PROJECT ON HDFC MUTUAL FUND
Short Description
Summer training report...
Description
“RISK RETURN ANALYSIS AND COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MUTUAL FUNDS” FOR HDFC Asset Management Company Ltd.
A Report on Project work In MASTER OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION (MBA) By Somesh Behere
GUIDED BY:
SUBMITTED
BY: PROF.GARGI NAIDU
SOMESH BEHERE
HOD ACADEMICS
MBA IV Semester
VIM BHOPAL
BHOPAL
VIDYASAGAR INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT BARKATULLAH UNIVERSITY BHOPAL(M.P.) SESSION (2008-2010)
BONOFIDE CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that the Report on Project Work titled “RISK RETURN ANALYSIS AND COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MUTUAL FUNDS” for HDFC Asset Management Company Ltd. is a bonafide record of the work done by
Somesh Behere
studying in Master of Business Administration in Vidhyasagar Institute of Management ,Bhopal during the year 2008-10.
Project Viva-Voce held on.....................
Internal examiner
External examiner
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The performance evaluation of mutual fund is a vital matter of concern to the fund managers, investors, and researchers alike. The core competence of the company is to meet objectives and the needs of the investors and to provide optimum return for their risk. This study tries to find out the risk and return allied with the mutual funds. This project paper is segmented into three sections to explore the link between conventional subjective and statistical approach of Mutual Fund analysis. To start with, the first section deals with the introductory part of the paper by giving an overview of the Mutual fund industry and company profile. This section also talks about the theory of portfolio analysis and the different measures of risk and return used for the comparison. The second section details on the need, objective, and the limitations of the study. It also discusses about the sources and the period for the data collection. It also deals with the data interpretation and analysis part wherein all the key measures related to risk and return are done with the interpretation of the results. In the third section, an attempt is made to analyse and compare the performance of the equity mutual fund. For this purpose β-value, standard deviation, and risk adjusted performance measures such as Sharpe ratio, Treynor measure, Jenson Alpha, and Fema measure have been used. The portfolio analysis of the selected fund has been done by the measure return for the holding period. At the end, it illustrates the suggestions and findings based on the analysis done in the previous sections and finally it deals with conclusion part.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I take this opportunity to express my deep sense of gratitude to all those who have contributed significantly by sharing their knowledge and experience in the completion of this project work. I am greatly obliged to, for providing me with the right kind of opportunity and facilities to complete this venture. My first word of gratitude is due to Mr.Sidhartha Chattergee – Branch Manager, HDFC AMC,Allhabad, my corporate guide, for his kind help and support and his valuable guidance throughout my project. I am thankful to him for providing me with necessary insights and helping me out at every single step. I am also thankful to Prof Ashok Diwedi Executive Trainee, the former student of VIDHYASAGAR INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT, Bhopal for her constant valuable assistance and consultancy. I also thank Mr.Ankit Kumr, Unit Manager for his kind words of encouragement. Above all, I express my words of gratitude to HDFC AMC, Allahabad Branch for proving me with all the knowledge resources and enabling me to pass AMFI-MTUTUAL FUND (ADVISOR) MODULE; NSE’s CERTIFICATION IN FINANCIAL MARKETS (NCFM) with 74.5 percentages. I am extremely thankful to Miss. Gargi Naidu – my internal faculty guide under whose able guidance this project work was carried out. I thank her for her continuous support and mentoring during the tenure of the project. Finally, I would also like to thank all my dear friends for their cooperation, advice and encouragement during the long and arduous task of carrying out the project and preparing this report.
PREFACE
This is the age of technical up gradation. Nothing remains same for a long period every thing change with a certain span of time. So it is must for every organization to put a birds eye view on it’s over all functioning. This report was preparing during practical training of Master of business administration (M.B.A.) from Vidyasagar institute of management Bhopal (M.P.) .The student of M.B.A.essentially required a practical training of 4to6 weeks in any organization. It gives an opportunity to the student to test their acquired knowledge through practical experiences. The objective of my study was Risk Return Analysis And Comparative Study Of Mutual Funds “HDFC Asset Management Company Ltd.” I however present this report In all my modesty to the readers with a faith that it shall serve the causes of subject. .
PLACE-……….. DATE…………..
SOMESH BEHERE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.
Part-I
1-37
Executive Summary
Iii
A. Mutual Fund Overview
1-19
1.1 Mutual Fund an Investment Platform
1-2
1.2 Advantages of Mutual Fund
3
1.3 Disadvantage of Investing Through Mutual Funds
4
1.4 Categories of Mutual Fund
4-8
1.5 Investment Strategies
8
1.6 Organisation of Mutual Fund
9-11
1.7 Distribution Channels
12
1.8 HDFC AMC Company Overview
12-19
B. Measuring and Evaluating Mutual Funds Performance
20-37
1.2.1
Purpose of Measuring and Evaluating
20-21
1.2.2
Financial Planning for Investors referring to Mutual Funds
22
1.2.3
Why Has It Become One Of The Largest Financial Instruments?
22-25
1.2.4 Evaluating Portfolio Performance
26
1.2.5 How to Reduce Risk While Investing
26-28
1.2.6
A Study of Portfolio Analysis from The Point Of Fund Manager
28-29
1.2.7
Measures of Risk and Return
29-37
Part-II
38-40
Research Methodology 2.1 Need For the Study
38-39
2.2 Objective of the Study
39
2.3 Limitations of the Study
40
2.4 Data Collection
40
Part-III
41-102
Case Analysis 3.1 Data Interpretation
41-87
3.2 Analysis of the observation
87-97
3.3 Findings
98
3.4 Recommendations
99-100
3.5 Conclusion
101
References
102
PART-I
MUTUAL FUND OVERVIEW MUTUAL FUND AN INVESTMENT PLATFORM Mutual fund is an investment company that pools money from small investors and invests in a variety of securities, such as stocks, bonds and money market instruments. Most open-end Mutual funds stand ready to buy back (redeem) its shares at their current net asset value, which depends on the total market value of the fund's investment portfolio at the time
of redemption.
Most open-end Mutual funds continuously offer new shares to
investors. It is also known as an open-end investment company, to differentiate it from a closed-end investment company. Mutual funds invest pooled cash of many investors to meet the fund's stated investment objective. Mutual funds stand ready to sell and redeem their shares at any time at the fund’s
PROFIT/LOSS FORM PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENT
INVEST IN VARIETY OF STOCKS/BONDS
PROFIT/LOSS FROM INDIVIDUAL
MARKET (FLUCTUATIONS)
INVESTOR
INVEST THEIR MONEY
MUTUAL FUND SHEMES
current net asset value: total fund assets divided by shares outstanding.
Figure: 1.1
In Simple Words, Mutual fund is a mechanism for pooling the resources by issuing units to the investors and investing funds in securities in accordance with objectives as disclosed in offer document. Investments in securities are spread across a wide cross-section of industries and sectors and thus the risk is reduced. Diversification reduces the risk because not all stocks may move in the same direction in the same proportion at the same time. Mutual fund issues units t o the investors in accordance with quantum of money invested by them. Investors of Mutual fund are known as unit holders. The profits or losses are shared by the investors in proportion to their investments. The Mutual funds normally come out with a number of schemes with different investment objectives which are launched from time to time.
In India, A Mutual fund is required to be registered with Securities and Exchange Boa rd of India (SEBI) which regulates securities markets before it can collect funds from the public.
In Short , a Mutual fund is a common pool of money in to which investors with common investment objective place their contributions that are to be invested in accordance with the state d investment objective of the scheme. The investment manager would invest the money collected from the investor in to assets that are defined/ permitted by the stated objective
of the scheme. For example, a n equity fund would invest
equity and equity related instruments and a debt fund would invest in bonds, debentures, gilts etc. Mutual fund is a suitable investment for the common ma n a s it offers an Oporto unity to invest in a diversified, professionally managed basket of securities at a relatively low cost.
1.2 ADVANTAGES OF MUTUAL FUND Table:1.1 S. No.
Advant age
Particulars
1.
Portfoli o Diversif ication
Mutual Funds invest in a well-diversified portfolio of securities which enables investor to hold a diversified investment portfolio (whether the amount of investment is big or small).
2.
Professi onal Manage ment
Fund manager undergoes through various research works and has better investment management skills which ensure higher returns to the investor than what he can manage on his own.
3.
Less Risk
Investors acquire a diversified portfolio of securities even with a small investment in a Mutual Fund. The risk in a diversified portfolio is lesser than investing in merely 2 or 3 securities.
4.
Low Transac tion Costs
Due to the economies of scale (benefits of larger volumes), mutual funds pay lesser transaction costs. These benefits are passed on to the investors.
5.
Liquidit y
An investor may not be able to sell some of the shares held by him very easily and quickly, whereas units of a mutual fund are far more liquid.
6.
Choice of Scheme s
Mutual funds provide investors with various schemes with different investment objectives. Investors have the option of investing in a scheme having a correlation between its investment objectives and their own financial goals. These schemes further have different plans/options
7.
Transp arency
Funds provide investors with updated information pertaining to the markets and the schemes. All material facts are disclosed to investors as required by the regulator.
Flexibili ty
Investors also benefit from the convenience and flexibility offered by Mutual Funds. Investors can switch their holdings from a debt scheme to an equity scheme and vice-versa. Option of systematic (at regular intervals) investment and withdrawal is also offered to the investors in most open-end schemes.
Safety
Mutual Fund industry is part of a well-regulated investment environment where the interests of the investors are protected by the regulator. All funds are registered with SEBI and complete transparency is forced.
8.
9.
1.3 DISADVANTAGE OF INVESTING THROUGH MUTUAL FUNDS Table:1.2 S. No.
Disadva ntage
Particulars
1.
Costs Control Not in the Hands of an Investor
Investor has to pay investment management fees and fund distribution costs as a percentage of the value of his investments (as long as he holds the units), irrespective of the performance of the fund.
2.
No Custom ized Portfoli os
The portfolio of securities in which a fund invests is a decision taken by the fund manager. Investors have no right to interfere in the decision making process of a fund manager, which some investors find as a constraint in achieving their financial objectives.
3.
Difficult y in Selectin g a Suitable Fund Scheme
Many investors find it difficult to select one option from the plethora of funds/schemes/plans available. For this, they may have to take advice from financial planners in order to invest in the right fund to achieve their objectives.
1.4 CATEGORIES OF MUTUAL FUND
BASED ON THEIR STURCTURE
OPEN ENDED FUNDS
CLOSE-ENDED FUNDS
Figure:1.2
2. BASED ON INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE
EQUITY FUNDS
BALANCED FUNDS
DEBT FUNDS
INDEX FUNDS DEVIDEND YEILD EQUITY DIVERSIFIED
LEQUID FUNDS DEBT ORIENTED
GUILT FUNDS
EQUITY ORIENTED
INCOME FUNDS
THEMANTIC FUND
FMPS FUNDS
SECTOR FUND
FLOATING RATE
ELSS
ARBITAGE FUNDS
Mutual funds can be classified as follow: Based on their structure: Open-ended funds: Investors can buy and sell the units from the fund, at any point of
time. Close-ended funds: These funds raise money from investors only once. Therefore,
after the offer period, fresh investments cannot be made into the fund. If the fund is listed on a stocks exchange, the units can be traded like stocks (E.g., Morgan Stanley Growth Fund). Recently, most of the New Fund Offers of close-ended funds provided liquidity window on a periodic basis such as monthly or weekly. Redemption of units can be made during specified intervals. Therefore, such funds have relatively low liquidity. Based on their investment objective:
Equity funds: These funds invest in equities and equity related instruments. With
fluctuating share prices, such funds show volatile performance, even losses. However, short term fluctuations in the market, generally smoothens out in the long term, thereby offering higher returns at relatively lower volatility. At the same time, such funds can yield great capital appreciation as, historically, equities have outperformed
all asset classes in the long term. Hence, investment in equity funds should be considered for a period of at least 3-5 years. It can be further classified as: 1. Index funds- In this case a key stock market index, like BSE Sensex or Nifty is tracked. Their
portfolio mirrors the benchmark index in terms of both composition and individual
stock weightages. 2. Equity diversified funds- 100% of the capital is invested in equities spreading across different sectors and stocks. 3. Dividend yield funds- it is similar to the equity-diversified funds except that they invest in companies offering high dividend yields. 4. Thematic funds- Invest 100% of the assets in sectors which are related through some theme. e.g. -An infrastructure fund invests in power, construction, cements sectors etc. 5. Sector funds- Invest 100% of the capital in a specific sector. e.g. - A banking sector fund will invest in banking stocks. 6. ELSS- Equity Linked Saving Scheme provides tax benefit to the investors. Balanced fund: Their investment portfolio includes both debt and equity. As a result, on the risk-return ladder, they fall between equity and debt funds. Balanced funds are the ideal mutual funds vehicle for investors who prefer spreading their risk across various instruments. Following are balanced funds classes: 2
Debt-oriented funds -Investment below 65% in equities.
3
Equity-oriented funds -Invest at least 65% in equities, remaining in debt.
Debt fund: They invest only in debt instruments, and are a good option for investors
averse to idea of taking risk associated with equities. Therefore, they invest exclusively in fixed-income instruments like bonds, debentures, Government of India securities; and money market instruments such as certificates of deposit (CD), commercial paper (CP) and call money. Put your money into any of these debt funds depending on your investment horizon and needs.
1.
Liquid funds- These funds invest 100% in money market instruments, a large portion being invested in call money market.
2. Gilt funds ST- They invest 100% of their portfolio in government securities of and
T-bills. 3.
Floating rate funds - Invest in short-term debt papers. Floaters invest in debt instruments, which have variable coupon rate.
4. Arbitrage fund- They generate income through arbitrage opportunities due to miss-
pricing between cash market and derivatives market. Funds are allocated to equities, derivatives and money markets. Higher proportion (around 75%) is put in money markets, in the absence of arbitrage opportunities. 5. Gilt funds LT- They invest 100% of their portfolio in long-term government
securities. 6. Income funds LT- Typically, such funds invest a major portion of the portfolio in
long-term debt papers. 7. MIPs- Monthly Income Plans have an exposure of 70%-90% to debt and an exposure
of 10%-30% to equities. 8. FMPs- fixed monthly plans invest in debt papers whose maturity is in line with that
of the fund.
How are funds different in terms of their risk profile: Table:1.3
Equity Funds
High level of return, but has a high level of risk too
Debt funds
Returns comparatively less risky than equity funds
Liquid
and
Market funds
Money Provide stable but low level of return
INVESTMENT STRATEGIES 1. Systematic Investment Plan: Under this, a fixed sum is invested each month on a fixed date of a month. Payment is made through post-dated cheques or direct debit facilities. The investor gets fewer units when the NAV is high and more units when the NAV is low. This is called as the benefit of Rupee Cost Averaging (RCA) 2. Systematic Transfer Plan: Under this, an investor invest in debt-oriented fund and give instructions to transfer a fixed sum, at a fixed interval, to an equity scheme of the same mutual fund. 3. Systematic Withdrawal Plan: if someone wishes to withdraw from a mutual fund then he can withdraw a fixed amount each month.
1.6. ORGANISATION OF MUTUAL FUND:
Figure:1.4
THE STRUCTURE CONSISTS OF:
SPONSOR Sponsor is the person who acting alone or in combination with another body corporate establishes a mutual fund. Sponsor must contribute at least 40% of the net worth of the Investment managed and meet the eligibility criteria prescribed under the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Mutual Fund) Regulations, 1996. The sponsor is not responsible or liable for any loss or shortfall resulting from the operation of the Schemes beyond the initial contribution made by it towards setting up of the Mutual Fund. TRUST The Mutual Fund is constituted as a trust in accordance with the provisions of the Indian Trusts Act, 1882 by the Sponsor. The trust deed is registered under the Indian Registration Act, 1908.
TRUSTEE Trustee is usually a company (corporate body) or a Board of Trustees (body of individuals). The main responsibility of the Trustee is to safeguard the interest of the unit holders and ensure that the AMC functions in the interest of investors and in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996, the provisions of the Trust Deed and the Offer Documents of the respective Schemes. At least 2/3rd directors of the Trustee are independent directors who are not associated with the Sponsor in any manner. ASSET MANAGEMENT COMPANY (AMC) The AMC is appointed by the Trustee as the Investment Manager of the Mutual Fund. The AMC is required to be approved by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) to act as an asset management company of the Mutual Fund. At least 50% of the directors of the AMC are independent directors who are not associated with the Sponsor in any manner. The AMC must have a net worth of at least 10 cores at all times. REGISTRAR AND TRANSFER AGENT
The AMC if so authorized by the Trust Deed appoints the Registrar and Transfer Agent to the Mutual Fund. The Registrar processes the application form, redemption requests and dispatches account statements to the unit holders. The Registrar and Transfer agent also handles communications with investors and updates investor records.
ASSET UNDER MANAGEMENT: Table1.4 ASSET UNDER MANAGEMENT OF TOP AMC,S as on Jun 30, 2009 Mutual Fund Name
No.
of
Corpus (Rs.Crores)
schemes Reliance Mutual Fund
263
108,332.36
HDFC Mutual Fund
202
78,197.90
ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund
325
70,169.46
UTI Mutual Fund
207
67,978.19
Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund
283
56,282.87
SBI Mutual Fund
130
34,061.04
LIC Mutual Fund
70
32,414.92
Kotak Mahindra Mutual Fund
124
30,833.02
Franklin Templeton Mutual Fund
191
25,472.85
IDFC Mutual Fund
164
21,676.29
Tata Mutual Fund
175
21,222.81
The graph indicates the growth of assets over the years.
Figure:1.5
1.7 DISTRIBUTION CHANNELS:
Mutual funds posses a very strong distribution channel so that the ultimate customers doesn’t face any difficulty in the final procurement. The various parties involved in distribution of mutual funds are:
1. Direct marketing by the AMCs: the forms could be obtained from the AMCs directly. The investors can approach to the AMCs for the forms. some of the top AMCs of India are; Reliance ,Birla Sunlife, Tata, SBI magnum, Kotak Mahindra, HDFC, Sundaram, ICICI, Mirae Assets, Canara Robeco, Lotus India, LIC, UTI etc. whereas foreign AMCs include: Standard Chartered, Franklin Templeton, Fidelity, JP Morgan, HSBC, DSP Merill Lynch, etc.
2. Broker/ sub broker arrangements: the AMCs can simultaneously go for broker/subbroker to popularize their funds. AMCs can enjoy the advantage of large network of these brokers and sub brokers. 3. Individual agents, Banks, NBFC: investors can procure the funds through individual agents, independent brokers, banks and several non- banking financial corporations too, whichever he finds convenient for him.
1.8 HDFC AMC COMPANY OVERVIEW HDFC ASSET MANAGEMENT COMPANY LIMITED (AMC) AMC was incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, on December 10, 1999, and was approved to act as an AMC for the Mutual Fund by SEBI on July 30, 2000.
The registered office of the AMC is situated at Ramon House, 3rd Floor, H.T. Parekh Marg, 169, Back bay Reclamation, Church gate, Mumbai - 400 020. In terms of the Investment Management Agreement, the Trustee has appointed HDFC Asset Management Company Limited to manage the Mutual Fund
As per the terms of the Investment Management Agreement, the AMC will conduct the operations of the Mutual Fund and manage assets of the schemes, including the schemes launched from time to time.
The present share holding pattern of the AMC is as follows: Table:1.5
Particulars
% of the paid up capital
Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited 50.10 Standard Life Investments Limited
49.90
Zurich Insurance Company (ZIC), the Sponsor of Zurich India Mutual Fund, following a review of its overall strategy, had decided to divest its Asset Management business in India. The AMC had entered into an agreement with ZIC to acquire the said business, subject to necessary regulatory approvals.
On obtaining the regulatory approvals, the Schemes of Zurich India Mutual Fund has now migrated to HDFC Mutual Fund on June 19, 2003.
The AMC is also providing portfolio management / advisory services and such activities are not in conflict with the activities of the Mutual Fund. The AMC has renewed its registration from SEBI vide Registration No. - PM / INP000000506 dated December 22, 2000 to act as a Portfolio Manager under the SEBI (Portfolio Managers) Regulations, 1993. The Certificate of Registration is valid from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2006.
Board of Directors The Board of Directors of the HDFC Asset Management Company Limited (AMC) consists of the following eminent persons. Table:1.6
Mr. Deepak S. Parekh Mr. N. Keith Skeoch Mr. Keki M. Mistry Mr. James Aird Mr. P. M. Thampi Mr. Humayun Dhanrajgir Dr. Deepak B. Phatak Mr. Hoshang S. Billimoria Mr. Rajeshwar Raj Bajaaj Mr. Vijay Merchant Ms. Renu S. Karnad
Chairman of the board CEO of Standard Life Investments Ltd. Associate director Investment director Independent director Independent director Independent director Independent director Independent director Independent director Joint managing director
Mr. Milind Barve
Managing director
Mr. Deepak Parekh, the Chairman of the Board, is associated with HDFC Ltd. in his capacity as its Executive Chairman. Mr. Parekh joined HDFC Ltd. in a senior management position in 1978. He was inducted as Wholetime Director of HDFC Ltd. in 1985 and was appointed as the Executive Chairman in 1993.
Mr. N. Keith Skeoch is associated with Standard Life Investments Limited as its Chief Executive and is responsible for all company business and investment operations within Standard Life Investments Limited.
Mr. Keki M. Mistry is an associate director on the Board. He is the Vice-Chairman & Managing Director of Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited (HDFC Ltd.) He is with HDFC Ltd. since 1981 and was appointed as the Executive Director of HDFC Ltd. in 1993. He was appointed as the Deputy Managing Director in 1999, Managing Director in 2000 and Vice Chairman & Managing Director in 2007. SPONSORS HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION LIMITED (HDFC): HDFC was incorporated in 1977 as the first specialised housing finance institution in India. HDFC provides financial assistance to individuals, corporate and developers for the purchase or construction of residential housing. It also provides property related services (e.g. property identification, sales services and valuation), training and consultancy. Of these activities, housing finance remains the dominant activity. HDFC currently has a client base of over 8, 00,000 borrowers, 12, 00,000 depositors, 92,000 shareholders and 50,000 deposit agents. HDFC raises funds from international agencies such as the World Bank, IFC (Washington), USAID, CDC, ADB and KFW, domestic term loans from banks and insurance companies, bonds and deposits. HDFC has received the highest rating for its bonds and deposits program for the ninth year in succession. HDFC Standard Life Insurance Company Limited, promoted by HDFC was the first life insurance company in
the private sector to be granted a Certificate of Registration (on October 23, 2000) by the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority to transact life insurance business in India. HDFC is India's premier housing finance company and enjoys an impeccable track record in India as well as in international markets. Since its inception in 1977, the Corporation has maintained a consistent and healthy growth in its operations to remain the market leader in mortgages. Its outstanding loan portfolio covers well over a million dwelling units. HDFC has developed significant expertise in retail mortgage loans to different market segments and also has a large corporate client base for its housing related credit facilities. With its experience in the financial markets, a strong market reputation, large shareholder base and unique consumer franchise, HDFC was ideally positioned to promote a bank in the Indian environment. STANDARD LIFE INVESTMENTS LIMITED The Standard Life Assurance Company was established in 1825 and has considerable experience in global financial markets. In 1998, Standard Life Investments Limited became the dedicated investment management company of the Standard Life Group and is owned 100% by The Standard Life Assurance Company. With global assets under management of approximately US$186.45 billion as at March 31, 2005, Standard Life Investments Limited is one of the world's major investment companies and is responsible for investing money on behalf of five million retail and institutional clients worldwide. With its headquarters in Edinburgh, Standard Life Investments Limited has an extensive and developing global presence with operations in the United Kingdom, Ireland, Canada, USA, China, Korea and Hong Kong. In order to meet the different needs and risk profiles of its clients, Standard Life Investments Limited manages a diverse portfolio covering all of the major markets world-wide, which includes a range of private and public equities, government and company bonds, property investments and various derivative instruments. The company's current holdings in UK equities account for approximately 2% of the market capitalization of the London Stock Exchange.
HDFC MUTUAL FUND PRODUCTS
Equity Funds HDFC Growth Fund HDFC Long Term Advantage Fund HDFC Index Fund HDFC Equity Fund HDFC Capital Builder Fund HDFC Tax saver HDFC Top 200 Fund HDFC Core & Satellite Fund HDFC Premier Multi-Cap Fund HDFC Long Term Equity Fund HDFC Mid-Cap Opportunity Fund Balanced Funds HDFC Children's Gift Fund Investment Plan HDFC Children's Gift Fund Savings Plan HDFC Balanced Fund HDFC Prudence Fund Debt Funds HDFC Income Fund HDFC Liquid Fund HDFC Gilt Fund Short Term Plan HDFC Gilt Fund Long Term Plan HDFC Short Term Plan HDFC Floating Rate Income Fund Short Term Plan HDFC Floating Rate Income Fund Long Term Plan HDFC Liquid Fund - PREMIUM PLAN HDFC Liquid Fund - PREMIUM PLUS PLAN
HDFC Short Term Plan - PREMIUM PLAN HDFC Short Term Plan - PREMIUM PLUS PLAN HDFC Income Fund Premium Plan HDFC Income Fund Premium plus Plan HDFC High Interest Fund HDFC High Interest Fund - Short Term Plan HDFC Sovereign Gilt Fund - Savings Plan HDFC Sovereign Gilt Fund - Investment Plan HDFC Sovereign Gilt Fund - Provident Plan HDFC Cash Management Fund - Savings Plan HDFC Cash Management Fund - Call Plan HDFCMF Monthly Income Plan - Short Term Plan HDFCMF Monthly Income Plan - Long Term Plan HDFC Cash Management Fund - Savings Plus Plan HDFC Multiple Yield Fund HDFC Multiple Yield Fund Plan 2005
ACHIEVEMENT AND AWARDS CNBC - TV 18 - CRISIL Mutual Fund of the Year Awards 2008 : HDFC Prudence Fund was the only scheme that won the CNBC - TV 18 - CRISIL Mutual Fund of the Year Award 2008 in the Most Consistent Balanced Fund under CRISIL ~ CPR for the calendar year 2007 (from amongst 3 schemes). HDFC Cash Management Fund - Savings Plan was the only scheme that won the CNBC TV 18 - CRISIL Mutual Fund of the Year Award 2008 in the Most Consistent Liquid Fund under CRISIL ~ CPR for the calendar year 2007 (from amongst 5 schemes). HDFC Cash Management Fund - Savings Plan was the only scheme that won the CNBC -
TV 18 - CRISIL Mutual Fund of the Year Award 2008 in the Liquid Scheme – Retail Category for the calendar year 2007 (from amongst 19 schemes).
Lipper Fund Awards 2008: HDFC Equity Fund - Growth has been awarded the 'Best Fund over Ten Years' in the 'Equity India Category' at the Lipper Fund Awards 2008 (form amongst 23 schemes). It was awarded the Best Fund over ten years in 2006 and 2007 as well. 2008 makes it three in a row. Lipper Fund Awards 2009 : HDFC Equity Fund - Growth has been awarded the 'Best Fund over Ten Years' in the 'Equity India Category' (form amongst 34 schemes) and HDFC Prudence Fund – Growth Plan in the ‘Mixed Asset INR Aggressive Category’ (from amongst 6 schemes), have been awarded the ‘Best Fund over 10 Years’ by Lipper Fund Awards India 2009. ICRA Mutual Fund Awards – 2008 : HDFC MF Monthly Income Plan - Long Term Plan - Ranked a Seven Star Fund and has been awarded the Gold Award for "Best Performance" in the category of "Open Ended Marginal Equity" for the three year period ending December 31, 2007 (from amongst 27 schemes) HDFC High Interest Fund - Short Term Plan - Ranked a Five Star Fund indicating performance among the top 10% in the category of "Open Ended Debt - Short Term" for one year period ending December 31, 2007 (from amongst 20 schemes). HDFC Prudence Fund - Ranked a Five Star Fund indicating performance among the top 10% in the category of "Open Ended Balanced" for the three year period ending December 31, 2007 (from amongst 16 schemes)
B. MEASURING AND EVALUATING MUTUAL FUNDS PERFORMANCE:
1.2.1 PURPOSE OF MEASURING AND EVALUATING Every investor investing in the mutual funds is driven by the motto of either wealth creation or wealth increment or both. Therefore it’s very necessary to continuously evaluate the funds’ performance with the help of factsheets and newsletters, websites, newspapers and professional advisors like HDFC AMC. If the investors ignore the evaluation of funds’ performance then he can lose hold of it any time. In this ever-changing industry, he can face any of the following problems:
1. Variation in the funds’ performance due to change in its management/ objective. 2. The funds’ performance can slip in comparison to similar funds.
3. There may be an increase in the various costs associated with the fund. 4 .Beta, a technical measure of the risk associated may also surge. 5. The funds’ ratings may go down in the various lists published by independent rating agencies. 6. It can merge into another fund or could be acquired by another fund house.
Performance measures:
Equity funds: the performance of equity funds can be measured on the basis of: NAV Growth, Total Return; Total Return with Reinvestment at NAV, Annualized Returns and Distributions, Computing Total Return (Per Share Income and Expenses, Per Share Capital Changes, Ratios, Shares Outstanding), the Expense Ratio, Portfolio Turnover Rate, Fund Size, Transaction Costs, Cash Flow, Leverage.
Debt fund: Likewise, the performance of debt funds can be measured on the basis of: Peer Group Comparisons, The Income Ratio, Industry Exposures and Concentrations, NPAs, besides NAV Growth, Total Return and Expense Ratio.
Liquid funds: the performance of the highly volatile liquid funds can be measured on the basis of: Fund Yield, besides NAV Growth, Total Return and Expense Ratio. Concept of benchmarking for performance evaluation: Every fund sets its benchmark according to its investment objective. The funds performance is measured in comparison with the benchmark. If the fund generates a greater return than the benchmark then it is said that the fund has outperformed benchmark , if it is equal to benchmark then the correlation between them is exactly 1. And if in case the return is lower than the benchmark then the fund is said to be underperformed.
Some of the benchmarks are: 1. Equity funds: market indices such as S&P CNX nifty, BSE100, BSE200, BSE-PSU, BSE 500 index, BSE bankex, and other sectoral indices. 2. Debt funds: Interest Rates on Alternative Investments as Benchmarks, I-Bex Total Return Index, JPM T-Bill Index Post-Tax Returns on Bank Deposits versus Debt Funds. 3. Liquid funds: Short Term Government Instruments’ Interest Rates as Benchmarks, JPM T-
Bill Index.
To measure the fund’s performance, the comparisons are usually done with: I) with a market index. ii) Funds from the same peer group. iii) Other similar products in which investors invest their funds.
1.2.2 FINANCIAL PLANNING FOR INVESTORS REFERRING TO MUTUAL FUNDS:
Investors are required to go for financial planning before making investments in any mutual fund. The objective of financial planning is to ensure that the right amount of money is available at the right time to the investor to be able to meet his financial goals. It is more than mere tax planning. Steps in financial planning are:
Asset allocation. Selection of fund. Studying the features of a scheme.
In case of mutual funds, financial planning is concerned only with broad asset allocation, leaving the actual allocation of securities and their management to fund managers. A fund
manager has to closely follow the objectives stated in the offer document, because financial plans of users are chosen using these objectives.
1.2.3 WHY HAS IT BECOME ONE OF THE LARGEST FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS?
If we take a look at the recent scenario in the Indian financial market then we can find the market flooded with a variety of investment options which includes mutual funds, equities, fixed income bonds, corporate debentures, company fixed deposits, bank deposits, PPF, life insurance, gold, real estate etc. all these investment options could be judged on the basis of various parameters such as- return, safety convenience, volatility and liquidity. Measuring these
investment options on the basis of the mentioned parameters, we get this in a tabular
form
Table:1.7
Return
Safety
Volatility
Liquidity
Convenienc e
Equity
High
Low
High
High
Moderate
Bonds
Moderate
High
Moderate
Moderate
High
Co. Debent ures
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Low
Low
Co. FDs
Moderate
Low
Low
Low
Moderate
Bank Deposi ts
Low
High
Low
High
High
PPF
Moderate
High
Low
Moderate
High
Life Insura nce
Low
High
Low
Low
Moderate
Gold
Moderate
High
Moderate
Moderate
Gold
Real Estate
High
Moderate
High
Low
Low
Mutual Funds
High
High
Moderate
High
High
We can very well see that mutual funds outperform every other investment option. On three parameters, it scores high whereas it’s moderate at one. comparing it with the other options, we find that equities gives us high returns with high liquidity but its volatility too is high with low safety which doesn’t makes it favourite among persons who have low risk- appetite. Even the convenience involved with investing in equities is just moderate. Now looking at bank deposits, it scores better than equities at all fronts but lags badly in the parameter of utmost important ie; it scores low on return , so it’s not an happening option for person who can afford to take risks for higher return. The other option offering high return is real estate but that even comes with high volatility and moderate safety level, even the liquidity and convenience involved are too low. Gold have always been a favourite among Indians but when we look at it as an investment option then it definitely doesn’t gives a very bright picture. Although it ensures high safety but the returns generated and liquidity are moderate. Similarly, the other investment options are not at par with mutual funds and serve the needs of only a specific customer group. Straightforward, we can say that mutual fund emerges as a clear winner among all the options available.
The reasons for this being:
I)Mutual funds combine the advantage of each of the investment products: mutual fund is one such option which can invest in all other investment options. Its principle of diversification allows the investors to taste all the fruits in one plate. just by investing in it, the investor can enjoy the best investment option as per the investment objective. II) Dispense the shortcomings of the other options: every other investment option has more or less some shortcomings. Such as if some are good at return then they are not safe, if some are safe then either they have low liquidity or low safety or both….likewise, there exists no single option which can fit to the need of everybody. But mutual funds have definitely sorted out this problem. Now everybody can choose their fund according to their investment objectives.
III) Returns get adjusted for the market movements: as the mutual funds are managed by experts so they are ready to switch to the profitable option along with the market movement. Suppose they predict that market is going to fall then they can sell some of their shares and book profit and can reinvest the amount again in money market instruments. IV) Flexibility of invested amount: Other then the above mentioned reasons, there exists one more reason which has established mutual funds as one of the largest financial intermediary and that is the flexibility that mutual funds offer regarding the investment amount. One can start investing in mutual funds with amount as low as Rs. 500 through SIPs and even Rs. 100 in some cases.
Not all award-winning funds may be suitable for everyone Many investors feel that a simple way to invest in Mutual funds is to just keep investing in award winning funds. First of all, it is important to understand that more than the awards; it is the methodology to choose winners t at is more relevant. A rating firm generally elaborates on the criteria for deciding the winner’s i.e. consistent performance, risk adjusted returns, total returns and protection of capital. Each
of these factors is very important and ha s its significance for different categories of funds. Besides, each of these
factors has varying degree of significance for different kinds of
investors. For example, consistent return re ally focuses on risk. If someone is afraid of negative returns, consistency will be a more import ant measure than tot al ret urn i.e. Growth in NAV as well as dividend received. A fund can have very impressive total ret urns overtime, but can be very volatile and tough for a
risk adverse
investor. Therefore, all the ward winning funds in different
categories may not be suitable for everyone. Typically, when one has to select funds, the first step should be to consider personal goals and objectives. Invest ors need to decide which element they value the most and the n prioritize the other criteria Once one knows what one is looking for, one should go about selecting the funds according to the asset allocation. Most investors need just a few funds, carefully picked, watched and managed over period of time.
1.2.4 EVALUATING PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE It is important to evaluate the performance of the portfolio on an on-going basis. The following factors are important in this process: Consider long-term record of accomplishment rather than short -term performance. It is important because long-term track record moderates the effects which unusually good or bad short -term performance can have on a fund's track record. Besides, longer-term track record compensates for the effects of a fund manager's particular investment style. Evaluate the record of accomplishment against similar funds. Success in managing a small or in a fund focusing on a particular segment of the market cannot be re lied upon as an evidence of anticipated performance in managing a large or a broad based fund. Discipline in investment approach is an important factor as the pressure to perform can make a fund manager susceptible to have a n urge to change tracks in terms of stock selection as well a s investment strategy.
The objective should be to differentiate investment skill of the fund manager from luck and to identify those funds with the greatest potential of future success.
1.2.5 HOW TO REDUCE RISK WHILE INVESTING:
Any kind of investment we make
is subject to risk. In fact we get return on our
investment purely and solely because at the very beginning we take the risk of parting with our funds, for getting higher value back at a later date. Partition it self is a risk.
Well
known economist and Nobel Prize recipient William Sharpe tried to segregate the total risk faced in any kind of investment into two parts - systematic (Systemic) risk and unsystematic (Unsystematic) risk. Systematic risk is that risk which exists in the system. Some of the biggest examples of systematic risk are inflation, recession, war, political situation etc. Inflation erodes returns generated from all investments e .g. If return from fixed deposit is 8 percent and if inflation is 6 per cent then real rate of return from fixed deposit is reduced by 6 percent. Similarly if returns generated from equity market is 18 percent and inflation is still 6 per cent then equity returns will be lesser by the rate of inflation. Since inflation exists in the system there is no way one can stay away from the risk of inflation. Economic cycles, war and political situations have effects on all forms of investments. Also these exist in the system and there is no way to stay away from them. It is like learning to walk.
Anyone who wants to learn to walk has to first fall; you cannot learn to walk
without falling. Similarly, anyone who wants to invest has to first face
systematic risk.
Therefore, one can never make any kind of investment without systematic risk. Another form of risk is unsystematic risk. This risk does not exist in the system and hence is not applicable to all forms of investment. Unsystematic risk is associated with particular form of investment.
Suppose we invest in
stock market and the market falls, then only our investment in equity gets affected OR if we have placed a fixed deposit in particular bank and bank goes bankrupt, than we only lose money placed in that bank. always reduce the
While there is no way to keep away from risk, we can
impact of risk.
Diversification helps in reducing the impact of
unsystematic risk. If our investment is distributed across various asset classes, the impact of unsystematic risk is reduced. If we have placed fixed deposit in several banks, then even if one of the banks goes bankrupt our entire fixed de posit investment is not lost.
Similarly if our equity
investment is in Tata Motors, HLL, Infosys, adverse news about Infosys will only impact investment in Infosys, all other stocks will not have any impact .
To reduce the
impact of systematic risk, we should invest regularly. By investing regularly, we average out the impact of risk.
Mutual fund, as an investment vehicle gives us benefit
diversification and averaging.
of both
Portfolio of mutual funds consists of multiple securities
and hence adverse news about single security will have nominal impact on overall portfolio. By systematically investing in mutual fund, we get benefit of rupee cost averaging.
Mutual
fund as an investment vehicle helps reduce, both, systematic as well a s unsystematic risk
1.2.6 A STUDY OF PORTFOLIO ANALYSIS FROM THE POINT OF FUND MANAGER:
Effective use of portfolio management disciplines improves customer satisfaction, reduces the number of risks problems, and increases success. The goal of portfolio analysis is to realize these same benefits at the portfolio level by applying a consistent structured management approach. The considerations underlying the portfolio analysis is a matter of concern to the fund managers, investors, and researchers alike. This study attempts to answer two questions relating to the portfolio analysis: • Make an average (or fair) return for the level of risk in the portfolio •
To find out the portfolio which best meets the purpose of the investor.
At a minimum, any comprehensive mutual fund selection and analysis approach should include the following generalized processes:
•
Fund selection
•
Fund prioritize/ reprioritize
•
Selection of the acceptable and required fund
•
Fund analysing and monitoring
•
Corrective action management
The fund portfolio analysis gives the ability to select funds that are aligned with the investor’s strategies and objectives. It helps the fund manager to make the best use of available opportunities by applying to the highest priority of the investor. A fund manager can regularly assess how securities and stocks are contributing to portfolio health and can make the corrective action to keep the portfolio in compliance with the investor’s interest and objectives. Mutual funds do not determine risk preference. However, once investor determines his/her return preferences, he/she can choose a mutual fund a large and growing variety of alternative funds designed to meet almost any investment goal. Studies have showed that the funds generally were consistent in meeting investors stated goals for investment strategies, risk, and return. The major benefit of the mutual fund is to diversify the portfolio to eliminate unsystematic risk. The instant diversification of the funds is especially beneficial to the small investors who do not have the resources to acquire 100 shares of 12 or 15 different issues required to reduce unsystematic risk. Mutual funds have generally maintained the stability of their correlation with the market because of reasonably well diversified portfolios. There are some measures for the analysis and each of them provides unique perspectives. These measures evaluate the different components of performance.
1.2.7 MEASURES OF RISK AND RETURN:
Risk is variability in future cash flows. It is also known as uncertainty in the distribution of possible outcomes. A risky situation is one, which has some probability of loss or unexpected results. The higher the probability of loss or unexpected results is, the greater the risk. It is the uncertainty that an investment will earn its expected rate of return. For an investor, evaluating a future investment alternative expects or anticipates a certain rate of return is very important. Portfolio risk management includes processes that identify, analyse, respond to, track, and control any risk that would prevent the portfolio from achieving its business objectives. These processes should include reviews of project level risks with negative implications for the portfolio, ensuring that the project manager has a responsible risk mitigation plan. Additionally, it is important to do a consolidated risk assessment for the portfolio overall to determine whether it is within the already specified limits. Since portfolio and their environments are dynamic, managers should review and update their portfolio risk management plans on a regular basis through the fund life cycle. Simple measure of returns:
The return on mutual fund investment includes both income (in the form of dividends or investment payments) and capital gains or losses (increase or decrease in the value of a security). The return is calculated by taking the change in a fund’s Net Asset Value, which is the market value of securities the fund holds divided by the number of the fund’s shares during a given time period, assuming the reinvestment all income and capital gains distributions, and dividing it by the original net asset value. The return is calculated net of management fees and other expenses charged to the fund. Thus, a fund’s monthly return can be expressed as follows:
Rt= (NAVt- NAVt-1)/NAVt-1 Where, Rt is the return in month t NAVt is the closing net asset value of the fund on the last trading day of the month NAVt-1 is the closing net asset value of the fund on the last day of the previous month
Measure of risk Investors are interested not only in fund’s return but also in risk taken to achieve those returns. So risk can be thought as the uncertainty of the expected return, and uncertainty is generally equated with variability. Variability and the risk are correlated; hence high returns will tend to high variability.
Standard deviation:
in simple terms standard deviation is one of the commonly used statistical parameter to measure risk, which determines the volatility of a fund. Deviation is defined as any variation from a mean value (upward & downward). Since the markets are volatile, the returns fluctuate every day. High standard deviation of a fund implies high volatility and a low standard deviation implies low volatility.
S.D. =√1/T× (Rt-AR) ² Where, S.D. is the periodic standard deviation, AR is the average periodic return, T is the number of observations in the period for which the standard deviation is being calculated. Rt is the return in month t
Beta analysis: ) β (Beta) Co-efficient:
Systematic risk is measured in terms of Beta, which represents fluctuations in the NAV of the fund vis-à-vis market. The more responsive the NAV of a Mutual Fund is to the changes in the market; higher will be its beta. Beta is calculated by relating the returns on a Mutual Fund with the returns in the market. While unsystematic risk can be diversified through investments in a number of instruments, systematic risk cannot. By using the risk return
relationship, we try to assess the competitive strength of the Mutual Funds vis-à-vis one another in a better way.
β (Beta) is calculated as = [N (Σ XY) – Σ XΣ Y]/ [N (Σ X2) – (Σ X) 2 ]
Beta is used to measure the risk. It basically indicates the level of volatility associated with the fund as compared to the market. In case of funds, as compared to the market. In case of funds, beta would indicate the volatility against the benchmark index. It is used as a short term decision making tool. A beta that is greater than 1 means that the fund is more volatile than the benchmark index, while a beta of less than 1 means that the fund is more volatile than the benchmark index. A fund with a beta very close to 1 means the fund’s performance closely matches the index or benchmark. The success of beta is heavily dependent on the correlation between a fund and its benchmark. Thus, if the fund’s portfolio doesn’t have a relevant benchmark index then a beta would be grossly inappropriate. For example if we are considering a banking fund, we should look at the beta against a bank index. R-Squared (R2):
R squared is the square of ‘R’ (i.e.; coefficient of correlation). It describes the level of association between the fun’s market volatility and market risk. The value of R- squared ranges from0 to1. A high R- squared (more than 0.80) indicates that beta can be used as a reliable measure to analyze the performance of a fund. Beta should be ignored when the rsquared is low as it indicates that the fund performance is affected by factors other than the markets. For example: Case 1
Case 2
R2
0.65
0.88
B
1.2
0.9
In the above tableR2 is less than 0.80 in case 1, implies that it would be wrong to mention that the fund is aggressive on account of high beta. In case 2, the r- squared is more than 0.85 and beta value is 0.9. it means that this fund is less aggressive than the market. Portfolio turnover ratio:
Portfolio turnover is a measure of a fund's trading activity and is calculated by dividing the lesser of purchases or sales (excluding securities with maturities of less than one year) by the average monthly net assets of the fund. Turnover is simply a measure of the percentage of portfolio value that has been transacted, not an indication of the percentage of a fund's holdings that have been changed. Portfolio turnover is the purchase and sale of securities in a fund's portfolio. A ratio of 100%, then, means the fund has bought and sold all its positions within the last year. Turnover is important when investing in any mutual fund, since the amount of turnover affects the fees and costs within the mutual fund. Total expenses ratio: A measure of the total costs associated with managing and operating an investment fund such as a mutual fund. These costs consist primarily of management fees and additional expenses such as trading fees, legal fees, auditor fees and other operational expenses. The total cost of the
fund is
divided
by
the fund's
total
assets
to
arrive
amount, which represents the TER: Total expense ratio = (Total fund Costs/ Total fund Assets)
The most important and widely used measures of performance are: The Sharpe Measure The Treynor’Measure Jenson Model Fama Model
The Sharpe Measure :-
at a
percentage
In this model, performance of a fund is evaluated on the basis of Sharpe Ratio, which is a ratio of returns generated by the fund over and above risk free rate of return and the total risk associated with it. According to Sharpe, it is the total risk of the fund that the investors are concerned about. So, the model evaluates funds on the basis of reward per unit of total risk. Symbolically, it can be written as:
Sharpe Ratio (Si) = (Ri - Rf)/Si
Where, Si is standard deviation of the fund, Ri represents return on fund, and Rf is risk free rate of return.
While a high and positive Sharpe Ratio shows a superior risk-adjusted performance of a fund, a low and negative Sharpe Ratio is an indication of unfavourable performance.
The Treynor Measure: Developed by Jack Treynor, this performance measure evaluates funds on the basis of Treynor's Index. This Index is a ratio of return generated by the fund over and above risk free rate of return (generally taken to be the return on securities backed by the government, as there is no credit risk associated), during a given period and systematic risk associated with it (beta). Symbolically, it can be represented as:
Treynor's Index (Ti) = (Ri - Rf)/Bi. Where, Ri represents return on fund, Rf is risk free rate of return, and Bi is beta of the fund.
All risk-averse investors would like to maximize this value. While a high and positive Treynor's Index shows a superior risk-adjusted performance of a fund, a low and negative Treynor's Index is an indication of unfavorable performance. Comparison of Sharpe and Treynor Sharpe and Treynor measures are similar in a way, since they both divide the risk premium by a numerical risk measure. The total risk is appropriate when we are evaluating the risk return relationship for well-diversified portfolios. On the other hand, the systematic risk is the relevant measure of risk when we are evaluating less than fully diversified portfolios or individual stocks. For a well-diversified portfolio the total risk is equal to systematic risk. Rankings based on total risk (Sharpe measure) and systematic risk (Treynor measure) should be identical for a well-diversified portfolio, as the total risk is reduced to systematic risk. Therefore, a poorly diversified fund that ranks higher on Treynor measure, compared with another fund that is highly diversified, will rank lower on Sharpe Measure.
Jenson Model: Jenson's model proposes another risk adjusted performance measure. This measure was developed by Michael Jenson and is sometimes referred to as the differential Return Method. This measure involves evaluation of the returns that the fund has generated vs. the returns actually expected out of the fund1 given the level of its systematic risk. The surplus between the two returns is called Alpha, which measures the performance of a fund compared with the actual returns over the period. Required return of a fund at a given level of risk (Bi) can be calculated as:
E(Ri) = Rf + Bi (Rm - Rf) Where, E(Ri) represents expected return on fund, and Rm is average market return during the given period, Rf is risk free rate of return, and Bi is Beta deviation of the fund.
After calculating it, Alpha can be obtained by subtracting required return from the actual return of the fund.
αp= Ri –[ Rf + Bi (Rm - Rf) ]
Higher alpha represents superior performance of the fund and vice versa. Limitation of this model is that it considers only systematic risk not the entire risk associated with the fund and an ordinary investor cannot mitigate unsystematic risk, as his knowledge of market is primitive.
Fama Model: The Eugene Fama model is an extension of Jenson model. This model compares the performance, measured in terms of returns, of a fund with the required return commensurate with the total risk associated with it. The difference between these two is taken as a measure of the performance of the fund and is called Net Selectivity. The Net Selectivity represents the stock selection skill of the fund manager, as it is the excess returns over and above the return required to compensate for the total risk taken by the fund manager. Higher value of which indicates that fund manager has earned returns well above the return commensurate with the level of risk taken by him.
Selectivity: measures the ability of the portfolio manager to earn a return that is consistent with the portfolio’s market (systematic) risk. The selectivity measure is:
Ri –[ Rf + Bi (Rm - Rf) ] Diversification: measures the extent to which the portfolio may not have been completely diversified. Diversification is measured as:
[Rf +(Rm - Rf)(αi/ αm)]-[Rf + Bi (Rm - Rf)] If the portfolio is completely diversified, contains no unsystematic risk, then diversification measure would be zero. A positive diversification measure indicates that the portfolio is not completely diversified; it would contain unsystematic risk and it represents the extra return that the portfolio should earn for not being completely diversified. The performance of the portfolio can be measured as: Net selectivity = selectivity – diversification Net selectivity measures, how well the portfolio mangers did manager did at earning a fair return for the portfolio’ systematic risk and diversifying away unsystematic risk. Positive net selectivity indicates that the fund earned a better return. The comparison, done based on sharpe ratio, Treynor measure, Jensen alpha, and Fema measure notifies that the portfolio performance can be evaluated on the following basis: Sahrpe ratio: measures the reward to total risk trade off Treynor: measures the reward to systematic risk trade off Jensen’s alpha: measures the average return over and above that predicted. Fema measure: measures return of portfolio for its systematic risk and diversifying away unsystematic risk. Among the above performance measures, two models namely, Treynor measure and Jenson model use Systematic risk is based on the premise that the Unsystematic risk is diversifiable. These models are suitable for large investors like institutional investors with high risk taking capacities as they do not face paucity of funds and can invest in a number of options to dilute some risks. For them, a portfolio can be spread across a number of stocks and sectors.
However, Sharpe measure and Fama model that consider the entire risk associated with fund are suitable for small investors, as the ordinary investor lacks the necessary skill and resources to diversify. Moreover, the selection of the fund on the basis of superior stock selection ability of the fund manager will also help in safeguarding the money invested to a great extent. The investment in funds that have generated big returns at higher levels of risks leaves the money all the more prone to risks of all kinds that may exceed the individual investors' risk appetite.
PART-II
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 2.1 NEED FOR THE STUDY The Mutual Fund Companies periodically build up a study, which can prioritize and analyse the portfolio of the mutual funds. This study is helpful in having a comparison among the mutual funds based on the risk bearing capacity and expected return of the investor and will also carry out an analysis of the portfolio of the selected mutual fund. The mutual fund industry is growing globally and new products are emerging in the market with all captivating promises of providing high return. It has become difficult for the investors to choose the best fund for their needs or in other words to find out a fund which will give maximum return for minimum risk. Therefore, they turn to their financial adviser to get precise direct investment. Hence, the company asked me to prepare a model, which will facilitate them to analyse the fund and to have reasonable estimation for the fund performance. The driving force of Mutual Funds is the ‘safety of the principal’ guaranteed, plus the added advantage of capital appreciation together with the income earned in the form of interest or dividend. The various schemes of Mutual Funds provide the investor with a wide range of investment options according to his risk bearing capacities and interest besides; they also give
handy return to the investor. Mutual Funds offers an investor to invest even a small amount of money, each Mutual Fund has a defined investment objective and strategy. Mutual Funds schemes are managed by respective asset managed companies, sponsored by financial institutions, banks, private companies or international firms. A Mutual Fund is the ideal investment vehicle for today’s complex and modern financial scenario.
The study is basically made to analyze the various open-ended equity schemes of HDFC Asset Management Company to highlight the diversity of investment that Mutual Fund offer. Thus, through the study one would understand how a common person could fruitfully convert a meagre amount into great penny by wisely investing into the right scheme according to his risk taking abilities.
Sharpe ratio is a performance measure, which reflects the excess return earned on a portfolio per unit of its total risk (standard deviation). Treynor measure indicates the risk premium return per unit risk of the portfolio. While Jensen alpha talks about the deviation of the actual return from its expected one. Fema measure decomposes the portfolio total return into two main components: systematic return and the unsystematic return. It determines whether the portfolio is perfectly diversified or not. Hence, it is a significant measure to evaluate the performance of the fund manager. The analysis of the fund portfolio has been done to find out the influence of the top holdings on the performance of the fund. All these measures give fair implication and results about the portfolio performance and can show the ground reality to a rational investor.
2.2 OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
Whether the growth oriented Mutual Fund are earning higher returns than the benchmark returns (or market Portfolio/Index returns) in terms of risk.
Whether the growth oriented mutual funds are offering the advantages of Diversification, Market timing and Selectivity of Securities to their investors
This study provides a proper investigation for logical and reasonable comparison and selection of the funds. It also assists in analysing the portfolio of the selected funds.
2.3 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
The study is limited only to the analysis of different schemes and its suitability to different investors according to their risk-taking ability. The study is based on secondary data available from monthly fact sheets, websites and other books, as primary data was not accessible. The study is limited by the detailed study of six schemes of HDFFC.
Many investors are all price takers. The assumption that all investors have the same information and beliefs about the distribution of returns. Banks are free to accept deposits at any interest rate within the ceilings fixed by the
Reserve Bank of India and interest rate can vary from client to client. Hence, there can be inaccuracy in the risk free rates. The study excludes the entry and the exit loads of the mutual funds.
2.4 DATA COLLECTION The Methodology involves the selected Open-Ended equity schemes of HDFC mutual fund for the purpose of risk return and comparative analysis the competitive funds. The data collected for this project is basically from secondary sources, they are; The monthly fact sheets of HDFC AMC fund house and research reports from banks.
The NAVs of the funds have been taken from AMFI websites for the period starting from 31 st jan 2007 to 31st May, 2009. For the Benchmark prices, data has been taken from BSE and NSE sites.
Part-III
CASE ANALYSIS 3.1 DATA INTERPRETATION Risk returns analysis and comparative study of funds In this section, a sample of HDFC equity related funds have been studied, evaluated and analysed. This study could facilitate to get a fair comparison. The expectations of the study are to give value to the funds by keeping the risk in the view. Here equity funds are taken as they bear high return with high risk.
Following are the products of HDFC Mutual Fund, which have been taken the evaluation purpose. HDFC Equity Fund Growth option HDFC Capital Builder HDFC Growth Fund HDFC Long Term Advantage Fund HDFC Top 200 Fund
HDFC EQUITY FUND
Investment Objective The investment objective of the Scheme is to achieve capital appreciation. Basic Scheme Information Table:3.1
Nature of Scheme
Open Ended Growth Scheme
Inception Date
Jan 01, 1995
Option/Plan
Dividend Option, Growth Option,
Entry Load
NIL
(purchase / additional purchase / switch-
(With effect from August 1, 2009)
in)
Exit Load.
Nil
(as a % of the Applicable NAV) Minimum Application Amount
Rs.5000 and in multiples of Rs.100 thereof to open an account / folio. Additional purchases is Rs. 1000 and in multiples of Rs. 100 thereof
Lock-In-Period
Nil
Net Asset Value Periodicity
Every Business Day
Redemption Proceeds
Normally despatched within 3 Business days
Investment Pattern The asset allocation under the Scheme will be as follows: Table:3.2
SR NO.
TYPE OF INSTRUMENTS
NORMAL ALLOCATION (%of net asset)
1
Equities & Equities related
RISK PROFILE
80-100
Medium to high
0-100
Low to medium
instruments 2
Debt securities, money market instruments & cash
Investment in Securitised debt, if undertaken, would not exceed 20% of the net assets of the scheme. The Scheme may also invest upto 25% of net assets of the Scheme in derivatives such as Futures & Options and such other derivative instruments as may be introduced from time to time for the purpose of hedging and portfolio balancing and other uses as may be permitted under the Regulations. Investment Strategy & Risk Control In order to provide long term capital appreciation, the Scheme will invest predominantly in growth companies. Companies selected under this portfolio would as far as practicable consist of medium to large sized companies which: are likely achieved above average growth than the industry; enjoy distinct competitive advantages, and have superior financial strengths. The aim will be to build a portfolio, which represents a cross-section of the strong growth companies in the prevailing market. In order to reduce the risk of volatility, the Scheme will diversify across major industries and economic sectors. Benchmark Index : S&P CNX 500. HDFC Equity, which is benchmarked to S&P CNX 500 Index is not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by Indian Index Service & Products Limited (IISL).
Fund Manager : Mr. Prashant Jain
HDFC EQUITY FUND-GROWTH OPTION Table:3.3 NAV
S&P
Ri
Rm
Ri Rm
CNX
Rm-Rm
sqr(Rm-
av
Rm av)
Rm2
500 2007
151.389
4899.39
FEB
141.228
4504.73
-6.71185
-8.05529
54.06587
-9.0864
82.56268
64.88767
MAR
142.602
4605.89
0.972895
2.24564
2.184771
1.214527
1.475077
5.042897
APL
151.16
4934.46
6.001318
7.133692
42.81156
6.10258
37.24148
50.88956
MAY
161.281
5185.95
6.695554
5.096606
34.1246
4.065494
16.52824
25.9754
JUN
165.313
5223.82
2.499984
0.730242
1.825594
-0.30087
0.090523
0.533254
JULY
172.325
5483.25
4.241651
4.966289
21.06526
3.935177
15.48562
24.66403
AUG
168.827
5411.29
-2.02989
-1.31236
2.663941
-2.34347
5.491863
1.72229
SEP
182.84
6094.11
8.300213
12.61843
104.7357
11.58732
134.266
159.2248
OCT
210.3
7163.3
15.0186
17.54465
263.4959
16.51353
272.6968
307.8146
NOV
206.176
6997.6
-1.96101
-2.31318
4.536164
-3.34429
11.18429
5.3508
DEC
223.324
7461.48
8.317166
6.62913
55.13557
5.598018
31.3378
43.94536
2008
188.42
6245.45
-15.6293
-16.2974
254.7177
-17.3285
300.2786
265.6065
FEB
187.594
6356.92
-0.43838
1.784819
-0.78243
0.753707
0.568075
3.18558
MAR
165.788
5762.88
-11.624
-9.34478
108.6241
-10.3759
107.6591
87.32486
APL
178.191
6289.07
7.481241
9.130678
68.3088
8.099566
65.60296
83.36928
MAY
169.605
5937.81
-4.81843
-5.58525
26.91209
-6.61636
43.77619
31.19497
JUN
143.171
4929.98
-15.5856
-16.9731
264.5363
-18.0042
324.1514
288.0859
JULY
151.715
5297.47
5.967689
7.454188
44.48428
6.423076
41.25591
55.56493
AUG
158.924
5337.28
4.751673
0.751491
3.570838
-0.27962
0.078188
0.564738
JAN
JAN
SEP
145.721
4807.2
-8.30774
-9.93165
82.50962
-10.9628
120.1822
98.63768
OCT
110.322
3539.57
-24.2923
-26.3694
640.5738
-27.4005
750.7883
695.3455
NOV
101.808
3379.53
-7.71741
-4.52145
34.8939
-5.55257
30.83098
20.44354
DEC
112.377
3635.87
10.38131
7.585078
78.74302
6.553966
42.95447
57.53341
2009
103.754
3538.57
-7.67328
-2.67611
20.53456
-3.70723
13.74352
7.161582
FEB
98.163
3403.33
-5.38871
-3.82188
20.59501
-4.85299
23.55156
14.60679
MAR
108.852
3720.51
10.88903
9.319696
101.4825
8.288584
68.70062
86.85673
APL
127.097
4278.54
16.76129
14.99875
251.3984
13.96764
195.0949
224.9625
MAY
169.897
5480.11
33.67507
28.08365
945.7186
27.05253
731.8396
788.6911
Total
29.7767
28.87114
3533.466
0
3469.417
3499.186
average
1.063454
1.031112
126.1952
0
123.9077
JAN
Figure:3.1
σm= √123.9077 =11.13239
β (Beta) =[N (Σ XY) – Σ XΣ Y ]/[ N (Σ X2) – (Σ X) 2 ] = (98937.047- 859.6872)/( 97977.214- 833.54264) = 98077.36/ 97143.672 = 1.0096114
Table:3.4 Ri
Rm
Ri-Rm
Dev frm ave
sq of Dev frm av
FEB
-6.71185
-8.05529
1.34344
-1.3111
1.71898
MAR
0.972895
2.24564
-1.27274
1.305086
1.70325
APL
6.001318
7.133692
-1.13237
1.164715
1.356561
MAY
6.695554
5.096606
1.598948
-1.56661
2.454256
JUN
2.499984
0.730242
1.769742
0.75698
0.573018
JULY
4.241651
4.966289
-0.72464
0.75698
0.573018
AUG
-2.02989
-1.31236
-0.71753
0.749866
0.5623
SEP
8.300213
12.61843
-4.31822
4.350562
18.92739
OCT
15.0186
17.54465
-2.52605
2.558392
6.545367
NOV
-1.96101
-2.31318
0.352172
-0.31983
0.102291
DEC
8.317166
6.62913
1.688036
-1.65569
2.741324
2008
-15.6293
-16.2974
0.668127
-0.63579
0.404223
2007 JAN
JAN
FEB
-0.43838
1.784819
-2.2232
2.255543
5.087475
MAR
-11.624
-9.34478
-2.27926
2.311604
5.343511
APL
7.481241
9.130678
-1.64944
1.681778
2.828377
MAY
-4.81843
-5.58525
0.76682
-0.73448
0.539459
JUN
-15.5856
-16.9731
1.387467
-1.35513
1.836366
JULY
5.967689
7.454188
-1.4865
1.518841
2.306878
AUG
4.751673
0.751491
4.000182
-3.96784
15.74376
SEP
-8.30774
-9.93165
1.623906
-1.59156
2.533078
OCT
-24.2923
-26.3694
2.077092
-2.04475
4.181006
NOV
-7.71741
-4.52145
-3.19596
3.228297
10.4219
DEC
10.38131
7.585078
2.796228
-2.76389
7.639067
2009
-7.67328
-2.67611
-4.99717
5.029507
25.29594
FEB
-5.38871
-3.82188
-1.56683
1.599166
2.557333
MAR
10.88903
9.319696
1.569336
-1.53699
2.362352
APL
16.76129
14.99875
1.76254
-1.7302
2.993588
MAY
33.67507
28.08365
5.591422
-5.55908
30.90337
Total
29.7767
28.87114
0.90556
160.2354
avrage
1.063454
1.031112
0.032341
5.722694
JAN
Standard Deviation for the fund’s excess return (S.D.) σi=√5.722694 =2.392215
Sharpe Index (Si) = (Ri - Rf)/Si = (1.063454-5)/ 2.392215 =-1.64557
Treynor's Index (Ti) = (Ri - Rf)/Bi. =(1.063454-5)/ 1.0096114 =-3.89907 Jenson alpha (αp)= Ri –[ Rf + Bi (Rm - Rf) ] = 1.063454 - [ 5+1.0096114 (1.031112-5)] =0.070488
Expected return E(Ri) = Rf + Bi (Rm - Rf) =[ 5+1.0096114 (1.031112-5)] =0.992965 Fema Measures Selectivity =Ri –[ Rf + Bi (Rm - Rf) ] =
1.063454 - [ 5+1.0096114 (1.031112-5)]
=0.070488
Diversification =[Rf + (Rm - Rf)(αi/ αm)]-[Rf + Bi (Rm - Rf) ] =[5+(1.031112-5)(2.392215/11.13139)]- [ 5+1.0096114 (1.031112-5)] =3.154092 Net selectivity= selectivity- diversification =0.070488-3.15409 =-3.0836
HDFC CAPITAL BUILDER FUND
Investment Objective The Investment Objective of the Scheme is to achieve capital appreciation in the long term. Basic Scheme Information
Nature of Scheme
Open Ended Growth Scheme
Inception Date
February 01, 1994
Option/Plan
Dividend Option,Growth Option. The Dividend Option offers Dividend Payout and Reinvestment Facility.
Entry Load
NIL
(purchase / additional
(With effect from August 1, 2009)
purchase / switch-in)
Exit Load
•
In respect of each purchase / switch-in of Units less
(as a % of the Applicable
than Rs. 5 crore in value, an Exit Load of 1.00% is
NAV)
payable if Units are
(Other than Systematic
redeemed/switched-out within 1 year from the date of
Investment Plan (SIP)/
allotment.
Systematic Transfer Plan (STP))
•
In respect of each purchase / switch-in of Units equal to or greater than Rs. 5 crore in value, no Exit Load is payable. No Exit Load shall be levied on bonus units and units allotted on dividend reinvestment.
Minimum Application
For new investors :Rs.5000 and any amount thereafter.
Amount
For existing investors : Rs. 1000 and any amount thereafter.
(Other than Systematic Investment Plan (SIP)/ Systematic Transfer Plan
(STP)) Lock-In-Period
Nil
Net Asset Value Periodicity
Every Business Day.
Redemption Proceeds
Normally despatched within 3 business Days
Current Expense Ratio (#)
On the first 100 crores average weekly net assets 2.50%
(Effective Date 22nd May
On the next 300 crores average weekly net assets 2.25%
2009)
On the next 300 crores average weekly net assets 2.00% On the balance of the assets 1.75%
Pattern The asset allocation under the Scheme will be as follows : Sr.No.
Asset Type
(% of Portfolio)
1
Equities and Equity Related Instruments Upto 100%
2
Debt & Money Market Instruments
Risk Profile Medium to High
Not more than 20% Low to Medium
Investment in Securitised debt, if undertaken, would not exceed 20% of the net assets of the scheme. Investment Strategy This Scheme aims to achieve its objectives by investing in strong companies at prices which are below fair value in the opinion of the fund managers. The Scheme defines a "strong company" as one that has the following characteristics : •
strong management, characterized by competence and integrity
•
strong position in its business (preferably market leadership)
•
efficiency of operations, as evidenced by profit margins and asset turnover, compared to its peers in the industry
•
working capital efficiency
•
consistent surplus cash generation
•
high profitability indicators (returns on funds employed)
In common parlance, such companies are also called 'Blue Chips'. The Scheme defines "reasonable prices" as : •
a market price quote that is around 30% lower than its value, as determined by the discounted value of its estimated future cash flows
•
a P/E multiple that is lower than the company's sustainable Return on funds employed
•
a P/E to growth ratio that is lower than those of the company's competitors
•
in case of companies in cyclical businesses, a market price quote that is around 50% lower than its estimated replacement cost
Fund Manager Mr. Chirag Setalvad (since Apr 2, 07) Mr. Anand Laddha - Dedicated Fund Manager - Foreign Securities
HDFC CAPITAL BUILDER FUND Table:3.5 NAV
S&P CNX 500
2007 JAN
64.459
4899.39
FEB
61.259
4504.73
Ri
Rm
Ri Rm
Rm-Rm av
sqr(RmRm av)
Rm2
-4.9644
-8.05529
39.98964
-9.0864
82.5626 8
64.88 767
MAR
60.3
4605.89
-1.56548
2.24564
-3.51551
1.214527
1.47507 7
5.042 897
APL
65.818
4934.46
9.150912
7.133692
65.27979
6.10258
37.2414 8
50.88 956
MAY
69.818
5185.95
6.077365
5.096606
30.97394
4.065494
16.5282 4
25.97 54
JUN
73.27
5223.82
4.944284
0.730242
3.610525
-0.30087
0.09052 3
0.533 254
JULY
76.914
5483.25
4.973386
4.966289
24.69927
3.935177
15.4856 2
24.66 403
AUG
76.323
5411.29
-0.76839
-1.31236
1.008405
-2.34347
5.49186 3
1.722 29
SEP
83.09
6094.11
8.866266
12.61843
111.8784
11.58732
134.266
159.2 248
OCT
96.061
7163.3
15.61078
17.54465
273.8857
16.51353
272.696 8
307.8 146
NOV
99.034
6997.6
3.094908
-2.31318
-7.15908
-3.34429
11.1842 9
5.350 8
DEC
106.53 8
7461.48
7.577196
6.62913
50.23022
5.598018
31.3378
43.94 536
2008 JAN
88.367
6245.45
-17.0559
-16.2974
277.9672
-17.3285
300.278 6
265.6 065
FEB
87.439
6356.92
-1.05017
1.784819
-1.87436
0.753707
0.56807 5
3.185 58
MAR
75.967
5762.88
-13.12
-9.34478
122.6035
-10.3759
107.659 1
87.32 486
APL
79.418
6289.07
4.542762
9.130678
41.4785
8.099566
65.6029 6
83.36 928
MAY
75.065
5937.81
-5.48113
-5.58525
30.61343
-6.61636
43.7761 9
31.19 497
JUN
64.169
4929.98
-14.5154
-16.9731
246.3716
-18.0042
324.151 4
288.0 859
JULY
67.228
5297.47
4.767099
7.454188
35.53486
6.423076
41.2559 1
55.56 493
AUG
70.149
5337.28
4.344916
0.751491
3.265164
-0.27962
0.07818 8
0.564 738
SEP
63.365
4807.2
-9.67084
-9.93165
96.04744
-10.9628
120.182 2
98.63 768
OCT
47.587
3539.57
-24.9002
-26.3694
656.603
-27.4005
750.788
695.3
3
455
NOV
44.556
3379.53
-6.36939
-4.52145
28.79888
-5.55257
30.8309 8
20.44 354
DEC
48.064
3635.87
7.873238
7.585078
59.71913
6.553966
42.9544 7
57.53 341
2009 JAN
45.564
3538.57
-5.2014
-2.67611
13.91953
-3.70723
13.7435 2
7.161 582
FEB
43.34
3403.33
-4.88105
-3.82188
18.65479
-4.85299
23.5515 6
14.60 679
MAR
46.604
3720.51
7.531149
9.319696
70.18802
8.288584
68.7006 2
86.85 673
APL
53.006
4278.54
13.73702
14.99875
206.0381
13.96764
195.094 9
224.9 625
MAY
67.6
5480.11
27.53273
28.08365
773.2195
27.05253
731.839 6
788.6 911
TOTAL
21.08029
28.87114
3270.029
0
3469.41 7
3499. 186
AVERA GE
0.752867
1.031112
116.7868
0
123.907 7
Figure:3.2
σm = √123.9077 =11.13239
β (Beta) =[N (Σ XY) – Σ XΣ Y ]/[ N (Σ X2) – (Σ X) 2 ] = (91560.82- 608.6119)/ (97977.21- 833.5426) = 90952.21/ 97143.67 = 0.936265
Table:3.6
Ri
Rm
Ri-Rm
Dev frm ave
sq of Dev frm av
FEB
-4.9644
-8.05529
3.090893
-3.36914
11.35109
MAR
-1.56548
2.24564
-3.81112
3.532879
12.48124
APL
9.150912
7.13369 2
2.01722
-2.29546
5.269159
MAY
6.077365
5.09660 6
0.980759
-1.259
1.585089
JUN
4.944284
0.73024 2
4.214041
-4.49229
20.18063
JULY
4.973386
4.96628 9
0.007097
-0.28534
0.08142
AUG
-0.76839
-1.31236
0.54397
-0.82221
0.676037
SEP
8.866266
12.6184 3
-3.75217
3.473923
12.06814
OCT
15.61078
17.5446 5
-1.93386
1.655617
2.741069
NOV
3.094908
-2.31318
5.408088
-5.68633
32.33438
DEC
7.577196
6.62913
0.948066
-1.22631
1.503837
2008 JAN
-17.0559
-16.2974
-0.75845
0.480204
0.230596
FEB
-1.05017
1.78481 9
-2.83499
2.55674
6.536922
MAR
-13.12
-9.34478
-3.77523
3.496982
12.22888
APL
4.542762
9.13067 8
-4.58792
4.309671
18.57326
MAY
-5.48113
-5.58525
0.10412
-0.38237
0.146203
JUN
-14.5154
-16.9731
2.457673
-2.73592
7.485245
JULY
4.767099
7.45418 8
-2.68709
2.408844
5.802531
AUG
4.344916
0.75149 1
3.593425
-3.87167
14.98983
SEP
-9.67084
-9.93165
0.260807
-0.53905
0.290577
OCT
-24.9002
-26.3694
1.469223
-1.74747
3.053642
NOV
-6.36939
-4.52145
-1.84793
1.569689
2.463923
2007 JAN
DEC
7.873238
7.58507 8
0.28816
-0.5664
0.320814
2009 JAN
-5.2014
-2.67611
-2.52528
2.24704
5.049189
FEB
-4.88105
-3.82188
-1.05916
0.780919
0.609834
MAR
7.531149
9.31969 6
-1.78855
1.510302
2.281012
APL
13.73702
14.9987 5
-1.26173
0.983487
0.967247
MAY
27.53273
28.0836 5
-0.55091
0.272669
0.074348
TOTAL
21.08029
28.8711 4
-7.79085
181.3761
0.75286 7
1.03111 2
-0.27824
6.477719
AVERAGE
Standard Deviation for the fund’s excess return (S.D.) σi=√6.477719 =2.545136 Sharpe Index (Si) = (Ri - Rf)/Si = (0.752867-5)/ 2.545136 =-1.66872 Treynor's Index (Ti) = (Ri - Rf)/Bi. =(0.752867-5/ 0.936265 =-4.53625 Jenson alpha (αp)= Ri –[ Rf + Bi (Rm - Rf) ] =0.752867 -
[5+0.936265(1.031112-5)] =
-0.39357
Expected return E(Ri) = Rf + Bi (Rm - Rf) =[5+0.936265(1.031112-5)] =1.284069
Fema Measures Selectivity =Ri –[ Rf + Bi (Rm - Rf) ] =0.75286 7-
=
[5+0.936265(1.031112-5)]
-0.39357
Diversification =[Rf + (Rm - Rf)(αi/ αm)]-[Rf + Bi (Rm - Rf) ] =[5+(1.031112-5)( 2.545136/11.13139)]- [5+0.936265(1.031112-5)] =2.808464 Net selectivity= selectivity- diversification =-0.39357-2.808464 =-3.33967
HDFC GROWTH FUND Investment objective The primary investment objective of the Scheme is to generate long term capital appreciation from a portfolio that is invested predominantly in equity and equity related instruments. Basic Scheme Information Table:3.7
Nature of Scheme
Open Ended Growth Scheme
Inception Date
Sep 11, 2000
Option/Plan
Dividend Option, Growth Option,
Entry Load
NIL
(purchase / additional purchase / switch-
(With effect from August 1, 2009)
in)
Exit Load.
Nil
(as a % of the Applicable NAV) Minimum Application Amount
Rs.5000 and in multiples of Rs.100 thereof to open an account / folio. Additional purchases is Rs. 1000 and in multiples of Rs. 100 thereof
Lock-In-Period
Nil
Net Asset Value Periodicity
Every Business Day
Redemption Proceeds
Normally despatched within 3 Business days
Investment pattern The corpus of the Scheme will be invested primarily in equity and equity related instruments. The Scheme may invest a part of its corpus in debt and money market instruments, in order to manage its liquidity requirements from time to time, and under certain circumstances, to protect the interests of the Unit holders. The asset allocation under the Scheme will be as follows : Table:3.8
SR
TYPE OF INSTRUMENTS
NO.
NORMAL ALLOCATION (%of net asset)
1
Equities & Equities related
80-100
instruments 2
Debt securities, money market instruments & cash
RISK PROFILE Medium to high
0-100
Low to medium
Investment Strategy & Risk Control The investment approach will be based on a set of well established but flexible principles that emphasise the concept of sustainable economic earnings and cash return on investment as the means of valuation of companies. In summary, the Investment Strategy is expected to be a function of extensive research and based on data and reasoning, rather than current fashion and emotion. The objective will be to identify "businesses with superior growth prospects and good management, at a reasonable price". Benchmark Index : SENSEX Fund Manager : Mr. Shrinivas Rao
HDFC GROWTH FUND Table:3.9 NAV
SENSEX
Ri
Rm
Ri Rm
Rm-Rm av
sqr(RmRm av)
Rm2
2007 JAN
48.917
14090.92
FEB
45.047
12938.09
-7.91136
-8.18137
64.72575
-8.91997
79.56584
66.93478
MAR
45.461
13072.1
0.91904
1.035779
0.951922
0.297178
0.088315
1.072838
APL
48.581
13872.37
6.863025
6.12197
42.01523
5.383369
28.98066
37.47851
MAY
53.198
14544.46
9.503715
4.84481
46.0437
4.106209
16.86095
23.47219
JUN
54.695
14650.51
2.814016
0.729144
2.051821
-0.00946
8.94E-05
0.53165
JULY
58.716
15550.99
7.351677
6.146407
45.1864
5.407806
29.24437
37.77832
AUG
58.17
15318.6
-0.9299
-1.49437
1.389618
-2.23298
4.986179
2.233155
SEP
63.82
17291.1
9.71291
12.8765
125.0683
12.1379
147.3287
165.8043
OCT
73.682
19837.99
15.45284
14.72949
227.6123
13.99088
195.7448
216.9577
NOV
74.895
19363.19
1.646264
-2.39339
-3.94015
-3.13199
9.809352
5.728304
DEC
80.576
20286.99
7.585286
4.770908
36.1887
4.032307
16.2595
22.76156
2008 JAN
68.432
17648.71
-15.0715
-13.0048
196.0015
-13.7434
188.8807
169.1245
FEB
67.827
17578.72
-0.88409
-0.39657
0.350606
-1.13517
1.28862
0.15727
MAR
62.15
15644.44
-8.36982
-11.0035
92.09761
-11.7421
137.8777
121.0777
APL
66.196
17287.31
6.510056
10.5013
68.36407
9.762702
95.31035
110.2774
MAY
62.813
16415.57
-5.11058
-5.04266
25.77091
-5.78126
33.42296
25.4284
JUN
53.472
13461.6
-14.8711
-17.9949
267.6048
-18.7335
350.9451
323.8174
JULY
56.819
14355.75
6.259351
6.642227
41.57603
5.903626
34.8528
44.11918
AUG
58.871
14564.53
3.611468
1.45433
5.252267
0.715729
0.512268
2.115076
SEP
54.54
12860.43
-7.35676
-11.7003
86.07665
-12.4389
154.7273
136.898
OCT
42.283
9788.06
-22.4734
-23.8901
536.8922
-24.6287
606.5731
570.737
NOV
40.089
9092.72
-5.18885
-7.10396
36.86137
-7.84256
61.50578
50.46627
DEC
41.652
9647.31
3.898825
6.099275
23.78001
5.360674
28.73683
37.20116
2009 JAN
38.443
9424.24
-7.70431
-2.31225
17.8143
-3.05085
9.307696
5.346504
FEB
36.429
8891.61
-5.23893
-5.6517
29.60885
-6.3903
40.83598
31.94174
MAR
38.73
9708.5
6.316396
9.1872
58.03
8.448599
71.37883
84.40465
APL
44.131
11403.25
13.94526
17.45635
243.4334
16.71775
279.4832
304.7242
MAY
56.982
14625.25
29.12012
28.2551
822.792
27.5165
757.1579
798.3508
TOTAL
30.39962
20.68083
3139.6
0
3381.666
3396.941
AVG
1.085701
0.738601
112.1286
0
120.7738
Figure:3.3
σm= √120.7738 =10.98971 β (Beta) =[N (Σ XY) – Σ XΣ Y ]/[ N (Σ X2) – (Σ X) 2 ] = (87908.8-628.6893)/ (95114.34-427.6966)
= 87280.12/ 94686.64 = 0.921779
Table:3.10 Ri
Rm
Ri-Rm
Dev frm ave
sq of Dev frm av
Rm2
FEB
-7.91136
-8.18137
0.270008
0.077092104
0.005943
66.93478
MAR
0.91904
1.035779
-0.11674
0.463838642
0.215146
1.072838
APL
6.863025
6.12197
0.741056
-0.393955855
0.155201
37.47851
MAY
9.503715
4.84481
4.658905
-4.311805316
18.59167
23.47219
JUN
2.814016
0.729144
2.084872
-1.737772055
3.019852
0.53165
JULY
7.351677
6.146407
1.20527
-0.85817039
0.736456
37.77832
AUG
-0.9299
-1.49437
0.564474
-0.217374552
0.047252
2.233155
SEP
9.71291
12.8765
-3.16359
3.510692544
12.32496
165.8043
OCT
15.45284
14.72949
0.723351
-0.376251086
0.141565
216.9577
NOV
1.646264
-2.39339
4.039651
-3.692551406
13.63494
5.728304
DEC
7.585286
4.770908
2.814378
-2.467278063
6.087461
22.76156
2008 JAN
-15.0715
-13.0048
-2.0667
2.413797413
5.826418
169.1245
FEB
-0.88409
-0.39657
-0.48752
0.834616326
0.696584
0.15727
MAR
-8.36982
-11.0035
2.633708
-2.286608411
5.228578
121.0777
APL
6.510056
10.5013
-3.99125
4.338346289
18.82125
110.2774
MAY
-5.11058
-5.04266
-0.06792
0.415022146
0.172243
25.4284
JUN
-14.8711
-17.9949
3.123803
-2.776702677
7.710078
323.8174
JULY
6.259351
6.642227
-0.38288
0.729975995
0.532865
44.11918
AUG
3.611468
1.45433
2.157138
-1.810037944
3.276237
2.115076
SEP
-7.35676
-11.7003
4.34358
-3.996480234
15.97185
136.898
OCT
-22.4734
-23.8901
1.416689
-1.069589295
1.144021
570.737
NOV
-5.18885
-7.10396
1.915115
-1.568014871
2.458671
50.46627
2007 JAN
DEC
3.898825
6.099275
-2.20045
2.547549815
6.49001
37.20116
2009 JAN
-7.70431
-2.31225
-5.39206
5.73916105
32.93797
5.346504
FEB
-5.23893
-5.6517
0.412777
-0.065677352
0.004314
31.94174
MAR
6.316396
9.1872
-2.8708
3.217903695
10.3549
84.40465
APL
13.94526
17.45635
-3.51109
3.858190515
14.88563
304.7242
MAY
29.12012
28.2551
0.865017
-0.517917027
0.268238
798.3508
TOTAL
30.39962
20.68083
9.718797
-4.44089E-15
181.7403
3396.941
AVG
1.085701
0.738601
0.3471
-1.58603E-16
6.490725
Standard Deviation for the fund’s excess return (S.D.) σi=√6.490725 =2.54769 Sharpe Index (Si) = (Ri - Rf)/Si = (1.085701-5)/ 2.54769 =-1.53641 Treynor's Index (Ti) = (Ri - Rf)/Bi. =(1.085701-5)/ 0.921779 =-4.24646 Jenson alpha (αp)= Ri –[ Rf + Bi (Rm - Rf) ] =1.08570 1=
[5+0.921779 (0.738601-5)] 0.013767
Expected return E(Ri) = Rf + Bi (Rm - Rf) =[5+0.921779 (0.738601-5)]
=1.071934
Fema Measures Selectivity =Ri –[ Rf + Bi (Rm - Rf) ] =1.08570 1=
[5+0.921779 (0.738601-5)] 0.013767
Diversification =[Rf + (Rm - Rf)(αi/ αm)]-[Rf + Bi (Rm - Rf)] =[5+(0.738601-5)( 2.54769/10.98971)]- [5+0.921779 (0.738601-5)] =2.940167 Net selectivity= selectivity- diversification =0.013767-2.940167 =-2.9264
HDFC LONG TERM FUND
Investment Objective To achieve long term capital appreciation. Basic Scheme Information
Nature of Scheme
Close Ended Equity Scheme with a maturity period of 5 years with automatic conversion into an open-ended scheme upon maturity of the Scheme.
Inception Date
10-Feb-06
Closing Date
27-Jan-06
Option/Plan
Dividend Option,Growth Option. Dividend Option currently offers payout facility only.
Entry Load
NIL
(purchase / additional
(With effect from August 1, 2009)
purchase / switch-in)
Exit Load (as a % of the Applicable NAV) (Other than Systematic Investment Plan (SIP)/ Systematic Transfer Plan (STP))
Redemption / Switch-out from the Date of Allotment : •
Upto 12 months 4%
•
After 12 months upto 24 months 3%
•
After 24 months upto 36 months 2%
•
After 36 months upto 48 months 1%
•
After 48 months upto 54 months 0.5%
•
After 54 months upto Maturity Nil
No Exit Load shall be levied on bonus units and units allotted on dividend reinvestment. Specified Redemption Period
A Unit holder can submit redemption/ switch-out request only during the Specified Redemption Period. Presently, the
Specified Redemption Period is the first five Business Days immediately after the end of each calendar half year. Minimum Application
Currently no purchases/ switch-ins are allowed into this
Amount
scheme.
(Other than Systematic Investment Plan (SIP)/ Systematic Transfer Plan (STP)) Lock-In-Period
Nil
Net Asset Value Periodicity
Every Business Day.
Redemption Proceeds
Normally dispatched within 3 Days
Current Expense Ratio (#)
On the first 100 crores average weekly net assets 2.50%
(Effective Date 22nd May
On the next 300 crores average weekly net assets 2.25%
2009)
On the next 300 crores average weekly net assets 2.00% On the balance of the assets 1.75%
Investment Pattern The following table provides the asset allocation of the Schemes portfolio. Type of Instruments
Minimum Allocation Minimum Allocation Risk Profile of the Instrument
Equity & Equity related
(% of Net Assets)
(% of Net Assets)
70
100
High
0
30
Low
instruments Fixed Income Securities (including money market instruments)
Investment Strategy The investment strategy of the Scheme is to build and maintain a diversified portfolio of equity stocks that have the potential to appreciate in the long run. Companies identified for selection in the portfolio will have demonstrated a potential ability to grow at a reasonable rate for the long term. The aim will be to build a portfolio that adequately reflects a cross-section of the growth areas of the economy from time to time. While the portfolio focuses primarily on a buy and hold strategy at most times, it will balance the same with a rational approach to selling when the valuations become too demanding even in the face of reasonable growth prospects in the long run. Fund Manager Mr. Srinivas Rao Ravuri (since Apr 3, 06) Mr. Anand Laddha - Dedicated Fund Manager - Foreign Securities
HDFC LONG TERM FUND Table:3.11 NAV
SENSEX
Ri
Rm
Ri Rm
Rm-Rm av
sqr(RmRm av)
Rm2
2007 JAN
95.224
14090.92
FEB
87.782
12938.09
-7.81526
-8.18137
63.93949
-8.91997
79.56584
66.93478
MAR
86.337
13072.1
-1.64612
1.035779
-1.70502
0.297178
0.088315
1.072838
APL
91.627
13872.37
6.127153
6.12197
37.51024
5.383369
28.98066
37.47851
MAY
96.561
14544.46
5.384876
4.84481
26.0887
4.106209
16.86095
23.47219
JUN
100.695
14650.51
4.281232
0.729144
3.121633
-0.00946
8.94E-05
0.53165
JULY
102.976
15550.99
2.265256
6.146407
13.92319
5.407806
29.24437
37.77832
AUG
102.627
15318.6
-0.33891
-1.49437
0.506464
-2.23298
4.986179
2.233155
SEP
109.68
17291.1
6.87246
12.8765
88.49326
12.1379
147.3287
165.8043
OCT
118.185
19837.99
7.754376
14.72949
114.218
13.99088
195.7448
216.9577
NOV
119.445
19363.19
1.066125
-2.39339
-2.55165
-3.13199
9.809352
5.728304
DEC
128.983
20286.99
7.985265
4.770908
38.09697
4.032307
16.2595
22.76156
2008 JAN
112.202
17648.71
-13.0102
-13.0048
169.1954
-13.7434
188.8807
169.1245
FEB
110.554
17578.72
-1.46878
-0.39657
0.582478
-1.13517
1.28862
0.15727
MAR
96.105
15644.44
-13.0696
-11.0035
143.8121
-11.7421
137.8777
121.0777
APL
103.44
17287.31
7.632277
10.5013
80.14885
9.762702
95.31035
110.2774
MAY
99.18
16415.57
-4.11833
-5.04266
20.76733
-5.78126
33.42296
25.4284
JUN
85.045
13461.6
-14.2519
-17.9949
256.4613
-18.7335
350.9451
323.8174
JULY
88.972
14355.75
4.617555
6.642227
30.67085
5.903626
34.8528
44.11918
AUG
93.359
14564.53
4.930765
1.45433
7.17096
0.715729
0.512268
2.115076
SEP
82.286
12860.43
-11.8607
-11.7003
138.7739
-12.4389
154.7273
136.898
OCT
63.504
9788.06
-22.8253
-23.8901
545.298
-24.6287
606.5731
570.737
NOV
57.237
9092.72
-9.86867
-7.10396
70.10665
-7.84256
61.50578
50.46627
DEC
61.406
9647.31
7.28375
6.099275
44.42559
5.360674
28.73683
37.20116
2009 JAN
58.709
9424.24
-4.39208
-2.31225
10.15559
-3.05085
9.307696
5.346504
FEB
55.785
8891.61
-4.9805
-5.6517
28.14829
-6.3903
40.83598
31.94174
MAR
59.209
9708.5
6.137851
9.1872
56.38966
8.448599
71.37883
84.40465
APL
68.298
11403.25
15.35071
17.45635
267.9674
16.71775
279.4832
304.7242
MAY
87.958
14625.25
28.78562
28.2551
813.3405
27.5165
757.1579
798.3508
TOTAL
6.828943
20.68083
3065.056
0
3381.666
3396.941
AVG
0.243891
0.738601
109.4663
0
120.7738
Figure:3.4
σm= √120.7738 =10.98971 β (Beta) =[N (Σ XY) – Σ XΣ Y ]/[ N (Σ X2) – (Σ X) 2 ] = (85821.57- 141.2282)/ (95114.34- 427.6966) = 85680.34/ 94686.64 = 0.904883
Table:3.12
Ri
Rm
Ri-Rm
Dev frm ave
sq of Dev frm av
FEB
-7.81526
-8.18137
0.366111
-0.860821325
0.741013
MAR
-1.64612
1.035779
-2.6819
2.187192079
4.783809
APL
6.127153
6.12197
0.005183
-0.499893333
0.249893
MAY
5.384876
4.84481
0.540065
-1.034775537
1.07076
JUN
4.281232
0.729144
3.552088
-4.046798071
16.37657
JULY
2.265256
6.146407
-3.88115
3.386440599
11.46798
AUG
-0.33891
-1.49437
1.15546
-1.650170515
2.723063
SEP
6.87246
12.8765
-6.00404
5.509332488
30.35274
OCT
7.754376
14.72949
-6.97511
6.48039862
41.99557
NOV
1.066125
-2.39339
3.459513
-3.954222903
15.63588
DEC
7.985265
4.770908
3.214357
-3.709067209
13.75718
2008 JAN
-13.0102
-13.0048
-0.00545
-0.489256261
0.239372
FEB
-1.46878
-0.39657
-1.07221
0.577496505
0.333502
MAR
-13.0696
-11.0035
-2.0661
1.571389464
2.469265
APL
7.632277
10.5013
-2.86903
2.374315379
5.637374
MAY
-4.11833
-5.04266
0.924329
-1.419039116
2.013672
JUN
-14.2519
-17.9949
3.743063
-4.237772814
17.95872
JULY
4.617555
6.642227
-2.02467
1.529961243
2.340781
AUG
4.930765
1.45433
3.476435
-3.971144712
15.76999
SEP
-11.8607
-11.7003
-0.16032
-0.334386466
0.111814
OCT
-22.8253
-23.8901
1.064835
-1.559545364
2.432182
NOV
-9.86867
-7.10396
-2.76471
2.26999821
5.152892
DEC
7.28375
6.099275
1.184475
-1.679185121
2.819663
2009 JAN
-4.39208
-2.31225
-2.07983
1.585118054
2.512599
FEB
-4.9805
-5.6517
0.671205
-1.165915514
1.359359
MAR
6.137851
9.1872
-3.04935
2.554639268
6.526182
2007 JAN
APL
15.35071
17.45635
-2.10565
1.610935739
2.595114
MAY
28.78562
28.2551
0.530513
-1.025223388
1.051083
TOTAL
6.828943
20.68083
-13.8519
-4.44089E-15
210.478
AVG
0.243891
0.738601
-0.49471
-1.58603E-16
5.538895
Standard Deviation for the fund’s excess return (S.D.) σi=√5.538895 =2.353486 Sharpe Index (Si) = (Ri - Rf)/Si = (0.243891-5)/ 2.353486 =-2.02088 Treynor's Index (Ti) = (Ri - Rf)/Bi. =(0.243891-5)/ 0.904883 =-5.25605 Jenson alpha (αp)= Ri –[ Rf + Bi (Rm - Rf) ] =0.243891- [5+0.904883 (0.738601-5)] =
-0.90004
Expected return E(Ri) = Rf + Bi (Rm - Rf) =[5+0.904883 (0.738601-5)] =1.143932
Fema Measures Selectivity =Ri –[ Rf + Bi (Rm - Rf) ]
=0.243891- [5+0.904883 (0.738601-5)] =
-0.90004
Diversification =[Rf + (Rm - Rf)(αi/ αm)]-[Rf + Bi (Rm - Rf)] =[5+(0.738601-5)( 2.353486/10.98971)]- [5+0.904883 (0.738601-5)] =2.943474 Net selectivity= selectivity- diversification =-0.90004-2.943474 =-3.84352
HDFC TAXSAVER Investment Objective The investment objective of the Scheme is to achieve long term growth of capital. Basic Scheme Information Table:3.13
Nature of Scheme
Open Ended Equity Linked Saving Scheme
Inception Date
Mar 31, 1996
Option/Plan
Dividend Option, Growth Option,
Entry Load
NIL
(purchase / additional purchase / switch-
(With effect from August 1, 2009)
in)
Exit Load.
Nil
(as a % of the Applicable NAV) Minimum Application Amount
Rs.5000 and in multiples of Rs.100
thereof to open an account / folio. Lock-In-Period
3 yrs
Net Asset Value Periodicity
Every Business Day
Redemption Proceeds
Normally despatched within 3 Business days
Investment Pattern The asset allocation under the Scheme will be as follows: Table:3.14
SR NO.
ASSET TYPE
(% OF PORTFOLIO)
1
Equities & Equities
RISK PROFILE
Minimum 80%
Medium to high
Minimum 20%
Low to medium
related instruments 2
Debt securities, money market instruments & cash
Investment in Securitized debt, if undertaken, would not exceed 20% of the net assets of the scheme.
The Scheme may also invest up to 25% of net assets of the Scheme in derivatives such as Futures & Options and such other derivative instruments as may be introduced from time to time for the purpose of hedging and portfolio balancing and and other uses as may be permitted under the regulations and guidelines.
The Scheme may also invest a part of its corpus, not exceeding 40% of its net assets, in overseas markets in Global Depository Receipts (GDRs), ADRs, overseas equity, bonds and mutual funds and such other instruments as may be allowed under the Regulations from time to time. The ELSS (Equity Linked Savings Scheme) guidelines, as applicable, would be adhered to in the management of this Fund.
If the investment in equities and related
instruments falls below 80% of the portfolio of the Scheme at any point in time, it would be endeavoured to review and rebalance the composition. Benchmark Index : S&P CNX 500. HDFC Tax saver, which is benchmarked to S&P CNX 500 Index is not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by Indian Index Service & Products Limited (IISL). Fund Manager : Dhawal Mehta
HDFC TAX SAVER FUND Table:3.15 NAV
S&P CNX 500
Ri
Rm
Ri Rm
Rm-Rm av
sqr(RmRm av) Rm2
2007 JAN
146.134
4899.39
FEB
135.133
4504.73
-7.52802
-8.05529
60.64039
-9.0864
82.56268
64.88767
MAR
133.882
4605.89
-0.92575
2.24564
-2.07891
1.214527
1.475077
5.042897
APL
144.308
4934.46
7.787455
7.133692
55.5533
6.10258
37.24148
50.88956
MAY
153.765
5185.95
6.553344
5.096606
33.39982
4.065494
16.52824
25.9754
JUN
156.535
5223.82
1.80145
0.730242
1.315495
-0.30087
0.090523
0.533254
JULY
163.61
5483.25
4.519756
4.966289
22.44641
3.935177
15.48562
24.66403
AUG
161.481
5411.29
-1.30127
-1.31236
1.707729
-2.34347
5.491863
1.72229
SEP
173.27
6094.11
7.300549
12.61843
92.12149
11.58732
134.266
159.2248
OCT
198.737
7163.3
14.69787
17.54465
257.8689
16.51353
272.6968
307.8146
NOV
196.735
6997.6
-1.00736
-2.31318
2.330208
-3.34429
11.18429
5.3508
DEC
204.284
7461.48
3.837141
6.62913
25.43691
5.598018
31.3378
43.94536
2008 JAN
173.277
6245.45
-15.1784
-16.2974
247.3687
-17.3285
300.2786
FEB
171.845
6356.92
-0.82642
1.784819
-1.47501
0.753707
0.568075
3.18558
MAR
152.02
5762.88
-11.5366
-9.34478
107.8066
-10.3759
107.6591
87.32486
APL
158.411
6289.07
4.204052
9.130678
38.38584
8.099566
65.60296
83.36928
265.6065
MAY
148.793
5937.81
-6.07155
-5.58525
33.91109
-6.61636
43.77619
31.19497
JUN
126.45
4929.98
-15.0162
-16.9731
254.8707
-18.0042
324.1514
288.0859
JULY
135.953
5297.47
7.515223
7.454188
56.01989
6.423076
41.25591
55.56493
AUG
142.358
5337.28
4.711187
0.751491
3.540414
-0.27962
0.078188
0.564738
SEP
132.682
4807.2
-6.79695
-9.93165
67.50492
-10.9628
120.1822
98.63768
OCT
99.119
3539.57
-25.2958
-26.3694
667.0357
-27.4005
750.7883
695.3455
NOV
90.957
3379.53
-8.23455
-4.52145
37.23212
-5.55257
30.83098
20.44354
DEC
98.972
3635.87
8.811856
7.585078
66.83862
6.553966
42.95447
57.53341
2009 JAN
93.555
3538.57
-5.47327
-2.67611
14.64708
-3.70723
13.74352
FEB
89.449
3403.33
-4.38886
-3.82188
16.77372
-4.85299
23.55156
14.60679
MAR
97.063
3720.51
8.512113
9.319696
79.3303
8.288584
68.70062
86.85673
APL
112.05
4278.54
15.44049
14.99875
231.588
13.96764
195.0949
224.9625
MAY
144.827
5480.11
29.25212
28.08365
821.5062
27.05253
731.8396
788.6911
TOTAL
15.36369
28.87114
3293.627
0
3469.417
3499.186
AVG
0.548703
1.031112
117.6295
7.161582
123.9077
Figure:3.5
σm= √123.9077 =11.13139 β (Beta) =[N (Σ XY) – Σ XΣ Y ]/[ N (Σ X2) – (Σ X) 2 ] = (92221.54- 443.5671)/ (97977.21- 833.5426) = 91777.98/ 97143.67 = 0.944765 Table:3.16 Ri
Rm
Ri-Rm
Dev frm ave
sq of Dev frm av
FEB
-7.52802
-8.05529
0.527266
-1.00968
1.019444
MAR
-0.92575
2.24564
-3.17139
2.688985
7.230641
APL
7.787455
7.133692
0.653763
-1.13617
1.290886
MAY
6.553344
5.096606
1.456738
-1.93915
3.760291
JUN
1.80145
0.730242
1.071208
-1.55362
2.413726
JULY
4.519756
4.966289
-0.44653
-0.03588
0.001287
AUG
-1.30127
-1.31236
0.011095
-0.4935
0.243546
SEP
7.300549
12.61843
-5.31788
4.835475
23.38182
OCT
14.69787
17.54465
-2.84678
2.364366
5.590227
NOV
-1.00736
-2.31318
1.305818
-1.78823
3.197757
DEC
3.837141
6.62913
-2.79199
2.30958
5.334158
2008 JAN
-15.1784
-16.2974
1.119058
-1.60147
2.564696
FEB
-0.82642
1.784819
-2.61124
2.128833
4.531929
MAR
-11.5366
-9.34478
-2.19178
1.709373
2.921956
APL
4.204052
9.130678
-4.92663
4.444217
19.75106
MAY
-6.07155
-5.58525
-0.4863
0.003894
1.52E-05
2007 JAN
JUN
-15.0162
-16.9731
1.956929
-2.43934
5.950372
JULY
7.515223
7.454188
0.061035
-0.54344
0.295331
AUG
4.711187
0.751491
3.959696
-4.44211
19.7323
SEP
-6.79695
-9.93165
3.134702
-3.61711
13.08349
OCT
-25.2958
-26.3694
1.073584
-1.55599
2.421115
NOV
-8.23455
-4.52145
-3.71309
3.230684
10.43732
DEC
8.811856
7.585078
1.226778
-1.70919
2.921319
2009 JAN
-5.47327
-2.67611
-2.79715
2.314743
5.358035
FEB
-4.38886
-3.82188
-0.56698
0.08457
0.007152
MAR
8.512113
9.319696
-0.80758
0.325174
0.105738
APL
15.44049
14.99875
0.441737
-0.92415
0.854046
MAY
29.25212
28.08365
1.168474
-1.65088
2.725415
TOTAL
15.36369
28.87114
-13.5075
147.1251
AVG
0.548703
1.031112
-0.48241
5.254467
Standard Deviation for the fund’s excess return (S.D.) σi=√ 5.254467
= 2.292262
Sharpe Index (Si) = (Ri - Rf)/Si = (0.548703-5)/ 2.292262 =-1.94188 Treynor's Index (Ti) = (Ri - Rf)/Bi. =(0.548703-5)/ 0.944765 =-4.71154
Jenson alpha (αp) = Ri –[ Rf + Bi (Rm - Rf) ] =0.548703- [5+0.944765 (1.031112-5)] =
-0.70163
Expected return E(Ri) = Rf + Bi (Rm - Rf) =[5+0.944765 (1.031112-5)] =1.250332 Fema Measure: Selectivity =Ri –[ Rf + Bi (Rm - Rf) ] =0.548703 =
[5+0.944765 (1.031112-5)] -0.70163
Diversification = [Rf + (Rm - Rf)(αi/ αm)]-[Rf + Bi (Rm - Rf)] =[5+(1.031112-5)( 2.292262/11.13139)]- [5+0.944765 (1.031112-5)] =2.932363 Net selectivity= selectivity- diversification =-0.70163-2.932363 =-3.63399
HDFC TOP 200 FUND
Investment Objective
The investment objective is to generate long-term capital appreciation from a portfolio of equity and equity linked instruments. The investment portfolio for equity and equity-linked instruments will be primarily drawn from the companies in the BSE 200 Index. Further, the Scheme may also invest in listed companies that would qualify to be in the top 200 by market capitalisation on the BSE even though they may not be listed on the BSE This includes participation in large IPO’s where in the market capitalisation of the company based on issue price would make the company a part of the top 200 companies listed on the BSE based on market capitalisation. Basic Scheme Information Table:3.17
Nature of Scheme
Open Ended Equity Growth Scheme
Inception Date
Oct 11, 1996
Option/Plan
Dividend Option, Growth Option,
Entry Load
NIL
(purchase / additional purchase / switch-
(With effect from August 1, 2009)
in)
Exit Load.
Nil
Minimum Application Amount
Rs.5000 and in multiples of Rs.100 thereof to open an account / folio. Additional purchases is Rs. 1000 and in multiples of Rs. 100 thereof.
Lock-In-Period
Nil
Investment Pattern The asset allocation under the Scheme will be as follows:
Table:3.18
SR NO.
ASSET TYPE
(% OF PORTFOLIO)
RISK PROFILE
1
Equities & Equities
Upto 100% (including use of
related instruments
derivatives for hedging and other
Medium to high
uses as permitted by prevailing SEBI Regulations) 2
Debt securities, money
Balance in Debt & Money Market
market instruments &
Instruments
Low to medium
cash Investment in Securitised debt, if undertaken, would not exceed 20% of the net assets of the scheme. The Scheme may also invest upto 25% of net assets of the Scheme in derivatives such as Futures & Options and such other derivative instruments as may be introduced from time to time for the purpose of hedging and portfolio balancing and other uses as may be permitted under the regulations and guidelines. Investment Strategy & Risk Control The investment strategy of primarily restricting the equity portfolio to the BSE 200 Index scrips is intended to reduce risks while maintaining steady growth. Stock specific risk will be minimised by investing only in those companies / industries that have been thoroughly researched by the investment manager's research team. Risk will also be reduced through a diversification of the portfolio. Benchmark Index : BSE 200 Fund Manager : Mr. Prashant Jain
HDFC TOP 200 FUND Table:3.19 Ri
Rm
Ri Rm
Rm-AvRm
(RmAvRm)2
Rm2
2007 JAN
112.359
1687.35
FEB
103.269
1545.27
-8.09014
-8.4203
68.12144
-9.34081
87.25075
70.90152
MAR
104.504
1556.72
1.195906
0.740971
0.886131
-0.17954
0.032233
0.549038
APRI L
111.805
1666.14
6.986335
7.028881
49.10612
6.108374
37.31223
49.40517
MAY
119.096
1766.08
6.521175
5.998295
39.11594
5.077788
25.78393
35.97955
JUNE
120.34
1804.81
1.044536
2.192992
2.290658
1.272485
1.619219
4.809216
JULY
127.614
1894.18
6.04454
4.951768
29.93116
4.031261
16.25106
24.52
AUG
126.201
1857.7
-1.10725
-1.9259
2.132443
-2.84641
8.10203
3.709088
SEPT
140.49
2118.86
11.32241
14.05824
159.1733
13.13774
172.6001
197.6342
OCT
160.215
2439.87
14.04015
15.15013
212.71
14.22962
202.4821
229.5264
NOV
158.356
2454.23
-1.16032
0.588556
-0.68291
-0.33195
0.110192
0.346398
DEC
169.794
2656.52
7.222966
8.242504
59.53532
7.321997
53.61163
67.93887
2008 JAN
147.718
2230.39
-13.0016
-16.0409
208.5581
-16.9614
287.6897
257.3108
FEB
147.689
2217.47
-0.01963
-0.57927
0.011372
-1.49978
2.249334
0.335555
MAR
131.544
1932.41
-10.9318
-12.8552
140.5298
-13.7757
189.7699
165.2559
APRI L
143.025
2157.52
8.727878
11.64918
101.6727
10.72868
115.1045
135.7035
MAY
137.675
2038.22
-3.7406
-5.5295
20.68366
-6.45
41.60255
30.57534
JUNE
115.424
1644.18
-16.162
-19.3326
312.4523
-20.2531
410.1865
373.7477
JULY
123.902
1749.11
7.345093
6.381905
46.87568
5.461398
29.82686
40.72871
AUG
129.235
1782.08
4.304208
1.884959
8.113254
0.964452
0.930167
3.553069
SEPT
118.754
1555.7
-8.11003
-12.7031
103.0228
-13.6236
185.6036
161.3696
OCT
92.324
1145.68
-22.2561
-26.356
586.5812
-27.2765
744.0068
694.6377
NOV
86.546
1062.35
-6.25839
-7.27341
45.51987
-8.19392
67.14027
52.90249
DEC
92.798
1156.59
7.223904
8.870899
64.08253
7.950392
63.20874
78.69286
2009 JAN
88.074
1107.06
-5.09063
-4.28242
21.80018
-5.20292
27.07041
18.33909
FEB
84.379
1044.94
-4.19534
-5.61126
23.54111
-6.53177
42.66396
31.48622
MAR
92.552
1140.43
9.686059
9.138324
88.51435
8.217817
67.53251
83.50896
APRI L
107.584
1339.38
16.24168
17.44517
283.3389
16.52467
273.0646
304.3341
MAY
139.341
1772.82
29.51833
32.36124
955.2498
31.44073
988.5198
1047.25
Total
37.30138
25.7742
3632.867
0
4141.326
4165.051
Avera ge
1.332192
0.920507
129.7453
0
147.9045
Figure:3.6
σm= √147.9045 =12.1616
β (Beta) =[N (Σ XY) – Σ XΣ Y ]/[ N (Σ X2) – (Σ X) 2 ]
= (101720.3- 961.4133)/ (116621.4- 664.3093) = 100758.9/ 115957.1 = 0.868932
Table:3.20 Ri
Rm
Ri-Rm
dev frm av
sq of dev
Rm2
FEB
-8.09014
-8.4203
0.330164
0.081521
0.006646
70.90152
MAR
1.195906
0.740971
0.454935
-0.04325
0.001871
0.549038
APRIL
6.986335
7.028881
-0.04255
0.454231
0.206326
49.40517
MAY
6.521175
5.998295
0.52288
-0.11119
0.012364
35.97955
JUNE
1.044536
2.192992
-1.14846
1.560142
2.434043
4.809216
JULY
6.04454
4.951768
1.092773
-0.68109
0.46388
24.52
AUG
-1.10725
-1.9259
0.818654
-0.40697
0.165624
3.709088
SEPT
11.32241
14.05824
-2.73583
3.147515
9.906851
197.6342
OCT
14.04015
15.15013
-1.10998
1.521668
2.315473
229.5264
NOV
-1.16032
0.588556
-1.74887
2.160557
4.668006
0.346398
DEC
7.222966
8.242504
-1.01954
1.431223
2.048399
67.93887
2008 JAN
-13.0016
-16.0409
3.039273
-2.62759
6.90422
257.3108
FEB
-0.01963
-0.57927
0.559639
-0.14795
0.02189
0.335555
MAR
-10.9318
-12.8552
1.923436
-1.51175
2.285389
165.2559
APRIL
8.727878
11.64918
-2.92131
3.332991
11.10883
135.7035
MAY
-3.7406
-5.5295
1.788892
-1.37721
1.896699
30.57534
2007 JAN
JUNE
-16.162
-19.3326
3.170579
-2.75889
7.611496
373.7477
JULY
7.345093
6.381905
0.963188
-0.5515
0.304156
40.72871
AUG
4.304208
1.884959
2.41925
-2.00756
4.030315
3.553069
SEPT
-8.11003
-12.7031
4.593101
-4.18142
17.48424
161.3696
OCT
-22.2561
-26.356
4.099889
-3.6882
13.60285
694.6377
NOV
-6.25839
-7.27341
1.015015
-0.60333
0.364007
52.90249
DEC
7.223904
8.870899
-1.647
2.058681
4.238165
78.69286
2009 JAN
-5.09063
-4.28242
-0.80821
1.219896
1.488145
18.33909
FEB
-4.19534
-5.61126
1.415923
-1.00424
1.008493
31.48622
MAR
9.686059
9.138324
0.547736
-0.13605
0.01851
83.50896
APRIL
16.24168
17.44517
-1.20349
1.615179
2.608803
304.3341
MAY
29.51833
32.36124
-2.84291
3.254597
10.5924
1047.25
37.30138
25.7742
11.52718
107.7981
4165.051
1.332192
0.920507
0.411685
3.849932
Standard Deviation for the fund’s excess return (S.D.) σi=√3.849932 =1.962124 Sharpe Index (Si) = (Ri - Rf)/Si = (1.332192-5)/ 1.962124 =-1.8693 Treynor's Index (Ti) = (Ri - Rf)/Bi. = (4.528901-5)/ 0.868932 =-4.22105 Jenson alpha (αp)= Ri –[ Rf + Bi (Rm - Rf) ] =1.332192- [5+0.868932 (0.920507-5)] =
-0.12301
Expected return E(Ri) = Rf + Bi (Rm - Rf)
=[5+0.868932 (0.920507-5)] =1.455198
Fema Measure: Selectivity =Ri –[ Rf + Bi (Rm - Rf) ] =1.332192- [5+0.868932 (0.920507-5)] =
-0.12301
Diversification =[Rf + (Rm - Rf)(αi/ αm)]-[Rf + Bi (Rm - Rf)] =[5+(0.920507-5)( 1.962124/12.1616)]- [5+0.868932 (0.920507-5)] =2.886626 Net selectivity= selectivity- diversification =-0.12301-2.886626 =-2.87834
3.2 ANALYSIS OF THE OBSERVATION: The table given below illustrates the comparison among the analysed funds based on the different measures of comparison.
Performance of Fund portfolio and Benchmark return for 29 months (jan07-may08) Table:3.21 FUND BENCHMARK RETURNS RETURN EQUITY FUND
12.22546
11.8529
Capital builder
4.872865
11.8529
Growth fund
16.48711
3.792016
Long term adv
-7.63043
3.792016
Tax saver
-0.89438
11.8529
Top 200
24.0141
5.065339
Figure:3.7
Performance Evaluation against Benchmarks The above table presents return and risk of the six funds along with market return and risk. From the table it is evident that, Top 200, Equity fund and Growth fund have earned greater return as against the market earning. Capital builder, Long term advantage and Tax saver funds have not earned higher return than the Market portfolio. Long-term advantage and Tax saver funds have even negative returns.
Comparison of ratios: Table:3.22 Fund name
S.D. market
S.D. fund
B value
Sharpe ratio
Treynor ratio
Jenson’s alpha
Fema
Retuns jan07may08(29 months)
HDFC Equity
11.13239
2.392215
1.0096114
-1.64557
-3.89907
0.070488
-3.0836
12.22546
HDFC Capital Builder
11.13239
2.545136
0.936265
-1.66872
-4.53625
-0.39357
-3.33967
4.872865
HDFC Growth Fund
10.98971
2.54769
0.921779
-1.53641
-4.24646
0.013767
-2.9264
16.48711
HDFC Long Term Adv
10.98971
2.353486
0.904883
-2.02088
-5.25605
-0.90004
-3.84352
-7.63043
HDFC Tax saver
11.13139
2.292262
0.944765
-1.94188
-4.71154
-0.70163
-3.63399
-0.89438
HDFC Top 200
12.1616
1.962124
0.868932
-1.8693
-4.22105
-0.12301
-2.87834
24.0141
Standard Deviation of the Market: High standard deviation of a fund implies high volatility and a low standard deviation implies low volatility. HDFC equity fund, HDFC capital Builder and HDFC Tax saver take S&P CNX 500 as their benchmark, HDFC Growth fund and HDFC long term have taken Sensex as bench mark and HDFC Top 200 has taken BSE 200 as its bench mark. We found out that BSE 200’s S.D. is 12.1616, which is greater than Sensex and S&P CNX 500 having 10.98971 and 11.13139 S.D. respectively. Therefore, BSE 200 is more volatile than Sensex and S&P CNX 500. Standard deviation of the Fund: It has been found that HDFC Top 200’s S.D. is lesser than all other funds. Although benchmark index (BSE 200) is more volatile as it has higher S.D. than other indexes still HDFC Top 200 is less volatile because of lesser fund S.D. This is might be because of diversification of unsystematic risk as it compensates the systematic risk. β Value : As we know in case of funds, beta would indicate the volatility against the benchmark index. It is used as a short term decision making tool. A beta that is greater than 1 means that the fund is more volatile than the benchmark index, while a beta of less than 1 means that the fund is more volatile than the benchmark index. A fund with a beta very close to 1 means the fund’s performance closely matches the index or benchmark. The analysis illustrates that HDFC Equity fund’s is less volatile and its performance is very close to its benchmark as its beta value is 1.0096114 compared to other funds which have beta value lesser than 1 point. HDFC Top 200’s beta value is more volatile than the benchmark as its value is 0.868932, which is very far from point 1. Sharpe ratio: A fund with a higher Sharpe ratio means that these returns have been generated taking lesser risk. In other words, the fund is less volatile and yet generating good return. The analysis shows that all the funds have negative Sharpe ratio therefore they are more risky. Comparing all the funds HDFC growth fund has lesser negative marks that means its return 16.48711 is generated taking lesser risk.
Treynor ratio: While a high and positive Treynor's Index shows a superior risk-adjusted performance of a fund, a low and negative Treynor's Index is an indication of unfavourable performance (systematic risk associated with it (beta)). All the funds are having negative Treynor’s ratio which means they are affected by the volatility of the market (systematic risk)or by the great recession. Jenson’s alpha: Its measure involves evaluation of the returns that the fund has generated vs. the returns actually expected out of the fund given the level of its systematic risk. Higher alpha represents superior performance of the fund and vice versa. The analysis points out that all the funds are having negative alpha except HDFC Equity fund and HDFC Growth fund which have positive points. Jenson alpha ratio justifies that these two funds are at least able to achieve the expected return given the level of their systematic risk. Fema measure: The Net Selectivity (Fema) represents the stock selection skill of the fund manager, as it is the excess returns over and above the return required to compensate for the total risk taken by the fund manager. Higher value of which indicates that fund manager has earned returns well above the return commensurate with the level of risk taken by him. It has been that all the funds are having negative net selectivity because of the higher risk found both in systematic risk (B) and unsystematic risk. This findings point out, that the stock selection of the fund manager has been failed because of the systematic risk i.e. recession. Comparing to other funds HDFC Growth fund (-2.9264) has lesser negative points in this time of great crisis. This indicates that HDFC Growth fund is getting enhanced return by nullifying systematic risk and unsystematic risk.
From the above analysis there is no fund which has consistency. The funds are being affected very badly either by the systematic risk or by the unsystematic risk. As we observe closely, it is the HDFC Growth fund, which has better option for the investment. Its Sharpe ratio is
lesser negative than other funds which illustrates that its return is less affected by overall risk. Its alpha value is more than 0 which means its less affected by the market risk (systematic risk) and also its Fema value (selectivity) has lesser negative value which has managed to nullify systematic risk and unsystematic risk during the time of recession. An investor who is entering into the capital market for making long-term investment, the volatility of the market is important to accomplish his or her goal and these expectations are often formed on the basis of historical record of monthly returns, measured for holding period and other important ratios. We will take this fund (HDFC Growth fund) for further analysis of its portfolio.
HDFC Growth Fund Portfolio Analysis Table:3.23 Portfolio
31-May-09
Name of Instrument
Industry +
Quantity
Market/ Fair Value(Rs. In Lakhs)
% toNAV
Equity & Equity Related (a) Listed / awaiting listing on Stock Exchanges State Bank of India
Banks
448,000
8,372.45
7.20
Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd.
Media & Entertainment
4,160,179
7,001.58
6.02
ICICI Bank Ltd.
Banks
932,397
6,901.14
5.93
Bharti Airtel Ltd.
Telecom - Services
750,346
6,159.59
5.30
Crompton Greaves Ltd.
Industrial Capital Goods
2,099,819
5,513.07
4.74
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited
Petroleum Products
926,557
4,305.71
3.70
Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd.$
Finance
182,500
3,977.77
3.42
Exide Industries Ltd.
Auto Ancillaries
5,319,910
3,769.16
3.24
Divis Laboratories Ltd.
Pharmaceuticals
318,535
3,666.18
3.15
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
Pharmaceuticals
272,365
3,305.83
2.84
H T Media Ltd.
Media & Entertainment
2,307,000
2,861.83
2.46
Solar Explosives Ltd.
Chemicals
913,257
2,807.81
2.41
Nestle India Ltd.
Consumer Non Durables
160,268
2,766.79
2.38
Dr Reddys Laboratories Ltd.
Pharmaceuticals
420,000
2,719.50
2.34
ITC Ltd.
Consumer Non Durables
1,462,305
2,685.52
2.31
Coromandel Fertilisers Ltd.
Fertilisers
1,433,271
2,608.55
2.24
Biocon Limited
Pharmaceuticals
1,319,006
2,397.95
2.06
Reliance Industries Ltd.
Petroleum Products
104,250
2,368.46
2.04
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd.
Petroleum Products
633,721
2,300.09
1.98
Dabur India Ltd.
Consumer Non Durables
2,050,115
2,264.35
1.95
Bank of Baroda
Banks
469,151
2,058.63
1.77
Infosys Technologies Ltd
Software
120,000
1,926.12
1.66
MphasiS Limited Axis Bank Ltd
Software Banks
569,000 220,000
1,916.96 1,713.69
1.65 1.47
Apollo Tyres Ltd
Auto Ancillaries
5,367,120
1,682.59
1.45
Tata Steel Limited
Ferrous Metals
400,000
1,621.40
1.39
Hindustan Unilever Ltd.
Consumer Non Durables
653,355
1,507.94
1.30
Noida Toll Bridge Company Ltd.
Transportation
3,607,000
1,441.00
1.24
Thermax Ltd.
Industrial Capital Goods
367,366
1,345.29
1.16
Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.
Oil
111,353
1,301.99
1.12
Nagarjuna Construction Co. Ltd.
Construction Project
711,738
990.03
0.85
Ballarpur Industries Ltd.
Paper Products
3,967,287
987.85
0.85
Eimco Elecon (India) Ltd.
Industrial Capital Goods
276,428
811.18
0.70
Amara Raja Batteries Ltd.
Auto Ancillaries
836,454
705.97
0.61
C & C Constructions Ltd
Construction
396,496
635.78
0.55
Maytas Infra Ltd
Construction
761,912
552.01
0.47
KNR Construction limited
Construction
710,597
531.53
0.46
ISMT Ltd.
Ferrous Metals
1,175,668
413.25
0.36
Ahmednagar Forgings Ltd.
Industrial Products
424,234
245.21
0.21
Disa India Ltd
Engineering
12,612
207.85
0.18
Technocraft Industries (India) Ltd
Ferrous Metals
538,745
199.07
0.17
Sub total
101,548.67
87.33
Total
101,548.67
87.33
Short Term Deposits as margin for Futures & Options
1,000.00
0.86
Cash margin / Earmarked cash for Futures & Options
5,072.00
4.36
Other Cash,Cash Equivalents and Net Current Assets
8,679.32
7.45
Net Assets
116,299.99
100.00
Table:3.24 Sectoral Allocation of Assets(%) Banks
16.37
Pharmaceuticals
10.39
Media & Entertainment
8.48
Consumer Non Durables
7.94
Petroleum Products
7.72
Industrial Capital Goods
6.60
Telecom - Services
5.30
Auto Ancillaries
5.30
Finance
3.42
Software
3.31
Chemicals
2.41
Fertilisers
2.24
Ferrous Metals
1.92
Construction
1.48
Transportation
1.24
Oil
1.12
Construction Project
0.85
Paper Products
0.85
Industrial Products
0.21
Engineering
0.18
Cash,Cash Equivalents and Net Current Assets
12.67
TOTAL
100
Figure:3.8
Table:3.25 HDFC Growth Fund
(NAV as at evaluation date 30-June-09, Rs. 57.219 Per unit)
Date
Period
NAV Per Unit (Rs.)
Returns (%) ^
Benchmark Returns (%) Sensex
December 30, 2008
Last Six months (182 days)
41.697
37.23
49.17
June 30, 2008
Last 1 Year (365 days)
53.472
7.01
7.67
June 30, 2006
Last 3 Years (1096 days)
36.034
16.65
10.95
June 30, 2004
Last 5 Years (1826 days)
16.439
28.31
24.74
June 30, 1999
Last 10 Years (3653 days)
N.A
N.A.
13.34
September 11, 2000
Since Inception (3214 days)
10
21.91
13.65
Figrure:3.9
HDFC Growth Fund - Analysis It requires a lot of research and constant watch on the capital market for a fund manager to analyze the portfolio of the particular fund. I took the secondary data from the fund review of the article corner from The Business Line web site. I comprehended the analysis and concluded my view as stated below. HDFC Growth Fund invests in stocks across market capitalisations. Despite a large-cap bias, mid and small cap stocks account for 28 per cent of the portfolio. The fund has managed to consistently beat its benchmark Sensex over one-, three- and five-year periods. In the latest portfolio, the fund has invested in as many as 52 stocks across 18 different sectors making it a fairly diversified portfolio. This may indicate net inflows into the fund. Sector Moves: There is a fair bit of stability in terms of top sector holdings in the portfolio. Banks (16.39 per cent) and pharmaceuticals (10.37 per cent) sectors continue to be the top two sector holdings, although exposures have been a bit reduced. Banks and consumer non-durables also figure among top holdings in the fund, and have seen increased exposures over the September-February period. While capital goods and banks have done well in the past year, they have been among the worst hit in the recent meltdown. The respective sector indices were beaten down by over 25 per cent in the last couple of months. Construction and predictably, software exposures have been pared in the six-month period. Interestingly, media and entertainment (8.48 per cent), which were not part of the portfolio six months ago is now in the top ten sector holdings for the fund. The power sector has been exited, while telecom services and auto ancillaries exposures have been increased substantially. Stock Moves: Most stocks are those whose prices have fallen during September-February, include stocks such as Zee Entertainment, HT Media and Dr Reddy's Labs. The fund has also taken profit booking opportunities, with several stocks whose prices rose between 60-105 per cent have been exited. These include, Axis Bank, Hanung Toys and Tata Power. Other high-profile exits include DLF, HPCL, Ranbaxy Labs, and Punj Lloyd. Reliance Industries, SBI, ONGC and BHEL are the stocks retained by the fund during the period and are among the fund's top holdings.
3.4 FINDINGS As far as analysis is concerned, we found out that the HDFC Growth Fund was among
the best performers fund. Although all the funds are affected by the global meltdown, (recession) still HDFC Growth Fund has better performed comparing to other funds for its systematic and unsystematic risk. It offers advantages of diversification, market timing, and selectivity. In the comparison of sample of funds, HDFC Growth fund is found highly diversified fund and because of high diversification, it has reduced the total risk of portfolio. Further, other funds were found very poor in diversification, market timing, and
selectivity. Although HDFC Top 200 Fund and Equity Fund performed better in terms of returns but these suffered by the systematic risk (market volatility) and lack of diversification. For the further clarification, we too studied the portfolio of HDFC Growth fund. One of the findings that I came across is that generally, a good model of asset classes
is the one that can explain a large portion of the variance of returns on the assets and there were some stocks in the fund portfolio, which were not aligned with strategy of the fund portfolio. The optimal situation involves the selection that proceeds from sensible assumptions, is carefully and logically constructed, and is broadly consistent with the data while collecting the stocks for the portfolio. The portfolio was showing constructive outcome in long time horizon and the results can be improved by making the minor changes in fund portfolio. Hence, the portfolio theory teaches us that investment choices are made on the basis
of expected risk and returns and these expectations can be satisfied by having right mix of assets.
3.5 RECOMMENDATIONS: Considering the above analysis, it can be noted that the three growth oriented mutual funds (HDFC Equity Fund, HDFC Growth Fund and HDFC Top 200 fund) have performed better than their benchmark indicators. Other funds such as HDFC Capital Builder Fund, HDFC Long term Advantage Fund did not perform well even some performed negatively. Though HDFC Equity Fund, HDFC Growth Fund and HDFC Top 200 fund have performed better than the benchmark of their systematic risk (volatility) but with respect to total risk the fund have not outperformed the Market Index. Growth oriented mutual funds are expected to offer the advantages of Diversification, Market timing and Selectivity. In the sample, HDFC Equity Fund, HDFC Growth Fund and HDFC Top 200 fund is found to be diversified fund and because of high diversification, it has reduced total risk of the portfolio. Whereas, others are low diversified and because of low diversification their total risk is found to be very high. Further, the fund managers of these under performing funds are found to be poor in terms of their ability of market timing and selectivity. The fund manager of HDFC Equity Fund, HDFC Growth Fund and HDFC Top 200
fund can improve the returns to the investors by increasing the systematic risk of the portfolio, which in turn can be done by identifying highly volatile shares. Alternatively, these can take advantage by diversification, which goes to reduce the risk if the same return is given to the investor at a reduced risk level, the compensation for risk might seem adequate. The fund manager of HDFC Capital Builder Fund, HDFC Long term Advantage Fund can earn better returns by adopting the marketing timing strategy and selecting the under priced securities. The fund manager can divide all securities into several asset classes and tries to
construct an efficient portfolio based on expected returns, risk, and correlations of indexes representing these asset classes. The investment should be done in the bench mark indexes to get an “efficient” portfolio in such a way that no other combination of these indexes would result in a portfolio with a higher return for a given level of
risk. It should be emphasized, however, that this is not a fully efficient portfolio because information about correlations among individual securities within an index and across the indexes is lost in the transition from individual securities to the benchmarks that represent them. These measures are more useful to investors who are putting their money into one
diversified fund and are able to use leverage or invest in the risk-free asset. When the investor is investing in the different funds, the fund’s marginal contribution to the portfolio’s risk and return is more important than its individual security characteristics. To construct an efficient portfolio, an investor must take account of the correlations among the being considered. It is not advisable to apply just procedure or approach for all situations at least when it comes to investments though the used measures are highly reliable in the studies done on similar veins. Even at this juncture it would still be recommended that instead of going ahead only on the basis of risk and return, other indicators like new projects, sector impact, individual sentiments about companies etc besides ‘common sense and intuition’ may also be looked into.
3.6 CONCLUSIONS: Mutual fund has become one of the important sources for investing. It is quite likely that a more efficient portfolio can be constructed directly from funds. Thus, the two-step process of choosing an asset allocation based on the information about benchmark indexes and then choosing funds in each category may be one of the best realistically attainable approaches. To use this approach to portfolio selection effectively, investors would benefit from estimates of future asset returns, risks and correlations, as well as from fund management’s disclosure of future asset exposures and appropriate benchmarks. It has been a great opportunity for me to get a first experience of Mutual Funds. My study is to get the feel of how the work is carried out in relation to fund’s portfolio aspect. I got an opportunity in relation to the documentation and also the portfolio analysis that have been carrying out in facilitating the investor and the fund manager.
REFERENCES Books: 1. Security Analysis and Portfolio Management (sixth Edition 1995) by Donald
E. Fisher and Ronald J. Jordan. Publication: Pearson education. 2. The Indian Financial System (second edition) by Bharati V. Pathak. Published by Dorling Kindersley (India) Pvt. Ltd., licensees of Pearson Education in South Asia. 3. Security Analysis and Portfolio Management by Khan and Jain. Magazines: •
Money Outlook (May &June 2009)
•
Business world (May & June 2009)
Websites •
www.hdfcfund.com
•
www.amfiindia.com
•
www.moneycontrol.com
•
www.sebi.gov.in
•
www.bseindia.com
•
www.nseindia.com
•
www.mutualfundsindia.com
•
www.valueresearch.com
•
www.indiainfoline.com
•
www.in.finance.yahoo.com
•
www.investing.businessweek.com
•
www.businessline.com
View more...
Comments