.Full Acceptance) - Endorse documents with a statement proving authencity and your signature. - Always be aware which party you are acng as when performing an acon or endorsing an instrument in relaon to a trust. (i.e. Grantor, Trustee or Beneciary) - Keep all originals except trust res instruments. 5.4 Principles for Procedure  - (Victoria Joy)

Honour/Dishonour. Develop Discernment. Denions before Explanaons. You don’t know what you don’t know. Last is First - First is Last - on documents. LIFO - Last In First Out – in court. 4 Possible Responses - (Silence, Argue / Condional Acceptance, Full Acceptance). (Dishonour/Honour) Condional Acceptance - how to - Controversy in Court. Negave Averment for Statements/Adavits - (3,4 not 2,1) Shis the burden of proof. ‘I am a man’ becomes ‘A man not am I’. Agreement of facts via Negave Averment and Timed Estoppel leaving No Controversy.

 

Page 15 of 21 That which is true, need not be said - Don’t bring it up if you don’t want to argue about it or have to prove it or have it work against you. He who claims must prove. (Except beneciaries for breach of trust once trust is proven) Evidence or leers issued by notary presentment are admissible and get straight past the hear-say rule. Double Mindedness - Acons Prove (must match) Your Intent, not what you say. Intent vs. manifestaon of intent. Noce to Principle is noce to Agent and vice-versa. Avoid Touché Taccs. Know Who You Are. Rebut any presumpons. Moon to strike their evidence or their claims by way of a rule or by superior equitable right. Always answer any thing they do or you waive your right to (i.e. object with grounds). What are they saying, what aren’t they saying. What are you saying, what needs not be said (truth). Facts in court are legal cons (tles). Facts in court are contextual. Balance of probabilies principle in Civil Jurisdicon. Beyond reasonable doubt principle in Criminal jurisdicon. Repeat your stance 3 mes when an aempt is made to get you o stance.

Secon 6 - Appendix 6.1 Disclaimer / Trust Example

Take NOTICE and ACKNOWLEDGEMENT with agreement that this communicaon and/or documents is PRIVATE, and not to be construed or relied upon as being legal advice for any individual legal situaon or employed for making legal decisions, and you will not use any of this informaon for making a legal decision or performing a legal procedure, and is not a substute for legal advice and/or guidance by a licensed aorney. This private communicaon and/or documents are for academic, informaonal purposes only to be used at your own risk, without liability to the author. By accessing or reviewing this communicaon, or using the documents therein, you understand with agreement that, with all rights reserved, without prejudice, the author is not an aorney licensed to pracce law in the State of South Australia, or any other State, and has not given legal advice, or accepted fees for legal advice, provided no assistance, advising, or guidance g uidance of any kind, for use by non-aorneys or pro se pares in the preparaon or use of the therein referenced, and has no interest in any issue referenced to it therein, and is not a party to this, or any acon arising from, and is only acng as an authorized capacity as liaisons to communicaons between the pares. By reading and/or using this informaon you acquire knowledge, and agree that you are not a client of the author. These documents and communicaons are incomplete and void without this NOTICE AGREEMENT being aached herein by reference, and a breach of this agreement. Upon breach of this agreement, the breaching party becomes liable for ADMIRALTY COMMERCIAL DAMAGES of $100 million dollars per stulcaon or impairment per the author’s discreon. Thank you for your under-standing. (The author’s intent is to keep this communicaon and informaon strictly private, condenal and non-commercial.)

 

Page 16 of 21

6.2 Diagrams and Explanaons

Root Trust Process Diagram:

 

Page 17 of 21

Dual Accounng Diagram:

 

Page 18 of 21

 

Page 19 of 21

Root Trust Expression Diagram + Dual Accounng Diagram Explanaon The dual accounng diagram shows how on the public side a set-o and a discharge only ever aect the debts. Under a private trust, we are able to claim all that was created ffrom rom the registraon and the signature and apply it to the debt as a merger of tle in trust which exnguishes it and is only enforceable in Equity as a benecial right in trust. (When the legal and equitable tle to a trust are vested in one party, the trust terminates, the debt is exnguished and the remainder is disbursed to the beneciary.) We can do this without terminang the trust, by assigning only the poron of the interest in the assets which is necessary to exnguish the debt. The root trust process diagram shows how once we correct and update the relaon, we have a trustee on the private side with the duty to perform the accounng a ccounng for us. What we are aempng is to gain the right to all the foreign sourced credit and exnguish the debts. The UCC's don't claim anything, they are a noce in the public of a private claim, which goes directly to the one the original gi/grant (birth registraon) was to. The Birth Cercate we receive is not really a tle it is a cercate of tle, the registraon applicaon doc is a survey which once registered creates a tle, the Birth Cercate we receive is an extract of a registered event which is a record of a birth event and is not a proper cercate of deposit. What I'm going to ask the trustee to account for is if a cercate of deposit was originally created and where it has gone now. That’s how to trace the interests which are derived from the registraon. It's not the records we hold which are important, it’s the records which they created that we have never seen which are important and will lead to all the security interests. This is what we want a tracing and accounng of as a benecial right in trust.

Australian Federal Government Structure Diagram:

 

Page 20 of 21 6.3 Document Types and Their Required Elements Establishment - (of the trust and the right to performance)

Title – A wrien memorandum of a claim to property at a certain point in me. - ID, Name, Descripon (meets and bounds), and Tenure – (Public or Private) UCC1 and UCC3 Noce Filings – A Public noce type UCC register ling. - Must contain the verbiage of the claiming and transferring statements. - Mark the box which indicates they are a noce. Public Noce – Judicially recognised noce to all interested pares to be relied upon for legal eect. - Must be on a legally recognised public noce register. - Evidence is a copy of the publicaon itself. Adavit – Asservaon of truth of a deponent to be used as evidence of the facts aested to therein. - Must be in the format f ormat for the court expected to be used. - Must be indorsed with a public ocial witness – i.e. JP or Notary. Noce of Interest – A private leer giving noce to the holder of property of an exisng interest in that property. - include all informaon intended to be relied on later in court for noce thereof. - Makes specic requests - Indorsed Condenality Arrangement – Agreement to condenality over certain private informaon. - Can be mutual or single party. - Protects both pares against breach of trust or the public disseminaon of private informaon. Deed – Record of the granng of tle to property or an interest therein. - Granng, habendum, jurisdicon clauses, signed sealed and delivered. Indenture – Agreed undertaking of a trustee to perform the trust dues. - Incorporated into deed by reference. Assignment Declaraon – An undertaking by an individual to part with property or an interest in property. - Describe property and type of interest. Bond – A wrien undertaking to do a thing based on a condion precedent. Applicaon – A request for an authority to do something. -

 

Page 21 of 21 Enforcement - (of the trust and the right to performance)

Bill in Equity for: - De Decla clara rato tory ry Judg Judgem emen entt

(If tr trus uste tee e indi indica cate tess the theyy lack lack the the ex exec ecuv uve e po powe werr to to p per erfor form) m)

- Breach of Trust

(If trustee fails to perform or disclaims trust)

Court rules, Forms: - Originang Acon

(Correct form and Procedure)

- Interlocutory Applicaon

(Heard immediately to avoid waste, special exigent circumstances)

- Seal Record

(To protect Private Condenal Informaon)

- Entering Evidence

(Correct form and procedure)

6.4 Glossary of Terms

View more...

Comments

Copyright ©2017 KUPDF Inc.
SUPPORT KUPDF